Slashdot Mirror


Opportunity Spots Curious Object On Mars

EhobaX writes "Space.com is reporting that NASA's Opportunity Mars rover has come across an interesting object -- perhaps a meteorite sitting out in the open at Meridiani Planum. Initial data taken by the robot's Mini-Thermal Emission Spectrometer (Mini-TES) is suggestive that the odd-looking "rock" is made of metal."

72 of 288 comments (clear)

  1. Beagle? by Allen+Zadr · · Score: 5, Funny

    So that is what happened to the Beagle lander! They finally found it.

    --
    Kinetic stupidity has a new brand leader: Allen Zadr.
  2. Robot Bunny? by fembots · · Score: 5, Funny

    I still prefer a cute bunny over metal robot.

    To make a good sci-fi story though, Opportunity might have just reached its expiry date and that'll keep everybody in suspense for a long time.

    1. Re:Robot Bunny? by actiondan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Things like rovers that stay in one place once they become refuse don't seem like much of a problem. Scraps of fabric blowing around in the martian wind seem a little more troublesome to me.

      The thing that came across to me in that 'bunny ears' story was that the engineers were not at all suprised that might be bits of tape, fabric etc loose on the martian surface.

      Each time one of these pieces of debris is observed, it will have to be identified to ensure it is not something more interesting. Wouldn't it be easier to spend some time making sure that the debris doesn't get loose in the first place?

    2. Re:Robot Bunny? by niktesla · · Score: 5, Funny
      send all our environmentalists to Mars to take care of it!

      Don't forget the telephone sanitizers, hairdressers, TV producers, and salespeople.

      --
      I've discovered a remarkable proof, but this margin is too small to contain it...
    3. Re:Robot Bunny? by jfw25 · · Score: 3, Funny
      Things like rovers that stay in one place once they become refuse don't seem like much of a problem. Scraps of fabric blowing around in the martian wind seem a little more troublesome to me.
      It's OK, they already thought of that. The parachutes are bio-degradable.

      What?

      DOH!

  3. That's no rock... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    it's a space station!

    1. Re:That's no rock... by escher · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's to small to be a space station!... ...

      I have a very bad feeling about this...

    2. Re:That's no rock... by rk · · Score: 5, Funny

      It could be a terrible miscalculation in scale. Good thing there are no small dogs on Mars.

  4. It's a Martian Coke can. by the_skywise · · Score: 2, Funny

    All that's left after the martian holocaust...

  5. sounds familiar by PhilipOfOregon · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wait -- I've seen this movie! DON'T GO LOOK AT IT!

  6. To boldy go... by cosinezero · · Score: 5, Funny

    If we tell GWB it's a WMD, maybe we'll finally get a real space program...

    1. Re:To boldy go... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I think you misunderestimate W. He's smart enough to stay the hell away from anyone who's even a few years from having WMD's (his record's pretty clear on this). Now if you told him it was OIL, THEN you'd get a space program!

    2. Re:To boldy go... by naugrim · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, he's already got a bunch of red states supporting his every move. I wonder what type of mandate he'd think he had if he had the entire red planet under him too.

    3. Re:To boldy go... by cosinezero · · Score: 2, Insightful

      it -is- a big freakin' desert.

  7. finally by Dark+Demon · · Score: 5, Funny

    Jimmy Hoffa has been found...

  8. Illudium pew-36 explosive space modulator? by Alien+Being · · Score: 5, Funny

    Be careful with the abrasion tool or there could be an earth-shattering kaboom.

    1. Re:Illudium pew-36 explosive space modulator? by Moofie · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'd rather start a flamewar about your spelling of marshmallows.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  9. Meteorite? by HeighYew · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I would think that a meteorite would've been buried in the sand instead of sitting on top of it...

    --
    There are 10 kinds of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't...what about the other 8?
    1. Re:Meteorite? by Stevyn · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Maybe it was. It could have come down very shallow and not made a deep impact. Then strong winds could have blown the sand around it to uncover it. If it is made of metal, then it's probably too heavy for the winds to move it much. The wavy patterns in the sand around it make me think the area gets some wind.

      I'm just guessing, of course, but it's a possibility.

    2. Re:Meteorite? by NTmatter · · Score: 2, Funny

      If it didn't roll, then who carried it?

  10. Finally, they found my pet rock. by LemonFire · · Score: 5, Funny

    I always wondered what happened to it.

    -- I discovered this SIG in the lost and found department.

  11. Meteorite with no crater? by schon · · Score: 3, Interesting

    OK, so speculation is that it's a meteorite - OK, but this was found on a large plain.. what are the odds that a meteor could hit a planet and not leave a crater? Wouldn't the gravity of Mars cause it to increase velocity?

    Anyone with more knowledge of meteor physics than me have an explanation?

    1. Re:Meteorite with no crater? by RobertB-DC · · Score: 3, Insightful

      OK, so speculation is that it's a meteorite - OK, but this was found on a large plain.. what are the odds that a meteor could hit a planet and not leave a crater? Wouldn't the gravity of Mars cause it to increase velocity?

      One scenario is that the rock hit Mars a gazillion years ago. Wind storms filled the area with Mars dust. Over the eons, the weather patterns changed, and now the wind storms are blowing the dust out of the area... uncovering the rock.

      Though the thing sure looks a lot like a dehydrated Martian to me. Just add water!

      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    2. Re:Meteorite with no crater? by LWATCDR · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If it was small enough it could land withoout much of a crater. At least here on earth most small meteors manage to land with out a huge impact crater.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    3. Re:Meteorite with no crater? by DrXym · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Maybe it hit water in some previous age and sunk to the bottom?

    4. Re:Meteorite with no crater? by Lars+T. · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So where are the craters here? All those meteorites lying around in the desert without a visible crater.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    5. Re:Meteorite with no crater? by posternutbaguk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It would travel slower, since Mars has a weaker gravitational field than Earth's, although it would suffer from less atmospheric drag. Air resistance is however equal to the square of the speed, so I think the result would still be a slower rock on Mars.

      Since we know force=mass*acceleration, the amount of energy hitting the ground would be dependant on the speed of the rock. Thus an identical rock hitting Earth would create a bigger crater.

    6. Re:Meteorite with no crater? by david.given · · Score: 3, Informative
      Anyone with more knowledge of meteor physics than me have an explanation?

      Meteors don't work like that, basically. What happens is that anything moving above a certain speed gets vapourised; shooting stars are. If it's large enough that it doesn't vapourise completely, what's left hits the ground at kilometres per second and makes a hell of a bang.

      However, anything moving slowly gets slowed to a stop by the atmosphere, at which point it just falls.

      The net effect is that meteors hit the ground either at kilometres per second or about two or three hundred miles per hour, and nothing in between.

    7. Re:Meteorite with no crater? by Mr2cents · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Opportunity isn't covered in dust also.. In fact, something has cleaned it's solar panels! Mayby it's just a good sign? Some laminar winds causing the removal of dust? Does the flat shape of meridiani cause winds that don't stir up surface dust? Just a thought.

      --
      "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
  12. Around the room reactions ... by WankersRevenge · · Score: 4, Funny

    Project leader Kenobi: it's not a rock. It's a space station

    Data Analyst Rimmer: Aliens!

    Computer Programmer Neo: Woaaah

    1. Re:Around the room reactions ... by 5n3ak3rp1mp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Any reference to Red Dwarf is priceless. Smeghead!

  13. Obvious. by Aaron+England · · Score: 3, Funny

    Charateristic topology, metal composition, scorched surroundings; clearly Mars is giving birth.

  14. Re:Somebody loose a probe? by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 2, Funny

    My guess is that it will turn out to be This.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  15. Monolith by vivin · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's the Monolith. Taa... taa... taaa...... TATAAAA!!!

    --
    Vivin Suresh Paliath
    http://vivin.net

    I like
    1. Re:Monolith by maxbang · · Score: 4, Funny

      Currently at NASA HQ: "Hold on, we're getting something here. All...these...worlds...are...a...fanta...don't...y ou...wanta...fanta? Fanta? What the hell is this?"

      --
      I also reply below your current threshold.
    2. Re:Monolith by jiggers069 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I, for one, welcome our new metal blob overlords.

  16. That's not a rock... by Tebriel · · Score: 3, Funny

    it's a Starbucks. They really ARE everywhere.

    --
    The Blaster Master Fighting for Truth, Justice, and Evil Pie since 1979
  17. Huh? by Richie1984 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I stress that this is very preliminary!

    Did this guy think that by saying that he would somehow prevent half of the internet preparing some crackpot theory within 5 seconds of reading it? :)

    Personally, I'll wait before jumping to conclusions, and look forward to reading the followup!

    --
    I'm not stressed. I'm just terribly, terribly alert.
  18. Re:A real mystery. by Rei · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is a big deal. You don't find raw metal much on Mars; most of it is tied up with oxygen. Raw metal has many implications: if it is common, it can be a great source of base building. If the metals are rare on Earth as well, and they're common on Mars, they could provide a potential export source. If it is a meteor, and they're common, it could affect our models of how often Mars gets struck by meteors. Since the rock isn't buried, it could provide clues as to how long it's been on Mars, how fast Meridiani Planum is eroding, and give us dataon how metals wear over time on Mars.

    Any time you find something you've never found before, it's a big deal. Honestly, to people who've been following the mission, it looked like Opportunity was pretty much wrapping things up. It just left a geological treasure trove and there isn't much more "on the map", so to speak. It's neat to see it continue making nice finds.

    --
    We're practicing our labials.
  19. What was their first reaction? by RobertB-DC · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So the NASA team has been poking around the planet for more than a(n Earth) year, right? Most of the surprises happened months ago... now it's just a matter of finding something to do until the batteries quit holding their charge. Looking at the heat shield doesn't seem like a very revealing bit of science -- more of a "gee look how far we've come" sort of cool thing.

    Then they get a picture of a big freaking rock with a bunch of wierd holes, sitting there in the middle of a windblown plain. Not covered in dust like everything else... even the wind patterns in the dust around it look new.

    What do you think the first guy to get that picture said when he looked, and then looked again, and realized that this wasn't going to be just another day on Mars?

    --
    Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    1. Re:What was their first reaction? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually, the Heat Shield WAS important.

      Designing re-entry shields for planets you don't know alot about ( compared to earth ) can be tricky. Undoubtably they overengineered it, and made it heavier than needed just in case.

      By examining the heat shield, and the thermal damage, they can get a better feel for the physical and thermal stresses caused by a martian re entry.

      This would lead to lighter, better heat shields. And since cost is proportional to weight, a lighter more effective heat shield leads to cheaper future mars missions, or allows one to cram more instruments into a probe. Either way, WIN!

      They are tooling around a planet we still know little about, so it's all good.

    2. Re:What was their first reaction? by Vellmont · · Score: 3, Informative


      Looking at the heat shield doesn't seem like a very revealing bit of science -- more of a "gee look how far we've come" sort of cool thing.

      You're right, looking at the heat shield isn't about science, but it is about engineering. The heat shield can obviously never be adequately tested, and until you take a look at it you never know exactly how well it performed. Were there areas where it could have failed? Was is over-engineered? Those are usefull questions that if we had answers to we could design better/more efficient heat shielding in the future.

      The heat shield also digs into the surface far more than the rovers ever could, so you might see whats below the surface. Though looking at the heat shield sounds like a total geek thing to do, it can reveal a lot of non obvious information.

      At this point you're probbably right about finding something to do. In the area where the rovers have landed we've seen the everyday stuff, and now it's all about being lucky enough to see the more rare things.

      --
      AccountKiller
    3. Re:What was their first reaction? by Tackhead · · Score: 2, Funny
      > Then they get a picture of a big freaking rock with a bunch of wierd holes, sitting there in the middle of a windblown plain. Not covered in dust like everything else... even the wind patterns in the dust around it look new.

      Goddamn battlecrabs.

      > What do you think the first guy to get that picture said when he looked, and then looked again, and realized that this wasn't going to be just another day on Mars?

      Probably something like "Yeah yeah. Thousands of years ago... Look, Delenn, I know you have to say this for the benefit folks just tuning in, but the rest of us know already!"

      Only to be smacked down with the fact that only one producer has survived a confrontation with Time-Warner and lived to tell about it.

    4. Re:What was their first reaction? by elliotCarte · · Score: 2, Funny

      By examining the heat shield, and the thermal damage, they can get a better feel for the physical and thermal stresses caused by a martian re entry.

      'Re entry'? Um... can an object re-enter an atmosphere in which it's never been?

      Damn, I forgot my close nitpicking tag. At least I didn't mention that 're-entry' is hypenated and 'Martian' is capitalized. Damn it, there I go again.

      In all fairness I do agree with what the parent said. I just like funning with the ACs.

      --
      If you can't just be yourself, then be more like me, ok?
  20. Re:A real mystery. by Rei · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I should also add that raw metal is very easy to mine. In fact, one proposal for lunar construction involves simply shipping up magnets and a machine that churns up regolith, since a small but significant percentage of lunar regolith is pure iron in powder form. Pure iron powder allows for powder metallurgy - while it's not quite as strong as cast iron (not that you need such strength on the moon), you can make almost any shape with it, with a high degree of detail, safety, low energy input, simple tools, and good speed.

    --
    We're practicing our labials.
  21. Mini-TES by A+Boy+and+His+Blob · · Score: 4, Informative

    For those of you who don't know what TES (Thermal Emission Spectrometer) is, here is some more information. The webpage is quite interesting.

    1. Re:Mini-TES by rk · · Score: 4, Informative

      For clarity: That link is to TES, which flies on the Mars Global Surveyor. The instrument on the rovers is called Mini-TES and does similar things.

      I work at the lab responsible for both.

  22. But what is this? by mowler2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    But what is this, that is next to the rock?

    Is it the heat shield?

    1. Re:But what is this? by damiangerous · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, it's the heat shield, which turned itself inside out. Here it is in color, from a different angle.

  23. Re:A real mystery. by Penguinshit · · Score: 3, Insightful


    The best part of the story is it seems that both the rovers will be continuing on for quite some time. Talk about a huge vat of gravy for this mission. It's really nice to see our taxpayer dollars repaid so handsomely.

    With the initial "water" find complete, these little critters are free to give us so much more information about Mars than we could have gotten with 50 Viking probes or any manner of orbiting system.

  24. I've got it by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 2, Funny

    it's a Martian coprolite! Now we can tell what they ate!

  25. Maybe it did leave a crater. by i41Overlord · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Maybe the rock did leave a crater in the sand millions of years ago, and the crater got blown away by the wind, leaving the heavy rock sitting there.

    Things can sit on the surface forever there. It's not like there's anyone there to say "ooh, this is shiny!" and disturb it. That's a human thing... (although now that human scientists sent a rover to Mars, they're saying "ooh, that rock is shiny!" and disturbing it)

  26. Re:Beagle? or maybe the Orbiter? by Kerhop · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If it's not the Beagle, it might be the Mars Climate Orbiter

  27. Don't touch with it! by AceCaseOR · · Score: 2, Funny

    If you tamper with it, you'll unleash demons from hell!!!!!!!

    --
    Zagreus sits inside your head, Zagreus lives among the dead, Zagreus sees you in your bed and eats you in your sleep.
  28. Clearly... by node+3 · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's a Horta.

  29. Martian Gold Rush? by Derling+Whirvish · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Maybe it's a gold nugget! And the race is on. Exploration in 2010, settlement in 2020, mining in 2030, colonization in 2040, terraforming in 2050 .... (although a source of liquid water would be more valuable kilo for kilo than gold).

  30. Re:Could it be the remains of predecessor or itsel by jdray · · Score: 4, Informative
    It could resaonably be an iron meteorite.

    "Iron meteorites", also called "irons", are usually just one big blob of iron-nickel (Fe-Ni) metal, as if it came from a industrial refinery without shaping. The alloy ranges from 5% to 62% nickel from meteorite to meteorite, with an average of 10% nickel. Cobalt averages about 0.5%, and other metals such as the platinum group metals, gallium, and germanium are dissolved in the Fe-Ni metal. (Fe is the chemical symbol for iron.) While most "irons" are pure or nearly pure metal, the technical definition of an "iron" includes metal meteorites with up to 30% mineral inclusions such as sulfides, metal oxides and silicates. The irons represent the cores of former planetoids.

    --
    The Spoon
    Updated 6/28/2011
  31. Read the small print by ptomblin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This object is not very far from other debris from the re-entry. It could very well turn out to be a chunk of something that got a bit melty on the way in.

    --
    The next Cmdr Taco duplicate will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and see it early!
  32. What? by Wrexen · · Score: 5, Funny

    Interesting find, but what's up with that caption?

    1. Re:What? by cephyn · · Score: 2, Funny

      OMG file that under the classic Fun With URLs folder!!

      --
      Moo.
  33. Everybody is missing the obvious by raitchison · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's a Uranium PU-36 Explosive Space Modulator of course.

    Heck it's even on the right planet

  34. Vamp vs Machine by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 4, Funny

    That's not that interesting looking - like most of the rest of Mars we've seen - except to planetologists. I find it interesting that the surface of Mars is so boring. That's because all the action is below the surface, where Mars is teeming with vampires . Once Opportunity takes the bait of probing that rock, setting off the alarms, the thin Martian air will be filled with flapping batwings. Our wisdom in sending a bloodless probe will pay off, as we'll have drawn them out into the rays of the sun, where our robot minions are a match for the weakened biters. I'll be playing the SOLASER across the face of the Red Planet this week, amplifying the beneficent rays of the Sun perhaps enough to make a difference. That is, if the vampire-controlled FAA doesn't stop me with their "laser-warning system" they've bankrolled on trumped-up terror propaganda.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  35. Re:If it's a meteorite, then where is the crater? by M1FCJ · · Score: 2, Informative
    Doesn't have to be there. The best best case scenario would be if it fell down when the area was under water. That would be really brilliant. You would get just a nice big splash.

    Even without water, it doesn't have to create a crater. It is quite small, such an object might not create a crater if it fell down at a shallow angle or low speed trajectory. Also probably it fell down billions of years ago, not last week. The crater might have eroded away, if it was too shallow (the rock looks approx. fist sized), it wouldn't have created a crater.

  36. NASA is really putting out lately... by Dejohn · · Score: 3, Insightful
    This is somewhat offtopic, but it seems that NASA is really getting a lot of good press for very interesting and successful projects. Good for them! Their public perception is really improving after those nasty probe failures on mars a while back.
    • Deep Impact launches to get data from a comet
    • BOTH Mars rover projects continue to be successful
    • Nasa nearing launch of shuttle again
    • Nasa planning Hubble robotic upgrade
    • Huygens "hours" from landing on Titan

    What a great time to be alive! I'm happy that my tax dollars are funding this stuff.
  37. By Occam, I think he's got it! by eckenheimer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The "object" is on the surface within a few meters of the heat shield. It's like nothing else the rovers have seen on Mars in over a year. I'd bet on Terrestrial origin. A "melty" chunk of the shield sounds about right. The surface pattern even resembles some of the texture of the shield material.

    --
    "When you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to reform." - Mark Twain
  38. Re:It can't be a burnt up vehicle, by KD5YPT · · Score: 2

    Um... Mars has an atmosphere. Just because its not very thick, doesn't mean its not going to have an effect on meteorites.

    --
    In US, you can easily buy enough major firearms to wipe out your neighbourhood but a few little fireworks are banned.
  39. Orbiters versus Rovers by rk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Don't fall into the trap of thinking that we get more data our of rovers than we do orbiters. Certainly a rover can give us very detailed data of a given area, but our knowledge of the regional and global characteristics of Mars come courtesy of our orbiter missions. The very landing sites picked were selected because of the data from these orbiters. Most of the rover data is relayed by the relay systems on the Mars Odyssey orbiter. I would say that rovers and orbiters complement each other nicely.

    Keep in mind that we've been roving on our planet since before the beginning of history, but we still get a lot of useful information out of orbiters around our world (Landsat, GOES, etc.), too.

  40. Looks photochopped by nxtr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I know its NASA and I know they wouldn't play tricks on us, but... it looks like it's a bad photoshop job. Anyone else with that impression?

  41. It's a diversion by CmdrGravy · · Score: 3, Funny

    Look ! Look at the shiny rock. In the meantime the Martians will be sneaking away behind them.

  42. Nice Idea, But Scotched By The Dunes by cmholm · · Score: 2, Informative
    That the "rock" might be a melted piece of aeroshell ain't a half bad idea, considering that the rest of the immediate surroundings are covered with crap from the impact. However, there are a few clues I think point away from that:

    the blob seems to be about the thickness of a good skipping stone, while the aeroshell is mostly honeycombed aluminum or titanium, made of metal sheets much the same thickness as a soda can.

    If enough Titanium melted from the aeroshell to make that one blob, it wouldn't be the only blob, and we wouldn't have enough rover left to take its picture.

    The rock is embedded in the dune such as to suggest wind has had time to blow the sand around it. Other evidence suggests that the various sand ripples you see haven't moved much in thousands of years. The grains in the surface crust are somewhat cemented together, and the thin Martain wind has a hell of a time moving a grain of sand, much less make an impression on the crust over the course of a year.

    --
    Luke, help me take this mask off ... Just for once, let me butterfly kiss you with my own eyes.
  43. Re:A real mystery. by mveloso · · Score: 2, Insightful



    Well, isn't everything on Mars something we've never found before? And how much of Mars is left?

    It may be a big deal to planetary people, but to the General Public it's just more banality dressed up as something exciting.

    Call when something interesting happens, like they figured out how the solar cells got cleaned off somehow and are generating more power.

  44. Re:I guess I don't get it... by mindbomb33 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Conversation with science student friend of mine: HIM: " . . . and that is what we hope to learn from my project." ME: "I don't understand." HIM: "Exactly."

    --






    --
    "You've only got one finger left,
    and it's pointing at the door."