Slashdot Mirror


Escape from the Universe

rleyton writes "Prospect Magazine is carrying an excellent article "Escape from the Universe": The universe is destined to end. Before it does, could an advanced civilisation escape via a "wormhole" into a parallel universe? The idea seems like science fiction, but it is consistent with the laws of physics and biology. Here's how to do it."

78 of 630 comments (clear)

  1. These people.... by FalconZero · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...have obviously never seen 'Sliders' .... otherwise they'd know better.

    --
    Windows in 6 Bytes (IA-32) : 90 90 90 90 CD 19
    1. Re:These people.... by Ploum · · Score: 2, Funny

      Why ? He had a better proposal to pass through a wormhole ?

    2. Re:These people.... by gordgekko · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Theory - The universe has existed for 13.7 billion years. It's a guess.

      Fact - The existence of Jesus Christ is generally accepted by all scholars.

      Please note, I'm an athiest but let's not go around making wild claims unless we want to turn science into a faith-based belief system.

      --
      You want to know who isn't running Firefox 2.x? They spell it "definately" and "rediculous".
    3. Re:These people.... by ScentCone · · Score: 3, Informative

      When you say "no end," do you mean that in terms of distance, or in terms of its ultimate disposition?

      Just a refresher on how we came up with the "big bang" notion: the things in the universe are spreading apart from one another in a very, very observable way. In fact, they're doing it faster and faster as time goes by. There is a lot of empty space, but it's sprinkled with lots of nice glowing objects that we can see and measure. You don't have to do much math to "rewind" the observed movement of those objects to see when everything that we can see would have been unimaginably close together and dense, and hence the age of the universe in which all of those things sit. As things get any closer or denser than that, there's really no point talking about time or distance, as you've reached an infinitely irreducable point, and the math shows that to have been roughly 13 billion years ago.

      Doesn't matter what happened, if anything, before then. "Before" isn't even a workable concept under those circumstances... all dimensions, including time, are compressed beyond recognition or measurement. The point is, it's just a bigger one of those word problems from school math... "A train from New York is in Baltimore going 50 miles per hour at 2:00, and has been accelerating steadily since it started in New York at X miles per hour per minute... what time did it leave New York?" If elementary students can mentally picture the problem and solve it, then given the (much more complex) observations of the actual universe around us, the math describing when our Universal Train left The Big Bang is pretty hard to miss.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    4. Re:These people.... by FalconZero · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, I'll conceded that the age of the Universe is estimated by the use of methods which we believe are accurate.
      I'll also give you that some dude, named 'Jesus' probably did exist circa 0AD, and was a really nice guy, and did some cool stuff that somehow got mangled in the storytelling, however he probably wasn't a supernatural being somehow linked to the fundamental nature of the universe.

      However, and this is the main thrust of my point, it is FAR AND AWAY more likely that the universe is 13.7 Billion years old and was not made in 7 days with humans at the beginning in the garden of eden, given that we have numerous self validating, and testable theorys about the universe, evolution, genetics, astrophysics, geophysics and planetary science, and ONE piece of self contradictory evidence about the existence of a supernatural 'Jesus' and his farther 'god' to whom we owe our existance.

      I should also point out that I am an agnostic, as I cannot prove or disprove the existence of God, therefore I cannot logically be Athiest. (And according to Christian beliefs, given 'god' is forgiving, I'm cool if he does exist - I die and go to heaven, though having given it more than five seconds of intelligent thought, I'm not holding my breath.)

      --
      Windows in 6 Bytes (IA-32) : 90 90 90 90 CD 19
    5. Re:These people.... by FalconZero · · Score: 2, Informative

      I get asked this over and over.
      It's IA-32 assembler (machine code for 32bit x86 PC's).
      90 - Machine code for 'do nothing'
      CD 19 - Machine code for 'call interrupt 19' which is roughtly 'reboot'

      --
      Windows in 6 Bytes (IA-32) : 90 90 90 90 CD 19
    6. Re:These people.... by FalconZero · · Score: 2, Funny

      God is forgiving if you accept the forgiveness
      At no point in my post did I say "I won't accept forgivness if offered". Hell, If god wants to send me an email demanding my repentance, my address is above. (And please no childish spoofed emails)

      --
      Windows in 6 Bytes (IA-32) : 90 90 90 90 CD 19
    7. Re:These people.... by Kozz · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Points well taken.

      There are a great many number of interpretations of Biblical writings depending on if you are Roman Catholic, Lutheran, Baptist, etc. Some believe in completely literal translation of the Bible. This, I believe, is something in which you find great fault (correct me if I am wrong). I'm not out to change your views, but for what it's worth, there are plenty that don't think that way.

      For example, I'm a member of a church in the Evangelical Lutheran Church of America (ELCA). Our particular interpretations are far more lenient, and do not at all suppose that concepts of evolution and science are mutually exclusive from Biblical teachings or faith. On the contrary, we believe God does indeed want us to use our intellect to understand these things.

      Of course, the ELCA is considered far more "liberal" than just about any other Christian faith you may find in the US. We have no problems ordaining homosexuals for leadership positions in the church (given a vow of celibacy*), as well as women for the same. Can't say that for the Catholics or Baptists, to be sure.

      This isn't meant to be a pro- or anti- religious post regarding any "Christian faith" in the US. I'm not out to change anybody's beliefs. Keep up the critical thinking! This was just meant to be somewhat informative. Hopefully you know something more than before you read my post.

      Cheers,
      --Kozz

      * My politics are more liberal than this, also. I'm not homophobic by any stretch. This is a statement about the ELCA policies, not my own personal beliefs.

      --
      I only post comments when someone on the internet is wrong.
    8. Re:These people.... by odano · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How many people before einstein do you think were forgotten? And how long do you think we will remember?

      When the library of alexandria was burned down, who knows all the information that was lost?

      What happens when the sun expands and earth can no longer hold life? Who is going to still be around remembering these things?

      I would say: Einstein ideas lived much longer than he did (as is the case with many famous people of the past 5 millenia). I would not say they are immortal.

    9. Re:These people.... by Torgo's+Pizza · · Score: 2, Informative

      If Jesus existed in 0AD then he's definitely in a wormhole of some sort, considering that isn't a valid year. The calendar goes from 1BC straight to 1AD. There is no Year Zero.

    10. Re:These people.... by John+Biggabooty · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, many non-western scholars suspect that no such person ever actually lived. He may be only a fictional character. Jesus is a matter of faith, not a matter of fact. Let's not spend any more time debating what we can't prove or disprove. Come to think of it, the question of wheter there are other universes is one of those. Maybe someone should Godwin this thread, so it will end.

      --
      That's Bigboo TAY! TAY!
    11. Re:These people.... by sl3xd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'll just say this: I like agnostics a lot more than athiests, that being said...

      Athiests are, in my opinion religious: They believe there is no God. They are as firm in this conviction as any Christian/Hindu/Muslim, etc. is in his/her believe that there is a God. Any statement to the contrary invokes a reaction quite similar to what a Christian would have when his beliefs are argued against, and there is a fair (if not large) amount of intolerance towards those whose beliefs are not identical.

      Agnostics, on the other hand, are far more open-minded. They are willing to see either way, and aren't going to immediately reject either, viewing both as a possibility, neither of which can be proven.

      But, in my view, agnostics also miss the point of religion entirely: To believe in something that is not known, and is not proveable by any known methods, and more importantly, to accept the fact that it may never be proveable at all.

      Mass insanity? Maybe. But most theoretical scientists proceed with some facts, but largely a belief that there is something there, and they work and act upon their beliefs (even if their theory may never be 'proven'). Scientists have invested billions of dollars and more than a few man-hours around the ideas of the 'standard model' of particles, or to join the standard model with quantum physics using these things called 'strings'. Yet they plod on, sustained by their belief that some good may come of their research.

      Einstein's theory of relativity is a great example: He worked on it, argued about it, etc. But he never lived to see it 'proven'. In fact, he stated himself that it may never be proven, and that a single event can disprove it entirely. But the belief that he was right, and the evidence that seemed to support the theory brought it both recognition and acceptance. It is accepted as fact to a large enough extent that it is still used today.

      I see religion as a similar thing: It's important to believe that we are, and can become, more than a sentient animal. It's important to aspire more than we are -- even if there is no possible way to prove we are more than a sentient animal. Most religions attempt to do get its followers to do this, and do it so well that they have lasted millenia. The particular way a religion may improve a person may not be to everybody's liking (it usually isn't). But your morning meal probably isn't to everybody's liking either.

      --
      -- Sometimes you have to turn the lights off in order to see.
  2. neat but.... by zxnos · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... wouldnt a parallel universe be frozen too?

    --
    always mosh clockwise
    1. Re:neat but.... by roseblood · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The idea behind paralell universes are that they are smilar to our own, but slightly diffrent, say, way back when Pangea was the place to be a meteor landed and cracked the mega continent, and in certain paralell universe the metor hit, but didn't crack the continent due to some serious english being placed on the rock when it fell (or whatever bullshit thing you can think of.) Fastforward 100million years and the dinosar killing rock hits ocean instead of land, so the big die-off isn't so big. Fastforward another 200 million, and dinosaurs still rule the earth and men still look like squirles. Small changes far back can mean a big thing today. Think using 2 bytes to store the value of a year vs 4. That's a y2k problem, or no y2k problem. It all would depend on when the parallel universes diverged, and the degree of divengence. A big diffrence only a few years old and you might not notice a diffrence in the overall universe, but a small diffrence that occured way back in the begining (like..oh..say... durring the big bang there was a discarded mayonase sanwich laying about.)

      --
      There are lies, damned lies, and statistics.
    2. Re:neat but.... by zxnos · · Score: 2, Insightful
      right, right

      i am down with all of that, like stepping on a butterfly while on a time travel dinosaur hunting trip...

      anyway, wouldnt all the parallel universes be the same age and thus have reached the same amount of entropy?

      --
      always mosh clockwise
  3. With my luck... by meckardt · · Score: 4, Funny

    With my luck, the parallel universe that I escaped into would be even closer to ending than this one...

    1. Re:With my luck... by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 5, Funny

      Or,
      filled with studio executives and sycophantic DRM vendors.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
  4. Stephen Baxter by angrist · · Score: 3, Informative

    Haven't even loaded TFA yet, but the idea sounds VERY similar to the premise of Stephen Baxter's book "Ring"......

    an excellent read if you get the chance.

  5. Isn't this a bit early? by BerntB · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Couldn't we wait a few billions of years before we start consider this question seriously?

    --
    Karma: Excellent (My Karma? I wish...:-( )
    1. Re:Isn't this a bit early? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Typical spineless shortsighted politician once again dumping our serious problems into the laps of our greatE+9(grandchildren)

    2. Re:Isn't this a bit early? by Dominic+Burns · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "I think a more pressing problem is limited habitability of Earth -- thousand years, tops?

      I reckon you're way off the mark.

      With the tools we have at the moment and the way we're handling them, I reckon we've got 50-odd years at the outside...assuming there isn't some catastrophic event between now and then, that is.

      :)

  6. Because, you know... by agraupe · · Score: 4, Funny

    This was one of my biggest concerns! I mean, the universe could end tomorrow, and we'd be completely unprepared! I am so incredibly important that I must escape via a wormhole before the universe ends, so I may help... other such people... uh... get back to me.

    1. Re:Because, you know... by saintp · · Score: 4, Funny
      This was one of my biggest concerns!
      Mine, too, but thankfully now the Department of Homeworld Security has introduced their new color-coded Spontaneous-Collapse-of-the-Universe Warning System. Today is yellow!
    2. Re:Because, you know... by Wavicle · · Score: 2, Funny

      End the universe on me once, shame on - shame on you. You can't end the universe on me again!

      --
      Education is a better safeguard of liberty than a standing army.
      Edward Everett (1794 - 1865)
  7. antimatter by gollum123 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    what if the parallel universe you pop out through the wormhole into is made completely of antimatter.

    1. Re:antimatter by Too+Much+Noise · · Score: 4, Funny

      what if the parallel universe you pop out through the wormhole into is made completely of antimatter.

      No problem, it will just be an escape towards a really bright future.

    2. Re:antimatter by eggz128 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Dont touch ANYTHING!

  8. Oops, we did it again by bloggins02 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think Prospect Magazine's web server just escaped into another universe.

    1. Re:Oops, we did it again by FalconZero · · Score: 4, Informative

      Article Text from :
      http://prospectmagazine.co.uk/article_details.php? id=6701

      Lifted at :
      22:00 20/01/05

      The universe is out of control, in a runaway acceleration. Eventually all intelligent life will face the final doom--the big freeze. An advanced civilisation must embark on the ultimate journey: fleeing to a parallel universe.


      In Norse mythology, Ragnarok--the fate of the gods--begins when the earth is caught in the vice-like grip of a bone-chilling freeze. The heavens themselves freeze over, as the gods perish in great battles with evil serpents and murderous wolves. Eternal darkness settles over the bleak, frozen land as the sun and moon are both devoured. Odin, the father of all gods, finally falls to his death, and time itself comes to a halt.


      Does this ancient tale foretell our future? Ever since the work of Edwin Hubble in the 1920s, scientists have known that the universe is expanding, but most have believed that the expansion was slowing as the universe aged. In 1998, astronomers at the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and the Australian National University calculated the expansion rate by studying dozens of powerful supernova explosions within distant galaxies, which can light up the entire universe. They could not believe their own data. Some unknown force was pushing the galaxies apart, causing the expansion of the universe to accelerate. Brian Schmidt, one of the group leaders, said, "I was still shaking my head, but we had checked everything... I was very reluctant to tell people, because I truly thought that we were going to get massacred."


      Physicists went scrambling back to their blackboards and realised that some "dark energy" of unknown origin, akin to Einstein's "cosmological constant," was acting as an anti-gravity force. Apparently, empty space itself contains enough repulsive dark energy to blow the universe apart. The more the universe expands, the more dark energy there is to make it expand even faster, leading to an exponential runaway mode.


      In 2003, this astonishing result was confirmed by the WMAP (Wilkinson microwave anisotropy probe) satellite. Orbiting at a million miles from earth, this satellite contains two telescopes capable of detecting the faint microwave radiation which bathes the universe. It is so sensitive that it is able to photograph in exquisite detail the afterglow of the microwave radiation left over from the big bang, which is still circulating the universe. The WMAP satellite, in effect, gave us "baby pictures" of the universe when it was a mere 380,000 years old.


      The WMAP satellite settled the long-standing question of the age of the universe: it is officially 13.7bn years old (to within 1 per cent accuracy). But more remarkably, the data showed that dark energy is not a fluke, but makes up 73 per cent of the matter and energy of the entire universe. To deepen the mystery, the data showed that 23 per cent of the universe consists of "dark matter," a bizarre form of matter which is invisible but still has weight. Hydrogen and helium make up 4 per cent, while the higher elements, you and I included, make up just 0.03 per cent. Dark energy and most of dark matter do not consist of atoms, which means that, contrary to what the ancient Greeks believed and what is taught in every chemistry course, most of the universe is not made of atoms at all.


      As the universe expands, its energy content is diluted and temperatures eventually plunge to near absolute zero, where even atoms stop moving. One of the iron laws of physics is the second law of thermodynamics, which states that in the end everything runs down, that the total "entropy" (disorder or chaos) in the universe always increases. This means that iron rusts, our bodies age and crumble, empires fall, stars exhaust their nuclear fuel, and the universe itself will run down, as temperatures drop uniformly to near zero.


      Charles Darwin was referring to this law when he wrote: "Beli

      --
      Windows in 6 Bytes (IA-32) : 90 90 90 90 CD 19
    2. Re:Oops, we did it again by dabigpaybackski · · Score: 3, Funny
      Why am I not surprised that Norse mythology foretells a final, freezing doom for god and man alike? This is from the society that drinks 11% alcohol beer during their eight-month winters.

      Oh, and they produce a wildly disproportionate number of the world's death metal bands.

      --
      "OH SHIT, THERE'S A HORSE IN THE HOSPITAL!"
  9. Are we asking questions just to sound smart? by pchan- · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The universe is destined to end. Before it does, could an advanced civilisation escape via a "wormhole" into a parallel universe?

    No. Anything that is reacheable from our universe is, by definition, part of the universe. The concept of "escape" has no meaning in this context.

    1. Re:Are we asking questions just to sound smart? by meringuoid · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Anything that is reacheable from our universe is, by definition, part of the universe. The concept of "escape" has no meaning in this context.

      OK, then redefine 'universe'. After all, an atom can't be split; that's what the word 'atom' means... Just come up with a new word for the larger structure, and don't worry too much about Greek derivations.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    2. Re:Are we asking questions just to sound smart? by Soko · · Score: 5, Funny

      No. Anything that is reacheable from our universe is, by definition, part of the universe.

      Well, the webserver is, at this exact point in time in this universe, unreachable. If your definition is assumed to be correct, that server is not part of this universe.

      That would mean that the Slashdot Effect can blow a server to an alternate universe (or at least give it an alternate quantum state).

      Soko

      --
      "Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm." - Anonymous
    3. Re:Are we asking questions just to sound smart? by DeadVulcan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Anything that is reacheable from our universe is, by definition, part of the universe. The concept of "escape" has no meaning in this context.

      Well, we're playing with definitions here. By your definition of "universe," it's still possible to conceive that we could escape from our current "region" of the universe - which is dying - through a wormhole, to another "region" that is not so close to dying.

      It just presupposes that maybe the "universe" is much bigger than we currently think, and there's a way to traverse from one "region" to another, and different regions are "dying" at different rates.

      --
      Accountability on the heads of the powerful.
      Power in the hands of the accountable.
  10. How to do it: by meringuoid · · Score: 5, Funny
    1: Build a Great Attractor
    2: Suck up thousands of galaxies into a toroidal naked singularity
    3: Avoid any pesky humans throwing relativistic neutron stars around the universe
    4: Hold off neutrino birds at all costs
    5: Escape universe

    Potential hazards: physical constants of new universe may not be what you expected. Beware of ultra-high gravity.

    --
    Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    1. Re:How to do it: by FlimFlamboyant · · Score: 2, Funny

      1: Build a Great Attractor 2: Suck up thousands of galaxies into a toroidal naked singularity 3: Avoid any pesky humans throwing relativistic neutron stars around the universe 4: Hold off neutrino birds at all costs 5: Escape universe

      PFFT! *hits the switch on his improbability drive*

      --
      But God demonstrates his love for us, in that while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us - (Romans 5:8)
    2. Re:How to do it: by Dixie_Flatline · · Score: 2, Informative
      The least you could do is tell people what story you're referring to.


      Vacuum Diagrams is a collection of short stories about a race called the Xeelee, and how humanity discovers them, moves to the stars and is nearly destroyed. The stories have an epic scope - several million years - but are quite entertaining. One of the most enjoyable reads I've ever had.


      I'd describe what a 'great attractor' or 'neutrino birds' are, but that would give a way a lot of the story.

    3. Re:How to do it: by roseblood · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, he's referring to RING, also by Stephen Baxter, and part of the Xeelee sequence. Vacumm Diagrams is just a collection of short stories rounded up into one volume. Still an entertaining read :)

      --
      There are lies, damned lies, and statistics.
    4. Re:How to do it: by oGMo · · Score: 2, Funny
      Or the wrong ratio of forces, causing all the matter in your body to explode at whatever the speed of light happens to be in those parts.

      I believe this only happens if you cross the beams. Don't do that.

      --

      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage

  11. Ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Escape from the Universe" commented on by people who haven't figured out how to escape their parent's basements.

  12. The Plot of Greg Egan's Diaspora by Cr0w+T.+Trollbot · · Score: 2, Interesting
    In Greg Egan's Diaspora, uploaded post-human intelligences find out that a huge gamma-ray burster is going to go off in the middle of the galaxy, and make plans to migrate to a higher geometry of spacetime. The novel stretches from a few centuries hence all the way to 90000 trillion (IIRC) subjective years in the future, after the protagonists have automated the process of migrating to other spacetime geometries, and only have the consciousness awakened every 1000th translation or so...

    Not Egan's best (though it does include the brilliant "Wang's Carpets"), but worth reading.

    - Crow T. Trollbot

  13. duh... by gralem · · Score: 3, Funny

    The idea seems like science fiction, but it is consistent with the laws of physics and biology. Here's how to do it.

    The short answer: Find worm hole. Jump into said wormhole. Escape universe. I mean, this is pretty basic stuff here.

    ---gralem

  14. Meanwhile on Earth... by henrik · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... people are starving. Great people spend time thinking of current problems.

    1. Re:Meanwhile on Earth... by lobsterGun · · Score: 2, Insightful

      OOOO! OOOOh! I know this one!!!

      Because there is no money in it!

      WooHoo! Where do collect my prize money?

    2. Re:Meanwhile on Earth... by metlin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh yeah. Excellent attitude.

      I mean, why bother sending all those probes to learn about the Universe when we all could be busy farming to produce more food. Bring down those buildings and rear more cattle so that can can feed everyone.

      Get over it. Just because there is a section of underprivileged population does not mean you do not work on other things. Civilization is a cumulative point of achievement of everything that's happened before it - unless you can provide for that, you're not going to progress.

      Sure, the Universe is not going to end tomorrow. But if we did try and understand it better, we might stumble upon something cool (like building wormholes or faster-than-light travel). That might probably change our lives a lot more.

      And tomorrow if we are spread out there in the galaxy and a piece of rock decides to knock Earth off our solar system, you might just have saved the species.

      Science just is. Just because there are other problems does not mean you do not do science.

      I'll quote something from HL Mencken that seems apt -

      The value the world sets upon motives is often grossly unjust and inaccurate. Consider, for example, two of them: mere insatiable curiosity and the desire to do good. The latter is put high above the former, and yet it is the former that moves one of the most useful men the human race has yet produced: the scientific investigator. What actually urges him on is not some brummagem idea of Service, but a boundless, almost pathological thirst to penetrate the unknown, to uncover the secret.... His prototype is not the liberator releasing slaves, the good Samaritan lifting up the fallen, but a dog sniffing tremendously at an infinite series of rat-holes.
      -- H. L. Mencken


      While it is unfortunate that there are so many underprivileged people, it is unfair to stifle science with that as an excuse.

  15. This is my third universe.... by coyote-san · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is the third universe and things are definitely going downhill. Why, back in the day you never had stars spew their guts all over space and call it a "supernova." If they did they had the courtesy to clean up after themselves.

    And don't get me started on those noisy pulsars or horrid black holes! I can't think of anything that sucks as much as black holes!

    --
    For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. -- H L Mencken
    1. Re:This is my third universe.... by meringuoid · · Score: 2, Funny
      Why, back in the day you never had stars spew their guts all over space and call it a "supernova." If they did they had the courtesy to clean up after themselves.

      Life was much better in the quark-gluon era. It was warm back then, with none of these howling great voids of nothing. I'm just hanging around watching Eta Carinae in the hope that it'll explode and I can catch some nice warm neutrinos to keep out the bitter cold...

      Whoever decided to press the button on the Inflation Device really needs kicking. Worst idea in the history of the universe, I swear!

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  16. Why don't we worry about escape Earth first by syousef · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What's the point in theorizing about escaping the Universe when it expires, when we haven't even set up a permanent base outside Earth orbit??? Might be fun to think about but that's about it.

    There will be cataclysms on Earth, and in our solar system long before, which we need to avoid. Hell we don't even have a decent early warning system for large meteors, let alone a workable action plan against being wiped out by one.

    This isn't like trying to fly before you can walk. This is more like sperm in a testicle trying to plan for when it becomes an Olympic athelete!

    --
    These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  17. But Who Will Get.. by wildsurf · · Score: 2, Funny

    ..Last Post?

    --
    Weeks of coding saves hours of planning.
  18. Something to think about... by SeaDour · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If there are an infintie number of parallel universes, why aren't there an infinite number of wormholes opening all over the place in our universe?

    1. Re:Something to think about... by aztektum · · Score: 4, Funny

      Because they have yet to RTFA

      --
      :: aztek ::
      No sig for you!!
    2. Re:Something to think about... by mpaque · · Score: 2, Insightful
      If there are an infintie number of parallel universes, why aren't there an infinite number of wormholes opening all over the place in our universe?

      There just might be.. Oh, not an infinite number, but one of those really, really big numbers, followed by lots and lots of zeros.

      Oh, and the wormholes are small. Really small. Mind-bogglingly small. About a Planck length. And they don't go very far. Probably not to another universe.

    3. Re:Something to think about... by Armatich_Defiant · · Score: 3, Informative

      An interesting observation..

      Keep in mind that there are there are different "sizes" of infinity ("proof" below). If you accept this, you can accept that having an infinite number of universes and an infinite number of universe bridging wormholes, does not imply an infinite number of wormholes in each universe.

      Notes

      1) Using a digitalization argument you can show that the number of whole numbers is "countably infinite" while the number of real numbers (fractional numbers) is "uncountably infinite". And thus the infinite set of real numbers is larger than the infinite set of whole numbers.

      2) Note 1/2 of infinity (e.g. even numbers) is still equal in size to infinity (e.g. all whole numbers). We're talking cardinality here.

      3) See http://planetmath.org/encyclopedia/CantorsDiagonal Argument.html

    4. Re:Something to think about... by Epistax · · Score: 2, Insightful

      sigh.. I see this again and again.

      Ok let's say you have 1 object, and there's a 100% chance it's an object that's going to open up a wormhole into your universe. Now make it 2 and 50% (independent events). Now make it 4 and 25%, now make it a billion with a chance of 1/billion. Now make it an infinite number of objects, each with an infinitesimal chance of opening up a wormhole in your universe. What does this number approach? (Hint: Not infinity)

  19. I'll wait by TrippTDF · · Score: 3, Funny

    The idea seems like science fiction, but it is consistent with the laws of physics and biology. Here's how to do it."

    I'll wait until "Escaping your Universe for Dummies" comes out... that's always easy to read.

  20. I'm just gonna make reservations at Milliways... by PornMaster · · Score: 4, Funny

    When the universe explodes for my pleasure, I want to be downing Pan-Galactic Gargle Blasters.

  21. Earlier Story by dwbassett42 · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Author, Michio Kaku, also had essentially the exact same article in the December issue of Discover. The article is right here. Very interesting read, but the engineer in me makes me laugh at the sheer impracticality if the possible methods.

    www.owlsden.com/moroha

  22. Don't mean to crash the party but... by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 4, Informative
    Didn't Stephen Hawking say recently that there is no possibility of using black holes to travel to other universes?

    Quote:

    Hawking presented his solution to the 17th International Conference on General Relativity and Gravitation in Dublin. ...
    Hawking also dismisses his previous suggestion that the information might have leaked into a different "Baby" universe. "The information remains firmly in our universe," he told the conference. "I am sorry to disappoint science fiction fans, but if information is preserved, there is no possibility of using black holes to travel to other universes. If you jump into a black hole, your mass energy will be returned to our universe, but in a mangled form which contains the information about what you were like, but in an unrecognisable state.
    (Emphasis mine)
    1. Re:Don't mean to crash the party but... by QuantumG · · Score: 2, Informative

      You know that a black hole and a worm hole are two different suggestions of which is a possible shape of space according to general relativity right? If you really want to say that worm holes are just silly, all you need to do is look at a single component of a worm hole that is necessary for it to function: exotic matter. There is no reason to believe that exotic matter exists. There has been no observed phenomona which suggests that exotic matter could exist. There's a lot of reason to believe that negative energy is just a silly concept. Finally, any hope that we have to make worm holes will not be until we have mastered stellar engineering. I can't even hazard a guess as to when that will be, can you?

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    2. Re:Don't mean to crash the party but... by Calroth · · Score: 2, Informative

      Didn't Stephen Hawking say recently that there is no possibility of using black holes to travel to other universes?

      It's true (well, for a given value of "true"), but black holes aren't the same things as wormholes. Wormholes are a quantum concept (in the sense that they're really really small) where you get to travel between different bits of spacetime by taking shortcuts. Did I say they're really really small? We're talking mind-boggling sub-sub-sub-atomic here.

      Black holes are just huge chunks of mass (think ultra-massive stars) which have collapsed under their own gravity.

      I am not a physicist so it's all been dumbed down, and is possibly completely wrong, any real physicists are invited to make corrections.

    3. Re:Don't mean to crash the party but... by TexVex · · Score: 4, Informative

      String theory indicates that black holes are not singularities, and their event horizons are fuzzy. They are not holes, but balls of strings compressed to the maximum possible density the universe will allow. In other words, every quantum state inside a black hole is filled. Black holes aren't composed of anything resembling matter or energy we recognize. However, information about what the matter was before becoming part of the black hole remains encoded in the (extradimensional) vibrations of the strings. Slowly, over time, the black hole gives up its strings (and the information they contained) from the fuzzy event horizon, until it evaporates.

      So, one way to look at it is, if you jump into a black hole you'll be transformed into the tiny vibrating strings that make up subatomic particles according to String Theory, then those strings will be flung off in randomly over time in the form of Hawking radiation.

      That would be a cool thing to do with your corpse, much like having your body cremated and your ashes scattered.

      --
      Fun with Anagarams! LADS HOST, SHALT DOS. HAS DOLTS. AD SLOTHS, HATS SOLD. ASS HO, LTD.
  23. Laws of Biology ? by cyberfunk2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "is consistant with the laws of physics and biology."

    What pray tell are the "laws of biology" and how do they have ANYTHING to do with wormholes?

  24. Fractions of Infinity by Planesdragon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Imagine a circle infinitely large.

    Now cut it in half, cut one of its halfs in half, and cut one of those quarters in half.

    How big are the smallest two sections you have? Infinitly big. Or, to be precise, 1/8 infinity.

    Similar math is what keeps wormholes from happening all over the place. With infinite space then, yes, we would have an infinite number of wormholes. But their ratio wouldn't necessarily change from the effect if we had, oh, a finite space.

  25. Definine "our universe" by Infonaut · · Score: 3, Informative
    Anything that is reacheable from our universe is, by definition, part of the universe.

    As you can see, it's not easy to come to agreement about what the term "our universe" actually means. A term this broad invites all manner of semantic arguments

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
  26. Visit to a Strange Universe by WCityMike · · Score: 4, Funny

    Before it does, could an advanced civilisation escape via a "wormhole" into a parallel universe?

    Now why would I want to do that? With my luck, I'd wind up in a universe where we had President George W. Bush, instead of Al Gore beginning his second term.

    Yeesh. What a terrifying concept ...

    1. Re:Visit to a Strange Universe by Lost+Penguin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You probably would have increasing unemployment and no World Trade Center in a universe with a lying Texan president with strong ties to Saudi terrorists.

      Yeah, and the Russians and Chinese would be rearming with very real stratigic WMDs.

      --
      I am the unwilling control for my Origin.
    2. Re:Visit to a Strange Universe by CSG_SurferDude · · Score: 4, Funny

      Wouldn't that be better than this one?

      I mean, President Clinton wasn't that bad, even if her husband was a bit of a jerk.

  27. notes? by brit74 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'd take notes, but with my luck there would be very little chance that I'd be able to find them again in 10 billion years when I need them.

  28. is escape necessary? by Darth_Burrito · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I haven't read the article, but (assuming infinite expansion) presumably the issue with the universe ending is with everything approaching entropy. In other words, we lose accessible energy. If we can escape to another universe, who's to say we can't steal some other universe's energy to keep our own universe kicking. It's Mega Maid!!! She's gone from suck to blow! (or vice versa in this case).

    I'm afraid I've grown rather attached to this universe.

  29. escapism by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Informative

    Though the wormhole route is explored most engagingly in Greg Egan's Diaspora, I prefer the Total Perspective Vortex in H2G2.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  30. It's later than you think! by fm6 · · Score: 2, Funny

    But at the rate we're going we'll be extinct in a century or so. We have to work on this problem now, while we're still around!

  31. Re:Yeah Right by Anonymous+Writer · · Score: 2, Funny

    We will definately not be still alive by the time the universe ends.

    Did Netcraft confirm that?

  32. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  33. Obligatory Hitchhiker's Guide by IthnkImParanoid · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...and then there are some who believe this has already happened....

    --
    It's nothing but crumpled porno and Ayn Rand.
  34. Escape from the Basement by Chris+Burke · · Score: 5, Funny

    Many geeks are aware of the fact that their parent's basements will not last forever. While many say this is both far off and inevitable and thus not worth worrying about, a growing number of geek researchers are treating the issue seriously, and turning to advanced physics for a solution.

    Under some theories, there is not just one parent's basement, but in fact many basements. In this "multi-basement" view, it would even be possible to travel from one basement to another.

    The theory states that up the stairs and through the kitchen there are portals that lead to a realm given the mysterious sounding name of "Outside". And indeed, it is mysterious.

    "We know virtually nothing about 'Outside'," said a prominent geek theorist whose name I'm too lazy to make up. "The theory states that one could travel through 'Outside' to any other place in the known basements, but we aren't sure how that is possible. Certainly it would be a place of astounding energy. While still purely theory, one of my colleagues sent me an IM claiming that he actually saw this energy shining through the windows of the kitchen when he went upstairs to get lunch."

    While agreeing with the general theory, several researchers say that Outside provides no hope to the geek facing the destruction of his basement. The incredible energy of Outside, they say, would fry a geek in an instant. One said clearly fabricated claims that some geeks had already travelled Outside and returned was proof that the theory was the realm of crackpots.

    "There are certainly difficulties involved in traveling Outside," said that same geek from before, "but we've found nothing insurmountable as of yet. I've calculated that the energy of Outside waxes and wanes in approximately twelve hour cycles and travel would be possible during the low portion of the cycle. Frankly, I think these theoretical problems will be overcome. I'd be much more concerned about the practical implications of traveling to other basements, such as: if there are no parents in these new basements, who will pay rent and fill the fridge? What if there is no Chinese or pizza delivery? These are the issues engineers will have to face as they travel to new worlds beyond the kitchen."

    While all geeks we spoke with admitted that it is far too early to draw any conclusions, many said that this new field of research should give geeks everywhere hope.

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  35. Internets by Wizarth · · Score: 2, Funny

    Does IPv6 have a large enough adress space for the parallel universes? Will I be able to escape and still browse Slashdot? Will I be able to grab the last of my Torrents off my server before the universe collapses?

  36. Read the whole article by macdaddy357 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I just read the whole article. Wow man! That's some heavy shit. By the way, would somebody pass the bong?

    --
    How ya like dat?
  37. Re:Done. by fyngyrz · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Actually, it has been done. Long ago, by Pohl Anderson in "Tau Zero", a truly wonderful SF work that turns a space drive accident into about as plausable a "get to-and-through the end of the universe" tale as you're ever likely to read.

    If you're an SF fan, FWIW, this recommendation is from an owner of a SF-specialized literary agency and the son of a SF writer popular from the 50's... 70's or so. If the idea of creation-spanning is interesting to you, then read this book; you are very unlikely to regret it.

    The social mileau in the book will feel a trifle dated; the science won't.

    --
    I've fallen off your lawn, and I can't get up.