Slashdot Mirror


Steam Users Steamed

KrunchTime writes "The Steam network seems to be having some problems tonight. This is not good new for fans of counter-strike, day of defeat and other half-life mods. Some people seem to be able to log on fine while others, like me :(, cannot connect at all. The steam forums were filling up with invective when I was last able to get on. The forums now seem to have imploded under the strain of complaints. The question that was being asked most is why there isn't more redundancy on the log-in side of steam. They say that if one of the master servers goes down that the accounts held there become unavailable immediately. The other big problem is that while the Steam network is down even the offline games are unplayable. There was no sign of responses from Valve staff or forum moderators."

18 of 881 comments (clear)

  1. OMFG!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    And on a Saturday night, no less! Mothers, lock up your daughters! Smithers in on the town!

    01000110 01010000

    1. Re:OMFG!! by pr0nsurf3r · · Score: 5, Funny

      Steam is down? the horror!

      Yup. Its a sign from g0d! Climb out of the basement or your sad little room and go out and do something. Who knows, maybe the stars will line up and you might actually get laid. If you meet the right person you might even get to try some "taunts" out in real life. Watch out though, chances are you'll going to here more than one h0ttie say "go frag yourself."

    2. Re:OMFG!! by EpsCylonB · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Serious point though, imagine buying a DVD and sitting down to watch it (saturday night or whenever) and not being able to because first it needs to connect to a authentification server which isn't working properly.

      No consumer should have to put up with this ridiculous treatment. The fact that gamers do is just one symptom of how strange the game industry is. Valve are definitely one of the best examples of this, still no one can exaplain to me the reason for the original false start september 2003 HL2 release date. Why is it that Gabe Newell, the team leader, didn't know that the game was no where near being finished when he annouced that date ?. Why did he go on to make a deal with ATI to include HL2 with their video cards when those cards would be a year out of date by the time of the games' eventual release ?.

      Any other industry and people wouldn't put up with such asshatery, why us gamers do I don't know.

  2. FYI by Associate · · Score: 5, Informative
    Fresh from the Steampowered forums:
    If your Steamid starts with 0:0 you should be able to login with no problems. If your steamid starts with 0:1 then it won't work. 0:1 Auth servers are down.
    --
    Someone hates these cans.
  3. You (don't) get what you (don't) pay for. by mythosaz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I have a copy of HL2. I got it when I bought my Athlon 64, but I "paid" for it nonetheless. But, as we all been reminded, I don't "own" anything. I didn't even get a DVD. I have the license to play HL2 at the whimsey of Valve. If Valve feels like letting me play, I can play. If Valve feels like taking the weekend off when their servers go down, I can't play.

    If I hadn't gotten it for free with my CPU, I wouldn't have "bought" it at all; their license is simply idiotic.

    Mind you, I respect their rights to have such an idiotic license...

    1. Re:You (don't) get what you (don't) pay for. by Dioxin+Dude · · Score: 5, Informative

      Try going Steamless

  4. Ugh... by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The other big problem is that while the Steam network is down even the offline games are unplayable.

    I hope this shows more people why they need to resist DRM schemes.

    1. Re:Ugh... by tftp · · Score: 5, Insightful
      The question is why should you be pirating it if its crap?

      It's a wrong argument in this debate because the cracked HL2 is better than the legitimate one.

  5. Offline games require online reporting = BOGUS by tambo · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The other big problem is that while the Steam network is down even the offline games are unplayable.

    Absolutely. This is the most insane thing about Steam: When I can't reach Steam - either because it's down, or because I happen to be in a location with no network access (which, in fact, is a common scenario) - I can't play the offline games I purchased. Like Half-Life 2. And Counter-Strike: Condition Zero. Even Codename Gordon - a dinky freeware platformer, reminiscent of id software's classic game Abuse - is unplayable.

    So I paid $80 for package including many excellent single-player games, but I can't play any of them without getting express consent from Valve every time. When that consent is unavailable, I can't play the games I bought. This is bogus. This is outrageous.

    I cannot imagine how this possibly benefits Valve in any way. Surely the p1r@t3s who don't wanna pay (na na why don't you get a job?) are merrily playing their hacked-installer versions. All this mechanism accomplishes is giving the pointy-headed marketroids at Valve some academic (useless) data on who plays which games. Meanwhile, actual customers get surveilled, and sometimes denied access to their paid-for games.

    In sum, this scheme presents spurious value to Valve, and no value to customers, while also pissing customers off. Valve is too smart a company not to realize this. Why they persist is a fucking mystery.

    - David Stein

    --
    Computer over. Virus = very yes.
  6. Offline can still work by doofer · · Score: 5, Informative
    The other big problem is that while the Steam network is down even the offline games are unplayable.

    This is only half-true.
    Once Half-Life 2 is decrypted and fully running, it is possible to set it to be playable offline, hence not needing an internet connection to run it, and the original single player games can be played from their original applications, not through steam.
    1. Re:Offline can still work by PedanticSpellingTrol · · Score: 5, Insightful
      ....it is possible to set it to be playable offline...

      Why the fuck should anyone have to jump through hoops to play a fucking single-player game offline? That should be the default setting. How many people even know about this? I'm sure valve wouldn't publicize it, lest they have everyone going around using the software that they paid for without asking "oh please sir, may I have some more" and denying them valuable usage statistics!

  7. Re:That's what you get! by Maestro4k · · Score: 5, Insightful
    • A 'logon once a week' scheme would probably ease these troubles, but otherwise I don't see how any of my rights are being squished.
    Simple, if Valve goes out of business tomorrow and the login servers go down, all your games you paid for stop working permanently. With discs and CD Keys, you can hunt them down and reinstall, even if the company's gone out of business and your CDs are in storage.
  8. Re:The better have one HELL of an excuse! by _KiTA_ · · Score: 5, Funny

    By clicking accept on the EULA, which you had to do in order to install and create the account, you signed away any rights to actually play the game. The fact that you actually get to, usually, play it is a happy accident.

  9. Fun at a lan party by Anamanaman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm at a lan party right now (400 people / www.lanpartynw.com). I was banging my head for the last 5 hours as to why I cant play counterstrike. I must have done a million firewall, system tweaks since I figured it HAD to be my computer since some people next to me have no problem logging in while I saw one person who has the same problem. The lan party is supposed to be steam enabled so they have a link up to the auth servers.

    And now I see the slashdot article. (Browsing the net using my cell phone as a modem trying to find a solution to this steam problem).

    Really, I'm pissed. Not only do they force this crap down our throat, but they cant keep it working right. I'm fine with authenticating for internet play, but making people authenticate for offline play is a plain old stupid idea.

    Check gamefix.com and theres cracks for all portions of Steam anyways, so people ARE pirating half-life 2 & all mods.

    So good job Valve. You've succeeded at pissing off your customers and failed at stopping people who are stealing your games.

    They definately arent getting my money again. Ever. I'll be one of the smart consumers who pirate their games from now on.

  10. The Lesser of Many Evils by TellarHK · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Let's see, in order to publish a video game today you need DRM - shut up. I can hear you bitching already "But what about X, Y, and Z! They don't use DRM!" Shut the fuck up. We're not talking about Joe's Self-Published Title, we're talking about something being sold through a major distributor. DRM is a must - so what options are there?

    Lock to the physical CD? Easily cracked by many different groups out there. Major hassle to the game player, has the most potential for incompatibility issues.

    Serial key lock without serverside verification, or one-time verification? Again, not easily cracked, and will either have the same problem Steam will long down the road (no server to unlock) or will probably be backed up by a physical disc lock.

    License terms on all these options? One machine, occasionally one machine + laptop (though that's rare for games)

    And then there's Steam. Yes, Steam has flaws ranging from major to minor so let's look at those:

    Major flaws:
    Must authenticate to server or declare offline after authentication. Reliability of the server system is questionable. Will it be up tonight, next week, next year, a year after Steam 2 comes out? Twenty years down the road for retro-gaming?

    Minor flaws:
    Still can be cracked with some effort. Requires you to wait a few moments to launch the Steam.exe and load that before the game loads. However, in some cases this actually takes LESS time than some games that force you to watch six screens of technology trademark videos first.

    Now what does Steam give you after all this hassle? The ability to keep your game up to date without worrying about it. The ability to log onto and play your game from any computer with Steam installed. Any computer, just one at a time. This is great for people with multiple computers, or the ability to game after-hours at work or school. You no longer need to worry about the old hassle of installing your game at your college terminal and removing your CD-key before leaving so people don't sniff it out of the registry. ;)

    (Okay, the last probably just describes my school)

    Honestly, until Valve fucks it up seriously, I'm giving them the benefit of the doubt. They put enough time, energy and improvement into the first game that they earned a shot at changing the status quo. Publishers would NEVER let them distribute without some form of DRM, and I'd much rather have Steam and the benefits it does bring than anything like SecuROM and its ilk.

    A DRM-less world would be fucking incredible, yes. But guess what? Even if every person on Slashdot never bought another DRM-enabled program again, DRM will still be here. Idealism is fine, and breaking the rules is just fine too - but when people lash out like I see here it's just annoying. If you don't like it, fine. But acting like spoiled kids and calling the people at Valve all sorts of names is just pathetic.

    I don't see people bitching about the DRM built into the latest MMORPG, but they still shell forty or fifty bucks up front, then twelve bucks a month to keep on playing, but everyone complains about Steam as if they're stealing your soul. Many MMORPG's haven't given you the extra content Valve pulled into Half-Life since 1998. Team Fotress Classic, HL Deathmatch, acquiring DOD and Counter-Strike, that weird Ricochet thing, patch after patch after patch. Yet when HL2 comes out with something new, everyone goes off the deep end like they cloned Hitler.

  11. Re:That's what you get! by TellarHK · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is the biggest legitimate concern about Steam that most people voice - what happens if Valve goes under? I've been hoping someone in the gaming industry with enough pull could simply ASK Valve the question:

    ''If in the unlikely event that you were unable to continue providing authentication services within a reasonable amount of time, would you make certain people could activate the game?'' ... or some variation on that theme. Newell should have an answer for this, if he doesn't, he should be pushed hard enough to need one. I feel as though there's no reason to distrust any response he gives, so if he says they've got a plan, that's enough.

  12. I hate to say it but... by jjn1056 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...you had to know this was going to happen.

    I mean, this company comes up with a digital restrictions management scheme that if Microsoft tried you'd all be screaming bloody murder, but just because it's from a game company, and you really want to play, you are willing to overlook the truly draconian measures they came up with to control distribution of their software.

    The way I see it, you all gave up your freedom to live in a fascist state because the government promised you something you valued more than freedom. Now you have to live with it. Good luck.

    Just remember, if we reward the companies who do this sort of thing by buying their games, they have no reason to stop. Just stop buying the game. It's a freedom thing. If we keep mindlessly buying stuff, sooner or later everything will be like this. I know you want to play, but sometimes standing up for your freedoms is hard.

    --
    Peace, or Not?
  13. Re:It's a GAME by NanoGator · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Um... Sure, I can see it'd be frustrating, but dude it's a *game*."

    Point of game: Entertainment.
    Game not in operation: Not entertainment.
    Cost of Game: $50

    Parent poster: Clueless.

    --
    "Derp de derp."