Slashdot Mirror


AOL Updates: Standalone Browser, Search, VoIP

Eric writes "In the face of increasing pressure from the likes of Google and MSN, America Online has opened beta testing for its standalone AOL Browser and Desktop Search to anyone with an AOL or AIM screen name. The AOL Browser beta utilizes Microsoft's Internet Explorer engine (not Firefox's, like Netscape) and integrates the company's Desktop Search client. Unlike Netscape it looks decent from the screenshots and also includes some nifty features like tear-off tabs and zooming." And prostoalex writes "In what could be the biggest VOIP push into US households, AOL will start offering VOIP services, as reported by Light Reading. 28% of online Americans subscribe to dial-up or broadband version of AOL, AOL has 4 million broadband users, and beta testers in the Light Reading article seemed to be pretty happy with the service."

125 comments

  1. Ob:AOL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Me too!

  2. Blecchhh! by Stanistani · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The unholy combination of IE and AOL made pretty? ...it always puzzled me why they bought Netscape and never made it their browser...

    1. Re:Blecchhh! by temojen · · Score: 1

      Tinfoil hat time: Netscape was being customized and handed out by competing ISPs... Kill or cripple Netscape, and they can't do that any more. (whoops... mozilla's still alive and kicking).

    2. Re:Blecchhh! by KiltedKnight · · Score: 4, Insightful
      It's a simple answer: Primary desktop placement of the "Get AOL Now" icon. That was the whole reason Microsoft pre-placed that stuff within their installations. AOL and Microsoft had the agreement that AOL uses IE as the basis for its browser, and MS would put the AOL icon right on the desktop.

      Of course, why AOL hasn't converted now is beyond me. MS has long since terminated that icon placement in favor of its own MSN one.

      --
      OCO is Loco
    3. Re:Blecchhh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AOL bought Netscape as a proxy for Microsoft in order to kill it. Fortunately, before the purchase went through, the Netscape developers made the code Open Source as a big FU to Redmond's little ploy.

    4. Re:Blecchhh! by Eberlin · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It was primarily used as a pawn to negotiate with MS. You know, that whole monopoly thing, a neat little settlement, and probably a nice bargaining chip to keep those "Subscribe to AOL" icons on default windows desktop installations.

      When all that was done, they chopped off the Mozilla people and spun them off with their own mozilla foundation with a mil or two (?) to get started.

      Then they bastardized the Netscape brand to sell cheaper Internet access under the guise of a different name, hoping to capitalize on name recognition.

      It would've been great, though -- a giant chunk of "Netizens" (granted, most AOLers deserve their label) switching to Firefox all at once because AOL defaults to it would have been nice.

      Oh well.

    5. Re:Blecchhh! by Stanistani · · Score: 2, Funny

      a giant chunk of "Netizens" ... switching to Firefox all at once...

      And Bill Gates would halt in his tracks, breathing sibilantly, and say, "I sense a great disturbance in the force..."

    6. Re:Blecchhh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nah, the people of Alderaan were peaceful. AOLers, on the average, are incredibly hostile...and have the intelligence of a dandelion.

      The only way I'd miss 'em is if I get too overzealous with an assault rife.

      (This post NOT brought to you by ESR. Had this been an actual post by ESR, it would be more dogmatic, condescending, and would feature more guns.)

    7. Re:Blecchhh! by lwells-au · · Score: 1

      I think you mean he would say "I find your lack of faith disturbing" ;-)

      (I thought Bill Gates was evil this month?)

    8. Re:Blecchhh! by zurab · · Score: 1
      Of course, why AOL hasn't converted now is beyond me.

      Because now the new deal is:

      AOL
      - lets Mozilla go;
      - is free to make deals with OEMs for the desktop icon/preinstalled software;
      - will use IE as their browser for the next 5 (?) years;

      and Microsoft
      - will not bother OEMs or force them to remove AOL offers as a condition for getting a better price for Windows.

      AOL is just letting Microsoft making AOL more and more irrelevant each passing day. They know it - they'd rather have it that way than be proactive, fight "competition," and take more risks.
    9. Re:Blecchhh! by Neoncow · · Score: 1
      To AC,

      Who is ESR??

    10. Re:Blecchhh! by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      You must be new here. :)

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    11. Re:Blecchhh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Eric S. Raymond -- author of "Cathedral and the Bazaar," keeper of the jargon file, Open Source advocate, prominent figure that commands respect but sometimes gets none. :)

  3. You've got PR0N... by ectotherm · · Score: 0

    Too bad AOL did away with newsgroups, unlike Google...

    --
    "Nature bats last..."
  4. the AOL service.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    is just the same as the time-warner VoIP product that's been on the market for several months, under a different brand. Nothing new, really.

    And Vonage works with Time-Warner as well. So there aren't as many VoIP vendors as you assume there are.

    1. Re:the AOL service.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wrongo, it is a different service from cable - worth kicking the tires - some interesting call handling and mobile integration

    2. Re:the AOL service.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sand is really Silicon, so there are not as many elements as you may think...

      Umm. Do you honestly thing that Vonage and Time Warner, and now AOL are the only VOIP options?

      I'm not even mentioning AT&T who dove in recently, no I'm talking about companies/services like packet8, iconnecthere, lingo, stanaphone, etc.

    3. Re:the AOL service.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      is just the same as the time-warner VoIP product that's been on the market for several months, under a different brand

      Not true. As near as I can figure, the TW VoIP service is actually provided by Sprint; the AOL service-to-be is run by Level 3.

  5. Beta testing for AOL by Kipsaysso · · Score: 1, Interesting

    An unstable release of what will be an unstable browser.

    --
    This is another way of starting a sig with this and ending it with that.
    1. Re:Beta testing for AOL by gcaseye6677 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not to mention, AOL will no doubt use these new "features" as an excuse for yet another price increase. They'll sit in board meetings wondering why they keep losing subscribers and why people aren't willing to pay more for AOL dialup than DSL would cost. Seriously, does anyone still believe that they can do things on AOL that they can't do on the real internet?

  6. Based on Internet Explorer by JWW · · Score: 5, Funny

    Every time I see how AOL's browser is based on Internet Explorer, I can't help but imagine the meeting in a few years where AOL will have to license the technonogy again.

    The meeting ends with a line from Microsoft sounding somthing like "One Trilllion Dollars," then maniaical super villan laugh.

    1. Re:Based on Internet Explorer by Greenisus · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I don't think that's the case. It sounds to me like AOL can just dangle Netscape in front of Microsoft's eyes to get them to play nice.

    2. Re:Based on Internet Explorer by psydragn · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The last time Netscape was dangled in front of Microsoft, they poured buckets of money into IE and subsequently crushed Netscape. I'd guess Bill would try the same again rather than bothering to play nice. Also, comparing the two companies' chequebooks, microsoft has a lot more buckets of money to throw at things.

    3. Re:Based on Internet Explorer by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      AOL's market share is dwindling. If it continues to do so, the value of dangling Netscape before mickeysoft will also decrease. There's a ways to go before that happens to any measurable degree but it is coming.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    4. Re:Based on Internet Explorer by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 1

      The last time Netscape was dangled in front of Microsoft, they poured buckets of money into IE and subsequently crushed Netscape.

      Yes, but the last time Netscape was at version 4.7x. Netscape was old, buggy, slow, didn't render modern HTML correctly and was missing major features. It had been a couple years since the last major update.

      Now, the Mozilla and Firefox projects are running full steam ahead, and they are serious potential competitors to IE. AOL could spend some money and create a new browser based off of the OSS projects.

      Although that's just the technical side of things. If I remember right, AOL and Microsoft signed an agreement stating that AOL would use IE as their standard browser for a number of years. Moz isn't on the radar.

    5. Re:Based on Internet Explorer by Shaheen · · Score: 1

      Stop spreading FUD. You are free to instantiate your own instance of IE's rendering engine (Trident) as a hosted COM control.

      AOL doesn't have to pay any fees.

      --
      You should never take life too seriously - You'll never get out of it alive.
    6. Re:Based on Internet Explorer by hunterx11 · · Score: 1

      Frankly I'd like that to happen. I used to use IE instead of Netscape because it was better at the time. There's no reason Microsoft can't make IE the best browser again--heaven knows they have the money and hackers.

      --
      English is easier said than done.
    7. Re:Based on Internet Explorer by novakyu · · Score: 1
      ...heaven knows they have the money and hackers.

      And backward-compatibility to keep. Main problem with IE isn't really feature---tab-browsing? well, I admit it is my favorite feature in Mozilla/Firefox, but it's not such a difficult feature to code (IANACoder, but why would it be?), and I don't think Mozilla Foundation forgot to patent that feature ;)---the real problem is with security: ActiveX.

      Frankly, I don't know the details of how it works (other than a few major security issues (er, deletion/access to arbitrary file?) that came up recently), but from what I've been hearing, the way ActiveX was designed, it was designed to be powerful---like a root account, and thus open to much vulnerability. If IE is to compete with Firefox in security, ActiveX has to be secured airtight (now that would be difficult to code) or be discarded---but seeing how long it took M$ to dump DOS (remember that all Windows 'til 2000 (and NT, but it wasn't too popular in home PC) was basically a graphical front-end to DOS), I don't see them doing it until it's too late.

  7. Compatibility? by Justin205 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Will their VOIP work with anything else?

    Because if it's AOL-only, it's not going to catch on with most of the world (or even 72% of the USA)...

    --
    "Your effort to remain what you are is what limits you."
  8. Why are AOL making two different browsers? by Jugalator · · Score: 1

    Anyone know if they've commented on this?

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  9. I love Google by Jesus+IS+the+Devil · · Score: 4, Funny

    Notice how there's an ad for Vonage right underneath the article? Priceless.

    --

    eTrade SUCKS
    1. Re:I love Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Notice how there's an ad for Vonage right underneath the article? Priceless.

      No, you're thinking of Mastercard.

    2. Re:I love Google by rainman_bc · · Score: 1

      Notice how there's an ad for Vonage right underneath the article? Priceless.

      I use firefox with the adblock extension enabled - I don't see the ad :)

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    3. Re:I love Google by Deviant+Q · · Score: 2, Funny

      There is? Oh wait...

      You must be using the AOL Browser ;).

      WHERE'S YOUR FIREFOX/ADBLOCK, BOY??

      --
      "May the days be aimless. Let the seasons drift. Do not advance the action according to a plan."
    4. Re:I love Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how can you beg for wedding money when you wont even let ads be displayed on a site you get great value from that depends upon ad revenue???

    5. Re:I love Google by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because they're a tightwad bastard?

  10. YESSSS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    God yes, AOL + /. + geeks!

    Another reason to use bold.

  11. Any news on... by GillBates0 · · Score: 5, Funny
    when they'll be done testing and start mailing out the new CDs?

    I'm building a roof for my cubicle.

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
    1. Re:Any news on... by DeathByDuke · · Score: 0

      AOL, please send your discs to me, in nice full DVD cases like some of your last ones. I take such good care of them! My DVD-Rs and CD-Rs love you for your free caring homes for them!

    2. Re:Any news on... by Phleg · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not being done hasn't stopped them from shipping CDs before.

      --
      No comment.
  12. More Info Regarding Its Features by Alien+Venom · · Score: 5, Informative

    From: http://beta.aol.com/aolbrowser/index.html?

    Desktop Search: Now you can find files, photos, songs, pictures and other files on your computer's hard drive just as easily as you search the Web. And you don't even have to leave your Web browser to do it.

    Tabbed Browsing: Keep tabs on your Internet experience! The new AOL Browser uses convenient tabs to help organize all your open browser windows, so you can quickly switch back and forth among multiple Web sites, easily finding--and getting to--the one you want.

    Clear My Footprints: Whether you like it or not, your computer keeps track of everywhere you go online. But the new AOL Browser helps protect your privacy and stop snoops with just one click. Quickly and easily clear your Internet history, cookies, caches and more. You can even choose exactly which footprints you want to clear--making sure you erase what you want, when you want.

    Thumbnail Previews: Now you can save time by viewing actual mini-previews of Web pages, instead of trying to decipher misleading URLs. Simply hold the mouse over any item in your history or favorites, or over any open browser tabs, and you'll be able to see where you're going--before you even get there.

    1. Re:More Info Regarding Its Features by E+IS+mC(Square) · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >>Simply hold the mouse over any item in your history or favorites, or over any open browser tabs, and you'll be able to see where you're going--before you even get there.

      So, now we well have infected PCs. Reason - just holding mouse over something.

      Sounds like fun.

    2. Re:More Info Regarding Its Features by EvilAlien · · Score: 5, Funny

      Do all those features sound like they are designed to make management and enjoyment of porn easier?

      --
      perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10)'
    3. Re:More Info Regarding Its Features by Jiggily · · Score: 2, Funny

      Do all those features sound like they are designed to make management and enjoyment of porn easier?


      What else do you use the internet for?????
      --
      Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, for the are subtle and quick to anger.
    4. Re:More Info Regarding Its Features by MrFlannel · · Score: 1

      Only history, favorites, and open tabs. Favorites would be the only one you haven't nessisarily been to yet, might not even do it until you go there. I'm not going to install it just to find out though, it'll take me too long to get rid of all the remnants.

      --
      Clones are people two.
    5. Re:More Info Regarding Its Features by kitzilla · · Score: 1
      > Desktop Search

      Like Google, x-friend, etc.

      > Tabbed Browsing

      Like ... well, everyone except IE.

      > Clear My Footprints

      Like Safari 2.0

      > Thumbnail Previews

      Like Omniweb.

      Not much new here: a prettier skin for Microsoft's butt-ugly IE. Windows only. Yawn.

      Note to Firefox developers: Omniweb's thumbnail tabs might be worth emulating as an extension.

      --
      This is my post. There are many others like it. If you don't like what you read here, go try one of the others.
    6. Re:More Info Regarding Its Features by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TEE HEE!!

  13. Image by Leroy_Brown242 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I fear that the average user will think that the way AOL impliments VoIP and Desktop serching, is as good as it gets.

    I fear AOL won't do a great job (suprise!) and people will think "VoIP sucks! I tried it with AOL and it never worked right!"

    Then, they might shy away from other VoIP services that are great.

    1. Re:Image by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And why exactly do you fear that ?

  14. Internet Explorer... because we don't own it ... ? by popo · · Score: 4, Interesting


    Someone please remind me why AOL bought Netscape again?

    Does it strike anyone else as odd that AOL does almost everything they possibly can to *not* add market value to one of their best known brands?

    You'd think with the amount of cash AOL has on hand, and with the entire marketplace suddenly beginning to question whether or not IE is worth the trouble... they'd slap some of the dust of Netscape and breathe some life into it. No?

    --
    ------ The best brain training is now totally free : )
  15. VoIP by turtled · · Score: 2, Funny

    In the middle of your call... "Goodbye"

    --
    "I cannot think of any need in childhood as strong as the need for a father's protection." -- Sigmund Freud
  16. I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    What percentage of AOL users were Bush voters?

  17. Spyware, virus, oh my. by WindBourne · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It is bad enough that somebody is watching your every keystroke. Now, AOL will allow anybody to listen on your conversation as well by integrating this with MSIE.

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  18. AOL too? by kiwidefunkt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    AOL is coming out with a standalone browser?

    This doesn't have anything to do with Google register gbrowser.com, does it?

    What's next, a Microsoft browser? Jeez.

    --
    www.kiwilyrics.com - a wiki for lyrics
    1. Re:AOL too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's next, a Microsoft browser? Jeez.

      I take it you never heard of Internet Explorer?

    2. Re:AOL too? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's next, a Microsoft browser? Jeez.
      I'm waiting for the Microsoft OS myself.

  19. Standalone? by Living+WTF · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How could it be standalone when it uses the (already installed, I guess) Internet Explorer rendering engine?

    --
    I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it.
    1. Re:Standalone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > How could it be standalone when it uses the (already installed, I guess) Internet Explorer rendering engine?

      Standalone in the sense that it isn't bundled into the overall AOL client the way the current AOL browser is.

    2. Re:Standalone? by Stevyn · · Score: 1

      You're seeing from the viewpoint of someone with "half a brain or more". To their "less than half a brain" customer base, this is a standalone browser. They think that this will remove them from all that "bad internet explorer XP stuff that makes my computer go boo boo".

      If they really wanted to leverage something against microsoft, they should try and make some AOLinux beta and pass it around. I'm not saying actually release it, God knows they haven't got the balls for that, but it would scare Microsoft.

  20. Interesting by mixtape5 · · Score: 1

    I think that AOL will have to do something that hasn't been done before in order to gain back the web dominance they once had.

    Making a browser with zoom and tab features has been done before. VOIP is also available elswhere, while this might satisfy their current customers, I dont see them drawing in a significant amount of new users with it.

    --
    WoW: Scheod 70 orc warlock on Shadowmoon
  21. wow by ak3ldama · · Score: 1

    did any one notice how the screenshot's example page had articles up that were highly favorable to internet explorer and microsoft? some sort of subliminal attempts at converting over fools i suppose.

    --
    "but money is the God of Algiers & Mahomet their prophet." - Rich. O'Bryen June 8th 1786
  22. Attack of the CDS by Mr.+Falco · · Score: 1

    Not again I am tired of getting all those crappie cds from AOL. They are just costars! As for IE and AOL together just one question. What the heck? It's a nice idea to have a stand alone browser but AOL come on. They are venturing to the dark side.

    1. Re:Attack of the CDS by AceCaseOR · · Score: 1

      I didn't mind so much. I got a either a cheap CD case out of the bargain, or a metal case that can hold 2 CDs. Either way, I win!

      --
      Zagreus sits inside your head, Zagreus lives among the dead, Zagreus sees you in your bed and eats you in your sleep.
    2. Re:Attack of the CDS by rob_squared · · Score: 1

      I have a theory. AOL has only made 1 AOL cd. But they cursed it, so that if you don't want to die in 7 days, you must make a copy of the CD and send it to someone else. But like most things, the curse failed and not one AOL user has died.

      --
      I don't get it.
    3. Re:Attack of the CDS by FusionDragon2099 · · Score: 0

      Just coasters? You don't have much resourcefulness. I use them for skeet shooting, myself...

  23. Pretty Happy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Reaction to the service from beta testers is mixed, based on user posts to Broadband Reports and other message boards."

    How does that equate to happy?

  24. VoIP and dial-up? by SaDan · · Score: 4, Funny

    I wonder how many people AOL will get to subscribe to VoIP services using their 56K dial-up connection?

    1. Re:VoIP and dial-up? by Leroy_Brown242 · · Score: 1

      YIKES!

      That'd be a losing situation.

      Either the sound quality would be REALLY poor, or it'd drop like mad.

      BAH! This is what I'm talking about!

    2. Re:VoIP and dial-up? by canon006 · · Score: 1

      What would be really scary to see is how many people sign up for dial-up on their VOIP system...

  25. yeesh - ugly fonts by UTRules · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    So, I'm not using Windows too much these days, but looking at that screenshot I couldn't help noticing the ugly-ass fonts on the menus. Is that still par for the course on Windows XP these days? Are Windows users going to have to wait for Avalon before they can get decent fonts on their desktop? I mean, even my ancient Red Hat 9 desktop looks better than that.

  26. Firefox and Netscape! what! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Netscape is not based off firefox sorry.... Mozilla and Netscape are more closely related, Mozilla came from Netscape and Netscape has since then adopted some of Mozilla's stuff. Firefox is a fresh completely re-done browser... Just to clear that up

  27. free coasters by mottie · · Score: 3, Funny

    I haven't gotten any of those funky multicolored coasters in the mail for a while, I hope this means that AOL will start sending them out again!

    1. Re:free coasters by Mr.+Falco · · Score: 1

      Or how about a Frisbee. Or of course I use them for wall art.

  28. Re:Internet Explorer... because we don't own it .. by Averron · · Score: 1

    They're using the Netscape brand to push an ISP that competes directly with NetZero.

  29. shamless plug... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    as a beta-tester for aol-voip: something aol has done well, there voip service ain't bad, ideally it should stand well to mass usage

    1. Re:shamless plug... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's been working fine for me as well with the Motorola terminal adapter. However, this week I got a Netgear router with integral 802.11g and VoIP TA -- I think that this is what's going to actually be deployed to customers -- and it wasn't configured at all before being sent to me, i.e. it never contacts Level 3 and gets its VoIP on.

      The text in the configuration interface also makes specific reference to 'Vonage': oops! Hopefully that'll be changed before actual paying customers get 'em, and hopefully they'll start paying more attention to getting them properly configured.

  30. They know their customers. by Living+WTF · · Score: 0

    Perhaps they just chose IE to prevent their Army Of Lamers overflooding the Netscape Support forums.

    --
    I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it.
  31. Who paid? by Elektroschock · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As far as I know AOL owned Netscape and funded Mozilla development. Then MS paid them large amounts of money that they continue to support their IE Engine. It was a multimillion deal. A real payoff for open source investment that secures independence. As some economists told us monopolies are not that bad as long as there is the option of antoher player to enter the market and take it over. It is really funny to see MS paying for IE usage.

    1. Re:Who paid? by westlake · · Score: 1
      It is really funny to see MS paying for IE usage

      Even in decline, AOL has 26 million subscribers, almost all of which are running Windows, and will likely remain with Windows and IE, even if they migrate.

  32. Looks decent? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It looks like another app that introduces its own inconsistant look with the rest of the sytem, just like media player does, winamp, or any other app which has a skin fetish. How this can be described as decent is beyond me.

  33. Pretty good... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...but hot grits would have been better than mud, IMHO.

  34. Re:Internet Explorer... because we don't own it .. by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Someone please remind me why AOL bought Netscape again?

    For leverage against Microsoft.

    They don't want to fight the IE-only sites with either development resources or educational resources.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  35. does the browser have automatic virus updates? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    can i bookmark my favorite virii?

  36. Why tearoffs? by gmhowell · · Score: 1

    Why do you use tearoffs without an MDI? (yes, I'm too lazy to look at the screenshots to see if it uses an MDI.)

    --
    Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  37. Re:Internet Explorer... because we don't own it .. by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Someone please remind me why AOL bought Netscape again?

    They bought it for the Netscape brand and the netscape.com portal to aquire more customers for their advertising business. The Netscape Browser wasn't on the top of their wishlist at all. Maybe Netscape allowed AOL to hedge their bets in the grand MSN vs AOL battle, and they probably used the browser while negotiating with Microsoft. But really, in 1998, Netscape 4.x was really starting to suck in comparison to IE.

    Here was Steve Case's case for the purchase. Notice how he doesn't mention 'browser':

    "Netscape's brand, portal, and people will help turn the promise of electronic commerce into reality," said AOL chief executive Steve Case in a conference call.

  38. For thoes who didnt RTFA by cybersavior · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I found it interesting that on the screenshot, 3 or the 4 artilces shown were pro-MS.

    The first, "Gates Promises Interoperable Software" which shows how MS will start writing software that work on other OSes.

    The second, talks about how MS is starting a new offensive on piracy, pushing its Genuine Advantage program. If you have a valid MS License, you can get rebates and other perks.

    The third, "Spoofing flaw found in non-IE browsers" Pretty much speaks for itself.

    Interesting, no? We've always known or suspected AOL and MS were bed-partners but its not likely that they did that without first consulting MS. Could the new battleground be MS/AOL vs Linux/Netscape (assuming Netscape doesnt fux0r everything again).

  39. They're also icing non-AIM clients... by Evro · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I've had 3 screennames banned from AIM in the past 2 weeks due to using a non-AOL client (I've been using naim, a command-line aim client). One of the banned screennames had been mine since 1997. The page they direct you to - www.aim.com/suspended_accout - results in a 404 for me.


    Received: by 10.54.59.6 with SMTP id h6mr97856wra;
    Mon, 07 Feb 2005 13:03:03 -0800 (PST)
    Return-Path: <newman@newman.newman-grt.oscar.aol.com>
    From: AOL Instant Messenger <newman@newman.newman-grt.oscar.aol.com>
    To:
    Sub ject: AIM Account suspended!
    Mime-Version: 1.0
    Date: Mon, 07 Feb 2005 13:03:03 -0800 (PST)

    AIM User

    We have detected that the AIM Screen Name sixtyfourcubits associated with
    this email address has been used in a way that violates the terms and
    conditions of the AOL Instant Messenger service. Because of these
    violations, AOL has suspended the use of this screen name. If you
    believe that this suspension has occurred in error, please fill out the
    form located at www.aim.com/suspended_accout. By providing accurate
    information, you will enable us to properly investigate the situation.

    Sincerely,
    The AOL Instant Messenger Team*

    * Please note this e-mail is not a commercial e-mail and is intended
    only to provide official notice about an AOL Instant Messenger account
    identified with this e-mail address.
    --
    rooooar
    1. Re:They're also icing non-AIM clients... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's really scary, although I might point out that you don't know for sure that that's why they closed your account.

      My primary screen name was apparently banned once; I'd used it for many years and was quite fond of it. I didn't get an e-mail, but rather a message on login. Of the possible causes listed, it stated that using a screen name that was formerly part of an AOL account after said account was closed (which described my screen name) was a violation of the TOS.

      Thankfully, the account was working again after a few days... might have been a fluke, I dunno. It makes me sick that I'm so attached to something under the control of a horrible entity like AOL, but I really feel that the name is part of my identity. If I lost it for good I'd be very upset.

      Then again, if I had to go back to their barf-worthy official client in order to keep my screen name... I'm just not sure I could do it.

      Fuck AOL and their bumbling attempts to further their bottomline while pissing off users. One day the world will realise they're useless and they'll be out of business; I can only hope their IM service will live on at someone else's hands. Either that or all the people I know will be using something else so I won't have to worry about it anymore.

      AC because I'm paranoid.

    2. Re:They're also icing non-AIM clients... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Maybe this is what you're looking for... Don't see any appeal form, though.

      Q: Suspended Account
      A: Your Screen Name has been suspended. There are several reasons why you may have received this message:
      1. Screen Names that were previously used on AOL but have been cancelled, can no longer be used on AIM. This includes both master accounts and sub-accounts.
      2. Users who identify themselves as children under the age of 13 may not use this service at this time. If you are an adult and have entered your birth date incorrectly, you may use a credit card to complete our age verification process now, or anytime within 30 days of the date when you identified yourself as a child. You will not be charged for this credit card verification. Click here to sign in to our age verification form to reactivate your Screen Name.
      3. An account may be terminated for violations for the terms of service.
    3. Re:They're also icing non-AIM clients... by Derek+Pomery · · Score: 3, Informative

      I've had the same problem.
      Although I'm being generous and ascribing it to:
      12/10/2004 If you recently began receiving an error message indicating that your sign on has been blocked because your account has been suspended, please be patient as we restore the accounts over the next several days. We apologize for the inconvenience.

      In the bug list.
      I hope this is the case, since my login is just as old.

      --
      -- perl -e'print pack"H*","6e656d6f406d38792e6f7267"' /. ate my old sig. Bastards.
    4. Re:They're also icing non-AIM clients... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Guess what, they finally fixed their URL. so GO COMPLAIN!

      http://www.aim.com/suspended_account/report.adp

  40. Screw the coasters by oddfox · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I want AOL to start distributing their software/etc. in those AOL tins that they used to use, least 'round here. Very handy for keeping certain things in. :)

    Here's the tin if you don't know what it looks like. But I don't use it for a survival kit, or at least that's not what I would call it's primary function. Come to think of it, nuking some of those AOL CDs could prove fun on those rainy days.

    --
    "We invented personal computing." - Bill Gates
    1. Re:Screw the coasters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that's nothing. I used to work for AOL- they gave us some cheap-ass watches ( something about 10 million users or something ). They came in a nice, round, stainless steel tin ( no color ). Pretty handy. You know, you could keep your weed in there.

  41. Licensing or Fighting Adobe Patent? by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 3, Informative

    We've lacked tear-off tabs in all kinds of applications for a decade because USPTO gave Adobe a patent on it and they've gone after companies who infringe on it.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    1. Re:Licensing or Fighting Adobe Patent? by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      Funny reading those comments.. Five years later and the only thing that's changed is the user numbers.

  42. Re:Uh... by hoovernj · · Score: 1

    Ever heard of MSN?

  43. Netscape? Not Firefox by ssssmemyself · · Score: 1

    Uhh, Netscape is not based on Firefox. Back many ages ago, Netscape donated a bunch of code that became the Mozilla project, spawning many many projects, most notably Seamonkey, (original mozilla suite) Firefox, and Thunderbird. I think that Netscape may have started using a heavily branded version of Seamonkey a while ago, but I'm pretty sure that it wasn't Firefox. As we all know, Firefox has only gone 1.0 only a few months ago.

    1. Re:Netscape? Not Firefox by mav160 · · Score: 0

      ummmmm the next version of netscape will be based on firefox (that is if it's ever released) with some sort of active x worked into it Here's Beta News on the story again

  44. Bah! by bhsx · · Score: 2, Funny

    September in VOIPland. And no, it'll never end. (Sorry;)

    --
    put the what in the where?
  45. So, security will never happen, again. by acidblue · · Score: 1

    So, I don't know if it's just me, but this lock-in with IE just gets on my nerves. For years I have been getting phone calls from the parents asking for help because they got another freakin' virus, trojan, spyware etc. on their machine because of this freakin' browser. So, I got them to start using Mozilla, for what I thought was exclusively. Now, they use AOL all the time with that damned browser in it. Yes, they have XP SP2, an external firewall. But we all know that it means nothing when you invite the stuff into your home. So, they won't buy a Mac. They won't even consider linux. How the heck can I protect these people? Well, I guess AOL will be doing a great job at promoting their anti-virus/anti-adware/anti-trojan ect. tools because they, again, promote the freakin' tool that is the root cause of these problems. Pretty funny when you think about it. I think Semantec/McAfee/whomever should distribute their own "version" of IE so they can help keep themselves in the loop too. I just wish there was a way to stop someone from distributing such blatently dangerous code to the world (our parents and children). Again, just annoyed. Someone mentioned earlier "Why did AOL buy Netscape"? I haven't a clue. Probably because M$ wanted them to. But, that is just a conspiracy theory.

  46. Uhhh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...so do you think AOL will be pushing VOIP to their 56k (or less) dialup users? What a nightmare!

    /just kidding

  47. VOIP by mschoolbus · · Score: 1

    I Think AOL and M$ could make a very funny, yet very sad program... The active spread of virus via the phone.

    Just using a Windows box is bad enough as to how easily they get infected with spyware and the like.

  48. Crap by XxXoldsaltXxX · · Score: 0

    Looks like just another all-hype app that will be just suck (its AOL, the king of giving you shit that you do not want)

  49. I've downloaded it already... by xtremee · · Score: 1

    Well, what can i say? it uses the IE engine (the one embedded on windows, of course, so it's not "standalone" as they claim it to be) so from a security point of view is useless, so i'm sorry tech support guys, you'll continue to get calls from people with spyware and viruses problems. On the other hand, this thing is really easy to use and it looks great on every aspect. I don't know if you have noticed that there's a plus sign on the top left-hand corner, which can be used to open a new tab.
    If you are looking for eye candy and ease of use, download it, it won't let you down. But beware, remember that it uses the IE engine so be careful when you browse.
    Now, the bad thing about it is that there is no option to disable the installation of the desktop search feature, i already have google desktop and i didn't want it to get installed on my system.
    From a developer's point of view, it's nothing more than a visual basic application with nifty graphics branded by AOL, but i have to admit that i love the theme. Too bad they didn't use gecko, i don't know why they bought netscape after all.

  50. Uh yeah.... by ShatteredDream · · Score: 1

    I have never met anyone below the age of 30 that knows anything about computers at all that just assumes that AOL is as good as it gets. In fact, I don't even know anyone in the under 25 age group that would even find any appeal to an AOL browser. Firefox is already exploding in marketshare among the under 25 population if my college is any indication. Besides, AIM is already free and so you don't need to buy AOL's service to do all of the things that AOL is "good for."

    AOL really is only good for people who can't be bothered to learn anything about the Internet and soccer moms who want "parental controls."

  51. File A Complaint to the FTC/FCC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AOL was required to open up its instant messaging as a condition of the merger, which they obviously have not done. For the benefit of everyone else, please try to file a complaint so we can stop this.

  52. Server? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was trying to see where it was downloading from, netstat -n, when it showed this ip http://12.158.80.10/ What are all those files? Is this an AOL server?

  53. Nothing New: by Tavor · · Score: 0

    "Desktop Search: Now you can find files, photos, songs, pictures and other files on your computer's hard drive just as easily as you search the Web. And you don't even have to leave your Web browser to do it." Ever tried Start/Find/Files or Folders? Been here since Win95. "Tabbed Browsing: Keep tabs on your Internet experience! The new AOL Browser uses convenient tabs to help organize all your open browser windows, so you can quickly switch back and forth among multiple Web sites, easily finding--and getting to--the one you want." Mozilla, Firefox, Avant Browser (IE), among numerous others offer this. "Clear My Footprints: Whether you like it or not, your computer keeps track of everywhere you go online. But the new AOL Browser helps protect your privacy and stop snoops with just one click. Quickly and easily clear your Internet history, cookies, caches and more. You can even choose exactly which footprints you want to clear--making sure you erase what you want, when you want." Try SnapFiles.com (formerly WebAttack), they have tons of privacy tools, in both Freeware and Shareware. "Thumbnail Previews: Now you can save time by viewing actual mini-previews of Web pages, instead of trying to decipher misleading URLs. Simply hold the mouse over any item in your history or favorites, or over any open browser tabs, and you'll be able to see where you're going--before you even get there." Haha. Just like browsing your favorites folder in Windows 98. Ever notice that little preview panel will also show webpages? Conclusion: AOL is once again offering regurgitated crap, hyped up with marketing to blind 'Joe L User' from seeing that it's *nothing new*!

    --
    Windows has detected an undetectable error.
  54. Not Half Bad... by dilema · · Score: 0

    It has some pretty nifty features...and some rather strange ones as well. Tabbed browsing(although you have to right click a link and select in the menu "Open in new tab") Thumbnails previews for each tab. Just hover your mouse over a tab and you'll get a a mini shot of it. And surprisingly i dodn't notice a spike in resources when i did this. The Sidebar isn't half bad and it's removable. I could see how this is useful. As far as the desktop search is concerned it doesn't give you an oppertunity to NOT install this. But unlike most people i have actually went through the settings in the browser and found you can disable this feature all together. One thing i noticed is that it has Adding/Removing of files from the index in rela time. Unlike Google/Msn(yahoo? i dun think yahoo does this either). So thats a plus, but i'lls tick with MSN Desktop Search(it just works well! no flamage please) Anyhow it's not half bad. Although the mere fact that it uses IE engine measn instant removal as soon as i am done playing.

  55. And meanwhile AOL refuses email by vacuum_tuber · · Score: 2, Interesting

    And "In the face of increasing pressure from the likes of Google and MSN, America Online" has, just in the last couple of days, begun refusing email from mail servers that don't have matching reverse DNS entries, thus cutting off its subscribers from the growing number of small and medium businesses using fixed IP cable or DSL Internet service. It's nice to have matching reverse DNS and it's fastidious in an Internet purist sense, but it's in no way necessary. I host thirteen domains on fixed IP cable Internet and am instituting an SMTP block that will bounce email from the aol.com domain with a message advising senders that due to new AOL policies we cannot reply or send them email, so we recommend they drop AOL and get a real ISP. AOL is its own punishment and it's fitting that they are constricting the world in which their clueless subscribers can operate. AOL deserves to go bust and have its assets sold on eBay.

    --
    Look at the bright side: there's always seppuku.
    1. Re:And meanwhile AOL refuses email by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      America Online has, just in the last couple of days, begun refusing email from mail servers that don't have matching reverse DNS entries,

      Finaly! Great!

      thus cutting off its subscribers from the growing number of small and medium businesses using fixed IP cable or DSL Internet service.[...] we recommend they drop AOL and get a real ISP

      I recommend these businesses drop their current ISP and get a real ISP that knows its network operations. Or they could just use the ISP's smarthost.

    2. Re:And meanwhile AOL refuses email by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're not blocking my mail, and I've got no reverse DNS entry at all on my mail server.

      Maybe they're only blocking if your server *has* a reverse entry, but it doesn't match?

  56. AOL by elronxenu · · Score: 1

    Where can I get one of tohse?

  57. A dream come true! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Awesome! When I woke up this morning I thought to myself - you know, I'd really like ANOTHER fucking browser.

  58. death before dishonor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i'd rather kill myself than use an aol browser

  59. nifty zooming ? by richlv · · Score: 1

    "includes some nifty features like tear-off tabs and zooming."

    it's like. er. something very cool/new ?
    opera has this for ages - isn't this a standard feature in browsers ?

    --
    Rich
  60. First one to have an ergonomic back button? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the first browser I have seen that makes the back button bigger, as suggested by usability experts, because it is the most user button.

  61. Screenshot choice by thegnu · · Score: 0

    Did anyone else notice the choice of screenshot? The prominent news items in the view:

    Gates Promises Interoperable Software
    Spoofing Flaw Found in Non-IE Browsers
    MSN Counters iTunes With Free Songs
    And a featured story about Microsoft Genuine Advantage Program

    I know the market is Microsoft-heavy, but wow.

    --
    Please stop stalking me, bro.
  62. "...anyone with an AOL or AIM screen name "? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have an AOL screen name, but :

    OS Support: Windows 2000/2003/9x/XP
    Requirements: Internet Explorer 6.0+

    Oh yeah. I forgot. I'm noone.