Slashdot Mirror


Linspire Five-0 First Look

Eugenia writes "OSNews posted an exclusive first look for the upcoming Linspire 5.0: 'Linspire Five-0 is definitely a good base from which to build. The lack of well rounded applications when compared to other OSes in its class leave me wanting more, however, a slick look, some powerful Linspire specific apps, and a non-crippled undercarriage remain appealing' says the author." The bigger question will be how it stacks up against other commericial offerings in the long run. (ITMJ is also owned by OSTG).

106 of 163 comments (clear)

  1. Just had to say it.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Linspire Five-0?

    Boot 'em, Danno.

  2. Should've named this OS somethiing better. by bigtallmofo · · Score: 4, Funny

    I don't know, but the name Linspire just doesn't sound good to me. They should've called this operating system somethinig much more descriptive of what it does... The only thing that jumps out to me is Lindows. I wonder why they didn't think of that name?

    --
    I'm a big tall mofo.
    1. Re:Should've named this OS somethiing better. by who+got+my+name · · Score: 1, Funny

      You might be right, how about: Wannabemswin.

      --
      The only person who is capable of killing my karma, is me, do not even try to help me.
    2. Re:Should've named this OS somethiing better. by Dwonis · · Score: 1

      +1, Informative? Heh.

    3. Re:Should've named this OS somethiing better. by Hobadee · · Score: 1

      I donno if your being serious or not, so I'll post this anyways.

      Linspire did used to be called "Lindows", however, they got sued by another big software manufacturing company, who shall remain nameless. Although they could have, and should have, won the suit, ("windows is a generic term, ala: X-Windows etc...) they decided to save time and money and just re-name thier product.

      --
      ...Had this been an actual emergency, we would have fled in terror, and you would not have been informed.
  3. Root still the default login? by Jack+Taylor · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The question is, do they still reccomend users to log in as root for everday use? The thing that put me off Linspire the most was that they have the full power of the Unix security model but they don't bother using it.

    --
    One good turn - gets all the covers.
    1. Re:Root still the default login? by Jack+Taylor · · Score: 1

      (Oops - I wish Slashdot came with a spell-checker ;)

      --
      One good turn - gets all the covers.
    2. Re:Root still the default login? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      You are given the option to set up a new user when installing and on first boot and are even explained why you should do so. It has been this way since vesion 4.5. Can we please stop the "run as root" myth about Linspire.

    3. Re:Root still the default login? by Jack+Taylor · · Score: 1

      That's good - I didn't know it explained why. But being root is still default, is it not?

      --
      One good turn - gets all the covers.
    4. Re:Root still the default login? by joeljkp · · Score: 1

      It appears so. On 4.5, you're given a screen on first boot explaining a little about security. There are three buttons: OK, Set Time, Advanced. To set up a non-root user, you must click Advanced, then Manage Users to open up KDE's users config screen, and then go through those menus to actually add a new one.

      Not sure if this has changed in 5.0, but the article doesn't mention a difference.

      --
      WeRelate.org - wiki-based genealogy
    5. Re:Root still the default login? by Radiate · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Every so often i read about the root/non-root user issue.

      Granted when having root access the entire OS can be FUBARed. But files which are important for me and probably many other users are those which are in my home folder and those aren't really protected and could be probably be deleted by any process without requiring root user access.

    6. Re:Root still the default login? by Taladar · · Score: 1

      So run processes that might be harmful as another user. Sure your files aren't protected from your access. How else should you work with them. But who says you (physical) have to be only one user (virtual).

    7. Re:Root still the default login? by Jack+Taylor · · Score: 1

      I'd be a bit annoyed if the rm command couldn't delete my own files...

      The word you're looking for is "backup". I've set my comp to backup using rsync - you can make daily backups to a different partition/disk/computer, make a new directory every day, but use hard links to only take up the disk space of incremental backups. And then make the parent folder only writable by root. Magical stuff...

      --
      One good turn - gets all the covers.
    8. Re:Root still the default login? by koreaman · · Score: 1

      I went into Fry's Electronics on Saturday, walked over to one of their Linspire computers, opened an Xterm, and was greeted by this:

      root ~/ #

      Does that answer your question?

  4. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  5. mimicking windows again by stygianguest · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't really see why distributions should mimic windows. Those who bother to install any os install like windows or some linuxes can probably adept to gnome or kde easily. And the windows interface definately aint the best around. The real problem is microsoft's hold of the big OEMs. To me that's the clearest abuse of their monopoly, yet they aren't really attacked for it...

    1. Re:mimicking windows again by BlueCodeWarrior · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Different strokes for different folks. I guess you aren't in Linspire's 'target market.'

    2. Re:mimicking windows again by joeljkp · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Many people don't install their own Linux. They're fed up with Windows so they get a friend to install it for them, or they work at a company that's switching. Either way, a familiar interface will be a good thing for these people.

      --
      WeRelate.org - wiki-based genealogy
    3. Re:mimicking windows again by dave420 · · Score: 1, Interesting
      Windows OS is better than any I have yet to see on Linux. Only OSX is better.

      It's not just how good screenshots work, but how fast windows move around the screen. How much of the GUI is hardware-accelerated. How tight the design is (as in how many flaws/glitches there are).

      I'm not trying to upset anyone here, but I've yet to see a non-windows/apple UI that doesn't scream "amateur".

      Windows and OSX have dedicated teams of professional designers, all working under ONE design manager. That ONE person calls the shots. No-one tells them they're wrong. They steer the entire design in one coherent direction. And, these guys have years and years and years of experience.

      This Lindows looks better, but the review showed some graphical glitches in the UI that are just unforgivable. That reason alone means I won't use it, as I don't want programming bugs distracting me from using my PC. I simply won't tolerate it.

    4. Re:mimicking windows again by stygianguest · · Score: 1

      Design of cause is a matter of taste, so fortunatly I can say I disagree and I like my gnome 2.0 better than windows. It's true though that windows has a smoother operating gui, but that's not going to change in linspire. So pratically, there's no market for linspire.

    5. Re:mimicking windows again by dave420 · · Score: 1
      I'm not talking about the specific design, but the actual tightness of the output. In every Linux gui I've used, there have been glitches. Fonts not rendering properly or bunched too close together, controls being all skewy, or some such distraction

      I'm a web developer, so I guess I have an eye for that. However, it's too damned much for me to use the GUIs for any length of time. My linux experience these days is via SSH - the design in that is perfect ;)

    6. Re:mimicking windows again by poofyhairguy82 · · Score: 1
      I'm not trying to upset anyone here, but I've yet to see a non-windows/apple UI that doesn't scream "amateur".

      Ever tried Gnome? Made me think my XP box was "my daughter's first PC" after I tried Gnome.

    7. Re:mimicking windows again by spagetti_code · · Score: 1
      Standards are a wonderful thing. And MS (bless their corporate hearts) have established a defacto standard for GUIs. Its not perfect, but its pretty good and most computer users know it.

      (Before you jump all over this one regarding who copied who and motif and Xerox Parc blah blah blah, take note: thats not the point - MS took GUIs to the masses and established a standard.)

      So given the defacto standard is there, you can either create something wild and new and get the respect of geeks like us, or you can create a better GUI based on MS's one and get the respect of the masses.

      When average joe strolls up to an MS PC and a Linspire PC sitting side by side at Walmart or Best Buy on a budget PC, and the MS one runs slower and is more expensive but they are otherwise very similar.... suddenly Linux is in with a chance. Its kinda sad that they couldn't keep using the name Lindows, that would have helped.

    8. Re:mimicking windows again by Synbiosis · · Score: 1

      Good, GOD, someone who agrees with me. I was afraid that /. was overrun by Linux zealots and Mac fanboys. (Oh wait, it still is.)

      One thing that really irks me about any Linux GUI is how much screen space they waste. Running Linux on 1024x768 is equivalent to running Windows on 800x600. 800x600 is a usable resolution for many people, but when you do photo editing and paper writing, you need all the screen space you can get.

      Hell, even Windows OSS programs have that problem- compare the amount of space OpenOffice wastes to Office 2k3, and the amount of space Gaim wastes when compared to Trillian.

      Ick.

    9. Re:mimicking windows again by Stregone · · Score: 1

      I haven't used Trillian for quite a while, but I remember the default skin was a huge ugly mess. I used a really tiny space saving skin. I use gaim these days and it isn't flexible enough to have those tiny skins but its still better than aim. You just need to turn off 'show buddy icons' in the buddy list options.

    10. Re:mimicking windows again by Bnonn · · Score: 1

      I guess you haven't seen Gnome recently then. And what graphical glitches are you talking about in Lindows. There's ots of fluff in your comment, but no actual arguments.

  6. Re:Whats the big deal by ites · · Score: 1

    a) it's "Ubuntu", not "unbunto".

    b) buying a distro is often a good choice.

    --
    Sig for sale or rent. One previous user. Inquire within.
  7. cnr by Mr_Silver · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Of course, once you have resorted to using raw apt-get, what's the point of Click-N-Run?

    Nothing.

    Unless, of course, you are in that 90% of the population that would rather gouge their eyes out with spoons than use the command line :)

    Don't forget the target audience for CNR is probably not the sort of people who hang around here or OSNews. For that, it does what it does pretty well.

    --
    Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    1. Re:cnr by djplurvert · · Score: 1

      Ubuntu installs synaptic by default...fwiw.

  8. Re:Which fanboy are you? by CdXiminez · · Score: 4, Informative

    Above is a dupe comment, which strangely enough got modded +5 funny the first time around and is now considered a troll. Such a lovely perfect analysis tool, this mod-system.

  9. dropshadowing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    from the article:
    "Dropshadowing in Linux is still pretty rare, and is not always very effective."
    pretty rare?
    I thought that anybody who used KDE,
    and had a fast computer, would have those turned on by default, (that kde wizard that makes thing look shinnnyyy...)
    or through the control panel.
    drop shadowing (IMHO) has been around since 3.1

    1. Re:dropshadowing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      You don't know what IMHO stands for, do you?

    2. Re:dropshadowing by nutshell42 · · Score: 3, Informative

      And the reason for the ghost effect with transparent menues (i.e. the previous menu is still visible below the current) is that the transparency is fake like all transparency in X without the composite extension. (It don't remember whether it's gonna be supported in 3.4. I think so but I'm not sure)

      --
      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage
    3. Re:dropshadowing by strider44 · · Score: 1

      Yes it is. I'm not sure to what degree though.

  10. This post is wonderful by strider44 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I wonder with Linspire the same thing I wonder about Paint Shop Pro. If they actually increased the price of Linspire to something only just lower (about five dollars) than Windows XP Home Ed., bundling the extras in, putting it in a pretty box in as many stores as they can (department stores, gaming stores, supermarkets even if they can), and releasing a discounted OEM version, then it might be even more successful. Right now it looks like a cheap Windows knockoff (cause basically that's what it is). If they started to project the same or similar image as Windows, projecting an image of superiority at a better price then people may consider it side by side with Windows very seriously indeed.

    People automatically assume you get what you pay for, even when a lot of the time that's completely false. An OS is a big important tool, and people are probably going to be careful. If they raise the price, I think people would take it more seriously, Linspire will make huge amounts of money and hopefully give back to linux, and linux would gain popularity as a result.

    Just me wondering...

    1. Re:This post is wonderful by arodland · · Score: 3, Interesting

      But it is the case with PSP, though. In the same class as Photoshop? No chance. I can get more done more easily with GIMP.

    2. Re:This post is wonderful by strider44 · · Score: 1

      I think one of the major barriers to PSP is that it is too cheap, and because of this it isn't really a competitor to photoshop - pros will pay for photoshop because it's just a drop in a bucket, and newbies will just pirate photoshop. They need to put up a serious case for pros on why they should buy this instead of photoshop.

      However this is a different case, even though I'm wondering the same thing. When people choose an operating system, they think "I'm stuck with this for a while aren't I?" They are more likely to dish out an extra bit of money for the "better" (which really means more expensive) Windows op system. If they made lindows just ever so slightly smaller price then more people they will pull into comparing the two as equal competitors. Stress on user friendliness and the huge app stack that comes with it, and Lindows may just win that comparison.

      And they need to spread, spread, spread. Put it everywhere.

    3. Re:This post is wonderful by archen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You have two types of people who use Photoshop. The types that pirate it because it's supposed to be a good graphics application, and the people who are very much into its functionallity and rely upon it. Jasc will never make money off of group one anyway even if PSP were beter than PS tomorrow. Group 2 are the sorts of people who really require the functionality of Photoshop. Either they will pirate it or buy it, but they need photoshop for a reason.

      I think Jasc has done a pretty good job with PSP. PSP9 costs $100 just like PSP5 did back in 97 when I bought it. The fairness of it's price and the very good functionality are the reasons it didn't fall into oblivion like so many other paint programs. If you go toe to toe with Photoshop, you better be prepared to match what Photoshop can do, and as much as I love PSP - it will sorely lose in that arena. And yeah, one of the biggest reasons I use Paint Shop Pro is because I can afford it, and the upgrade price is really good. Because I can afford it, I actually PAY for it.

    4. Re:This post is wonderful by Pike · · Score: 1

      good for you, but GIMP is widely acclaimed as a useability disaster.

    5. Re:This post is wonderful by arodland · · Score: 1

      Maybe that's just because the people whining about intuitive paradigmatization are a much more vocal group than those that realize that a computer isn't really a paintbrush, and that GIMP is incredibly powerful if you take the time to learn it. (Though admittedly it's not feature-complete yet, you can do a real lot with what's there.)

  11. DVD Playback by Smiffa2001 · · Score: 5, Funny

    "How can this be that a commercial OS doesn't include DVD playback?"

    Erm... I'd like to add another commercial OS that doesn't play DVD's right out of the box to this shocking list: Windows XP.

    At least with WMP9 I get a "Windows Media Player cannot play this DVD because a compatible DVD decoder is not installed on your computer".

    1. Re:DVD Playback by chill · · Score: 4, Informative

      However, adding legally-licensed DVD playback to Linspire is cheaper, faster and simpler than Windows. Their modified version of Xine w/the properly licensed codec costs $4.95 and installs from Click-n-Run in 30 seconds on a decent broadband connection.

      WinDVD is $49.95 (10x the price) and after you download and save you must then install and reboot. Not 30 seconds by any stretch.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    2. Re:DVD Playback by Beyond_GoodandEvil · · Score: 1

      How did you not get a copy of PowerDVD free w/ the DVD drive? I think it also came in the mail w/ samples of Tide.

      --
      I laughed at the weak who considered themselves good because they lacked claws.
    3. Re:DVD Playback by dave420 · · Score: 1, Insightful
      You have missed a massive, massive part of your example. When you install the DVD decoder in Windows, you can decode DVDs in ANY application that supports DirectShow. You can even link together your own filters in GraphEdit to process the DVD through ANY first/third-party filters installed on your machine.

      A DVD decoder in Windows isn't a stand-alone application, but an addition to the DirectShow architecture, which still is the most powerful and easy to use multimedia rendering solution available on the desktop.

    4. Re:DVD Playback by Piquan · · Score: 1

      A DVD decoder in Windows isn't a stand-alone application, but an addition to the DirectShow architecture, which still is the most powerful and easy to use multimedia rendering solution available on the desktop.

      How do you figure?

      I'm not looking to start a fight here, but why do you feel that DirectShow is more powerful and easier to use than Quicktime?

    5. Re:DVD Playback by As+Seen+On+TV · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure his multimedia rendering solution pap was just cut-and-paste from a Microsoft press release boilerplate.

    6. Re:DVD Playback by radish · · Score: 1

      WinDVD (or some equivalent) is also bundled with pretty much every video card or DVD drive sold in the last few years. I would be amazed to find anyone here who didn't have access to a legitimate copy of a windows DVD player.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    7. Re:DVD Playback by Chris+Brewer · · Score: 1

      Yes, but usually when you buy a DVD drive, you get playback software bundled with it. Guess what, the software is for Windows. If you don't have a DVD drive, why do you want DVD playback?

      --
      Consultancy: If you're not part of the solution, there's money to be made in prolonging the problem
  12. I would recommend Mandrakelinux 10.1 Official by joestar · · Score: 1, Informative
    There is a recent review of Mandrakelinux 10.1 Official on Newsforge: "For ease of use, Mandrakelinux can't beat. The Mandrakelinux Control Center is cleanly laid out and is probably the most intuitive on the market.", it's available here.


    I've been using Mdklinux 10.1 for several months and it's incredibly powerful and stable, with thousands applications available from a simple click or a urpmi. Really worth a try.


    Disclaimer: Newsforge is part of OSTG.

  13. Re:Click and Run by who+got+my+name · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think click-and-run fits very well with plug-and-pray ...

    --
    The only person who is capable of killing my karma, is me, do not even try to help me.
  14. Create partition ahead of time? by Drencrom · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Like in Linspire 4.0, you have to prep a partition ahead of time or take over the entire disk at install

    Is it only me or this should not happen in a new distro installer?
    More so considering it is oriented to windows users.

    1. Re:Create partition ahead of time? by schotty · · Score: 1

      Well then, why would you want the user to have to worry about partitioning then?

      Most users have no idea what the hell a partition is and would be confused none the less.

      --
      Sigs are nice guns ...
    2. Re:Create partition ahead of time? by Drencrom · · Score: 1

      I was thinking about windows users that also know how to install windows. They may know how to create a partition (windows installer allows this) but maybe they don't know how to do it without the windows installer.

      If Linspire "copy" the windows desktop they may also copy the installer...

  15. Re:Which fanboy are you? by arodland · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Fairly funny, but you might want to try spelling "Mandela" right from here on out. :)

  16. Re:Napoleon Dynamite? by gowen · · Score: 1

    The real first mistake was failing to cover up the fact they've made an illegal copy of Napoleon Dynamite.

    --
    Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
  17. + Mandrakelinux Corporate Desktop by joestar · · Score: 1

    I forgot to mention the newly released Mandrakelinux Corporate Desktop which looks very promising as a client OS for businesses. It's also very affordable ($109 with one-year 24x7 support).

  18. Doesn't it lock you into costly subscriptions? by gelfling · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Doesn't that kind of defeat the purpose? I mean here we have a desktop that requires more or less the same horsepower as Windows to run. Is slightly less functional than Windows to use strictly as a desktop and costs slightly less than windows to own? It doesn't seem like a wonderful bargain. Perhaps something like ELX or Vectorlinux which can be had for free and install on cheap hardware is the way to go instead of trying to reverse engineer the functionality of windows.

    I think the Linux folks need to accept that Windows really is a better choice for some functions at least from a simple "I just need to do what I do PoV" and if you go the Linux route it's not to replicate Windows functionality but instead to do someother thing, introduce some other function. Of course in a corporate environment the support costs of maintaining a Linux desktop evironment appear less in light of fewer security problems and an inherent ability to push updates to desktops but that has to be weighed against the skills of the user base and the questions and problems they will have. On the other hand unless your own time is free and you don't like managing the innumerable security patches, personal firewall, AV update, spyware circus that is home LAN administration for Windows then why not get a bunch of Macs? It's BSD based, pretty tough, industrial strength Unix under the covers and the price point of a MiniMac or an iMac make it pretty attractive.

    For the most part, that is. If you like bittwiddling and really want to build a something and that's your hobby then fine, have at it. But it really doesn't seem to make a lot of sense to struggle with a Linux desktop that isn't designed specifically around ease of installation and ease of use AND lower cost. If you need the same brand new high powered PC hardware to run it AND installation is still problematic AND configuration is still a chore AND you still have to struggle with NTFS volume mounts, Wine and Windows applications then what have you solved?

  19. Tutorial for newbie slashdotters by strider44 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    This is how you get cheap mod points: Google for something like this, see exactly the same post +5 in another slashdot blog and copy the comment in reply that got +5. Since it's only a few days ago you may assume it's still relevant. The other person, of course, will be more funny than you will ever be.

    What about the VMS fanboy, we wear cardigans, hush puppies, tweed hats and smoke pipes. We don't normally "shop" but when the leather elbow patches can no longer hang on or the felt is just too floppy, we vist the church op-shop. We always have a pencil and pad in our pocket and a small cylindrical slide rule for a quick estimate. Tuesday trivia night is our social highlight of week and the hot chocolate and lamingtons are wonderfull. We have wives but have grown to realise sex is really just another sports activity and would much rather play with the train set in the shed.


    Creds go to TapeCutter. Soon you shall actually find out who or what VMS is...
    1. Re:Tutorial for newbie slashdotters by strider44 · · Score: 1

      lol I was just making sure that "Gentoy" means "Gentoo", checking to see how offended some of my friends should be when I discovered your other post.

    2. Re:Tutorial for newbie slashdotters by Otter · · Score: 1
      Tuesday trivia night is our social highlight of week and the hot chocolate and lamingtons are wonderfull.

      For a more dignified approach to karma whoring, you can post a helpful definition:

      Lamingtons: Small squares of plain cake, dipped in melted chocolate and sugar and coated in desiccated coconut. Said to have been named after Baron Lamington (see below), a popular governor of Queensland from 1896 to 1901.

      Or you can simply berate the VMS guy for misspelling "wonderful".

    3. Re:Tutorial for newbie slashdotters by LourensV · · Score: 1

      Wait a minute...you are one of those "troll" things I heard about aren't you? I'm on to you! Attempting to trick innocent newbies like me into checking for dupes eh? On Slashdot? Ha!

      I'm not buying it. I'm going to call the karma police.

  20. Re:Napoleon Dynamite? by wild_berry · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm not worried about Napoleon Dynamite. I was worried about the Windows-like look and feel. Everything seems to look the same and is named the same...

    More lawsuits? Only against the people who miss the joke here. :P

  21. Re:Which fanboy are you? by geordie_loz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Surely if you were proud you wouldn't post anonymously...

  22. Re:Which fanboy are you? by CdXiminez · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hmm, my previous post appears to have attracted one of the harmful mod-points you so gallantly were trying to lead away from the serious posts.
    I had no idea my innocent observations had trolling-qualities hiding in them.
    I must be underestimating the power of my words.

  23. Re:Napoleon Dynamite? by Anonymous+2112 · · Score: 1

    Gaaaahh ... Idiots !!!!
    I think linspire will change their business profile
    from selling Linux systems to selling "Bust Must+" ..
    And plastic tupperware...
    ala "Onkel Rico"

  24. This doesn't look like anything new by gforceamg · · Score: 1, Flamebait
    I honestly don't see why so many people are hailing Linspire as a revolutionairy OS. It looks like a crazy amalgation of apps from Windows and Mac OS X. None of the stuff they are including in this release is new, they are simply stealing the new ideas from Apple and MS (e.g. showing common tasks in explorer windows, LPhoto similarities with iPhoto). Oh well, I guess it is as Picasso put it:
    "Good artists copy, great artists steal"
    1. Re:This doesn't look like anything new by djplurvert · · Score: 1

      Not that I would wish more lawsuits on the world, but this strikes me as exactly the sort of thing that trademark law was designed to protect against. LPhoto seems as close to iPhoto as say...Lindows seems to Windows.

      Perhaps the lawers can splain why this is or is not an issue...

    2. Re:This doesn't look like anything new by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not that I would wish more lawsuits on the world, but this strikes me as exactly the sort of thing that trademark law was designed to protect against. LPhoto seems as close to iPhoto as say...Lindows seems to Windows.

      Perhaps if apple wished to be protected by trademark law they should come up with a name that's a little more unique. Trademarks are intended to differentiate your business from other businesses, not to allow you to buy common words that describe your product so competitors can't use them.

      Shameless Plug: I have a new product on the market. It's called aProgram. I'm the only supplier, so if you see anyone else out there describing their products as aProgram, do let me know so I can sue them.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
  25. Good Link by sp3c1alK · · Score: 1

    Thanks.

  26. Score by pjt33 · · Score: 1

    Am I the only person who read the headline as a five-nil score for Linspire against First Look? So it's actually a version number, then?

  27. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  28. Re:mimicking windows again - because... by Conanymous+Award · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't really see why distributions should mimic windows. Those who bother to install any os install like windows or some linuxes can probably adept to gnome or kde easily.

    Emphasis on "those who bother". Linspire are aiming for Joe User. THE Joe User(TM), not even Joe Advanced User who might be able to do a format c: on his Windows PC every now and then or have the skills and curiosity to try out other apps than those which come with their OS.

    Joe User(TM) can't do this. He's the kind of guy who can only write email by clicking 'reply' in Outlook Express and who gets lost immediately if the IE logo on his Windows desktop is replaced by, say, Firefox. Joe Users are extremely conservative when it comes to computers, apps and their GUIs. If anything is changed, they panic and think they have to start all over with learning even that little stuff they've managed to learn with their computerphobia.

    This is the crowd Linspire are aiming for, and that's why they are making their Linux distro as redmondised as possible. They don't care about Joe Advanced Users or /.ers. Unfortunately, Joe Users(TM) are still the great majority among computer users.

    In my opinion, Linspire are right in doing so. Many other Linux distros overwhelm the n00bie with their abudance of software. Only advanced users long for a wealth of apps to begin with.

  29. Keep your eyes on the prize by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I think the Linux folks will keep up the hard work of development until they don't have to make any concessions to anybody.

    But to the extent that Joe Average has to make concessions to the Losedows monopoly, even a Mac can be a stretch. Anything Wintel boxen can do, Macs can do better (or could, if you judge the platform by what game titles get released for it) in a single-platform environment. But when my Dad asked me if he should buy a Mac, I had to realize I wasn't dealing with a YMMV kinda guy. He would flip out the first time a Macro or bullet point didn't make it from an Office 97 document into Office for Mac OS X. Even if the same thing happened between two Windoze-based titles, it wouldn't have the stigma of resulting from a departure from the mainstream. And yes, with Dad that's a major stigma.

    However, having installed cable modems and having watched pop-up windows with links to fake Windoze-update sites appear within a second of the plug hitting the ethernet port (when the user still has to open the provider's web page through their "garden wall" and submit a registration to get the modem set to keep giving out a DHCP lease), if Dad goes broadband I'm going to tell him to call me so I can schedule to be there.

    When you can tell the people who don't have one of us to come over, "You got hacked. You can either reinstall Windows and hope it doesn't happen again before you can download Zone Alarm, or slap in this Linux disc, let the auto-install do its thing, watch the help video, and not have a care in the world." Linux will absolutely explode in the consumer market. (Obviously they will and should have a care, but it can get a lot closer to true than it is for everyone else who makes that claim.)

    1. Re:Keep your eyes on the prize by gelfling · · Score: 3, Interesting

      That's certainly true from a security perspective but people don't really think that way otherwise they'd install functional software on the windows boxes they have and take at least rudimentary steps. Most commercial Windows boxes are loaded down with tons of security software now, McAfee, Symantec and others preload their stuff on and all you have to do is pay for a real licence after the 60 day trial period is up. But nearly no one does that nor do they bother to look for or download a free product nor would they understand how to do that or how to install it. Hell my kids alternatively ignore or click w/o thinking ZA popups all the time. They regularly manage to have all sorts of crap autoinstall that they claim they didn't know how it got there. My family doesn't actually understand the difference between a)the browser b) the computer c) the internet. Seriously, it's all the same thing.

      So here's the point. If people cared about security they'd do something. So giving them a Linux box and telling them it's more secure has almost no value. Telling them they'll have to babysit it less has no value because they don't do that now. You do. The only thing you can sell them on is a) popups (which you can do with Firefox/Netscape on Windows and b) some kind of spin on identity theft as in not letting strangers into your box to steal something. What might work is if you can sell them on the idea for getting as good or better 'security' for far less money. If you let them buy a maching for their kids it's going to have to serve a very schizophrenic set of requirements. It will have to play games and it will have to protect the wittle kiddies from pictures of penises and vaginas. And it will have to run all of the file formats they use in school and it will have to burn CDs with zero effort and, and this is little noted, it will have to boot in under 2 minutes. More than that and you will hear an endless littany of "The computer's broken again..." You also need to build the system that will be able to restart from an abrupt shutdown very quickly and it can't ask the user any questions like 'do you want to fsck?'

      I've seen people throw away new computers after they were massively infected with viruses and spyware, have highly fragmented drives or suffered a minor object corruption in an office suite rendering it buggy or inoperable even though they had the installation media. I don't mean have someone tear it down and rebuild the software from scratch I mean unplug it and move it to the basement will all of Dad's other toys in the Museum of Bad Ideas. And go out and but a new one only to have the same thing happen in a year or less. They are left with the conclusion that all computers are shitty little toys that no one should ever bother to learn how to use.

      I think this is the sweetspot that Apple is shooting for. It's one that's probably out of MS grasp forever having surrendered reliability on the altar of whatever the hell is good for MS's bottom line. Linux needs to shoot for that middle space between expensive mindless Mac reliability cheap useless high maintenance PCs. It has to look and feel like Windows or Apple and it has to run w/o any human intervention and it has to run without glitches or problems or delays or pages of boot up messages and it has to mask the filesystem from the user and instead use folders or Mac like containers. It has to recover quickly and gracefully and it has to report errors or problems in clear stupid partially informative messages that do more handholding than instruction.

  30. Linspire= future of desktop linux by acomj · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Linspire although often put down by geeks as unsophisticated compared to its debian/geentoo/redhat/ madrake.

    Note that if you poke around the homepage, no mention of if KDE/Gnome is the desktop of choice. The users he's targeting don't care, they just want a machine that works, without popups and spyware.. They "click and run" subscription seems like apt-get but for money and easier.

    Linspire however represents linux's best attempt to make a Linux OS that anyone including your grandmother can use. Its not great yet, but its pretty ok. And comming pre-installed on machines from walmart\ and microcenter and it seems pretty affordable, so it seems to have some traction.

    They want to be the mac os-x of linux world. Just look at their homepage . Look like this? Its not coincidence.

    Heck they even have a itunes "clone" they sell. called lsongs. (l for linux/ songs = tunes, get it ).

    Software is a funny business. Volume means alot.
    So if linspire is making money, expect it to improve. Hopefully all improvements they make come back and make all linux's better.

    1. Re:Linspire= future of desktop linux by matvei · · Score: 1
      Heck they even have a itunes "clone" they sell. called lsongs. (l for linux/ songs = tunes, get it ).
      Who would pay for Linux songs when you can get them for free :-P
  31. Re:Napoleon Dynamite? by Wordsmith · · Score: 1

    Actually, the first mistake was using a screenshot of windows for a Linspire review.

  32. What is this about? by KlomDark · · Score: 2, Funny

    Linux for cops?

  33. Re:Needs help by Sophrosyne · · Score: 3, Funny

    I agree... here is a great sentence:
    Now, burning a DVD was fairly easy using K3b. While burning a DVD, however, the system was fairly slow.
    Edited:
    Burning a DVD was fairly easy using K3b, but the system was fairly slow.
    These fairly elementary mistakes-- Someone really should rewrite this article.

  34. Re:mimicking windows again - because... by stygianguest · · Score: 1

    You're probably right and I understand this is the motivation to make linspire. But as you say yourself, Joe Average is unable to install a new OS. Which means that they won't ever come to try linspire unless it comes pre-installed with the computer, which doesn't seem to be happening anytime soon.

  35. Re:Why we must fight Linspire... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    You are SOOOO clueless!

    Linspire is 100% open source WITH TWO EXCEPTIONS:

    1. Their CNR (click n run) which is actually more a service anyway, not software. This is how they make their money.

    2. They DO include licensed 3rd party codecs, such as Flash, Java, Quick Time, Windows Media, MP3, DVD Playback, etc. This, however, is exactly what I like about Linspire. Sure, they work with Ogg, and open formats just like any distro, but the world is full of flash, java, quick time, etc. as well, so I'm glad they play these formats. What good is a web browser if you can't use half the web sites???

    Linspire has done A LOT for open source and GIVEN ALL THE CODE BACK. Lsongs, Nvu, Lphoto, Mozilla, etc.

    http://linspire.com/opensource

    Your comments only show your ignorance.

    I've learned to ONLY post on Slashdot when I know of something FIRST HAND. Others here just have to chime in on EVERY topic, even if they don't have any first-hand knowledge or insight into the topic.

    Hans

  36. Why you must chill out ... by WankersRevenge · · Score: 1

    As far as I know, Linspire is complying with the GPL and other licenses. Their process might deviate from traditional Unix norms but it's their product. The beautiful thing about open source (and freedom in general) is that it allows people to do things that you might not agree with.

  37. oops by stygianguest · · Score: 1

    i meant to say there's no market because joe avarage cant install it, and it will not be available preinstalled in the foreseable future....

  38. Linspire Is by KingBahamut · · Score: 1

    1. Too Windowsy, No linux geek is his right mind would espouse to using it, at least not the ones I know.

    2. Its a Debian clone, if you turn around and try to change sources.list , then update it. Youll break a number of things. This happens similiarly with Xandros, but most of Xandros's own repositories arent bad.

    3. It costs money. If im going to buy a distribution, Im going to buy an industry level solution (Suse and/or NLD). Robertson has a good idea, but not enough umph behind it.

    my .02$.

    --
    "God of Rock, thank you for this chance to kick ass. "
  39. What that all "Linspires" me... by MerlinTheWizard · · Score: 1

    How to make money off something others give away for free?

    There is almost nothing worth the buy compared to another "desktop-oriented" distro. Slick look? You can have thousands of "looks" for your KDE or Gnome desktop for free. From the screenshots, Linspire obviously uses KDE. They could have at least developed a new desktop environment if they wanted to sell something "different". As for security and overall "up-to-date-ness", I'm pretty sure you're well better off with one of the major distros out there.

    And last but not least, the very fact that they strive hard to get people to like them because they are trying to be close to Windows enough to interest them is a failure, in my opinion, right from the start. People who like Windows, well, they just want the real thing. Everyone knows, let's not deny it, that even the ones who can't afford Windows but like it - they will use pirated copies instead of using Linux or another OS.

    Don't get me wrong, I have nothing against selling service around a Linux distro - but Linspire? Seems like you don't get much aside from marketing. Which is better for them than it is for you.

  40. You have to understand one thing by Man+in+Spandex · · Score: 1

    Unless the end-user (or average joe) has friends that know what Linux is, theres some good chances that they have no clue that something other than Windows exists.

    That being said, regardless of how "bad" Linspire seems compared to other open distros, it's these kind of products that people see and hear about because they'll market it if they want to have "some" success.

    Linux will never grow if it's never heard of outside the net.

    1. Re:You have to understand one thing by Man+in+Spandex · · Score: 1

      Sorry for that last sentence. I mean "Linux" will never reach the end-user/average joe

    2. Re:You have to understand one thing by joestar · · Score: 1


      > Linux will never grow if it's never heard of outside the net.

      That was the kind of thing we all heard 10 years ago about Linux as a server. Trust me, the Linux-desktop adoption won't need Linspire, as soon as it's ready for Joe users' desktop. But right now, it's not yet, in particular because all these commercial apps you can use under Windows and which aren't yet available under Linux.

  41. Re:Why we must fight Linspire... by As+Seen+On+TV · · Score: 1

    Linspire is in my opinion a closed-world project that we must fight

    Ask me again why Linux has remained stagnant for the past four years.

  42. Re:Which fanboy are you? by kyousum · · Score: 1

    I moddes it Flaimbait the first time and got meta-modded Unfair. Life is not always fair..

    --
    but why not?
  43. Re:Why we must fight Linspire... by rpdillon · · Score: 1

    Stagnant? Linux has gained the ability to market itself as a desktop OS in the past four years. Enough said.

    Oh crap, you were trolling and I took the bait...

  44. great idea by Random+Web+Developer · · Score: 1

    that's just lovely
    - put 2 links to ostg partners in blurb
    - get submission accepted because of free adspace for patners
    - end up slashdotting the site, so far for the free ads then, and i have no clue what other distro's you meant (suse, novell or redhat id guess)

    --
    Artists against online scams http://www.aa419.org/
  45. Re:Why we must fight Linspire... by joestar · · Score: 1

    I'm using Mandrakelinux 10.1 Official as my desktop OS, with a scanner, a printer, a Nikon D-70, a webcam, WiFi and so on. I'm burning DVD with music and DivX films (shame on me), I'm using Firefox, OpenOffice.org... and everything really works great.

    I'm not using Windows anymore and these improvements have been performed during the past four years.

  46. HEATHEN! by TheLittleJetson · · Score: 1


  47. Same old awful product... by cwestpha · · Score: 1

    The entire idea of Linspire is flawed. You combine the worst aspects of Linux with the worst aspects of Windows. If people just keep on trying to copy Microsoft products and only see compatability as their main goal then nothing revolutionary is going to happen. Look at Linux. Most of Linux development recently has been trying to challenge M$ and get a simmilar look and feel. I am sorry but you are dooming yourself if your primary goal is to play catch up.

  48. Re:Which fanboy are you? by CdXiminez · · Score: 1

    Since I never intended to offend anyone, I feel vindicated :-)
    Or do you mean that you modded the fanboy-list as Flamebait?

  49. Basic comments on reviews by zogger · · Score: 1

    7/8ths or something of all the distros out there are now debian clones it appears on a casual glance at distro watch. The bummer is, it's tedious as all get out to try them all out if you are stuck on dialup and your burner has a mind of it's own and only works hit or miss. That leaves sending away mailorder for CDs, which gets old after awhile. Every time I try a new one, something else is broken it appears, given that I am referring to this "me" guy and "me's" personal machine, not any generic other posters experience. Example, I have a semi recent knoppix, ubuntu and mepis. Knoppix and Mepis dialout and actually give me an internet connect, which is my personal "killer app" and deal breaker, because I primarily use a computer for web surfing and listening to net stream radio, and that's about it. Ubuntu just sat there, and after hitting several evenings in a row trying to find out how to fix it and getting nowhere fast, that was it, that deal was broken. All three are debian based though, so one has to wonder.... but for joe schmoo next door,another random example, he runs wireless in his house and is interested in primarily SOHO business type things to do with a computer, maybe, so for him that stuff better be on the distro and work adequately or it's a deal breaker for him. And so on and so forth. And how many people as a percentage of the computer using population are going to go down the list of HUNDREDS of various distros to see which one works the best? Really? Safe to say some number less than 1%. So what do you do then, read a review? Reviews are BROKEN. Let's just admit reality, reviews cannot adequately address the issues faced by most people, because performance is so very random and hit or miss. Nature of the beast and all.

    And people have a habit of jumping back in forth on posting reviews from speaking in general terms to speaking in personal experience terms,completely mixing them up in implied appearance, because it's extremely hard to do both. See, I just had to do it myself up above. You can't do it otherwise, it's impossible. For some people,joe reviewer or commentator, distro x works well,or so claim subset x fanclub, but the same exact distro installed on someone elses machine will work radically different from hardware issues and might have several broken apps,so then distro Y fanclub chimes in with "neener neener you lame luser, use our stuff and..." really, after years of reading this sort of thing it has gotten beyond silly..

    In that sense, OS reviews on the internet in general are broken themselves, the entire "review" concept is flawed,there is no patch available to fix it, they can't really be reviewed adequately consistently or even fairly, the variables are just too huge.

    This is why Mac has always been more consistent than not (obvious hardware/software integration at vendor/developer level), Windows is closer but always still hit or miss, and Linux is even further into hit or miss. I think it's safe to say that is a valid postulate. That's been my experience so far anyway and from everything I have read over the years. For real the only consistent way is for the OS, whichever one it is, is to come pre installed on hardware that the vendors tweak for the user in advance, at least to a point of near perfect useability within currently available software and hardware design constraints, then also applying the IP laws to it. It's a rough row to hoe otherwise.

    With that said, I read the list of improvements that this company offers and it seems most decent enough, and you have to admit there's not a lot of ways around those propietary apps and licensing short of paying the money or not including them if you want to distribute in the US officially as a company. They have taken the only rational way for them to take on this issue. It seems like they are doing the best they can, ease of use/features/price. What else could a company do?

    I think it would be better as reviews go to do the "OS review" thing based on one of the vendo

  50. Is it just me... by millennial · · Score: 2, Insightful
    ... or is the first screenshot from a Windows XP machine with a silver skin?
    See for yourself...

    Maybe it's just me, but I didn't think it was possible to run MMC applications under Linux... and the fact that the WINDOWS LOGO is in the Start button kinda gives me the feeling that this is Windows. The Linspire folks wouldn't dare use that logo in an official release...

    Also, notice:
    • the disks have drive letters (e.g. D:)
    • My Computer is identical to the Windows XP version
    • ... PowerDVD? DVD Decrypter? AD-AWARE? This is WINDOWS!

    Why would you put a Windows screenshot in a story about Linspire 5-0's first look? That's pretty deceptive.
    --
    I am scientifically inaccurate.
    1. Re:Is it just me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Congrats. You successfully identified the Windows XP desktop. Had you read the article, you'd know why there was an XP screenshot displaying the partition problem.

    2. Re:Is it just me... by millennial · · Score: 1

      Actually, he never says that he put a Windows screenshot in there. He just said that he made a mistake while partitioning.

      --
      I am scientifically inaccurate.
  51. Re:Why we must fight Linspire... by jubei · · Score: 1

    I have not found any place to download lsongs, or lphoto.

    Apparently you can buy them for $20 though.

  52. Re:Why we must fight Linspire... by daddymac · · Score: 1

    I couldn't find a download either. and apperently you can buy them for 20 dollars, but they *only* work with linspire. If I'm incorrect, please someone let me know, the only thing keeping my fiance on windows is her Mp3 player, if it would worth with linux she'd make the switch immediately!

    --
    If something I said can be interpreted two ways, and one of the ways makes you sad or angry, I meant the other one.
  53. you are welcome by zogger · · Score: 1

    thanks for reading and replying. I hope some of the "me too" distro makers decide to bite the ego bullet and decide to combine forces and produce a single unified "linux" that is slower to release but a lot more of this "rock solid" and functional, and then take strength of product and strength of lobbying pressure and get the vendors to carry it and they will in turn get the governments to stop being dorks about things. that's how the world works.

    There's too many new and shiny wheels being invented that are trying to masquerade as the entire car, if that makes any sense.

    Even if some of the already established major linux vendors would combine forces it might help. I can't put my finger on it exactly but I think this is a critical juncture for "linux" and if it doesn't start to standardize soon with "the community" and get it's act together that it will be relegated to a small handful of big hardware vendors who will do it for them, and they will then step back and wonder where that ten ton truck came from and why did they get run over by it. And by this I mean the "more weird IP laws and even wierder hardware laws", because if you stand up and put your nose to the wind you can smell it coming now, and it's stench is foul.

  54. Re:Why we must fight Linspire... by XeXeN · · Score: 1

    Actually, if people would do their research before posting, you would find out that Linspire has done a lot for OSS. They have contributed to wine,kde,mozilla,kde-look.org,reiser just to name a few actually (5). As for as Lsongs and Lphoto, they are written in python so you can get it to work on any distro with python installed.

    LSongs Source
    LSongs Tarball
    LPhoto Source
    LPhoto Tarball

  55. Re:mimicking windows again - because... by skiman1979 · · Score: 1
    not even Joe Advanced User who might be able to do a format c: on his Windows PC every now and then

    If Joe Advanced User formats his main system hard drive now and then, I'd have to say he's not that advanced. He may know the commands, but if he's always formatting his hard drive, he's going to have to reinstall Windows. The more advanced user would know how to maintain his system enough so he doesn't have to format/reinstall every now and then.

    --
    Having a smoking section in a public restaurant is like having a peeing section in a public swimming pool.
  56. Re:Which fanboy are you? by kyousum · · Score: 1

    Yes, that is what I meant.

    --
    but why not?