Slashdot Mirror


Mandrakesoft Acquires Conectiva

rednaxel writes "This morning, both companies issued press releases about the merge. French Mandrakesoft is acquiring all shares of brazilian Conectiva for a total amount of 1.79 million EUR (2.3 million USD) in stock." CNet has coverage of the merger as well. From the article: "This won't elevate us to the status of Red Hat or Novell/SuSE yet, of course, but this is a significant growth for us..."

49 of 229 comments (clear)

  1. How? by sfraggle · · Score: 4, Interesting

    How do they have the money to do this? Werent they almost bankrupt about a year ago?

    --
    were you expecting to see a sig here? perhaps you'd rather see the inside of an ambulance!
    1. Re:How? by minus_273 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      actually, how how, do they make money by giving their product away for free? I can see red hat doing consulting/support, but mandrake caters to a different market

      --
      The war with islam is a war on the beast
      The war on terror is a war for peace
    2. Re:How? by crow · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's a stock swap. No money is involved. This is typical of how mergers often work. The companies agree to merge, and they agree what the company being acquired is worth, do some math, and convert the shares of the acquired company into shares of the new company. The math is much like doing a stock split, though the ratio usually involves a number of decimal points. (The accounting for the investors is also much like a stock split.)

      The real question in this case is why is Mandrakesoft's stock worth enough for Conectiva investors to consider this to be a worthwhile deal (as opposed to grabbing on to a sinking ship). I haven't looked at the business side of either company, so I can't comment there.

    3. Re:How? by ReverendLoki · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Actually, I think it was 3 or 4 years ago, but not only were they almost bankrupt, they actually were in bankruptcy in the French court system. They got their act together though, and have come completely out of bankruptcy, and I believe have been in the black for a while now.

      As far as I know, their main sources of revenue are from consulting, corporate support, some value added like packages of various proprietary closed-source software to their OS, and through their club membership program. I understand that this last one has been a decent boon to their books, moreso than one may think. Of course, I am not an accountant...

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    4. Re:How? by morcego · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I find this particularly intriguing, since ABN-AMRO Bank has been the major shareholder (50%+) of Conectiva last time I checked. Most than US$ 2Mil worth of stocks.

      Anyone knows how much (if anything) of Mandrake stocks are held by ABN ?

      Looks like (from the numbers) Mandrake is getting only the remaing stocks still help incompany by the original founders of Conectiva.

      Unless there is some big involvment of ABN on Mandrake, I find this all very strange.

      --
      morcego
    5. Re:How? by papaia · · Score: 3, Informative

      How? - simply: it's people like myself, who have identified them as having a proper business model (Mandrake Club subscriptions + a well established support community + very good paid support + products which fit every requirement I had, in time, and within costs (e.g. latest being the 64-bit CPU support among the first distros), who have then - provided the finacial support they needed (as a result of their services, of course)
      ... and when the US economy got derailed but its leadership, a small migration of my money, from US stocks, into MDKFF stock, came to prove to me, in time, that they also knew and know HOW to make money ;)

      --
      == With enough Will Power, one could move mountains. With enough Brains, one would just leave them where they are ==
    6. Re:How? by DCowern · · Score: 2, Interesting

      How do they have the money to do this? Werent they almost bankrupt about a year ago?

      First, their financial situation was never as bad as it sounded. They had no money and couldn't fulfil debt obligations because a previous board of directors had moved them into to many business areas that were too far removed from their core business model (which has always been selling support and services to corporations).

      Once they axed the former board, ceased unprofitable ventures, and got back to their core profitable model, things quickly improved. Their financial reports and quarterly summaries on their website go in to much more detail.

      Secondly, they beefed up their Mandrake Club offering. It's currently a substantial portion of their revenue (I want to say 20-25%).

      Third, released a bunch of stock a few years ago in an attempt to raise capital to renegotiate and pay off debt.

      Lastly, the rules governing bankruptcy in France are far more forgiving and lenient than they are in the US. Mandrake wisely used the time and mechanisms that the bankruptcy filing awarded them and they're now seeing the benefits as they are on extremely sound financial footing.

      By the way, yes, I am a shareholder and this news makes me very happy. The leadership at Mandrakesoft over the past few years has been excellent and I have faith in their ability to grow their company. Besides, with a 300% rise in their stock price in the last 4 months, I can't complain too much, now can I? =P

    7. Re:How? by DCowern · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Facts, please.

      Mandrake club is currently less than or equal to 28% of their revenue, not the 80% you claim. From their latest quarterly summary:

      Product sales amounted to 51% of revenues, enterprise services 21% and online sales and services 28%.

      So you're dead wrong about where their money comes from.

      Also, your numbers are slightly off. According to that same report, Mandrake is worth about 40 million euros (market value); that's about 50 million USD. Sure, they're not the size of RedHat but that's one of the reasons I like them.

      I don't know where you got the loss figure from but I bought the stock at 2.1 euros. On 4 August 2004, it was 2.39 Euros. It is now 7.60 Euros. Unless Canadian math is different than American math, that's a 317% growth in the period from August 2004 to February 2005. Overall, that's a growh of about 361%. That's not a bad return over the 2.5 years that I've owned the stock

      Representing your opinion and numbers you pull out of your ass as fact is embarassing when people call you on it, eh? ;-)

      And oh, by the way, I happen to like M. LeMarois. He's always been cordial and straightforward in my dealings with him and he seems to have a good idea of where the company should be headed. That, of course, is just my opinion.

    8. Re:How? by ThinWhiteDuke · · Score: 2, Informative

      You're mostly right, it's a paper transaction that does not involve cash. The seller is paid in Mandrake stock, not in cash.

      Yet your analogy with stock splits is erroneous. In a stock split, nothing really happens. Each old share becomes 2 or 10 new shares. It's just a story of splitting the cake in more pieces, but everybody still has the same proportion of the cake. An investor that used to own 1% of the stock will own twice (or ten times) more shares but still own 1% because the total number of outstanding shares has been doubled (decupled).

      In a merger, the cake increases but you have a smaller part of it. An investor owning 1% of Mandrake before the deal will now own 0.96% of Mandrake+Conectiva (since Mandrake's market cap seems to be around 40mEUR).

      --

      It would be nice to be sure of anything the way some people are of everything.
    9. Re:How? by legirons · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "actually, how how, do they make money by giving their product away for free?"

      They sell their product. For between $30 and $150 per box. And people like me buy it, so they make money.

      It might sound odd to buy something that you can download without charge (or buy CDs for $6), but really that's just a convenient aspect of the distribution mechanism. If I lose my boxed copy of Mandrake, I can make a copy, download, or buy a cheap copy. (Compare that to other operating-systems, where if you so much as change a hard-drive, you have to beg for permission to continue using the OS)

      It might still seem odd to pay when you can freeload, but my opinion of that is that I'm paying for the future availability of Mandrake. (just like I pay for wikipedia even though it's free) -- we're buying the ability for anyone in the world to use the best OS without charge. And that's quite different to paying for just a license.

  2. New Name by Conorb · · Score: 3, Funny

    Mandrakiva ?

    1. Re:New Name by Elranzer · · Score: 2, Funny

      Mandriva.... Man-gina Linux?

  3. What does MandrakeSoft gain? by kevin_conaway · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm not terribly familiar with Conectiva. What does the Mandrake distribution gain with this merger? Just more experienced developers or did Conectiva have certain features that made it attractive? Or are they just combining forces?

    1. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Brazil's government announced earlier this year it was planning to switch 300,000 PCs from Windows to Linux. I don't know if any contracts have been signed already, but I guess it's not unlikely they would favor a distributor based in Brazil (similar to when the city of Munich went with SuSE).

    2. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by Coryoth · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm not terribly familiar with Conectiva. What does the Mandrake distribution gain with this merger? Just more experienced developers or did Conectiva have certain features that made it attractive?

      Well Connectiva were one of the first distributions to embrace apt-rpm (they may even have done a lot of the development work, I can't recall) and provide some of the major development impetus behind Synpatic which is far and away the best GUI package manager around. As far as I am concerned what Mandrake could gain from Connectiva is a move to apt-rpm and Synaptic. I know URPMI has a lot of fans but I think apt and Aynaptic may be the way to go for pakcage management. It helps standardise things as well - all the Debian based distros use apt, and several use Synaptic by default as well, and despite yum being the default apt-rpm and Synaptic is very popular on Fedora, and even SuSE (instead of YaST).

      At the very least I hope Connectiva stays with apt-rpm and Synaptic. I would hate to see them shift to URPMI at this stage.

      Jedidiah.

    3. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by NicolaiBSD · · Score: 5, Informative
      which doesn't give it much weight as far as I'm concerned as I wouldn't trust a pile of shit from .br

      Marcelo Tosatti has been maintaining the 2.4 kernels you've been running for a long time. He's a Brazilian working for Conectiva.

      You on the other hand are an asshole.

    4. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by Espectr0 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Marcelo Tosatti has been maintaining the 2.4 kernels you've been running for a long time. He's a Brazilian working for Conectiva.

      Actually, he left Conectiva a long time ago

    5. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by leoboiko · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Conectiva made apt-rpm. They also made the smart package manager, which I think is underrated. I hope the Mandrake guys see its potential.

      Conectiva Linux will not exactly shift to urpmi, but instead it will be merged into Mandrake Linux.

      And remember guys, we're called Conectiva, with a single "n".

      --
      Prescriptive grammar:linguistics :: alchemy:chemistry. Stop being a nazi and learn some science.
    6. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by bryam · · Score: 3, Insightful


      Marcelo works for Cyclades @ Brazil.

    7. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by leoboiko · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Sorry, Lucio, but our country is spelled "Brazil" (and therefore "Brazilians") in English, and this is an English-speaking site. But we have a lot to be proud of from Conectiva, including tosatti, acme, apt-rpm, synaptic, smart, the vesa driver for X...

      --
      Prescriptive grammar:linguistics :: alchemy:chemistry. Stop being a nazi and learn some science.
    8. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by ggvaidya · · Score: 2, Funny

      You on the other hand are an asshole.

      And they moderate it "informative" and "insightful". Go mods! :)

    9. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by andreweb · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just a note: in Brazil we speak Portuguese, not spanish.... we dont' say "libré" here.... we say "livre"

    10. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by leoboiko · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Do you know the names of all countries of the world in their own languages? Can you write and pronounce them all? Most Brazilians wouldn't be able to pronounce "United States of America" or "Nippon" or "Ukrayina" or "Bundesrepublik Deutschland", and they should not be required to. In fact, on slashdot I can't even input the cyrillic and kanji characters I'd need above. What we call "China" is Zhongguo, written with ideographic hanzi, and Chinese has five different vowel intonations; want to give a try at pronouncing or writing it?

      Each language has its own idiosyncrasies. People shouldn't be required to learn the writing, spelling and pronounciation conventions of other languages, even for country names.

      --
      Prescriptive grammar:linguistics :: alchemy:chemistry. Stop being a nazi and learn some science.
    11. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by Simon · · Score: 4, Insightful
      What does the Mandrake distribution gain with this merger?

      As far as I am concerned what Mandrake could gain from Connectiva is a move to apt-rpm and Synaptic.

      huh? Mandrake can move to apt-rpm and Synaptic any time they want. They don't have to merge with Conectiva to do that! It's Free Software after all.

      The merger has got little to do with software and technical features, and everything to do with getting entry to South American markets.

      Besides, both are heading towards the SMART package manager.

      --
      Simon

    12. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by orasio · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The guy hit two out of three.

      Marcelo works in Brasil. Hit.
      Marcelo doesn't work for Conectiva anymore. Miss.
      garcia is an asshole. Hit.

      That's enough "informative" for me.

    13. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by morcego · · Score: 2

      Neither dpkg or rpm can solve dependencies, unfortunately. They will point the dependencies, but not solve them.

      That is why urpm/apt/smart are needed.

      --
      morcego
    14. Re:What does MandrakeSoft gain? by Acer500 · · Score: 2, Informative

      You mistook Paraguay for Uruguay (a fairly common mistake, but I'm from Uruguay so I should know).

      Yes, the name of the country is in native language, but the brother one of the first Presidents slaughtered all of our Indians - Uruguay and Costa Rica are about the only American countries without natives.

      Back on topic, I'd say that buying Conectiva is a smart move, because Linux capitalizes on the anti-American (and anti-Microsoft) feeling that the current left wing presidents share, so it wouldn't be strange if the local governments switched to Linux (aided by Conectiva or whatever Linux support there is).

      --
      There are three kinds of lies: lies, damned lies, and statistics.
  4. Re:From the press release: by Conorb · · Score: 3, Insightful

    With Suse now an American brand (Novell) I think they might just be the number one European Linux company

  5. Re:From the press release: by Emporerx · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I don't know about Europe, but I thoroughly enjoy Mandrake. I'm wondering what, if any, effect this is going to have on future releases.
    I'm biased because Mandrake really got me into the linux field and away from Micro$oft products. And linux has made computing fun to me again, which has not been the case for some years now.
    I say, if they are trying to make things a little more uniform with these sorts of mergers(software, releases, security) then yay for them. Let's see how it turns out.

  6. Uh oh... by yuckysocks · · Score: 2, Funny

    MandrakeSoft, why, you could abbreviate that MS. And MS is aquiring companies and getting bigger?
    I think I just felt my knee jerk a little bit...

    *Runs for the hills*

  7. Been with Mandrake for years by kbahey · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Being a Mandrake user for several years, I am happy to see that they overcame their financial difficulties and are in a position to expand.

    Apart from the botched 9.2 upgrade debacle, they have a distro that I can use for a Linux home network without spending too much time on it. I have four machines running Linux at home, and don't want to spend a lot of time on each configuring it.

    They are also familiar and friendly enough for my kids to use it as their only desktop. They get to play their MP3, use FireFox or Konqueror, use Open Office for homework, ...etc.

    Moreover, it is also perfectly good as a server for LAMP, Samba, ...etc.

    Go Mandrake!

    1. Re:Been with Mandrake for years by isotropique · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Mandrake is a company from France. They put a lot of efforts to document and translate Linux applications in french for their own market. I think their acquisition of Conectiva follows the same logic. Portuguese speaking people should be pleased by the announcement since it means more applications will be available in their own language.

      I'm from Quebec and my primary language is French. I do not use Mandrake Linux but I feel their implication in the Linux movement improved my own experience. Vive Mandrake!

  8. Re:Yet? by Wudbaer · · Score: 3, Informative

    Big surprise for you: Almost all larger companies have mergers and aquisitions as part of their growth strategies, some in some periods of their existence even as a sole means of growth. This is neither a secret nor limited to MS.

  9. Re:Yet? by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Don't be so drawn in by the knee-jerk reactions to think that "acquisitions and mergers" are always a bad thing. You buy other companies to gain market share, brands, add to your own line of products and services, etc.

    Such a move is often good for consumers, too. Imagine what would happen if all of the cell phone companies were small, local businesses. Not only would your service be crappy, but support and prices would probably suck too. By combining into a few major players, you get national service, a sturdy support system, and longevity - they're less likely to fold and leave you hanging.

    You don't get to be the richest man in the world by letting your competition win.

  10. Re:Novell/SuSE by Wudbaer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Novell bought Ximian, not Xandros. Also cool stuff but different company. :-) Or did I miss something ?

  11. Mandrakesoft = (very) profitable company by joestar · · Score: 4, Informative

    From the PR: "Mandrakesoft, founded in 1998, is the internationally recognized number one European Linux company. Mandrakesoft has built its business by designing and delivering user-friendly Linux products to both individuals and businesses, building a user base of more than 4 million users. In its latest fiscal year, Mandrakesoft's revenues reached 5.18 million EUR (6.7 million USD) for a net income of 1.39 million EUR (1.8 million USD)."

    1. Re:Mandrakesoft = (very) profitable company by Raumkraut · · Score: 2, Informative

      They are on Yahoo finance - their symbol is "make.pa"

    2. Re:Mandrakesoft = (very) profitable company by joestar · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Do the ratio: 1.8 income / 6.7 revenues = 26.8%. Quite efficient.

  12. Kicking MS out of the 5th largest country? by gelfling · · Score: 4, Funny

    What with the Brazilian government wanting to kick MS off all government desktops, the fact that a disproportionate number of distros come from Brazil & it's the 5th most populous country in the world I'd say it's somewhat strategic in nature for Mandrake to do this.

  13. Re:From the press release: by AkaXakA · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As if Suse, being based in Germany suddenly don't count anymore now they've been bought by (the American) Novel.

    Actually, after this merger, only Red Hat of all the big distro's is still on it's own.

    I wonder how long that'll last. Then again, who's left to buy them?

  14. Re:No mucho? by morcego · · Score: 4, Informative

    Let me clear some misconceptions on your post.

    First, the majority of Conectiva users speak portugues, not spanish. I would guess at least 70% of the user base is in Brazil.

    Second, Conectiva has been profitable for some time now, so this won't be exactly saving the Conectiva platform, as if it were dying.

    Conectiva has some big corporate customers, including several banks. One of them is even using Conectiva Linux on their ATM machine. So I really don't understand why you wrote "customers" (using quotation marks).

    Also, it is Conectiva, with just 1 N. Not Connectiva.

    About what I think, is that people should do their homework before posting. Then again, this IS slashdot.

    --
    morcego
  15. Heart attack averted by cianduffy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Looking quickly at this story in my RSS reader, I saw "Microsoft acquires Connectiva"....

  16. Re:Thank you. by morcego · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm sure it is very good for Mandrake, for the reasons already posted by several others here (mostly the brazilian government). And it will come pretty cheap for them, all things considered. If they invested that kind of money in comercial operations in Brazil (marketing, offices etc), they would not be able to get 10% of the market they are getting this way.

    For Conectiva, I'm afraid to guess.

    Conectiva turned into a profitable company mostly by firing employees and closing offices. That is what you get when you have a bank as the major shareholder of a company. Also, a good share of the technical ex-employees left on their own, instead of being fired, and opened their own companies. From that, you can see how much potential market was there. As far as I know, all those companies are profitable (although they are much smaller than Conectiva).

    When RedHat opened their office here in Brazil, it was maned almost entirely by people that have left Conectiva.

    On the other hand, I always considered Conectiva Linux technicaly more advanced than Mandrake.

    So, IMHO, if we can join Conectiva's technical expertise, with Mandrake's comercial expertise, we might end up with a very nice company.

    I have tried contacting a couple of Conectiva founders (board members) since I've heard of this. Got no answer so far, which is probably to be expected.

    --
    morcego
  17. Re:Thank you. by morcego · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Just as an extra note, we don't know where this shares are coming from.

    Are their the shares still held by the original founders, or are they the shares that ABN-Amro Bank held ?

    If their are the shares held by the original founders, one has to guess how many shares of Mandrake are held by ABN, and if this is some kind of twisted move from ABN to get a hold of Mandrake too.

    --
    morcego
  18. Quality of Mandrake Nowadays by Rocko+Bonaparte · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm surprised to hear about this because I, too, thought Mandrake was knocked out. They were going through some financial troubles awhile back--this has already been mentioned. At the time, I was using Mandrake 9.2 and was having a good time of it. Outside of butchering the apache configuration as a learning experience, it's administrative tools took care of everything.

    I guess a distro is only as good as the hard disk it sits on, and I discovered it was on a DeskStar . . . when it died. I put an install of Mandrake 10 on drive it was RMA'd and returned. This didn't seem to be a very mature OS. I couldn't choose what to install, and later found out it didn't include gcc. I installed that only to find it couldn't successfully compile anything! I've since switched to SuSE at home bceause that's what we use at work. While that had its own problems, most of it would have to be blamed on my home CD-burner dying (bad luck lately).

    I hear there's a community edition ISO along with something else. Whatever I got might have been the junkier of the two. Either way, it left a very sour impression. I'm surprised they're still conducting business, but the best of luck to them.

    --
    No I'm not trolling.
    1. Re:Quality of Mandrake Nowadays by Mark_MF-WN · · Score: 3, Informative

      Where've you been? Around that time, most distros were having some growing pains. There have been some major architectural changes in how a Gnu/Linux desktop box works. Mandrake and Fedora, being among the most progressive distros, went through a lot of difficult changes.

  19. Re:What are you talking about ? by KingBahamut · · Score: 2, Informative

    Thats a misconception, not every Linux developed app is Free or Open Sourced. There are many closed liscence/Proprietary Liscenced applications. Dont be so asinine as to make such a broad statement as

    "All software that comes on every distro is free"

    Thats a large idiot speaking. If you ever want to legitimize the business you have to follow certain business level practices to be successful. While open sourcing is good, ultimately in the end, someone has to pay out the cash to support it. Why is RedHat so successful and still able to make money. Otherwise why would they charge you 2500$ for RH Enterprise AS.

    Take your beans, and while your at it, Tell Redhat, Novell, Mandrake, Lycoris, Linare, Libranet, Xandros, and those other Dists that are actually trying to market themselves to make money to take their products off the shelf because its useless to sell something thats free.

    Go home 12yo......come back grasshoppa when you have learned something.

    --
    "God of Rock, thank you for this chance to kick ass. "
  20. Nice merge ... by wagner_bila · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Well, i have Mandrake Community 10.1 installed on my linux box (my notebook) and i always heard good things about Conectiva and its developers. Since i'm also brazilian, i feel very greatful with the fusion ... i think some good products can be build now on with this merge. Also Brazil has a strong movement to the open source software and the open source initiative and also has a great potential to grow too ...

  21. My note on Mandrake Usability.. it 'just works' by hyfe · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I'm posting this from my dell inspirion 8200 laptop running Mandrake 10.1. Mandrake installed advanced power savings, sound, network (including wireless with a little extra work) and graphic card automatically no-hazzle. This is alot better than what the other distroes I've tried have managed. (and yes; I'm one of the funny people who prefer that things 'just work')

    Debian; I never managed to get the ATI drivers to play nice with my card (and this wasn't for lack of trying)

    Fedora didn't want to give me sound, nor did it give my laptop power-savings.

    Suse I never tried, and compiling/Gentoo is out of the question.

    --
    "" How about taking the safety labels off everything, and let the stupidity-problem solve itself? """