Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

IBM to Open Projects at SourceForge.net

Posted by Zonk on from the go-big-blue dept.

cfelde writes "On Friday, IBM said it is contributing some 30 open-source projects to SourceForge.net. IBM also said it is expanding its own developerWorks Web site with more resources including training in PHP and other popular technologies." This probably dovetails with IBM's new full on support of the PHP language.

51 of 179 comments (clear)

  1. Why am I worried.... by DoraLives · · Score: 4, Interesting
    that this will all turn out horribly wrong in the end? Am I just alergic to large corporations in general?

    Is my tinfoil hat on too tight?

    --
    Is it fascism yet?
    1. Re:Why am I worried.... by javaxman · · Score: 5, Insightful
      that this will all turn out horribly wrong in the end? Am I just alergic to large corporations in general? Is my tinfoil hat on too tight?

      It's really hard to fault you, actually. History is hard to forget, and it's not unreasonable to wonder if a company can really change it's culture and philosophy so radically.

      On the other hand, if someone is giving you a bunch of cool stuff ( i.e. source code ), and doing so under terms ( i.e. license ) that are acceptable to you... it's generally a good thing. I'm not seeing the downside, at least for OSS developers. The downside could be there, of course... but I can't easily think of what it could be.

      The upside for IBM, on the other hand, is pretty obvious... it's not like they've done this entirely without thinking of their own benefit. Maybe thinking of it that way will make you feel better? It's not so much that IBM has radically changed ( though it has ), it's that they've figured out how to leverage open source development ?

    2. Re:Why am I worried.... by HawkingMattress · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe it's too tight. I mean, since IBM started to embrace free software, they haven't done a bad move. On the contrary, they make very intelligent moves. Of course we all know that their purpose is not to make the world better, whatever that means. But it seems that for now the people taking decisions concerning free software at IBM are always trying to do things the right way.
      I mean, when you think about it, does IBM really care if project X'sources, funded by them, are downloadable by everybody ? Oponents have their own solutions anyway, and are too intrically tied to it. Corporations are happy because they have IBM behind the project, and will buy IBM's support on a particular project if they need it. Plus, they know the code is really free. I think this is a big plus in a lot of smaller shops, who were typically afraid of IBM's known habit to gradually dig his customers into closed solutions.
      And on top of that, IBM knows that if it plays the game well, free software developpers will help them, and push them into their own shops. So it's really a win-win situation for everybody, and they have no interest in cheating. Transparency is the key in this game, and they know it.

    3. Re:Why am I worried.... by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is not the terrace at a football game, Microsoft is not the enemy. They are merely a competitor to a fraction of OSS projects.

      Open source software lives and thrives within a Windows environment. Given any of the common OS's, I can download and install legal software without paying a penny more. It doesn't matter if I am using a Mac or an x86 or something else, software is available.

      If you want the Linux OS to suceed however, you have to convince Dell and HP and Time and Tiny that the OS on their machines is stable and can be supported. I do not know a single home user who has purchased or changed their operating system for a machine they have bought. They will put up with whatever is there until its hardware renewal time.

      I couldn't care less what OS people use, as long as they have choice. Its in our own best interests though to push and market OSS principles and benefits to the rest of the world.

      IBM and Novell have backed a winner in Linux, and with such big names standing behind it, it wont be long before others follow :)

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    4. Re:Why am I worried.... by extra+the+woos · · Score: 2, Insightful

      shit! If a company figures out how to benefit people AND increase their profits, marketshare, and mindshare, then that is GREAT imho!!! That's the way it should be! Do good things and get rewarded. You can take an easier path (not gonna say omg ms is evil or anything, though obviously look at their past, and look at ibm in the 80's, look at sco etc) of taking the approach of exploiting people and excluding others for the sake of locking people in for profit.

      Ibm is behaving great, and I'll support them. My mom bought a thinkpad, if I buy a laptop it'll be a thinkpad, if my friends ask for something portable (not a desktop replacement laptop but a portable one)... they will get sent to ibm... now, if IBM changes their behavior, I can too. Until then (if ever), they get my support. Simple and fair.

      --
      replacing it with NEW Folger's Crystals! (lets see if they notice the difference)
    5. Re:Why am I worried.... by mickwd · · Score: 3, Insightful

      All corporations want it money.

      Lots and lots and lots of money.

      But that's it. Nothing else.

      If they think the best way to make money is by screwing their customers over, then many of them will do it.

      But if a large corporation thinks it can make more money using a different approach, it will.

      Free and open source software is the biggest movement in the software industry today, and is likely to be so for a long time. IBM is riding the wave, so to speak, but is smart enough to realise it's got to give a little as well as take. And it can still make lots of money doing so.

      It's also in its interest to support a movement in which many people (but not all) have a strong dislike of several of their major competitors: Microsoft (deservedly so, I would say), Sun (a little harshly, in my opinion) and, increasingly it would seem, HP.

    6. Re:Why am I worried.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're probably thinking everybody donates to opensource for altruistic reasons, so a donation from IBM is suspicious. But these days, there are solid economic reasons to donate to opensource. If you have software that benefits you, but which is not a moneymaking product or a real competitive advantage, then it only makes sense to opensource it. You can get other people helping you develop it, and reduce your costs. What's not to like?

    7. Re:Why am I worried.... by greyhoundpoe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You know, I get kind of bothered by the ub3rcynicism about corporations sometimes. It's not that corporations can't get away with exploitation--they do. It's not that there aren't people who put their personal wealth above all other concerns--there are.

      But when we rant about how corporations are fundamentally evil and never going to change, all we're doing is accepting it. Corporations aren't bloated, undead beast-things that exist off of the souls of the living (well, except EA). They're organizations of people, and the ideals a corporation's leadership pushes are the ideals that corporation follows. We shouldn't be pushing selfless, dedicated people away from corporations and into the Peace Corps or god knows what else--we should be encouraging them to enter the corporate world and make changes. If you say that business is a career choice only for the selfish, manipulative and cruel, all you're doing is criticizing, demeaning and discouraging the people that do business who aren't any of those things.

      Maybe I'm too idealistic, but I see a fundamentally healthy business as one that's profitable because it treats its customers well and fulfills a need customers have better than it had been fulfilled before. I see a corporation existing in any other state as unhealthy. And fine, a lot of corporate America is unhealthy. I'm not arguing that. But when did we start accepting that as a given?

    8. Re:Why am I worried.... by HiThere · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Managements do, however, change. So do corporate policies. One needs to be certain to never trust a corporation so much that one becomes dependent on it, because it may change out from under you.

      I can quite accept that IBM of the current decade has "good" motives. This helps me project the motives of the IBM of 10-15 years from now. But it's no certain guide.

      I put more faith in the GPL...and even there I'm not certain. One never knows what some legislature may decide, or some court.

      For this reason I support having a variety of Free Software licenses used, and housing the sources in a variety of countries. There is no certain protection, but minimizing the breaking points is as big a help as carefully designing each one. Grass is more successful than are Sequoia trees. (OTOH, the Dutch Elm is no more. Linkages can be dangerous.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  2. Amazing by Rei · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's amazing how well IBM has been transforming itself from the universally-recognized Bad Guy(tm) to a geek's best friend ;) Back in the day, IBM was the Evil Empire of the computer world.

    --
    Don't take a knife to a gunfight, or even a knife to a knife fight. Take a gun to a knife fight.
    1. Re:Amazing by Lisandro · · Score: 4, Insightful

      IBM is just protecting their interests. They beleive (like most people here) that most software will become a comodity in the near future, and instead of fighting it they roll along. I happen to beleive it's wise, but's quite a bold move.

      Anyway, yes, it is weird. Not to long ago IBM was as hatred as Microsoft is now...

    2. Re:Amazing by someguy456 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      It's amazing how well IBM has been transforming itself from the universally-recognized Bad Guy(tm) to a geek's best friend ;) Back in the day, IBM was the Evil Empire of the computer world.

      If IBM was able to turn around from the "Bad Guy(tm)" to a geek's best friend, I think there is a possibility that many years from now, today's Evil Empire, Microsoft, might become a geek's best friend while, oh, let's say Google became the new "Bad Guy(tm)

      May God help us all...
      --
      Robert Bindler
      A Computer Science student's views on technology.
    3. Re:Amazing by Cyno · · Score: 2, Insightful

      IBM was the Evil Empire of the computer world.

      Today its Microsoft. But how many people love them for it? How many people would switch to a different OS because they believe monopolies are bad? Calling these corporations Evil Empires does nothing to help the ignorant consumer.

      If Microsoft released their source code under the GPL they would also be a geek's best friend. Because geeks like me believe actions speak louder than words. As long as nobody seems to care about the threat a large corporation poses to their economy, geeks usually don't mind their support. Its like Republicans. As long as nobody wants to kick them out of office I'm willing to accept that $300 tax refund in exchange for my liberty. But I know what I am giving up.

      Unlike all the ignorant masses, us geeks will be watching and judging.

      So, uh, who ya gonna call Evil next? :)

    4. Re:Amazing by stevesliva · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No, IBM thinks CPU time will be the commodity and services will the the cash cow. Stable, reliable open software will be the grease, the public good.

      --
      Who do you get to be an expert to tell you something's not obvious? The least insightful person you can find? -J Roberts
    5. Re:Amazing by sconeu · · Score: 4, Insightful

      IBM, while dominating and monopolistic in its day, did have a reputation for quality and topnotch research.

      Yes, there is MS Research but it's in no way comparable to IBM Research.

      And don't even mention MS and "quality" in the same breath unless the words "lack of" are placed between them.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    6. Re:Amazing by extra+the+woos · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Unlike just about everyone else, MS can't adopt open source since it kills the only way they've figured out how to make money: charge top dollar for commodity software." I'm not saying your whole post is wrong or anything. But this part is wrong. Look at where MS is going. The last several years they have been moving away from depending on software. They have started realizing what is about to happen, and they are moving to a position where they will provide the hardware you want to have to exit in the digital age. One word: x-box. I believe this is MS diversifying because they know they need something more than windows and office.

      --
      replacing it with NEW Folger's Crystals! (lets see if they notice the difference)
    7. Re:Amazing by loconet · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Yes, there is MS Research but it's in no way comparable to IBM Research."

      No kidding, specially when you have research like this at IBM:

      "Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Quantum Computing"

      vs Research like this at MS:


      "Turn Your Photos into Movies
      Researchers from the lab in Beijing have developed a system that can take your still photographs and automatically convert them into motion."

      --
      [alk]
  3. IBM's rhype also now open source by Xpilot · · Score: 4, Informative

    On a somewhat related note, IBM has released rhype, it's research hypervisor as open source under the GPL. This should spice up the free hypervisor community. First Xen, now IBM's rhype. Choice is so good :)

    --
    "Backups are for wimps. Real men upload their data to an FTP site and have everyone else mirror it." -- Linus Torvalds
    1. Re:IBM's rhype also now open source by TheSync · · Score: 2, Funny

      It "hypes up" your work.

      Suddenly, your "hello world" CGI script is a "highly virtualized, service-oriented architecture, scalable to grid computing."

    2. Re:IBM's rhype also now open source by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 2, Informative

      It manages system virtualization. Sits between the OS and the iron, and can host several OSs simultaneously. This is a big, important feature of IBM's products.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
  4. Wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    do we like IBM this week?

    1. Re:Wait... by Spoing · · Score: 2, Interesting
      1. do we like IBM this week?

      IBM was a rat bastard company ready to meet it's ultimate demise around 1990. Nobody trusted or liked them...except for the fact that IBM was huge.

      Then, early in the 90s the stock crashed to about 1/3 of it's 1980s price. And stayed there. That woke the shareholders up who decided that the IBM institution had to be obliterated if anything of the share value could be saved.

      Since then, they have gone through multiple reforms. Early on, many of those changes did not improve profits at all. In some ways they became weaker.

      Yet...over the last 8 years...I would put IBM in the 'mostly good' category because they decided not to be rat bastards anymore and to do less dammage and more good. A side benifit to this change is that they regained stock value and they didn't end up getting sold for the IBM name alone.

      Nobody likes a jerk or a bully -- and it doesn't help the bully very long either. Eventually all bullies either loose friends and increase the bullying (and payoffs and threats) or become nice and benifits from the mutual friendship. That's one of the reasons why a dictatorship is efficient only for a small set of goals that the dictator has while being very wasteful for other goals of society.

      IBM like a reformed bully who doesn't want to go back to the old days. There are benifits of not clubbing other kids for lunch money and instead bringing extra gum to share.

      The IBM of today does not compete with IBM's customers and is not making plans to grow into IBM's customer's spaces. That's one of the main reasons nobody feels threatened by IBM.

      --
      A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
  5. So what are these apps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Thirty hello world programs in COBOL?

  6. IBM And MONEY by Indes · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They have it, why not create a sourceforge like site for their own projects instead of using the good will of other open source companies?

    or do they plan to donate some money to it to help it all as a whole??

    IBM is in an odd situation no doubt, but using OpenSource public tools when properly funded seems somewhat.. rude, no?

    1. Re:IBM And MONEY by Stradenko · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm happy to let IBM put its shit in our community wheelbarrow. More shit for everyone can only be good.

    2. Re:IBM And MONEY by Aspirator · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Sourceforge is the acknowledged place these things
      are coordinated, It is great to see a giant like
      IBM contributing in the 'commoners' forum.

      > but using OpenSource public tools when
      > properly funded seems somewhat.. rude, no?

      Rude? NO. It is a very good thing.
      It is a testament to how good some of the Open Source tools have become.

    3. Re:IBM And MONEY by kiore · · Score: 3, Informative

      Putting the source code in a repository they neither own nor control makes me feel more comfortable that they are sincere.

      Given IBM's recent history, it didn't surprise me to hear that they are a cash contributor to Sourceforge. The "site sponsors" block on the left of the Sourceforge homepage contains at least one link to an IBM site. I clicked the DB2 link to see where it went ... www14.software.ibm.com

  7. Good news for PHP... by bc90021 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...and I'm glad it was included in this story, since I hadn't seen the prior one.

    While a lot of people like to knock PHP (mostly Java guys, but hey ;) ), I love it. It's easy, functional, and lately, a lot more mature with the OO aspects. (I have one class now that I use for database access, and it makes life so much easier.)

    With things like PHP-GTK, you can even use it to write applications, and with IBM behind it, things will likely only improve.

    --
    libertarianswag.com
    1. Re:Good news for PHP... by harborpirate · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Languages are a tool - and each tool has its own use. You shouldn't use a screwdriver to pound a nail, as it were. Because even though you might get it to work, you're putting more effort into it than you really need to.

      To me, PHP is great for small, agile projects - ones that need to be designed and written quickly, and require a lot of changes to the code to happen throughout implementation.

      I think OO PHP isn't all bad - being able to compartmentalize your code for reuse and complexity reduction is great.

      My concern, however, is that people will start to look at PHP as an enterprise level language, which in my opinion, it isn't. Every PHP project that I've worked on started to break down after a certain level of complexity. I think part of this was due to the lack of Object Orientation, but I think part of it was also the nature of the language itself. I'll be interested to see what IBM can do with PHP, but lets just say I don't envy their guys if they're trying to switch their enterprise level development to use it.

      --
      // harborpirate
      // Slashbots off the starboard bow!
    2. Re:Good news for PHP... by teknomage1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I' pretty sure people knock it because it's easy. Some people feel intimidated by things being made easier for the masses because they're afraid of being obsolete. A rather prominent greek philosopher came out against paper because he felt it'd be the downfall of society. Young people wouldn't bother to memorize things anymore and so and so forth. Many people attack PHP as a language that let's bad programmers make websites, so clearly they're talking about the downfall of programming civilization. Now php does have some syntax issues, but hopefully those'll get worked out before too long. I still think it makes a great first language for people to discover programming with.

      --
      Stop intellectual property from infringing on me
    3. Re:Good news for PHP... by tijnbraun · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It think it is moslty due to the nature of the language.

      If a project gets complex, and you don't have a compiler to check your code before it runs, refactoring gets really difficult. You can still do some sort of unit testing. But the combination of unit testing and strong type language is much more powerfull.

      If refactoring gets difficult and adjustments have to be implimented due to requirement changes, bugs will start to appear. And they will only rear their heads once the code is executed.

      A class might still pass the unit test but without interface checking of a compiler you are never certain that other code using that class will not fail.

      I could be doing something wrong but often when I have to change code in php I use grep to check whether other code is using that function etc.

  8. List of the Projects? by D4rk+Fx · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Does anyone have a list of all thr projects IBM is helping? TFA didn't seem to have all of them, only a couple

    1. Re:List of the Projects? by UTF-8 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I don't know all of them, but one of the projects that was moved was http://icu.sourceforge.net/

      IBM has been very involved with open source for many years, and now they are moving the hosting of many projects to other sites. One of them is to sourceforge. The donation was more of a move from DeveloperWorks to Sourceforge because of the increasing costs (bureaucracy) to maintain many projects on ibm.com.

      ICU (International Components for Unicode) has been on DeveloperWorks and AlphaWorks as open source since 1999.

  9. which 30 projects? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    are they 30 projects that IBM is interested in or 30 projects that they were planning to abandon but felt they could get some goodwill outof instead?

    1. Re:which 30 projects? by MicroBerto · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Everyone wants to know which projects, and we'll find out soon enough.

      However, I don't like the attitude in the above post. In the grand scheme of things, 30 projects is NOTHING, and it doesn't matter what they do. What matters is if collaboration and support rise and IBM likes the results that they get, they will do it MORE.

      So quit griping - any support is good, and if the community supports it in return, you've made a good ally and have a good future.

      --
      Berto
  10. The Why by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Insightful
    IBM Software is turning up the noise on its open-source contributions.

    What it's about:

    An interesting bit on the transition and recovery of IBM was on the BBC a couple days back, refreshing and adding a layer of information to my memory of experience with the behemoth IT company. IBM's core business is selling service, not hardware (they sold the PC unit to Lenovo) and big iron doesn't sell much anymore, so they've come to the point of making some hardware, but throwing their weight behind systems and services. Why so much given to Open Source? IBM is more than just friendly to Linux and Open Source, but see them as their life blood. They won't make money pushing systems built around Microsoft Windows, because that leaves too much leverage in an external (and sometimes unfriendly) camp. Not to overlook the taint associated over the past few years with gaping security holes in Microsoft products, which could reflect very negatively on IBM having to go in and clean up the mess. A couple years ago IBM had already broken the 1G$ barrier on Linux systems, in one quarter. I haven't looked at their company statements lately, but it's clear this is their planned direction of growth.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  11. Large Corporations and Criticism by sameerdesai · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's amazing how we criticise M$ for not being open and IBM for tring to be open.

    1. Re:Large Corporations and Criticism by sporty · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No it's not. People are more likely to complain about small discomforts than praise small acomplishments. The scales tip to criticizing.

      --

      -
      ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

  12. You can't have it both ways. by winkydink · · Score: 5, Insightful
    People gripe when big, evil corporations develop proprietary code and then when these corporations open it up, they gripe that there must be a hidden agenda.

    I think some folks just like to gripe.

    Opening this code will dovetail nicely with IBM becoming more of a services-focused company. When BigCo wants a project implemented & maintained using open source, IBM will be there to lend a hand (for a price of course).

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    1. Re:You can't have it both ways. by torinth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      People gripe when big, evil corporations develop proprietary code and then when these corporations open it up, they gripe that there must be a hidden agenda.

      I think some folks just like to gripe.

      Or else maybe there's more than one 'people' out there. But whatever, gripe away.

  13. This is a good move, by robyannetta · · Score: 5, Interesting
    As we learned in The Art of War by Sun Tzu, to win the war, make as many allies as possible.

    IBM learned early on that if you have the Linux community backing a multi-billion dollar corporate entity like themselves, they stand a helluva good chance toppling that Redmond, Washington company they don't like.

    They have my vote.

    --
    - Just my $0.02, take with a grain of salt, your mileage may vary.
  14. A great saying.. by Roliverio · · Score: 2, Funny

    The enemy of my enemy, it's my friend :-D

  15. OS/2 ??!! by BitwiseX · · Score: 3, Funny

    God I hope they put the source code for OS/2 up.. I could use a good laugh. ;)

  16. Then again... by Ulric · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Microsoft Contributes To Open Source Site

  17. What projects? by HogGeek · · Score: 2, Informative
    I tried doing a search for both people and project that contain IBM, but nothing solid.

    Is there a list of software that they donated? I'm curious if its "newer" stuff, of old stuff they no longer user, nor implement themselves...

  18. CVS Status by YodaToo · · Score: 2, Informative

    Unfortunately all of their projects will show zero files committed until they get this Nov. 2003 issue fixed.

    --
    This way to the egress...
  19. PHP... by einhverfr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I program in Perl, Python, and PHP. And I work on large (30k line) programs in both Perl and PHP.

    PHP is a good language for certain classes of applications including web applications in general. But additionally, you can preprocess any text-based file with it too. This means:

    1) Preprocessing configuration files is easy
    2) Web apps are easy to build in PHP
    3) PHP has a number of features that place it *way* ahead of Microsoft's ASP for enterprise applications. Variable-based includes for example.

    That being said, trying to write system administration scripts in PHP is like using a crescent wrench as a hammer. It might sorta work but it is neither elegant nor optimal. Perl and python are much better at this.

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
  20. Re:I wish there was RHP instead of PHP by gregarican · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There is this. I am a Ruby convert as well. I think it's so much cleaner than other scripting languages. Most of it "just makes sense." I personally am not using it not so much as a web app framework as a replacement for my company's plethora of ASP work. Using eRuby on Apache I hope to keep things moving along...

  21. What about the cloudscape contest? by stm2 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This may seems OT, I am not sure. But IBM sponsored a contest in Sourceforge (with iPODs as prices). It was supposed to announce winners Feb 18 but I still don know what happened. My JAVA-fu were good according to IBM, but I still didn got any notification about who won.
    BTW, I didn need to code JAVA at all, just use a IBM tutorial-game as example and soved without programing :)

    --
    DNA in your Linux: DNALinux
  22. Re:I'm presuming Performance Explorer is one of th by saugart · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm at IBM Watson, down the hall from one of the Performance Explorer (PE) guys, and I just went up to ask about it. PE did indeed go over, and it's licensed under the IBM CPL, which is very similar to the Apache Public License (APL). The CPL isn't just "generally an open-source license," it's been certified as one by the OSDI. One of the authors of PE is a graduate student, and he's been pretty busy with his own life right now. It probably won't make it out at the end of this month. We're nudging the authors, anyway. They just want to get the code into better shape for release. PE is a sub-project of Jikes RVM, a free VM for Java project I develop on, and it's at http://jikesrvm.sourceforge.net . I'm sorry to say that, right now, the PE directory in our CVS repository is just a placeholder.

  23. List of projects by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 4, Informative

    AIX Toolbox - http://sf.net/projects/aixtoolbox/

    Bluetooth ad-hoc network simulator - http://sf.net/projects/bluehoc/

    Dynamic Probe Class Library - http://sf.net/projects/dpcl/

    Journaled File System - http://sf.net/projects/jfs/

    IBM Jikes Compiler for the Java Language - http://sf.net/projects/jikes/

    Jikes RVM - http://sf.net/projects/jikesrvm/

    Java POS Config Loader - http://sf.net/projects/jposloader/

    Toolbox for Java/JTOpen - http://sf.net/projects/jt400/

    openCryptoki - http://sf.net/projects/opencryptoki/

    LTC Linux Kernel Performance Project - http://sf.net/projects/linuxperf/

    LSID (Life Science Identifier) - http://sf.net/projects/lsid/

    Memory Expansion Technology - http://sf.net/projects/mxt/

    OpenSSH on AIX - http://sf.net/projects/openssh-aix/

    Standards Based Linux Instrumentation - http://sf.net/projects/sblim/

    UDDI4J Java Class Library - http://sf.net/projects/uddi4j/

    Web Services Description Language for Java -
    http://sf.net/projects/wsdl4j/

    ACP Modem (Mwave) Driver for Linux - http://sf.net/projects/acpmodem/

    International Components for Unicode - http://sf.net/projects/icu/

    Dynamic Probes - http://sf.net/projects/dprobes/

    TCL extension library for IBM Speech Manager Applications Programming
    Interface (SMAPI) - http://sf.net/projects/tclsmapi/

    TCK for JWSDL ( JWSDLTCK ) - http://sf.net/projects/jwsdltck/

    (from the SourceForge post on that @ http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?forum_id=44 9291)