Slashdot Mirror


TiVo vs Microsoft vs HDTV Cable

Thomas Hawk writes "Technology writer Ed Bott is out today with a great comparison piece where he compares the various feature sets of his TiVo, his Microsoft Media Center PC and his current HDTV cable DVR. It seems like all three have various nice features but all three also have negatives that you have to suffer through. A great read and strong comparison piece for anyone interested in DVR technology. Would love to see Ed or someone else expand on this piece and incorporate the current HDTV DirecTV TiVo, Comcast's Foundation box being rolled out in a pilot program in Washington State and MythTV."

47 of 293 comments (clear)

  1. I still prefer to pay TiVo. by garcia · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Smart offers. If you bail out of watching a recorded show within a few minutes of the end, TiVo asks if you want to delete the recording to free up hard drive space. That's smart; it's assuming that since you're near the end, you've probably watched all you intend to watch. (If you cancel playback in the middle or beginning, though, TiVo doesn't bother you with that offer; it assumes you're not finished with the show yet.)

    I don't know if they were talking negatively about the lack of an option to delete if you bail out in the middle of playback or not but, honestly, it's not difficult to delete any recording from the main menu... For most of the shows I watch I have them setup to delete when space is needed. The shows that I absolutely MUST watch get watched or marked later with "do not delete until I say".

    I would actually find it relatively annoying if I jumped out of playback in the middle of a show and it asked if I wanted to delete. That's an unnecessary step that I'd have to take.

    That's my opinion though, YMMV, perhaps a more detailed configuration of these settings would help TiVo? "Do you want to be prompted to delete if aborting playback before the end?" (something less wordy but you get the idea).

    Bottom line? Feature for feature, Windows XP Media Center Edition matches TiVo and even exceeds it in some measures.

    Bottom line? You need to have a dedicated machine for the MCE and a TV in/out card plus you need something that's half-decent in speed. TiVo just works and it was cheap (for me). You also need to support Microsoft and personally, as much as I am not terribly happy w/TiVo's recent decisions, I'd prefer to pay them than MSFT.

    1. Re:I still prefer to pay TiVo. by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm surprised that with a pretty significant market share, the reviewer didn't bother to mention the offerings from DishNetwork.

      Generally, the main differences between the Dishnetwork 921/942 HD DVRs and the HD Tivo models is that the Tivo has better auto-recording features for picking stuff you want to set a timer for, while the Dish DVRs are much, much faster to use in terms of the program guide, etc...

      What it really comes down to for most people is the exact HD content they can get from cable/Direc/Dish, etc... All the features in the world are useless without something to watch in HD.

      I'm to the point where I rarely even look at non-HD channels in the channel guide, let alone want to watch them. On a 100" screen, it's just too painful to watch SD most of the time.

      --
      The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
    2. Re:I still prefer to pay TiVo. by Hittman · · Score: 3, Informative

      Two years ago I wrote a review comparing my Tivo to the Time Warner's Scientific Atlanta DVR. After three weeks I told TW to remove it immediately. I was amazed that anyone could fit that much suck into such a small box.

      Looks like things haven't changed much since then.

    3. Re:I still prefer to pay TiVo. by Gondola · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "I'm to the point where I rarely even look at non-HD channels in the channel guide, let alone want to watch them. On a 100" screen, it's just too painful to watch SD most of the time."

      I can sympathize heartily with this sentiment. I have a 65" HDTV and SD format is just "tolerable", especially with the horrible quality of some of the SD shows on TWC cable. (Sci Fi channel is ugly, and the new Battlestar Galactica is the only show I record in SD.)

      I loved my TiVo, but it doesn't do HDTV. Hello, Scientific Atlanta 8000HD (Time Warner cable). It's a poor alternative to the TiVo interface, but it does HD. It's worth suffering through the poor interface for that, and it does HD recordings very well usually. I've already had to replace it once because of a failed hard drive (free, same-day replacement via TWC buttcrack thanks to someone else's cancellation). Plus it has two tuners, which has come in handy at times.

      If an HD TiVo (standalone, not satellite) came out (yes I'm aware there was a demo unit, but no official announcement), I would look at it very hard before buying, however. The cost would be high for those 1st gen boxes.

    4. Re:I still prefer to pay TiVo. by settsu · · Score: 2, Funny

      Display pics? Doable (but why?)

      Classic.

      For the sake of those of you who nodded in agreement with that question: They're called "Friends." They're these other people who come over--often in groups withOUT LAN party cases in their arms--to socialize with you IN YOUR HOME (not it your garage basement) (!).

  2. An idea... by NEOtaku17 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Myth TV anyone?

    1. Re:An idea... by wizbit · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not necessarily. Myth 0.17 allows the firewire-enabled cable boxes with HD channels to be controlled from the PC (so it can change the channel when you do a channel-up/channel-down or start recording). The video can theoretically go both ways over that firewire connection too, but the way I understand it you'd use an S-Video or composite-out cable to your PVR (and back to the TV) to see the on-screen display on your TV and just use the FW link to change channels automatically.

      Now they could still encrypt those channels over the FW-out, but early reports on the mailing list say most providers haven't done that yet.

    2. Re:An idea... by wizbit · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm sorry, apparently I'm on crack today. You don't capture via S-video/Composite because the signal's HD, so that's no help. Video will definitely come down the FW pipe, though; that may be how the devs are doing it. Fun for another day, I suppose...

    3. Re:An idea... by iowannaski · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As very poor former TiVo user and current Myth user, I can't say that I recommend doling out the cash for a dedicated Myth system, but I have been able to turn my two piece-of-shit machines into a functioning myth system. The backend is an hp 1GHz P3 machine with an el cheapo Pinnacle capture card ($80 at CompUSA in 2002) running FC3. This machine became a linux box a little more than a month ago when my win2k install ate its own registry and I couldn't scrounge up a copy of a wndows OS to reinstall. The frontend is a gateway 400Mhz PII running KnoppMyth that I bpught from a friend for $80 a cuouple years ago. I recently replaced the original 2GB harddrive with a 40 gig scavenged from an unused DirecTivo. Anyhow, the system is great, cheap (for me), and I was able to get it all running an incompetent n00b.

      --
      i forget
  3. How Tivo can win... by radiumhahn · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I honestly believe that if Tivo wants to win they should allow shell access to the box and release development APIs so people can write their own Tivo applications. This will allow third party companies to create and support Tivo solutions and would bring popularity back to the device. If you hack a cable box you get a visit from the FBI. Microsoft will never be open. This is where Tivo can win. Hopefully they wake up and sieze the opportunity.

    1. Re:How Tivo can win... by joecm · · Score: 5, Informative
      They are opening up the API to developers:

      http://www.tivo.com/4.3.hme.asp

    2. Re:How Tivo can win... by radiumhahn · · Score: 2, Informative
      No they are not.

      HME applications run on home PCís or remote servers hosted by TiVo. At this time, HME applications cannot control any of the TiVo DVRís scheduling, recording, or video playback capabilities.

    3. Re:How Tivo can win... by riptide_dot · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I honestly believe that if Tivo wants to win they should allow shell access to the box and release development APIs so people can write their own Tivo applications.

      I couldn't agree more. To add to that idea, one of the main reasons that I "hacked" my DirecTivo was because I needed to implement features in it that weren't at all available in the OOTB unit (specifically the network interface and a webserver).

      Here's a pretty specific example of why it was good for me to be able to modify this device: I have an entertainment center with doors on it that are completely opaque (meaning that if the doors are closed I can't get IR to the components behind them). So, instead of modifying the layout of my media center, I wrote a script that will allow me to change the channel on the Tivo (and actually do just about everything the remote can do) using a web interface on my computer (which has its IR receiver extended into the outside of the entertainment center). The computer's remote and accompanying software can then translate its commands into web scripts that are then in turn fed directly to my hacked Tivo via its webserver. There is no way I could have done any of this on an OOTB unit.

      I suppose I could have done this with a third-party IR repeater, but this was more fun, and more importantly, FREE.

      I suggest that Tivo, MS, and other DVR manufacturers could still market their "closed" versions for the masses of people who are willing to sacrifice feature sets for simplicity, but they should also offer more powerful units to those that want to purchase them, maybe provided that the "power" units have less of a support expectation...

      --
      I was in the park the other day wondering why frisbees get bigger and bigger the closer they get - and then it hit me.
  4. "introducing-the-challangers dept."? by josh2112 · · Score: 5, Funny

    From the somabody-neads-to-chack-thair-spalling dept.

  5. I prefer my ReplayTV to my old Media Center PCs by iibbmm · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I have owned two Media Center PCs, and currently use two 5504 ReplayTV's as my main PVR units.

    The Media Center PCs were of course the most powerfull units, but they had problems. It was a real pain to get everything working with my Toshiba HD set, as it was finicky about resolutions, and getting everything stable was a pain. I ended up selling both of my attempts at Media Pcs, and got a replay tv.

    The replay is PERFECT. Everyone in the house can use it without issue, and everything is fluid. There is no need to spend hour after hour customizing and tweaking software to get everything work with something else, no crashes, nothing out of the ordinary.

    The key components I miss from the HTPCs are the music playback, web browsing, and gaming on the big screen. However, I have a wireless media streamer that I use for music, and I prefer to play games in my office anyway, so the loss of functionality is minimal. I didn't use my HTPC to play pirated films, as I can't stand the look of divx/xvid at 57".

    1. Re:I prefer my ReplayTV to my old Media Center PCs by nontrivial · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hell yes, I love my ReplayTV. I have played with a Tivo, and I ended up buying a ReplayTV. The ReplayTV is not as flexible as the Tivo, but it is much easier to use. Plus, it seems all the addon software is easier to use to. I currently offload some content automatically every night to my desktop computer, sort through it on the desktop, and then view any content from any computer or ReplayTV in my house. All this with no hacking or tweaking at all, just installing one program on the computers. The picture slideshows are nice, but some sort of music playing would be nice.

      --
      http://james.nontrivial.org
  6. Tivo vs comcast by FerretFrottage · · Score: 4, Informative

    I have a standalone tivo with tivo2go software and it is pretty neat. I really like the tivo interface, season passes....all works well. As I moved and dropped directv, I added comcast cable since they are also my ISP. I got a promotion for htdv and their new Motorola 6412 DVR. That box does record HD and supports dual recording via single coax cable connection. But the user interface and other tivo like features are not near as nice, plus the box seems to freeze up every so often (even when not recording). The thing that makes me appreciate my tivo is that I haven't seen tivo prevent me from recording or fast forwarding through a show. There are reports that comcast is doing just that, although I have not experienced it for myself.

    --
    "Look Lois, the two symbols of the Republican Party: an elephant, and a fat white guy who is threatened by change."
  7. Motorola 6xxx HDDVR is best by hackstraw · · Score: 4, Informative


    I've got one of these, and it does everything that the article mentions lacking in the products he used. I'm not sure if it goes weeks into the future with the guide, I've never tried. Oh, one thing it does not have is 30sec skip, but it has 3 or 4 levels of fast forward, and it accounts for human reaction time when hitting play. I always get exactly to the end of a commercial break, sometimes I get the last 5 or 10 secs of the commercial.

    It has all of the Season Pass features of a Tivo, and all in all its a great device, plus its HD. Oh, it also has two tuners so I can watch and record a show at the same time. The equivalent media PC would cost much more than I pay for this device, and not be as good. A Tivo is close, but no HD. I was pleasantly surprised with this device.

  8. "DVR technology" -1 Overrated by GillBates0 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    A great read and strong comparison piece for anyone interested in DVR technology. Would love to see Ed or someone else expand on this piece and incorporate the current HDTV DirecTV TiVo, Comcast's Foundation box being rolled out in a pilot program in Washington State and MythTV.

    I think "DVR Technology" is overrated...atleast to anyone who has a TV Tuner Card in the PC and a decent set of drivers and TV Tuner software (Hauppauge's WinTV for xawtv/bttv for Linux). I got a basic one for $20.00 and it does the job satisfactorily. If I'd more dough, I could've bought a higher end one for $60.00, with it's own remote control.

    I have 180Gb of diskspace at my disposal, the ability to skip, timeshift, record, picture-in-picture, channel scan etc that most TiVo users gloat about, with the performance being limited only by my CPU/Graphics/RAM, all of which I'd rather update than buy a new TiVo/DVR device. And to those who hate watching TV on their monitor...that's where an S-Video cable comes in.

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
    1. Re:"DVR technology" -1 Overrated by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's better because it's built to be a PVR, and that's all it does.

      As per my previous post, I disagree. I think it is worse because that's all it does. My computer with a tuner gives me options and features a Tivo never will. MP3 storage, easy upgrades, DVD and VCD playing and burning, games, etc. etc. Also, there is no monthly fee. My girlfriend figured out how to record shows, burn DVDs of those shows, watch shows (including fast forward, rewind, skip, pause, etc.), delete shows, search listings, and permanently edit out commercials on recorded shows without ever touching a manual or asking for help. It's not like it is rocket science. There are a few things that are more slick about TiVo's interface, but it is limited to those few features. My setup can do a great deal more, simply and easily. It is running on OS X with a few useful applications in the dock, and that is it. Is it more complex than a Tivo or ReplayTV? Yes. It is also more functional, and easy enough for the average person to figure out in about 5 minutes.

    2. Re:"DVR technology" -1 Overrated by athakur999 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The inability to decode DirecTV on a PC is the big killer for me as well. DirecTivos record the compressed signal from the satellite directly and then decode it when you watch it. Any standalone solution would have to decode the satellite signal via the satellite receiver box then reencode it for storage. You either have to reencode at a reasonable bitrate and deal with more artifacts from transcoding or encode at a really high bitrate to preserve as much of the (already lossily encoded) signal as possible.

      --
      "People that quote themselves in their signatures bother me" - athakur999
  9. Re:Can you really FFWD commercials? by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've always heard that TiVo can fast forward through adverts, but I don't see how - unless you pre-record everything.

    That is pretty much what you do. I don't have a Tivo. I use another PVR. I don't have time to watch the shows I schedule it to record, let alone something else that is on. If I do, however, I just tune in 10-20 minutes after the show starts and watch it from the buffer. I start at the beginning, skip all the commercials, and it ends the same time as it normally would.

  10. Microsoft vs Tivo by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 4, Informative

    Microsoft owns a big chunk of Comcast.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  11. That's spelled "geeks" by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The 1% of us who are geeks, who create an app against the TiVo API, then share those apps with the other 99%. That's how software is developed, used, and makes platforms popular. Programming isn't for everyone, but programs are.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  12. Re:Can you really FFWD commercials? by Ron+Harwood · · Score: 2, Informative

    You either have to be watching something already recorded - or start watching something a few minutes after it's already started (rewind to the start of show... and ffwd through commercials)...

  13. Re:OT- Is there Video surveillance SW for Linux? by Pygmy+Marmoset · · Score: 2, Informative

    Zoneminder is great, it even has a live CD so you can find out how your hardware will work without having to find a drive to install it on.

    I've been using it for about a year and am very happy with it.

  14. ReplayTV by omahajim · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Does no one like ReplayTV anymore? I see only one other mention of Replay in the currently posted comments. My old Panasonic HS2000 (many many years old) is still going strong on ReplayTV.

    I like MyReplayTV on the web, and I like the skip forward button.

    Is Replay the Beta to Tivo's VHS? (figuratively speaking - where the alleged better technology doesn't always win). I admit that I've never owned a Tivo, but in the few times I did side-by-side them, I greatly preferred the Replay.

    --
    /. foreclosed on my sig.

  15. 30 skip is "hidden" Re:Motorola 6xxx HDDVR is best by FerretFrottage · · Score: 2, Informative
    It does have a 30 second skip...there is a remote control hack or two if you google around for it--although some people claim that comcast has disabled it on some boxes....it works on mine.

    Here's one source

    --
    "Look Lois, the two symbols of the Republican Party: an elephant, and a fat white guy who is threatened by change."
  16. comcast hd-dvr not as bad as expected by adpowers · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My mom surprised me one day saying she ordered the HD DVR from Comcast (which runs Microsoft software). It is like $5/month or something like that, and there was no up front purchase. I was horrified, someone between those two companies could be nothing less than spawn of the devil. Well, as usual, the installation experience was bad (I've never had a good install from Comcast), because their software servers were having problems and it took a few hours to download the software. After that, however, I was amazed at how much better it was than I expected. The interface is nothing to call home about, but at least it loads and moves pretty fast. The thing that impressed me the most was the HDTV recording ability. You are able to record two HD streams and watch another at the same time! I tried scrubbing through some HD shows we recorded and it was smooth at any speed I tried, it fast forwarded better than any digital content I have seen and even VHS tapes... and this was high definition content.

    Another that I appreciate is that it doesn't put ads on screen when you pause video, you can see exactly what you want to. It also doesn't assume what you are interested in and try recording shows it thinks you would like. Probably my biggest gripe is that it doesn't know what channels you don't get (which is probably Comcast's fault). It'll dispaly a bunch of channels while browsing the channels, but we don't get half of them. Not only does it take more time to scroll, but I have also tried recording shows that are on a channel we don't get. Since it doesn't know better, it silently tries to record it, yet nothing shows up. It would be nice if it could give us a warning. I have yet to see a show we weren't able to record (although, if it starts happening when the broadcast flag comes out, I'll have my parents return it).

    Last Sunday I set it to record the Oscars, and then I fast forwarded through at super speed and just watched the good parts. That was very handy.

    It also has firewire output, but I have yet to try transferring the shows to my PowerBook (using a utility that saves HD streams from firewire). I'd really like to do this so I can save all the IMAX movies on the INHD channels for a long period of time.

    Andrew

    1. Re:comcast hd-dvr not as bad as expected by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Probably my biggest gripe is that it doesn't know what channels you don't get (which is probably Comcast's fault). It'll dispaly a bunch of channels while browsing the channels, but we don't get half of them.

      I'm sure it would be simple to filter those channels from the list, but my guess is that they leave them there by design. They want you to see what you're not getting in hopes that you'll sign up for a more expensive package.

  17. Propaganda by TexTex · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It seems like all three have various nice features but all three also have negatives that you have to suffer through.

    Um...from reading the article (and I'd hope our submitter did, as he's the first feedback post praising the author)...you'll see how most of it defends the MS box on a point-by-point basis of what Tivo offers.

    To me, it reads like 'We can do everything Tivo can do better...' It's a response to Pogue's praise of Tivo with praise of his own. A fair comparison, a blogger's thoughts on DVRs, and a waste of slashdot's frontpage.

    --
    -Barkeep, a draft of your most hazardous brew, for the world is slowly stepping into focus, and I don't like what I see.
  18. phone line by Dop · · Score: 3, Insightful

    When are they going to get past the phone line requirement for initial setup? I have the DirectTV TiVo and it works great getting channel info right off of the satallite once it's setup, but I had to bring a dish over to a friends house to use their phoneline at first.

  19. My stance towards Tivo by Isldeur · · Score: 4, Insightful


    Here's my stance towards Tivo. I'd love to support that company - I like what they did originally and understand they have pressures these days so that things may be less than ideal.

    But I always knew I'd be moving towards HD, so I didn't jump the bandwagon when it first came out. Now I have two options:

    1. Buy a HD Tivo for more than $1000 and then pay a monthly fee of something like $13.00, or
    2. Get Adelphia's HD DVR for (get this) free for 5 months, then $4.95 per month.

    O.k. So Tivo might be better. But it isn't that better. And, as I never had one of the originals, (as most people ) I don't know the difference.

    Tivo, in its current form, without liscencing from Cable Companies, is dead. It's only time.

  20. Bittorrent... by homer_ca · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...is my Tivo!

    (not my joke. repeating another /.er's comment)

  21. words, some people have heard of them by motorsabbath · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Turn off your television, read a book. TV is for schmoes. ;-)

    --
    The heat from below can burn your eyes out
  22. I prefer UltimateTV by Goldenhawk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... over Tivo. We bought an UltimateTV reciever from Radio Shack (*gasp!*) about five years ago. Since then, my wife's mom upgraded from a basic DirecTV unit to a DirecTivo unit, and we have had plenty of time to use it, and we were so frustrated by the Tivo's limitations that we immediately went on eBay and bought a couple more used UTV units for spare parts and backup units. While not as hackable as a Tivo (you can upgrade the hard drive), the basic functionality is equal to a Tivo, the guide appears and scrolls far faster, the 30-second skip works perfectly, it's got the predictive resume everyone has been raving about in this discussion, and we actually like the fact it does NOT guess what we want to watch and fill up our hard drive unless we ask it to do so. And oh, yes, it does allow us to specify not to record duplicates, etc. One big plus - the Tivo's max fast forward speed only seems to be about 8x real time. The UTV will do 300x fast forward and rewind.

    Unfortunately, nobody sells these units new anymore; apparently Microsoft decided to put its eggs in the MCE basket instead.

    We looked at the HDTV version of the DirecTivo, and it was even worse than the basic DirecTivo.

    We won't be able to use the UTV boxen with HDTV, but then we don't watch TV so much that it really bothers us, and besides we are too far from a major market to get over-the-air HDTV anyway.

    --
    --Brandon / Split Infinity Music

  23. Tivo is dying by FreedomPolice · · Score: 2, Insightful
    DVRs are now a commodity, to profit Tivo should have kept innovating. Instead cheap cableco DVRs are eating Tivos lunch on the low end and Tivo has ceded the high end by not supporting HiDef. If Tivo wants to survive they need to:
    1. Get HiDef support NOW!
    2. Lower the cost of subscription. Many people use the internet to download show data, Tivo should pass the savings to the consumer. Current Tivo owners won't upgrade because newer Tivos aren't noticeably better than old ones, and people new to DVRs want either a cheap one or one that supports HD.
    3. Innovate dammit! Make the hard drives bigger and the box smaller, incorporate some of the best hacks out there into the base unit, come up with stuff that people don't even know they want yet, and above all get your head out of Hollywoods ass.
    1. Re:Tivo is dying by Gruneun · · Score: 2, Informative

      Get HiDef support NOW!

      They have it. It's been available for about a year now through DirecTV and it supports OTA broadcast. They can't provide it for cable companies because TiVo would have to support their individual formats and they all want to introduce their proprietary boxes.

      Lower the cost of subscription.

      They did. Additional TiVo cost less than the original. Lifetime service is still available and pays for itself in a few years. Then, there's no monthly charge.

      Innovate dammit!

      They have HD. They don't prevent people from adding larger drives. They have DVD recorders. They're opening the API. Meanwhile, they're building name recognition outside of the tech world. Give it some time.

      get your head out of Hollywoods ass
      Keeping off of Hollywood's radar has allowed them to survive where competitors have been sued into nonexistence.

  24. bottom line TCO by dmh20002 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    TFA didn't include an explicit comparison of TCO.

    cable box DVR is cheapest 5-10 a month, no up front

    tivo is cheap in the short run. $100 up front plus 12.95 a month

    MSFT media PC expensive $500+ up front. cheapest HP mcpc = $549 plus shipping, no ongoing cost for programming guide.

    Myth TV sw no cost, hw expensive up front similar $500+ for computer, no ongoing fee.

  25. Re:I use KnoppMyth by cesman · · Score: 2, Informative

    Well if you search the forum, you'll see that I recommend an nvidia geforce 440 or above. I've used one in each of my boxens without issue for well over a year.

    Regards,

    cesman

    --
    When the source is open, the possibilities are endless.
  26. I shopped hard and then went with KISS by rbrander · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I looked at TiVO, at the Interact-TV "Telly" (see interact-tv.com), at the Lite-On DVR, and very hard at MythTV.

    And finally, I went and bought a "humble" Pioneer DVR-520, that's just a VCR except it burns DVDs and/or records to hard drive. No network access to TV schedules at all, you have to set it to record Channel X at Y o'clock on day Z.

    TiVO might have won if they would just friggin' provide TV guide service to Canada, but they won't.

    And all the solutions that are really a Linux or Windows PC in a smaller box had the same problem: they crash.

    Most of them not often, but even once every few weeks is way too often. If it were just me, fine, but my wife was unequivocal: we don't NEED the thing, she's just wearily learning a new remote and whole new approach to TV just to get along with me..."But if it crashes like a PC in the middle of the Gilmore Girls, it's leaving the house through a closed window that you can pay for".

    The Plain Ol' DVR is not from a computer company, but the long-experienced consumer electronics company that made the first LaserDisc machines. It just works, was working 5 minutes out of the box, and won't crash on her though it be a fairly sophisticated computer.

    And frankly, I'm kind of glad to be talked into it as well. Upstairs, I geek out to my heart's content on a Linux box. Downstairs, watching TV, I'm generally beat, have a drink or so and supper inside me, and Just Want to Watch TV. Any technicalities deeper than picking my show off the playlist are unwelcome.

    This box meets the 80/20 rule. Anything that can do "chasing playback", skip ads, avoids fussing with tapes, and can make a DVD of those few shows I want to save, meets at least 80% of what you want from the experience.

    Setting it to catch all the shows we watch regularly took me about an hour. I guess another half hour per year will be needed to stop the recordings at the end of each season and start them again, often at new times, each fall. Avoiding that half-hour per year is not worth hundreds of dollars, and it ABSOLUTELY isn't worth managing another household computer through upgrades and patches and crashes.

    1. Re:I shopped hard and then went with KISS by rbrander · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Heh...I like the implied comment in the question: "didn't have the patience to dink with it"...as in, patience is a virtue, and lack of same is a fault.

      It's not a fault to want something to just plug in and go after you spend a lot of money on it.

      I 'dink with' a Linux box most evenings. I use MEPIS Linux, among the most plug-and-play distros ever developed. And the new version recently cost me most of a weekend with tedious, stupid stuff like not working with my new DVD writer and not being able to record audio because the ALSA controls are a whole separate level from the KMIX controls and they BOTH have to have "line' turned on.

      And I am morally CERTAIN that setting up a MythTV box is the same deal, squared and cubed. The commentary from MythTV fans, both on the web and at the Calgary Unix Users Group that I chair, is clear on that point. It only "just goes" if you have just the right hardware and the Gods smile that day.

      As for Linux never crashing, I don't mean full-blown BSOD; it just has to lock up for a few seconds to totally annoy most people. Now then, kindly put "mythTV freeze" into google and peruse the first few links. Then try "freeze pioneer "DVR-520" ' and note that while there are pages with both terms in them, none involve the product locking up. Some DVD players have frozen just playing a disk - a disk that a different player might handle. But none of the consumer-electronics products freeze when playing from the hard drive.

      Then don't get me started on my TV being useless for one weekend a year when I decide that it's time to upgrade my MythTV version...

      Bottom line: I get all the geeking and dinking my soul needs from playing with my general-purpose computer. I really tear my hair out on that a lot. Despite being committed to good old solid "uncrashable" Linux. I don't need any more of it when I'm just trying to knock back a few, get into a state of mind where I'm incompetent to handle complexity, and....watch TV.

    2. Re:I shopped hard and then went with KISS by rbrander · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Oh, yeah, forgot one point. My parts list for the proposed MythTV box ran $1500 Cdn. The DVR was $750 . Half the price for, I repeat, 80% of the functionality.

      Yes, yes, the two aren't comparable. The MythTV box would have had a top-end burner, a 200GB hard drive, the Hauppage 350 top-end video capture, and a $150 sound card that did 7.1 digital sound.

      But honestly? I wouldn't have used most of that functionality except on "Star Wars" type heavy-sound movies. And it all would have been obsolete in 3 years when HDTV is mainstream.

      So will the DVR be, but I'll only have spent half as much on it. In 3 years, MythTV will be much more stable and featureful, and a MythTV box that can digitize HDTV (if content controls even allow that) will probably be under $1500 - and I'll still have half that much unspent in the bank.

  27. fugetaboutit.... by Ryan+C. · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You won't be able to transfer those shows.

    There's a little thing called 5C or HDCP protection that flags shows as "copy once", "copy never", or "copy always". Unless the show is "copy always", the set top box will refuse to unencrypt the show for your Mac. It will only send them to an "approved" recording device like a HD-DVR that will them store them as "copy never". Think there will ever be an "approved" recording program or card for a PC/Mac? Nope. Never.

    The only channels that are usually copy always are the "must carry" over the air networks like ABC, NBC, CBS, PBS, etc. INHD will probably be "copy once" in your area (it is in my area).

    5C is similar in function to the broadcast flag. You're getting a sneak preview of what the broadcast flag will mean.

    The broadcast flag is slightly different in that it involves the FCC. But the 5C racket already has the US government providing muscle with the DCMA (illegal to circumvent the encryption).

    --
    -Ryan C.
  28. What the Frak is this Moron Going on About?? by TheDoctorWho · · Score: 2, Informative

    From the article:
    "Multiple tuners. Again, TiVo gives you one tuner per box, unless you're willing to pony up for the pricey DirecTiVo solution."

    My DirectTVTivo Box has 2 Tuners, paid $99 for it, for 70 hours of Programming, no extra costs at all. Just needed to run a co-axial like from the Dish.

    Moronic indeed.

  29. DirecTiVo HD by Snommis · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I recently went HD, and bought a DirecTv TiVo HD box (HR10-250) for $1000. I had always used ReplayTV prior, but Replay has no HD box. (I even e-mailed the company to see when they will have one. They said, in essence, "no time soon".)
    Frankly, after using the ReplayTV for so long, I guess I got spoiled, because I HATE my TiVo! Extremely slow guide (actually comes up in chunks), no 30 second skip (gonna try the hack from the article tonight, though), and why can I only pause for 30 minutes? I used to pause my Replay at the beginning of a hockey game (not that I have that to worry about this year) and come back an hour later to start watching. Skip all the commercials and intermissions and still return to live with about 5 minutes left in the game. I could go on about no networking capability, ect. but you get my point.
    Overall, the Tivo feels "Fisher Price" compared to the Replay. The menus look candy coated and dumbed down for the masses, and I really miss the pause countdown timer from my Replay. I hope like hell that Marantz (I think) realizes what they bought and runs with it! I'd ditch TiVo in a second.

    --
    Face it, do something enough times, and it can cause problems.
  30. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion