Slashdot Mirror


Virgin Radio Launches 3G Radio Service

An anonymous reader writes "Virgin Radio, one of UK's top radio stations, has launched the first 3G radio service for free (as in beer). This is great news for those with a Symbian equipped phone and an unlimited data plan. Various articles suggest that mobile radio could be a major threat to satellite radio. Russell Beattie and friends have had an initial look and commented on the program."

117 comments

  1. It's go Time Satellites by KingOfTheNerds · · Score: 5, Informative

    As stated in the Wall Street Journal, Virgin actually attempted to acquire Sirus radio early in 2004, however they could not settle on an amount and the deal fell through. This must be Virgins plan to twart satellite radio, and maintain their hold on the communications market. XM and Sirus should merge to stay competitive in the market and drop their prices. Only time will tell where they go with this one.

    --
    Want to learn about anything sexual? Check out the sex wiki:
    1. Re:It's go Time Satellites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      XM and Sirus should merge to stay competitive in the market and drop their prices.

      Why on Earth would a merged XM and Sirius drop their prices? Without competition they can raise their prices.

    2. Re:It's go Time Satellites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since when do Virgin have a hold on the communications market? I mean, sure they're a player in it and everything but it's not like they're dominant or anything.

    3. Re:It's go Time Satellites by KingOfTheNerds · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They would be competeing with the new phone radio market, which I think some of us agree would be huge. Of course if it wasn't huge they would raise their prices or probably be allowed to merge.

      --
      Want to learn about anything sexual? Check out the sex wiki:
    4. Re:It's go Time Satellites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Virgin radio is a franchise, and not directly part of Branson's empire.

    5. Re:It's go Time Satellites by binaryspiral · · Score: 1

      Why on Earth would a merged XM and Sirius drop their prices? Without competition they can raise their prices.

      Too late, XM Radio is already meeting the price/features of Sirius.

      Now if XM would just get NFL it would be a perfect radio station.

    6. Re:It's go Time Satellites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wha?! The NFL is probably the worst sport format to LISTEN to... I want to watch the game, not listen to it. XM already nabbed Major League Baseball and if any sport is meant for the radio - it's the MLB.

    7. Re:It's go Time Satellites by binaryspiral · · Score: 1

      If I'm 75 miles away from the nearest TV and driving - I'd want to listen to it.

      Not all of us get a comfy chair and can of beer on Sunday.

  2. Clarified ambiguity by Zone-MR · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm glad the station was launched "for free (as in beer)", as opposed to, erm, "for free (as in speech)".

    1. Re:Clarified ambiguity by Dwonis · · Score: 2, Informative
      What's funny is that "free (as in beer)" is confusing in itself. Beer isn't free...

      The phrase started as "free (as in free beer)", but naturally the computer industry added its usual confusing baggage to it.

      PCMCIA.

    2. Re:Clarified ambiguity by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I generally prefer my beer to be free (as in software).

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  3. Virgin will likey Lisense content by brownblaket · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Forbes recently had an article about how Verizon was planning a similar service. I find this really interesting because I heard a couple of reports on C-NBC today talking about how Verizon has been in private talks with Virgin about a technology license. The pundits seem to believe that verizon is trying to get a license from Virgin to carry their content on the verizon network.

    I think that this would actually be a really smart strategy for Virgin to employ. Think about it, Virgin not only gets the advertising for it first and everyone begins to associate it with them but then once it becomes famous they get a piece of everyone elses action.

    The world is moving towards total technolgy convergence where people will have a radio/mp3 player/phone (they already do actually). This will become another feature that every phone will have to have in a couple of years and Virgin will not hold a monopoly for very long. By letting people buy into their content they make sure that they get money from everyone.

    --
    Want to Learn about all about Sex and sex related things?
    1. Re:Virgin will likey Lisense content by ckemp.org · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We need to see smaller high performance batteries and cheap data plans before such polydevices can become mainstream. Sure, you can listen to the radio and take some pictures with that phone of yours, but you'll be murdering your total call time before recharge.

  4. Wait... by Capt'n+Hector · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If you have an unlimited data plan, what's stopping you from listening to internet radio on your cellphone?

    --
    Quid festinatio swallonis est aetherfuga inonusti?
    Africus aut Europaeus?
    1. Re:Wait... by Delta2.0 · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Isn't ulimited data transfer relatively expensive. Wouldn't it be cheaper to podcast or find open wifi?

    2. Re:Wait... by eggz128 · · Score: 1

      A program that can be installed on your phone.

    3. Re:Wait... by snrrrub · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, for one, doing 128 kbps on a GPRS network isn't exactly possible. So your radio stations have to support custom mobile streams. Then there's the problem of such streams. On a desktop, you can just browse around until you find something you like. On a cell phone, browsing is quite a pain. So you'd better have a known link. Of course, you also need a player for the stream. In this case, they've pretty much managed to put it all together in an easy-to-use (albeit restricted to VR) form. A lot of people (e.g. Nokia) go to great lengths to make things usable. When you're dealing with people who select "yes" when asked 3 times to install a virus, you'd better make it really really simple.

      -Snrrrub

    4. Re:Wait... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If this replaces conventional FM/DAB/XM broadcasts then are the mobile networks going to be able to cope? A 3G cell is not capable of giving the full 384kbps to every user all the time. If every user is constantly streaming even 32kbit/sec radio then they maybe in for trouble. Most users aren't talking on their phones all the time, but they could well be listening to the radio for hours on end.

    5. Re:Wait... by Mr2001 · · Score: 1

      Well, for one, doing 128 kbps on a GPRS network isn't exactly possible.

      Huh. People are still using GPRS? CDMA2000 has been doing 100+ kbps data transfers for years now with no special equipment. The speed does go up and down, but a 56k or 64k internet radio station is entirely listenable with a modern cell phone and a PDA/laptop.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
    6. Re:Wait... by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      Realplayer.

      https://www.helixcommunity.org

      One can make millions if he can code J2ME port of Helix but seems they are busy blaming it to be spyware and bitching about popups :)

    7. Re:Wait... by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      If you have an unlimited data plan, what's stopping you from listening to internet radio on your cellphone?

      I already do! My phone is not 3G though, so I use WiFi. I've streamed 64kbits over GPRS (2.5G) successfully though, but it's not exactly reliable.

    8. Re:Wait... by eggz128 · · Score: 1
      Huh. People are still using GPRS?

      Here in the UK, yes! To start with it's all GSM over here. None of your US CDMA weirdness :-) Secondly 3G coverage is less than spectacular once you get out of the major cities. A number of my friends have the 3 phones, but here in mid Wales all they get to use is O2 GPRS anyway.

      And for what it's worth, (now that I've actually managed to get the .sis file after the slashdotting), the Virgin streaming radio works fine over GPRS.
    9. Re:Wait... by PhotoJim · · Score: 1

      EDGE (the next generation of GPRS) can get into the 250kbps range although you have to be stationary to get that kind of throughput. 128kbps while moving is entirely possible.

    10. Re:Wait... by lga · · Score: 1

      None of your US CDMA weirdness :-)

      I hate to break it to you, but UK 3G networks are UMTS, otherwise known as W-CDMA, a variant of CDMA and licensed from Qualcomm.

    11. Re:Wait... by eggz128 · · Score: 1

      Well then, thanks for the info :)

  5. Isn't radio a step back though by moofdaddy · · Score: 1

    I thought radio was almost dead? I know when I am in my car I don't listen to the radio, I listen to my iPod. As mp3 players become more common place I think the radio is becoming a dying item.

    People won't want to listen to the radio on their phone, this will kill their battery life having to access and transfer that much data over the network. Phones are going towards mp3s, not radios. It would be like someone putting a record player in a car dashboard now.

    --
    Be better in bed. Wikiafterdark!
    1. Re:Isn't radio a step back though by Neophytus · · Score: 3, Informative

      Most new mid to high range phones sold in the UK also come with the ability to recieve FM radio stations. Radio is still going strong here - Clearchannel hasn't taken over.

    2. Re:Isn't radio a step back though by Luthair · · Score: 1

      People who spend a lot of time in their cars (commuters, trucks & delivery) listen to the radio more often than not. Beyond the fact that *most* adults don't yet own MP3 players, radio still has call-in shows as well as weather, traffic updates, current events, etc.

    3. Re:Isn't radio a step back though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet another slashdot story about how because I don't do something anymore, it must be dead.

    4. Re:Isn't radio a step back though by ScrewMaster · · Score: 1

      That may be true, but battery life is eventually going to become irrelevant. Whether it be some truly energy-dense electrochemical system, or maybe something on the order of butane-powered fuel-cells or some such, battery life is an issue that will be addressed one way or the other.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    5. Re:Isn't radio a step back though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      errr..no.

      I don't listen to music radio, 99% of my radio is current affairs, news and/or live sport. Also, as I live in the UK (lucky me) I have the good fortune to listen to a complete network that has neither adverts or corporate (as in Business) bias the good old BBC.

      Also, where am I going to get all my traffic reports?

      I'd be lost without Radio in my car with all the driving I do. I can't wait for digital radio to be more prevalent, then I can listen to all those 'AM' stations in crystal clear sound.

      Radio in the UK and as far as I can tell, Europe is far from dead.

    6. Re:Isn't radio a step back though by flyingsquid · · Score: 1
      Considering that the NPR audience has doubled in the past 10 years, I think radio is a long way from dead. Or perhaps the distribution method is dated, but new distribution methods for radio programming (streaming, MP3, satellite, wireless LAN) could produce a boom.

      When I'm at my computer doing a mind-numbing task, I listen to http://www.npr.org/ or http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio/. BBC news is very international, informative, and they ask penetrating, no-bullshit questions; they really make CNN look like the brain-dead losers they are. NPR has good news, interesting interviews (Fresh Air) and some really funny programs (Car Talk, Wait Wait Don't Tell Me). I'd listen to it on my iPod if I could figure out how in the hell to do that, right now the only option NPR gives you is streaming (and my university connection craps out constantly).

    7. Re:Isn't radio a step back though by ockegheim · · Score: 1

      In Australia, the reach of the commercial-free radio stations I like is far beyond the reach of 3G services, and I can listen for free on my inherited c. 2001 handset.

      When I'm overseas, I like tune in locally and get a bit of local culture.

      --
      I’m old enough to remember 16K of memory being described as “whopping”
    8. Re:Isn't radio a step back though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think you'll find adults listen to the radio and kids listen to MP3s, etc.
      There is a lot more to radio than music, don't you have stations that have great news and political coverage ? BBC is awesome for this.

  6. Bah by Enjoi · · Score: 3, Funny

    Phones are doing too much these days, you're not cool unless you've got all the addons now.
    Want to hear the radio? Buy a radio.
    Want to take pictures? Buy a camera.
    Want to go on the net? Buy a computer.

    Want to call someone? Oh, just wait while you navigate through the menu of silly addons.

    1. Re:Bah by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Phones ARE computers, and always have been. Modern phones are especially computer-y, though; mine has J2ME Mobile edition, for example, and can run whatever is MIDP 2.0 compliant. Also, when I want to make a phone call, I just start dialing and hit call, and I have yet to see a phone that doesn't work that way. If I want to use the phonebook, I can just hit down on my D-pad and bingo, I'm in the phone book. Having a camera in your phone does not make it harder to use. It does, however, kill off my suspended Java MIDlet when I use it, which is annoying.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:Bah by donweel · · Score: 1

      Really, what kind of tone deaf bonehead would listen to tunes on a cell phone. It's sad but I guess there will be a maket for this.

      --
      Many a long talk since then I have had with the man in the moon; he had my confidence on the voyage. Joshua Slocum
    3. Re:Bah by rjshields · · Score: 1

      I'm with you. My phone has an FM radio, camera, GPRS, xhtml browser, infra red, bluetooth and Java. Yet I never use this stuff and when I actually want to make a call, the sound quality is crap! I wish phone manufacturers would get the phone bit right before cramming in all the other gubbins.

      --
      In this world nothing is certain but death, taxes and flawed car analogies.
    4. Re:Bah by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      Really, what kind of tone deaf bonehead would listen to tunes on a cell phone. It's sad but I guess there will be a maket for this.

      The same tone deaf boneheads that have portable CD players, mp3 players, ipods, portable radios? A phone is capable of playing just as well as all the others. You have storage. You have CPU cycles to decompress the codec. You have an audio circuit.

      The sound quality on my phone is about average for a portable device.

      Or, are you thinking we are compressing our media in the 8-bit mono GSM-endoded voice codec?

    5. Re:Bah by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      My phone has an FM radio, camera, GPRS, xhtml browser, infra red, bluetooth and Java. Yet I never use this stuff and when I actually want to make a call, the sound quality is crap!

      He he, I bet you think there is a little genie in there doing all the work, and with his FM/bluetooth duties, he doesn't have the time to do as good a job on your phone calls.

      I've got a little surprise for you; the technical "gubbins" (I use that word as well ;-) HAS NO BREARING on the sound quality of a phone call. The comes down to the audio codec used (which is crap but efficient), the quality of the microphone/speaker (which is not really size related and is now fairly standard) and how the nework is set up.

      Your phones Java VM isn't what's making the calls sound poor!

    6. Re:Bah by rjshields · · Score: 1
      I bet you think there is a little genie in there doing all the work
      You're wrong, sorry to disappoint.
      I've got a little surprise for you the technical "gubbins" (I use that word as well ;-) HAS NO BREARING on the sound quality of a phone call.
      What makes you think I don't know that already? Your arrogance is amusing.
      The comes down to the audio codec used (which is crap but efficient), the quality of the microphone/speaker (which is not really size related and is now fairly standard) and how the nework is set up.
      It's the audio codec in this case.
      Your phones Java VM isn't what's making the calls sound poor!
      No shit! My point was that phone companies should get the phone part right before cramming the phone with other gubbins. Never once did I suggest these gubbins were causing the poor sound quality.
      --
      In this world nothing is certain but death, taxes and flawed car analogies.
    7. Re:Bah by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1

      Sorry, if you took any offence, probably should have used more smilies! What I was trying to (jokingly) say is that regardless of whether you get a all bells & whistles phone, or a basic "your mother could use it" Nokia, they all sound pretty much the same.

    8. Re:Bah by rjshields · · Score: 1

      It's OK - I thought you were being condescending, but it seems you were tongue in cheek. No offence taken :)

      --
      In this world nothing is certain but death, taxes and flawed car analogies.
  7. WoW! by HarryZink · · Score: 2, Informative


    This is a pretty nifty new angle, and something satellite radio most likely didn't consider - still, all things considered, mobile phones aren't really Hi-Fi devices (though if this catches on, the next generation *might* be -- but can you still receive phone calls while listening to the 'radio'?

    Still, generally Richard Branson does come up with some neat ways to keep his name on the map, so it'd be interesting how this does, and how many others will follow suit.

    1. Re:WoW! by Technonotice_Dom · · Score: 1

      Still, generally Richard Branson does come up with some neat ways to keep his name on the map, so it'd be interesting how this does, and how many others will follow suit.

      Virgin Radio was sold off from the Virgin Group back in 1997 I believe. Nothing to do with Branson, except the name.

      http://www.virginradio.co.uk/thestation/faq/virgin .html
      http://www.tiscali.co.uk/reference/encyclopaedia/h utchinson/m0074904.html

  8. Unfortunately.... by reality-bytes · · Score: 4, Interesting



    Unfortunately, at least in the UK, unlimited (3G) data plans seem rather hard to come by with the majority of services having sub 100MB caps or a pay-per-megabyte price structure.

    Slightly off-topic but related, Virgin is unusual as a 'major station' in the UK in that it offers its streams in Ogg/Vorbis format. (The BBC did previously but has stopped for an undetermined ammount of time).

    --
    Ripping an new rectum in the fabric of spacetime.
    1. Re:Unfortunately.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think its weird that virgin mobile doesn't yet have a 3G service!

    2. Re:Unfortunately.... by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      Tell me about it... Vodaphone just charged me £500 because I went 50MB over my quota whilst at a customers site.

      I cancelled immediately, and will *not* be getting 3G again until the prices come down (at least 10GB/month).

    3. Re:Unfortunately.... by Octagon+Most · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Vodaphone just charged me £500 because I went 50MB over my quota"

      I wish there was a +1 Damn! mod.

    4. Re:Unfortunately.... by Cpyder · · Score: 2, Informative
      I think its weird that virgin mobile doesn't yet have a 3G service!

      Don't let their names fool you. Virgin radio is no longer part of the "Virgin Empire", it's a company of SMG Radio.
      It used to be a part of Bransons' group, but he sold it. SMG just licenses the use of the name.

      see the Virgin Radio website for details on this

      Virgin Mobile does not operate their own network either, it's a virtual mobile network operator, which basically means they provide their own branded version of the T-Mobile network. Strange thing is that T-Mobile does offer 3G services, but apparently Virgin Mobile doesn't.

    5. Re:Unfortunately.... by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      Yeah, likewise. I've got 101 ways to such up that bandwidth, but I'm not paying that rate.

      I just got a phone that has WiFi built-in. I've not used mobile data since I got it, why bother? Free vs. extortainate. Tough choice!

    6. Re:Unfortunately.... by lga · · Score: 1

      Strange thing is that T-Mobile does offer 3G services, but apparently Virgin Mobile doesn't.

      While Virgin mobile doesn't sell 3G phones, if you put a Virgin SIM in a 3G phone then you can make calls on the T-Mobile 3G network. A few weeks ago you could also get 3G internet access this way without being charged but they have now closed that loophole.

  9. Free? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Symbian phones aren't exactly inexpensive. Unlimited data plans (at least in the U.S.) cost an arm and a leg. I wouldn't call this free.

    1. Re:Free? by eggz128 · · Score: 4, Informative

      In the UK you can get Symbian based phones for free on contract relatively cheaply. For example my Noia 6670 was free on my contract (~£25 per month, 250 Min cross network talk time free). I imagine 7650s (my last Symbian phone, £50 on a similar plan 2 years ago) are basically freebies on the cheapest plans now.

      As for unlimited data plans, O2 dont seem to charge for the use of the GPRS connection either. At least I've never been charged for it during 2 years woth of use.

    2. Re:Free? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Neither is 3G, but AT&T has unlimited internet for like $15 bucks now (on some plans?) and T-Mobile has had unlimited GPRS for $20/mo for quite some time. Sprint is 2.5G or something, right? I know they have a streaming TV system which was a free demo and now costs money, but they have unlimited internet pretty cheap with the restriction that you can't use your phone on your PC with it.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    3. Re:Free? by jez9999 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      £25/mo is enormous, and way more than I'd consider paying even for a landline. Why do people agree to pay these ridiculous sums for a mobile phone contract?

    4. Re:Free? by eggz128 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It depends. In my case I wanted the multi function phone. I can use it with my laptop to connect to the internet just about anywhere. WiFi hot spots arn't exactly plentyful in the UK, even less so in the middle of Wales. I also make pretty heavy use of the calandering (and alarm), and since I got this 6670 I've used the (suprisingly good) Netfront web browser to read slashdot and other web sites while I have my lunch at the local cafe. I don't actually use many of my 'free' talk time.

      On the other hand, a friend of mine did manage to rack up an £80 mobile phone bill recently after using all her talk time. If she'd been on a slightly more 'expensive' plan she would have shaved quite a sum off that bill. If she'd used a pay-as-you go service plan, I dread to think what the cost would ave been.

    5. Re:Free? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you read that comment all the way through? That £25 includes the cost of the phone and calls.

    6. Re:Free? by radish · · Score: 1

      Errr...show me one significantly less. I'm on a pretty basic Cingular plan here and it works out at around $50.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    7. Re:Free? by rob_squared · · Score: 1

      If you're grandfathered in under the old AT&T wireless service (now cingular) its only $24.99 a month. Which beats the hell out of $80 on cingular's own plan. I love sticking it to the man.

      --
      I don't get it.
    8. Re:Free? by Thing+1 · · Score: 1
      Unlimited data plans (at least in the U.S.) cost an arm and a leg.

      Reminds me of Crow T. Robot: "I'd give my right arm to be ambidextrous!" (MST3K)

      --
      I feel fantastic, and I'm still alive.
    9. Re:Free? by CodeArtisan · · Score: 1

      I pay $10 per month unlimited data on my CDMA phone in the US. Sprint PCS still offers unlimited for $15, which isn't outrageous. I can stream Virign Radio over the net and play it on MMPlayer without any problems. Of course, this isn't on a Symbian device.

  10. World turned upside down by flopsy+mopsalon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I find it ironic that free music is now being supplied to anyone with a measly $216/month to pay for unlimited data transfer to their mobile phone, while 12 year old kids who download their free music are being sued by the minions of the RIAA.

    Music should bring people together instead it is driving a wedge between the haves and have-nots. I am shocked and appalled.

    1. Re:World turned upside down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, of course it's not really free as in beer, any more than network television is. You pay for it every time you buy a product that is advertised there.

  11. Symbian? by rainman_bc · · Score: 1

    Isn't a Symbian a strange sex machine where they attach a dildo to a jackhammer and mount it to a total-gym or something?

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    1. Re:Symbian? by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      Thats a Sybian. And dont EVER ask how I know this.

    2. Re:Symbian? by teahousemusic · · Score: 1
      I'd suggest looking here:

      Open Source programs for SymbianOS

      http://symbianos.org/

      Symbian OS software development kits

      http://www.symbian.com/developer/sdks.asp

      Python for Series 60

      http://www.forum.nokia.com/main/0,,034-821,00.html

    3. Re:Symbian? by rob_squared · · Score: 1
      Isn't a Symbian a strange sex machine where they attach a dildo to a jackhammer and mount it to a total-gym or

      Yeah, if your "m" key is broken.

      --
      I don't get it.
  12. Humbug by The+Amazing+Fish+Boy · · Score: 0

    Want to hear the radio? Buy a radio. Want to take pictures? Buy a camera. Want to go on the net? Buy a computer.

    That's all very well and good, but I can't fit a radio, a camera, a computer, and a phone in my pockets at the same time.

    By the way, your inclusion of "computer" is funny, since a computer is a multi-purpose device in itself. Would you also advise people to have one web browsing computer, one emailing computer, one games machine, one mp3 player, all separate?

    There are many benefits to convergence, let's not let that case go unstated.

  13. erm.. by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 1

    WTF does "Free like.." mean?

    Surely free means free.. :/

    --
    I like muppets.
    1. Re:erm.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it's from the open source community to stop confusion between "having no cost" and "having no restrictions"

      free sample of cheese
      free the weed

    2. Re:erm.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      err, you're new here aren't you?

  14. Broadcasting to by Jozer99 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Broadcasting to all 14 Symbian Smartphone owners with unlimited data plans currently in 3G coverage areas...

    1. Re:Broadcasting to by twalls · · Score: 1

      That's alright. There'll just be more free bandwidth for me to gobble up! ;)

    2. Re:Broadcasting to by TonkaTown · · Score: 1

      What morons modded this up as funny?

      If it'd been picking on say MS Mobile and 3G in the US they might have had a point, but look at the numbers, 14 isn't even a factor of a 1000 out.

    3. Re:Broadcasting to by Jozer99 · · Score: 1

      The above post is a striking reminder not to post on slashdot while drunk.

  15. Data rates by snrrrub · · Score: 1

    Actually, the data rates in the US are quite affordable. T-Mobile offers unlimited GPRS for $19.99. What's more, this app runs on 2.5G (GPRS) as well.

    Really, $20/mo seems reasonable, especially considering the amount of money techofreaks and gadget geeks spend on other seemingly useless things. :-)

    -Snrrrub

    1. Re:Data rates by eobanb · · Score: 1

      It's not 19.99, it's 29.99.

      --

      Take off every sig. For great justice.

    2. Re:Data rates by chris234 · · Score: 1

      It's 19.99 if you add it to voice service. 29.99 is for data-only. Not well documented on the website.

    3. Re:Data rates by piltdownman84 · · Score: 1

      Wow thats really good, my carrier wants $7 a MB. Their largest plan is 2 MB for $12. They use to have unlimited for $50 a month, but they got rid of that about a year ago.

      They try to mislead you by putting a tiny internet plan in a bundle and calling it "Mobile Internet". You have to read the small print to understand that in your $9 "Voicemail, Call Display, and Mobile Internet" bundle you only get 1/4 of a MB of internet, and everything after that is $7/MB. This can really add up when on ringtones not only do they hit you for $2 each, but also the bandwidth. They also do lots of crooked stuff like put big (for a cellphone) pictures on their wap pages. I think the idea is not make money on people using the service over time, but to bleed them dry the first month of use.

      I can say thats its a big shock when you end up with a $200 data bill on your phone bill, when all you did was download two ringtones, and check sports scores about once a day. Lucky I didn't have bluetooth at the time. I can't imagine how large my bill would have been if I had use the phone's internet with my labtop.

  16. Or digital radio? by WoTG · · Score: 1

    It's not too far off, I think most of the big stations in Canada are dual broadcasting now. Receivers are still scarce... and too large for phones though.

  17. Virgin Radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Virgin Radio - "Radio run by Slashdot readers for Slashdot reader"

  18. Is Symbian open-source? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was wondering: Is Symbian open-source? I looked at their website and found open-source projects mentioned but it doesn't say explicitely that Symbian itself is an open-source OS or something proprietory.

  19. Not the first 3G radio service by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I agree it's the first software targeting a widely available sartphone platform (Symbian) but it's not the first 3G Radio Service available ( read more ).

    For example, Windows Media on Windows Mobile devices (Pocket PC Phone Edition and Smartphone) have been available for years now and will play any radio stream in the WMA format. And what's more, no need to download and install additional software.

    No, don't come with "open" platform stuff, because the Virgin Radio is tied to their network, and the company did not disclose what streaming technology is being used.

    It's not the first 3G service also because the Harrier Pocket PC Phone Edition (a.k.a. Verizon XV6600 in the USA) is a CDMA EV-DO device, connecting at speeds of 500Kbps average - higher than the WCDMA/UMTS average speeds, and available for some time now.

    1. Re:Not the first 3G radio service by John+Hurliman · · Score: 1

      Last year I predicted Verizon would be the first to roll out service capable of streaming digital music with their EV-DO network. Looks like I was wrong, but eventually first-to-market attempts like these will be run over by generic high-speed mobile connections through cellphones that could hook up to a laptop, Internet-enabled MP3 player, Internet-enabled home stereo, etc.

      Here's the paper I wrote on it (warning, a bit lengthy): http://www.jhurliman.org/misc/fmradio-alternatives -12092004.pdf

  20. No by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    You're looking at a rate plan with no minutes and unlimited GPRS. Adding GPRS to a normal plan costs $19.99/mo. The $29.99 plan you mention is really just for people who just want to use their cellphone as a GPRS modem and maybe to make emergency calls.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  21. virgin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How many times I told you not to use virgin word in stories ? You dont have to rub it.

  22. "Unlimited" usually isn't by glomph · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Read the F*cking Fine Print. Unlimited Data service has a lot of exceptions. I'll bet you the streaming radio service becomes an exception if anybody actually uses it. I signed up for unlimited data, then saw that it was unlimited only with one phone, and NOT when you used the phone as a modem for your bluetooth-connected laptop, and not when you wore brown shoes, or drove a Swedish-made automobile. All of that vented, Virgin Radio is cool, they have always been a leader in internet streaming, since the beginning (1995, when I helped get them started)

  23. Like a checkers playing chicken.... by 9thFairway · · Score: 1

    .....sort of interesting, but do you really want to listen to music over a phone speaker?
    Do you think the rest of us want to hear it too?

    --
    -every shot makes somebody happy!
  24. Headsets by snrrrub · · Score: 1

    Most (if not all) of these phones have stereo headsets that can be attached as well. You don't have to use the speaker but you can if you wanted to. The sound quality is naturally far better on the headset.

  25. Is this working for anyone by grahamsz · · Score: 1

    I can't even download the s60 binary from their site?

    It sounds like it needs about 22kbps so it should be well within the realm of gprs (no need for 3g).

    Does anyone know what port they use for streaming?

    1. Re:Is this working for anyone by FRiC · · Score: 1

      It does work with GPRS, or better yet, EDGE. The Series 60 version only works with Series 60 2.0 though.

    2. Re:Is this working for anyone by twalls · · Score: 1

      It didn't work when I tried earlier but it appears to be back up now. However, the program is having issues with installing on older versions of Symbian (i.e. Nokia 3650), of which Sydus is apparently aware of and is hoping to have some sort of an update out by Monday.

  26. For Free . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I really hate it when people say "for free".

    1. Re:For Free . by piltdownman84 · · Score: 1

      Its really smart for them

      1) Virgin Radio offer free streaming radio
      2) Virgin Mobile charges users users £ ? a MB for data.
      3) Unknowing parents get kid's £10,000 phone bill 4) Profit

  27. /. macro expansions... by Goonie · · Score: 1
    Haven't you heard about the Slashdot macro preprocessor and standard comment library? Amongst the standard comments there's:
    • libertarian_space_rant(EVENT): This EVENT shows that NASA is redundant and scrapped immediately. Space should be explored by private hands.
    • in_my_day_we_had_8_bits(NEW_PROC, OLD_PROC): I can't really see the point of the NEW_PROC. My first computer had an OLD_PROC, and it was perfectly adequate for random_app() then and would be perfectly adequate now. I'd prefer maker(NEW_PROC) concentrated on reducing costs and power consumption.
    • the_sky_is_falling(PROJECT): While PROJECT might have been feasible before September 11, the unprecedented threat of terrorism, which as all y'all know never existed before 2001, needs to be taken into consideration. How would we prevent terrorists attacking PROJECT and kiling people_involved(PROJECT)?
    • and most relevantly, i_made_my_excuses_and_left(SMARTPHONE_MODEL, DODGY_SEXUAL_PRACTICE)Hmmm. The SMARTPHONE_MODEL is a Symbian. That sounds just like Sybian. I never you you could use SMARTPHONE_MODEL for DODGY_SEXUAL_PRACTICE...tee he he.
    • Yes, Symbian sounds like Sybian. Yes, the idiot marketroids that chose that name should be reassigned to do PR for the Japanese whaling industry or something similarly rewarding. But we've all heard that joke every time a Symbian-related story appears on Slashdot and it's getting damned old.

    --

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
    --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
    1. Re:/. macro expansions... by rainman_bc · · Score: 1

      Seriously I had never heard that joke on /. b4, but I admit I was kidding ;)

      I'm with you - if I hear a "In soviet russua you!" joke, I might have to start unleashing mod points lol...

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  28. Rhapsody-on-cellphone is what I'm waiting for ... by Heisenbug · · Score: 1

    Once I can listen to 90% of recorded music anywhere, any time, for a flat $10 a month, I will never ever use any other musical product or service again. iPod? Radio? CD? iTunes? It'll all be replaced by a new addiction -- the world's music piped directly into my brain. Seriously, all you other distributors, that's the measure of your useful life, better get used to it.

    And the next time I get stuck in a no-service zone, I will cry, cry, cry ...

  29. I've been saying this for a while... by gearmonger · · Score: 1
    Why satellite radio is a fad.

    Within 10 years, Sirius and XM will either morph into some variant of themselves, or they'll just dry up and blow away.

  30. XM Rules by MHobbit · · Score: 1

    XM continues to beat Sirius...

    I'd prefer it if XM doesn't merge with Sirius. However, if it's required to keep competition against stupid Virgin Mobile, I guess it's a must.

    --
    Debugging? Klingons do not debug. Bugs are good for building character in the user.
  31. what i'm curious about... by niteice · · Score: 1

    Are they going to integrate this with their airline? I flew Virgin 2 years ago and they were probably the best airline I've been on. Satellite radio would be a spiffy addition to their seatback entertainment.

    --
    ROMANES EUNT DOMUS
  32. Any low bandwidth realaudio can be streamed by petree · · Score: 2, Informative

    This sounds like a lot of hype for something that's out there for symbian phone owners already. With an unlimited data plan in hand, download RealOne for Symbian, find your favorite station that streams using RealAudio (BBC has more than a dozen plus world service in 43 languages) and go.

    My favorite is listening to This American Life...I'll be honest, my Nokia 3650 only supports 16khz/8bit/mono, but it's certainly listenable...if only I had an adapter between the the headset port and a 1/8" jack, then I could use it with my car stereo.

    1. Re:Any low bandwidth realaudio can be streamed by Ilgaz · · Score: 1

      I have good news for you as you are a Nokia customer.

      Now Nokia is in Helix community, official member and I bet they started to code already.

      Its a good idea to bookmark/rss them to see whats coming next:

      https://helixcommunity.org/

  33. You mean... by daBass · · Score: 1

    ...other than the quality of content? It's no good being free if it's no good...

  34. Satellite Radio or Virgin mobile Radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder which one has more potential Satellite or radio on mobile phones? I'm taking up space in a land called malaysia where its hard if not impossible to get music from outside without the internet. With this new virgin thing its been a refreshing change. Those of you who are US and have access to satellite radio, can you tell share how good satellite radio is from this virgin one? here is where you can get the virgin radio http://virginradio.co.uk/thestation/mobile or http://sydusmobile.com/download.html What sort of content programming do you have in satellite radio? Can it be heard outside the car?

  35. It's NOT free by Andy_R · · Score: 1

    It's advert supported, not free. Around 10% of the audio will be adverts, just like Virgin's conventional radio station.

    --
    A pizza of radius z and thickness a has a volume of pi z z a
  36. No telco network will touch it by mark2003 · · Score: 1

    I don't understand why any telco operator would offer this service. Telco networks are designed for multiple point to point connections, they are not a broadcast, one to many architecture.

    Streaming the same data to multiple handsets will take up ridiculous amounts of bandwidth on all layers of the 3G architecture from the backbone (fiber) to the radio access layer (node B to handset). The cost of upgrading a network to support the extra load vs. the amount of revenue it would bring in (you can't charge much money for "free" radio) would make it cost prohibitive.

    Much better (and cheaper) just to include an FM receiver in the handset.

    1. Re:No telco network will touch it by wireless+watch · · Score: 1

      Well.. charging for the connection time is why the carrier's would do this..!!! But, your point about adding FM (or TV) Tuner makes sense and we see many models enabled for true FREE in the airwaves content. That might make some people wonder why the carriers would allow such a thing on their handsets.. but then the customers like it & really they make most $$ on voice charges anyway..!!! However, I just put Mp3's onto the SD Memory card and play all the tunes I want to hear, that seems most popular here in Tokyo. 8-)

    2. Re:No telco network will touch it by mark2003 · · Score: 1

      That is my point - no-one will pay enough to justify the cost of the bandwidth.

      For example Vodafone have a data card that costs around $1/MB, fine for business data but no-one would pay $7 to listen to the radio for an hour.

      3 have cheaper rates, but based on the cost of their downloads per MB it would still work out at $4/hour to listen to a radion station that you could pick up for free with and FM tuner in the right area.

      Dropping the price any further would hit company revenue - these companies are struggling enough as it to even attempt to make a profit, particularly when you factor in the cost of the licences they bought.

      Now when you consider that the majority of 3G users in the UK are in the south east of the coutry and hence have Virgin radio on FM (the rest of the coutry has it on AM) I don't understand how they will get any listeners over 3G at all. The business case is sh*te.

    3. Re:No telco network will touch it by wireless+watch · · Score: 1

      Mark: Indeed, I no idea about the data plans in U.K. but here in Japan flat-rate accts for 3G are popular and so the costs per hour would not be much of an issue for most heavy users.. although battery power sure would be! Again, I find that the majority of people are listening to music from their SD Memory card or some who have FM Tuners built-in to the handset. It would seem that Virgin is just playing the global marketing stunt.. good headlines but vapor-ware in the short-run,, 8-) Lars.

  37. radio will be subject to carrier regulations? by maccheesedog · · Score: 1

    radio on my cellie sounds real cool and convenient, but I still think the xm's and sirius's will have the best content, unregulated by the fcc. carriers can be even more controlling than the fcc, can you say 'walled garden'? carriers have numerous content regulation requirements that have to met before content is allowed on their network (decency standards, political correctness, etc).