Slashdot Mirror
New Dr. Who Episode Leaked
Cougem writes "BBC News is reporting on how an episode from the brand new series of the old science fiction TV show, Doctor Who, has been leaked onto the Internet. 'A 45-minute episode, called Rose, has appeared three weeks before the series is expected to begin on BBC One. Rose is the name of the character played by pop singer Billie Piper, who will be the assistant to the Doctor, played by Christopher Eccleston.' With people saying sci-fi appeals more to the technical minded viewer, will this TV show's release onto the Internet damage the ratings considerably for the BBC? Or is it a minor problem for a corporation whose role is just to provide the public with entertainment?" Maybe it will boost ratings, instead; the public buzz about "leaks" is still far ahead of the average viewer's ability to actually find and download.
alt.binaries.drwho
can anyone say "Promotional Ploy that Slashdot fell for"?
** "It's not my job to stand between the people talking to me, and the ones listening to me." -- Pego the Jerk
Who believes these 'leaks' anymore?
Or is 'leak' just a fig leaf to cover over the fact that good advertising may conflict with some of the copyrights and legalese?
Get thee glass eyes, and, like a scurvy politician, seem to see things thou dost not.--King Lear
You see what happened was Dr. Who downloaded the episode legally from BBC's open archives in 2052, as a piece of nostalgia from his earlier days, but forgot to unshare it from Kazaa again when he travelled back to 2005. D'oh!
Given that the SciFi channel isn't showing it, it can only help the interest within the USA.
Unless the episode sucks. I mean sucks like a hover upright. Then it might hurt ratings
500 dollar reward for tip(s) leading to the arrest of the person(s) who stole my sig.
It's shocking, really. They go to all that effort to keep it secret, and dirty bastards go and ruin it all by watching it months ahead of time. The file-sharing creeps.
Having said that, it's a lot better than I expected. Billie Piper is a much better companion than I though she'd be, and the Doctor is quite credible as, er, a time-travelling alien. No mention of that half-human shite, which is nice.
It'd be injudicious of me to mention that the file is called Rose1.avi, and is 366757888 bytes long, so I won't.
He's on first.
Rhapsody in Numbers
From news.bbc.co.uk: "The BBC was unavailable for comment."
Investigative journalism is truly dead.
Don't worry...
Your alone.
On Arrakis: early worm gets the bird. Magister mundi sum!
Thank you and have a nice day.
Update For for the dupe. Not going well. Appreciate all the hate mail. Really encourages improvement.
One
Two
Three
In 5....4....3....2....1....
That green slime had it coming.
Likewise dont go into watching this expecting it to be the BSG remake others where hoping for, THIS IS DR WHO, like Dr Who of when I was a kid and where watching the 60's reruns. Its campy and funny and ejoyable and a real family show. I know a lot of people where hoping for it to be remade but its not they are making this to be just like the old shows minus the cardbord and celophane sets.
"Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."
i personally think the BBC should provide free downloads (by bittorrent or something) to UK residents who have a tv license.
They could probably increase revenue if they created a subscription service for non-UK viewers too.
Warren Ellis reviewed just this (I'm not going to link to his site, it's already slow), and said that Americans would almost certainly not enjoy it. It's (as far as he's concerned) a return to many things that're right and wrong with Brittish television, but far too Brittish for most of the rest of the world to enjoy, especially us Yanks.
"Word is that Sci-Fi Channel declined to acquire this new DOCTOR WHO series. And I can see why. It's too damned English." -Ellis
and check out her ex http://www.bbc.co.uk/bbcthree/imagedump/6452.jpg
we're all in with a chance!!!
http://www.torrentspy.com/search.asp?mode=torrentd etails&id=184585
bort.
Free, Anonymous surfing: Pagewash.com.
The BBC itself does actually want to try something similar, and you might have seen the articles here about the then director general Greg Dyke discussing a "BBC Archive", and I'm pretty sure the R&D dept. was messing around with Bit Torrent.
However, the main problem (as with the BBCs "listen again" radio feature, but far more problamatic for TV) is the Writers Guild of Great Britain, which is extremely upset that the BBC plans to offer these shows without paying royalties to the writers. They have yet to bash out an additional payment to allow this...
I mean sucks like a hover upright.
Sshhh! You'll spoil the new Dalek design!
If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
No adverts to edit out \o/
My Portfolio
Come on guys, you're slacking. Where's the .torrent? You know you want to...
"Physics is to math as sex is to masturbation." -R. Feynman
im a tax payer ( well i pay the license fee for BBC TV ) so technically ive already paid for the Beeb to produce this. I wonder how it can be convulted to prove that if I download it then im not infringing copywrite !
And thats why Firecrackers and kittens don't mix.
Visit the BBC website and read its charter. You're both off, you moreso than the original poster.
It could help their ratings, or it could hurt. It really depends on the episodes ability to stand on it's own. If it's a good episode and brings some new things to the table, it will get some good word of mouth amongst those who care. If it is a slop-shod episode, that brings nothing new to the table and is a thin attempt to reskin an old episode, then it will get bad word of mouth.
The risk because of the leak is great. I cannot believe it was intentional due to this; If the episode is good, word of mouth will be good and it will travel through the ranks of Dr. Who fans. It probably won't do a thing to add viewers, because people who don't already watch it, are not going to care, as they never had interest before, and probably won't until it hits the screen. A bad review from the leak, will cause fans to knock the show, and drive anyone who might have watched it to not watch it and hurt viewership.
In short, leaking is never very good. The damage can be great whereas the potential good that can come from it is extremely small. No one cares about good news, unless it is something that they care about to begin with. Everyone loves to hear bad news. Fact of life. That's why the evening news is nearly 100% bad news.
The plot was full of holes.
Bah-dum Dum!
nipple slip
topless sunbathing
another angle topless
CBC was the first international network to license the new Dr. Who series - this was announced last October. The series starts on Tuesday April 5th, at 8pm in most time zones. I'm very impressed - that's only a few days behind the UK broadcast schedule. Its been so many years since I the heyday of Tom Baker - http://www.tombaker.tv/ - Let's hope the next 13 episodes are worth watching!
Ba-da-da-dumm ba-da-da-dumm ba-da-da-dumm ba-da-da-dumm Ba-da-da-dumm ba-da-da-dumm ba-da-da-dumm ba-da-da-dumm
ooooo eeeee ooooooooo (Ba-da-da-dumm ba-da-da-dumm ba-da-da-dumm ba-da-da-dumm) eeeee ooooooooo
dummmmm dummmm dummmmm daaaaaaah ta-dummmmm daa-daa-daa dummmmmmmm....
File under 'M' for 'Manic ranting'