Slashdot Mirror


World's First Fuel-Cell Motorcycle

Alex writes "Rubber Magazine reports that the British company Intelligent Energy has unveiled today the first purpose-built, fuel-cell motorbike. The bike has a 6kW (8 hp) electric motor, top speed of 50 mph (80kph), a range of 100 miles (160km). The engine is completely silent, which might not go well with many motorcycle lovers. In addition it could also possibly pose an interesting safety issue, since a pedestrian or motorist would not hear it coming."

53 of 481 comments (clear)

  1. Cool by BWJones · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In addition it could also possibly pose an interesting safety issue, since a pedestrian or motorist would not hear it coming.

    We bicyclists have the same problem, but if one obeys the rules of the road, there should be no problem. The problem bicyclists (and many motorcyclists) have is with people in their automobiles who fail to properly look out and are too busy talking on the damned cell phone while driving their gas sucking SUVs. (Disclaimer: I own a Toyota 4runner, but bicycle back and forth to work every day, and run many of my errands on the bicycle) My recent experience with a near miss can be read here.

    The engine is completely silent, which might not go well with many motorcycle lovers.

    I have to admit that when I did ride motorcycles, there was a certain magic about either the banshee wail of a sport bike as you wound it up while screaming up a canyon road or even the relaxed "POTATO POTATO POTATO" of the Harleys. However that said, this is going to be the future of transportation and I would most certainly embrace fuel cell technology that reduces the worlds outrageous consumption of oil. Plus, this ENV bike is a pretty sweet looking ride.

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    1. Re:Cool by craXORjack · · Score: 5, Funny
      In addition it could also possibly pose an interesting safety issue, since a pedestrian or motorist would not hear it coming.

      It's not a problem really. Just tape a playing card to it so it flaps against the spokes. Worked for me when I was a kid. Between that and the banana seat, I was too cool for school.

      --
      Liberals call everyone Nazis yet they are the closest thing to it.
    2. Re:Cool by Dun+Malg · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I know a person who got a ticket for having a loud stereo, which pales in comparison to the sound of a Harley.... yet a Harley can drive up my street at 2 AM and not be considered a problem, while this person was on the way to work in the morning and got ticketed because the windows were down in the car and the cop could hear the music. What a f*cked up society we live in.

      Personally, I'd like to see both the 2AM fuckwit yuppie straight-pipe-equipped Harley riders and the 7AM loud stereo with the windows down "EVERYONE will now enjoy my shitty music" dickheads get ticketed. Neither act of excessive noise generation is excusable. Fucked up (and self cetered) society indeed.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    3. Re:Cool by jc42 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I know a person who got a ticket for having a loud stereo, which pales in comparison to the sound of a Harley

      Maybe this is the solution. Have a loud stereo system on the bike that's looping an MP3 of a Harley. Then they'll hear you coming, and you won't get ticketed.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    4. Re:Cool by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'll grant that it's possible to over-the-top wrt loud pipes -- but the biggest risk to a competant motorcyclist is cagers who don't know about their presence. Driving a silent vehicle sure seems to me like it would exaserbate that risk.

      Unfortunately, that's just a risk we riders face when we get on the road. We deal with that risk by assuming no one can see us (other than traffic cops!), and anyone who thinks that loud pipes will alleviate that risk is either rationalizing or not terribly bright.

      I don't see that many riders with loud pipes dressing completely in yellow, which they would do if making others aware of their presence was really the foremost consideration. There is no statistical proof that loud motorcycles increase rider safety, and any anecdotal evidence is easily overcome by anecdotal evidence that people are annoyed by motorcycle noise. It's not like we need to give someone in an automobile more excuse for their road rage. You might think I'm being paranoid, but I firmly believe that a healthy dose of paranoia makes for a healthier rider.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    5. Re:Cool by soft_guy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Sure, people like the loud sound of some motorcycles. But I can also imagine growing to love the Zen of riding a silent bike through on a scenic trip. No loud sounds - just the wind and the sounds of nature. I think that would be cool.

      --
      Avoid Missing Ball for High Score
  2. Now all it needs... by gardyloo · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... is a sidecar with a tactical nuke in it.

  3. Motorcycles are already pretty damn fuel efficient as is.

    1. Re:Meh by bani · · Score: 4, Funny

      leave it to /. readers to complain about something being too fuel efficient...

    2. Re:Meh by agm · · Score: 3, Informative

      Depends on the bike. Neither of mine are particularly fuel efficient. My VL1500 gets about 170km to 13 liters, and my DR-Z400 gets about 100km to 11 litres.

    3. Re:Meh by ergo98 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually most motorbikes get terrible fuel efficiency compared to what people probably imagine.

  4. moto myths by tedtimmons · · Score: 5, Informative

    Myths:
    • Not all motorcycles are made by Harley.
    • Not all motorcycles are cruisers or sportbikes.
    • Not all motorcyclists like loud pipes.
    -ted, motorcycling geek
    1. Re:moto myths by tedtimmons · · Score: 5, Insightful

      i have yet to see someone who didnt ride their
      motorcycle around as some kind of penis extender.


      That's because you notice the loud bikes, dangerous riders, etc.

      Just like if someone says "the only thing on the road are these huge SUVs". That's because they are big and you are looking for them- a Honda Accord, Toyota Camry, etc is generic enough that you don't notice it. That doesn't mean they aren't there.

      A Goldwing isn't a cruiser, and you probably haven't seen many people pulling wheelies on them. Others: nearly every bike by BMW, many dualsport and adventure bikes by other makers, the SV650 and clones. These bikes aren't cruisers or sportbikes- they are standards. Sure, there are stupid people on bikes, but there are stupid people on cars, too.

      Many of us follow the MSF or Team Oregon philosophy, reducing our risk as much as possible. Don't judge an entire population based on a miniscule subset.

      -ted, motorcycling geek who doesn't need to compensate

    2. Re:moto myths by multiplexo · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Another Myth:

      Having a loud bike will protect you because motorists will be able to hear you.

      I hate to bum the high of all of the Harley riders out there but I've met quite a few guys who have been in serious motorcycle accidents (i.e., they ended up having a leg cut off) and quite a few of them had big, noisy cruiser style bikes. The Hurt report (yes, that's what it is called) didn't find any correlation between how much noise a motorcycle makes and its likelihood of being involved in an accident with another vehicle.

      Jamie - former motorcylist, current amputee

      --
      cheap labor conservatives - they want to keep you hungry enough to be thankful for minimum wage.
    3. Re:moto myths by anagama · · Score: 4, Interesting


      Yeah! You speak the truth my friend. If I had mod points, you'd get them. I'm partial to older bikes, especially 80's standard Japanese bikes, and older BMWs. The bearded tatooed Harley thugs/wannabethugs and the tshirt/shorts/flipflops crotch-rocket-cool-dudes all look down on these, but I love them. Power aplenty, nice handling, and comfortable riding positions. I once took an early 80s Nighthawk 650 on a 1500 mile trip. It was a blast.

      As an aside, I learned how to adjust my valves this weekend (1978 BMW R80/7), and after a spline lube this coming weekend, I'll know most of the basic maintenance for this machine. I'm a wannabe motorcycle geek right now - hope to be halfway competent in a couple years - but looking forward to some extended motorcycle camping this summer.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    4. Re:moto myths by temojen · · Score: 3, Informative
  5. motorcycle lovers by whizzard · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The engine is completely silent, which might not go well with many motorcycle lovers.

    Somehow, I think that the top speed of 50 mph might not be that popular either.
  6. silence in cars too by drmike0099 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The silence issue also exists for the electric cars. At low speeds or coasting they run pretty much silent and, since they're a lot larger, could pose as much of a threat. If you've ever run through LA and almost been hit by one popping out of a blind alley (cuz nobody stops at the end of alleys here) that you weren't able to hear while approaching, you know what I'm talking about...

  7. Fark had this yesterday by gelfling · · Score: 2, Funny

    Don't you people coordinate paid placements?

  8. Motorcycle as reviewed by an Interior Designer by cranos · · Score: 3, Funny

    Okay I read the review, and I couldn't help but feel the guy writing the review is either a budding art critic, or an interior decorator.

    Also I wonder how many people go to rubbermagazine.com and are a little disappointed when they get there.

  9. I need one by canofbutter · · Score: 3, Funny

    I commute in ~20 miles from a rural community and gas prices are rising excessively and the oil supply in general will be/is running low. This is therefore the perfect mode of transportation for North Dakota in the winter...

  10. lightweight by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The real problem with the bike's safety is its tiny weight: about the weight of the rider (80Kg/176lbs). Even a 300lb bike gets blown around by wind on, say, the SF Bay Bridge, has trouble hugging curves in mountain roads, and needs more acceleration to stay at speed despite drag. The other big momentum problem is that when a car hits you, you'll split the absorbed momentum equally with the ENV - while a heavier bike will absorb more momentum. As cars get heavier (SUVs etc), these collisions are really terrible mismatches for a bike, especially one which can't jet out of the way at higher speeds, due to limited top speed (50MPH).

    The ENV is really a big, quiet H2 scooter. The difference is really just in the marketing, but that creates the mindset in the rider. Ride it like a Harley, get squashed like a bug. Ride it like a Razor, and rule the road.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  11. refills? by dmf415 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now all we need to buy is our own hydrogen gas station to refill the tank, hmm?

  12. Drive By? by Crystalmonkey · · Score: 5, Funny

    The engine is completely silent, which might not go well with many motorcycle lovers. This sure would make a drive-by easy though. I hate it when they run...

  13. Core = power solution by BrookHarty · · Score: 5, Insightful

    They are using the bike as an example of what a CORE power system is, think if it as a big battery, you can take the battery out of your motorcycle and put it into your jet ski.

    But the battery is reusable, and can be used else where. Camping, Emergency Generators, vehicals, kids toys, etc.

    And as for the quiteness of them, new problems are only new challenges. Most people cant hear whats outside their car now, with the radio on, speaker phone, and kids crying in the back.

    Funny how quiet is a drawback, when I'm thinking quiet traffic is worth it. You dont jay-walk for a reason, now you dont hear the car hitting you, maybe its darwinism in realtime.

  14. Silent Harley Gang!! by E+IS+mC(Square) · · Score: 2

    Imagine watching a big Harley gang with big Harley people with big Harley clothes with big Harley expressions overtaking your Corolla - but the Harley engines are silent!!!

    mu ha ha ha ...

  15. no noise? not a hazard by tedtimmons · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Most modern, efficient vehicles are very quiet. I doubt most SUV drivers hear a Honda Civic next to them on freeway- even if they aren't on the phone or listening to the radio.

    Why is it any different with a motorcycle? Loud pipes annoy the rider and nearby pedestrians. The visibility issue with motorcycles is more a function of size than volume.

    -ted, motorcycling geek

  16. SF ENVy? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In the future, we'll all carry 2KW generators to power our local environments. Mobile devices, climate control, transport. Who knows - when the dollar collapses and oil runs out, maybe our currency will be denominated in Kjoules, which we trade for drinking water. The "Core" transportable fuelcell that powers the ENV is a step in that direction - we're always "in our cars", which transform around us by our needed functions. But I don't get it with this ENV. How is its motor "6KW", while its power supply outputs only 1KW? Is it really all science fiction?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:SF ENVy? by JimmehAH · · Score: 2, Informative

      It has a battery pack to provide 6KW to the motor when accelerating.

  17. As a motorcycle owner by bruciferofbrm · · Score: 5, Informative

    I have always wanted a quiter bike. I do not like the loud 'like at me' rumble (which may exceed legal limits in many places) that some riders seem to like.

    Now my 250cc Rebel (my firts bike) puts out 15 HP. So, an 8 HP bike might be a bit weeny for highway cruising, but this sounds like a great city bike.

    In terms of noise again, bicycles and even Segways make no (or very little) noise. Its not the pedestrian who has an issue. Its the driver.

    If its licensed like a standard Gas powered bike, then the driver knows the rules on riding and should not be endangering anyone.

    I applaud this and all the other cool alternative fuel bikes. My little bike gets 70 mpg, and my biggest get 35 mpg. Not bad compared to most cars people actually drive, but they still add to the pollutiuon level none the less.

  18. you miss the point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful


    50mph in London or for that matter any British city ? good luck with that between 7am-10pm

  19. Its the weight that concerns me. by Stone316 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    At 80kg, your not going to want to ride this on a windy day or the highway, even if they do increase the top speed.

    Even on my bike 500lbs I get tossed around alot on windy days... I wouldn't want to be on this bike if an 18 wheeler passed me on the highway.

    --
    "Thanks to the remote control I have the attention span of a gerbil."
    1. Re:Its the weight that concerns me. by ALeavitt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'd worry more on a highway about the bike's top speed of 50 than I would about the wind from a passing truck.

      --
      This sig has been stolen. Return it to its original user for a reward.
    2. Re:Its the weight that concerns me. by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 4, Funny

      I don't know. In Chicago, a top speed of 25 seems to be about all you'd need on the highways most days.

      --

      ---
      Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
      (I read with sigs off.)
    3. Re:Its the weight that concerns me. by harkabeeparolyn · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, but if you're ever in a highway accident on that Vespa, there won't be enough left of you to put in a taco. I appreciate you Messianic early adopters; I'm sure we'll all be riding around in or on energy efficient vehicles when oil prices get high enough. But until that day comes we will continue to make hamburger out of you on our highways.

    4. Re:Its the weight that concerns me. by whitetrashrobot · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Generally what really determines how much a motorcycle is affected by crosswinds (or passing trucks) is aerodynamics not the mass of the vehicle. I have a sport bike which weights less than 500lbs and I've never had any problems.

    5. Re:Its the weight that concerns me. by RollingThunder · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, but if you're ever in a highway accident on that Vespa, there won't be enough left of you to put in a taco.

      The situation is hardly better if on a motorcycle.

  20. Damn silent pedestrians by wsanders · · Score: 2, Funny

    And those damn pedestrians - totally silent!

    You'll hear me coming - I'm the one yelling "HEY ASS****!" at the car trying to hit me.

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
  21. huh? by MarcoAtWork · · Score: 4, Interesting

    although I mostly agree with the wind issue (I've experienced that a few times myself) I am not quite sure I understand the rest of your observations and I'd like to qualify the wind issue a bit more anyways.

    The wind is a problem if you happen to sit fairly high up on a motorbike with a big side profile (aka most 'high performance' road bikes). Even if said bike weighed a lot you'd probably still be moved around quite a bit as you go fast. The wind is a lot less of an issue on choppers since you're sitting way lower and they have way smaller side profiles.

    = has trouble hugging curves in mountain roads

    huh? What does weight have to do with anything when talking about cornering? You don't see MotoGP riders strapping anvils to their bikes to corner better, do you?

    = needs more acceleration to stay at speed despite drag.

    this doesn't make any sense: AFAIK the drag is proportional to the bike's frontal area, not to its weight.

    = while a heavier bike will absorb more momentum.

    if you collide with a car and you're on a motorbike you're going to be thrown off it whether or not the motorbike weighs 200lb or 500lb: most/all cars outweigh you by an order of magnitude anyways, and let's not even talk about SUVs.

    = these collisions are really terrible mismatches for a bike, especially one which can't jet out of the way at higher speeds

    most of the bike-car collisions I've seen/heard about couldn't be avoided by being able to accelerate or go faster: if that was the case there would be no accidents involving high performance road bikes, right?

    Personally I think this bike is perfect for European city commuting (since it's near silent and non-polluting odds are you'll be able to drive it in the city centres that are currently off-limits to mopeds and motorbikes) but won't really do much here in North America, although you might see the odd one around (like I've seen a S.M.A.R.T. car the other day, the likes of which you see way more often in Europe).

    The 80kph speed limit is about perfect as well, as traffic usually moves around at 50-70kph in town: my old moped was capable of hitting 60-65kph (on a good day, with some tailwind) and having an extra 20kph would be way more than enough for those times where traffic is moving faster than usual.

    --
    -- the cake is a lie
  22. Anybody else scared of... by KhaZ · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...harnessing the raw power of the sun between your legs?

    Eep.

    (From the article: "a bike ...could then be re-charged from a mini hydrogen creator, the size of a shoebox.")

    (Granted, not fusion, but still. Hinden-nads... Eep!)

    --
    - - - -

    KickingDragon

  23. Watch me Not Care (TM) by SuperBanana · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The engine is completely silent, which might not go well with many motorcycle lovers.

    Pardon my French, but fuck 'em (read till the end for why, I have a little explaining to do first).

    In my state (Massachusetts) a bunch of do-gooders are working on legislation to ban "aftermarket" exhaust systems on cars (and cars only) which are "louder" than the OEM systems. This was originally intended to stop all the idiots with Hondas from putting practically-open mufflers on their 4-bangers. Which IS really annoying.

    However, for people like me who own an older German car for which the exhaust system OEM costs about a bazillion dollars, pretty soon I won't be able to install a significantly cheaper exhaust system, simply because it is slightly louder than the original, and the original was dead quiet...or because I'd have to have it "tested" or the manufacturer would have to have it "certified".

    Meanwhile, some guy who thinks he's really Bad Ass (TM) gets to run COMPLETE STRAIGHT PIPES off his damn Harley that are so loud they make your chest pound. Or some college student on a crotch rocket puts mufflers on his bike that are so loud he sounds like an screaming F1 car. Nevermind none of these idiots have catalytic converters, and the damn things are little better than lawnmowers; most of them are still using carbs (yes, I know some "sport bikes" are now EFI, whatever, that's not the point). They're emissions -nightmares-, and while I have to have my car strapped to a dyno every 2 years, he barely has to have his blinkers checked.

    So, until that law applies to them (it does NOT) AND cops start holding motorcycles to EXISTING noise limits, don't you dare go telling me what I can/can't do with my car's exhaust...and certainly don't whine to me about how a fuel-cell bike makes no noise.

    Thank you. Yes, I am done.

    1. Re:Watch me Not Care (TM) by EulerX07 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Oh really! How interesting. Allow me to reference a few passage of the Hurt report for our readers' pleasure.

      14. Conspicuity of the motorcycle is a critical factor in the multiple vehicle accidents, and accident involvement is significantly reduced by the use of motorcycle headlamps (on in daylight) and the wearing of high visibility yellow, orange or bright red jackets.
      18. Conspicuity of the motorcycle is most critical for the frontal surfaces of the motorcycle and rider.

      I have a hunching feeling that even though you say you use straight pipes to get noticed, you care too much about looking like Jesse James to wear a high-visibility vest and actually protecting yourself as a rider. Also, your comment about having wind blow by your ears make me think you're one of those yahoos riding without an helmet (keep doing it, i'm fine with darwinism at work).

      So in conclusion, you ride a loud bike to look like a badass and try to impress others, not for your safety. That is all.

    2. Re:Watch me Not Care (TM) by Cycon · · Score: 2, Informative
      I bet if your stupid ass rode a bike you would have loud pipes as well. We have loud pipe so idiots much as yourself can damn sure hear us comming. I cannot tell you how many times I have narrowly escaped serious injury or death because somebody turned in front of me or ran me off the frigging road while changing lanes.

      You're way off. My ride's a GSX1200, stock pipes. The bike can pull 0-60 in 2.9 seconds, but its quiet enough to slip up behind someone at a crosswalk without their noticing from a meter away (when parking on the sidewalk and re-entering traffic).

      Problems with people changing lanes and not seeing you won't be fixed by louder volume - hell, you could wear a day-glo yellow reflective vest and still be missed. The only solution is to drive like everyone is constantly out to kill you.

      Its easier to fit into blindspots on bikes, and quite frankly people with cranked-up stereos who are speeding along trying to weave in and out of traffic are the ones that are going to nail you anyway .. they won't hear you no matter way. You're just doing damange to your ears.

      --
      Your Brain + EEG + LEGO Robots = Brainstorms
  24. Another Fool Cell by CasaDelGato · · Score: 3, Informative

    Wow, a Fuel Cell ($$$$) bike that has almost caught up with a pure Electric vehicle. Except that it's top speed is lower, it costs more to build, and is far more difficult to refuel. Yup, Fuel Cells are the future! The only reason Fuel Cells are being pushed so hard is that they retain the Big Company infrastructure needed to use them. You will need a large distribution network if you want to refuel lots of cars, AND you will need to produce all that hyrdrogen - which will likely be made from oil. EV's can do it now at lower cost than Fool Cells, but for some reason are being ignored. (Or actively discouraged - like GM crushing the quite nice EV1's.)

    1. Re:Another Fool Cell by CasaDelGato · · Score: 3, Informative

      Sorry, power plants have MUCH better exhaust scrubbers than cars do. I'm not near my references right now, but last I checked, the Well-to-Wheel efficiency of an EV was around 70mpg. Of course the Fool Cell vehicle will be considerably worse - which is what we are comparing to here - not ICE cars. Plus, there ARE other sources of electricity than oil. Admittedly, you do have to get used to a quiet vehicle and not changing the oil, and not stopping at gas stations.

  25. Aritfical Noise? by machinegunhand · · Score: 3, Funny

    The real problem here is that pedistrians are silent. I hate it when they sneak up on my car and jump out in front of me. If my ride is required to have lights and be noisy, then let's be fair. Why are foot travelers the only ones allowed to move about in stealth mode? Make the carless/bikeless among us wear noise making devices that indicate velocity (and maybe backup beepers too for reverse mode). I think this should apply to pets too.

  26. says who ? by C0vardeAn0nim0 · · Score: 2, Informative

    my 125cc honda XLR (check http://www.honda.com.br/ is a retired bike but they have a similar replacement) make 210km on 7 liters of gasoline, 30 km/l it weighs 110 kg (dry). with me + oil and fuel is about 185 kg. 30 km/l with a 12.5 hp engine at constant 80 km/h moving 180 kg, take note.

    my statio wagon is a 1200 kg volkswagen parati with a 1800cc engine produces 90 hp and at 80 km/h it does... 12 km/l.

    an engine 14 times bigger only needs twice the fuel to move a car 7 times the weight of the motorcicle.

    things get worse as the motorcicle engine gets bigger. a honda CB-400 with a 400cc engine does 15 km/l a CBR-7500 spends more than my car.

    whos "pretty damn fuel efficient" now ?

    --
    What ? Me, worry ?
  27. Am I the only one by 0x20 · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...who read the article and saw this: The CORE.. is a radically compact and efficient fuel cell, capable of powering anything from a motorboat to a small domestic property and thought, "Why would I want to drive a house around?"

  28. Chick magnet by hey! · · Score: 2, Funny

    It says rebel -- with a social conscience.

    Just the thing for picking up vegan babes at the PETA rally.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  29. Ninjas are sweet! They flip ou and just not care by TiggertheMad · · Score: 4, Funny

    In addition it could also possibly pose an interesting safety issue, since a pedestrian or motorist would not hear it coming.

    Yes, but the bike will be a huge smash hit with NINJAS!

    'My name is robert, and Ninjas are soooo sweet.'

    --

    HA! I just wasted some of your bandwidth with a frivolous sig!
  30. Re:loud pipes save lives by Jicksta · · Score: 2, Funny

    So let's just throw this fuel cell technology out the window.

    We've developed the technology to power engines on hydrogen, an element easily extractable from the most abundant substance on our planet, water, but the fact that these very engines are silent poses a safety issue!

    Oh well, we're just consumers. Who says we even have the right to spend less by not buying gasoline or even consider helping our planet by not polluting the air? The very thought!

  31. Silence is golden. by Domini · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I for one don't care much for people broadcasting the fact that they drive a motorcycle with a perpetuated engine fault (Harley).

    I think they should perhaps have speakers embedded into their helmets to blast their own ears away.
    -grin-

    I think some form of speaker system can be installed which will simulate some form of engine noise (Star Wars vehicles come to mind...) to help with the safety issue. Besides, the noise of some motorcycles prevent the rider from hearing others around them.

    I too drive a 3.0 litre Porsche 911 SC, and am painfully aware how bad it is for the environment (and my fuel budget). Fortunately event though my exhaust needs to be replaced (I almost sound as bad as a free-flow modified VW Beetle!) the car is totally silent within. (Pretty cool really)

    I'll miss the roar I think, but then again I'm all for viable (quasi-)electric vehicles.

  32. For those of us... by Dan+East · · Score: 2, Funny

    whose bikes travel faster than 761 mph, not being heard by people we are overtaking is already a big problem.

    Dan East

    --
    Better known as 318230.