I like the argument that “there will be a real risk of him being detained at Guantánamo Bay or elsewhere” - especially the "elsewhere" part. That could be anywhere, like a "regular jail."
No kidding. This is what happens when you’re arrested.
While we're at it, I'd like to see Shakespeare's work rewritten to remove those cruel jokes, many of which were made at a socioeconomically disadvantaged girl’s expense. I know he died 400 like years ago, but he should've known that stuff would would hurt someone's feelings, someday.
This is covered by the latest version of the bill: The government shall fine those who do not contribute to the collective beer fund.
Like you, I also fought for this right, although I can't possibly be expected to pay for it myself in this economy.
It may have nothing to do with socialism, but the behavior isn't uncommon amongst authoritarian (and often delusional) socialist leaders. As for your point about distracting from the "real point" by mentioning economics: It is most certainly related to economics in the sense that the marketplace is always subjected to a very high level of government control in a socialist market economy.
Yellowstone National Park has the same problem, only it's many thousand times more problematic for the region. Even lake shorelines have been altered due to the rising crust.
.."statistics show the planet to be increasingly unsafe"..
Um, I grew up watching Land of the Lost. Based on my observations, it's safer now. Much safer.
How is this going to work? When the cops show up to make sure you still have the tag on your matress they'll also inspect your printer cartridges to make sure they haven't been refilled?
..but to see this from PayPal is blatent highway robery. Granted, there is misuse of their system, constantly as far as I can tell. But without being held to accout on acts such as these, they're no better than the ones who commit fraud in the first place.
Rehnquist was a hard working man who took his job very seriously. For him, the time of hearing deliberations is over now and I hope whoever replaces him on the court will follow in his footsteps.
Yes, indeed you must be careful. Anyone who's ever watched Gilligan's Island knows there's a lost tribe of headhunting canibals out there somewhere, just waiting for some well-meaning city folks to wander into their territory.
Just as in most day to day life experiences, the sense of smell could be used for navigation. For some of us, it already comes in handy with regards to sensing the presence of Windows.
My question is simple? Regardless of the outcome or by-products, if hacking into someone else's system moral?
This is not a troll. It is an honest question that gets to the heart of the matter.
The blame should be placed on the destructive behavior of hackers. Those who believe that they're actually doing society a favor are wrong.
Sure, hackers "encourage" us to create more secure systems. And when phrased this way, we see their actions as "good" and "progressive."
But consider this logic as applied to other issues in our society: Criminals encourage us to create better laws. Sexually promiscuous people help us realize the need for better medicine for treating symptoms of sexually transmitted diseases. Thieves create an itch, and better home security systems help scratch it.
See, it's wrong to defend the immoral behavior that leads us down this road. Criminals are not to thank for making this world a better place.
Slashdot Mirror
I like the argument that “there will be a real risk of him being detained at Guantánamo Bay or elsewhere” - especially the "elsewhere" part. That could be anywhere, like a "regular jail." No kidding. This is what happens when you’re arrested.
...in much the same way that video killed the radio star.
While we're at it, I'd like to see Shakespeare's work rewritten to remove those cruel jokes, many of which were made at a socioeconomically disadvantaged girl’s expense. I know he died 400 like years ago, but he should've known that stuff would would hurt someone's feelings, someday.
Moore's Law will eventually find itself to be a construct, which will lead to its own dissolution.
This is covered by the latest version of the bill: The government shall fine those who do not contribute to the collective beer fund. Like you, I also fought for this right, although I can't possibly be expected to pay for it myself in this economy.
It may have nothing to do with socialism, but the behavior isn't uncommon amongst authoritarian (and often delusional) socialist leaders. As for your point about distracting from the "real point" by mentioning economics: It is most certainly related to economics in the sense that the marketplace is always subjected to a very high level of government control in a socialist market economy.
And the first hangover was 4999 years, 364 days ago.
Yellowstone National Park has the same problem, only it's many thousand times more problematic for the region. Even lake shorelines have been altered due to the rising crust.
Does this mean I can get out of my MS EULA now?
.."statistics show the planet to be increasingly unsafe".. Um, I grew up watching Land of the Lost. Based on my observations, it's safer now. Much safer.
That works out to be about $130 per secret.
How is this going to work? When the cops show up to make sure you still have the tag on your matress they'll also inspect your printer cartridges to make sure they haven't been refilled?
Bill Gates began dreaming of "pay-per-click" the first time he saw a mouse in action.
..but to see this from PayPal is blatent highway robery. Granted, there is misuse of their system, constantly as far as I can tell. But without being held to accout on acts such as these, they're no better than the ones who commit fraud in the first place.
Rehnquist was a hard working man who took his job very seriously. For him, the time of hearing deliberations is over now and I hope whoever replaces him on the court will follow in his footsteps.
Balmer's not indexed, is he?
I just knew naming my first born son "Google" was a bad idea!
oh yeah, MS Army v0.95 in beta. Never mind.
...the rover finally responded to Nasa's question with "because it was there."
Yes, indeed you must be careful. Anyone who's ever watched Gilligan's Island knows there's a lost tribe of headhunting canibals out there somewhere, just waiting for some well-meaning city folks to wander into their territory.
Just as in most day to day life experiences, the sense of smell could be used for navigation. For some of us, it already comes in handy with regards to sensing the presence of Windows.
My question is simple? Regardless of the outcome or by-products, if hacking into someone else's system moral? This is not a troll. It is an honest question that gets to the heart of the matter.
The blame should be placed on the destructive behavior of hackers. Those who believe that they're actually doing society a favor are wrong.
Sure, hackers "encourage" us to create more secure systems. And when phrased this way, we see their actions as "good" and "progressive."
But consider this logic as applied to other issues in our society: Criminals encourage us to create better laws. Sexually promiscuous people help us realize the need for better medicine for treating symptoms of sexually transmitted diseases. Thieves create an itch, and better home security systems help scratch it.
See, it's wrong to defend the immoral behavior that leads us down this road. Criminals are not to thank for making this world a better place.
Maybe for a blind person, but anyone who likes natural daylight would be out of luck. No windows on subs. That's why they run into things sometimes.
...just wait until you try finding something decent to watch.