Slashdot Mirror


Amazon Pursues Plogging Patent

theodp writes "When it unveiled a beta of Plogs (personalized blogs), a nonpublication request Amazon had in effect prevented the USPTO from disclosing that Plogs were patent-pending. But now you can check out Amazon's patent application for the Personalized selection and display of user-supplied content to enhance browsing of electronic catalogs, which describes how 'blurbs' can be made available in a blog format for viewing by others."

110 comments

  1. Hang on! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Aren't all blogs personalised?

    1. Re:Hang on! by seven+of+five · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's a distinction without a difference.
      What's next?
      Pell-Phones - Cell phones that have their own personalized number!!

    2. Re:Hang on! by northcat · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      RTFA.

    3. Re:Hang on! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but a phone service that recommended other people for you to call based upon your calling history might be patentable. Wait second, that idea is stupid enough that it might just work, with proper marketing of course ... This is way better than a jump to conclusions mat.

  2. Comments? by Dogers · · Score: 2, Funny

    It seems Slashdot will soon owe royalties to Amazon..

    --
    I am a viral sig. Please copy me and help me spread. Thank you.
    1. Re:Comments? by pbranes · · Score: 1, Funny

      Well, the link requires a single click to view - Amazon already owns a patent on that, so pay up Slashdot!

  3. First Thought No Way, but maybe... by WebHostingGuy · · Score: 1

    My first thought is no way, this is so obvious. But then I got thinking--if the process of selecting individualized blogs is the true patent (basically selecting items for different individuals based upon viewing past history, etc.) then I might see this being upheld. Usually when you do have a process though you will see the word "process" somewhere. It will be interesting if they leave the patent like this or seek to further clarify.

    --
    Quality Hosting e3 Servers
    1. Re:First Thought No Way, but maybe... by PyWiz · · Score: 1, Funny

      Excuse me, but I have patented the process of posting individualized comments based on past reading of a slashdot article. Please cease and desist all posting activity until we can work out a licensing arrangement.

      --
      -py
    2. Re:First Thought No Way, but maybe... by WebHostingGuy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I recognize your patent and will promptly terminate my post. However, I have patented the process of "replying" to a posted individualized comment posted under your patent, there for you are in violation and must terminate your post.

      --
      Quality Hosting e3 Servers
  4. Just to be clear here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    They dont seem to be patenting blogging, even the livejournal/xanga kind.

    There basically patenting showing other users favorite for similar things on a search page at a shopping site. they are not patenting blogging.

  5. Wait .. don't you mean by z0ink · · Score: 1, Funny

    Pogs?

    --
    Steal This Sig
    1. Re:Wait .. don't you mean by J+Barnes · · Score: 1

      I'm still looking for the Steve Allen Pog.

    2. Re:Wait .. don't you mean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      have some rare OJ 'slammers' featuring the 'star' behind bars

      anyone care for a swap?
      would like to slam with barbarella.

    3. Re:Wait .. don't you mean by BJH · · Score: 1

      The site is almost certainly incorrect in saying that the game originated on Maui in the 1920s. It seems to be a variant of "menko" (or "pacchin"/"pettan", onomatopaeic words for the sound of a card hitting the ground), a children's game from Japan. It was probably taken from Japan to Hawaii by immigrants in the 1920s. Here's an illustrated page showing the Japanese version, and here's another page that supports the Japanese origin of the game.

  6. RSS feeds :-) by CSMastermind · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well I'm not sure if the patent will be approved as is but I must admit that I like to idea behind the service. Most notably I enjoy the RSS feed integration, that's something that more people really need to start using. As for the patent, seems alittle broad to me but that's why you need to get these things approved.

    1. Re:RSS feeds :-) by RedLaggedTeut · · Score: 1

      Yea, we really need RSS, because it is much too much effort to click on the bookmark to slashdot or other fav' sites to get to the news.

      Not to mention the scaling problem by folk's browsers requesting RSS content even when they don't read it. Much like running your TV while doing something else.

      I mean RSS is great for cross-site syndication, but it is not really cool for personal access.

      --
      I'm still trying to figure out what people mean by 'social skills' here.
    2. Re:RSS feeds :-) by mattspammail · · Score: 2, Insightful

      RSS is one of the greatest things to come out in recent history. (I daresay even better than "plogs")

      The whole purpose of RSS is so that you don't have to visit all of those sites, unless something catches your eye. XML kicks ass, even though it's a wee bit bloated. I have about 10 sites' RSS feeds on my MyYahoo page, and I cannot live without it now. If Google would give me an easy way to do it, I'd probably switch to that. Either way, my RSS content is what I WANT to view from sites that I WANT to monitor.

      If you were trolling, I fell for it. If you were being straight up, you're an idiot.

      --
      Now accepting PayPal donations!
    3. Re:RSS feeds :-) by jp10558 · · Score: 1

      I'm not trolling, but I have to admit I don't get RSS. What exactly DOES it do? Why would I want it?

      Sounds like yet another client/module that I would have to have running and learn how to use.

      --
      Opera, Proxomitron-Grypen,GPG 0x0A1C6EE3
    4. Re:RSS feeds :-) by mattspammail · · Score: 1

      RSS is a standard form of XML that has been adopted. What it allows the parent site to do is publish and update an XML document that has article summaries that can include title, time, summary, link, etc. to their own web site.

      Then when someone like me comes along and enters the URL for the RSS document into either an RSS reader or site like My Yahoo, it will take the content of the RSS document and display it using the format of My Yahoo or the RSS reader. Unlike HTML, RSS (and XML) is strictly for the transfer of data, not for the display of data. The display of the data is handled by the end user's client app.

      When I go to My Yahoo, I now have 8-10 sections of RSS feeds. Each one has the site title, 5-10 article summaries, including the time of posting, a link to the real article, and a short summary. That way, I can view the news from my favorite sites all in one place and click on only the articles I actually feel like reading. It's a time saver, for sure. It keeps me from surfing and getting distracted. I have feeds from the likes of Slashdot, BoingBoing, Fark, Anandtech, Silicon.com, Wired, and various AP feeds. They all show up in My Yahoo, and they all have the same look and feel as any other module from My Yahoo (for better or worse). Anyone who has ever visited Fark or BoingBoing knows that their banner ads aren't good to have on your monitor during work.

      Too much typing. Fingers hurt. Gotta go.

      --
      Now accepting PayPal donations!
    5. Re:RSS feeds :-) by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      RSS is good for pumping down undates about a product too, the government telling companies that a law is about to change and affect their business, or the government actually advertising consultations for a change.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    6. Re:RSS feeds :-) by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      Does my RSS feed work? it looks ok but all the readiers I've tried either only shoe me my CV or choke.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    7. Re:RSS feeds :-) by RedLaggedTeut · · Score: 1

      If you were trolling, I fell for it. If you were being straight up, you're an idiot.

      Well, at least I am straight.

      My site visiting behaviour does not match yours:

      Either I will be heavily procrastinating, in that case I will visit most sites anyway even without RSS preview, or I will be working under a spell of concentration, in which case no site will be able to distract me, except maybe the one or two sites which I know to have fresh quality content every day, and there would be no benefit in having these mixed in with the rest.

      I also can't find the RSS option in my localized version of yahoo, and I wonder whether you are really talking about syndication where you can select standard RSS only, which also has the benefit that the RSS information can be cached by the server.

      --
      I'm still trying to figure out what people mean by 'social skills' here.
    8. Re:RSS feeds :-) by Arrrggghhh · · Score: 1

      Overly broad would be a gross overstatement ... obvious ideas are not susposed to receive patent recognition.

    9. Re:RSS feeds :-) by STrinity · · Score: 1

      Yea, we really need RSS, because it is much too much effort to click on the bookmark to slashdot or other fav' sites to get to the news.

      RSS is, for all intents and purposes, a bookmark, just to an XML file instead of HTML. It also has the advantage of letting you see if a site's been updated without opening it. That may not sound like a big time-saver, but it's halved (at least) the amount of time I spend surfing the web.

      Not to mention the scaling problem by folk's browsers requesting RSS content even when they don't read it.

      If a site puts full articles in the feed, it can actually save on bandwidth since an RSS feed is a lot smaller than most webpages.

      --
      Les Miserables Volume 1 now up with my reading of
    10. Re:RSS feeds :-) by STrinity · · Score: 1

      I'm not trolling, but I have to admit I don't get RSS. What exactly DOES it do?

      Many sites nowadays, especially blogs, have an XML file that lists recent articles. You copy the lociation of the XML file into an RSS reader and set it to check for updates every so often. Then, when you want to surf the web, instead of going to two dozen sites and finding that half of them haven't been updated, you just look at your feed-list, find the sites that have been updated, click on one, and then scan the list of new articles for ones that interest you.

      If RSS has one flaw, it makes web surfing too efficient to be a proper time-waster.

      --
      Les Miserables Volume 1 now up with my reading of
  7. Blurb authoring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    The method of claim 15, wherein receiving a plurality of blurbs comprises receiving blurbs generates using a blurb authoring pipeline provided in association with the electronic catalog.

    It sounds like they are talking out of their blurb authoring pipeline

    1. Re:Blurb authoring by UncleJimbo · · Score: 1

      The method of claim 15, wherein receiving a plurality of marklars comprises receiving marklars generates using a marklar authoring pipeline provided in association with the electronic catalog. Wasn't that taken straight out of a South Park script?

  8. Plogging by mfh · · Score: 2, Funny

    So this is the age when we change a letter of an already annoying idea, patent it, and sue everyone who infringes? Soon I will patent this new idea I had called pife -- it's when you are born, live and grow up, become a productive member of society -- but it's different than life because it's more personal and it's branded with my own special logo, and ongoing product placement using cranial implants.

    Soon you will all bow to me!

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    1. Re:Plogging by oconnorcjo · · Score: 1

      I am still boycotting amazon for thier one click patent and then sueing barnes and nobles with it. I remember when a lot of people were against them. I still am. They just haven't sued anybody lately because after the one click ordeal, they got Borders to give them thier online portal. Maybe also because they are more profitable of late.

      --
      I miss the Karma Whores.
    2. Re:Plogging by FullMetalAlchemist · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      .. and we will all be banging your pife. ;)

    3. Re:Plogging by nacturation · · Score: 1, Funny

      Forget this whole plog thing. Who wants a personal log? I'm going to patent the group logging feature, aka glogging. My next step is to integrate a full search engine so people can look for relevant glogs. This search service will be called gloggle. So after gloggling your friends and posting in your glog, you can all head down to the pub for some grog.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    4. Re:Plogging by BJH · · Score: 2, Funny

      You mean you can glug your grog with your gloggled group of glogging... er... friends?

      (OK, OK, so I couldn't think of a synonym for "friends" that began with a G. So sue me.)

    5. Re:Plogging by alexandreracine · · Score: 1

      I have patended Kblog! You mixt up a Keg with blog! Results are sure to go down and back up.

      And it does not run on KDE...

      --
      No sig for now.
    6. Re:Plogging by nacturation · · Score: 1

      What a tongue twister... say "The gloggle gang glugged grog and glogged" five times in a row really fast.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    7. Re:Plogging by BorgCopyeditor · · Score: 1
      say "The gloggle gang glugged grog and glogged" five times in a row really fast.

      No, thanks. It's more fun to say galang-alang-alang-a.

      --
      Shop as usual. And avoid panic buying.
  9. New composite words and give me a stredach by FidelCatsro · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No entry found for plogging.

    Did you mean plugging?

    yes these new words annoys me , but what annoys me more is companys trying to get stupid patents ,
    "According to a note on Amazon.com, the Plog is a diary-type feature of the users' shopping experience. "]It will help] you discover products that have just been released, track changes to your orders, and many other things. Just like a blog, your Plog is sorted in reverse chronological order. When we think we have something interesting or important to tell you, we'll post it to your Plog.""

    So its an information system based on your previous purchases, Im sure many catlog order companys have been doing this for years , with target special offers etc .
    Plus im sure several advertising companys have with tracking cookies and other forms of spyware , been doing the same thing to provide ads that may intrest the customer/victim

    --
    The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    1. Re:New composite words and give me a stredach by eclectro · · Score: 1

      So its an information system based on your previous purchases, Im sure many catlog order companys have been doing this for years

      Yeah, but because it's the internets, it's special.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    2. Re:New composite words and give me a stredach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, I think Vons, etal, have been doing pretty much just this when you swipe you saver card and they give you some coupons with your reciept based on recent purchases.

      This stuff just reaffirms folks already low oponion of the typical GS employee in the USPatent Office.

      Me

  10. Have you seen my.... by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

    ...Plog?

    I hope this word doesn't catch on... otherwise it'll cause almost as much confusion as spelling out orally the slashdot URL.

    1. Re:Have you seen my.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plog... sounds like something you flush down the toilet

  11. It's dejavu all over again .. by GNUALMAFUERTE · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    We are seing articles about patent applications at least once a week.
    We have another potencial litigious bastard here, but, what do we gain by saying the same stuff each time we see such a story? (and beleive me, you will se a lot more in the future)
    Just add this to your /etc/hosts file:

    127.0.0.1 www.amazon.com
    127.0.0.1 amazon.com

    Don't buy anything from them, don't recommend amazon to friends, don't keep a wishlist, don't even go to the frkn site, don't click on banners, etc,etc.

    It's the only way we can fight them.

    --
    WTF am I doing replying to an AC at 5 A.M on a Friday night?
  12. This is why I'm still boycotting Amazon by jamie · · Score: 3, Interesting
    It's a pain to buy through other vendors, since typically their websites suck by comparison, but -- this is why I'm still boycotting Amazon. Even the FSF gave up long ago, but Amazon's patent-hungry approach still just seems wrong to me, and I don't like rewarding corporations like that.

    Amazon is really pushing its APIs to open-source developers and is trying very hard to become part of the open-source community. Jeff Bezos and Tim O'Reilly sat side by side at OSCON to tout how small developers could use Amazon's API to make lots of money. This worries me.

    1. Re:This is why I'm still boycotting Amazon by null+etc. · · Score: 1
      I interviewed with Amazon last year, despite the fact that I hate patents all to hell, and Amazon is a patent whore.

      All I can say is that many of their team members spend all day thinking about how to improve customer experience, which is great. But unfortunately for the rest of the world, those ideas turn into patents which then no one else can use.

      I agree that Amazon ought to be rewarded for the amount of innovation they produce, but it seems that they already are being rewarded by a high percentage of loyal customers.

    2. Re:This is why I'm still boycotting Amazon by 1_interest_1 · · Score: 1

      I have a question.

      Has a company ever been successfully boycotted, where success means the company saw a significant drop in their bottom line?

    3. Re:This is why I'm still boycotting Amazon by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      While I commend you for sticking to your principles, if you were to boycott all companies that patent even just software, you'd fast run out of companies to do business with. Even Apple has some very dubious patents, and IBM is almost a patent factory.

  13. Next Up by eclectro · · Score: 5, Funny


    Amazon combines Plogs, Reviews, and One-Click and gets a patent on Prick.

    --
    Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
  14. Concepts by northcat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They are patenting concepts. They are not even patenting theories or ways to implement concepts, they are patenting concepts. It's like patenting the very concept of a flying car itself, instead of patenting an implementation of the concept.

    1. Re:Concepts by back_pages · · Score: 1
      The US patent system was specifically designed so that the inventor would have the broadest protection he can grab. If you invented the concept of flying cars and disclosed how to build and use a flying car, then it is your Constitutional right to define your invention as "a car that can fly" if the prior art fails to teach it.

      Additionally, I think you would enjoy reading about "constructive reduction to practice" compared to "actual reduction to practice". The former is quickly defined as documentation that complies with 35 USC 112 (ie contains enough information that a person in that technology could make and use the invention) while the latter is a demonstration of a working example, such as a prototype, model, or in many cases, source code. A rather broad consensus holds that requiring actual reduction to practice for a patent application obscenely favors corporations with mountains of disposable capital at the expense of the little guy, so it's a pretty good requirement if you're trying to support the huge corporations and shaft the independent innovators.

      The flip side of that is that a patent application can't be so vague or filled with middle-management jargon that you can't figure out what it is. Unfortunately for software-related inventions, this isn't a hard requirement to fill. The stereotypical condescending intellectualism that surrounds computer science bites itself in the ass here - part of proving that an application is not sufficient reduction to practice would involve getting an expert in software engineering to swear in an affidavit that he cannot make the invention as it is described. If his ego-inflated head doesn't explode, you might be getting somewhere, but the chances of this happening and working in court are really slim.

      Unfortunately for that argument, I can pretty well figure out what a "plog" is and how it works just by reading the jokes made here on Slashdot. I don't need to see source code nor do I need to read a specification to build and use a plog of my own. This is in line with your observation - they aren't describing a specific implementation of anything; they're talking about a really broad, very basic idea. But God love'em, if they came up with it, then they can claim patent protection for the whole idea. Unfortunately for them, describing and patenting a broad concept isn't very easy to litigate. It often prevents infringement of -exactly- what is claimed, but basically -anything- could be construed as an improvement.

      Here's some recommended reading:
      MPEP 2138.05
      MPEP 2164.08

  15. There was no nonpublication request by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There couldn't have been a nonpublication request for two reasons:

    1. Obviously the patent application is published...we're all looking at it. The filing date is August 2004 and the publication date is February 2005. That's 18 months, which is exactly the the correct schedule for publication of an applications.

    2. Anyone who submits a nonpublication request with a patent application has to certify that they don't intend to file the application outside the United States. Certainly, Amazon wants to protect their "invention" world-wide. Thus they would never file a nonpublication request.

    1. Re:There was no nonpublication request by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correction--the filing date is August 2003

  16. Ok, so who else read that as "plogging PLatent"?! by The_REAL_DZA · · Score: 0

    I hereby nominate that article title for "tongue twister of the day"

    --


    This space intentionally left (almost) blank.
  17. We should patent the process not the idea... by vhogemann · · Score: 3, Interesting
    This way, for exemple, one should be alowed to patent the code to achieve certain functionality... but not the functionality itself.

    I think its more fair... Medicines for one, a Lab should be able to patent a process to achieve certain compound. But not be able to patent the compound formula... if some poor country find a way to produce the medicine, the Lab would not be alowed to charge for royalities... unless they're using the patented process to make the medicines.

    Take a look at the HIV case here at Brasil, the governament tried to produce generic medicines, to distribute among the population for FREE, but the Labs couldnt allow that, and sued the governament. When the Labs were about to LOOSE the case, they lowered the price of the meds to a fraction of the original cost, so would be cheaper for the governament to buy the meds, instead of produce them!!!

    What I mean is, patents doesnt suck. What is wrong is the way theyre used nowdays.

    --
    ---- You know how some doctors have the Messiah complex - they need to save the world? You've got the "Rubik's" complex
    1. Re:We should patent the process not the idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In terms of drug formulation, it is the process that gets approval. If you change the process, then there is no guarantee that exactly the same drug will be produced, and so it has to undergo new trials.

      This means that there is less demand for chemical engineers in a pharmaceutical plant than there is in a similar sized plant in say petrochemicals - you can't change the process to optimise production.

    2. Re:We should patent the process not the idea... by oliverthered · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I already give people things based on there history.

      e.g. When I'm down the pub I know what beers my friends drink, and if they are drinking something different tonight.

      I also know what new papers many friends read and what they are interested in taking about.

      How can anyone be granted a patent for this (or even consider putting one forward)

      Lets, use the word gossip instead of blurbs.

      An electronic catalog system provides an interface for users to author and post pieces of content, referred to as gossip The gossip submitted by a particular author are made available for viewing in an any format you like.
      gossip may also be obtained from external sources, such as the post man, or a news paper.

      A personalized gossip selection component selects gossip to present to users based on histories of catalog items selected by such users, and/or based on various other criteria.

      We call this the postman.
      The gossip selected for a particular user are presented within a personal log or "plog," which may be updated daily and will typically contain entries from many different authors.

      We call this the bartender.

      User feedback provided on specific gossip is taken into consideration by the personalized gossip selection algorithms.

      We call this the mothers meeting.

      Looks like Amazon is patenting the wheel.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    3. Re:We should patent the process not the idea... by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      It depends where you are.

      Drug companies take out patents all the way through the trial process, it's a fairly low risk business.

      Patent a drug, try it out doesn't work, patent a new drug.

      Patent a drug, try it out, works, patent a more efficient way of making the drug, human trials, patent making the drug in bulk, advertise on FOX.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    4. Re:We should patent the process not the idea... by enjo13 · · Score: 1

      It's patenting of processes that is entirely the problem. Patents, on their own, are not neccesarily a bad thing (provided the 'obviousness' test is being applied properly). Patenting of end products provides a developer of a product the chance to fully recoup their investment into the formulation of that product. It makes sense.

      However, patenting of processes is something far more insidious. When you patent a process you are granted much broader powers. Now you not only own a end-product, but the steps it takes to get there. There are likely hundreds of other products that can be developed by utilizing similiar parts of the process, but those are blocked by process level patents. This has the net effect of not only allowing patent holders to profit from their inventions, but prevents new inventions from ever making it off the drawing board.

      Its not accident that the two areas of patent law most consistently failing are process based. Software patents are almost always some kind of process patent (I used this algorithm to achieve this result). Business model patents (as their name implies) are almost always protecting a process (such as EBay's auction patents).

      Producing medicines in poorer countries is one of those really difficult issues. Simply allowing others to produce the same medicine at a lower cost defeats the purpose of the patent system in the first place. Subverting the patent system will have the net effect of putting the medical research industry out of commision. They depend on patents to insure that the millions they sink into research and development and they need some method of recouping those costs. We WANT them producing and researching new medications, without them our most productive medical research would go away. We also want those available to those who need them. It's just a hard problem.

      --
      Turn s60 photos into awesome videos with mScrapbook for all S60 3rd edition phones!
    5. Re:We should patent the process not the idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another problem with the current patent system...

      To obtain a patent, you are not required to prove that you actually built or implemented the idea that you are patenting.

      So the patent obtainer is encouraged to make many claims, in the broadest possible way. Even though they may actually be hopeless at making or implementing the thing being claimed! In fact, they may have no idea how to build it or lack the economic means. Then they can wait until someone more clever than them comes along, who can actually implement or build the thing that was patented, and who solves all of the practical problems. Then they sue!

      An earlier poster mentioned the Selden patent on the motor car (#549,160 year 1895). It seems like a very interesting story. From what I read, Selden the "inventor" was a patent lawyer and never even built one car, it seems. Being a skilled lawyer, he managed to string-out the application date by 16 years, giving him a further 17 years for the patent to have effect (and the auto industry to grow). All manufacturers (who could actually *build* cars) had to license his patent because it covered essential ideas used for all cars, except Ford who refused and was sued. Ford eventually won after a long legal battle because one of the patent claims was too specific.

  18. Quick question by phunkphorce · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I am the leader of an open-source (GPL) effort to create a truly multi-user and multi-blog blogging tool built on PHP and called pLog. Even though it's an ugly name, it stands "PHP Log" and has nothing to do with Amazon's patent whatsoever. But the question is... Should we start worrying about this now? I mean, can we expect Amazon's lawyers coming after us because our project name and the name of their patent sound too similar? We've been in Sourceforge since June 2003 (if that counts)

    We'd like to keep our name because it's been our identity for almost 2 years now but we cannot affort legal litigation (being a free community effort, etc)

    1. Re:Quick question by eluusive · · Score: 2, Funny
      1. Send Amazon a Cease and Desist letter :)
      2. Make website about it, post it on slashdot
      3. ????
      4. Profit!!!
    2. Re:Quick question by njen · · Score: 1

      Rememeber as we found out earlier, the '????' in step 3 is actually 'Sue'.

    3. Re:Quick question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would consider contacting The Software Freedom Law Center (SFLC) which provides legal representation and other law related services to protect and advance FOSS.

      Their url is: http://www.softwarefreedom.org

      They at least should be able to point you to someone who can help you protect your rights.

      Best regards

      Einar Petersen, Project Manager - http://globability.org

    4. Re:Quick question by jkabbe · · Score: 1

      You're probably going to run into problems. Not because of the patent application, but because of the trademark. Amazon has a trademark application in on the term that sounds very similar to what you are using the term for.

      http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state =o n881u.2.1

      You may be looking at a name change soon. Good luck!

    5. Re:Quick question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't you claim 'prior art'?? I mean how can a company patent a term that someone else is already using?

  19. My patents by ZehFernando · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'd like to announce that I've patented the following technologies, and everybody who makes use of such concepts must now pay me an annual fee starting ar $500,000 per year.

    WLOG (TM)
    A whining blog. Log in, bitch all day about traffic/technology/your boyfriend/your tatoo/your parents/your friends/school. Under this new concept, users will be able to whine more fast and more effectivelly than ever, thanks to our Instant-Whine(TM) technology that allows for up-to-the-second bitching about the upcoming issues.

    SLOG (TM)
    The server blog. With this breakthrough concept, now servers (and other applications) themselves can write blogs about what's happening to them. We find this kind of blog will be most interesting to system administrators and aficcionados alike. You'll fully understand the advantages of this system when you read your server's SLOG (TM) and find entries such as "I'm feeling bored today. I took 10.6231 seconds to process the last data backup. I had to rewrite 12731312kb of old files in the process. Those people can't create new files or what?".

    DLOG (TM)
    The dead blog. Create once, never post anymore. We think we can make big bucks with this tech, as most blogs effectively become a DLOG sooner or later. With our post lock feature, you can force your own blog to become a DLOG (TM) and never be able to post on it anymore.

    SPLOG (TM)
    The spam fest blog. This is actually an improved version of DLOG (TM); it not only makes your blog dead, but also leave comments open for comment spammers so they can build up their google rankings. Enjoy having thousands of posts about free onl1ne poker, v1agra and pen1s enlargement on your 6-words "I'm feeling bored" post.

    This is just a preview of the many technologies we're creating that enable YOU - the user - to blog more effectively than ever. Stay tooned for several new exciting releases in the future.

  20. New portmanteau words make my head hurt by kahei · · Score: 5, Funny


    'plogging'?? This is the sort of gratuseless neologism that's making modern webontent so incomprusing. Why can't they use ordular, regdinary words that we've all heard of? Why must they inventorate these mad brandologues, taking the initialet of a well-known verbagos and sticking it haprandom onto a pointuculous wundragubbin?

    This frumblotionary addlepoopery is threatening to grurmstipth crumbobblious fremd eebree zorn frell completely and utterly INCOMPREHENSIBLE.

    --
    Whence? Hence. Whither? Thither.
    1. Re:New portmanteau words make my head hurt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Selfness couldn't foragate applicendise with volumating vigortisation.

      Pendulating that concurrence does, however, renderthink with unique nomenmaking in their functionzone.

      Although, I must say that I would be proximal to disconcert in that respect.

    2. Re:New portmanteau words make my head hurt by micromoog · · Score: 1

      +1, Cromulent

  21. I'm just stunned by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This has got to be one of the most ridiculous things I've seen an application for. It's bad enough they patent "one click" shopping...but now this? This is way too broad and seems like it would impact all forms of portal-like applications. Wiki, Blogs, etc.

  22. It's the Grammar, Stupid by handy_vandal · · Score: 1

    Amazon is in the business of Selling Things.

    "Sell" is a verb.

    "Things" are nouns.

    Verbs and nouns. Amazon is in the Verbs and Nouns business.

    Conclusion: Amazon should simply patent "Verbs" and "Nouns". That would cut to the heart of the matter, eh?

    -kgj

    --
    -kgj
  23. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  24. aside from the requirement that patent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    applications and descriptive test be in english, it's a lod of CRAP.

    Since when do process patents cover style?

    Copyright the code, sure. But patent a combination of cuffs, collars, sleeves, etc that results in zoot suits? The fashion industry would kill for patents like this...

  25. Plogs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Plogs - (P)atented b(log)

  26. Lots of examples to break this by mattr · · Score: 4, Informative

    I designed a system called MyNet for users to send email to a system that would add entries to a personal diary page. circa 1995. This was not in production though I made a proof of concept and manually updated a blog (web nikki or diary) in 1995 online for a designer named hachiya, who designed sony's pink bear.

    David Blair's waxweb system (also about the same time) also should break parts of this as it included an advanced system allowing users to add annotations to a movie that is broken up into scenes, and edit the movie.

    I think if you take apart the patent line by line you will find lots of things that beat it piece by piece, and some which have more than one piece. I don't buy it that these guys invented blogging.

    For example Wiki's are based circa 1994 on work from the 80's.

    It looks more like the patent describes some things that have been around a while, and some already established techniques to extend them. Maybe some good development in there but not the originality as far as I can see from Amazon to be worth a patent. Not if it is circa 2003.

    Anyway, I'm against software patents in general since they seem to act opposite from the way patents are supposed to act, but the main thing here is that if there is going to be such a thing as a software patent it better be something more revolutionary and less obvious to experts in the field at the time, than what they have. I'm tired of seeing "software patents" for things that ought to be laughed out of the patent office if they were based on the physical world. And then you get more into mathematical / algorithmic discoveries which are not patentable for even better (similar) reasons. I wish Amazon would fuck off. They have enough of the fucking pie.

  27. the other problem with "plog"... by frankie · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...is that IT'S ALREADY A WORD.

    Plog is short for "plastic clog" (as in shoe). You'll see them quite often in hospitals because they're comfortable for standing and very easy to disinfect.

  28. phoenix - firefox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no doubt you'll get accused of passing off if you have any sort of popularity with this project even tho you were doing it long before this became public and despite any relavency to the amazon stuff, "but your honour, it's BRAND confusion, and people are stupid!! where's our money?" :(

  29. Re:Yea yea... by xSauronx · · Score: 3, Insightful
    he makes a good point....i dont send letters to the patent office telling them theyre doing a lousy job, and i dont send letters to my congressmen telling them the patent office needs revamping....or destruction or whatever you call it ;)

    How many of us do something other than discuss it on slashdot, and dont bother communicating with the people who can actually change it? It's not as though many people (if any) here are running for office that could change things like this: so who is?

    --
    By and large, language is a tool for concealing the truth. -- George Carlin
  30. I'm confused... by mliikset · · Score: 1

    How is it possible that the Patent Office can hide the fact that something is patent pending, is this an attempt to deliberately submarine a patent?

  31. Personalised Blogs... by jasgo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    as opposed to..........?

  32. A million baboons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Well, the link requires a single click to view - Amazon already owns a patent on that, so pay up Slashdot!

    If you give a million baboons a million mice, will one of them end up clicking on Amazon?

  33. Another excellent example... by suitepotato · · Score: 1

    ...of why software and other ephemeral patents are a bad idea and should only ever be granted with a much more jaundiced eye than anything like a new kind of machine. I agree with adding Amazon to the dead loopback section of the hosts file. More and more and more we need patent reform.

    --
    If my grammar and spelling are off, I am [distracted/tired/careless] (take your pick)
  34. Perhaps I'm missing something here... by zoomba · · Score: 1

    But this doesn't strike me as a huge issue like it does to so many here.

    Amazon is not talking about patenting the idea of a Blog. What they are looking to patent is the idea of attaching "blurbs" from users and other blog sites to specific items in their online catalog. Sort of like comments attached to a story here on Slashdot, or an RSS feed from another site. It even refers to blogs as an external concept it is trying to mimic in the patent itself.

    They're combining the power of blogs with their search and customer behavior analysis systems to tie in even more relevant information to any given product they're browsing. This is a step towards having a one-stop site for all retail needs. Think of it as a commercial wiki, where everything related to a shopping item is displayed on a side bar. You like scary movies? Well, there's this cool survival horror video game coming out... Oh, and there's a new one hitting theaters, here are the show times near you. Maybe you'd like to read these related thriller novels. And here's a link to our halloween costume section. Here's what everyone says regarding this item too.

    You now have every bit of relevant information to a given product you could ever ask for. This is something that to the best of my knowledge hasn't been done before. They're trying to patent the idea of leveraging these external technologies and concepts and integrating them into their proprietary search and analysis systems to present a new and much deeper experience.

    They're not trying to patent Blogs or RSS feeds. You can all take the tinfoil hats off now.

  35. Laugh all you want ... by vlad_petric · · Score: 1

    The way things evolve, other people might have to use the parent post as prior art

    --

    The Raven

  36. Now THATS by JohnnyGTO · · Score: 1

    FUNNY -- Mod parent up!

    --
    Si vis pacem, para bellum! For evil to succeed good men need only do nothing!
  37. OR. . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hosting up huge pictures but showing them in thumbnail size so that everyone has to download the whole picture when you could have scaled it before posting it.

  38. Plogging is what Roland the Plogger does by Animats · · Score: 1

    Plogging is plugging your blog. Like Roland Piquwhatever, the guy who spams for his blog on Slashdot.

  39. Patenting concepts by bezuwork's+friend · · Score: 1
    If this goes on too much, we may see a reversal.

    In the early 1900s, a guy named Selmer? patented the Road Steamer, IIRC, which covered everything about the automobile. It was so comprehensive that no one could compete in the car industry without Selmer?'s license. Ford couldn't get one, so he manufactured anyway and fought the patent. In the end, he won and the USPTO withdrew the patent.

    Note: I searched for the patent once and couldn't find it.

  40. patent terrorists by kwoff · · Score: 1

    These terrorists must be stopped.

  41. don't forget the comb over by micromuncher · · Score: 1

    Comb Over!

    Patenting linking to peoples blogs is like patenting the comb-over.

    --
    /\/\icro/\/\uncher
    1. Re:don't forget the comb over by micromuncher · · Score: 1

      Ok seriously, the testimonials entered by people using amazon are nothing new, and letting amazon patent testimonials is just silly.

      --
      /\/\icro/\/\uncher
  42. Prior art by roesti · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately for Amazon, the USPTO wouldn't have to look far for prior instances of pricks.

  43. Remember Kodak suing Microsoft and Sun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you rmemeber when Kodak (actually Wang Labs at the time, but Kodak bought Wang) sued Microsoft over a patent. Wang aid Microsoft OLE violated their patent. Microsoft lost.

    Kodak sued Sun over Java infringing their same patent even though Sun provided tons of prior art to the court, but the jury was very biased. The court case was in Rochester where Kodak is a big employer there.

    All Amazon has to do is sue you in the same district that Amazon is and the jury will most likely be sympathetic towards Amazon even though they are wrong.

    Moreover, even if you have a lot of prior art, you still may loose depending on how the jury and judge (or judge is prejudice in my opionion) towards your side.

    Remeber Eloas and Microsoft. Even though there was prior art, the judege did not allow it because he did not want to "prejudice" the jury.

    Sounds like to me the judge did not want the truth to be heard.

  44. 06-21-2004 Rescind Nonpublication Request by theodp · · Score: 1
  45. More Prior Art by tre4lien · · Score: 1

    I, for one, will immediately register a complaint with Amazon for naming their new feature after an existing project.

    Also, haven't countless Content Management Systems , Groupware, and Portals had personal log features forever? I know my previous employers intra-net has has this feature for years. (PHP Nuke must for sure!)

    http://www.opensourcecms.com/
    After looking at all the Web site management systems out there, you can't tell me that this is not already a well known feature. Some people call it "Sticky notes", "Personal notepad" "Frequent actions" etc...

    How does a person point out Prior art to a patent examiner?

  46. Re:First plog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well played.

  47. We did this nine years ago by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am so tired of companies filing for patents on other peoples' inventions. I built a system almost identical to Amazon's circa 1996 when I was working for an e-commerce company.

    We had incorporated all sorts of personalization features into our website. The website was a bit clunky, as they all were then, but the basic concept was the same. I'll have to research the process for challenging a patent, because this one looks to be total bullshit to me.

    I've seen worse though. A couple of years ago, some pricks (I mean lawyers) claimed they had patented the idea of transmitting an audio file across a network, in 2001. Odd, because I remember downloading (small) audio files from BBS systems when I was a teenager, and that was in the mid-1980s (anybody remember Fidonet?)

    They really need to abolish software patents. This isn't helping anybody except the corporations that can afford full-time attorneys.

  48. Re:First plog by ROU+Nuisance+Value · · Score: 1

    Hey! Yet another slope-browed A/C idiot! I thought they were all offline and hanging around a hospice in Florida this week!