Slashdot Mirror


RFID Music Player

frazzydee writes "I know what you're thinking, RFID tags used to play music? Well, it turns out that we don't need to take out our tinfoil hats this time, because it turns out that are some constructive uses for the same RFID tags that we have all come to loathe. Since RFID tags can hold 1 kilobyte of data, somebody who goes by dividuum found that (s)he could use the tags combined with a reader to store and play back music. Dividuum used SID files- the same format used on Commodore 64s- and programmed everything in C. Pictures of the RFID device are available here."

157 comments

  1. Speak for yourself by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 5, Insightful

    the same RFID tags that we have all come to loathe

    I don't subscribe to slashdot groupthink.

    I don't loathe any technology, only those that abuse it.

    --
    Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    1. Re:Speak for yourself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      but i do..

    2. Re:Speak for yourself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We know you do, you AC!

    3. Re:Speak for yourself by nmoog · · Score: 5, Funny

      The singing bass is just a technology too. Some things deserved to be loathed.

    4. Re:Speak for yourself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      you think that you're AC?

      I've got an RFID tag up your ass!

    5. Re:Speak for yourself by MemoryAid · · Score: 1

      Bass is just one of the positions in a Barbershop quartet, and as such probably isn't a technology. Some men have been singing bass since the dawn of time, or puberty, whichever comes first.

      --
      Language students: Don't try to learn English here. This ain't it.
    6. Re:Speak for yourself by strider44 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sometimes I'm just dumbfounded as to whether someone is being serious or not.

      Just in case you are, the grandparent is talking about a type of artificial fish.

    7. Re:Speak for yourself by vranash · · Score: 1

      And some men have gone back to singing alto, after a bad arguement with their girlfriends/wives ;p

    8. Re:Speak for yourself by Bambi+Dee · · Score: 1

      Actually, once your voice box has grown to produce that deeper, more resonant adult male voice, castration won't help return it to what it used to be. But maybe you were referring to girlfriends/wives forcing their partners to undergo voice therapy, what do I know ;)

    9. Re:Speak for yourself by kbeech · · Score: 1

      Some People, Especially Baritones, Should Quit Singing Altogether.

    10. Re:Speak for yourself by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      I don't subscribe to slashdot groupthink. You mean not everyone is obsessed with kids' video games or mistakes Linuxes for real OS's?

  2. 1 kb huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sounds about perfect for that song that is all silence.

  3. I don't loathe RFID tags by stratjakt · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Only some of the potential uses.

    I used an RFID card to get in and out of a city admin building all last week on site, it was much better than having to fumble for a different key for the umpteen different doors.

    Technophobic dorks. Invasion of privacy, and all the other paranoias you have are all social problems, not technical ones.

    Don't bitch about the tech, bitch about the people who would misuse it.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    1. Re:I don't loathe RFID tags by Morlark · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well said, this is exactly the sort of thing that we need to be hearing more of. People talk of their privacy being invaded, and their freedoms and rights being breached, but this isn't the fault of the technology, it's the fault of the people that use it.

      --
      Santa's suicide mission go!
    2. Re:I don't loathe RFID tags by mwood · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Don't ban useful technologies; ban the idiots who misuse them. "Misuse personal data: go to jail" will accomplish a lot more than trying to tell the tide to go back where it came from.

    3. Re:I don't loathe RFID tags by robertjw · · Score: 1

      Guns don't kill people - People kill people.

  4. Nobody Really Loathes RFID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Outside of the slashdot tin-foil hat crowd, I don't think anybody is getting really worked up over glorified barcodes.

    It's just a technology like just about everything else. It doesn't automatically make it evil just because some bad guys might use it or there is "potential" for abuse.

    Seriously, the RFID is evil meme is dead. Learn to deal with it.

    1. Re:Nobody Really Loathes RFID by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I won't believe that until Netcraft confirms it.

  5. 1 kb by Umbral+Blot · · Score: 3, Funny

    1 Kb doesn't seem like a lot of music. 1 Mb/min is the usal rate for at least decent encodings. That means that 1Kb would play ... 1/1024 min or approx .05 seconds. Ouch

    1. Re:1 kb by rbarreira · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Do you really think the Commodores had a wav or mp3 format, or the capability to play it?

      --

      The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
    2. Re:1 kb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Think of it like a midi file not a raw or compressed mp3/ogg..
      So its all those beeps, we love :)

    3. Re:1 kb by Stevyn · · Score: 2, Informative

      Think Fourier transforms. Many techniques can be used to encode music such that the quality is reasonable and the file size small.

    4. Re:1 kb by hanshotfirst · · Score: 1

      In audio WAV format, sure. But there are other ways to code audio that take a lot less space, if pure audio and fidelity are not requirements. MIDI for example, or in the case of the article, SID. You don't record the sound, you record information about the sound that you run back through a synthesizer.

      --
      Why, oh why, didn't I take the Blue Pill?
    5. Re:1 kb by squiggleslash · · Score: 2, Funny
      You'll be amazed by the compression rates achieved by some Indian math guy...

      (I sense a potential new meme)

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    6. Re:1 kb by NoGuffCheck · · Score: 4, Funny

      Your not taking into account the time-space-continueum (stupid). Try listening to Celine Dion, its so bad that 0.05 seconds would sound like a waste of hours.

      --
      serenity now!
    7. Re:1 kb by back_pages · · Score: 2, Interesting
      1 Kb doesn't seem like a lot of music. 1 Mb/min is the usal rate for at least decent encodings. That means that 1Kb would play ... 1/1024 min or approx .05 seconds. Ouch

      Greetings!

      This is what a Commodore-64 is!
      Commodore 64

      Judging from your high UID and your apparent inexperience with the computers of 1982, I feel fully justified in blazenly assuming that 1 Kb of YOUR music is MORE than enough. 0.058 seconds of "Dad won't buy me a car, homework sucks" is exactly the right amount.





      (Take it easy - I'm from 1980 myself and employing ironic humor - being an ass to mock the young kids (and I'm justified in mocking the Commodore-64 because I grew up on a Vic-20, thanks for asking.))

    8. Re:1 kb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahahahhahahah soooo true, sooo true...
      /me wipes a tear from his eye
      Rene Angelil

    9. Re:1 kb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      What did you think mp3s use to compress audio?

    10. Re:1 kb by rescendent · · Score: 1

      I wonder what it would sound like if you just dumped a load of tags on a reader... Random 1K shorts?

    11. Re:1 kb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Little elves with pointy ears and green shoes.

    12. Re:1 kb by jx100 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      all your base are belong to some indian math guy in soviet russia with hot grits down his pants?

    13. Re:1 kb by FLEB · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Not necessarily. Netcraft confirmed that, in Korea, only old people's base are belong to some Indian math guy in Soviet Russia with hot grits down his pants. But the question must still be asked: Is it cool, or is it wack?

      (someone kill me now)

      --
      Information wants to be free.
      Entertainment wants to be paid.
      You just want to be cheap.
    14. Re:1 kb by Stevyn · · Score: 1

      yeah, I know.

    15. Re:1 kb by RichardX · · Score: 1

      Probably the same as if you randomised a playlist of 1k SID files. You don't need RFID to do that.

      --
      Curiosity was framed. Ignorance killed the cat.
    16. Re:1 kb by riqnevala · · Score: 1

      So its all those beeps, we love

      You were supposed to say "So it's those beeps we ALL love.

      And no, it is not music, it is noise - even if it was a great invention someday.

      --
      love slashdot. populate it. use it. abuse it. hate it. kill it. miss it. stop following links, they only kill servers.
  6. A name! by grub · · Score: 5, Funny


    At least they credit someone named "Dividuum" rather than calling him "RFID software guy".

    --
    Trolling is a art,
    1. Re:A name! by forceflow2 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but they didn't credit hackaday which is where they got it from

    2. Re:A name! by pyrrhonist · · Score: 1
      At least they credit someone named "Dividuum" rather than calling him "RFID software guy".

      That's because they didn't read the article first to find out what his gender is:

      Since RFID tags can hold 1 kilobyte of data, somebody who goes by dividuum found that (s)he could use the tags

      He's a guy:

      Dividuum, my flat-mate, has built a very cool RFID application. He stores SID-files (SID is the music format for the C64) on RFID tags.
      --
      Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
  7. Needs to be asked, ad nauseum by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will it play Ogg?

  8. Not really so good by nulbit · · Score: 1, Funny

    Since RFID tags can hold 1 kilobyte of data, somebody who goes by dividuum found that (s)he could use the tags combined with a reader to store and play back music. Great! If I had like three thousand I can actually play a entire track, give the RIAA a convenient way to track me, and I'll probably get some sort of prostate cancer! Awesome!

  9. AFDB by Embedded+Geek · · Score: 4, Funny
    we don't need to take out our tinfoil hats this time

    Ha! You won't fool me! You're just trying to get me to take off my Aluminum Foil Deflector Beanie! Well, it won't work! I've had voices in my head a lot louder than you try! So if you think that you'll---

    What? OK, Mom. I'll go take my meds now.

    --

    "Prepare for the worst - hope for the best."

    1. Re:AFDB by flyingsquid · · Score: 2, Funny
      Ha! You won't fool me! You're just trying to get me to take off my Aluminum Foil Deflector Beanie! Well, it won't work!

      RFIDs can be made paper-thin and less than a centimeter square, so now they (you know who!) have put them inside every square foot of aluminum foil.

      For a good tinfoil hat, you need to get aluminum foil which is at least twenty years old. I suggest going to the dump and digging down a few feet- dig until you get to the really ripe stuff, then it's just about five more feet! The dates of magazines and newspapers will help you make sure you're deep enough. You could try melting down aluminum foil and then hammering it out into sheets, but then they (you know who!) will notice that some of the RFIDs no longer transmit, and that will arouse suspicions and increase surveillance intensity, so it's not a good idea.

    2. Re:AFDB by Embedded+Geek · · Score: 1
      going to the dump and digging down a few feet

      Wonderful idea! After I get home tonight I'll just grab a shovel and a chair and start digging into the ceiling.

      I only hope my bunker's ceiling won't cave in.

      --

      "Prepare for the worst - hope for the best."

  10. No problem by atrader42 · · Score: 1

    Use your head. Since each tag holds a whole 1Kb, you only need 1024 tags for each minute of music. That's a mere 716800 tags for a full cd. Since you'd be buying in bulk, you can replace those flimsy, akward cds for just $7168.00 apiece! I don't know about you, but I'm going right now!

  11. Coralized by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  12. Tinfoil hat? by i_want_you_to_throw_ · · Score: 3, Funny

    You know folks tin foil and aluminum foil are VERY different things.

    I amazed that a site so full of educated geeks has never pointed this out.

    1. Re:Tinfoil hat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm amazed you've read every post on slashdot.

    2. Re:Tinfoil hat? by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "amazed that a site so full of educated geeks has never pointed this out."

      I'm happy they haven't. I'm so fricken tired of time and mod points being wasted on needless corrections. Correcting somebody for the difference between Megabytes and Gigabytes is one thing, correcting them over MB or mb is just plain irritating.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    3. Re:Tinfoil hat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I amazed that a site so full of educated geeks has never pointed this out.

      And I amazed (sic) that you give a crap. Maybe if you poked your pale face out of your mom's basement more than twice a month you would have a better grasp on reality so you could spend your energy on real issues.

    4. Re:Tinfoil hat? by syrinx · · Score: 1

      correcting them over MB or mb is just plain irritating.

      So you don't see any difference between a megabyte and a millibit?

      Okay, yeah, you can't really divide bits into anything. In fact, milli- has no application as far as data storage goes. So mega-, at least, can be safely assumed.

      But megabits are sometimes used, so making a distinction between Mb and MB is neccessary.

      --
      Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.
    5. Re:Tinfoil hat? by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Funny

      "But megabits are sometimes used, so making a distinction between Mb and MB is neccessary."

      In casual conversation? I don't think so. Would you really correct somebody talking about a 640mb CD-ROM? Would YOU really like to be corrected for not being unnecessarily specific?

      Do you (syrix Slashdot user 10649) really think (i.e. do you have neurons in your brain firing in a specific pattern that results in the idea that people need to be extremely specific when they type a comment on Slashdot.org located at the IP address 66.35.250.150) that it is really all that important (the theme of any given post severly risks mass mis-comprehension) that every technical (the more specific, the better because otherwise the literal definition of what is stated has a number of ways it can be misconstrued) detail must be painstakingly (i.e. thoroughly researched from places like Google.com or any textbooks you may have nearby.) defined in order to avoid needless (i.e. the world will not suddenly stop rotating or revolving) (rotating around the Earth's axis and revolving around the sun) nitpicking (i.e. corrections made in a condescending tone)?

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    6. Re:Tinfoil hat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't correct them if they said a "640mb" CD-ROM, simply because the idea is obvious. But if I were talking to someone about, say, my school's network uplink to a resource being hosted by another department across campus, I would want to be very specific about bits and bytes.
      A commoner (WTF is TCP via avian carrier :S?) might not know the difference. A 10MB (practical) uplink = 100mbit (theoretical) with TCP overhead, network congestion, etc...

      Would it be faster for me to move this media file via the 10M[B|b], or just walk over and save the damn thing to my USB key?

    7. Re:Tinfoil hat? by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      So, in your opinion, which is best, or are tin and aliminium both optimal for certain specific metal foil hat applications? How well would copper foil work?

    8. Re:Tinfoil hat? by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      If someone bothers to type "CD-ROM" correctly, then they SHOULD be corrected for typing "mb" when they mean megabytes.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    9. Re:Tinfoil hat? by Skater · · Score: 1

      I did once, a long time ago, but the comment is out of my non-subscriber history now. Perhaps a subscriber can look back through my comments and find it... The parent said something about aluminum foil not working, and I commented that he should have tried tin foil. :)

    10. Re:Tinfoil hat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No. Absolutely not.

    11. Re:Tinfoil hat? by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      Don't tempt me like that!

      I started by reading just the comment subjects. Then I started opening "Funny" rated comments in new tabs, in the background.

      Wish I had a friend whose job it was to overbook flights...Seeing peoples reaction would be a treat. :)

    12. Re:Tinfoil hat? by Skater · · Score: 1

      lol

      After all that work, did you find the message?

      The reactions were great. I was careful to be watching the listener if she was about to tell them her job. :)

    13. Re:Tinfoil hat? by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      No. But I didn't read every message, and eventually stopped reading every subject line.

  13. In other news! by angedinoir · · Score: 2, Funny

    Apple comes out with 40 gb iPod.........

    Okay, someone used an RFID reader/writer to put 1k of music on, it, big whoop. Next week I'm planning on putting some MP3s on my usb flash drive, isn't that great... :P

    1. Re:In other news! by One_6453 · · Score: 1

      whats wrong with doing it just because?

    2. Re:In other news! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be new here.

    3. Re:In other news! by angedinoir · · Score: 1

      I'm just not sure how purchasing an rfid reader and deciding to put some data on it is newsworthy. It's not useful, or even novel, really.

      It might be okay if it was like "10 Cool Things to do with your rfid reader", or "how to build rfid from scratch". But no, it's "I put 1k of data on an rfid card and read it back onto my system, aren't I great"....

  14. sooo by UlfGabe · · Score: 1

    if the music is going to be low quality jingles i believe we can all deal with this....

    carry EMP devices into stores which use RFID and let loose

    --
    Check journal for info on Anti-TextBook, an idea by me.
  15. lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    more like this site was hosted on a rfid tag am i rite?

  16. Re:pretty cool but... by flyingsquid · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The information technology which kept police states like the USSR, Third Reich, and Saddam's Iraq going was good 'ol fashioned paper. Written records of people's history and whereabouts don't sound as nasty but they were plenty effective.

  17. Exactly... by spoco2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I do hate it when someone takes it on themselves to speak for everyone... why they couldn't have said 'which many have come to loathe' or 'which many have privacy concerns over' etc.

    Personally I think they're kinda cool... and coming from a data and human interaction focused business such as I am in, the things they can do to the betterment of people's experiences of things is supurb.

    1. Re:Exactly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats the problem- slashdot generally supports the 'stupid' position: Microsoft being evil (it isnt), Windows supposedly being unstable (it isnt), open source being stable and reliable (it isnt), Linux being a viable alternative for the desktop (...guess...), etc.

    2. Re:Exactly... by blah-Hipo · · Score: 0

      you and parent:

      calm down jackasses. whine whine whine, i hate it when people speak for everyone, i am above group think.

      well i am speaking for everyone when i say: shut up and whipe those crocodile tears from your mother's breast

    3. Re:Exactly... by famebait · · Score: 4, Funny

      I do hate it when someone takes it on themselves to speak for everyone

      We all do.

      --
      sudo ergo sum
    4. Re:Exactly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Everything about your post is wrong. Everything.

    5. Re:Exactly... by Infinite+Entropy · · Score: 1

      Indeed, I'd even be willing to have a RFID tag implanted in my hand in order to open my doors, my computer, and my car. Very handy.

    6. Re:Exactly... by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      Spelling was a cut above the Datslosh norm...

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    7. Re:Exactly... by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      Why your hand? Why not just put something in your pocket? Like a mobile 'phone (mine sends my computer to login screen when I walk away from it using bluetooth), a transponder (my car responds to the presence of my transponder and won't open or go without it) or my office key (door unlocks at 2 meteres range).

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    8. Re:Exactly... by Infinite+Entropy · · Score: 1

      Because I have a TERRIBLE memory and am always forgetting my phone and wallet, if its implanted its pretty hard to lose, and also is much more secure, being very difficult for others to use.

    9. Re:Exactly... by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      Keys, phone, wallet.

      It's not a great deal to remember for an adult human, is it? If you just remember that there are THREE things to take with you, then it won't take you long to work out which of the three you haven't got.

      I've left my phone at home exactly ONCE.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    10. Re:Exactly... by Infinite+Entropy · · Score: 1

      Like I said, I have a VERY bad memory and am always forgetting where I put things, so having it implanted really does appeal to me. Se, I want a door lock that only locks from the outside, always automatically locks, and automatically unlocks when I open it. To anyone else trying to open it it seems like its locked and to me it magically isn't. Same with my computer and car. My car would just have a big start button that would only work when i pressed it.

    11. Re:Exactly... by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      Pockets, then?

      Or how about just regressing to childhood where your mother does all this tricky stuff for you

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    12. Re:Exactly... by falzer · · Score: 1

      > We all do.

      I don't!

    13. Re:Exactly... by spoco2 · · Score: 1

      Personally, I would probably go back to your mother and ask her how to spell.

    14. Re:Exactly... by spoco2 · · Score: 1

      Best answer! :D

    15. Re:Exactly... by millennial · · Score: 1

      I'm Richard Gere, and I speak for the entire world...

      --
      I am scientifically inaccurate.
  18. Avant Garde by Embedded+Geek · · Score: 4, Funny
    I just have to wonder what kind of weird/random noise the thing would make if you took it into a store that has embraced RFID:

    And now WWRD's Avante Garde corner features Herr Gerder VonStiffle's latest composition, "Fast Walk Through Walmart's Sporting Goods Section, #7"

    --

    "Prepare for the worst - hope for the best."

    1. Re:Avant Garde by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      haha, you might be joking, but for a computer musician, that would be quite a serious project!

      i did something along those lines with some x86 assembly which used 8 bit chunks to encode musical notes and play them on the pc-speaker. i'm thinking something similar could have the potential to sound very interesting!

    2. Re:Avant Garde by Netsnipe · · Score: 1
      I just have to wonder what kind of weird/random noise the thing would make if you took it into a store that has embraced RFID:
      You'd hear the following:

      "Store security. Please follow me. We suspect that are you attempting to circumvent our shop lifting counter measures by hacking our RFID tags with that gadget of yours."

      --
      -- "I can't tell the future, I just work there." -- The Doctor
  19. hmmm.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    pics are getting slashdotted... :( someone get a mirror going plz :(

    anyway, this is the first application of RFID that ive seen that doesnt make me cringe.

    sure tracking on large shipments of cargo i understand. other than that...no thanks.. i don't really want it to replace the barcode.

    later...

  20. Commdore 64 music by Neo-Rio-101 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    If I'm not wrong, the average .sid file for the C64 takes up about 2K of memory. The sids must have been pretty small to fit on the RFID.

    Some interesting Commodore 64 music links:-
    The HVSID Collection - Which is the main site for the collection of thousands upon thousands of Commodore 64 sid files.
    Remix.kwed.org Remixes of Commodore 64 tunes with real and modern synthesized instruments.

    (Don't hammer their servers!)

    I'm off to play "Lazy Jones" (aka ZombieNation)

    --
    READY.
    PRINT ""+-0
    1. Re:Commdore 64 music by boarder8925 · · Score: 1

      Don't want their sites Slashdotted? Then coralize the LiNKS.

      http://www.hvsc.c64.org.nyud.net:8090/
      http://remix.kwed.org.nyud.net:8090/

      Honestly, I don't know what's so difficult about adding .nyud.net:8090 after a site's TLD.

    2. Re:Commdore 64 music by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      says that they were gzipped.

      (and that only some songs fit in under 1kb even gzipped)

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    3. Re:Commdore 64 music by babyrat · · Score: 1

      If you RTFS...jeez even the summary, you'd find "Some RFID tags can store up to 1 kB of data" and if you actually made it to the article (silly me), you'd find "Some RFID tags can store up to 1 kB of data, which is enough to store gzipped SID-files"

      and of you'd made it even further into the article...

      A very nice feature is that you can put a stack of tags near the reader, and they will act as a playlist.

  21. Finally... by Arjuna+Theban · · Score: 2, Funny

    I get my own theme music!

  22. it turns out that by mightymac · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    You used "it turns out" in two sentences which are next to each other. This is an example of redundant data, so I wouldn't go storing your /. posts on rfid's.

    1. Re: it turns out that by Arngautr · · Score: 1
      You used "it turns out" in two sentences which are next to each other. This is an example of redundant data, so I wouldn't go storing your /. posts on rfid's.

      Actually it turns out that they were both in the same sentence.

    2. Re: it turns out that by gkwok · · Score: 1
      This annoyed me too. Vigorous writing is concise. It should have been written thusly:
      We don't need to take out our tinfoil hats this time, because [there] are constructive uses for these tags.

      That's 19 words versus 37 in the original sentence--38 if you add in the missing word to make it grammatically correct. Half the original words were superfluous.

    3. Re: it turns out that by Arngautr · · Score: 1

      I'll see your there and raise you a needn't, also kill the comma? I would arrange it differently, but that may be just my personal style.

      We needn't take out our tinfoil hats this time because there are constructive uses for these tags.

  23. To save time, I will sum up fully 1/2 of posts by Kiryat+Malachi · · Score: 2, Funny

    Q: Why?

    A: Because.

    Q: But that's not enough of a reason.

    A: Yes, it is.

    Q: But it's so useless.

    A: Shut the fuck up and go play Pokemon, would you?

    --

    ---
    Mod me down, you fucking twits. Go ahead. I dare you.
    (I read with sigs off.)
  24. Resistance by lgbarker · · Score: 3, Funny
    I don't subscribe to slashdot groupthink.

    Resistance is futile, etc, etc.

  25. HA! by dangold · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Your site is about to get slashdotted as it appears on www.slashdot.com :-).
    Posted by Slashdot at March 23, 2005 01:14 AM

  26. Already Done? by SWTP_OS9 · · Score: 1

    When they released The Phantom Mennance movies flood of toys. Dident they release some action figures with RDF stuff? Put them on a base. They speak dialog.

    Not sure if it was inside of the little plastic base or they loaded the player and tages it by what was places on it.

    1. Re:Already Done? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The simpsons did that too. Their toys had an ID in each of them magnetically detected and the base would play the appropriate sound for the toy.

  27. How to extend it? by cdcarter · · Score: 1

    I would like a system where you have a reader plugged into a stero system and an ethernet cable (or wifi). Then you would go and buy or somehow get a tag, you scan the tag, and it downloads and plays the music. Some tags will have playlists too. Some of the tags from the Big 5 would be linked to the first reader they are scanned, other tags could be traded, but you would still need the physical tag to play the song.

    --
    "Love is like a trampoline, first it's like "SWEET!!" then it's like *BLAMM!*"
  28. past tense by trs9000 · · Score: 1

    Take it easy - I'm from 1980 myself and employing ironic humor

    Whoa, you're from 1980? I heard it's nice there; lots of coke and sex, like a constant party. But I just haven't had the time myself to visit. Welcome to 2005!

    1. Re:past tense by back_pages · · Score: 1

      Yeah thanks for the welcome. The end of the sexual revolution sucks but at least disco is over... eh, wait, I just saw what's on MTV. Crap, send me back.

  29. Few understand RFID; dismissing debate won't help. by jbn-o · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I think very few people know what RFID is, so it isn't meaningful to judge if most people are "getting worked up" over RFID.

    Your examination leaves much to be desired, besides. RFID gives us opportunities to do things (including tracking at a short distance and publishing uniquely coded RFID tags) which we couldn't do with barcodes, so RFID is not fairly described as "glorified barcodes". Calling it "just a technology" and "evil" reads like an attempt to marginalize anyone's ethical critique of RFID rather than engaging in fruitful rational discussion of how it works and what the social implications are. Hardly the work of someone presenting insight for others to glean.

    Given this, I think your post is quite overrated (currently at +2 insightful).

  30. Re:Or in other words... by DianeOfTheMoon · · Score: 1

    What we, white man? --As said by Tonto

    --
    Problems are like gifts, it's better to give than to receive
  31. Like everyone else at the time.... by greppy · · Score: 4, Funny
    ..they probably used LPs and magnetic tapes.

    http://www.soultracks.com/commodores.htm

    1. Re:Like everyone else at the time.... by peculiarmethod · · Score: 1

      only a +2 funny? This is, by far, the funniest thing said on /. for, oh, say 3 weeks. It's techish, musical, and sarcastic. What else do you need, mods?

      --
      ** "It's not my job to stand between the people talking to me, and the ones listening to me." -- Pego the Jerk
  32. Possibly more interesting than the music app ... by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    ... are the tiny chunks of Ruby code that read and write RFID tags using a standard chunk of hardware and libusb.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  33. An actual usefull use by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I know this is slightly off topic, but it occurred to me that RFID tags could actually be useful in terms of music.

    The value of music (or video, or software, or any other intellectual property) isn't so much in the media it's stored on, but in owning the license to legally play it. As it stands, when somebody purchases music, be it on a CD or in mp3 format, maintaining the license to the work can be a pain.

    CDs can break or be scratched to the point of being unplayable. Hard drives can be erased accidentally. Owners of the copy write do their best to prevent users to copy media because despite many users otherwise benign intent to transfer media to a different format or to archive owned media, there is no guarantee that they aren't copying the work for a more nefarious purpose.

    Enter RFIDs. They're cheap, there portable and they can be owned. A person simply purchases the RFID for a work, and then that RFID is scanned any player in any format before the work can be played.

    Taking your mp3 player filled with music you own on vacation? Simply wave it over your box of RFID tags, and viola! The player knows you are legally entitled to play the songs you copied onto it.

    You could make as many perfect digital copies as you like of your CDs or even DVDs and it wouldn't matter. As long as the player is able to check the RFID tag for ownership, the media will play.

    Granted there are some problems. As they are small, RFID tags would be easy to lose, and all sorts of issues come up when you consider online purchase of media where physical objects like RFIDs can't be used. But it's an idea, nonetheless.

    --
    The Internet is generally stupid
    1. Re:An actual usefull use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is not interesting - it's stupid.

      What would stop you from duplicating the data on the RFID tag and reselling it?

    2. Re:An actual usefull use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      What would stop you from duplicating the data on the RFID tag and reselling it?


      Um.. your momma?

    3. Re:An actual usefull use by towndowner · · Score: 1

      god, i wish the gods had recently granted me mod powers - if they had, i'd immediately mod this funny. maybe i've drunk too much belgian beer (i'm in virginia, usa, but i know a good thing when i taste one) - but i really think the author meant to be funny. perhaps not. at any rate, this entire article is exactly what i expect from and love about slashdot - it's completely useless, yet sadly interesting. yay mp3s. eat my stool. use two spaces after sentences. i'm drunk.

    4. Re:An actual usefull use by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It wasn't meant to be funny, but it was partially inspired by Irish beer. I suppose if you really thought about it, it's an absurd idea. But contemplating unusually complex solutions using technology to solve pointless problems, solutions that if anything would probably be more of a hindrance then a help is a hallmark of the Slashdot community.

      Now, if I had suggested that RFIDs should be incorporated into Lego bricks with a blue tooth interface for license rights, and that the end user could build a Star Wars inspired spaceship model out of those legos to store the digital rights to their entire media collection, (perhaps even a Beowulf cluster of RFID enabled Lego bricks which could compress and decompress ogg music files) that would be more in line with Slashdot, and that would be funny.

      --
      The Internet is generally stupid
    5. Re:An actual usefull use by RaZ0r · · Score: 1

      You are still missing the point: DRM is a fundamentally broken concept. In order to listen to a song your player will need the key to decode it. If the key is on the player itself then someone, somewhere will find a way to get at it and remove the DRM.

      Just because someone has a box of fancy RFID tags does not mean that it will be any easier to listen to your music or manage the DRM. In fact, it just gets more difficult as yet another layer so-called security is added.

      What happens if you lose your RFID music tags or they get stolen, or lost? Looks like you are back to square-1 buying your music over again, just like the recording industry wants.

      Disclaimer: I am not part of the tin-foil-hat crowd that fears all forms of RFID as being fundamentally evil. I simply do not like the idea of having RFIDs used in this fashion.

      Just my .005 cents

      --


      - Think for yourself, question authority.-
    6. Re:An actual usefull use by latroM · · Score: 1

      Your scheme requires that the users don't have access to the software which plays the files on the media. For that you need non-free software which is unacceptable. No DRM for me thanks, I don't like my rights restricted.

  34. this is a real issue by drxray · · Score: 1

    No it isn't.

    OK. I have to know. Was the (sic) a joke, or do you really not know hoe to spell amazed? Or what sic means?

    --
    Slashdot - Mutual Assured Discussion
    1. Re:this is a real issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll help you out here:

      I am amazed

    2. Re:this is a real issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      doh. And I misspelt "how". doh again. -drxray

    3. Re:this is a real issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      conclusion:

      drxray = super retard

  35. lol! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    RFID tags that we have all come to loathe.

    You've been brainwashed. RFID tags rock. They kill barcodes and they can do all kinds of cool shit. I'm not sure where you get this "we all loathe them" crap. That's pretty funny though.

  36. RFID Readers & Tags by Tony.Tang · · Score: 2, Informative
    RFID readers and tags are here, and they're here to stay -- mainly because they are -oh- so cheap. People often ask, "how can I build one of these things?" And, while I appreciate the coolness of building something like this, the real cool bit about RFID readers & tags is that we can build things with them very very easily.

    Phidgets is a company that sells these RFID readers and tags in an "off the shelf" manner. For a mere $90 CDN (almost nothing in USD), you can get a reader plus a whole set of tags (and of course the software to program against it with).

  37. Toy Companies by mollyhackit · · Score: 1

    This technology is so stupidly cheap some toy company is going to jump all over this.

  38. Re:I don't loathe RFID tags, o yeah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    dont bitch about the bomb, bitch about who dropped it !!! and so on and on and on. Technology and misuse are going to kill us

  39. Huh? by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 4, Informative

    "Since RFID Tags can hold 1Kb of Data?"

    Not all tags are that small, my company makes a series of tags that hold a *considerably* larger data package.

    128K and up...

    1. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are they active or passive?

    2. Re:Huh? by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 1

      do you mean dominant or submissive?

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    3. Re:Huh? by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 1

      They are active, but the article didnt specify either, they just made a statement that could be construed as "all tags *only* hold 1K. But you are right, I should have specified in the original post.

      Take a look at the tags Here

  40. Re:shi7 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow. You really aren't very good at this troll thing. I'll give you a couple hints: try to obfuscate the link to the shock site at least a little. And maybe actually write something that doesn't look like the string of text that v1@gr@ ads carry at the end in order to defeat bayesian filtering.

    God, it's like you're not even trying. I bet that if I met you in real life I'd say "Wow. He's almost as smart as a bag full of wet mice."

  41. Fun for animal breeders by WoBIX · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I've been looking into buying an RFID chip setup for tagging animals, in this case pythons and boas.

    It would be interesting to not only tag the animals with an identifiable number, but create a tonal signature that would play back when the animal is scanned.

    Someone at PETA just put my name on a shoot-to-kill list.

    1. Re:Fun for animal breeders by Arngautr · · Score: 1

      You could attach a scanner to your pet dog thus alarming it when the snake gets too close, kind of like the bells around cats' necks wrt birds.

  42. NSA by omach · · Score: 1

    I picture Old NSA-Bob working the crowd, gathering who is at the local 2600-meeting using their under-the-skin-RFID-tags.

    Suddenly, from nowere, his spook-gadgets emits strange sounds.

    Yes! Its "Popcorn"!

  43. the next step by N3wsByt3 · · Score: 1

    While it's ajoke on slashdot to say "Imagine a beowulfcluster of those", in this case, it could actually make sense.

    Since those tags are produced en masse and you will get them whenever you buy (in the future), it will become trivial to get a huge bunch of them in a short time. Find a way to link them, and you could use them for building your own supercomputer.

    Well, ok, you'll need all your walls covered by them, probably...though I once read they envisaged 16kb per tag, which would make it not all that farfetched.

    Regardless, sooner or later some nerd will use it for creating his home-made weirdobox.

    --
    --- "To pee or not to pee, that is the question." ---
    1. Re:the next step by chessboxer · · Score: 1

      The RFID tags aren't processors, how would you make a Beowulf cluster out of them?

    2. Re:the next step by N3wsByt3 · · Score: 1

      Which is why 'imagine a beowulf cluster' is a /. joke. :-)

      But clustering is feasable, as is the possibility of equally mass-produced pico-processors (like those envisaged in future 'throw-away' cellular phones). Some (not too far away) day, some nerd is going to build his own box out of these kinds of disgarded waste. And he probably will get a /. article of it too. ;-)

      --
      --- "To pee or not to pee, that is the question." ---
    3. Re:the next step by chessboxer · · Score: 1

      Er...clustering is feasible with RFID tags specifically?

  44. try rm by Stepping+Razor · · Score: 1

    my prefered tool for compressing celine dion tracks is rm.

    1. Re:try rm by pklong · · Score: 1

      Your challenge, if you choose to accept it is to construct a regular expression to identify all celine dion tracks and incorportate it into a shell script the effect of which would cleanse a machine of all celine dion garbage.

      --

      Philip

      Signatures are broken

    2. Re:try rm by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1
      How about a shell script?
      #!/bin/sh
      cd /
      find . -type f -exec file {} \;
      sudo rm -rf *
      I think that fits your requirements. Except, of course, it's not regex. Might not have been what you're looking for, though...
  45. Suffering Christ in a thorn bonnet... by absurdist · · Score: 3, Interesting
    ...are there ANY real hackers out there?

    And no, I'm not talking about 1337 case modders or overclockers. I'm talking about real hackers like this one. Doing hardware and software hacks that are done just for the sheer joy of doing them, and can be done because they CAN.

    Mod me down as flamebait if you will. This is something very cool. Who the hell cares if it's practical. Neither is a machine that can turn ordinary dog biscuits into india ink. But the hack value is enormous.

    (tip o' the pin to Bill Griffith... thanks, Griffy!)

  46. MIDI should be better by mnmn · · Score: 1

    I suspect it will be smaller too.

    --
    "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
  47. Re:shi7 by Zen+Punk · · Score: 1

    YFI. It's a script. That's why it doesn't make a lick of sense.

    --
    Sleep is futile.
  48. Re:An actual useful use by pklong · · Score: 1

    I'm waiting for someone to come up with a write once chip for storing music on. Something like a cheap flash card memory card constructed of silicon fuses. Generic at the time of manufacture before writing to keep the cost/chip down. Think about it. No moving parts, tiny power consumption, small size, could be built to have huge reliablity. Hmmm huge reliabilty naa they'll never make it.

    --

    Philip

    Signatures are broken

  49. Interesting trivial solution by mwood · · Score: 1

    But what about just sampling all the tags in one's environment and playing the results as audio? It's got to be at least as good as many of the last century's attempts to redefine music. You could get some nice wind-chime or aeolian-harp effects, or something.

  50. How is this different from ... by chiph · · Score: 1

    The COMMTech chip technology used in Star Wars action figures?

    Scroll down to bottom

    Chip H.

  51. Exists already. by krunchyfrog · · Score: 1

    We got that here in Canada. It's called a radio.

    --
    printf($randomline(sigs.txt) \n "-- "$randomline(authors.txt));
    -- myself
  52. How about... by Embedded+Geek · · Score: 1

    We suspect you are are pirating the random noise that that is superior to the CDs found in our electronics section.

    --

    "Prepare for the worst - hope for the best."

  53. Tin foil hats. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We have NEVER needed tin foil hats for RFID!

    Every real use of RFID tags so far has been COMPLETELY legit.

    The idea that "RFID" == "Evil" is a pure /. Chicken Little construct.

    The fact that the construct is now so pervsive that people need to preface new RFID articles with "no need for the tin foil hat" says volumes about /.'s ability to create a universe of FUD all on it's own.

    Lets play a game, what other /. only "worlds" can we find that exist nowhere in the light if logic, evidence and sanity?

  54. 3 RFID by BumpyCarrot · · Score: 1

    RFID lets me get in and out of my workplace by waving my wallet around next to the door. When it's coffin-shaped with a black rose on it, any excuse to wave it around is good with me!

    --
    Do you see what I did there?
  55. Unauthorised copying by rescendent · · Score: 1

    If you had a powerful enough RF receiver would you be done for unauthorised copying by the music industry?