Slashdot Mirror


Dayton, Ohio: Free City-Wide WiFi

_Bunny writes "The City of Dayton, Ohio announced a plan to make all of downtown a WiFi hotspot - and as of last week, the network is live. This makes Dayton the first Ohio city to offer free WiFi access. Approximately one square mile of downtown is now live, including Fifth Third Field, the Oregon District, Webster Station and RiverScape. The WiFi project is a public/private partnership not funded by taxpayers, and comes at no charge to the end user." (According to the linked story at WHIO-TV, the city is actually paying about $5,000 per year, with advertisers picking up the rest of the tab.)

67 of 350 comments (clear)

  1. City Wide? by Nasa+Rosebuds · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't know what you mean by city-wide, but Dayton is a big place and I doubt "within a 1-mile radius of downtown" really covers it all. Still, this is cool.

    1. Re:City Wide? by FortKnox · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Cincinnati is planning the same thing, and having a neighbor that already has it running will probably push this city into finishing up. Wish they had it today, cause its beautiful outside!

      --
      Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    2. Re:City Wide? by EngrBohn · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hmm... I could scrap my cable modem and set up a Yagi pointing toward downtown Dayton. You think 20 or so elements would get me enough gain from Xenia?

      --
      cb
      Oooh! What does this button do!?
    3. Re:City Wide? by Nos. · · Score: 2, Informative

      Its interesting that they went with WiFi - and thus end up with a pretty limited area. Of course WiMax equipment is quite ready for the masses, though it is being rolled out in some areas.

    4. Re:City Wide? by jargoone · · Score: 2, Funny

      In these tight economic times, why would a city consider it a wise move to spend tax payer monies on project like this just escapes me. How is this system going to pay for itself?

      For fuck's sake, at least read the summary...

      The WiFi project is a public/private partnership not funded by taxpayers, and comes at no charge to the end user.

    5. Re:City Wide? by er_head66 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, actually you are wrong. This is a great idea. For an extremely minimal fee ($5000), they are providing a useful service to the city centre: free connection for office workers, people in transit and local businesses. This is exactly the direction I think wireless internet should be taking, the idea of blanketing regions with free internet and then seeing if a 'killer app' sprouts up that can take advantage of it. When more cities implement systems like this, hardware developers will feel more comfortable included wifi in PDAs and gadgets, sercure with the knowledge that there is actual network that users can take advantage of. Think GPS with Wifi that will give you a local map. Think VOIP cell phones. Think about the whole city toting OQOs and being mobile.

      In this case, I think it is very smart on behalf of the city to be providing this service and more cities should think about implementing similar plans.

      --
      There has been an error!
    6. Re:City Wide? by gurps_npc · · Score: 2, Insightful
      You got stuff backwards there.

      The cost is minimal not great, and the added value is HUGE.

      The cost is like 5,000/year - which seems like a lot only to the people that have no idea what a city spends. 5,000/year is nothing to a city. Far less than how much it pays people to clean up a park's statues.

      This however is a HUGE quality of life issue - it makes the city very attractive to a lot of people, grants internet access to some people that could not afford it. Many people can afford $500 one time payment for a crappy computer +$100 more for a wifi card, but not afford the $1,200 + a year reasonable internet access can cost.

      --
      excitingthingstodo.blogspot.com
    7. Re:City Wide? by INetUser · · Score: 4, Interesting
      blanketing regions with free internet and then seeing if a 'killer app' sprouts up that can take advantage of it

      OK, so it's still on the 'build it they will come' notion / gamble then. I still don't see the great need for being connected like that all the time. I see wide open, anonymous access for hackers, virus authors and identity thieves. Of course nearly any WiFi access point qualifies for that.

      I also see a viable network for distributed RFID readers to access their database back ends to make for greater ease in people tracking. I see web cameras, rather than the more costly dedicated units, all over the place, and the US becoming like the UK. I see the back end capability for the advertisement boards like in the Minority Report movie.

      All of these things are intrusive and to my mind not good. And I'm by no means a luddite. I can just see no good coming from this. Granted other than reasonable free Internet connectivity.

    8. Re:City Wide? by BigolFatty · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Don't be so down on Dayton. Sure this won't revitalize downtown or anything, but its a step. I'll bet the city will make more than 5k/month in sales taxes by people connecting at a coffee shop in the Oregon District or watching the Dragons at 5/3rd buying $5.50 beers. Dayton needs wi-fi users downtown to balance out the thugs. http://www.whiotv.com/news/4202035/detail.html

    9. Re:City Wide? by GreyPoopon · · Score: 2, Informative
      In these tight economic times, why would a city consider it a wise move to spend tax payer monies on project like this just escapes me.

      1. High-speed internet for poorer people who can barely even afford a PC. It's a pretty cheap way to offer self-improvement benefits and otherwise "look good" among some of the poorer voters.
      2. Bringing "customers" into the WiFi hot zone to patronize the local business just because they have connectivity there.

      Is it really THAT expensive to install and operate a city-wide wireless network? The $5000 per year that Dayton is paying is pure PEANUTS compared to some of the other things that money gets wasted on. They've probably wasted more than that on "entertainment" expenses run up by a single employee in the last two months.

      --

      GreyPoopon
      --
      Why is it I can write insightful comments but can't come up with a clever signature?

    10. Re:City Wide? by Rick.C · · Score: 3, Funny
      What more could I ask for?

      Fewer tornados?

      Yagi antennae attract tornados, you know.
      --
      You were 80% angel, 10% demon. The rest was hard to explain. - Over The Rhine
      "Math in a song is good."-Linford
    11. Re:City Wide? by akad0nric0 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is a great idea.

      I couldn't agree more. Many midwestern cities like Dayton and Cincinnati are experiencing a major problem getting people into their downtown entertainment districts outside of the 8-5, M-F work-week due to explosions in the suburbs. Offering something like this is a great way to improve publicity of the struggling city-centres and attract more revenue downtown. Even if it isn't heavily-used, its mere presence will be a boon to the downtown merchants.

      --
      akad0nric0

      This sentence no verb.
    12. Re:City Wide? by lovswr · · Score: 2

      Ok I grew up in the Gem City (as we like to call our selves & furthermore we got robbed in the NCCA regionals in 1985 but that is another story) & that area is approx 1 mile square. But the population density is nothing. There are approx 1M people in Montgomery County, but Dayton the city proper is gotta be bordering on barely above 100,000. now. Dayton is a heavy gm town. It used to be that just about every Fischer body, as well as every brake assm. that was on any GM vehicle as well as all DELCO (Dayton Electronics & yes Dayton Tires of gangster "Daytons" came from there to) but now there is only the S-10 plant where they make Trailblazers & Colorados left. The main population centers are in South Montgomery County, the Greene County/Montgomery County line & North West Montgomery County (Trotwood, Englewood, Vandallia etc) & they are all several miles from downtown. As amatter of fact, this area in the article is comprised of moslty what is known as East Dayton. In the best of times, they were not exectly the target demograpic group & nowadays... fugedaboutit. The Oregon distctict (literally about 800ft of the REBUILT cobblestone streets) is where the Wright Brothers had their bicycle shop & basically you only go that way as a short cut from say, 4th st on your way to Kettering {Patterson BLVD, Welcome Stadium, Stewart Street etc)

    13. Re:City Wide? by craters · · Score: 2, Informative

      Plans are for a 1 mile radius 'test' area for a few months, then if that goes well, expanded to cover a 55 mile radius. I read it in the local paper, couldn't find an online link to article though. I'll be interested as well how they stand up to local broadband providers. Verizon Wireless has already been promoting their new offering in this region.

    14. Re:City Wide? by kwerle · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I still don't see the great need for being connected like that all the time.

      There isn't. But it is fantastic to have it available anytime and anywhere you want it.

      I see wide open, anonymous access for hackers, virus authors and identity thieves. Of course nearly any WiFi access point qualifies for that.

      For that you can just go to your local library. Nothing new here - just easier access.

      I also see a viable network for distributed RFID readers to access their database back ends to make for greater ease in people tracking. I see web cameras, rather than the more costly dedicated units, all over the place, and the US becoming like the UK.

      Do you also see aliens? Seriously, you're just FUDing here.

      I see the back end capability for the advertisement boards like in the Minority Report movie.

      Specifically: when he walked into a store, he was greeted by name and asked whether or not he like the last thing he purchased. ie: he entered someone's personal property (the store), and the security/customer system identified him. Which is no different than having a guard/service rep at the entrance asking for your id and greeting you, except that it is automated. You don't like it, don't go in the store. It is private property.

      All of these things are intrusive and to my mind not good. And I'm by no means a luddite.

      All of those things are ONLY in your mind. All that is being offered here is city-wide WIFI. If that make you nervous, GET OUT NOW. There is already city-wide cellphone access. There is nearly Nationwide cellphone access. There is no difference between cellphone access and wifi access in terms of what they can do (allow you to connect to a network and send/receive data).

      Get over your luddite self.

      I can just see no good coming from this. Granted other than reasonable free Internet connectivity.

      And there you've just explained it. The only thing coming from this is reasonable free Internet connectivity. So you have nothing to worry about.

    15. Re:City Wide? by N3Bruce · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nah, what you really want is a dish. At 2.4 Ghz, a surplus Directv or similar dish with a patch antenna at the feed would be the real deal. Check out the K5OE Website for some ideas.

  2. History in the making by Anita+Coney · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is a BIG event in history. Quite possibly the largest event ever. For the first time in history, there is actually a good reason to live in Ohio!

    --
    If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    1. Re:History in the making by kc8apf · · Score: 2, Funny

      You mean the ice, snow, sleet, hail, rapid and large temperature changes, and lack of things to do weren't enough good reasons to live in Ohio?

      Unless you want to do RF research, go to one of a few quite good engineering schools, or just really enjoy using snow chains, you probably want to avoid Ohio even if it has free, public WiFi.

      --
      kc8apf
    2. Re:History in the making by iamwahoo2 · · Score: 3, Funny

      You are not allowed to use snow chains in Ohio.

    3. Re:History in the making by ShaniaTwain · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, that and the free porn on TV

    4. Re:History in the making by LWATCDR · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well there is the Air Force Museum and Wright Patterson AFB where they keep the UFO that crashed in New Mexico.
      Actually I have had to go to Ohio a few times and it was not that bad.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    5. Re:History in the making by bob670 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But if the job market keeps retracting like it has I won't be here much longer, can't afford to stay. And Cleveland is such a mess now and there seems to be no hope of it turning around yet a third time. Last one out of town shut out the lights...

    6. Re:History in the making by Jonny_eh · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What about Cedar Point? It's by far the coolest roller coaster park in North America (or even the world).

      But... I guess you don't have to LIVE in Ohio to visit the park, so nevermind!

  3. Hopefully... by jessecurry · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...this will become a model for other cities. I know how valuable my WiFi connection on campus and in my neighborhood has become. I would love to be able to sit downtown and know that I have internet access available.

    --
    Those who know, do not speak. Those who speak, do not know. ~Lao Tzu
    1. Re:Hopefully... by Cruithne · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I would too, in fact, I can definitely see making moving decisions in the future based on whether or not wifi is freely available in the municipality.

      I just hope this isnt something we look back on and say, "I really wish that ended up working."

    2. Re:Hopefully... by funk_doc · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm surprised that anyone here at /. would want municipal WiFi, other than the ever eluding Free Lunch. Lets take a look at some of the problems that will arise:

      Static IP and Port Forwarding. I'm sure that many of you forward ports through your router/firewall for certain applications (http, ftp...). I can guarantee that the municipality will not support this feature, and it would be impossible to get a static ip. Once the municipality monopolizes the market, there will be no competition from the private sector. You can't compete with free. While private companies in other areas offer new features, lower price and more bandwidth (they have to compete, remember) you will be stuck paying high prices (taxes) for a slow connection. While the idea of other people who don't use the internet paying for your BitTorrent downloads seems like a great idea, it will cost you more in the long run.

      Censorship. Once this municipality has the power to decide what you can and can't view on the internet, do you really think that it would never be abused. Some religious group will donate large amounts of money to a campaign, and the politician will have to repay that group with censorship legislation.

      Internet access may seem high right now, and it is. Competition is real, prices have and will continue to go down as features are being added. My Comcast connection used to cost $59/mo, now I have more bandwidth and it's only $20/mo. Government is never as efficient as the private sector, it will cost everyone much more to let the government supply WiFi rather than a private company. Also, when was the last time you heard of a government program living up to it's promise? Do you think that this would be any different?

    3. Re:Hopefully... by baudilus · · Score: 2, Insightful
      While your arguments have merit, you would do well to take a look at who is using the internet these days. The majority of users do not care about port forwarding, static IPs, and censorship. They just want to be able to read the news and do a little browsing. This will appeal GREATLY to the casual internet user, who browses very little, but doesn't want to pay for such little usage.

      And by the way...
      ...many of you forward ports through your router/firewall for certain applications (http, ftp...). I can guarantee that the municipality will not support this feature...

      Understand what port forwarding is, it wouldn't require any explicit "support" from a vendor, outside of having at least one incoming port open. And even if they did close ALL incoming ports, anyone that cares this can just pay for their access.

      And contrary to what you allude to in your first sentence, there are a lot of slashdot readers that wouldn't care. Heck, some of them are just casual browsers...
  4. Nice, but... by jargoone · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's cool that they're doing this, but the problem is, there's not really much reason to go downtown in Dayton. They just built the new ballpark, but other than that, it's really a pretty crappy place.

  5. Parking Lot LAN party! by Cruithne · · Score: 5, Funny

    Lets all do a parking lot lan party!

    Pay 4 bucks to park 24 hours, sit in your comfortable car with a laptop, and game it up on a free network... if only wireless didnt completely and totally suck for gaming :D

  6. Advertisers? by crow · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How do advertisers push their ads to the WiFi users?

  7. Legal Issues... by timtwobuck · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So what happens in any legal suit where there is unmonitored, illegal activity taking place over this network? Is the city liable?

    Is the city monitoring the traffic to prevent kids under the age of 18 from viewing illicit material?

    Will the RIAA come after them if someone uses this hardware to download illegal songs?

    1. Re:Legal Issues... by timeOday · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Is the city liable when drug dealers do business in a park?

    2. Re:Legal Issues... by timtwobuck · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The city is providing a service, something that doesn't exist freely.

      In your analogy to the park, if the town didn't provide the park, then they would go into the street, or if the street wasn't there then they would go into the woods. So them providing "space" is not something they can avoid.

      Now if the city was providing a large dome, under which there was no surveillance, no police, and nobody checking who goes in and out, and crimes are committed there, then yes, I would say they are liable for being negligent.

  8. A little skimpy on the details. by XxtraLarGe · · Score: 2, Informative

    For $5000, it sounds like a real bargain. The question is, how do advertisers make money on this to pick up the rest of the cost? I'll bet its not too long before the advertisers bail, and the city ends up picking up the tab. Any bets?

    --
    Taking guns away from the 99% gives the 1% 100% of the power.
  9. Government spaces by Shivetya · · Score: 4, Insightful

    most likely they get to advertise through other means, like stuffing fliers into mailings or hanging their company name on official web pages related to the project. Of course you have lots of little antenna around and the support crews can be branded as well.

    Plus being government there are probably some under the table considerations like zoning issues, fees, and similar. Remember a government providing an incentive or discount is not spending any taxpayer money. That is similar to what Washington does by labeling as a program spending cut the simple fact of not increasing the allocation of funds to it.

    --
    * Winners compare their achievements to their goals, losers compare theirs to that of others.
  10. 1 mile radius == entire city by 0kComputer · · Score: 2, Informative

    I don't know if you've ever been to dayton (i went to UD), but I'm not sure I'd use the word "city" to describe it. I went to school there, and if I remember the Oregon district was tough to find because if you blinked at the wrong time you may miss it. Don't get me wrong, this is definately cool, but just keep in mind that Dayton isn't exactly a thriving metropolis.

    --
    Top 10 Reasons To Procrastinate
    10.
  11. Advertising by The+Amazing+Fish+Boy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I don't use hotspots, really, but anyone know how the advertising works? Is it like the old free-dialup schemes where you would always have an ad on screen? You would have to install a program to get access. If so, this probably wouldn't be compatible with Mac or Linux?

    Can't find this in TFA, all I can get is:

    "HarborLink will basically offer some advertising to the end user to offset the cost that would normally have been passed on to the user. This allows the service to be offered at no cost.

    1. Re:Advertising by miyako · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Just a guess, but I would imagine that access goes through a proxy, and the advertisers pay for ads on the proxy. Either they replace banner ads (not sure if this is even legal or not), or they just have it so that whenever you go to a site, you get a page with an ad that then redirects you to your site.
      This might not even be that bad of a thing if the majority of the ads came from stores in the area, people would get (semi) relevant ads for stores in their immediate location, and could even help the economy in the area.

      --
      Famous Last Words: "hmm...wikipedia says it's edible"
  12. Mirrored links by winkydink · · Score: 3, Informative

    _Bunny writes "The City of Dayton, Ohio announced a plan to make all of downtown a WiFi hotspot - and as of last week, the network is live. This makes Dayton the first Ohio city to offer free WiFi access. Approximately one square mile of downtown is now live, including Firth Third Field, the Oregon District, Webster Station and RiverScape. The WiFi project is a public/private partnership not funded by taxpayers, and comes at no charge to the end user." (According to the linked story at WHIO-TV, the city is actually paying about $5,000 per year, with advertisers picking up the rest of the tab.)

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

  13. Countdown in 3, 2, 1... by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 2, Funny

    For the randroids that will start bitching about this new network and how it prevents private companies from creating viable, competing WiFi networks in Dayton.

  14. Are the telecoms asleep?? by the_rajah · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'd think they be all over this like a duck on a Junebug as they in some of the other cities where the municipality tried to provide this service and got stomped all over. Perhaps Dayton is more on the ball and managed to present a fait accompli. Good for them!

    "Do the Right Thing. It will gratify some people and astound the rest." - Mark Twain

    --


    "Do the Right Thing. It will gratify some people and astound the rest." - Mark Twain
  15. That's nice, but the plans are just Pipe Dreams by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    To get attention. There's no way the broadband industry will permit this. Check the massive campaign they've done (via Republican legislators) in Philadelphia and Houston to prevent municipal WiFi there.

    1. Re:That's nice, but the plans are just Pipe Dreams by General+Alcazar · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If people vote to force themselves to give money to corporations, rather than become more efficient and save money for the community, then they are more stupid than can be believed.

    2. Re:That's nice, but the plans are just Pipe Dreams by justin12345 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No offense, but I really get annoyed with people who expunge this sort of reductionist view of the democratic process.

      It would be one thing to make the statement you made if there was a referendum on the issue; but in reality the decision is being made be the legislature. A legislature who is being heavily lobbied by the telecommunications (mostly Verizon) companies to block public WiFi. "People" don't really have a say except perhaps to not reelect their representative, something I seriously doubt their representative is sweating over considering not a large enough segment of the population even knows what WiFi is.

      Lets say you are on the state legislature of Pennsylvania. On one hand there is a non-profit group trying to WiFi Phily. On the other is Verizon with enough money and power to do whatever they want with your career for good or ill, and they don't like the idea. You are serving on the state legislature, not a position that affords you much power, job security, or prestige.

      Having public WiFi in Phily might be good for you, the project might get enough attention that everyone involved comes out looking so good that Verizon isn't a problem. But thats a big "might". Are you going to take that risk?

      Phily is not a wealthy city. Most of it is sprawling ghetto. Many of the residents do not own computers and have never even heard of WiFi. The ones that have heard of it can mostly afford to pay for it. You aren't going to get too many votes for supporting the Non-profit from the city itself.

      The only way this is going to turn into a substantial amount of votes for you is if the project becomes a media circus. For that to happen it has to be sold as a bill that will make Philadelphia a "city of the future" or it has to be sold as you going toe to toe with big bad Verizon. The city of the future thing is good but the Verizon thing is better, but carries significant risk to you.

      It comes down to whether "you" in the Pennsylvania legislature think its a good idea to take on Verizon. You might, but even if you do its going to take some balls.

      Last I heard the PA legislature does have a set, kinda. From what I read the Phily WiFi project is going to be allowed to move forward, though similar efforts elsewhere in the state are going to be banned. Its not exactly a great precedent for public WiFi, and similar debates are being held all over the country. Ultimately most of the decisions are going to be made by the politicians involved and the will of the people will not be their primary concern.

      --
      Cool art gallery, if you're into that sort of thing.
  16. Corpus Christi TX just did this by alispguru · · Score: 2, Informative

    See "a herf="http://www.downtowncorpuschristi.com/wiki/DM D/WiFiCity">here. It's free for now and covers the whole downtown area.

    --

    To a Lisp hacker, XML is S-expressions in drag.
  17. Not the smartest idea this... by suitepotato · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...letting the government provide your electronic information access is like letting the tax authorities be your bank and accountant. What was that phrase I was looking for..? Oh yes, It's the fox guarding the henhouse.

    AFAIC, it's for nothing unless you use secure tunnels and proxies to keep them from snooping on you. No, this isn't tinfoil hate time. This is plain old reality. I love my country, but I fear my government as I should. I can't see the same dingbats who can't get water fountains in the parks fixed within five years as being trustworthy with a cordless phone never mind my Internet access. No thanks.

    --
    If my grammar and spelling are off, I am [distracted/tired/careless] (take your pick)
    1. Re:Not the smartest idea this... by imsabbel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yeah, right.
      Just like it is so stupid to let the government defend you, make laws, build streets, educate children...
      its the FUCKING job of a government to provide basic sevices to the people. And now internet access is one of those

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
  18. so easy by rootedgimp · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yay! Yet another unsecure wifi point to pwn people from... Too bad I dont live in Ohio. Err wtf am I saying?

    Anyway. I dont see what the big deal about this is, talk about simple shit to set up. Installed a dlink dwl7200 at a golf course the other day that will reach a lil over 5 football fields long that was only like 820$... Hrm yeah I was right:
    802.11a/g (Full Power with 5dBi gain diversity dualband dipole antenna)
    Indoors:
    98ft (30m) @ 54Mbps
    112ft (34m) @ 48Mbps
    128ft (39m) @ 36Mbps
    154ft (47m) @ 24Mbps
    184ft (56m) @ 18Mbps
    217ft (66m) @ 12Mbps
    259ft (79m) @ 9Mbps
    325ft (99m) @ 6Mbps
    Outdoors:
    367ft (112m) @ 54Mbps
    820ft (250m) @ 18Mbps
    1640ft (500m) @ 6Mbps


    I must say though, this is an awful idea. Wireless internet has to be the best ticket out of jail for criminals since lawyers.

  19. Booyaka! Home, sweet home by AJYeary · · Score: 2, Funny

    Woot! It's not every day that my hometown is on the front page of Slashdot.

    Although I wish my submission would've been the one that was accepted. Oh well, I can hope for the dupe :-p

    ~aj~

  20. And the answer is... by fm6 · · Score: 3, Funny

    That's a good question. Answering it should help one or two lawyers put their kids through college.

  21. Similar Idea by ziploclogic · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm working with local business in Downtown Parkersburg, WV to do the same thing. However, a few local business are already doing this for-fee. Anyone have any input regarding our stepping on the toes of these companies?

    http://www.ezwv.com/
    http://www.wirefire.com/
    http://www.sequelle.net/

    I've never done anything like this so I'm curious if anyone has an opinion what precautions I should take to protect myself. We're trying to roll this out as quickly as possible as a movie begins filming in out humble town this month. We think we'll be able to draw a lot of attention to "ground-zero" for our network which just happens to be our Cultural Arts Center and the location for a film festival going on at the end of the month.

    TIA

  22. The big unanswered question... by fm6 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How many users can a free public WiFi network handle before it's saturated and becomes unusable?

  23. Uhm.. ok by geoffeg · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Have you ever been to downtown Dayton? It's not exactly a hot bed of internet users. There's very little residential and most of the businesses are most likely not of the internet-based variety. I think a different city would have benefited more.

    Although there *is* Mendelsons. Where old stuff from the Wright Patt air force base goes to die.. a huge warehouse..

    1. Re:Uhm.. ok by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 2, Funny
      I think a different city would have benefited more.

      And Dayton should have funded this for some other city?

  24. How free is it? by wlvdc · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "... The WiFi project is a public/private partnership not funded by taxpayers, and comes at no charge to the end user."

    How can something be publicly funded without tax payers money? And than the cost of the decision making process of the council, admin, p.r. etc.

    "(According to the linked story at WHIO-TV, the city is actually paying about $5,000 per year, with advertisers picking up the rest of the tab.)"

    How do advertisers make money? Do users have to accept ads to enjoy a 'free' service? How free is it? Can I use VOIP? Can I do anything I like?

    In the statement of the city of Dayton it reads: "We also believe offering this type of exciting, pioneering service will go a long way toward helping Dayton attract that 'creative class' of people who will help fuel our community's future success."

    Not sure if WiFi can provide sufficient bandwidth for such ambitions...

    --
    -- Neminem laede, immo omnes, quantum potes, iuva.
  25. No problems with Hotspots by pavon · · Score: 2, Informative

    The telcoms have no problems with WiFi hotspots because the city pays for the connection that is feeding the WAP. As far as they are concerned, the city is just another customer. Where they have a problem is when the city tries to compete with them by providing the broadband connections themselves.

  26. Dayton by UDGags · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I went to UD (University of Dayton) and now currently work at UDRI. This is cool but as people has mentioned Dayton is not that big of a place but if you go away from the places listed you can hit up Starbucks, Panera and then UD all have wireless access. So a good portion of business area is covered.

  27. Dayton and the Universe by thomasa · · Score: 2, Informative

    Edgar Cayce once said that Dayton, Ohio was the center of the universe. Maybe it was at one time. It was the home of 5 fortune 500 companies, it was the home of the (generally accepted) inventors of the first powered flight machine called the aeroplane. It was important to the computer industry - NCR is still here and U.S. Navy Bombe used in code breaking was built here. But the automobile which was very connected to Dayton Ohio through General Motors and its divisions helped depopulate the city. The surrounding county is doing fairly well however. Montgomery county which contains Dayton, Ohio has a population of 550,000. Dayton, Ohio has a population of 166,000. Dayton proper used to have a population over 200,000.

  28. Re:Too bad Dayton's dead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You haven't been downtown lately it would seem. Afte r the completion of Fifth Third Field,the new Performing Arts Center, and Riverside downtown Dayton has definetly been on an upswing the last couple of years. Back in 1999 when I first started going to school there it was trashy and sketchy, but by the time I graduated it was a pleasure to go down there. It's easy to take a shot at an old midwestern city of industry, but your lack of recent experience and stereotyping is disgusting.

  29. Not True! by moultano · · Score: 3, Informative

    Cincinnati's got Graeter's, which is the best icecream in the world flat out.

    Cincinnati's also got a excellent art museum, one of the best zoos in the country, great public libraries, and that wonderful heartwarming Skyline Chili.

    Dayton on the other hand . . . hmm.

  30. not sure by jafac · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm all for making wi-fi highly and widely available, but what happens when someone comes along and uses this as a way to censor content, or worse, gather private information? What happens when some Free Market Fundamentalist gets elected in Dayton, and hands over the whole shebang, built at public expense, to a private operator?

    Build it, sure, but when you add-in controls to prevent these kinds of abuses, it's going to make the whole operation look less efficient (thus validating the claims of the Free Market Fundamentalists).

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  31. Try Athens GA by olcrazypete · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Athens Ga has one of the best downtowns I've ever experienced, wireless or not, drunk or not. About a year or two ago, the University of Georgia expanded its wireless cloud over the downtown area of the city. Sitting outside of a coffee shop with a powerbook getting schoolwork done rocks bigtime. No, the city of athens didn't pay for it, but its there and is worth a good look.

    http://www.nmi.uga.edu/mmc/inside.php?s=environmen t&p=3/

    --
    -- My dog can beat up your dog.
  32. You don't wanna go Downtown by CaseyABretti · · Score: 2, Informative

    Downtown Dayton is having a huge problem with crime. In Mid-February, there was a huge (50+ people) fight with people injured and thrown in jail. Right in the center of Downtown is a bus hub, where there is a huge gathering of somewhat questionable folk.. that's how the fight got started. Drug deals go on down there frequently. We're talking a four or five block range... it's not a huge area, yet it's saturated with problems. I don't know about you, but I have no desire to leave my suburbian apartment and take my $2k laptop downtown and run the risk of getting mugged, raped, whatever. I've lived in/around Dayton all my life, and grew up in one of the rougher neighborhoods (Trotwood)... When I say it's bad down there... it's bad.

  33. For all the gripers by hanshotfirst · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Let this be a reply to multiple "why is the gov't involved?" threads.

    You are free to disagree with me, of course.

    Municipal Wi-Fi is no different (in my mind) than any other municipal service:
    Street Lights. ("I never drive on 3rd avenue, why should I have to pay to light it?")
    Police and Fire Service ("I've never been mugged, why pay for police?")
    "Gov't should stay out of utilities!" Then stop taking showers, flushing your toilet, and take your garbage to the dump in your tiny little hybrid.

    Now, some city services are paid for out of general taxe revenue (Police, Fire, Gargbage, in my area). Other services are paid based on usage (Water & Sewer in my area). Either way money goes to the local gov't for the service, and the city or county pays the utility provider.

    Municipal Wi-Fi would work no differently. Which payment model it should use is certainly open for debate, but as a concept, why shouldn't my city provide connectivity for the masses?

    Security - yeah, there will be problems and challenges. But these can be dealt with. Do you just squat down on any old public toilet in the park without checking the seat first? No different here. Alternatively, I can drink city water out of the tap, with a certain amount of particulate and distate, or I can install a water softener and Brita filter if I want cleaner water than the city provides.

    --
    Why, oh why, didn't I take the Blue Pill?
  34. Re:Dayton by lovswr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Actually it was not WPAB (which was SAC Command) but the Monsanto Mound works. Of the few companies in the US that made detonators for our nuclear arsenal that was one of them. I can't rembmer the street name but it was near the Fischer body plant & the closed DP&L Hutchinson power station. They had some model airplane parks right across the street that my Dad took me to back in the early 70's.

  35. More on WPAFB, Mound Lab by reallocate · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Wright-Patt's SAC sqaudron (B-52's) was dispersed to Minot AFB and elsewhere well before the Cold War concluded (although doubt that had much of an impact on the Soviet's targetting plans). The SAC squadron was always a relatively small part of the base's function. You could work there for years and the only B-52 you might see would be flying overhead. It was, and is, a large logistics and research management facility. The Materiel (or is Logistics these days?) Command is headquarted there, as well as Systems Command. The front offices of many USAF weapons and research systems are also located there. (I.e., a lot of the stuff that flies at Edwards is managed at WPAFB.)

    Monsanto's Mound Lab was located south of Dayton along the Miami River in Miamisburg on Mound Avenue (the "Mound" is an ancient Moundbuilder burial cite). I know the plutonium cells that powered some satellites and space probes were constructed there.

    --
    -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
  36. Goin' to Visit Grandpa! by Aetrix · · Score: 2, Funny

    Maybe I will go visit my grandfather in Dayton now...

    --

    "One touch of Darwin makes the whole world kin." George Bernard Shaw