Slashdot Mirror


Anti-DMCA Petition in Canadian Parliament

Matthew Skala writes "Last month we heard that the Canadian government is rejecting some of the worst features of the DMCA (more analysis here), but with Heritage Minister Liza Frulla parroting the media-cartel lobby with a promise to "give the tools to companies and authors to sue" and persuade children that downloading music for free is morally wrong even though it's presently legal in Canada, the battle is far from won. Yesterday, Member of Parliament Peter Julian (Burnaby-New Westminster, NDP) introduced the first batch of signatures on Digital Copyright Canada's Petition for Users' Rights. This isn't just a Web click-through petition that politicians can freely ignore; more than a thousand real hardcopy signatures have already been collected from Canadian residents opposed to further expansion of copyright privileges, and the campaign is hoping for many more. Additional coverage on p2pnet.net."

59 of 409 comments (clear)

  1. Legal vs. moral by October_30th · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Uh, what kind of an argument is that?

    If something's legal, it doesn't mean it's also moral and conversely, doing the morally right thing might not be legal at the time.

    --
    The owls are not what they seem
    1. Re:Legal vs. moral by camkind · · Score: 5, Funny

      As Rev. Lovejoy once said to Marge

      "Once something has been approved by the Government, It's no longer immoral."

    2. Re:Legal vs. moral by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Of course, what you're ignoring or unaware of is that every piece of writable media sold in canada includes a tax that is specifically to pay for the music you will place on it.

      So now that you've bought your shiny CD and paid for the music, what's immoral about putting music on it?

      Perhaps you can say its immoral to put music on CDs, but then would it not also be immoral for the music cartels to get your tax money that you paid for putting music on CDs?

      It seems whatever moral high ground you're standing on is made of sand. Better fix your position before you've got nothing left under your feet ;)

    3. Re:Legal vs. moral by Embedded2004 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why is it immoral to download music? I pay for it when ever I purchase blank CDs, if they don't like it then stop taking my money when I buy blanks.

      The only thing immoral is stealing my money when I buy blanks.

    4. Re:Legal vs. moral by maxpublic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      technically legal to steal the music up there

      It isn't stealing in Canada, by definition. Your opinion does not make law.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    5. Re:Legal vs. moral by satherto · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually it is moral to burn music for free in Canada, as we pay a surcharge on every blank CD, Cassette tape, and VCR tape to give to the artists. The reason it is legal and moral, is that the work has been paid for MANY times over due to the levy.

      As has been stated many times, the levy goes to the copywrite holders (in Canada) not to the government.

      It is (IMHO) that it is immoral to take our money and then try to convince us that we can't use what we have purchased.

      --
      ----
    6. Re:Legal vs. moral by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If it really was thievery, that is.

      To me, it's the equivalent of someone photocopying Dilbert from the news paper, and passing it out during business meetings, etc.

      or someone taking the newspaper from the breakroom, photocopying Dilbert, and adding it to his Dilbert collection, perhaps even scanning it and leaving it on an obscure page in his website, for people he wants to have. Why is not important in this case.

      I mention this because the issue of photocopied comic strips getting distributed in offices has come before the courts in the past, as has the RIAA/ASCAP/BMI suing companies where an employee has had a radio playing at a loud enough level for employees to hear, perhaps because the Muzak salesman was rebuffed...

      If I take your CD collection, *THAT* is thievery.
      If I reattribute my CD music collection as being of my own creation (music, lyrics, recording, etc.), *THAT* is thievery.

      While the artists tend to have "copyright" for the music and lyrics of their works, the fact is that the recording distributor has been assigned copyright for the recordings. The artists do not have copyright possession on their recordings.

      It's like people essentially advocating felony-level punishment for a mere +5MPH speeding violation. Yes, it's a "crime", but it's not a Crime. Too many people have lost sight of that.

      Next time you're in a restaraunt for a birthday celebration, especially if it's a national chain, get the waitstaff to also sing "Happy Birthday" with you, in addition to whatever they have for a birthday act. Blammo, commercial performance of someone's copyrighted song.

  2. Teaching right from wrong by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 5, Funny

    From the article:


    She [Liza Frulla] said she wanted to make it her mission to persuade children that downloading music for free is wrong.


    Mabye she could start up a hip, happening new ad campaign like the SPA's Don't Copy that Floppy.

    Mabye it will be just as effective, too.

    Mabye I'm a Chinese jet pilot.
    --
    ____

    ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    1. Re:Teaching right from wrong by 01000011011101000111 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Even better - persuade all music ever released to carry a little black and white warning label saying "Parental Advisory - Listening prohibited" :)

      --
      Programming is an Art. I am an Artist. Does that mean I get to wear a daft hat?
    2. Re:Teaching right from wrong by WillerZ · · Score: 2, Funny

      They're saying stealing cars is OK? Cool.

      Up next "Pinch my ride!"

      --
      I guess today is a passable day to die.
  3. I'm downloading the petition now. by ahsile · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And plan to sign it, and have everyone I know sign it. I won't have my rights stepped on without a fight. Who knows, maybe parliment will even reject the WIPO changes.

    1. Re:I'm downloading the petition now. by ShaniaTwain · · Score: 4, Funny

      See this just doesnt seem right. Canadians are supposed to be passive and polite to a fault. Americans are supposed to be Freedom loving individuals that hate big government interfering in their life. Where am I? bizzaro world?

      Ah well, at least the Canadians aren't burning down the white house anymore..

    2. Re:I'm downloading the petition now. by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you replace 'passive' with 'not antagonistic' then you have it right.

      Oh, and I think the Republican attempt to have the *federal* executive and legislative branches overturn a *state* *judicial* matter gives lie to that other bit.

      Man, a hundred years ago, an attempt like that would have seen armed citizens in the streets.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    3. Re:I'm downloading the petition now. by maxpublic · · Score: 4, Funny

      Ah well, at least the Canadians aren't burning down the white house anymore..

      And this is a good thing???

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    4. Re:I'm downloading the petition now. by Kwil · · Score: 4, Insightful

      By that argument, it was also the British who fought for independance.

      --

      That Jesus Christ guy is getting some terrible lag... it took him 3 days to respawn! -NJ CoolBreeze

    5. Re:I'm downloading the petition now. by Binestar · · Score: 2, Funny

      By that argument, it was also the British who fought for independance.

      And they sure did kick their own asses!

      --
      Do you Gentoo!?
    6. Re:I'm downloading the petition now. by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 2, Informative
      Are you absolutely sure that the "fansub" was really a fan-produced version? On occasion, the fansubs that you can get on the internet are actually just rips of a DVD from one of the Asian markets that happens to include English subs. Most of the reputable places that host fansubs try to weed those out, but if you downloaded them from usenet or IRC, that might have been what you ended up with.

      Not saying that's neccessarily what happened here, but that would be my first guess given the situation you described. If you're really interested, you could contact the company that has the legitimate rights to distribute the show in the US, and ask whether the DVD you bought was legit or not.

      --

      How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
    7. Re:I'm downloading the petition now. by Yaztromo · · Score: 4, Informative
      British Troops burned the white house (canada wasnt a country in the war of 1812, still a british territory).

      no, im not a history geek....

      And boy, does it show.

      At the time of the War of 1812, there were two territories with the name "Canada" in them -- Upper Canada, and Lower Canada. People who lived in those territories were known as "Canadians" (or, in the case of Lower Canada, "les Canadiens").

      A group can be a people with having a nation. Ever hear of the Kurds? The Palestinians? The Welsh?

      There was a Canada before Confederation, and the people who lived there were Canadians. Yes, they were British subjects (although their loyalties to the British crown certain varied -- Native Canadians and French Canadians also participated in the War, but generally held no special loyalty to the crown), but there is nothing preventing anyone from calling them "Canadians", and being perfectly understandable and correct when they do so.

      Yaz.

    8. Re:I'm downloading the petition now. by the+arbiter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Damn, I'm in exactly the same musician boat as you are. Former pro, no rights to anything I worked on in the past. The terms of the contract weren't merely onerous: We received 5% of NET revenue, with all production expenses to be repaid.

      You do the math, dear reader. For every one million dollars of revenue received by the record company, we got $50,000, to be split four ways. And we had to repay the recording, production and artwork expenses (also note we couldn't shop around to get the best rates on these things, either...we had to use the facilities that the company mandated).

      In my book, that's nothing but slavery.

      I love the responses I get when I bring this up: "You shouldn't have signed a contract like that". You're right, I should have worked at McDonalds instead. FOR THE MUSICIAN, THE OPTION IS SIGN OR DON'T WORK. People don't understand. "Monopoly" is not a strong enough word for it, and neither is "stranglehold".

      The artists are not getting ripped off from file sharing. We got ripped off a long time ago, and it wasn't by our listeners.

      All copyright does is insure that I'll NEVER make any money off my work. That privilege belongs to the record company, which will own and profit from MY work for the rest of my life plus some number of years afterwards.

      You tell me...is this fair? Is this how copyright is supposed to work? Because to me it looks like someone stole from me and it's perfectly legal.

      --
      Boycott everything - they're all trying to fuck you one way or another
  4. Canada Rocks by ip_freely_2000 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Excepting for the political thieves involved in the Sponsorship scandal, sometimes we get things right. Canada has great fair-use laws and politicians seem to know we the voters like it that way.

    1. Re:Canada Rocks by tim256 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      It does sound like Canada has a much better government than the US. Here are some things I think make the Canadian govt. better.
      1. Great fair-use laws and smarter politicians who don't work for the corporate machine.
      2. Universal health care sounds nice, and if you want super good health care you can go south and pay extra.
      3. Small military doesn't waste tons of money and people fighting wars in far away lands.
      4. Resonable drinking age of 19, as the highway dept. funding is not controlled by M.A.D.
      5. The Canadian govt. is not controlled by religious conservatives.

      Here are some bad things about Canada.

      1. It's full of Canadians.
      2. It's gets really cold.
      3. Lots of French people in Canada.
    2. Re:Canada Rocks by saforrest · · Score: 4, Funny

      Lots of French people in Canada.

      For God's sake, they've been here for four hundred years!

      At this point they're about as French as English-speaking North America is British, no matter what Triumph the Insult Comic Dog says.

  5. Here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny
    let me save you guys some time.

    • Why cant the USA be more like Canada?
    • Why do all the places with the best governments have the worst weather?
    • You like Canada so much, go move there!

    Enjoy.
  6. Re:The NDP isn't in power. by ytwang · · Score: 5, Informative

    The NDP isn't irrelevant. The current government has a minority of seats, so if all the opposition parties vote against a proposed piece of legislation, then it won't pass.

  7. Signatures by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 3, Funny
    more than a thousand real hardcopy signatures have already been collected from Canadian residents

    Shoot, that's half the country right there alrady opposed to it!

    --
    If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
  8. Re:The NDP isn't in power. by Ubergrendle · · Score: 4, Informative

    Except we currently have a minority government, which means the Liberals have to tread very carefully to avoid losing the confidence of the house.

    Also, given the latest sponsorship scandal (biggest scandal in Canadian politics in the last 10, maybe 20 years) the opposition parties will be looking for publically popular positions to use to 'gang up' on the ruling party.

    This petition has some weight given its timing, and private member's bills have been known to successfully be passed...especially during minority governments.

    --
    John Maynard Keynes: "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?"
  9. Re:The NDP isn't in power. by JustDisGuy · · Score: 4, Informative
    "The NDP isn't in power...and is therefore irrelevant in a Parliamentary system"

    Erm - WTF are you talking about? This isn't an "NDP" initiative, and even if it were our government is currently a MINORITY government, which gives all MP's, especially those sitting in opposition, significantly more power.

    While I do not doubt that the politicians WILL ignore it, I think they do so at their peril. And just because I have no hope that they will lend credence to the petition does not mean I will not get everyone I know to sign it and send it to Parliament Hill in my MP's hands.
    --
    "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity." - Hanlon's Razor
  10. Laws based on Morals. by ShaniaTwain · · Score: 4, Funny

    All laws should be based on morals. its the moral thing to do. otherwise the cavity of immorality will rot away the molars of our morals.

    1. Re:Laws based on Morals. by xander2032 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But who can say what's moral? There's so many different versions of "morality" that it's impossibe to pick just one.

      Anyways... I find that morality seems to always infringe on a person's rights and freedoms. Some may say flag burning is immoral or that saying something insulting about our government is immoral.

      So you see, you can't simply force a set of moral upon an entire population.

      Morality is a personal choice. If someone chooses not to be moral, well there's no way you're going to force them to have a sense of morality.

      Part of freedom is being free to choose, and in this case being free to choose what you think is moral and immoral.

    2. Re:Laws based on Morals. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      > I find that morality seems to always infringe on a person's rights and freedoms.

      I find also that my morals are always infringing on my own rights and freedoms. Which is weird, because they're my morals, so they're right, but also they're wrong.

      > So you see, you can't simply force a set of moral upon an entire population.

      Not simply. It takes a lot of weaponry and planning.

      > Morality is a personal choice.

      OK.

      > If someone chooses not to be moral,
      > well there's no way you're going to force them to have a sense of
      > morality.

      Wait. So morality exists, and people choose to be moral or immoral? If morality exists absolutely, then how can you force morality onto someone? They either choose to be moral, or not.

      > Part of freedom is being free to choose

      All of freedom is being free to choose. That's it.

      > and in this case being free to choose what you think is moral and immoral.

      So if I choose to have no sense of morality, then what have I chosen?

      You're confusing me. Stop it.

    3. Re:Laws based on Morals. by Derekloffin · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I think we'd like to think laws should be based on morals, but really they aren't and nor can they be.

      The reason for this is much of morality is the simply belief that X is right and Y is wrong intrisically. However, much of that can't be proven, and doesn't really hold up in a multicultural society where much of our beliefs of right and wrong can shift.

      So, instead, laws are based usually on a lowest common point of morals which a large majority can agree on, plus some ethical considerations that say you can at least attempt some kind of proof that Y is wrong based on a larger principle.

    4. Re:Laws based on Morals. by rpresser · · Score: 2, Funny

      > So you see, you can't simply force a set of moral upon an entire population.

      Not simply. It takes a lot of weaponry and planning.

      BWAHAHAHAHA! Funniest thing I've read all week!
  11. Virtue of a Parliamentary System of Democracy by amigoro · · Score: 2, Interesting
    This is what the US lacks. In a Parliamentary System the Members of Parliament (MPs) try to do something every term to make sure that their name gets wide recognition so that they have to spend less money campaigning for relection.

    I honestly don't think the MP in questions gives a damn about the rights of the listeneres. But at least he is doing something for whihc people would remember him, in a positive light.

    British style Parliaments have their own problems, but I think Canada has quite successfully implemented that by using the PR system.

    --


    Nothing to see here
  12. 1000 Signatures... by BJZQ8 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    1000 signatures! Wow! We're at .003 percent of the population! Unfortunately, I believe the various pro-DMCA lobbies have a lot more weight in the form of dollars...a few million Canadian dollars still is a lot of money.

    1. Re:1000 Signatures... by Jardine · · Score: 2, Interesting

      1000 signatures! Wow! We're at .003 percent of the population! Unfortunately, I believe the various pro-DMCA lobbies have a lot more weight in the form of dollars...a few million Canadian dollars still is a lot of money.

      Something you should know about political contributions in Canada. There are strict limits on how much a company (or an individual) can contribute to politicians. Last I checked, it was something like $10,000 per party.

      In theory, this is supposed to prevent politicians from being bought. It has flaws, but it does mean we don't end up with people like Senator Orrin Hatch in charge.

  13. Canada Icon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Isn't it about time that Slashdot gets a 'Canada' Topic Icon? We have a USA one.

    I mean, how many YRO stories involve Canada doing something we wish was happening here? Don't we get more 'Canada' stories than, say, 'Transmeta' stories or 'Geeks in Space' stories?

  14. NDP took opposite stand during election by Proaxiom · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Peter Julian's stand is a little odd consider the NDP supported ratification of the WIPO treaty that mandates a ban on anti-circumvention technology.

    In any case, no matter what Liz Frulla is saying to appease the lobby groups, if the legislation sticks to the proposed plan there should be no problem.

    And what the article summary appears to have missed is that one of the things in the plan is to close the loophole that probably makes unauthorized downloading of copyrighted music legal in Canada.

    This should go hand-in-hand with repealing the blank media levy, since it is supposed to be linked to the legalization of 'private copying', but no word on that yet.

    Not that I'd expect it, though, the government has never met a tax dollar it didn't like.

  15. Won't someone PLEASE think of the children? by ortholattice · · Score: 2, Funny
    [Frulla] said she wanted to make it her mission to persuade children that downloading music for free is wrong.

    "Everything starts with the children," she said. "They're the ones who say `recycle' and `don't smoke.' The Internet is their world."

    Ah, yes, the children, and all the terrible things that might happen to them if this isn't passed.

    1. Re:Won't someone PLEASE think of the children? by McLuhanesque · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, nearly 300 names on the NEXT batch of petitions that are about to be presented in the House WERE collected by, not quite a child, but a 15 year old, namely, my daughter. As part of her high school civics course, she got involved with Digital Copyright Canada and circulated the petition, singly collecting the most signatures of anyone in the campaign.

      At a recent conference on copyright at University of Toronto's Faculty of Law, she buttonholed the former chair of the standing committee, Sarmite Bulte, and put the hard questions to her about ISP notice and takedown (now notice and notice), the extra levy to educational institutions, and the threat to innovation.

      So the issue is not "please think of the children," but rather, "Please, the children are thinking!"

  16. I hope America decides to butt in... by Atroxodisse · · Score: 5, Funny

    I hope the American lobby tries to butt in to get Canada to make more severe copyright laws because speaking as a Canadian, nothing makes us more stubborn than when America tries to make us do something we haven't made up our minds on. End result, no additional copyright laws.

    --
    Read my short stories - You won't regret it.
  17. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  18. Weather The NDP is in power or not... by Wacky_Wookie · · Score: 3, Informative

    Peter Julian is the Member Parliament (MP) for that area. So anyone who gets 25 or more signitures for there area must take their copy of the petition to their MP, weather their in "power" or not!

    My MP (Jaff Brya Victoria-Becon Hill, [Libral]) happens to be a member of the ruling party, and ther more MP's whose contsituants ask their MP's to Present the petition to Parliament the stronger it looks!

    Here is the Cool part: If I am correct, only 25 signitures are needed for each MP, so the more Rideings (Canadian for an MP's electoral district) who collect signitures, the better!

    Copied from MY OWN AC post cus I forgot to turn cookies on in Firefox!

  19. Ive done it by crabpeople · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just printed off the petition, passed it around the department to sign and then gave it to the shipping department to mail out.

    Total time: 25 minutes
    Cost to me: 50cents (postage)

    Feeling empowered istead of victimized: Priceless

    theres some laws you cant buy, for everything else theres internet petitions

    --
    I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
    1. Re:Ive done it by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 2, Funny
      25 minutes spending dicking around instead of working: $8.00

      Postage: $0.50

      Employees dumb enough to brag about their slackness on Slashdot so that you can conveniently round them up and fire them: priceless

      There are some forms of misbehavior you can't punish. For everything else, there's Human Resources.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  20. Off-topic but needs to be said by PChemGuy · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I am a Canadian living in the US. I'm really tired of seeing comments like this from people on both sides of the border. For Americans, Canada is not the simple nation that some of you view it to be. It is also not the crime-free utopia that I hear about all the time. For most Canadians, you don't know half as much about the US as you think you do. The US is a much better country than prevailing attitudes would have you believe.

    We could all learn a lot more about each other if we got rid of these attitudes and spent a little time getting to know one another's countries.

    1. Re:Off-topic but needs to be said by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Here here. I've lived in various parts of the US for months at a time for work projects, and I meet people all the time who don't even know where Canada is, let alone ANYTHING about its culture or people.

      Meanwhile, there is a real trend in Canada to label anyone who criticizes American policies or actions as "anti-American" and it sickens me. American political decisions often have far reaching effects in Canada, but the US government never considers this when they make them (as is their right), but when Canada makes decisions that may affect the USA (such as legalizing marijuana, not supporting missile defence, etc) it is attacked by the Conservative elite as being "anti-American". It seems almost as if the millionaires who run our government really dont think Canada should be allowed to make its own decisions.

  21. Re:It isn't stealing by October_30th · · Score: 3, Interesting
    In Canada we even even have the blank media levy (tax) to pay the copyright holders for their work.

    Yep. We have the same thing and IIRC the official line is that it doesn't entitle us to copy copyrighted material except for our own private use. It's not an excuse to burn copies of an audio CD to your friends outside the immediate family, for instance. That's copyright infringement.

    Interestingly, our taxi companies also have to pay for the music if the drivers want to have a radio on while driving around with a customer. It's deemed as public performance. More recently, churches and kindergartens have also been asked to pay if they wish "to perform" (ie. sing) copyrighted hymns and songs for children. No, that's not a joke. They tried this already a few years ago but that caused a public uproar. This time they might be able to pull it off, though.

    --
    The owls are not what they seem
  22. That is rather "fascistic"... by AtariAmarok · · Score: 2, Interesting
    "You can write in whateven language you want, as long as you also have a French version! Speak the language ... French!"

    So, they still have the language-nazi problem? For all of the US problems with the Spanish language, I have yet to see a proposal as extreme as having the government punishing individuals for writing in the "wrong" language. Not even Pat Buchanan.

    "Speak the language ... French!"

    Why not let them speak what they want? There is no good reason at all that the "French language protection" needs to go beyond making sure French is used in government operations (inciuding government road signs). It really crosses the line to censor private individuals.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  23. Re: Weather The NDP is in power or not... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    So anyone who gets 25 or more signitures for there area must take their copy of the petition to their MP, weather their in "power" or not!

    Actually, MPs can introduce petitions with signatures from anywhere in Canada as long as they have a bunch from their own riding. Peter Julian was chosen for the first batch because many of the signatures were in his area, and the petition organizers were able to convince him to support the cause. His being an NDP member isn't particularly relevant. This is an issue that cuts across party lines - you could just as well say that the Right should support the petition because expanded copyright laws are government-sponsored monopolies and harm the free market.

    Please DO talk to your local MP about this, but it would be better to send your collected petition signatures to Digital Copyright Canada rather than sending them to your local MP, because the petition organizers are trying to collect them into well-organized batches, remove duplicates, and have them presented by the MPs who will bring us the greatest benefit. Submitting a petition to Parliament is a bit complicated if you want to do it in the proper way that compels them to pay official attention.

  24. Re:Get the facts straight. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Downloading commercial music without payment is not.

    Actually, if by "downloading" you mean making a personal copy of someone else's commercial music, then you're wrong.

    The Canadian Copyright Act specifically allows personal copies of music to be made. The U.S.A. has never had an equivalent exclusion in its copyright laws.

  25. Re:The NDP isn't in power. by peg0cjs · · Score: 2, Informative

    Only failed confidence votes bring down the government (e.g. the budget). Free votes fail all the time, it just means that the piece of legislation dies.

    --
    Karma: Excellent (Mainly due to Bill & Ted's Karma Adventure)
  26. Re:Get the facts straight. by tricops · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here's actual information related to its current legality in Canada... right here. It is currently legal to download personal copies. Whether that status will change, who knows...

    --
    (\(\
    (^v^)
    (")")
    This is the cute vorpal bunny virus, copy to your sig or runaway, runaway in fear!
  27. Good to see this by iminplaya · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This isn't just a Web click-through petition that politicians can freely ignore; more than a thousand real hardcopy signatures have already been collected from Canadian residents opposed to further expansion of copyright privileges... Emphasis mine

    I'm very happy to see that somebody actually sees copyright for what it really is...A privilege...granted to you by the public, subject to revocation at every election. Let's not forget that, eh?

    --
    What?
  28. The world is becoming like the one in Aliens by doc+modulo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "I'm Burke, I work for the company"

    The quote might not be accurate but the power of corporations keep growing lately. Especially in the US where the laws keeping corporations in check are too weak.

    A lot of conflicts where people died were partly because of corporations. Corporations get too powerful, violence has to happen to get the situation back to normal/livable. Happened in history lots of times. Mussolini said something like: "Fascism can be more accurately called corporatism"

    It's happening right now as well, there was this piece in Michael Moore's "Fahrenheit 911" where the population in a South-American country/province rebelled against a corporation and it's corrupt helpers. They were forbidden to collect and use rainwater from their own roofs because the water company wanted to sell more water at starvation prices.

    I hope we can fight off software patents in Europe, I hope Canada can fight off this law. Better to do it now peacefully than having to do it violently later. Might already be too late for the US. Incredible how the doofuses there vote their enemies into government.

    The most important thing is to keep thinking logically and optimistically. Keep an image of what you want in your head and things will work out. For example, think: "it's not too late for the US, things WILL work out better if we can just convince people of the truth, the brainwashed can not be convinced should be labeled not sane" etc.

    --
    - -- Truth addict for life.
  29. Re:Morality in Government. by UlfGabe · · Score: 2, Informative

    sorry i saw those same numbers as congress, i call bullshit, so show your cards.

    --
    Check journal for info on Anti-TextBook, an idea by me.
  30. Let them pass their meaningless laws... by LordZardoz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They can pass all the laws they want about copyrights for digital media. They will be largely inneffective as a deterrent.

    Until someone breaking such a law shows up in court, this will all mean nothing anyway. I would prefer the petition succeeds, but sooner or later, the entire damn thing will come crashing down simply because the law that the petition is against is essentially unenforcible anyway.

    Trying to pass laws preventing computers from copying information and using the internet from sharing that information is like trying to pass a law saying you can buy scissors, but cannot use scissors to cut things.

    It makes no sense to pass a law preventing you from using an item that you are permitted to own in a manner it is designed to be used.

    END COMMUNICATION

  31. Re:Morality in Government. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
    Check out Snopes

    The parent is full of BS. It shouldn't be modded up.

  32. FREE WILL by shufler · · Score: 2, Insightful
    >> Part of freedom is being free to choose
    >All of freedom is being free to choose. That's it.

    In the words of Geddy Lee (a Canadian, so this post is certainly ON TOPIC):

    You can choose a ready guide in some celestial voice.
    If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice.
    You can choose from phantom fears and kindness that can kill;
    I will choose a path that's clear
    I will choose freewill.
  33. Re:Not about copyright at all by neiras · · Score: 2, Insightful
    We don't hate Americans. Far from it. We hate bigoted, ultra-nationalist, Fox-News-Is-Fair-And-Balanced, With-Us-Or-Against-Us, Social-Programs-Are-For-Commies, Canada-Doesn't-Matter-Because-They-Don't-Do-What-W e-Say embarrassments to humanity like yourself.

    Real, upstanding, proud citizens of the USA who carry themselves with humility, share their many gifts with their neighbours, and accept our many differences with grace are much loved here. I mean, we're family, right? I wouldn't discard my brother because he doesn't agree with me. In most places I've visited in the States, the people are great.

    Yes, you're powerful. Yes, you could roll up here one night and take us out. But you aren't our judge, just as we aren't yours. When you speak about your neighbours in the future, do so with the respect most of us would still give you.

    ==

    How America looks from up here