Slashdot Mirror


Homemade EVDO/WiFi Mobile Access Point

Tamundson writes "Over the last few weeks I've built myself a mobile access point for my car. It's based on a Soekris net2421 embedded Linux box and uses Verizon's 1xRTT/EVDO network as its uplink, resharing it over 802.11b. Wherever my car goes, my Internet link goes! :) I finally put some webpages together on how I built it. The components are pretty cheap and anybody with basic Linux skills can build their own just as easily. I've also got it interfacing with Google Maps to do live vehicle tracking via gpsd. It also uploads pictures from an on-board webcam every five minutes or so."

172 comments

  1. Two, now four wheels by fembots · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Interesting, from two wheels to four wheels.

    JIC, coral links for website and GoogleMap image

  2. stop moving! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    How can I use your access point if you keep driving around?

    1. Re:stop moving! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He just has to share his coordinates and motion vectors.

    2. Re:stop moving! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'll have to hitchhike.
      Just don't forget to bring your towel.

    3. Re:stop moving! by rastakid · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, no. Continue moving! This is what wardriving really is!

      Now we can hold competitions: one AP driving around, several contestants trying to break into a machine in that car while they have to be in a certain proximity to have a connection to it. Sweet!

    4. Re:stop moving! by Cat_Byte · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Speaking of...I wanted to do something similar in my camper trailer for vacations or heading to the races. It would be nice to implement this along with some way to make my linux box auto scan and attach to the best non-encrypted signal. Can you do this on linux? I haven't found a way yet. It would be nice to just keep driving around the camp ground until I get a ping response ;)

      --
      Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one the bus load of girls just went down.
    5. Re:stop moving! by __aafutm5472 · · Score: 1

      Actually, at DefCon they do this. It's called the 'Running Man' (check out this story: Click!). It looks pretty cool...

    6. Re:stop moving! by sckeener · · Score: 1

      This is not the autoduel I was envisioning when I played the role playing game.

      Lets see for the crew, we'll need a driver, a navigator, and backseat hacker.

      Then we also have a weight problem. Normally people who drive cars weigh less than the average hacker.

      --
      "Only one thing, is impossible for god: to find any sense in any copyright law on the planet." Mark Twain
    7. Re:stop moving! by 3TimeLoser · · Score: 1

      My car is a Ford GT-40 (wishfull thinking). Good luck getting and staying within range of that beast.

    8. Re:stop moving! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      autoduel!!
      now that takes me back. watching mad max and playing autoduel... thank you for triggering that happy childhood memory.

    9. Re:stop moving! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      autoduel motto: "drive offensively".

      brilliant.

    10. Re:stop moving! by evdo-hsdpa-bob · · Score: 1

      funny!... just put a gps system on his car! but in all seriousness... you two could be xboxing each other in real time if you had a DUAL Bonded EVDO HSDPA to WIFI router... it'd gecha 3000k and 80ms. thats enough to do realtime video chatting while driving! Its at wireless internet dual evdo hsdpa laptop and wireless internet dual evdo hsdpa router

  3. Expensive by Nadsat · · Score: 3, Funny

    Cost ranging from $600 to 1400+ That's not including the cost of regular oil changes.

    1. Re:Expensive by Southpaw018 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, dude, but that setup is freakin cool.

      --
      ACs are modded -6. I don't read you, I don't mod you, I don't see you. Don't like it? Don't be a coward.
    2. Re:Expensive by VolcomPimp · · Score: 1

      Ummm no, it runs off your minutes but obviously this guys not stupid enough to waste all his cell minutes like this... but the unlimited plan is like $80 a month.

  4. Why is it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    That we have invented a million different ways to distract ourselves while blasting down the highway, without developing self-driving cars?

    1. Re:Why is it... by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Why is it... That we have invented a million different ways to distract ourselves while blasting down the highway, without developing self-driving cars?

      Building self-driving cars is a Very Hard Problem. It's being worked on, and great progress has been made, but it's not going to be ready for prime time yet.

      The problem is that it has to work safely even under strange or pathological circumstances. Guaranteeing this is much, much harder than getting a car to drive on an empty road and stop at well-marked intersections.

      On the plus side, as soon as a car autopilot drives better than the average driver, the insurance rate perk for getting one will make the switchover very rapid.

      As for distraction, you'll note from the article that the access point was never used by the person driving the vehicle (and that it's in fact illegal to do so in California). It's a passenger perk (and great for when you get _out_ of the car, with the range it has).

    2. Re:Why is it... by the+pickle · · Score: 1

      Because it's a million times easier to invent new distractions than it is to make a car that drives itself over our horribly irregular (from a machine standpoint) network of roads.

      Even having a car that drives itself on four-lane divided highways is beyond the reach of reasonable current technology. Don't even think about doing it in city traffic!

      Sad, I know, but it's not as though no one's tried.

      p

    3. Re:Why is it... by Daengbo · · Score: 1

      Are you knidding? My laptop won't even hibernate properly, and you want my to let it drive? Crawl before you walk, man...;)

    4. Re:Why is it... by pixel.jonah · · Score: 4, Interesting
      I witnessed the first DARPA Grand Challenge. Very eye opening to say the least. The first place entry cost over $1 million to build and went less than 8 miles. One of the close runners-up that went almost as far was built by two guys for around $40k.

      Simple things were serious issues like - if you're going slowly and your wheel comes up against a rock and at the current amount of throttle, it can't get over, what do you do - how do you know to just give it a little more gas and drive right over vs. you're up against something a little bigger that you should back up and drive around.

    5. Re:Why is it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem is that it has to work safely even under strange or pathological circumstances.

      It's true that it's difficult to build a safe self-driving car, but "safe" is a relative term. Nowadays, all your self-driving automaton has to be is safer than all the oblivious mouth-breathing morons yapping on their cell phones and watching DVDs while they should be driving. The task is far easier than it was 15 years ago for that reason alone.

    6. Re:Why is it... by Josh+Triplett · · Score: 1
      Why is it... That we have invented a million different ways to distract ourselves while blasting down the highway, without developing self-driving cars?

      Building self-driving cars is a Very Hard Problem. It's being worked on, and great progress has been made, but it's not going to be ready for prime time yet.

      The other major problem in building self-driving cars is that unless everyone is using them, a self-driving car has to be able to share the road with human drivers, not just other self-driving cars (which are much easier to get information from). Many of the demonstrations of groups of self-driving cars used communication between cars, or at the very least made assumptions about the ways those other cars would drive. A real self-driving system could not make such assumptions. Furthermore, even if all cars become self-driving, it isn't necessarily a good idea to trust the information provided by every other car on the road.
    7. Re:Why is it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't have any friends, do you?

    8. Re:Why is it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      as soon as a car autopilot drives better than the average driver

      which is not that hard. hell tying the wheel to point straight and setting the cruise control at the speedlimit does better than the average driver.

    9. Re:Why is it... by emotionus · · Score: 1

      user intervention?

    10. Re:Why is it... by NardofDoom · · Score: 1

      We have self driving cars. They're called trains and busses. But for some reason no one wants to use them.

      --
      You have two hands and one brain, so always code twice as much as you think!
    11. Re:Why is it... by Cat_Byte · · Score: 1
      Even having a car that drives itself on four-lane divided highways is beyond the reach of reasonable current technology.

      Not to mention in open desert for that automated robot car competition they just had. None of them made it to the target distance.

      --
      Two roads diverged in a wood, and I - I took the one the bus load of girls just went down.
    12. Re:Why is it... by IAmTheDave · · Score: 1

      Funny?! Mod parent insightful! Self-driving cars would mean a nice little 45 minute nap at 7:30 am and at 5:00 pm every day. Now that's living.

      --
      Excuse my speling.
      Making The Bar Project
    13. Re:Why is it... by bluGill · · Score: 1

      No, we want to use them, we just don't want to pay the cost to make them work.

      If it was one block from my door to the train, one or two switches total to work, and didn't take forever (ie. 3 hours to go as far as a car in 30 minutes) to make the trip I would take the train. However there is no way people on my income (and I make above average) could afford the ticket prices to have that level of convince. So only large cities where the population density allows sharing the costs between more people than are in my neighborhood have trains.

    14. Re:Why is it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed. I've heard the argument that "airplanes can do it in 3-d, shouldn't it be even easier in 2-d?" The fact is that there are no obstacles to hit, the terrain around airports is very well known, and the airplanes are relatively few, and are spaced many miles apart. The navigation during most of the flight can be up to two miles off (horizontally) and still be considered fine.

      Even when things get congested, there's often more than a minute of spacing between aircraft. As it is now, most drivers barely leave two seconds between cars. Add in the need to merge, read temporary traffic markings and signals (detours, lane shifts, emergency activity), road debris and pedestrians, and you very quickly end up with a "very hard problem".

    15. Re:Why is it... by Jondaley · · Score: 1

      NavLab does an alright job...

    16. Re:Why is it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Building self-driving cars is a Very Hard Problem.
      Why bother with cars, roads, traffic lights, stop signs, or flying cars? Setup a solar-powered subterranean packet switched pneumatic rail network of minimum size driven by traffic algorithms instead of every distracted idiot with coffee and a cell phone to them self. Run freight, mail, and people through it. Organized infrastructure allows for massive productivity, whereas a for-profit distributed infrastructure like the USA has now is oriented for profit. Gasoline, windshield wipers, oil changes, new tires, new mufflers, gaskets, drivers licenses, trucking companies, airbags... all made for something in the 20's! It's 85 years past that time: move on to organized, centralize infrastructure with free access and no fees or privatization. You vicious "I want my car" bastards keep this crap up and we will have Flying Cars crashing on our homes! Why not build something that takes hundreds of things "out of line" to cause fatality, instead of one person "out of line" tinkering with the latest device to incorporate 1000 functions via access of 3 buttons to cause fatality. Humans can make things land on Mars and analyze minerals, but they do not cyclically invest in infrastructure for their own development! rtx.

    17. Re:Why is it... by SillySnake · · Score: 1
      I remember the DOT sponsered some research into this.. They ended up building a car and driving it from the east coast to the west coast..


      If I remember correctly the car drove over 90% of the trip.. I couldn't find a web page about the research, but I'm sure it took place.

    18. Re:Why is it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not a very hard problem. Driving on controlled-access roads with good paint is actually pretty easy. It's been done before, on a fairly small budget, without even re-designing the vehicle or its control systems.

      The only reason we don't have self-driving cars is fear. We're afraid to let cars drive themselves and mfgs. are afraid of the liability issues of making self-driving cars.

    19. Re:Why is it... by pixel.jonah · · Score: 1

      It was 100% hands-off - they even had monitoring to detect attempted wireless control!

    20. Re:Why is it... by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 1

      It's not a very hard problem. Driving on controlled-access roads with good paint is actually pretty easy.

      Meanwhile, in the real world, you're driving on poorly-maintained roads with bad signage, sub-optimal weather conditions, and lots and lots of other drivers doing unpredictable and quite often illegal things.

      Driving on a well-marked road under good conditions is a toy problem by comparison. IAACompEng, and a regular driver.

    21. Re:Why is it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The first 90% is always the easiest. It's the one or two pathological cirtumstances in every road trip that can a) kill you, and b) it needs to deal with.

  5. Finally!!! by zoloback · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now I'll be able to find the nearest starbucks no matter where I am.
    Beats the method of calling my friends every half an hour when i'm on a trip and trying to describe the surrounding cities/streets/lamp posts in hope for some guidance to a hot cup of coffee.

    --Beware of on the road browsing though

    --
    The future will take care of itself.. It has in the past
    1. Re:Finally!!! by artifex2004 · · Score: 1
      Now I'll be able to find the nearest starbucks no matter where I am.
      Beats the method of calling my friends every half an hour when i'm on a trip and trying to describe the surrounding cities/streets/lamp posts in hope for some guidance to a hot cup of coffee.

      You should be going here. The guy's visited 4535 so far, or about 90% of the corporate Starbucks in the country. And others, abroad. If you haven't got a wireless setup for your travel, yet, you can visit the states beforehand and print/save pictures of the stores.
    2. Re:Finally!!! by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      Sheesh. I just throw a rock in any direction and it hits a Starbucks.

      Must be a "Living in the City" thing.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  6. Slashdotted ... or? by Piranhaa · · Score: 1, Funny

    I wonder if this guy is running his webserver in his car; it's really slow.... or it could be that he got slashdotted! sucker

    1. Re:Slashdotted ... or? by Zenophran · · Score: 5, Funny

      Heh, no officer, my I didn't crash, I was slashdotted...

    2. Re:Slashdotted ... or? by houghi · · Score: 1

      It is mainly the pictures that are slow and they are behind a php script. So I asume the PHP script or the database is slow. Just try http://images.fbrtech.com/view_photo.php?set_album Name=EVDOrouter&id=soekris

      --
      Don't fight for your country, if your country does not fight for you.
    3. Re:Slashdotted ... or? by Tugrik · · Score: 1

      Yeah... I'd meant to mirror the images server to a high-bandwidth location but hadn't gotten around to it yet. My bad. The actual project pages are on a good provider with lots of bandwidth to spare. My bad...

      *starts sloooooowly copying images over*

  7. Seems like a good prototype. by Future+Man+3000 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Get the cost down, and this would be an interesting way to integrate per-vehicle information (speed and congestion [via vehicle proximities/GPS]) with map information to get realtime data on the best route to work. Or figure out where the most interesting accidents are happening.

    --

    I never vote for anyone. I always vote against.
    -- W.C. Fields

    1. Re:Seems like a good prototype. by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Get the cost down, and this would be an interesting way to integrate per-vehicle information (speed and congestion [via vehicle proximities/GPS]) with map information to get realtime data on the best route to work.

      I'm not sure how he'd get the cost down much further than it is already. He's using off the shelf parts at commodity prices. Building in quantity-100 might shave off 30% or so, but even fabbing your own integrated board with all widgets on it in quantity-1000 would only get to about half the current price.

      Custom IC would get it down further, but that would take quantity-silly :).

    2. Re:Seems like a good prototype. by Jonboy+X · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      All the taxes paid over a lifetime by the average American are spent by the government in less than a second.
      -JF


      I call shenannigans on that one. Ya figure, people nowadays are living 2 or 3 billion seconds (60 to 100 years). If each of the ~275 million Americans alive today only paid for 1 of the seconds of your life, you'd have to die by age 10 for the math to work out.

      Then again, maybe the US gov't really *is* spending money 10 times as fast as it's coming in...time to cash out my bonds!

      --

      "In a 32-bit world, you're a 2-bit user. You've got your own newsgroup, alt.total.loser." -Weird Al
    3. Re:Seems like a good prototype. by shawb · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Actually, it could make sense. Start by assuming that all taxes collected are income taxes:

      Assume that the average American starts working at 16 and retires at 55. This leaves 39 years of working. We can round up to 40 years of working years.

      with an average of 40 hours wourked out of every 168 hours in a week, slightly less than 1 in 4 hours is spent working while employed.

      Therefore the average person works for less than ten years of their life, which comes close to the number for how long you said a person would live.

      Or to put it a different way: if one were to spend all of their working time meeting new people, they'd only get a second with each person if they were to meet everyone in the US. This doesn't even include the fact that there is a turnover in those that are employeed during the time that you work.

      It is just by a fluke of population size that it works out to about one second. Whether or not the taxes paid out are in the form of income tax, sales tax or property tax really shouldn't matter, as in general a person will pay all of these taxes combined in a manner relative to the amount of money that they make. While there will be some outliers that end up with a much different distribution of tax structure, we're talking about the average person here.

      To sum up a career in number of seconds: 60seconds/minute * 60minutes/hour * (40hours/workweek) * 52weeks/year * 40 years/career= 60*60*40*52*40 = 299,520,000 workseconds/career. This is really dang close to the current population of about 295 million people in the united states.

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
    4. Re:Seems like a good prototype. by Agret · · Score: 1

      My dad borrowed a device that tells you your vehicle speed and routes off GPS & built-in maps. It requires no connection to your car to function. Just charge the battery and dump it on your dashboard and it will read aloud the turns to your destination.

      --
      Have you metaroderated recently?
    5. Re:Seems like a good prototype. by Jonboy+X · · Score: 1

      Nope, sorry. You're assuming that the government only spends money while you personally are working, which is an obviously false assumption. I don't know about you, but the last time *I* was out of work, the national debt continued to grow unabated.

      --

      "In a 32-bit world, you're a 2-bit user. You've got your own newsgroup, alt.total.loser." -Weird Al
    6. Re:Seems like a good prototype. by CharlieHedlin · · Score: 1

      But keep in minde that 80% of the taxes are paid by the top 20% of the poputlation, not average americans.

      I think the math could come close to working.

    7. Re:Seems like a good prototype. by bluGill · · Score: 1

      Don't forget that much of that is optional features. A trucking company doesn't need the WiFi card, or the webcam. They just want a display (controlled remotely) to tell the driver where his next stop is, perhaps with a few acknowledgment buttons.

    8. Re:Seems like a good prototype. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering that the wealthiest 10% of the population makes more than 90% of the money (and this gap is growing) that disparity seems to be lower than it should be.

    9. Re:Seems like a good prototype. by shawb · · Score: 1

      Yes, I did simplify things. However the deficit is less than 10% of the federal budget. A value of about half the current deficit is in interest payments on the debt, the vast majority of which is to US citizens and corporations in the form of interest payments on government bonds, so this money comes back to the US.

      That 10% won't really change the fact that your calling of shenannigans was unjustified. I just showed it isn't that "you'd have to die by age 10 for the math to work out" so much as a person would have to work for 10 years worth of seconds in their life to make the 1 second/person analogy work out, simply because of a coincidence of current population size.

      And the government does still spend while individuals were out of work, however that just means that you get taxed a little higher when you are working, as though you worked the 299,520,000 second career that I quoted. Maybe you won't retire at 56 like my estimate assumed. Maybe you work more than 40 hours a week. Maybe your wife will be a homemaker and not be paid a taxable wage or salary for the rest of her life. But this works out because the whole thing is based on averages anyways. And it doesn't even matter how the taxes are split up: social security, Fed, State, sales tax, property tax, payments on fines, etc etc etc, because what goes into the government comes out, within the 10% margin of debt that we currently have. And I don't think that the 10% of a second will make that much difference.

      I was just admiring that it was pretty neat that the math worked out this close. In China, you wouldn't have to pull the career thing, wince the 2-3 billion life expectancy that you quoted WOULD be 1 second per person. Except then you would have to work every single second that you are alive.

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
  8. Where do you get Verizon Broadban d by iMaple · · Score: 1

    I dont get Verizon Broadband in Austin (and I always thought that Austin was one of the most wired ... ahem ..wireless cites ). Anyway the live vehicle tracking is a good idea. If they enforced some vehicle tracking mechanism in every new car sold in overcrowded cities, wont that help the people/authorities detect and circumvent jams (and it will probably be a fraction of the cost of the wasted gas)

    1. Re:Where do you get Verizon Broadban d by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

      because of course a tracking system would never be used for evil purposes, the government would never start mining data for "suspicious" behavior under the shroud of Terrorism.

      --
      Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    2. Re:Where do you get Verizon Broadban d by Politburo · · Score: 1

      wont that help the people/authorities detect and circumvent jams

      The problem isn't detecting traffic jams. They usually occur in the same places. The problem is that in most places, there is no way to circumvent the traffic jam. In the NYC metro area, most of the area highways are saturated during the peak-period, even without any anomalous events. If one road is diverted, where are the cars going to go? Local roads cannot handle the amount of traffic a highway can handle. Other highways are already saturated, so if people detour there, it ends up just slowing down that road as well.

  9. Slashdot effect in acction by ahziem · · Score: 1, Funny

    At the bottom of the page is a counter. It went up from about 1100 to 1200 in a few seconds. Click refresh and watch it jump!

    1. Re:Slashdot effect in acction by Karl+Tacheron · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I'm sure that people unnecessarily refreshing the page is just what he needs at the moment.

    2. Re:Slashdot effect in acction by rastakid · · Score: 2, Funny

      At the bottom of the page is a counter. It went up from about 1100 to 1200 in a few seconds. Click refresh and watch it jump!

      Yeah, that will help him. All Slashdotters double the effect, NOW!

    3. Re:Slashdot effect in acction by zkn · · Score: 1

      I could be that it's just you and 9 other guys reloading constantly to see how the counter jumps.

  10. No such thing as a net2421 by Cainam · · Score: 2, Informative

    According to the article, the embedded platform used was actually a Soekris net4521. There's no such board as the net2421.

    1. Re:No such thing as a net2421 by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 1

      According to the article, the embedded platform used was actually a Soekris net4521. There's no such board as the net2421.

      Given that the person who wrote the submission is the person who wrote the project page, I think we can file this in the "accidental typo" category".

    2. Re:No such thing as a net2421 by Tugrik · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yup. :) That's what I get for submitting a /. story in a rush...

      At least I got it right on the project pages!

  11. It'll crawl! by SeiRyu · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The service companies like verizon/sprint offer using the 3G network achieves much of it's supposed '70k-100k' down speed from compression it applies on the images. (downgrades the quality of jpg, etc)
    The real speed is barely comparable to 56k modem (if the use is light on the provider's network) and this is given you have a perfect signal reception. All this is with a SINGLE computer on the network. Now if this were used amongst 2.. or more computers you'd barely be able to browse the web, much less connect to your favorite Linux box via SSH.

    1. Re:It'll crawl! by menn0nite · · Score: 2, Informative

      Umm... evdo is 2.4mbps tops, 300-500k PROMISED. Since I've been using it I've averaged 800k down, 160k up. I've had no problem with ssh, (and vnc as well as terminal services )

    2. Re:It'll crawl! by Tugrik · · Score: 5, Informative

      For speed testing I used Broadband Reports's site.

      In 1xRTT-land I got 70up/30dn most of the time. About 1/4 of the time I'd get 110up/50dn. At the worst (only a few times, and usually when the evening commute hours put a lot of traffic near where I was parked) I'd get about 50/10. Compared to a 56k modem (about 26/20 on the same tool when I tried it), this isn't bad.

      I've had 4 computers using it at the same time. While it will start to gronk on images with multiple access it's truly not that bad. And no, we're not using any kind of proxy, cache or compressor.

      I've yet to get this system out under EVDO coverage yet, save for the single test that got me 600dn (found one local tower where it was activated. Didn't last. Hrmf). When EVDO hits my area (or I take a trip into an EVDO area) I'll put up better metrics.

      Compared to GPRS (my old wireless link) it's much nicer.

    3. Re:It'll crawl! by Daniel+Wood · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not really. I used a Sprint phone as my primary form of net access for nearly a year. While it does compress images(REALLY high compression at that), you can still pull 140kbits continuously. I used to run Kazaa downloading mp3s all the time and I used DUMeter to track my speeds. Consistent 140kbits, except on the weekends, then it was like 14kbits, especially on Sundays. Average reception where I was at was 2-3bars.

    4. Re:It'll crawl! by manitoulinnerd · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Oh how broadband has spoiled you.

      Once upon a time, before I left home, I had dialup internet. Unfortunatly my ISP was some government funded one so equipment upgrades were not really their thing.

      We had a 32Kb/s internet connection. I say we because by brother and I shared this dialup connection over our home network. Now yes it was not speedy but with a good IM to keep you company it was quite useable. Image intensive pages took a little to load but we survived.

      Updateing windows and downloading linux ISOs were a problem though. ;)

      My point is that for his uses it is good enough. I am sure he is open to suggestions to speed it up though.

      --
      Burn Bright or Fade Away
    5. Re:It'll crawl! by eno2001 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Whine, whine, whine. In my day, we had to go up the hill to the bit well and carry the bits back to the PC with the bit bucket! And we liked it!! You kids today with your broadband, and your big pants, and your Ministry of Sound! ;P

      --
      -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
    6. Re:It'll crawl! by greg1104 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I've been using the same Verizon broadband service as is described in the article for about six months now. When connecting to their EVDO network, I get a consistant raw rate of 500Kb/s on downloads and around 100Kb/s up. This is in the suburbs about 15 miles from the center of the coverage area I live near (Baltimore). While I don't have any firm numbers, the network seems even faster when I'm nearer to the center of their area, like when in NYC.

      Note that I saw raw rate here because I'm not using the compression package Verizon provided. While it seemed to slightly improve performance when browsing the web, I found that something it was messing with made SSH sessions much less reliable. I turned it off the first day and haven't missed it.

      While there are occasional hiccups that cause me to lose the connection (which are no more frequent than when I'm connected with 802.11b; screen is your friend here), I can assure you that when in the EVDO sections the SSH sessions I launch every day work perfectly even if I have two or three computers sharing the network connection via NAT.

    7. Re:It'll crawl! by BrookHarty · · Score: 1

      I have a UMTS A845, and I get over 200K on Cingular (Former ATTWS), Problem, UMTS is already being phased out for HSPDA for upto 10Mbs (4Mbs real world).

      Lucky HSPDA is just a upgrade to UMTS, you get devices that are backwards compatible, so don't expect more UMTS devices in the USA, all new devices are going to be HSPDA or GPRS.

      http://reviews-zdnet.com.com/4520-3504_16-566493 3- 4.html

    8. Re:It'll crawl! by Unique2 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Gronk

      Why not invest in a dictionary you fscking idiot.

      --
      No trees were harmed in the posting of this message. However, a great number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
    9. Re:It'll crawl! by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      *The real speed is barely comparable to 56k modem (if the use is light on the provider's network) and this is given you have a perfect signal reception. All this is with a SINGLE computer on the network. Now if this were used amongst 2.. or more computers you'd barely be able to browse the web, much less connect to your favorite Linux box via SSH.*

      I'd mod you seriously misinformed, if I had mod points and there were such a mod.

      gprs is barely 56k modem. evdo is not gprs, not even nearly.

      the real problem with most 3g networks is not the speed, the speed is good - but the billing. when you would get a bill of 300$ per hour when going full swing with the connection... well, you tend to not to use it at those prices.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    10. Re:It'll crawl! by artifex2004 · · Score: 1

      How'd you decide which cell card to get? Or was it the only one available when you first got service? Do you think the different cards're noticeably different, performance wise, with 1xRTT, and do you think it will be more obvious with EVDO?

      I wanna rush out and start buying parts, but I'd like to know your reasoning for that choice in particular :) Also, I guess, why you went with Verizon, and not Cingular or Sprint. I do see Verizon claims to have the full broadband access here in Dallas, which I guess means EVDO.

    11. Re:It'll crawl! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SPRINT was good when they first rolled it out.
      128kbps radio would stream to the car, no peoblem.

      Then they purposefully throttled to 70kbps.
      Then they installed a brain dead cache-compression box that would completely download any page or image, compressing the image, even after the browser disconnected. I could go to my web site, click on a couple of dozen large images in rapid succession and the crisco-cache they were using would be on it's knees for 20 minutes.

      My point is that the stuff works if the provider builds out their network to support the users.

      SPRINT worked fine in rural areas but in metro where I lived at the time it was CRAP.

      Friend has verizon which is 3X SPRINT's bandwidth and guess what. In metro during rush hour or first hour of 'free' evening calls, it's PURE CRAP. The network is saturated!

      Point?
      If you live in a rural area with the service, it's a bargain at $100/mo for all you can eat. Especially if there is no cable or DSL alternative. But, in the city, it's a waste of time and effort.

    12. Re:It'll crawl! by EVDOguy · · Score: 1

      You are benchmarking 1xRTT (40k - 90k) and comparing it to EVDO (500k - 700k). Of course, 1xRTT will be slightly faster than dial-u and more comparable to other slower technologies. If you are in an EVDO area (this is the key), EVDO ROCKS! Here is a page the discusses the differences: http://www.evdoinfo.com/Tips/PC_5220/Help%2C_EVDO_ is_SLOW%2C_or_what_is_1xRTT_and_EVDO_2005030992/

    13. Re:It'll crawl! by aidoneus · · Score: 1

      You had a bucket?! Spoiled brat... back in my day, we didn't even have that. We had to spend days stalking elusive bits on the savannah and when we finally did catch one we had to carry each one back to the cave individually before some freeloading camper came along and took are hard-earned bits.

    14. Re:It'll crawl! by speleo · · Score: 1

      Damn, and I've been using the Verizon PC5220 for about six month now on my Mac and have been very happy with it. Little did I know it didn't work well. Oh, well.

      Seriously, it's not bad. There's a lot of latency on the network (ping times of 500 - 800 ms) so it's not ideal for ssh sessions, but I do it all the time anyway.

      It's quite a bit faster than a 56k modem. And I find it works well even with a weak signal. And while Verizon may suck in many ways, they do have good network coverage.

    15. Re:It'll crawl! by Tugrik · · Score: 1

      I chose the 5220 for two reasons. (1) there's aa Verizon store down the street that had one in stock at the moment I chose to do this. Impulse buys rock.

      (2) It's macintosh compatible. I wanted a card that, if this project failed, I could simply put in my mac and have work. :)

      If I did it again I'd use the new V620 card. Better internal antenna, slightly better power management, and it's controllable in the same way as the 5220 (will work with 5220 drivers in both the stompbox and on the mac with only a little tweaking).

    16. Re:It'll crawl! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      It's a legitimate strategy!

  12. Even better... by netcrusher88 · · Score: 1

    Maybe someone could come up with some sort of sattelite WiFi uplink thingamajig... Somehow, I doubt EVDO has as good coverage as XM's sattelites. Very cool idea though.

    --
    There's an old saying that says pretty much whatever you want it to.
    1. Re:Even better... by Tugrik · · Score: 1

      This can be adapted to about any uplink you want, either via PCMCIA, mini-pci, serial or ethernet. Making it run off of a Direcway satellite or similar is just a matter of purchasing the uplink equipment, no worries.

      EVDO's coverage isn't great. The slower version (1xRTT) is about the same as Verizon's voice service. Not *everywhere* but it's been in far more places than I thought it'd be. With a 3w booster and a good antenna (a trick the long-term RV crowd has known about for years for voice use) you can get data 10-30 miles from the nearest tower, geography permitting.

      The moment an affordable in-motion-antenna satellite system is available you better believe I'm modding the stompbox to do it. :)

  13. /. effect wearing the dragon out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Watch his little dragon at the bottom - hit refresh a few times to guage the effect.

  14. I can't even begin to tell you.... by Hyperkinetic · · Score: 2, Funny

    How tired I am of starting a project, and having someone beat me to it. (sigh)

    1. Re:I can't even begin to tell you.... by Tugrik · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Funny thing is that I'm exactly the same way. I've done dozens of little projects, sometimes right through completion, and by the time I put up some web page about it I find out it was last month's geek press.

      I know of about 5 others (two in my area) who are making similar devices... so I'm still surprised I was the first one to get pages about such a project on /. .

      How far have you gotten on yours, if you're working on the same kind of project? What else have you made yours do?

    2. Re:I can't even begin to tell you.... by EVDOguy · · Score: 1

      We posted something last month that was a 'technology preview', that was close to this. Glad it is working, very cool! http://www.evdoinfo.com/Tips/PC_5220/EVDO_GPS_WebC am_Mapping_20050323147/

    3. Re:I can't even begin to tell you.... by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      That's Ok.

      I'm taking notes for a project to make my entire city wireless.

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    4. Re:I can't even begin to tell you.... by cloudmaster · · Score: 1

      At least this guy's not making money off of it.

      Look at the Kenwood music keg, then look at the "About us" link on the orignal Musc Keg's web site (aka phatnoise.com) that mentions when they first started developing it. 1999. Then search rec.audio.car for my /. name and look at the posts asking about info to make such a device in late 1998 (my website's down due to an ISP failure, or I'd point at that, too).

      At least I only know of one place where someone actually beat me to market (I was gonna give my software away - those asses at phatnoise won't help anyone out, though they're sure benefitting from their Linux-based system), so the other things that are old news aren't quite as irritating.

  15. Re:Accidental Typo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Given that the person who wrote the submission is the person who wrote the project page, I think we can file this in the "accidental typo" category".

    or his bank pin number....

  16. Car theft. by ThetaPi · · Score: 1

    I think this would make his vehicle rather easy to steal. Easy to recover too, since he can tell the police where his car was five minutes ago.

    --
    "When God kisses Satan and the Incarnations applaud." "Death is dead. Long live Death!"
  17. rural no dsl/cable option... by menn0nite · · Score: 1

    If you can make a cheaper (larger is fine too and wifi isn't nessissary) version, you can probably sell it in area's currently too far out for dsl/cable (don't say "but there won't be any signal out there)

    1. Re:rural no dsl/cable option... by Tugrik · · Score: 3, Informative

      This is what folks like JunXion already do. It's really simple. Just remove the WiFi board, add a (surprisingly cheap) directional yagi antenna, a 3w 800/1900 booster and point at the nearest tower. Boom. House-data over ethernet. The device has two ethernet ports already built in. I use one for wired clients and the other as an alternate uplink if I don't use the EVDO card.

    2. Re:rural no dsl/cable option... by drelectro · · Score: 1

      No problem, the CDM-822seu will do the trick at about US$500, Available here:-

      http://www.land-cellular.com/products/index.htm
      or here:-
      http://www.call-direct.com.au/CDMA_modems.htm

      It's 1xRTT at the moment but EV-DO is comming Real Soon Now.

    3. Re:rural no dsl/cable option... by sw155kn1f3 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, removing WiFi board and adding directional yagi antenna (I see it now, if yagi antenna isn't redundant enough - you use directional yagi antenna), a 3w 800/1900 booster and point at the nearest tower is much easier... Thank you :-D

      --
      - Arwen, I'm your father, Agent Smith.
      - Well, you're just Smith, but my father is Aerosmith!
    4. Re:rural no dsl/cable option... by greenlead · · Score: 1

      Ah! Add a signal-strength controlled motor, and have the antenna automatically point at the strongest signal while driving! That would be sweet! :)

  18. The only problem by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 1
    If you want to be able to 'integrate per-vehicle information' and 'get realtime data on the best route to work', you're going to have to be able to track me.

    And that's just not happening.

    But google maps partially does this now, in selected cities.

    1. Re:The only problem by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 1

      If you want to be able to 'integrate per-vehicle information' and 'get realtime data on the best route to work', you're going to have to be able to track me.

      And that's just not happening.


      If one car in a hundred had a transponder, you'd get a good idea of how traffic was flowing on the major routes in and around a city. One in a thousand might even be enough for this.

      You might actually be able to do this just by looking for cell phone emissions from tracking towers. I'm sure at least that many people use their cell phones while commuting. This gives you better coverage than traffic cameras/helicopters.

    2. Re:The only problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The person might not even have to be using their cell phone, the phone just has to be in communication with the tower.

    3. Re:The only problem by biglig2 · · Score: 1

      Wave goodbye to your car then... I give the UK 10 years, tops, before they try to put a transponder in every car.

      It'll be for road charging - your road tax depends on how far you drive and where - but of course they'll use it for speeding tickets pretty soon afterwards, and the security services will have a back-door immediately, and then they'll let the police use it.

      Tinfoil hat time for biglig, you think? Did you know that Mayor Ken Livingstone has publicly stated that if he ever canceled the congestion charge scheme (you pay £5 a day to drive a car in central london) he would keep the cameras that run the system around for police use? That he also anticipates an upgrade to mandatory transponders in that time period?

      --
      ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
  19. And don't forget... by misleb · · Score: 4, Funny

    If this car's a rockin'... don't look at my webcam pictures uploaded every five minutes!

    -matthew

    --
    "THERE IS NO JUSTICE, THERE IS ONLY ME." -Death
    1. Re:And don't forget... by racazip · · Score: 1

      Maybe after 7 minutes.

  20. ...and back to 2-wheels again by Tugrik · · Score: 1

    What I didn't put in the project web pages before it got /.'d: I'm making a case with integrated battery that mounts on the back of my R1150GS motorcycle. If I get the size trimmed a bit it should fit without taking up any of the bike's luggage space. Now to figure out how to make a lean-angle sensor to record that along with the speed/position data... :)

    1. Re:...and back to 2-wheels again by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 2, Informative

      What I didn't put in the project web pages before it got /.'d: I'm making a case with integrated battery that mounts on the back of my R1150GS motorcycle. If I get the size trimmed a bit it should fit without taking up any of the bike's luggage space. Now to figure out how to make a lean-angle sensor to record that along with the speed/position data... :)

      You could use the dual-axis accelerometer I used for the robot project to sense tilt changes. Have it integrate changes to guess at current tilt, and recalibrate itself by assuming that anything maintained for 30 seconds or more is a tilt of zero. You could combine it with one of the pseudo-gyro sensors made by the same company (Analog Devices), but be warned that they're ball-grid array packages (and it's probably overkill for your purposes).

    2. Re:...and back to 2-wheels again by Tugrik · · Score: 1

      Yeah, BGA is a pain in the hindside to work with on the hobby level. I've got a surface-mount soldering station but it's still a pain (one of the Hakko units).

      Thanks for the parts pointer! *digs through Digikey*

    3. Re:...and back to 2-wheels again by Christopher+Thomas · · Score: 1

      I prefer the 14-SOIC version of the accelerometer, but it doesn't seem to be in stock at the moment. Have fun :).

  21. Bluetooth instead of wifi gets you real mobility by rufusdufus · · Score: 1

    My setup is a Sony u750p and with a bluetooth cf-card and a cellphone.
    Since its bluetooth, the cellphone stays in my pocket (unless it rings!) and the computer fits in my jacket pocket when not in use. This way I get broadband not just within range of my car, but anywhere I go.

  22. Why do you need a car? by mi · · Score: 3, Informative
    My bluetooth cellphone and laptop do this. The phone can "dial" Verizon's network. Not sure, what the bandwidth is supposed to be, but I saw downloads of 20 kilobytes per second.

    The laptop talks to the phone over the built-in bluetooth and can share the connection over the built-in WiFi card.

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:Why do you need a car? by rufusdufus · · Score: 1

      jinx!

    2. Re:Why do you need a car? by mrchaotica · · Score: 1

      RTFA. He wanted a router, not just an internet connection. He wants more than one computer to be able to use it at a time, without dealing with internet connection sharing.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

    3. Re:Why do you need a car? by mi · · Score: 1

      RMFP (my fancy post) -- it is only two paragraphs. My laptop is acting as a router -- it shares its "dial-up" connection over WiFi.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    4. Re:Why do you need a car? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Re:Why do you need a car?

      You must be not from the US. We use cars for everything here. Banking, getting fast food, talking on the phone, sex... So now you can do all of the above and browse slashdot at the same time :)

  23. Pictures fixed by Tugrik · · Score: 1

    I moved the pictures over to the high-bandwidth site. They should be much better behaved now. :)

  24. If the car crashes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Will he need to reboot?

    1. Re:If the car crashes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He made it clear that it ran Linux, not windows.

    2. Re:If the car crashes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that to say that the car won't crash, or that that the system won't need rebooting if it does?

  25. Also check out CLIVE by Tugrik · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Thanks for all the comments and email so far; I'm glad folks seem to like the project.

    While you're there, be sure to check out our other hardware hack from last year, stored on the same server: CLIVE. It's an Iridium Flare Tracker we built out of a Gameboy Advance and a DPSS laser.

    I've moved all the images from both projects to the same high-bandwidth server so they shouldn't stall out any more. Being slashdotted is rather fun to watch. :)

    1. Re:Also check out CLIVE by Linker3000 · · Score: 1

      We really need a TotalSlash section for people like you!

      Glad you're having fun!

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
    2. Re:Also check out CLIVE by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Added features?
      I noticed the board you used has some spare IO have you thought about adding a Dallas one wire network to it? You could all sorts of sensors and digital IO to the system. Maybe a mobile weather station?

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  26. Meshing cars by cibus · · Score: 1

    Hey, what a cool project! Gotta love comments like "There's so much support for Linux and BSD on this hardware that it's hard not to build one" :-) Now if enough people hooked up WLAN routers in their cars you could build a mesh network and Internet access could be provided by any available open static access point(s) so that you dont have to pay big $$$ for the mobile linkup.

  27. Or... use a laptop by bmidgley · · Score: 2, Informative

    We don't have EVDO in my area yet, but I do this all the time with my laptop and a 1xrtt connection. It connects through bluetooth to my v710 and I share the connection using an atheros wifi card.

    I was going to switch to an intel wifi card when the driver started improving, but they don't support master mode yet.

    Under debian, it's fairly easy using ipmasq. If I "ifup" the wireless adapter when there is already a default route (from the phone or ethernet), the wifi card is set up to take a static address with no default route of its own and fire up a dhcp server before it reruns ipmasq.

    I was running it today on the bus. A pal was using it for his network connection but he had to ride a lot farther than I did so he was sad when my stop came up.

    I wish I knew how to make the net sharing stealthy like OpenBSD does. Without any stealth, I think if verizon wanted to figure out who was sharing their connection, they could find out.

    1. Re:Or... use a laptop by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Under debian, it's fairly easy using ipmasq. If I "ifup" the wireless adapter when there is already a default route (from the phone or ethernet), the wifi card is set up to take a static address with no default route of its own and fire up a dhcp server before it reruns ipmasq.
      Neat; how'd you accomplish this? Personally, I would've probably used a mapping/script combo.
  28. Verizon offers this in Austin, I have it . . . by millisa · · Score: 1

    The original article had a link right to it . . .
    The 5220 card runs 200 bucks with a 100 buck discount and the service is 80 a month.

    I haven't found a dead spot in Austin yet and I know it is good as far down as San Marcos.

  29. Yeah but... by HerbieStone · · Score: 1
    ...does your cellphone run linux?

    ;)

  30. Great... but by fasuin · · Score: 1

    wasn't it simpler to put the Verizon's PCMCIA inside the laptop???

    1. Re:Great... but by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      Yes, but the point was to enable easy sharing for other users in the car. RTFA.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    2. Re:Great... but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that and the signal didn't work unless he wanted to park somewhere and get out.

      Good idea for webbrowsing but it would kill the whole real-time gps tracking/webcam and anything else that doesn't require the attention of the driver..

      (Can anyone say shoutcast radio anywhere?)

  31. This ain't yer bluetooth phone. by DingerX · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yeah, sure, you can get a bluetooth-enabled phone and run your laptop through that, but the point isn't simply to produce mobile wireless access. It's more about running a permanent network out of your automobile.

    We've had the technology and the ability to do this, but the really cool applications are just too risky, too liability-prone, or too legally questionable to catch the attention of the developers. So while your luxocar has a bluetooth network that catches viruses, and a lot of handy value-added features go by the wayside.
    I mean, here's the things that are useful for an in-car network:

    A) Porn. Porn drives technology, period. I strongly recommend that the next development in this field be a means to stream internet porn onto a heads-up (hands-free) display, possibly via voice command. Since we're all being open-sourcy about it, there should also be a facility to transmit and add to the global wealth of internet porn.
    B) Anti-theft. This is talked about in the article, although I find it difficult to imagine a thief wanting anything as ugly as a Honda Element. Maybe if he riced it up a bit, and camouflaged the solar panel as a big-ass aftermarket wing or something; that and one of those "battery life extender" stickers that says "R-Type" on it
    C) Navigation: again, there are already factory-installed and aftermarket solutions for this, but we really could use some improvements that only proper geeks can provide:
    1. The author mentions networking radar detectors, as well as other traffic indicators (speed, proximity). That's a good start.
    2. Much more interesting would be to network a whole slew of sensors. Radar detectors are good; but why not slap in a cheap scanner that runs through a whole range of frequencies and plots spikes and intensities? With a few sensors around, you could provide real-time plots of a large amount of radio traffic, and even localize quite a few. Heck, many police and fire frequencies are already out there on the internet.
    Of course, y'all would need some centralized support for that, and if done wrong, it'd probably be the target of some congressman's ire, and attempts to shut it down.
    Then again, if you ran something like a series of IRC channels (one for each region, run through port 80 and otherwise made to look like web traffic), authenticated users and blocklists, that just echoed reports from rmeote users, and maybe queries ("anyone got a picture of the tollbooth?"), you'd have your geek comms paradise, and the guy riding shotgun would have plenty of tasks to perform to isolate and avoid the mundane threats of traffic jams, separate ATIS noise from highway patrols, keep a steady stream of porn going to the driver's HU/HDD, and try to avoid throwing up.
    D) Don't forget the need to bridge with existing open WiFi access points. Starbucks offers their networks as a service to the community, after all.

    Then again, it's just a car. Speeding is generally something best done away from other cars. VoIP won't work too well with 3G latency. Any nerd project that gets mainstream acceptance loses most of its utility as people figure out ways to nickle and dime the life out of it.

    1. Re:This ain't yer bluetooth phone. by jcuervo · · Score: 1
      Then again, if you ran something like a series of IRC channels (one for each region, run through port 80 and otherwise made to look like web traffic), authenticated users and blocklists, that just echoed reports from rmeote users, and maybe queries ("anyone got a picture of the tollbooth?"), you'd have your geek comms paradise, and the guy riding shotgun would have plenty of tasks to perform to isolate and avoid the mundane threats of traffic jams, separate ATIS noise from highway patrols, keep a steady stream of porn going to the driver's HU/HDD, and try to avoid throwing up.
      Interesting: IRC is designed after HAM radio, develops for a while, then begins to operate over radio anyway.

      Anyway, suggest http+ssl instead of plain http.
      --
      Assume I was drunk when I posted this.
    2. Re:This ain't yer bluetooth phone. by pyrrhonist · · Score: 1
      Maybe if he riced it up a bit, and camouflaged the solar panel as a big-ass aftermarket wing or something; that and one of those "battery life extender" stickers that says "R-Type" on it

      R-Type sticker?????

      --
      Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
    3. Re:This ain't yer bluetooth phone. by hankaholic · · Score: 1
      Don't forget the need to bridge with existing open WiFi access points. Starbucks offers their networks as a service to the community, after all.

      The ones I've seen act as T-Mobile hotspots, requiring a T-Mobile account to access.

      Apparently pricing is something around $10/day or $30 a month. The Starbucks near your house may provide wireless as a public service, but the ones here near the University of Pittsburgh will make you pay a T-Mobile tax for that service.

      Anyone with experience using Starbucks wireless who can provide either more detailed pricing information or counterexamples to the T-Mobile-plan-required policy is encouraged to post.

      Obligatory article-related content: Did anyone else cringe when he said he'd eventually try to park his car in the sun to encourage charging of this device? To care so little about the poor car's finish...
      --
      Somebody get that guy an ambulance!
    4. Re:This ain't yer bluetooth phone. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obligatory article-related content: Did anyone else cringe when he said he'd eventually try to park his car in the sun to encourage charging of this device? To care so little about the poor car's finish...

      sorta, till i read it was a Honda element, will the sun really "ruin" it?

  32. Live Photos from The Guy's Car by p0 · · Score: 1

    http://tarne.fbrtech.com/~element/gomap.php

    --
    This is my sig. There are thousands more, but this one is mine.
  33. All The work I do with my stuff... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    goes against this. Encrypted root, use TOR, anonymous remailers, and so on. I travel a LOT, and I don't care to have people knowing exactly where I am, where I'm headed, or what I'm thinking. I don't dig the idea of pasting a great big electronic target on my car.

  34. but there won't be nay signal out there by CarrionBird · · Score: 1
    Sorry, had to... I tried to resist, really....

    Seriously, considering how modern state-of-the-art cell phones don't work at all in such areas (at least here in the US), I don't think the chances of getting a good data link are very high.

    --
    Free Mac Mini Yeah, it's
  35. Chick Magnet by Giggle+Stick · · Score: 1

    I don't know what kind of car it is, but if it isn't already a chick magnet, I bet it is now!

  36. Re:It'll crawl! Not really by cmefford · · Score: 1

    I use the verizon EvDO service with my linux laptop. I find the service at least as good as most "wifi hotspots" speed wise. And it doesn't break my ssh sessions all the time, isn't filtered, and has a host of other benfits. I've used my laptop, the pc5220, and an OpenWRT wrt54g to set up "free mobile hotspots" at star parties and such, and had it work "ok" for the 3 or 4 other folks using it. It's a pretty good service. Not sure where you get the barely comparable to a 56K modem from. This is true for 1xRTT service, but at least it's there. The thing about the service that does suck is the latency to the dns servers. While I can type reasonably well in a remote ssh session, the ping times to my dns servers is often in excess of 300ms, which is pretty bogus.

  37. Doppler by Enigma_Man · · Score: 1

    I wonder if Doppler shift affects this at all? I'm too just-woken-up to actually figure out how far the frequency will shift at say 60 MPH, I wonder if it's enough to push it into another channel even?

    -Jesse

    --
    Nothing says "unprofessional job" like wrinkles in your duct tape.
    1. Re:Doppler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At 60mph, channel 6 of wifi 2.417Ghz, would be doppler shifted by about 1.10973934 × 10^08

      So yeah, basically nothing

    2. Re:Doppler by bobbomo · · Score: 1

      regardless, wouldn't that only be if you were on the side of the interstate as the car zips by? enough time to maybe get an AT command in. there would be no doppler shift in the car as the Stomp Box and the laptop would be traveling at the same speed.

  38. /. effect by jimberini · · Score: 4, Funny

    DON'T CLICK ON THE LINK!!!! we're going to crash his car!

  39. Units? by FreeLinux · · Score: 1

    What units are you referring to when you quote 70up/30dn? Reading the Verizon site, they say kiloBytes per second(kBps). This indicates that multimegabit speeds are possible. But, your post appears to be saying kilobits per second(kbps) which, like a 56k modem isn't terribly exciting.

    Also, your post states higher uplink speeds than downlink speeds. Is this correct? It seems contrary to most broadband connections.

    1. Re:Units? by CharlieHedlin · · Score: 1

      Well, if you read all of the post, you would note that this wasn't with EVDO, but 1xRTT. The one time he tested EVDO he got 600kbps,

      The lack of units does suck though, and it apears that he has the up/down reversed.

      I use 1xRTT every now an then, and it is about like dialup.

  40. congratulations by nashy-nunu · · Score: 0

    I am glad it can be done. I would never have the time or money to do it. I'm glad to see people using their time and money to good use.

  41. Analyzing uploaded pics? by danharan · · Score: 1
    I've also got it interfacing with Google Maps to do live vehicle tracking via gpsd. It also uploads pictures from an on-board webcam every five minutes or so.
    Could the pics be analyzed to produce useful GIS data? At the very least could street names and circulation signs (no left turn, etc...) be recognized on pics and geocoded?

    There's a lot of interesting social software that could be built with even partial data, but the cost of the commercial sets is so high that it discourages casual hacking.
    --
    Information: "I want to be anthropomorphized"
  42. Can this be done on a GSM network? by Linuxathome · · Score: 1

    First of all, Tor and Garth, this is the coolest project I've seen in a while -- makes me want to build one myself.

    I see that the Verizon card is CDMA. Can you build a StompBox that uses GSM networks? I'm assuming you have to find the right PCMCIA card and just swap out your Verizon card and recompile your kernel. If it could be moved from 1xRTT to GSM, it could be portable to just about any GSM network worldwide! Imagine taking the box around Europe and still have internet access to email home!

    1. Re:Can this be done on a GSM network? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most OS's simply recognize the card as a PCMCIA Modem, and it shouldn't be any different for the GSM cards (so you won't even need to recompile the kernel). I've gotten my Sprint CF2031 card to work on Fedora 2, Windows XP, and Windows Pocket PC 2003. The trick is to set it up as a standard modem, find the access number the card dials to get a connection, and supply the username/password. There used to be step-by-step documentation on the web on how to do this with the CF2031 card (do a quick google search and you should be good to go)

    2. Re:Can this be done on a GSM network? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can get the instructions from cf2031.com. Click "Support", "CF2031", and then "CF2031 Dial-Up instruction for CE.Net(Handheld Type PC)" The instructions are pretty straightfoward. The important things to note (if you want to use this on another OS) is the access phone number, username/password, and port speed.

  43. Nice! by Jozer99 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    He could make some money off of this if he wanted. Silk screen a logo on his car, and set up a paypal based payment system, and he could rent the thing out to functions. Forget the car, put it all in one box, plug it into the wall at your outdoor wedding, and voila, Uncle Mirv can be there by webcam! Either that, or he could be nice, and get rid of the WEP, and drive around giving free (although brief) highspeed internet access to the masses.

    1. Re:Nice! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good Idea Dummy - That violates the terms of service and gets your account terminated:

      "Unlimited NationalAccess/BroadbandAccess: NationalAccess and BroadbandAccess data sessions may be used with wireless devices for the following purposes: (i) Internet browsing; (ii) email; and (iii) intranet access (including access to corporate intranets, email and individual productivity applications such as customer relationship management, sales force and field service automation). Unlimited NationalAccess/BroadbandAccess is for individual use only and not for resale. Unlimited NationalAccess/BroadbandAccess cannot be used: (1) for uploading, downloading or streaming of movies, music or games; (2) with server devices or with host computer applications, including, without limitation, Web camera posts or broadcasts, automatic data feeds, telemetry applications, automated functions or any other machine-to-machine application; or (3) as a substitute or backup for private lines or dedicated data connections. NationalAccess and BroadbandAccess data sessions automatically terminate after two hours of inactivity unless used with a Mobile IP-capable device. We reserve the right to limit throughput or amount of data transferred, deny or terminate service, without notice, to anyone who uses Nationalor amount of data transferred, deny or terminate service, without notice, to anyone who uses NationalAccess or Broadband Access in any manner prohibited above or whose usage adversely impacts our network or service levels. We also reserve the right to terminate service upon expiration of Customer Agreement term. BroadbandAccess kilobyte usage may not appear on your bill."

    2. Re:Nice! by Jozer99 · · Score: 1

      According to the contract, then, he has violated his user agreement half a dozen times already: 1. No server devices: That is what he made, an always on device that posts things to the internet and acts as a wireless gateway for other devices. 2. No webcams: Pretty self explanitory, he has a webcam. 3. No telemetry: He is using the device as a very complicated web based mapping locator, streaming teletry data up and down. 4. Substitute for dedicated data connections: He has said that he has often used it at work instead of his supplied land line connection. Those are just the clear violations. There are dozens of others that layers could read between the lines to find. I don't think he is too concerned with that agreement.

  44. Using google maps with GPS? by SCHecklerX · · Score: 1

    Does anybody have more information on how to do this? I'm not interested in a live tracker as much as I am interested in being able to download from my garmin and then overlay on google maps. GPS drive sorta works by using gpsbabel, but the maps that GPS drive downloads have a bad lack of detail.

  45. Next Step by imscarr · · Score: 1

    The next step will be to get it running in the flying car and adding altitude data to a 3D google map.

    --
    Like the beaver, it's just Dam one thing after another
  46. Honda Element by qqaz · · Score: 1

    Maybe not.

    --
    sup :cool:
  47. Weren't cell-phones bad enough? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now I have to deal with idots posting to /. while driving!?!

  48. Timothy - Dual Wireless Internet EVDO and HSDPA??? by evdo-hsdpa-bob · · Score: 1

    You wanna try the same thing BUT with Collaborative Wireless Daisy Chaining? OVER DUAL EVDO? let me know... i can let you use one of our new release Dual EVDO HSDPA routers wirelessinternetcoverage.com no all i need is someone to bond the two channels for me at an isp...

  49. wireless internet done on a GSM network? by evdo-hsdpa-bob · · Score: 1
    Yes... but why the heck would you want to? GSM can hardly send email at 40kbps lettalone try to do streaming data or pics even... just use HSDPA or EVDO...

    if you want to use both... for 4000kbps... then just use a evdo and hsdpa coupled dual 3g router gateway to wifi... http://wirelessinternetcoverage.com and if anyone wants to bond this together at an isp... lemme know.. i'll let you borrow one.

  50. Re:Finally!!! - wireless internet starbucks? by evdo-hsdpa-bob · · Score: 1

    actually, the point is that this evdo hsdpa system MAKES YOU a moving hotspot... no need for a starbucks... frappachinos are obsolete! :o) theres more about it at http://wirelessinternetcoverage.com

  51. This Is The Same As The Junxion Box by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow! That is very cool! Looks like you have copied the Junxion Box almost exactly. $200 for the Soekris board and box sure beats $699 for the same box that the boys in Seattle painted green. I like the fact that I can customize the software and the WiFi section on the Soekris unit. I am going to place an order for the Soekris box ASAP and build one or two myself.