Slashdot Mirror


Spyware or Researchware?

prostoalex writes "When the story of Firefox Web site visitors being predominantly male was published, many questioned the methodology used to acquire such research data. This MSNBC article talks about another research company, ComScore Networks, using a free antivirus utility to lure the Web users into downloading a small utility to their hard drives. The catch? The software watches not only sites visited, but even locations of the mouse clicks. ComScore swears the final data does not contain any personal information, but, as the article states, anti-spyware utility manufacturers are still thinking whether to include it on their list."

56 of 244 comments (clear)

  1. Gendericator by fembots · · Score: 5, Funny

    To find out the gender of a visitor, just create a site which requires visitors to hold one key while moving the mouse.

    1. Re:Gendericator by mfh · · Score: 5, Insightful

      To find out the gender of a visitor, just create a site which requires visitors to hold one key while moving the mouse.

      Or you can ask... most people are honest about their gender unless they are in a chat room. But without any social interaction nobody has a reason to lie.

      --
      The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    2. Re:Gendericator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      But without any social interaction nobody has a reason to lie.

      i'm a hermaphrodite, i have to lie, i'm never an option to them!

    3. Re:Gendericator by eric76 · · Score: 5, Funny
      most people are honest about their gender unless they are in a chat room. But without any social interaction nobody has a reason to lie.

      On the other hand, if they had a slashdot poll asking what is your sex and the possible choices were "male", "female", "none", "both", "not applicable", and "i ate a pizza for supper last night", the "male" and "female" would probably be on the low end of the answers.

    4. Re:Gendericator by OneArmedMan · · Score: 3, Funny

      http://www.bash.org/?100796

      where the men are men
      the women are men
      and everyone under 18, has a .gov ident!

    5. Re:Gendericator by Trejkaz · · Score: 5, Funny

      In Soviet Russia, the Cowboy Neal option forgets You!

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    6. Re:Gendericator by rjelks · · Score: 4, Funny

      I lie about personal information all the time. It's my small way of messing up the statistics.

    7. Re:Gendericator by fgl · · Score: 4, Funny

      Me too, Im a 99 year old grandmother of 30 from Albania, who also owns a multi-million dollar IT company that survived the .com bubble & employs over 1000 people.
      I still get porn spam though.

      --
      Go Away! Not for Sale
  2. Depends... by LewsTherinKinslayer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The difference between Spyware and Usage Statistics pretty simple: is it clearly stated to the End User and is optionable. Essentially, its not spyware if you know about it up front and have the ability to (actually,) turn it off.

    1. Re:Depends... by B'Trey · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Absolutely. This is sheer paranoia. If you go to the AV utility linked above, it clearly states:

      Marketscore is part of an online market research community with over 2 million members worldwide. Marketscore relies on its members to gain valuable insight into Internet trends and behavior. In exchange for having their Internet browsing and purchasing activity observed, members have access to free email virus scanning and other benefits. Marketscore DOES NOT sell personal information; nor do members receive any advertisements as a result of their participation.

      Unless there is evidence that they're lying and ARE actually collecting personal data or the program tries to hide itself and prevent you from uninstalling it, this is a non-issue. Absent some sort of incriminating evidence that isn't immediately apparent, the company is doing nothing wrong.

      --

      "The legitimate powers of government extend only to such acts as are injurious to others." Thomas Jefferson.

    2. Re:Depends... by pete6677 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Most importantly, is it overly difficult to remove? If the software was either carelessly created or intentionally designed to resist uninstallation, it could cause problems for the user and should be avoided.

    3. Re:Depends... by rjelks · · Score: 4, Informative

      Remember, Gator(or whatevertheyswitchedtheirnameto) isn't spyware either...they said so.

    4. Re:Depends... by Dead+Kitty · · Score: 5, Interesting

      A new question is exactly which parties does the software need to be upfront with? The Marketscore software has just recently changed it's tatics, it's no long just an issue with the End User anymore. They now are actively hiding themselves from end servers. The implications?

      Banks with online banking services have long banned authentication attempts coming from customers using known Marketscore proxies for obvious security reasons. This is due the violation of the terms & conditions presented when setting up an online banking account. The traditional Marketscore setup had client traffic sent to their proxies which was then forwarded to the intended site. This made it easy for us to track customers with "compromised" machines (Marketscore would never admit to compromising anything).

      Lately (last 1 or 2 weeks), we noticed in our server logs that connection attempts from Marketscore proxies suddenly dropped to nothing (from 100's to 0). After some investigation, we learned that the new Marketscore spyware now installs its proxy locally on the user's machine. It accumulates data in a local cache which is then sent back to Marketscore for their anaylsis. Because of this, we can no longer filter compromised machines running Marketscore shitware. Of course there's the other garbage like secretly installing their own root cert on the victim's machine, harder detection by anti-spyware programs, etc.

      Yes, maybe the user knows the benefits (and the world of hurt) they can expect from using this software...but what about the banks (or other businesses) who are actively trying to protect its customers? We're still trying to figure out how to deal with this on our side while individually informing the affected customers.

    5. Re:Depends... by Tim+C · · Score: 2, Informative

      But that's true of *any* software, no matter what its intended purpose is. Hell, I know people who avoid using Firefox, because the update mechanism (used to) leaves multiple entries in the Add/Remove Programs control on Windows.

    6. Re:Depends... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Nice to see someone else notice.

      How much do I hate ComScore/MarketScore, let me count the ways...

      1/ I *think* they use OpenSSL without giving any credit as required by the license. Evidence: http://groups.google.com.au/groups?q=comscore+open ssl&hl=en&lr=&c2coff=1&selm=bcqfh4%24mo9%241%40Fre eBSD.csie.NCTU.edu.tw&rnum=1

      2/ They actively seek little apps to install their software with. Evidence: http://groups.google.com.au/groups?q=comscore+spyw are&hl=en&lr=&c2coff=1&selm=x%25M3d.8204%24n16.579 6%40newsread2.news.atl.earthlink.net&rnum=3

      3/ They go out of their way to hide their identity from their "Panellists". Try and find a reference to Comscore on http://www.marketscore.com/

      4/ They do not care about the security of the information of their panellists. Do some research on how they previously "Broke" SSL sessions and effectively proxied all "SSL Protected" information up to their proxy servers.

      5/ They actively try to disguise thier immoral practices to gather information. Try to find any mention of "Marketscore" on this page which is the sales site to sell their services to Marketing companies. http://www.comscore.com/metrix/xpc.asp

      6/ They got Ernst and Young (I hate that company too) to "Certify" them. Read the report. It is laughable. https://cert.webtrust.org/ViewSeal?id=383

      7/ They ONLY stopped proxying SSL sessions about 3 days AFTER the New Zealand banks went public saying they were blocking their software. Other banks were doing it just less publically. How much would their customer base have been eroded if everyone who does internet banking stopped using their software. That is, I believe, why they changed.

      8/ Now they just copy your data to servers. Not sure what. The SSL stuff is encrypted. Noone knows what they send but them.

      9/ Their software silently updates without telling the user. That's nasty.

      10/ They have only JUST added an "Add/Remove" control panel. Previously there were no visible clues that it was installed.

      11/ They marketed themselves as an Internet Accelerator. They did this by using proxy technology. This is horribly slow from overseas.

      The conspiracy theorists I know believe they are a front for the NSA. :-) Reston Virginia known for this sort of stuff?

      I just know they are evil. :-)

    7. Re:Depends... by muzzmac · · Score: 2, Informative

      They USED to (2 weeks ago) collect ALL data. Even SSL traffic (Internet banking passwords and all). Now they don't do that any more. They state they throw away personal information but do state they look at Credit Card numbers. Do a five minute Marketscore Google search. They've stopped doing that recently. I'm guessing because banks have started blocking their proxy servers. Now they let the users go straight there and send the info back. (Who knows what SSL info they send. They do use some SSL)

  3. Choice by mfh · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The beef I have with spyware is that it's never given me a choice; it installs without me knowing and lurks like a drooling Rutterkin in the corner -- waiting for me to spill my drink or drop The One Ring. But this research program is optional, right?

    I have no problem with optional programs that record data to be used in a study. My wife also participates in allgery studies. So?

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
  4. Oh boy by NanoGator · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well, that story had all the right buzzwords to get the pitchforks wavin!

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  5. Antivirus software, huh? by FlyByPC · · Score: 5, Funny

    Isn't that sort of app supposed to be CHECKING for trojans? Sheesh.

    --
    Paleotechnologist and connoisseur of pretty shiny things.
  6. spyware (noun) by weighn · · Score: 5, Insightful
    any software that covertly gathers information about a user while he/she navigates the Internet and transmits the information to an individual or company that uses it for marketing or other purposes - http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=spyware

    The software watches not only sites visited, but even locations of the mouse clicks.
    add the use of the word "lure" and it makes me think that this is, indeed, spyware.

    --
    Mongrel News all the news that fits and froths
  7. What's to think about? by GoodbyeBlueSky1 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    as the article states, anti-spyware utility manufacturers are still thinking whether to include it on their list.
    How would this not be spyware, exactly? It's not like this "research" will cure cancer.
    --
    why? forty-two.
    1. Re:What's to think about? by Spiffae · · Score: 2, Insightful

      How would this not be spyware, exactly? It's not like this "research" will cure cancer.

      If it's not curing cancer it's not research? I'm not sure about that...might want to check your sources.

    2. Re:What's to think about? by damiangerous · · Score: 4, Insightful
      It doesn't at all meet the commonly accepted definition of spyware. If it were bundled as part of some other software and you didn't know about it, sure, that's very spyware and scummy. But to get this program you have to explicitly go to their web site and choose to install this one program that's very explicit about what it does. If you're not tricked, lied to or treated in any way dishonestly, there's no way you can consider it spyware. Go look at the page and tell me how they "trick" you. There are seven sentences of normal size type in the body of that page (and three headers) and one of those seven sentences explicitly states:

      "In exchange for having their Internet browsing and purchasing activity observed, members have access to free email virus scanning and other benefits."

      If that page "tricked" you, turn off your computer now and back away.

  8. If you give choice, there's no research by nigham · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Unfortunately, if they give the users a choice to turn it off, you can't qualify the statistics obtained from users who allow information to be logged as good - e.g. who's to say whether guys may be more inclined to turn it off than girls - or conversely, women feel more threatened about privacy... in either case your stats will be skewed.

    In any case most users (myself, certainly) would turn it off - I am supremely uncomfortable with some random company knowing anything about what I do on my computer.

    --
    I don't want to read /. I want to go home and re-think my life.
    1. Re:If you give choice, there's no research by dvdeug · · Score: 2, Insightful

      in either case your stats will be skewed.

      There are strict disclosure rules that psychologists have to follow before they can do a test with human subjects. It doesn't matter if your results will be skewed by warning them that they will be dumped in a vat of maggots, you still have to tell them. The rights of people to choose is more important than your right to gather information about them.

    2. Re:If you give choice, there's no research by zambuka · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Knowing the type of people that won't participate in such an experiment is just as important as the final reactions of the people who will participate.

      Thats what makes the difference between a good psych project and "just a bunch of wierdo's dunking people in nasty gunk"

  9. No... by damiangerous · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Unless it starts getting buried as part of other installs, it's not spyware. They're very upfront about what they do. There's very little text on the linked page, and one paragraph (of three) reads in the same size type as the other text:

    Marketscore is part of an online market research community with over 2 million members worldwide. Marketscore relies on its members to gain valuable insight into Internet trends and behavior. In exchange for having their Internet browsing and purchasing activity observed, members have access to free email virus scanning and other benefits.

    You have to draw the line of reasonableness somewhere. If that site isn't clear enough for you to understand what they do, you probably shouldn't be on the Internet (or at least not from a computer configuration you could hurt yourself with).

  10. Macs by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This tool then is cutting out the Mac and Linux users from their tracked demographic; together those users represent about 5-10% of the market. And they represent many early adopters of tech, too.

    I would think that the use of a tool of this kind would be enough to skew their information, causing any results to be not credible. I certainly wouldn't use them to research products that I would sell, as I would want to be able to target Mac and Linux users as well.

    --

    --
    $tar -xvf .sig.tar
  11. Re:Well, doh! by StikyPad · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It takes information without my knowing or permission and steals my bandwidth to send it somewhere.

    I know it's not hip to RTFA, but it doesn't install without your knowing or permission. It clearly states that you will allow the program to monitor your internet usage in exchange for the free antivirus software. It's easy to uninstall and doesn't leave its hooks all over the OS.

    Stealing your bandwidth? If you consent to installing it, that hardly constitutes theft.

  12. Oh, come on.. by proteonic · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Let's see.. I need an antivirus utility.
    What shall it be?
    Mcaffee.. no
    Norton.. no
    AVG..no
    Oh, wait! Here's one! Marketscore! That sounds reputable! I've never heard of them before, so they must be good, because they stay out of the "eviil media".
    --end scathing sarcasm--

    The people "lured" into downloading this utility should probably also have their right to vote restricted for lack of ability to critically process information.

    And, by the way, if you've feel vicitmized by this software, I have news for you.. they've recently changed the definition of gullible in the dictionary.

    Interpret that however you please.

  13. If it looks like a duck.... by jadenite · · Score: 2, Insightful

    quacks like a duck, and smells like a duck, then it must be...spyware seriously, people how cn you record where the mouse is clicked on my screen, and what sites I am visiting without being spyware. Saying that there is no personal information logged sounds like splitting hairs to me. This program should definitely be on the spyware list.

  14. MarketScore is included on the Black Hole DNS List by csk_1975 · · Score: 3, Informative

    anti-spyware utility manufacturers are still thinking whether to include it on their list

    If you use the blackhole dns list of spyware domains from bleedingsnort.com its already included based on this submission from doxdesk. Squid ACLs are a great way to stop these parasites and you don't have to wait for anti-spyware manufacturers to decide whether its spyware or not. Also ClamAV lets you create your own signatures so you can setup rules to detect anything you consider to be spyware.

  15. Free anit-virus? by W8TVI · · Score: 4, Informative

    Why not just download AVG Anti-virus?
    Its free, and has no spyware attached.

    1. Re:Free anit-virus? by Kevinv · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's still available:

      http://free.grisoft.com/doc/1

    2. Re:Free anit-virus? by Mishura · · Score: 2, Informative

      AVG is still Free/beer. (See other guy's post below mine or beside it for link) You just have to look for it on their website.

      ClamWin (based on ClamAV for Linux) is Free/libre Opensource and GPL'd if you prefer that. I haven't used it (Still using AVG) but I am considering trying it out myself.

  16. of course they say its spyware by indy_Muad'Dib · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Symantec, for example, designates the program as spyware on its Web site.

    A major antivirus company saying a free anitvirus program is spyware, that should raise a few red flags right there.

    1. Re:of course they say its spyware by vga_init · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Well, what is spyware? In my mind, it's a piece of software that harvests data from your computer and sends it to someone else for their own personal uses without your explicit knowledge or consent.

      By my definition, that makes the program in the article spyware.

      You're right in suggesting that Symantec may have an ulterior motive, but there exists (what appears to me) the unfortunate fact that the software actually is spyware. It may be a coincidence, or Symantec may have checked specifically on competing software, but they aren't misreporting anything.

      Black (because I like the color red and black seems more appropriate) flags would go up if a) Symantec lied about the software being spyware, or b) Symantec held a policy that only classified that software as spyware because it was competing with them, letting similar, non-competing programs go by unchecked.

  17. Choice Degrades Data Validity by rewinn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    To the extent that something forthrightly discloses what it does and offers the choice to opt-in (...and to opt-out later easily if one changes one's mind ...), the validity of the data is compromised.

    There's nothing *wrong* with giving people the choice of providing information in exchange for an incentive (... I participate in surveys & studies all the time ...) but it is not unlikely that as a result, the sample becomes non-representative (except of itself.)

    How likely is it that the genders differ in their willingnes to risk giving away personal information, such as keystrokes that may disclose physical address? I would not trust gender statistics for web usage at all, except for indicating the gender of people who don't worry much about strangers learning their meatspace location.

    It may be that some data about semi-anonymous servces such as the web is impossible to get. As Johnny Cash sings, "I don't like it, but I guess things happen that way!"

    1. Re:Choice Degrades Data Validity by Pollardito · · Score: 2, Insightful

      oh well, then they should try to make the best of their invalid data. their right to valid data can't trump their subjects' right to privacy, period.

    2. Re:Choice Degrades Data Validity by J053 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Excellent point. People who would install and use this software are (I hope) a non-representative subset of all computer users. I'd like to believe that more people have a clue than not, and the fact that these guys only have about 1 million members is kinda encouraging - when you think about how many Internet users there are.
      I hope.

  18. Knowing where I'm clicking is one thing, but by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting
    "Security professionals say ComScore dangerously slurps up all manner of personal information, including passwords for online banking services."

    Is the single scariest thing I've read, barring the end of the world that will result from the release of Longhorn.

    And
    ComScore officials said the sensitive data is never at risk.

    "We establish two secure communications. One with you, and one with the bank," Lin said.

    Is the third sariest. Of course the data is at risk, an information research company has your internet banking password, for crying out load! No one should ever have that.
    Besides you.
    And the bank has to have an ecrypted copy to check it against.
    But that's all.
    How secure is the network of a company that sells information going to be compared to a Bank?

    Mind you most people will be using windows at home, so most banking passwords are being collected through vulnerabilities at that end anyway.

  19. Bad Statistics by Morrog · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Anyone remember that common example of bad stats? Some survey was taken by calling people randomly. What's wrong with it? You're excluding everyone without a phone (which is now rare, but the poor didn't have them when this survey was done). Isn't this exactly the same? You're excluding everyone without spyware. Hey, maybe males are more likely to get spyware on their computers than females?

  20. Can They Collect Data On ... by rewinn · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... whether people who voluntarily install their program understand that they are agreeing never to shop or bank online with decent security ever again?

    It's one thing to warn someone "If you install our software, we'll monitor your net behavior".

    It's entirely another thing to say "If you install our software, you'll be relying on us never to collect your credit card number, bank password, or the birthdate/mother's name information we'd need to empty your bank account ... and you're relying on us never to be hacked."

  21. Marketscore has been around for a while by assassinator42 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It started out being marketed as a way to "speed up" web browing, much like AOL is advertising with "Top Speed" now. According to the article, they even have access to encrypted connections. It also says that your passwords and stuff are visible to them. This isn't good, and they don't really state up front that they do this. I believe marketscore has been considered spyware for a while by some people. Also, the program they give you in exchange only scans emails, or so it appears. Definentaly not worth it.

  22. Re:Well, doh! by complete+loony · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Ah, but lots of software that clearly state in their EULA's that they collect and submit information are also considered spyware. Yes they said it on their web page, but in a PR friendly way, most people will read it and not think about the privacy implications. Remember most people will give away their identity for the chance to win a chocolate bar.

    --
    09F91102 no, 455FE104 nope, F190A1E8 uh-uh, 7A5F8A09 that's not it, C87294CE no. Ah! 452F6E403CDF10714E41DFAA257D313F.
  23. 'Lure' is a loaded term... by One+Childish+N00b · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is going to nuke my karma to all Hell, but what the hey...

    A lot of Slashdotters are, as usual, not RTFA/web page in question and assuming that this is the usual spyware trick of clandestinely trojanised software pretending to be a legitimate tool - allow me to explain;

    The word 'lure' used in the summary is a loaded term - it implies (in the context the editors used) that they are somehow using this free AntiVirus tool as a means of covertly installing spyware - This company is simply offering a free antivirus product if you accept the *up front agreement* that their little utility can spy on your web browsing habits - they're not doing anything clandestine here, they're just offering their service to you for free, so they can sell the results on to advertisers to recoup costs;

    From the company's website:
    In exchange for having their Internet browsing and purchasing activity observed, members have access to free email virus scanning and other benefits.

    This is just a new way of offering a product - "here, you can have this for free, but in exchange you've got to give us stuff we can sell to our avertisers" (though they promise not to sell personal info, so presumably they'll just be selling 'web trends' data) or rather, it's the same way that a lot of so-called 'adware' operates, only they're rarely this up-front.

    Sure, it's spyware, but the text above is located right on their front page, is in easily-understandable English, and is not hidden, obscured of obfusicated in any way - if people want to give their permission for Marketscore to monitor their browsing in exchange for free software, who are /. to stop them? If you're concerned about web privacy, don't download it, but it's not like they're trying to trick anyone here.

    --
    Dealing with lawyers would be a lot less tedious if they all looked like Casey Novak.
    1. Re:'Lure' is a loaded term... by Tim+C · · Score: 2, Interesting

      While I generally agree with you, I do have two comments.

      Firstly, the editors didn't use the word "lure" at all, other than in so far as CowboyNeal chose to post this. All of the words in italics are those of prostoalex (unless he speaks up to claim that CowboyNeal changed them, of course).

      Secondly, if I had mod points, you'd be going down for that opening sentence :-)
      (No danger of that though, I've not had mod points for years)

  24. It is still spyware by aggles · · Score: 2, Informative

    Just because you know it a piece of code is spying on you doesn't stop it from being spyware. James Bond was still a spy, even when Goldfinger knew who he was. The threat comes to others who may use the machine without knowing the spyware is running. Companies buy Comscore information and actually believe it represents normal people. No wonder so many Web sites suck -aggles

  25. Hostile code - forges SSL certs by Animats · · Score: 5, Informative
    It's more than spyware. This thing reroutes all your browser traffic through their proxy. That's how they see what you're doing. It includes rogue SSL certificates so it can capture encrypted connections. Yes, they get to see all your credit card numbers. Major universities, including UCIC, UCLA, UC Riverside, UCSD, Texas Tech, Windsor, UNC, Old Dominion, Michigan, Iowa, McGill, Carlton, Cornell, American University, Stanford, and Columbia are blocking conections to Marketscore for this reason. If you have Marketscore installed at one of those schools, you get a warning page like this.

    Some banks also block online banking sessions coming in via Marketscore's proxies.

    This is the same spyware previously known as "netsetter". There's no question about this being spyware.

    Here's Stanford's Information Security Office's statement on Marketscore.

    • Security Alert: MarketScore Spyware
      11 Jan 2005

      MarketScore (also called NetSetter) is a spyware-like application that compromises the security of all data sent or received by your web browser, even on "secure" encrypted web sites. All external browser communications are re-routed through MarketScore's proxy servers, so they have access to any "secure" traffic/passwords/accounts that otherwise would be encrypted.

      If you have MarketScore installed on your computer and have used your browser for any services that require WebLogin, your password should be considered compromised. After you have removed MarketScore from your computer, we strongly recommend that you change your SUNet password. This advice also applies to any other secure web sites you may have visited with your browser.

      The Information Security Office is directly contacting owners of machines that appear to behave as if MarketScore is present.

      Technical Detail

      MarketScore reconfigures the browser to use a "proxy server" for all non-local connections, including HTTPS connections. A proxy server is a machine that acts as a middle-man, brokering web page requests intended for other sites. So if the browser on machine A wants to visit web sites C, D, and E it makes all those requests through the proxy server B. B then contacts C, D, and E and passes the results back to A. This is usually transparent to the user on machine A after the browser has been configured to use the proxy.

      Web proxies are typically used in a corporate environment where all web traffic must be controlled or inspected centrally, although in the case of secure HTTPS traffic there is ordinarily nothing the proxy can do except forward the connection or refuse it. In this case, the proxy servers belong to a company called ComScore where they collect and analyze the intercepted data.

      While ordinarily an HTTPS connection would simply pass through a proxy securely, in this case MarketScore also installs a new root certificate in your browser so that it can decrypt all intercepted SSL connections (a "man-in-the-middle" attack) without triggering a security warning from the browser. In normal operation, browsers would complain if a site certificate doesn't match the domain of the URL, but the new root certificate tells the browser to trust ComScore's site certificate for any URL.

    This goes well beyond what Marketscore claims their program does.

    That seems to settle the issue.

  26. It's spyware by PhotoBoy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If it monitors what I'm doing on my computer it should be classified as spyware. I don't care if it's for research rather than commercial uses, it's still spying.

    The fact that the spying program is included with a free anti-virus program to entice people to download it says it all.

  27. The difference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "I have no problem with optional programs that record data to be used in a study. My wife also participates in allgery studies. So?"

    Did your wife's allergy study also reveal how many times she had sex and with who?

    Did it reveal your bank account information?

    Did she have to tell the allergy researchers everywhere she drove?

    My guess is that there were limits to what the Allergy Research people asked, and even if they asked something untowards ("Excuse me ma'am, what is your breast size?"), she could say "I'd rather not tell you".

    You aren't given that choice with this bit of spyware. Its not value for value because you don't get the ability to not reveal certain information about what you're doing.

    Why people put their privacy at risk for $20 of value should be another study, but that's not what's at issue here.

  28. Re:OT:Re:mod parent FUNNY! by indifferent+children · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I eat pork chops. I eat steak. I treat my wife with respect. I do all of these things in public. Why the hell should anyone cower before the commandments of a religion that is not their own? Don't assume that Christians are the majority on /.

    --
    Censorship is telling a man he can't have a steak just because a baby can't chew it. --Mark Twain
  29. Re:WAY OT:Re:[still]mod parent FUNNY! by ender- · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I know most people don't make an issue of it, but it _is_ still a commandment, and it _is_ distressing for some of us to see.

    First of all, *if* god gave us free will, who gave you the right to complain about how and when we use that free will? If he wants to use god's name in vain then that's his god-given right. Get over it. If you don't want to see things that offend you, maybe you should stick to Christian Safe sites. Don't try to force us to curb our speech/actions based YOUR beliefs.

    Secondly, where is the commandment that says not to use the word god/God? Oh I see, you mean this one: "Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord they God in vain: for the Lord will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain".

    I hate to have to be the one to tell you this but 'God' isn't god's name. 'God/the Lord' is the substitute that the translators of the bible used to keep people from saying god's name, which is actually 'Yaweh'. They could have just as easily used "snickerdoodle".

    If you are going to follow the faith of a pointless mythology, you might as well learn it properly. Sheesh.

    Ender-

    PS. Thank you for instigating my first ever religious flame/troll post in 14 years of BBS/Internet useage. Too bad you're anonymous.

  30. check out the anti-spyware factory by hdh · · Score: 2, Funny

    Anti-spyware manufacturers? Is that like steel manufacturing? Is anti-spyware drop-forged, hammer forged, or die cast? Maybe it's extruded like cheerios.

    --
    I like toast!
  31. Personal Information by ZeroVerteX · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I consider my computer usage habits (i.e. where I click, and what I look at) PERSONAL INFORMATION! A rose is a rose, and spyware is spyware!

    --
    If it can go wrong it wnetscape: Segmentation Fault, Core dumped
  32. Wow... Ohio State Blocks it by Mattwolf7 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Marketscore is Spyware
    You have been redirected here because your computer attempted to contact a Marketscore proxy server. While it is undetermined whether or not you intended to sign up for the Marketscore service, you should be informed of the following:

    * Your communications through Marketscore are not secured:

    Even though your browser displays a lock or key and indicates that you are using a secure connection (the URL begins with https://), your traffic is being tunneled through a Marketscore proxy which has direct, unencrypted access to your "secure" connections. Secure connections should always be made directly to the intended target. The Marketscore site certificate could be used to masquerade as any domain, even after being uninstalled.

    * Proxying could threaten University security:
    Your confidentiality, and that of other OSU services, students, staff and faculty could potentially be compromised since usernames and passwords could be recovered from data collected by Marketscore (previously Netsetter) or its future owners or management. As a student or staff member of The Ohio State University, you are granted access through your login name and password, which could be accessed by unauthorized third-parties through your use of a proxy such as Marketscore.

    * Proxying does not improve internet connection speeds: While Marketscore or any similar service may claim to improve connection rates, this is not shown in research.

    * It can be construed as a violation of Resnet and the University's Acceptable Use Policy: "Users will not attempt to circumvent the ResNet firewall or any other established network services" [AUP, ResNet]. Proxying through a third party such as Marketscore does just that.

    * Marketscore can update itself: Marketscore software can quietly (without user notificatation/intervention) update itself. This means arbitrary code can be executed on your machine at any time.

    In order to resume normal web browser activity, you must remove Marketscore from your computer. Below is a guide for removing this Spyware. To be certain that Marketscore is fully cleaned from your system, these instructions must be completed in their entirety.

    Remove Marketscore:

    Uninstall Marketscore
    Open the Control Panel
    Click Start->Control Panel (or if Control Panel does not appear, Start->Settings->Control Panel), click Add or Remove Programs
    Find the Marketscore (OR Netsetter) item in the list, and click to Remove it.
    Note: If Marketscore/Netsetter do not appear in the Control Panel, then you are infected with a self-installing variant of the spyware which you will have to remove using a "hidden" uninstall feature:
    ResNet marketscore removal batch tool
    Download and run MSremove.bat

    If, after following these instructions, your machine has not been cleaned of Marketscore, please contact the ResNet Support Center at 2-HELP (2-4357).

    Equip your computer with software to protect against other Spyware and remove possible lingering elements (registry entries, etc.) of Marketscore:

    In order to assure that your computer is free of other elements that can compromise your privacy and security, ResNet highly recommends that you install software that will detect and remove Spyware.

    The two leading applications are:
    Ad Aware - The personal edition is available for free download at http://www.lavasoft.com
    Spybot Search & Destroy - This software is freely available at http://security.kolla.de
    Install one of these (installing both can cause conflicts), be sure that the spyware definitions are up to date, and scan your system periodically. Doing this, in addition to protecting your privacy and security, will help keep your computer clean and running efficiently.

    This lameness filter really sucks.... I'm not sure how i feel about OSU blocking it. I guess they do it because it hurts their network, but what if they block something else?