Slashdot Mirror


EU Trade Commissioner Enjoyed MS Hospitality

Brian Blessed writes "Today's edition of The Times contains a report that Peter Mandelson, the EU (European Union) Trade Commissioner, spent New Year's Eve as a guest of Paul Allen, the co-founder of Microsoft, in the Carribean on Mr Allen's luxury yacht. The story mentions the conflict of interest that this causes because of the protracted legal battle between Microsoft and the European Commission. Perhaps the Trade Commissioner has also been in a position to influence the progress of European Software Patent legislation?"

196 comments

  1. Perception vs reality. by winkydink · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Although Mr Allen is no longer directly involved in the management of Microsoft, he remains its second biggest shareholder. There is no suggestion that Mr Mandelson has broken the Commission's code of conduct.

    As a rule, rihc and powerful people tend to hang out with other rich and powerful people. I suspect this is more about giving the appearance of impropriety rather than any impropriety itself. Political opponents will try to make hay from this.

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    1. Re:Perception vs reality. by Zebadias · · Score: 5, Insightful

      the appearance of impropriety Mr Mandelson's record is not exactly stirling. He has been sacked from the goverment 2 times!

    2. Re:Perception vs reality. by purple_cobra · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you knew anything about Mandelson's political history you might think this incident deserves a little investigation. Any search for him at the BBC's news site should turn up some useful information.

    3. Re:Perception vs reality. by computerme · · Score: 1

      >giving the appearance of impropriety yah. the appearance of allen's stock going up if the EU leaves microsoft alone...

    4. Re:Perception vs reality. by k4_pacific · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes, in fact my company arranged a round of golf between one of our more satisfied customers and a prospective customer with the hope they would discuss our product. Kind of reminded me of when zoos put two pandas in the same habitat to see if they mate.

      Businessman: As you can see, our product...
      Zookeeper: Look everybody! He's "presenting".

      --
      Unknown host pong.
    5. Re:Perception vs reality. by garcia · · Score: 2, Informative

      As a rule, rihc and powerful people tend to hang out with other rich and powerful people. I suspect this is more about giving the appearance of impropriety rather than any impropriety itself. Political opponents will try to make hay from this.

      Then, as a rule, political persons shouldn't be putting themselves in positions that will allow their opponents such room to gripe.

      The article stated that this guy has done this three times before to such a degree that he was asked to step down.

      Looks valid to me.

    6. Re:Perception vs reality. by stinerman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "People of the same trade seldom meet together, even for merriment and diversion, but the conversation ends in a conspiracy against the public, or in some contrivance to raise prices."

      -- Adam Smith

      I think it is relevant to this topic.

    7. Re:Perception vs reality. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Political opponents will try to make hay from this.

      I'm not surprised! Peter Mandelson doesn't exactly have a clean track record with codes of conduct. He was forced to resign from the UK government twice since 1997!!

    8. Re:Perception vs reality. by nganju · · Score: 4, Insightful


      Even if Paul Allen is not involved in the management of Microsoft, as a large shareholder, he still gains a lot if Mr. Mandelson decides to go easy on Microsoft.

      I don't see how Allen's lack of direct involvement in MS management makes this a non-conflict of interest. Allen still has every motive to make nice with Mandelson.

      --
      There are 2 kinds of people in this world. Those that can keep their train of thought,
    9. Re:Perception vs reality. by killtherat · · Score: 1

      Considering most of us here are lazy asses, you comment would have been more helpful if you had copied and pasted those search results for us.
      I could go search the BBC, or I could just read aintitcool. Which do you think is more likely to happen ? ;-)

    10. Re:Perception vs reality. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, in fact my company arranged a round of golf between one of our more satisfied customers and a prospective customer with the hope they would discuss our product.

      Are you kidding? I have been on golf junkets. Comparing that to spending new years on a billionaire's yacht is silly.

    11. Re:Perception vs reality. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wonder if he'd show up and hang out with linus torvalds. Alas, LT wouldn't be able to compete with the bribes MS is offering.

    12. Re:Perception vs reality. by Pollardito · · Score: 2, Funny

      RTFBBC

    13. Re:Perception vs reality. by advocate_one · · Score: 1

      Didn't two high ranking execs from Sun and Microsoft have a round of golf together shortly before the "settlement"???

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    14. Re:Perception vs reality. by ggwood · · Score: 1

      parent wrote: "As a rule, rihc and powerful people tend to hang out with other rich and powerful people. I suspect this is more about giving the appearance of impropriety rather than any impropriety itself. Political opponents will try to make hay from this."

      But the moment you are elected or appointed to represent the interests of the people of your nation, you give up the right to associate freely with anyone you like. You have to avoid the appearance of conflict of interest.

      It just sounds like Mandelson doesn't take his job seriously. If Allen was the second largest investor in a giant multinational organization under investigation for drug smuggling, and Mandelson was in charge of prosecuting drug smugglers, it would be taken more seriously - and probably he would be fired.

      Perhaps drug smuggling is more serious then patent abuse but it is Mandelson's job to take patent abuse just as seriously.

      I don't care if there was no impropriety - the true damage is to the confidence people have in their government and to the morale of all the employees of that government. If people at the top can dance with the devil's financial backers and not get burned they can line their own pockets with the goodwill of the accused.

      Mandelson should be repremanded and asked to pay, personally, for his share of what I'm sure was a very expensive party. Then he should get back to work. As long as he pays his own way to these parties and is up front about any potential conflict of interest, he can go associating with whomever he wants.

      Same goes for Tom DeLay: ask him to personally pay for his trip, repremand him, and move on. Tying up the government on these sorts of issues is a crime.

      --
      a war on terrorism? How can we end a war on a method?
    15. Re:Perception vs reality. by tbone1 · · Score: 1
      the appearance of impropriety Mr Mandelson's record is not exactly stirling. He has been sacked from the goverment 2 times!

      Good gravy! What on earth do you have to do to get sacked by the government, twice! And how can I trick the head of the FCC into it?

      --

      The Independent: Reverend Spooner Arrested in Friar Tuck Incident - ISIHAC, Historical Headlines
    16. Re:Perception vs reality. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're Wrong. He actually RESIGNED TWICE. Not sacked.

      Check Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Mandelson

    17. Re:Perception vs reality. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      will try to make hay from this Like Slashdot

    18. Re:Perception vs reality. by ZeroZen · · Score: 1


      You're Wrong. He actually RESIGNED TWICE. Not sacked.

      Check Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Mandelson


      *Forced* to resign.

    19. Re:Perception vs reality. by biglig2 · · Score: 1

      1) Borrow an enormous ammount of money from a rich political colleague to buy a house and not declare it
      2) Try to persuade another Govt. department to give passports to wealthy party contributors.

      Hence his appointment as an European commisioner: to give you an idea of how un-sackable this makes him, find an accountant, sit them down, and ask them if they think an organisation with a $150 billion budget should still be using single book accounting.

      --
      ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
    20. Re:Perception vs reality. by Clay+Pigeon+-TPF-VS- · · Score: 1

      Everyone knows that wikipedia is never slanted or biased!

      --
      Viral software licensing is not freedom, it is in fact GNU/Socialism.
    21. Re:Perception vs reality. by kirun · · Score: 1

      You've found bias on Wikipedia? That's what the "edit" button is for!

      The resulting flamewars are no worse than, say, telling a vi user his mother uses emacs.

      --
      I'm scared of numbers that can't be written as a fraction. It's an irrational fear.
    22. Re:Perception vs reality. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > this is more about giving the appearance of impropriety rather than any impropriety itself

      For judges, that is the standard they must uphold in recusing themselves. That is, if hearing a case would create the appearance of impropriety (whether or not it would *actually be* improper), a judge is bound to recuse themself (that is, to pass the case off to another judge).

      At least, in the US. Mind you, IANAL, either.

    23. Re:Perception vs reality. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why did Adam Smith say that whenever people of the same trade meet it is to conspire against the public and contrive to raise prices?

    24. Re:Perception vs reality. by arivanov · · Score: 1

      Err... Making nice with Mandelson? I may be wrong, but I do not recall Allen being the specific orientation essential for servicing Mandelson's orifices.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    25. Re:Perception vs reality. by kirun · · Score: 1

      He'd just upgraded the RAM on his laptop?

      --
      I'm scared of numbers that can't be written as a fraction. It's an irrational fear.
    26. Re:Perception vs reality. by Clay+Pigeon+-TPF-VS- · · Score: 1

      Thank you for making my point for me. Perception of bias leads to counter-bias.

      --
      Viral software licensing is not freedom, it is in fact GNU/Socialism.
    27. Re:Perception vs reality. by SpookyFish · · Score: 1

      Yeah, RIGHT.
      Anyone who has been involved in or around a situation like this knows the real way it goes:

      " Ok, you can 'resign' now, keep your preferred stock, take your 3-6 months of severance/vacation pay, etc.. or we can make up some 'cause' to get rid of you " -- and you get jack shit unless you spend way more on attorneys than it would get you.

    28. Re:Perception vs reality. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have to avoid the appearance of conflict of interest.

      Yes, this is a concise summary of the exact attitude that we need to see out of elected or appointed officials. The appearance of a conflict of interest, IS a conflict of interest, since the appearance is just about all the public is going to know about you the official, and that undermines confidence in your position. (And it still may be true that you have a conflict of interest.)

      Officials seem to be under the misunderstanding that they live under the same rules of privacy that the rest of us do. They are wrong. In taking a public position, they are simply held to a higher standard. If they don't like that, they should resign, and let a better man assume the job. Once in such a position, they are MY employee, and I have some pretty steep standards as terms of their employment.

    29. Re:Perception vs reality. by Alsee · · Score: 1

      Didn't two high ranking execs from Sun and Microsoft have a round of golf together shortly before the "settlement"???

      Probably. However (in most cases) the heads of two companies are perfectly free to chit chat and negotiate for their mutual benefit.

      On the other hand people in government power generally are NOT free to negotiate for their personal benefit. Especially when it means abusing their power to provide someone else with special government favor and benefit.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    30. Re:Perception vs reality. by iocat · · Score: 1

      I once was kicking it with these rich and powerful people -- at a dude ranch -- and it's true. All they did was talk about how much better they would run the dude ranch, and ways to make more money from the dude ranch, and what the business of dude ranches was like. So they talked business the entire time, but they never really talked about their own businesses that much, other than to establish their rich guy bonafides.

      --

      Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

  2. Well, why not? by FlyByPC · · Score: 4, Funny

    They buy everything else in sight -- how much can the EU possibly cost, anyway?

    --
    Paleotechnologist and connoisseur of pretty shiny things.
    1. Re:Well, why not? by x_codingmonkey_x · · Score: 0

      IMHO I think things like this are really sad. If your going to be in government your task is to be thinking of your people (be that citizens or businesses). And it is expected that when someone offers bribes (which this might not have been) that you will not accept it and call the authorities. But the sad truth is that people are people.

    2. Re:Well, why not? by Timesprout · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well if you can wait till Russia join then you can probably pick the whole lot up for 27 Euros and a case of vodka.

      --
      Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
      What truth?
      There is no dupe
    3. Re:Well, why not? by waldoiverson · · Score: 1

      Would you like your answer in Euros or Dollars?

    4. Re:Well, why not? by mav[LAG] · · Score: 1

      I would have though that in Soviet Russia, the EU buys....aw, never mind.

      --
      --- Hot Shot City is particularly good.
    5. Re:Well, why not? by msanii · · Score: 1

      I like that, that's fun!!!!!!! But they do,don't they?

  3. Days of old... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What happened to cut-throat politics and business? "If you scratch my back, I still won't scratch yours, but thanks for the scratch."

    1. Re:Days of old... by Timesprout · · Score: 4, Funny

      If Peter Mandleson is behind you I dont think its to scratch your back.

      --
      Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
      What truth?
      There is no dupe
    2. Re:Days of old... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      um
      those days never existed...

    3. Re:Days of old... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeck I don't want to have that picture on my mind.

    4. Re:Days of old... by WarwickRyan · · Score: 1

      Mod parent up, best joke on /. today by a mile :)

    5. Re:Days of old... by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      Metaphorical AND literal in this case. LOL!

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
  4. Proof Positive by Yanray · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Well at least we have proof positive that U.S. polititians aren't the only dirty ones.

    --
    --"Sorry for the inconvience." Gods Last Words to his Creation
    DNA, So Long and Thanks for all the Fish
    1. Re:Proof Positive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not that we should be happy or anything that the politicians are sinking into a dark pit of scum. "Everyone else did bad things too so its ok!"

    2. Re:Proof Positive by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Nope. British politicians invented sleaze and corruption.

    3. Re:Proof Positive by dtk13 · · Score: 0

      They frogot to invite me!
      -Mike Jackson.

    4. Re:Proof Positive by dAzED1 · · Score: 0

      the Greeks were pretty good at it long before the Britian came to be ;)

    5. Re:Proof Positive by EpsCylonB · · Score: 1

      Well at least we have proof positive that U.S. polititians aren't the only dirty ones.

      You obviously haven't paid any attention to British Politics over the last 20 years.

    6. Re:Proof Positive by Urusai · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but at least Canadian ones have the decency to apologize for it.

    7. Re:Proof Positive by tbone1 · · Score: 1
      And the Egyptians probably weren't the first, either. I sometimes get this mental picture of one of my ancestors figuring out how to knapp flint tools, only to have a politician's ancestor and a preacher's ancestor use it to gain power and wealth without risk or merit.

      --

      The Independent: Reverend Spooner Arrested in Friar Tuck Incident - ISIHAC, Historical Headlines
    8. Re:Proof Positive by 91degrees · · Score: 1

      Good point.

      Makes me wonder what the attitude to corruption was in ancient Greece. Did they just accept it as part of the process, along with the rest of the political machinations?

  5. Eruope, our corporations thank EU.... by isotope23 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ahhh the benefits of centralizing power. Now Microsoft only has to buy off a few flunkies in the EU as opposed to each former European country. Much better for business.

    --
    Service guarantees Citizenship! Questions Guarantee GITMO.... Amerika Uber Alles!
    1. Re:Eruope, our corporations thank EU.... by globalar · · Score: 4, Informative

      The business community of Europe was the driving force behind the EU, the currency change, and the new demands for change in corporate merging laws between member states. This influence was secured way back when the EU was only a coal/steel trade organization.

      Make no mistake - economic interests have unified Europe, and political ones are only following suit.

    2. Re:Eruope, our corporations thank EU.... by isotope23 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sheeple are Sheeple regardless of which side of the Ocean you are on. Eventually IMO we will have one world government.

      I find it both sad and amazing that groups like the greens (which I believe have SOME valid points) rail about the corruption and power of corporations, yet their solution is to give more power to government. If you start with the premise that people are corruptable and power corrupts, how can you then endorse as a solution a greater concentration of power?

      The end result is those with power will make deals between themselves to keep the power they have or to gain more.

      --
      Service guarantees Citizenship! Questions Guarantee GITMO.... Amerika Uber Alles!
    3. Re:Eruope, our corporations thank EU.... by RealAlaskan · · Score: 1
      The grandparent said:

      Ahhh the benefits of centralizing power. Now Microsoft only has to buy off a few flunkies in the EU as opposed to each former European country. Much better for business.

      and you replied:

      The business community of Europe was the driving force behind the EU, the currency change, and the new demands for change in corporate merging laws between member states.

      Which pretty well proves his point: it's a lot easier for a big business to do ``business'' in the restraint-of-trade, suborning-officials, wink-wink-nudge-nudge sense if there's only one set of officials to deal with. That the European big businesses figured that out and laid the groundwork many years ago doesn't mean that Microsoft can't benefit by it now.

    4. Re:Eruope, our corporations thank EU.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because when a government which is truly of the people has power centralized, the power is in the hands of the people. When there is no central power, organizations of people will arise to attempt to centralize power. I have seen, in my current home town, the birth of party politics. So one can choose to centralize in a good way, or one can watch centralization occur and be left out of any power.

    5. Re:Eruope, our corporations thank EU.... by isotope23 · · Score: 1

      "So one can choose to centralize in a good way"

      That is the flaw in your argument. There is no good way to centralize power. Government is a necessary EVIL. The best you can accomplish is limiting its power to the least possible amount which allows civil society to function.

      If the majority of power is diffuse there are no major "pressure points" for someone to bribe, cajole or threaten.

      "So one can choose to centralize in a good way, or one can watch centralization occur and be left out of any power." You left out the other option, REJECT centralization. Frankly it is a mistake in my opinion to insist upon uniformity and centralization.

      Centralization whether justified by "good" intentions, or achieved through nefarious acts
      reinforces itself, and attracts more power, which in turn attracts those people who wish to
      gain power. These are exactly the type of people who are inclined to abuse power for their own purposes.

      --
      Service guarantees Citizenship! Questions Guarantee GITMO.... Amerika Uber Alles!
    6. Re:Eruope, our corporations thank EU.... by bergwitz · · Score: 1

      Sheeple are Sheeple regardless of which side of the Ocean you are on. Eventually IMO we will have one world government.
      Shrug...

      I find it both sad and amazing that groups like the greens (which I believe have SOME valid points) rail about the corruption and power of corporations, yet their solution is to give more power to government.
      I thought the Greens (in US) also wanted a less centralized government. Less centralized government and less centralized corporations amount to the same thing. Maybe I'm wrong about the Greens, but at least it seems like a good idea to me.

      The end result is those with power will make deals between themselves to keep the power they have or to gain more.
      Sad, but true.

      --
      Evolution is just a scientific theory. Creationism is not.
    7. Re:Eruope, our corporations thank EU.... by runderwo · · Score: 1

      Corporate power is in the hands of the people too. Stop buying from abusive corporations, and they disappear. Unfortunately, many people are willing to allow power to concentrate in a corporation as long as it gives them convenience today.

  6. So what else is new with politicians. by cc-rider-Texas · · Score: 3, Funny

    During the party on the Octopus, Mr Mandelson and Mr Allen greeted each other, but his spokesman insisted that "there was no substantial conversation" and that the pair merely exchanged pleasantries. This was merely an introduction. The bribes come later.

    --
    If you give a liberal an enema, he'll turn transparent.
  7. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  8. Let me be the first to say by h.+simpson · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This tastes like tinfoil to me. Paul Allen may be the second largest shareholder at Microsoft, but he's long since moved on from the Redmond giant.

    I don't think it's a great idea for people like this to be enjoying the luxuries of other rich influential people at all, but I doubt this is a Microsoft specific thing.

    This looks more improper than it truly is.

    1. Re:Let me be the first to say by downward+dog · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You may be right that...

      This looks more improper than it truly is.

      ...but your premise is wrong. Paul Allen may no longer be on Microsoft's payroll, but as their second largest shareholder, he is thoroughly invested in all of their business matters. Troubles with the EU? Paul Allen loses money. Happy times with the EU? Paul Allen makes money.

    2. Re:Let me be the first to say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, sure, granted.

      But what do you think would happen to the value of Mr. Allen's second largest holding if MS's European business is impacted?

      He may be removed from Redmond from an operations point of view, but I think it's safe to say that he still has a vested interest in the health of the company.

    3. Re:Let me be the first to say by iamwahoo2 · · Score: 1
      Paul Allen may be the second largest shareholder at Microsoft, but he's long since moved on from the Redmond giant.

      Do you think that perhaps he would be interested in increasing the value of those shares?

    4. Re:Let me be the first to say by rcs1000 · · Score: 4, Informative

      *BZZT* WRONG.

      I work in finance, and checked Bloomberg yesterday (in order to argue Allen was a significant shareholder). Shockingly, it appears as if Paul Allen has sold almost all of his shares. Very quietly.

      I tried to Google for a news story, but was unable to find one. Nevertheless, I would be very surprised if Allen had more than a small fraction of his wealth in Microsoft. (Certainly, compared to Vulture Ventures, Charter Communications, and that sports team he bought...)

      Cheers,

      Robert

      --
      --- My dad's political betting
    5. Re:Let me be the first to say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      In fact, Judge Scalia agreed with you when he got back from his last duck hunt.

    6. Re:Let me be the first to say by Thanatopsis · · Score: 1

      It looks like he has sold almost all his shares. I stand corrected and Forbes should probably change their article which still states the bulk of his wealth is MS stock. It wouldn't be so bad except that's a 2005 article. I went fishing for the information too and it's pretty hard to find as he is no longer a company insider. Here's an article from 2000 covering it.

    7. Re:Let me be the first to say by rsborg · · Score: 1
      Paul Allen may be the second largest shareholder at Microsoft...

      That's it. End. Finito. It doesn't matter what else he does, he's inextricably tied to Microsoft. Large shareholders (often large investment institutions) exert lots of influence over the long term strategy of a company.

      In this case, Microsoft easily would love for software patents to exist, and this EU Commissioner is influential in making that happen... this is clearly a conflict of interest.

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    8. Re:Let me be the first to say by Alsee · · Score: 1

      Shockingly, it appears as if Paul Allen has sold almost all of his shares. Very quietly.

      Which leads to a very very interesting thought.

      Paul Allen was a deep insider and obviously knows ALL about the tactics and abuses going on from within Microsoft, and he has quitely gotten almost all of his assets safely out of Microsoft... for a reason?? What if he was spilling the beans and giving GOOD advice to the EU Trade Commissioner on why they should nail Microsoft and how to do so?

      It's pure wild speculation... but it certainly makes one think.

      If true the ramifications would be enormous. The ensuing series of news stories would make the series of SCO news stories look like a tempest in a teapot.

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    9. Re:Let me be the first to say by rtb61 · · Score: 1

      Paul Allen did own TechTV and TechTV were never what you would call kind to Microsoft (I seem to remember both Leo and Patrick both being quite willing to give M$ a bit of a basting).

      --
      Chaos - everything, everywhere, everywhen
  9. Not a great track record. by ShaniaTwain · · Score: 5, Informative

    Conservative leaders say that Mr Mandelson, who was twice forced to resign from the Cabinet over allegations of sleaze, should learn the lessons of the past, demanding that he should be "totally open" and branding him "naive".

    TWICE?! he was twice forced to resign over allegations of sleaze?! Wow, he either has vicious enemies or he's not so much on the up and up.

    1. Re:Not a great track record. by BrittanyGites · · Score: 1, Informative

      Peter Mandelson lost his job over a dodgy house sale and was repremanded by Parliament over the affair, so it comes as no great suprise given his past history.

      --
      Ian
    2. Re:Not a great track record. by T-Kir · · Score: 3, Informative

      Mandy (Mr Mandelsons nickname iirc) was one of the main spin doctors along with Alastair Campbell and Charlie Wheelan who made the Labour party what it is today (i.e. got Blair into power). So he was a pretty powerful politician for a while, although the double resignations made it too difficult for Blair to let him have a cabinet position again.

      Note, this is AFAIK and I may have missed out some salient points... but will answer your question to some degree.

      --
      Are you local? There's nothing for you here!
    3. Re: Not a great track record. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Vicious and powerful enemies. Gordon Brown (our chancellor and master pulling Blairs' strings) was behind his ousting on both occassions.

    4. Re:Not a great track record. by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1
      he was twice forced to resign over allegations of sleaze?

      Whatever you think of his politics, he's a very shrewd operator. He's long been a close friend of [UK Prime Minister] Tony Blair, and despite the bad press (justified or otherwise) that some of his actions have drawn, he's continued a high-flying political career. His resignations have avoided a lot of the amateurish fall-out that some of his peers (David Blunkett and Clare Short, for two examples) incurred by messing up the PR, by taking him out of the limelight just long enough for the public to forget any transgressions he might have committed. Of course, they also get him nicely spoofed on the political satire shows, but such is the price of celebrity. ;-)

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    5. Re:Not a great track record. by tyroneking · · Score: 2, Interesting

      He is sometimes an idiot (getting people to co-sign mortgages) AND he's gay (which earns him enemies for sadly obvious reasons) AND he is a friend of Tony Blair (which earns him enemies from his own side).
      Nonetheless he did help to architect Labour's first election win for many years and I think he had a good reputation within his local constituency (Hartlepool - where they hung a monkey because they thought he was invading Frenchman- a long time ago of course but still very funny).
      He has been forced to resign a couple of times but usually for incidents blown-out-of-proportion by his enemies, but unfortunately for incidents just like this one.
      if he's doing anything wrong this will surely be the end for him.

      I like him 'cause he's as stupid as I am.

      From the Guardian profile:
      - Neil Kinncok: "He's not half as good as he thinks he is and not half as bad as everyone else thinks he is."

    6. Re:Not a great track record. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Hey Americans!

      Are you sick of reading about sleazy U.S. politicians scoffing at the public trough while really serving their corporate paymasters? Feel like a change?

      Yes... just across the Atlantic Ocean is a poltical system that has had centuries more to develop all kind of juicy and sordid sleaze and corruption. Yes... in lovely rainy London you can find all the grift and payola you are used to at home, plus many *many* new tricks.

      Want to see our star players? Number one on the roster of reptilian sleazoids is Peter Mandelson (or Mandy as he is known). Famed for his secretive trips to Brazil to have sex with bronzed Beach-boys, and *twice* fired from a job as cabinet minister for blatant corruption and rank dishonesty, Peter still manages to rise from the dead like a Romero zombie and fall into a cushy unelected unaccountable yet enormously powerful position on the European commission. So come, Americans, learn from the best. Mandelson is available for speeches and lecture tours.

    7. Re:Not a great track record. by wankledot · · Score: 1
      "Hartlepool - where they hung a monkey because they thought he was invading Frenchman-"

      I have no idea what you just said, but my head hurts now. Hung a monkey?

      --
      My sig is blank, I typed this by hand.
    8. Re:Not a great track record. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (Hartlepool - where they hung a monkey because they thought he was invading Frenchman- a long time ago of course but still very funny)

      Didn't they elect one as mayor a little while ago? (Well, the football club mascot, anyway.)

    9. Re:Not a great track record. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have no idea what you just said, but my head hurts now. Hung a monkey?

      "Hung" is the past tense of "hang". Hanging someone means subjecting them to a particular form of execution that involves suspending them by a rope around the neck.

      "A" is the indefinite article.

      "Monkey" refers to a species of simian primate.

      The people of Hartlepool hung a monkey thinking it was a Frenchman. The money was, of course, given a trial and a chance to defend itself.

      If you still don't understand then I don't think I can be of any more assistance.

    10. Re:Not a great track record. by m50d · · Score: 1

      He's friends with the PM, took a fall for him once, and thus knows he's safe.

      --
      I am trolling
    11. Re:Not a great track record. by tyroneking · · Score: 1

      Yes!
      England is great!
      We have nukes to protect us against the French!
      In England, French Fries are called chips!
      We have English mustard!

    12. Re:Not a great track record. by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


      ...taking him out of the limelight just long enough for the public to forget any transgressions he might have committed.

      Oh, I don't know about that... there are plenty of us who remember him well enough to want him out of British politics permanently. But then that's why he was handed the position in the EU - power without visibility. The hand of Tony Blair reaches far.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    13. Re:Not a great track record. by Anonymous+Brave+Guy · · Score: 1
      The hand of Tony Blair reaches far.

      Probably as far as the early hours of 6 May. After that, all bets are off. ;-)

      --
      If you disagree, post your argument. (-1, Overrated) isn't your personal censorship tool for views you don't like.
    14. Re:Not a great track record. by tbjw · · Score: 2, Informative

      When 'hang' is used to mean 'to kill by suspending from the neck' the past tense is more properly 'hanged'.

    15. Re:Not a great track record. by Frizzle+Fry · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have no idea what you just said, but my head hurts now. Hung a monkey?

      "Hung" is the past tense of "hang". Hanging someone means subjecting them to a particular form of execution that involves suspending them by a rope around the neck.

      That would only be the right past tense if they had been hanging a painting or other inanimate object. Here, one would say that the monkey was "hanged".
      --
      I'd rather be lucky than good.
    16. Re:Not a great track record. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah TWICE!
      IMO the biggest problem we have in Europe today is that you can not really get rid of those sleazy and stupid guys. They just can not be simply sacked any more, they are always "sacked" to Bruxelles. This is what will cut our throats.

    17. Re:Not a great track record. by mikiN · · Score: 1

      We have English mustard!

      Yeah, and guess where that word comes from?

      --
      The Hacker's Guide To The Kernel: Don't panic()!
    18. Re:Not a great track record. by NetNifty · · Score: 1

      French fries != Chips.

      Chips are cut wider than fries, and fries are usually saltier.

  10. invitation by ch-chuck · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'll extend an invitation to the TC for a hiking/camping trip any time he wants to discuss FOSS. If everything goes well, I'll even break out the marshmallows.

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
  11. A night to remember. by millennial · · Score: 5, Funny

    It all started at the party. Peter noticed Paul staring at him the whole time, and knew that he had to do something about it. He walked over to Paul and waited for him to say something.
    Mandleson and Allen gazed longingly into each other's eyes. They knew that the moment was right, and if everything was perfect, there would be magic tonight.
    "Whatever shall we do, Paul?" Peter said with a coy smile.
    Paul just grinned and patted his hand. "How about we go into the bedroom and ... talk about those patents?"
    Seriously. Homoeroticism abounds in this article. Two men spending New Year's Eve on the Caribbean in a private yacht? Whoa.
    Anyways, to continue the story...
    It was a night to remember. The two were up all night long, engaging in passionate discourse about patent restrictions on software in Europe. They say that private bargaining is like eating at a Chinese restaurant - it's not over until everyone gets their cookies. Paul got his patent cookies, and Mandelson got his legal jibblies off.
    They knew that they could tell no one, so they told their spokespeople that "there was no substantial conversation" and that they had merely exchanged pleasantries.

    I like my version better.

    --
    I am scientifically inaccurate.
    1. Re:A night to remember. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You thought it'd be funny but....

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Mandelson

      foot -> mouth? :)

    2. Re:A night to remember. by millennial · · Score: 1

      I already knew that he worked with patents. That's no secret, although he tried to hide it for many years.

      --
      I am scientifically inaccurate.
    3. Re:A night to remember. by Moofie · · Score: 1

      "Exchanged pleasantries". What an euphemism! Wonder who was catching?

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    4. Re:A night to remember. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mommy, why is Peter Mandelson walking funny?

    5. Re:A night to remember. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? A smarmier, more odious, less trustworthy, little toe rag would be harder to find. Grima Wormtongue might find him a positive role model, I suppose.

    6. Re:A night to remember. by Alsee · · Score: 1

      patent restrictions on software in Europe

      Is that a euphemism for "cock ring"?

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  12. Foul play by Before+The+End+Chaos · · Score: 2, Funny

    Political enemies don't have to be personal enemies too, even as fun as it'd be if they were all out for each others blood off of work hours.

    --
    If you think you're a hardcore roleplayer, come prove it to us at ArmageddonMUD.
    1. Re:Foul play by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

      No they dont , but political figures cant take bribes from political loby groups if it causes an obvious conflict of intrests

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
  13. Godbye Ethics , Hello luxuary cruise by FidelCatsro · · Score: 4, Informative

    How in the hell he thought it , Either A: acceptable , or B: a good idea , is simply beyond me .
    Here is a man of immense power and persuasion taking what ammounts to a large bribe from microsoft and i have no doubts he was having a good drink enjoying ways to amicably let microsoft off on the fine , the opening up thing , oh and the Patent issue.

    Tonight i am going to write a letter to my MEP and urge that they raise a question as to whether he should be thrown out of this position imediatly , and at the very lest that he get some awnsers as to why he thought this behaviour beffiting of a politican.

    I do not want large lobby groups and private industry to have a strangle hold over the european commision , and if people like this are in office then i am begining to lose hope .

    This will not stop me kicking up a fuss , and if you agree with me i urge you to do the same .A letter is sometimes all it takes (oh and while you at it , make sure to bug you MEP again about the patents issue)

    --
    The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    1. Re:Godbye Ethics , Hello luxuary cruise by bmalek · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Tonight i am going to write a letter to my MEP and urge that they raise a question as to whether he should be thrown out of this position imediatly , and at the very lest that he get some awnsers as to why he thought this behaviour beffiting of a politican.

      The fact is that no matter where one lives this type of behaviour is exactly how politicians act. While we the people may not like it, this type of behaviour is seen as "normal" and practically "accepted" by today's society. The fact is that most people don't care whose pocket politicians are in as long as they follow the N.I.M.B.Y. (look up George Carlin) approach to the area they represent.

      While writing letters and protesting people online may make one feel better, the only real way to eforce change is to act. The problem is that because the politicians have all the money already, your voice is often removed from the public view.

    2. Re:Godbye Ethics , Hello luxuary cruise by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

      Letter writting is acting ;) , problem is that is all most of us can do is write letters , Myself i do intend on standing for a seat as an MEP ..Unfortunatly i am a bit to young to really consider it ( 30 seems to be a good age to start).
      I still strongly belive in the power people have , and letter writting campaign do work if you make it clear that this can make or break a vote.

      If you recive 20k letters saying "we as your constituants , wish you to do blah or else we vote for the other guy " then politicans do listen (if your not in office , then its hard to get your bribes)
      this method has been missused by people before to push views on the general public , and whilst i shudder at that hapening i think this is the only way to realy get the publics opinions to stand up against the cash bribes .

      The key is to write one letter , not a stream of them(under diffrent names) as some groups do . Then we have done the right thing (mass mailing under difrent names to force an issues makes us no better than the Lobyists).

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    3. Re:Godbye Ethics , Hello luxuary cruise by Taladar · · Score: 1
      While writing letters and protesting people online may make one feel better, the only real way to eforce change is to act
      If the former does not help do you mean a revolution by 'act' in the second part of the sentence?
    4. Re:Godbye Ethics , Hello luxuary cruise by ScentCone · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Would we have had all this fuss if he'd had a nice lunch with Linus? A guy as powerful as this isn't going to be "bought" by the experience of staying on a nice boat for the weekend, or by the experience of Paul Allen's (no doubt stimulating - I'd like to meet him myself) company. The question is, can you point to the means by which the company in which Allen owns a lot of stock is going to have a "strangle hold" over the commission? In actual, practical, detailed, terms, what strangling mechanism is at play here? How does socializing among rich people induce force, etc., into the picture? If the guy's taking money from Allen or via Allen, don't you think that would stick out like a sore thumb?

      I don't seem to recall the same reaction, say, in the US, when 99% of the entertainment industry's rich people invite elected officials to their yachts/homes/islands/etc for a week away. Or when European heads of state or key politicians are sitting down to extravagent meals together with the rich and famous throughout Europe. Let's face it: the only reason this is being shouted about as shocking here on slashdot is because the rich person in question has ties to Microsoft. If it was someone who owned a pile of stock in DaimlerChrysler, or Software AG, or BP, or Honda, no one would even have said a word.

      Oh, and why exactly would you want a trade commissioner who doesn't have the ear, and doesn't hear from the people who back the largest companies, move around the biggest piles of money, and who are involved personally in the very trading activities that you're supposed to be understanding? A commissioner with no industry connections, or who only hangs out with the people running, say, labor unions, is going to be seriously naive, only have half the story, and definately be at odds with industry. Without those industries, there would be no point in talking about trade at all, let alone convening a commission to deal with it.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    5. Re:Godbye Ethics , Hello luxuary cruise by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

      Well obviously you didnt read my comments on those events did you , as i think it should mean imediat dismisall.
      If he had dinner with linus i would find it equaly as unforgivable (although he isnt currently in litigation agains linus), so dont try to make this an issue of the BIG EVIL MS vs The good and valiant Linux , This is an issue of ethics.

      The simple reason i would want a trade commisioner who hears from the people not the big companys , Perhaps some trade decisions that would benifit the people of the EU not the companys and industrys .I dont have a problem with the trade commisionar talking to these people as you imply , i have a problem with him acepting a luxary crusie .

      I dont mean to snap , but this really gets my ire .
      The man has twice before been removed from office for sleezey behaviour and now a story about him taking a cruise with MS(remembering they are currently taking action against MS)

      Remember " A guy as powerfull as this" has been bought off atleast twice before(that we know of)

      so remember ,Talking to MS is acceptable but Acepting luxary vacations with one of the founders is a no no , and i hope i dont need to explain why.

      Again i apoligise , I dont mean to come off too agresive

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    6. Re:Godbye Ethics , Hello luxuary cruise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Before you write, I suggest you invest in a spellchecker. You'll be taken more seriously.

    7. Re:Godbye Ethics , Hello luxuary cruise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OH NO Anon cowtard is a grammar TROLL OMG NO NOOOOO NOOOO , your making me change my ways oh anon coward
      Before you write , I suggest you invest in some pot and relax and the language is doomed anyway .

    8. Re:Godbye Ethics , Hello luxuary cruise by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      I'm actually less concerned about this particular commissioner - certainly residents of Europe are going to be a lot more familiar with him than I am. I think I'm reacting more to the general tone of the comments on this topic: Politicians Who Hang Out With Rich People Are Evil. That sort of sweeping generalization (and you've seen it here, I'm sure) is just silly. And more to the point, it seems to come more from the idealogical camp that gets really upset with it, but not when it's say, George Soros they're making friends with. Know what I mean?

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    9. Re:Godbye Ethics , Hello luxuary cruise by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

      I agree entierly , I am from europe ;) so you can understand why im so up in arms . Alot of people do resort to the OMG rich freinds == evil argument which is just wrong , but in this case the guy i belive the guy A:) has the prior record , and B) has a strong conflict of intrests.
      I understand fully where you comming from though , and trust me ive done the same thing many times here myself .

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    10. Re:Godbye Ethics , Hello luxuary cruise by Threni · · Score: 1

      > Godbye Ethics , Hello luxuary cruise

      I guess luxuary comes before February? I was just happy to see that Microsoft can sometimes provide an experience which is enjoyable.

  14. Very nice.. by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Insightful
    There are those born with no shame. The rest of us suffer with our consciences.

    Reminds me of former Detroit Mayor Coleman Young, who had quite the large collection of priceless gems, for someone who got by on a mayor's salary. There was a reason Detroit kept getting worse and worse and it couldn't all be blamed on Ford, GM and Chrysler.

    Isn't Paul Allen away from Microsoft? I thought he left the company and took his billions of $ to pursue his own dreams.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  15. Mandelson has only one priority by l-ascorbic · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ..his own power.
    For those who are not familiar with him, Peter Mandelson is one of the most skilled, cynical and cunning politicians in recent British history. A true heir to Macchiavelli's crown, he has shown himself unparelleled in his ability to attain and retain power. The guy has been sacked from the British cabinet on two occasions, but still managed to emerge with his acreer intact. His trick is to make himself invaluable as the right hand man of the guy with the power. First Blair, now Barrosso. He is not the sort to be bought by Microsoft. He will stay close to them just as long as they are useful to him and no longer. I think this a case where the cynical MS lobbyists have met their match.

    1. Re:Mandelson has only one priority by Ironsides · · Score: 1

      He will stay close to them just as long as they are useful to him and no longer. I think this a case where the cynical MS lobbyists have met their match.

      Have you ever heard of Achilles from the Enders Game universe by Orson Scott Card?

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    2. Re:Mandelson has only one priority by l-ascorbic · · Score: 1

      In a word: no.

    3. Re:Mandelson has only one priority by sepluv · · Score: 3, Funny
      Alternatively, maybe Mandelson and Allen (and, therefore, the €C and M$) are working as allies to milk the most out of the European people for their own ends.

      This is, of course, a totally crazy conspiracy theory and would in no way be representative of the normal behavour of European commisioners (especially the stain-free* Mandelson) or founders and shareholders of Microsoft.

      * talking of stains, how much do you bet they weren't just talking on this yacht on new year's eve. Mandelson is defintely gay (and known for his homosexual affairs with others in power). No idea about Allen--but maybe it was a you-give-me-a-blowjob-and-we'll-drop-charges-again st-Microsoft sort of deal.

      --
      Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley
      [This post is in the public domain (copyright-free) unless otherwise stated]
    4. Re:Mandelson has only one priority by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quite. It's well known that the only reason gay men ever spend time with other men is to have sex with them.

    5. Re:Mandelson has only one priority by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First Blair, now Barrosso, next week Billy.

      Yup, I see a modus operandi here.

    6. Re:Mandelson has only one priority by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever heard of Achilles from the Enders Game universe by Orson Scott Card?

      I have. Good comparison, I'd never have thought of Mandelson like that.

  16. Good old Mandy by rleyton · · Score: 5, Informative
    Hoho, Mandelson never learns. So much for third time lucky. For the non-Brits that might be around, Peter Mandelson is something of a Blair loyalist, who is actually now in his third senior political incarnation.

    First up, he was in the cabinet culminating in Trade Secretary, but had to resign after it was discovered he had taken a loan of £373,000 (about $700,000) from another minister and not declared it in the public records.

    A few years later, long enough for Blair but not the rest of the population to forget, he was back "resurrected" as it were (apt, as he's also known as the Prince of Darkness) to be the Northern Ireland secretary. Guess what, not that long after it transpired he was involved with a dodgy claim by some rather wealthy businessmen to gain British passports.

    He got the Trade Commissioner job by merit Blair being blind to his foibles. So, now we discover that he's been taking benefits in kind, presumably rather on the sly, from a co-founder of Microsoft that just happens to have been landed with a hefty fine by the EU.

    Why am I not surprised?

    More here on the esteemed gentlemans career if you don't like bitter and twisted British political mumblings.

    --
    ooooooh! What does this button do? - DeeDee, Dexters Lab.
    1. Re:Good old Mandy by isotope23 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Hoho, Mandelson never learns."
      "who is actually now in his third senior political incarnation"

      As exemplified in your own post I'd say the guy has learned quite well.

      --
      Service guarantees Citizenship! Questions Guarantee GITMO.... Amerika Uber Alles!
    2. Re:Good old Mandy by advocate_one · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I am convinced that Mandelson has got the "goods" on some aspect of Tony Blair's past... it's the only explanation for why he keeps getting called back despite his many indiscretions.

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
  17. Slashdot article brief is incorrect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It should say twiced disgraced Peter Mandelson:

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/1134868.stm

    Peter Mandelson a very despised person in the UK who much suspicion surrounds (even by his own fellow Labourites). He is associated with New Labour's spin and deceit. Anything new he has his dirty fingers in comes as no suprise.

    Like a zombie Mandelson is hard to kill, and keeps coming back in new forms everytime he is gibed.

    1. Re:Slashdot article brief is incorrect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  18. Word is... by dbleoslow · · Score: 4, Funny

    Linus invited this guy on the same day to hang out, discuss kernal optimization and play some D&D but was turned down in favor of Allen.

    1. Re:Word is... by Danuvius · · Score: 1
      Linus invited this guy on the same day to hang out, discuss kernal optimization and play some D&D but was turned down in favor of Allen.


      ELITIST JERK!!
      --
      Akarsz Magyar Gentoo fórumot? Akkor
    2. Re:Word is... by tbone1 · · Score: 1
      Linus invited this guy on the same day to hang out, discuss kernal optimization and play some D&D but was turned down in favor of Allen.

      Probably because Allen could get better drugs from his players on the Trailblazers.

      --

      The Independent: Reverend Spooner Arrested in Friar Tuck Incident - ISIHAC, Historical Headlines
  19. The Octopus by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 4, Informative
    Peter Mandleson, the EU (European Union) Trade Commissioner, spent New Year's Eve as a guest of Paul Allen, the co-founder of Microsoft, in the Carribean on Mr Allen's luxury yacht.
    Ah, yes, the Octopus ... What a hulking beast of a ship!
    1. Re:The Octopus by sploxx · · Score: 1

      Heh, funny. The title pages features the ship cruising through the kiel canal near my home city, Kiel Germany. Apparently the ship was built here.
      In fact, the part of the canal shown here is next to an old bridge (Brücke Levensau) across the canal (the picture is taken from the bridge, I suppose). I very often drive the hill at the waterside behind the ship down with my bicycle.
      The location is only a few km (max. 2) from my home, so it was VERY funny and astonishing to see that on slashdot :-)
      OTOH, Mr. Allen seems to have WAY too much money...

  20. Virgin Galactic the real reason? by StacyWebb · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Does it not make more sense that the meeting, would involve Allen's role in Virgin Galactic (owned by Richard Branson you remember him, british guy)not his ties with Microsoft and their role in the EU.

  21. Doesnt matter who he spends his time with by rjdohnert · · Score: 1, Troll

    Paul Allen is no longer an employee, partner or shareholder at Microsoft anymore. He gave up everything. The European Council put on Microsoft one of the largest fines EVER imposed by the EU so I doubt very much he was influenced. As for Software patents, I cant wait until they pass, Im a huge supporter.

    1. Re:Doesnt matter who he spends his time with by Thanatopsis · · Score: 1

      Paul Allen is the second largest shareholder of Microsoft. He own roughly 9% of the company. Additionally he still sits on the board of Microsoft. But he doesn't have anything to do with MS as he stopped working there. He stopped working there because he doesn't have to work. That frigging ship of his is right out of a fucking Bond movie.

    2. Re:Doesnt matter who he spends his time with by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to TFA he is the second largest shareholder of Microsoft.

    3. Re:Doesnt matter who he spends his time with by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 2, Informative
      Paul Allen is no longer an employee, partner or shareholder at Microsoft anymore.

      Hogwash. He is still the second largest shareholder.

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    4. Re:Doesnt matter who he spends his time with by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, the US Government and the SEC seem to think he's NOT the #2 shareholder:

      sez Yahoo

    5. Re:Doesnt matter who he spends his time with by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

      Apparently he WAS the second largest shareholder.

      --
      And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.
  22. The Prince of darkness by dhopton · · Score: 2, Funny

    This suprises you because...? It's peter mandleson, the prince of darkness, the arch overlord of the bad-things.

  23. Fraud in government? by nurb432 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Gasp! Who would have ever thought.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  24. FYI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    In the UK Peter Mandleson was referred to in some sections of the British Media as 'The Prince of Darkness'. I'll leave it up to /. readers to guess why. He could also be called the 'Comeback King.' He has had to resign twice from high ranking British government positions due to misdemeanors yet has rebounded on both occasions. See http://www.answers.com/topic/peter-mandelson for details. He is a man to watch closely.

    1. Re:FYI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      More information for non UK readers

      This could be considered off-topic but it looks at the interesting practices closely associated with Mandelson and the party he serves UK Labour Party, that of spin doctor

      The term spin doctor could be interpreted politely as one who is "responsible for ensuring that others interpret an event from a particular point of view." Does the company 'Microsoft" employ such practioners????

      Now witness a spin doctor, attached to the same party as Mandelson, in action. This is taken from Britain's Independent newspaper. It has a delicious ending.

      While others watched the horrific television pictures from New York and Washington on 11 September last year [2001], Jo Moore, personal spin doctor to the Transport Secretary, Stephen Byers, sent an email saying that it would be a good day to "bury bad news". Obviously, it did not occur to her that emails can be stored on computers - and passed on to journalists. Ms Moore lost her job.

      Spin is dreadful practise and sadly its not confined to Politics. For those wishing to pursue further reading on the matter check out the link SpinWatch (http://spinwatch.server101.com/index.php")

      Note to the Slashdot staff. You should ask for readers to write in sometime of their experiences of spin in the companies they work for. Should make for some enlightening reading.

  25. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  26. The name is "Peter Mandelson", not Mandleson. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 2, Informative


    Slashdot editors can be so disgusting sometimes. The name is "Peter Mandelson", not Mandleson. BBC News Online's Nick Assinder looks at the turbulent career of Peter Mandelson. His "career had twice been dashed on the rocks of sleaze, ..."

    Peter Mandelson is apparently the go-to guy in the EU when someone wants something illegal done: "Mr Mandelson had come under pressure to explain his involvment in the passport application of Srichand Hinduja, an Indian billionaire who, along with his brother Gopichand, appeared in court in connection with a 1986 arms dealing scandal."

    Conflict of interest is extremely destructive of good government even when it is only the appearance of conflict of interest.

    The U.S. government has become a conflict of interest machine: Unprecedented Corruption: A guide to conflict of interest in the U.S. government.

    1. Re:The name is "Peter Mandelson", not Mandleson. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is so important because if you get a person's name wrong it really screws up google searches and all you find are the other people who also got the name wrong.

  27. Paul Allen is not part of MS by Barlo_Mung_42 · · Score: 1, Informative

    He left MS in 1983.

    1. Re:Paul Allen is not part of MS by cpghost · · Score: 1

      That doesn't tell us which MSFT stock options he directly or indirectly holds.

      --
      cpghost at Cordula's Web.
  28. Apologies in advance... by nganju · · Score: 0, Redundant

    If only microsoft hadn't dropped its support for gay rights yesterday.

    I can see the headlines already:
    "Peter, Paul, Married"

    --
    There are 2 kinds of people in this world. Those that can keep their train of thought,
    1. Re:Apologies in advance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, that way they can puff on the magic dragon all they want.

  29. A crooked politician by deaddrunk · · Score: 1

    Well I never. But then Mandelson is famous for doing this sort of thing.

    --
    Does a Christian soccer team even need a goalkeeper?
  30. Allow me to make a correction. by kahei · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Hoho, Mandelson never learns.

    That is _so_ cute! Cute but annoying.

    Pull up a pouffe, son, and allow me to explain. He has learned that he can get away with anything -- because who's going to demand honesty? You? The Labor Party?? He knows you'll vote for whatever keeps the Evil Capitalists away. He's adapted well to the environment you have created for him. A+ for learning, Mr. Mandelson!

    You, like the rest of the British public, have failed to learn, preferring the 'bluebottle trying to fly through a closed window' model. This is because as a community you have the self-preservation instincts of a kamikaze plane full of lemmings.

    All clear? Recap: he and his freinds are exploiting you and your peers to a degree quite unprecedented in the last 100 years in the UK -- and you are tutting fondly because 'he never learns'. The next phase of this process is extinction.

    --
    Whence? Hence. Whither? Thither.
  31. I hope Paul Allen by Insipid+Trunculance · · Score: 4, Funny

    served some Guacamole.

    --
    Wanted : A Signature.
  32. Re:Mandy's at it again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is old sh1t. Try a similar comparison with SELECT [MEMBER] & [PARTY]_[FROM]_[COUNTRY] & [BACKHANDERS]

    From a Politico/al group of your choice - they are all Wealthy|Corrupt|Slippery.

    The only difference is that 'some' political systems are a 'little' less twisted+rich (& likely to be lawyers) outside the Rulers Of The World.

  33. Re:A stairway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Please go stand by the stairs.

  34. Welcome to reality by c0ldfusi0n · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you think that there's no corruption, lobbyism or influence in these spheres, you need a reality check. It is quite possible that Mandleson was influenced by Allen, and it's quite possible that it's exactly why he accepted to go on that yacht. I mean, come on. If OSS developers could afford the same things, you think they wouldn't show off how lucrative their endeavours are? In this particular case, i think the goal was more to share this lucrativity and showing it off just to send the message "What if..".

    Or they could just be friends, you know. Those things happen.

    --
    A computer makes it possible to do, in half an hour, tasks which were completely unnecessary to do before.
  35. EU better than US? by sac13 · · Score: 0, Troll

    I admit that the powers that be in the US are corrupt. There are many people that claim we have a monopoly on that. It's nice to actually see some evidence on Slashdot that the holier-than-thou Europeans are just as greedy... that subject tends to get ignored by a lot of people around here.

    Now mod me flamebait...

  36. ...or ramen noodles with Linus? by mojoNYC · · Score: 1

    if you were a politician, which would you rather do, given the choice?

  37. Re:American Flag? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Right after you're finished with that 3rd world country called Iraq, huh? LOL.

  38. In other news.... by AviLazar · · Score: 1

    ....EU lifted all penalties, sanctions and restrictions from Microsoft. Quoted from the commissioner "After long hard thinking through the New Year, we decided to turn over a new leaf. Those MicroSoft guys work really hard to provide us with an extravegant holiday season...I mean well written software."

    --

    I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
  39. so... by mr_tommy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Mandleson resigned from the British Cabinet twice for sleaze related activities; it's nice to see that times don't change the man, and he can really stand on his moral podium in Brussels.

  40. Paul Allen is out of Microsoft. Way out. by Animats · · Score: 2, Insightful
    He left Microsoft in the 1980s. It's generally agreed that this was good for Microsoft. Allen's businesses since then, from Interval Research to the Experience Music Project to the Seattle Seahawks, along with a long list of little companies, have generally been flops. The phrase "the hell that is a Paul Allen company" is known in Silicon Valley.

    You don't want to take a ride on his yacht. It might sink.

    1. Re:Paul Allen is out of Microsoft. Way out. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Paul Allen is one of the major players behind SpaceShipOne. I wouldn't consider making history a flop, but if you think so...

  41. You have no idea how improper it really is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The fact is, no one knows exactly what went on except a handful who were on the boat and they aren't going to give a straight answer.

    One of the REQUIREMENTS for a job of public responsibility is to be seen AT ALL TIMES to be behaving properly. Don't make excuses for this guy, he knows what is expected of him and it that's too difficult then by all means he can hand his EC job over to someone more deserving of the position.

  42. It wouldn't be the first time... by cruachan · · Score: 1

    That Mandleson has been exposed as being bent

  43. link doesn't prove your point re: Allen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Exactly where does it say he's the #2 shareholder of Microsoft? Specifically, it says:

    "Has been slowly selling off Microsoft stake ever since [1983."

    Moron.

  44. Detals of Paul Allen's yacht [PowerPoint] by Zemplar · · Score: 2, Funny

    A very impressing ship indeed! Very interesting detail of his yacht... http://kimmershow.com/fileTamer/TheOctopus.pps#54

  45. Re:WHINE WHINE WHINE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    what a bunch of morones!
    Given what we all know about the slashdot crowd, we are at least not a bunch of "boney morones!" :)
  46. You're probably right by jd · · Score: 1

    I'd say that he's also beaten John Morton, too. (Although the specifics of Morton's Fork are to do with tax, the premise can be used anywhere. Just decide the conclusion first, and show how all possible situations will lead to it.)

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  47. Zonk, you're an idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Paul Allen is not affiliated with Microsoft any longer and is not a major shareholder:

    sez Yahoo

    You may want to revise the incorrect headline.

    Frickin' slashdot "editors."

  48. open source lobbying by bytesmythe · · Score: 2, Funny

    I wonder why he didn't spend time on Eric S. Raymond's luxury yacht? (I suspect because it's actually pronounced Throat Warbler Mangrove.)

    --
    bytesmythe
    Hypocrisy is the resin that holds the plywood of society together.
    -- Scott Meyer
  49. Allen is not current #2 microsoft shareholder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Steve Ballmer is:

    Yahoo Finance

    You had the tinfoil on and didn't realize it.

  50. Hanging a monkey..... by TAZ6416 · · Score: 1

    http://www.thisishartlepool.co.uk/history/thehartl epoolmonkey.asp/

    Although at least they don't have sex with sheep like the Welsh.

    Jonathan

    1. Re:Hanging a monkey..... by advocate_one · · Score: 1

      I have never, ever understood why anyone would ever want to have sex with a sheep... they're absolutely filthy...

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
  51. *Linus* isn't in anti-trust trouble with the EU... by Richard+Steiner · · Score: 1

    ...and he doesn't represent one of the major players in terms of patent issues, so the whole "conflict of interest" concern wouldn't be there.

    Context is important.

    The question is, can you point to the means by which the company in which Allen owns a lot of stock is going to have a "strangle hold" over the commission?

    Good question. How did Microsoft manage to pull it off with the US Justice Department?

    --
    Mainframe/UNIX Bit Twiddler and long time Windows/Linux Hobbyist.
    The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.
  52. wrong! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    check out the list of shareholders:

    from Yahoo.

    1. Re:wrong! by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1

      Him or his holding company, what's the difference?

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    2. Re:wrong! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      His holding company, Vulcan Holdings, does not show up in a list of the largest shareholders either.

      You're simply full of crap.

  53. Nah. That's just the Merkin spelling. :-) by Richard+Steiner · · Score: 1

    Hey -- it could be! :-)

    --
    Mainframe/UNIX Bit Twiddler and long time Windows/Linux Hobbyist.
    The Theorem Theorem: If If, Then Then.
  54. "Mandelson and Mortgage Fraud" by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 0


    More about Mandelson's activities: See "Mandelson and Mortgage Fraud", for example.

  55. Return of the Spin Doctor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Information for non UK readers.

    This could be considered off-topic but it looks at the Machiavellian [Niccolò Machiavelli] practice closely associated with Mandelson and the party he serves (UK Labour Party), that of being a spin doctor.

    The term spin doctor could be interpreted politely as one who is "responsible for ensuring that others interpret an event from a particular point of view." But the term has grown to cover many dirty tricks.

    Now I know that the link between Paul Allen and Microsoft today is at best tenuous, but one does smile over the dreamed of connection between the UK's once King of Spin and the dastardly Microsoft.

    Now witness a spin doctor, attached to the same party as Mandelson, in action. This is taken from Britain's Independent newspaper. It has a delicious ending.


    While others watched the horrific television pictures from New York and Washington on 11 September last year [2001], Jo Moore, personal spin doctor to the Transport Secretary, Stephen Byers, sent an email saying that it would be a good day to "bury bad news". Obviously, it did not occur to her that emails can be stored on computers - and passed on to journalists. Ms Moore lost her job.


    Spin is dreadful practise and sadly its not confined to Politics. For those wishing to pursue further reading on the matter check out SpinWatch

    Note to the Slashdot staff. You should ask for readers to write in sometime of their experiences of spin in the companies they work for. Should make for some enlightening reading on a Friday afternoon or a Monday morning for that matter.

  56. World's Largest Privately Owned Yacht by LanMan04 · · Score: 1

    From the PowerPoint presentation:

    "In 2003, the launch of Paul Allen's 127m (416ft) "Octopus" secured its number one position as the world's largest yacht.

    Microsoft's "accidental billionaire" Paul Allen - worth US$20 billion according to Forbes, the third richest man in America and 7th in the world - owns two other monsters yachts such as Tatoosh ranked 3rd in the World in 2003.

    Octopus cost Allen over US$200 million and has Permanent crew of 60, including several former Navy Seals. It has two helicopters, seven boats, a 10 man submarine and a remote controlled vehicle for crawling on the Ocean floor. The submarine has the capacity to sleep eight for up to two weeks underwater.

    On average, owners must spend a minimum of 10 percent of the purchase price every year to keep these yachts in good working condition and cover crew salaries. Therefore "Octopus" which cost Allen US$200 million requires a US$20 million annual budget."

    Dude, an 8 man submarine that can stay underwater for two weeks? Holy fucking shit on a stick.

    --
    With the first link, the chain is forged.
  57. Famously closeted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mandelson is also famously closeted, and he has a strange power over the media that once made discussion of his sexuality off-limits on every newspaper and TV channel --- even when it directly affects his job, as happened when he was Northern Ireland secretary and some of the more bigoted terrorist factions refused to deal with him.

    There was a hilarious moment when another gay MP accidentally outed him on live TV. The normally very aggressive interviewer was speechless, and wrote Mandy a personal note of apology.

  58. Sack 'em both! by Bad+Boy+Marty · · Score: 2, Informative

    Apparently, neither one of them can obey laws, though both serve to influence their creation. Seems quite the abuse of power to me.

    --
    RHCE; are you certified? Karma: ambiguous.
  59. The post said MOD flamebait not troll. by TapeCutter · · Score: 1

    Yes the US is very good at instiutionalized corruption and so is the Old World. To see what fully implemented corruption can really achive take a trip to Africa.

    One man's troll and all that.

    --
    And did you exchange a walk on part in the war for a lead role in a cage? - Pink Floyd.