Slashdot Mirror


Mac mini's New Friend

Thijs van As writes "The miniMate, MicroNet's new external disk drive and port replicator, is created specifically to complement Apple's new Mac mini. With available storage up to 400GB, 4 USB 2.0 ports and 3 FireWire ports, the miniMate extends the capabilities of the Mac mini. Looks impressive if you ask me."

142 comments

  1. Cute by MindStalker · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Cute, but can you also connect it to a PC given the right formatting?

    1. Re:Cute by RautenkranzMT · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's a firewire hard drive. One could assume you can format it however you want.

      --
      The cow goes "tink"
    2. Re:Cute by MindStalker · · Score: 1

      Yea, I pretty much assumed this, I was more suprised this wasn't mentioned in their FAQ. It gives the impression that this is Mac only.

    3. Re:Cute by greed · · Score: 1
      It's priced so that PC users wouldn't buy one.

      Heck, I'm running bog-standard FireWire enclosures from the local PC discount shops on my Macs, so I probably wouldn't buy one either. I have started getting USB+FireWire cages, so they will work with anything... even if it has to be at USB 1.1 speeds.

      This does remind me of the old SCSI drives that were in enclosures perfectly sized to fit underneath the original All-In-One Macs.

    4. Re:Cute by Moofie · · Score: 1, Troll

      Yeah, they put the specifications on the specs page. Wonder what they were thinking?

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    5. Re:Cute by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. To a PC as well as to most recent Macs as long as it's a computer that has the interface (FireWire, USB, or both) you want to replicate.

      But be warned: Especially when you connect it to a PC, don't expect a perfect match in terms of aesthetics ;-)

  2. 3 Firewire and 4 USB ports? by theWrkncacnter · · Score: 5, Informative

    That's slightly misleading, since you have to use one of each of those to connect the unit to the mac mini and use those ports as a hub. Still seems pretty neat though. 2 firewire ports can be very handy.

    --
    -1 (Troll) is antihammer
    1. Re: 3 Firewire and 4 USB ports? by gidds · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So the unit has 3 FireWire ports, of which one has to be connected to the Mac; leaving two. But don't you also lose one of the Mac's own ports too, at the other end of the cable? So the net gain is only one extra port available?

      --

      Ceterum censeo subscriptionem esse delendam.

    2. Re: 3 Firewire and 4 USB ports? by JeffTL · · Score: 1

      It's sacrificing one port for two....and an external hard drive that would usually take up another port, so it's like getting three for one, i.e. a +2 gain when you count the hard drive as a device.

    3. Re: 3 Firewire and 4 USB ports? by blackmonday · · Score: 1

      You're right, of course. It's not really a big issue though. Most firewire devices also have an extra port for pass-through. The only FW device I have without a pass through is my DV camera. Even with a single FW port on my powerbook, I still have an external drive, external DVD burner, and DV cam - all hooked up and running at the same time.

    4. Re: 3 Firewire and 4 USB ports? by gidds · · Score: 1

      Oh. I only use two FireWire devices -- my iPod dock, and a CF reader -- and neither have pass-through. OTOH, I used to have a CD writer, which did have it, so maybe I've just been unlucky in that respect.

      --

      Ceterum censeo subscriptionem esse delendam.

    5. Re: 3 Firewire and 4 USB ports? by WaKall · · Score: 1

      Yes, but you are using one logically - you've got the HD connected through the cable to the Mini. So, it's like daisy-chaining.

  3. crappy cable options ... by torpor · · Score: 5, Insightful

    .. they went to all that work to make an extender box for the mac mini, and ship 'standard' firewire/usb cables .. 7" and 9" long, respectively.

    pfft. if they were a real Apple accessory company, this box'd have its own little, short, 'smart'-looking cables which are neat enough, and only long enough, to stretch from mac mini port to hub port.

    niggly point, but a point nevertheless. if i'm going to buy one of these things for my mac mini, i want it to be -neat- and not end up promoting ratsnest cable propagation ..

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    1. Re:crappy cable options ... by Zemrec · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I was thinking the same thing.

      I wonder how long it'll be until somebody offers a replacement case for the Mini thats big enough to accommodate a desktop size hard drive and maybe even an optical drive too (so you can utilize cheaper and faster, albeit noisier, 3.5" and 5.25" drives.) It won't be as mini as the Mini itself, but it might be cool! Heck, if they make it roomy enough, maybe it could fit the Mini's power brick inside too.

    2. Re:crappy cable options ... by arloguthrie · · Score: 2, Informative

      Like this?

      A kit that does exactly that would be great, like the Marathon kits, like the iRack. Sure, it's warranty-violating activity, but when has that stopped anybody?

      --
      ----------
      Cheese it! It's the FEDS!
    3. Re:crappy cable options ... by Zemrec · · Score: 1

      Yuck! Ugly.

      I was thinking more along the lines of a case that matches the Mini's, but just taller so it can take bigger drives inside. May as well throw in additional FW and USB ports too.

    4. Re:crappy cable options ... by arloguthrie · · Score: 1

      Oh, I agree, it's hideous. Just wanted to point out that someone with a lot of time on their hands had the idea.

      --
      ----------
      Cheese it! It's the FEDS!
    5. Re:crappy cable options ... by arloguthrie · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is a little prettier. Still not the Mac mini style you want, but at least its kitschy.

      --
      ----------
      Cheese it! It's the FEDS!
    6. Re:crappy cable options ... by TheShmoe · · Score: 1

      I would assume that in order to get up to 400gb capacity this drive must be a 3.5"

    7. Re:crappy cable options ... by UWC · · Score: 1

      Interestingly, he bought his 2.5"-3.5" IDE adapter from the guy you initially linked.

    8. Re:crappy cable options ... by bjohnson · · Score: 1

      AAAAAuuuuuugggggghhhhhh! That EVIL EVIL centris case.

      They put the power switch right where the flopy eject button would go. Since this was sold as a Mac/DOS hybrid in lots of places *lots* of people learned quickly that Macs crashed when you ejected floppies ;-)

      You would be a lot better off getting an LC case instead, smaller, just as expandable. http://www.greenpeanut.com/galleries/electronics/e lectronics-Images/6.jpg

      It'll take a little more Dremel-fu to set up the slotload optical drive to work properly, though.

    9. Re:crappy cable options ... by Digital+Pizza · · Score: 1

      The guy really should have put a USB floppy drive behind the floppy slot to make the illusion complete :)

      --
      We apologize for the inconvenience.
    10. Re:crappy cable options ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a bit overkill on the drive cooling too.

    11. Re:crappy cable options ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, you people will bitch about EVERYTHING. Get some fucking cable ties then.

    12. Re:crappy cable options ... by MidnightBrewer · · Score: 1

      The cable length would be to accomodate those people connecting this to computers other than a Mac mini. That, and it saves on higher production costs that would end up severely limiting their potential market.

      --
      "Give a man fire, and he'll be warm for a day; set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life
    13. Re:crappy cable options ... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Exactly. Note also the position of the ports. If this device had been designed by someone with a brain, the second FireWire port from the right would have been the USB-upstream port. They would then have included a rigid clip that connected the two ports on the Mini to the two on the Mate, eliminating the needs for cables. Ideally, they would have also provided a similar solution for power to the Mac Mini (as a take-off from this device's PSU), so it didn't need any extra cables at all.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    14. Re:crappy cable options ... by highbrow · · Score: 1

      oh cmon, the cables are 7 and 9 *inches* long. That's soooo gonna add to the rats nest out back.

      Perhaps you mistook " for ' ?

      rigid clips are great if the relative positions of the mini and the mate are fixed, but what if you want to put the mate next to, rather than on top of, the mini?

    15. Re:crappy cable options ... by node+3 · · Score: 1

      and ship 'standard' firewire/usb cables .. 7" and 9" long, respectively.

      I've *never* seen 7" or 9" USB/FireWire cables, ever. I'm sure they exist, but I wouldn't call them "standard". Standard is something like 2m and .5m.

      pfft. if they were a real Apple accessory company, this box'd have its own little, short, 'smart'-looking cables which are neat enough, and only long enough, to stretch from mac mini port to hub port.

      Which is fine, until the first time you try to pick up your Mac mini and you find your ports being stressed, the HD jolted, and that you *can't* do whatever it is you were moving your Mac mini for in the first place (sometimes you just want to move it a few inches to run a cable, or access a port, whatever).

      I think 7-9" is about the perfect cable length for this sort of thing.

    16. Re:crappy cable options ... by Saint+Fnordius · · Score: 1

      It is pretty telling that all of the photos they show have no cables attached. Not even the Mac mini power and monitor cable.

      It would be neat if they had positioned the ports right under the expected Mac mini hookups, then made a special bridge adapter. It might also be a good idea for the next version to put one or two of the Firewire/USB ports on the front of the box for digital cameras.

      Oh well. It's pretty good, but I wouldn't call it great...

    17. Re:crappy cable options ... by torpor · · Score: 1

      the distance between ports when the hub and the mini are on top of each other, is far less than 7 inches. far less than 9.

      designing it so it can be placed next to the mini is ludicrous. stacking is the only way to go with the mini!

      it just seems to me they chintzed out. give me cable/port arrangements that make things neater, not messier!

      its an apple for cryin' out loud!

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    18. Re:crappy cable options ... by torpor · · Score: 1

      I've *never* seen 7" or 9" USB/FireWire cables, ever. I'm sure they exist, but I wouldn't call them "standard". Standard is something like 2m and .5m.

      i've got two of them, right here, standard stock local mediamarkt purchase ... maybe you live in the boondocks?

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  4. Imagine... by lowmagnet · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A daisy-chain of these! (note: not a beowulf cluster) It would be similar to a Navi brick system. I still want some sort of expandable bus standard. It sure would be great to add a video card by pluggin in an expansion brick. Unfortunately the RFI involved in external cables and the shielding required make this difficult.

    --
    Heute die Welt, morgen das Sonnensystem!
  5. -1, NOT FUNNY! by Montreal · · Score: 0

    Just a warning to anybody who's thinking about posting any "Their website must be hosted on a mini" comments ...

  6. PC Jr by beatdown · · Score: 0

    Reminds me of the PC Jr. extensions.

    1. Re:PC Jr by BancBoy · · Score: 1

      That's exactly what I thought when I saw it the first time. Thankfully my Mini makes redundant my Speech sidecar and my 768KB (736K usable) hacked Microsoft memory sidecar. No need for my Cluster network sidecar or parallel printer port sidecar. But what do I do with all these 3 1/4" mini floppy discs from the dual mini drive expansion module? What a bizarre little disc format those were. I think I saw them on music synthesizers at one point in the 80s. And here I am on a Mini with a wireless keyboard... 20 years later (shudder). The more things change... Mac Mini, the Banana Junior for the 21st Century!

      --
      [UID-HeinzIntel]
  7. Pricing by telbij · · Score: 4, Informative

    From the website:

    MM80 $149.00
    MM160 $179.00
    MM250 $249.00
    MM400 $499.00


    As much as I like the form factor I would have a real hard time buying one of these, but if I did it would have to be the 250. Can you stack 'em and get an extra 100GB + twice the ports for $500?

    1. Re:Pricing by Zemrec · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have a problem with those prices too.

      I just bought a Mini 9 days ago, and wanted an external firewire drive too. None of the locally available stores sold bare FW enclosures, and their prices on pre-installed ones were ridiculous.

      I was able to pick up a bare 250 GB, 7200 RPM, 8 MB cache Maxtor drive for $107.50 (clearance at Staples) and then had to order a bare enclosure at Newegg ($31). Saved a bundle going that route, although the bay admittedly doesn't look as cool as this one.

      Too bad they specifically say they don't sell them without hard drives installed.

    2. Re:Pricing by nine-times · · Score: 1
      As much as I like the form factor I would have a real hard time buying one of these, but if I did it would have to be the 250. Can you stack 'em and get an extra 100GB + twice the ports for $500?

      I don't see why not. The Mac mini has 1 firewire + 2USB ports. Assuming 1 USB port is used for keyboard/mouse, that means you can connect 2 directly to your Mac mini. Additionally, each of these "Mini Mates" has 2 extra firewire ports and 3 extra USB ports, so I don't see any reason why you couldn't chain them.

      What I'm suggesting is, you should be able to attach quite a few of these to one mini if you chose.

    3. Re:Pricing by greed · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Yup; there is a limit to the number of hubs you can have in either a USB or a FireWire chain, so you'd want to connect, say, 1 Mini Mate right to the computer, then 2 more Mini Mates to the first Mini Mate.

      Now, for even more fun, don't worry so much about the ports, and have a chain of USB-only Mini Mates, and a second chain of FireWire-only Mini Mates.

      Each FireWire-only Mini Mate can have two further Mini Mates plugged into it, up to the FireWire hub limit.

      And each USB-only Mini Mate can have three further Mini Mates plugged into it, up to the USB 2.0 hub limit.

      Say you go 3 levels deep on each; so you'll have 27 open USB 2.0 ports (not counting the second one on the Mini itself), 8 open FireWire ports, and a total of 20 Mini Mates... giving you 1.6 TB to 8.0 TB of additional storage. (This was a bit more than I can count on my fingers, so I could be off a bit....)

      If you really want a bunch of FireWire or USB ports, you might want to think about just getting one or two Mini Mates and a couple of hubs...

    4. Re:Pricing by spectral · · Score: 1

      firewire can be chained, as well. So plug in one mini mate, and from that plug in one or two more, etc.. :) I think there's a limit of 8 devices per firewire chain.. not sure on that though.

      (Note: you need to connect both to get the hub functionality of that protocol, but only one if you want the HD and/or only one protocol. So, if you only care about USB, hook up only USB. Might as well hook up firewire as well since it's probably better for high speed HD's, and even if it's not (it's debateable), if all you wanted was USB, then now you have more USB bandwidth because the HD is going over firewire.)

    5. Re:Pricing by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      Imagine everytime a Dell Dimension comes out with a new version with higher capacity becomes slashdot news. This is NOT news.

    6. Re:Pricing by Mattintosh · · Score: 2, Informative

      Firewire has a limit of 63 devices(additional devices... the computer would be a 64th device) per bus. USB has a limit of 127, not including the host controller (the computer, which would make the total 128).

    7. Re:Pricing by argent · · Score: 1

      And then you can make a Beowulf cluster of them!

      Whoops, wrong thread.

    8. Re:Pricing by krakelohm · · Score: 1

      And what does this have to do with a hub/external HD??

      --
      You are all a bunch of idots.
    9. Re:Pricing by spectral · · Score: 1

      I realize the topic's likely dead, but could you clarify if this is correct, if you read this:

      USB has a global limit of 127. Firewire has a limit of 63 per bus. That is.. you can daisy chain 63 firewire devices, if you had two firewire ports on your computer, depending on how it was setup internally, ou could have 126 devices.

      USB, however, does not support daisy chaining.. each hub will NOT support 127 devices, as far as I know?

    10. Re:Pricing by Mattintosh · · Score: 1

      Your post is mostly correct. The only thing wrong is that USB does not have a global limit of 127 devices. Each bus supports that many devices.

      On Apple systems, there are 2 USB ports on the back of the machine, and they're both on the same bus. Hooked into those two ports (via lots and lots of hubs), you can have 127 devices (numbered internally as 1 to 127, the computer would be device 0, so there is technically a total of 128 devices).

      On PC's, USB ports are usually more plentiful. They generally come in pairs. I know for a fact that my PC motherboard has 3 USB busses on it. 2 busses (4 ports) on the back, and a separate bus (2 ports) for the front. Each bus can support 127 external devices, for a total of 381 USB devices.

      Firewire, on the other hand, is generally given one bus per port on a computer. A PCI card that has 3 Firewire ports will generally have 3 separate bus controllers. An Apple system with 2 Firewire ports has 2 bus controllers (always!). Each controller can handle 63 other devices attached to it. If you install one of those fancy 5-port PCI Firewire cards, you'll get 5 busses, each capable of handling 63 external devices, for a total of 315 Firewire devices.

      Neither system truly supports "daisy-chaining", since they both rely on a bus topology. Daisy-chaining requires every device to have two transmitter/receivers, and each port(and its respective transceiver) can only be connected to one other device. Firewire and USB use bus "backbones" to connect multiple devices to each other on a common wire. They use switching and collision detection/avoidance to keep things sane (like Ethernet does).

      Firewire can support something that appears to be daisy-chaining. Since Firewire is a point-to-point communication system, any device can have a second (or third, or more) bus connection and can propagate signals from one bus to another. This setup would qualify as daisy-chaining, but it could be abused to make chains of busses instead of chains of devices, so it's close, but not quite the same.

      USB, on the other hand, is more of a master/slave setup. It requires a "host controller" (UHCI = Universal Host Controller Interface, OHCI = Open H.C.I.) to keep things running. Any device may not talk to any other device. They can only talk to the host controller. They can, however, request the host controller to pass a message to another device. USB won't support anything that even resembles daisy-chaining.

  8. cute-oh! by splatterboy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Kawaiiiii! Guess I know what the girlfriend is going to want for her birthday... sigh. The new 15" Pbook finds yet another obstacle.

    Geek girlfriends kill you one accessory at a time.

    --
    "Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts." ~The Honorable Daniel Patrick Moynihan
    1. Re:cute-oh! by MyDixieWrecked · · Score: 1

      Kawaiiiii!

      especially the japanese speaking types!

      --



      ...spike
      Ewwwwww, coconut...
    2. Re:cute-oh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      japanese isn't cool any more. it's not 1985. now chinese and arabic are cool. it goes with the whole hate-america vibe.

  9. Pretty sweet, but... by sootman · · Score: 1

    This is almost what I want. After using my Mini for a while I decided I wanted a base that had front and rear USB and FW ports and a headphone jack front and rear. Not that I need to use a million devices at once but it'd be nice to just leave things plugged in.

    The mini has two USB and one FireWire port and I have a DV camera (FW), a DV bridge (FW), an external HD (FW), an iPod (FW), keyboard (USB), USB hub built into my monitor (USB), and a card reader (USB) for my digital camera. Messing with the closely-spaced ports on the back of the Mini is one of the few downsides of the machine.

    --
    Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    1. Re:Pretty sweet, but... by Zemrec · · Score: 1

      I just use a self-powered USB hub connected to my KVM so I can share all my USB devices with all my computers. Although of course only the currently switched comp can use them.

      As for FW, I only need it for the Mini, and I have my new external drivebay connected to it, and my iPod chained off of that.

      Interestingly, when I turn the drivebay off, the iPod will still charge but it won't be seen by the Mac.

    2. Re:Pretty sweet, but... by base_chakra · · Score: 1

      Yeah, in my view it misses the mark. The Mini is very compact; adding a hub for a couple of buses shouldn't double its size and cost nearly as much as the Mini itself.

      What the Mini really needs add-ons can't provide: a FASTER external bus type (FireWire800), not more ports. I like the Mini, but I just don't understand why Apple saddled a machine designed for external expansion with FireWire400. Unfortunately, USB 2.0 is woefully inadequate for mass storage.

    3. Re:Pretty sweet, but... by b17bmbr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What the Mini really needs add-ons can't provide: a FASTER external bus type (FireWire800), not more ports. I like the Mini, but I just don't understand why Apple saddled a machine designed for external expansion with FireWire400. Unfortunately, USB 2.0 is woefully inadequate for mass storage.

      they did this because they don't figure people are going to do any of that. they did this to compete with low priced pc's. my guess is that many mac mini purchases will be replacing pc's. my dad bought an emac only beacuse he wanted replace his 5 year old imac, and didn't want to buy a monitor too. if you have a montitor, then "switching" is easy. it'll also work great as a second mac at home, something to ssh/vnc into. remember, it has a laptop hard drive, so it's not a power machine. if you need that, you'll buy an imac, or power mac. people who buy minis won't need FW800 and people who need FW800 won't buy minis. it's the ibook/powerbook difference.

      --
      My problem? I was perfectly gruntled, until some numbnuts came by and dissed me.
    4. Re:Pretty sweet, but... by sootman · · Score: 1

      Here's what I really want:

      Back:
      FireWire, USB, and 1/8" stereo miniplug inputs
      2 FireWire, 2-4 USB, and one 1/8" audio output
      - for permanent devices: DV bridge, FW HD, keyboard, stereo, etc.

      Front:
      same ports as back for portable devices: headphones, iPod, DV cam, CF card reader, etc.

      Optional:
      - hard drive
      - firewire-to-5.1 audio (like what griffin makes)

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    5. Re:Pretty sweet, but... by Moofie · · Score: 1

      "ibook/powerbook difference"

      I disagree with you on that point. I've got a 12" Powerbook that I bought about six months ago. Were I buying a machine today, it would probably be a 12" iBook. The only substantial difference is a) lack of a superdrive and b) no video mirroring (which seems to be hack-able).

      The G4 iBook is a hell of a good value. I got a great deal on my Powerbook, but I'm not sure it was THAT great of a deal. I'll find out for sure when my gf's iBook gets here in, oh, twelve hours or so.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    6. Re:Pretty sweet, but... by b17bmbr · · Score: 1

      regarding the 12", i agree. i was going to buy a 12" pb, but got a 12" g4 ibook instead. though i must admit, for most things, my g3/700mhz ibook is still an awesome machine now that it has 640MB ram and panther. anyways, i'm not quite sure apple's thinking regarding the 12" laptops. i was more or less referring to the 15/17" PB's. for me, there is not going to be a difference. i don't work on sizable enough java projects, and most of my work, other than school crap, is php/mysql stuff. although i could use video mirroring, the ibooks can be had with a super drive. there is one other difference, and that's quality of hardware. i swear my g3 is a helluva lot more durable than the g4. you play with a g3 white ibook, it's really solid. the g4 feels alot more flimsy. of course the g3 cost $1500, the g4 $999. that's gotta come from somewhere!!!

      --
      My problem? I was perfectly gruntled, until some numbnuts came by and dissed me.
  10. Trademark infringement? by stereotree · · Score: 5, Interesting
    As a law student, I see this in terms of how Apple's legal dept. might view this new "accessory" as infringing on their trademark in the Mac mini.

    Apple might have a case that the MiniMate infringes on the trademark it has established with the Mac mini on the grounds that it has copied its trade dress.

    Looking at the front of the machine, there are no markings on the Mac mini to let you know that it is an Apple product, whereas Micronet is emblazoned on the front of its MiniMate. If the Mac Mini is covered on top by the MiniMate or the pair are stacked in a rack/cabinet/cubbyhole, one might think that both boxes are made by Micronet, effectively causing a likelihood of confusion "or to deceive as to the...origin...of the goods." (this last language is taken straight out of Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act.)

    I know most /.'ers won't have this problem of confusion but I believe that the standard is according to some "reasonable person of the community" standard, and whether they would be confused by the trade dress...

    I think Apple went after a Chinese (or Taiwanese?) company a few years ago for its bondi blue iMac lookalike....but they seem to have a more favorable view of add-ons like this one that resemble the original product without performing the same functions (the huge iPod accessory market is further proof of their leniency to accessories that piggy-back off their designs without directly competing with them).

    1. Re:Trademark infringement? by miller701 · · Score: 1
      I think Apple went after a Chinese (or Taiwanese?) company a few years ago for its bondi blue iMac lookalike....but they seem to have a more favorable view of add-ons like this one that resemble the original product without performing the same functions (the huge iPod accessory market is further proof of their leniency to accessories that piggy-back off their designs without directly competing with them).

      As you say, Apple shouldn't have any problem with this. I'd rather they spend time putting more goodness into the OS and H/W than coming up with accessories than this.

    2. Re:Trademark infringement? by peragrin · · Score: 5, Interesting

      What your forgetting is that Apple promotes third party additions. With the special requirements of the Apple crowd(style, form, function, design) third party toys are a tough sell.

      Take a good look around ipod accessories. Heck even Radio Shack has them now. With such a name they probably didn't get Apple's approval, but if it match's Apple style closely enough Apple doesn't care.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    3. Re:Trademark infringement? by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1
      I think Apple went after a Chinese (or Taiwanese?) company a few years ago for its bondi blue iMac lookalike.

      Apple went after two companies. One of them was e-Machine. In those cases, the look-a-likes were actually Intel PCs. In this case, Apple may simply ask Micronet to change their design a little more to distinguish it. But I agree with you that they probably won't stop it from being sold.

      --
      Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
    4. Re:Trademark infringement? by BabyPanther · · Score: 1
      This isn't a computer. It is an accessory.

      Every accessory manufacturer in the world wants their accessories to look like the machine they are making their accessory for. (Ok, at least the good ones.) If it was an actual computer, then sure. Sue the hell out of them -- particularly if it is a Windows PC. If it could only run Linux then as a proper Slashdotter, I would be required to say that Apple machines should come pre-installed with Linux anyway and it Apple's fault.

      If I make an aquarium that looks like a Mac, could I be sued?

    5. Re:Trademark infringement? by Digital+Pizza · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Are you kidding? This isn't a computer, it's a peripheral. It doesn't compete with the Mini, it enhances it, and if anything it would increase sales of the Mini. In fact, the design and limited number of ports of the Mini scream "accessorize me", and I'm sure Apple did that on purpose in order to create a new market. Apple loves these kind of add-ons.

      You'll do great as a lawyer, just stay out of marketing :-)

      --
      We apologize for the inconvenience.
    6. Re:Trademark infringement? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope - third year law student here (and super fun lovin' geek)

      You would have a case of trademark infringment if the minimate was a competing product substantially similar to the mac mini as to cause confusion to aa reasonable person. this is not the case. it is not an "alternative" to the mac mini, but rather a complimentary product.

      the mini mate, in fact, could be said to promote the mac mini.

      now, if the mini-mate had its own CPU and an OS, then there would be a problem.

    7. Re:Trademark infringement? by stereotree · · Score: 1
      haha. This is a great response.

      But I think my point is that when the peripheral might look TOO much like the original product and cause confusion over who actually produced the COMPUTER then the legal heads might have to get involved...

      Your point is well taken though - perhaps Apple really does love to create markets for add-ons. But there are some accessories I've seen that Steve Jobs must cringe at.... (The wood block iPod dock (er, stand?) comes to mind)

    8. Re:Trademark infringement? by Digital+Pizza · · Score: 1
      I dunno, it seems pretty clear that this peripheral is made for the Mac Mini, and everyone who would buy such a thing is sure to know who makes the Mini.

      The wood block iPod dock (er, stand?) comes to mind

      LOL! Are you talking about this? That is pretty funny - looks like something out of wood shop.

      There certainly are a lot of crap accessories out there, but on the bright side, it's indicative of a healthy market.

      --
      We apologize for the inconvenience.
    9. Re:Trademark infringement? by stereotree · · Score: 1
      The wood block iPod dock (er, stand?) comes to mind

      LOL! Are you talking about this? That is pretty funny - looks like something out of wood shop.

      actually I was thinking of another wood iPod dock, but it now seems to be eluding google.

      Check these out, they're probably the worst...

    10. Re:Trademark infringement? by Digital+Pizza · · Score: 1

      Great - someone has succeeded in making the iPod look like a stack of business cards. :-)

      --
      We apologize for the inconvenience.
    11. Re:Trademark infringement? by damsa · · Score: 3, Informative

      The shape of the hard drive accessory is functional as it reduces the foot print of the hard drive to match the same shape as the mini mac. Trade dress cannot be functional. Coca Cola bottles can be trade dress because the shape of the bottle is not functional and the coca cola shape is a distinctive shape. A rectangular shaped hard drive enclosure does not in itself show that Apple made it as hard drives were often enclosed in rectangular boxes. There aren't that many alternatives. Some companies have trade dress for color like UPS has for brown. But it's unlikely that Apple can claim white as trade dress, as white is used by other companies in their computer products.

    12. Re:Trademark infringement? by child_of_mercy · · Score: 1

      I recall seeing some stress testing showing the shape of the coke botle actually makes it stronger than conventional bottle shapes. Not a minor consideration when selling a product, at pressure, in glass, to the public.

      So there is some function there too (or at least was in the days before cheap plastic bottles).

      --
      'There is a Light that never goes out.'
    13. Re:Trademark infringement? by Blapto · · Score: 1

      Perhaps I'm being a tad thick, but are those iPods levitating?

  11. Missing Digital Audio In/Out by j0kkk3l · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They really should have included an USB Sounddevice with optical Audio in and out and an analog Audio in. That's really missing.
    Otherwise, this is an expected product.

    1. Re:Missing Digital Audio In/Out by booch · · Score: 1

      Exactly. While this is a nice addition, it's not the add-on I'm most interested in. (It's just a hub and a hard drive.) I'm using my mini as an HDTV receiver (with EyeTV 500) and DVD player, and the thing I'm really missing on my Mac mini is 5.1 audio. I'd love to get 5.1 digital AND analog output, and digital and analog input. (I think such external sound cards exist, they're just a bit pricey, and not quite what I'm looking for.)

      Also, I'd rather have a better form-factor than just stacking the thing below my Mac mini. (I already have my EyeTV stacked below it, even though they are different sizes.) I'd much rather have the whole system in a more stereo-component form factor than an SFF Shuttle PC form.

      --
      Software sucks. Open Source sucks less.
    2. Re:Missing Digital Audio In/Out by mmkkbb · · Score: 1

      how's this?. No digital in or out, unfortunately

      --
      -mkb
    3. Re:Missing Digital Audio In/Out by DiscoOnTheSide · · Score: 1

      sound blaster live! usb. surround sound, optical, $50. hardly pricey.

      --
      Viva La Revolucion! Buy a Mac!
    4. Re:Missing Digital Audio In/Out by booch · · Score: 1

      Hmm. The Audigy 2 NX or Extigy would be great, but the Creative site doesn't mention any Mac support. (Nor for the Live! external you mentioned.) I'll look into them though. Thanks for the idea.

      Looks like there's a commercial driver, but at $60, that's a lot of money compared to the price of the hardware. According to Apple, Core Audio (at least in Tiger) will support "most" USB and FireWire devices without extra software.

      --
      Software sucks. Open Source sucks less.
  12. Mildly OT, since no one else has said it yet ... by David+Rolfe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Isn't this just an outright advertisement posing as News for Nerds? You think I could get an 'article' into slashdot if it was just touting a 30% sale at DealRam or Newegg or something?

    The only time I would think a product like this was news was if the price was stupidly low. Like ... "new external firewire drive that stacks perfectly with Mini, 3 additional USB2, 2 additional Firewire 400, 250 GB for $99!" Maybe with some more exclamation points so it looks really news-like.

    Sorry for the rant. Glad to see there have been so few dupes (possibly none?!) in the last two weeks. :-)

    --
    Read Heinlein's 1953 Revolt in 2100, now more than ever.
  13. Retro by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's only misleading if you don't assume it has to attach to the Mac somehow. It doesn't claim to be a Bluetooth or WiFi network-attached hard drive. Also, one of the USB ports is a USB B port, so that one could only be used one way: to attach to the computer.

    But then they could have designed a proprietary harness port and a special cable with a connector for that port on one end and USB and Firewire on the other if you'd preferred. It would raise the price though.

    I like how its under-the-computer design resembles Mac hard drives of old.

    But someone's going to have to get one, open it up, and see if it is possible to swap in normal internal drives and what type of drive it uses, e.g. serial or parallel ATA, desktop or laptop.

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
    1. Re:Retro by mmkkbb · · Score: 1

      I like how its under-the-computer design resembles Mac hard drives of old.

      And Mac printers of old. The LaserWriter II was designed to look nice sitting atop a Mac II (or IIx or IIfx)

      --
      -mkb
    2. Re:Retro by UWC · · Score: 1

      Since they're offering a 7200rpm 250GB drive+enclosure+hubs for $250, I'm going to assume the drives are 3.5" desktop type drives. I don't think they mention EIDE or SATA, but I would imagine that, since the USB or Firewire connection will probably be the speed bottleneck, the drives are probably the cheaper parallel type instead of serial.

    3. Re:Retro by guet · · Score: 1

      Now all we need is someone to build a retro looking top part to sit on top of it with a portrait LCD inside that the mini slides into. Perhaps it could have a handle on top, and we'd have a mac classic. Actually not a bad idea for people who just need it for typing.

  14. Good idea, but.... by mblase · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...they messed up on one thing. The majority of the USB and FireWire ports should be in the FRONT of the box, not behind it. If you're going to market your hardware as a port expander, the least you should do is make those ports easier to access than the ones already on the CPU box.

    1. Re:Good idea, but.... by mmkkbb · · Score: 1

      So mount it backwards.

      --
      -mkb
    2. Re:Good idea, but.... by mblase · · Score: 1

      So mount it backwards.

      You skillfully missed the point. Usability-wise, it would make sense to have the power cable and the USB or FireWire cable that connects to the CPU in the back, and the rest of the ports in the front.

    3. Re:Good idea, but.... by silicon+not+in+the+v · · Score: 2, Insightful
      So mount it backwards.

      You skillfully missed the point. Usability-wise, it would make sense to have the power cable and the USB or FireWire cable that connects to the CPU in the back, and the rest of the ports in the front.
      Well, yes and no. Remember that most of the appeal of this as well as for the Mac Mini itself is about the aesthetics. Many people would probably want the flat clean front of the device that wouldn't be showing a bunch of ports and sockets. For those who aren't as concerned with the clean appearance and want the ports on the front with the requisite cables and such showing on the front, they probably wouldn't mind turning it that way and having the power cord run around to the back.

      With this configuration, at least people can choose if they want the pretty form or the practical form.
      --
      We may experience some slight turbulence and then...explode. -Capt. Mal Reynolds
    4. Re:Good idea, but.... by supabeast! · · Score: 1

      Right on the mark. They need to find the idiot designer who decided that putting the logo on the front was more important than putting the hot-swappable device ports on the front and fire his ass.

      Won't it be a great day when the entire industry realizes that aside from power and network stuff, cables that stick out perpendicular to the back of the machine are just a pain in the ass?

  15. Re:Mildly OT, since no one else has said it yet .. by Golias · · Score: 5, Funny

    User #38 and this is the first time you've noticed a blatant Slashvertizement?

    Are you a new user who bought this account from somebody else, or have you simply not been paying any attention?

    --

    Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  16. Performance bonus by oboylet · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Since you're getting a 7200 RPM drive you can really get around the Mini's biggest performance headache other than the 256 MB of ram -- its slow-ass laptop drive.

    Mac OS X can boot from any FW HD, so connect your mammoth HD using Firewire, use http://http//www.bombich.com/software/ccc.html Carbon Copy Cloner to move your System folder over, and watch your Mini guzzle NOX.

    Also, its a shame that they don't offer a bare-bones setup with no HD. I'd rather just pull the 160 giger out of my windows box and have the mini take over file serving. Alas.

    It's also worth asking if the pricing makes a lot of sense. Pay $500 for the mini, then another $99 for a ram upgrade, plus $150 or so for the hub. As cool as it is, it's not the most economical venture. And I'm taking for granted a spare USB Keyboard and mouse.

  17. Fixed link ... DOH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Some day I'll learn to use Preview!


    Here it is: http://www.bombich.com/software/ccc.html CCC

  18. I think they should include a KVM. by jrifkin · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think what the Mac Mini really needs is a KVM ability.

    It would be great if I could plop a new MacMini next to my existing PC, plug my current Keyboard,Video,Mouse in the MacMini, and then connect the MacMini to my existing PC. Then I could press the switch on the MacMini and toggle between the two machines.

    I could then have the best of my old and new systems at the same time.

    1. Re:I think they should include a KVM. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      So then everyone who doesn't need that KVM ability still has to pay for it? Great idea!

      If you're too cheap to buy a USB KVM and a couple cables (and you're running XP Pro), why don't you just set up your PC so you can operate it via RDC, and use the Mac RDC client? Then you can leave the Mac connected to your keyboard, mouse and video, and still use the PC normally. This would work perfectly for pretty much everything except gaming.

    2. Re:I think they should include a KVM. by PygmySurfer · · Score: 1

      This would work perfectly for pretty much everything except gaming.

      Isn't that the only reason for keeping the PC around? :)

  19. Yes by Kyusaku+Natsume · · Score: 5, Informative

    From their specs page:

    -OS Support : Mac OS X v10.1.5 & greater, Windows 98SE, 2000, ME, XP

    --
    Mexico: 100% conservative's America now!
  20. Re:Mildly OT, since no one else has said it yet .. by Kyusaku+Natsume · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Maybe you are right, but this is the first device I see that integrates an USB hub and a Firewire hub (to be honest, I didn't know that it could be done) in a external hard disk enclosure. I live in Mexico, the price for these things are:
    -USB hub: US$ 15 -38
    -160 HD: US$ 90-120
    -FireWire Hub: never seen one here
    -External HD enclosure: US$ 60-100

    Really, the price of this unit is low, if the quality of the enclosure is similar to the case of the Mac mini, then it is cheap.

    --
    Mexico: 100% conservative's America now!
  21. Re:Mildly OT, since no one else has said it yet .. by David+Rolfe · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Guess you didn't notice the caveat about how no one else has bitched yet.

    Of course it happens regularly, but you have to speak truth to power... You have to stand up and shout "damn you slashdot for posting an advertisement as news!"

    Additionally I'm not even that pissed about the 'ads as news' in and of itself... it's just stupid that it's not even like a newsworthy ad. It's just "ho hum, another external hard-drive that isn't worth it". A dollar per gig?! Even with a 10 dollars worth of USB/FW hubs? It's a fucking travesty. ('Course now I'll get 5 posts saying "it's a great value having those hubs and stuff built into something that costs 50% of the machine in the first place; I'll then have to retort, ad nauseam, about how "it leaves out some of the glaring oversights of the Mini itself, notably, a line in." Why are you going to spend that much money and not want the sockets on the front? )

    Anyway, if you were a subscriber you could see this surely isn't a purchased account, but it's more fun to troll, isn't it? Fortunately your comments usually add to a discussion, so we don't all have to write you off for this one lame post.

    Sorry to rant, I guess you asked for it.

    --
    Read Heinlein's 1953 Revolt in 2100, now more than ever.
  22. Re:Mildly OT, since no one else has said it yet .. by David+Rolfe · · Score: 1, Informative

    Well it's surely not cheap... because 15 (times 2) plus 90, plus 60 is $180 -- incidentally the price they are selling it for. So this assumes that the manufacturer couldn't get volume discounts or Asian fabrication to reduce costs AT ALL.

    Frankly, going with just the numbers you've given me, I'd say the unit could cost 15 to 20% less than it does. But screw them, let 'the market' decide. If people are willing to pay a dollar per gig just to have 5 extra ports on the back then let them. Just as I prognosticated in a previous post, I'll now have to mention that if they really wanted a killer app, something you would bare to stack your mini on (and to increase your expenditure by 20 to 50%), they would have included the ports the mini DOESN'T have: crappy old 1/8" line in, optical in/out, and then why not, a couple extra firewire sockets.

    Cheers.

    --
    Read Heinlein's 1953 Revolt in 2100, now more than ever.
  23. Re:Mildly OT, since no one else has said it yet .. by Golias · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's just "ho hum, another external hard-drive that isn't worth it". A dollar per gig?! Even with a 10 dollars worth of USB/FW hubs? It's a fucking travesty.

    Actually, as somebody who just bought a Firewire hub for his mini (The EyeTV 500 is a terrific gadget for turning the mini into an HDTV PVR, but it doesn't play nice on a Firewire daisy-chain at all!), I would have almost considered buying this thing a couple months ago. I currently have two external drives (a 250 and a 300), both in el-Cheapo Firewire+USB2 enclosures, and while I came in under $1 per Gig (counting the enclosures, but not counting the hub), the 400GB drives I was looking at did not.

    So $400 for 400GB + a Firewire port replicator is a way I might have seriously considered at the time.

    I'm kind of glad I didn't, though. If the time comes when I want to add another half-TB to my storage, I'll probably just RAID everything in a single box instead, and then I can sell off the old enclosures to friends of mine. That would be a tougher sell had I bought something this specialized.

    --

    Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  24. Re:Mildly OT, since no one else has said it yet .. by TheShmoe · · Score: 1

    I'm curious as to how you expect the manufacturer to make any money off of this thing? I mean if everyone sold things at cost wouldn't that mean there'd be no money to pay your salary?

  25. Does this remind anyone of the 'old' Mac HDs? by compactable · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ... the more things change, the more they stay the same ... http://members.aol.com/suprdave/classiccmp/512_hd2 0.htm

  26. logos by astrodawg · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think their name on the front isn't very attractive. Would be nice to find a way to get rid of it.

    If I bought the item, why do they need to continue to advertise to me?

    1. Re:logos by Thijs+van+As · · Score: 5, Informative

      Just scratch it off with a cube of sugar. Good old trick works always.

    2. Re:logos by djward · · Score: 2, Funny

      If I bought the item, why do they need to continue to advertise to me?

      They're not advertising to you. They're advertising to all of your friends, relatives, pets, and anyone else who walks by.

    3. Re:logos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Brown sugar or white sugar? Discuss.

  27. Heat? by cremilio · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Doesn't stacking the mini impede the airflow? http://www.macintouch.com/macmini05.html

  28. it's nice... by nuckin+futs · · Score: 1

    but i STILL have to reach around to plug in a digital camera or a DV camcorder.
    they should have placed a couple connectors in the front.

    1. Re:it's nice... by foo12 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Mini is 6.5 x 6.5 x 2 -- I used to work on a Titanium PowerBook G4 with ports that were more out of reach than those on a Mini.

    2. Re:it's nice... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have to bet that your Mini will appreciate getting a reach-around from you!

      "Thank you folks, I'll be here all week. Tip your bartenders and waitresses."

  29. Missed the boat; no AV IO. by lullabud · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They clearly aren't paying attention to what people who don't already own Apple hardware, and some that do, want. External hard drives and hubs are easy to come by, but a Video IO packaged into a Mac Mini sized device with IR would be *perfect* for all those people looking to turn the Mac Mini into a media center, or generaly integrating it into their AV setup. I'm sure there's a market for this, especially since it adds hard drive space without having to go inside the Mini, but as far as a port replicator solution, it's only got half of the ports that a great many would-be customers would like to see.

    1. Re:Missed the boat; no AV IO. by norkakn · · Score: 1

      are there any firewire or USB TV in/out products available?

    2. Re:Missed the boat; no AV IO. by martinX · · Score: 1
      --
      When they came for the communists, I said "He's next door. Take him away. Goddam commies."
  30. Econmies of Scale -or- How an ISV Makes Money. by David+Rolfe · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The costs we're talking about here are consumer costs -- what the consumer bears as she buys items one piece at a time, all with their own warranty terms, packaging, shipping blah blah blah. Those costs are inflated to make profit. Bulk purchasers enjoy a reduced cost per unit (vendors often sell bulk at a reduced rate because they in turn enjoy an efficiency). The manufacture should be buying [components] in bulk. I can't believe I'm explaining this.

    A manufacturer, or a systems integrator makes money by packaging his know-how and leveraging his ability to work at scales the consumer can't into a desirable product. Economies of scale is like 7th grade education. If you made it out of high school, why are we having this discussion?

    So, to directly answer your question: How do I expect the manufacturer to make any money off this [mac mini external drive]? I expect them to be able to buy hard-drives cheaper than I can, I expect them to be able to manufacture or purchase enclosures cheaper than I can, I expect them to get usb and firewire hubs cheaper than I can. So, If I can buy the components for the same cost as the manufacture and build it for the same cost it takes them to ship it to me then wtf am I buying? Where is the value? Finally, given that bulk ISVs/manufacturer CAN and DO enjoy economies of scale, I expect them to be making LOTS of "money off this thing", because they aren't passing a dime of that economy on to me.

    HTH, cheers.

    (p.s. when the GP was talking about 30 for the enclosure, that price is reduced by combining the enclosures fw / usb electronics with the hubs' electronics, they are saving even more money, i.e. making even more profit... so, not to keep ranting, the manufacturer saves on electronics, materials, power conversion, and media, and yet somehow, the cost is the same as all of these components seperately. Why not pay more for less?)

    All of this is a long way to say the same damn thing I said hours ago: This device is overpriced and is therefore not news.

    "News flash: neat component for excellent price!"

    is much more interesting than

    "News flash: barely novel component at mediocre price."

    Again sorry to rant. Nothing personal.

    --
    Read Heinlein's 1953 Revolt in 2100, now more than ever.
    1. Re:Econmies of Scale -or- How an ISV Makes Money. by Secret+Agent+99 · · Score: 1

      All of this is a long way to say the same damn thing I said hours ago: This device is overpriced and is therefore not news.

      I agree with your points on pricing and features, but what you're missing, I think, is that this is the first peripheral to adopt the Mac mini form factor. Surely there will be many more, with different features (line in? ports on the front?) and probably different purposes and functionality entirely. But this is the first (isn't it?), mediocre though it may be.

      So: it's the first example of a class of peripherals many Mac users have been waiting for...and besides, how often does "first" equal "best" and "reasonably priced"? Rarely, as far as I can remember.

      Surely that's newsworthy in some small way. Note that it wasn't on the front page, either. Small news, discreet placement. Big deal.

  31. This would be perfect for my friend... by unclethursday · · Score: 1
    He's looking to get a Mac Mini, but is afraid that the 40 or 80 GB drive might not hold all his CDs that he plans to rip for iTunes.

    Now with this, he could get more USB ports (I don't think he has many FireWire devices, if any) as well as get a ton of extra storage for his music.

    When I see him online I'll point him to this as a possible external hard drive add on like we had discussed the other day.

    1. Re:This would be perfect for my friend... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We don't give a fucking shit about you and your gay friend.

  32. Very OT, since no one else has said it yet .. by David+Rolfe · · Score: 1

    Right on. I totally agree. And it sort of makes my point. Even if you'd bought a name brand enclosure+drive like a Lacie 400gb you could get it for $400 bucks. The insinuation being made by this new product is that the extra 5 ports (which costs them basically nothing to add on)* is worth an extra ONE HUNDRED dollars. You went with a solution that is not only more flexible, and a better cost/value, and has the value add of el gato's goodies (AV in/out), and has higher resale value as well. Sounds to me like you are doing a better job than these guys.

    Sounds like you have exactly the set-up that I'm going for with my [future] Mini. It's gonna live in the living room replacing my cheap DVD player and letting me unify all my music storage. I'm seriously considering the eyeTV 200 to move stuff from my Tivo to disk/disc since Tivo has basically dissed Mac owners with the Tivo2go brouhaha... Plus, iChat on the TV -- talk about living in The Future where everyone has video-phones -- saves us money on long distance. How does the eyeTV 500 work with the Mini? I've heard the peanut gallery say the Mini doesn't have the horse power to do HD...

    *(The electronics for the inclosure already include a firewire and usb hub, plus an interface from that to the media SATA/IDE, plus daisy chain socket(s). To claim that this is like a sweet enclosure plus drive plus two hubs is a flat lie. It's a enclosure with some extra ports. A hundred dollars worth of extra ports? You decide).

    --
    Read Heinlein's 1953 Revolt in 2100, now more than ever.
    1. Re:Very OT, since no one else has said it yet .. by Golias · · Score: 4, Informative

      How does the eyeTV 500 work with the Mini? I've heard the peanut gallery say the Mini doesn't have the horse power to do HD...

      Far exceeds expectations.

      On 1080i broadcasts, there is some (very rare) frame-dropping which can happen during very fast camera-pans, but otherwise it does rather well. Even when it does happen, it's subtle enough that most house-guests don't notice it unless I point it out to them.

      720p broadcasts, such as "Tru Calling" on FOX, play smooth as silk, as long as I'm not running other stuff in the background or moving anything else on the firewire bus.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    2. Re:Very OT, since no one else has said it yet .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How fast is your Mac? Is it possible to use one with a G4, and still get decent playback (possibly at a reduced frame size?)

    3. Re:Very OT, since no one else has said it yet .. by Golias · · Score: 1

      How fast is your Mac?

      It's the 1.42 GHz mini. 1 GB of memory. I play everything back at full-frame.

      EyeTV's playback software handles high-def signals really well on it.

      Playing back full-frame high-def on this machine with VLC doesn't work at all, though. I keep VLC around strictly for playing XVCD rips of Doctor Who and such.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

  33. it's nice, but... by nuckin+futs · · Score: 1

    i still have to reach around to connect my usb camera and firewire DV camcorder.
    i wish they would add connectors in the front of the thing.

  34. Useful port replication: share PC peripherals by mzieg · · Score: 1, Interesting
    What I would find useful (read: actually convince me to buy a MacMini) would be a port-replicator switch box that let me share a single keyboard, mouse, and monitor between the MacMini and an existing PC tower.

    The MacMini is an incredibly cute and inviting little accessory, and I'd love to set one atop my desk. However, like most potential Mac converts, my desk surface is already dominated by a monitor, keyboard, and mouse, all connected to the ubiquitous Wintel desktop (or, alright, Linux if you prefer.)

    Nobody is simply going to discard, or even unhook, their existing PC system simply to "try out" a MacMini as an alternative platform. Since two of the MacMini's chief selling points are:

    • size
    • PC-standard ports
    ...wouldn't it make just phenomenal sense to be able to share your existing peripherals during your Mac "test drive"?

    Indeed, many home desktops are "shared" workspaces, and it may well be that between the husband, the wife, and the kids, some users decide to "switch" sooner than others. For compatibility reasons, it may never be an option to "permanently" unhook the PC. For all these reasons and more, I think the MacMini is a nifty idea, held back by the absence of the one critical peripheral it needs to thrive: an A/B switching port replicator.

    (If one of these already exists with support for one-switch flipping of at least two USB devices and one VGA monitor, lemme know and I'll gladly recant and buy me a Mini :-)

    1. Re:Useful port replication: share PC peripherals by mzieg · · Score: 2

      Whoops...apparently what I should have said was "a MacMini is better with a KVM switch", like this. That would have been less typing. Live & learn :-)

    2. Re:Useful port replication: share PC peripherals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are tons of USB KVM devices around, some of which also switch audio, and some of which allow the computer that has the current KVM access to also control a single USB device (usually a printer). When you switch to the other computer, then that computer controls the USB device. IO Gear, Belkin, Dr. Bott (I think) - seriously - use google.

    3. Re:Useful port replication: share PC peripherals by topham · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I have a KVM switch which is USB based.

      It supports 2 VGA monitors, and has 4 USB ports on the console.

      I have my wireless keyboard/mouse from Logitech plugged into it.

      It is hooked up to a Windows XP machine and a PowerMac G5.

      It works well, EXCEPT I dislike the delay when switching from one computer to the other. For general use I run a program called Synergy (available on sourceforge) which allows you to drag the mouse from one computer to the other, with keyboard focus following the mouse.

      Cut & paste of plain text works reasonably well and it makes having a Mac, and PC on the same desk a dream to work with.

      If all that's holding you back from buying a MacMini is the thought of adding a second keyboard and mouse, forget it, go out and buy one. USB based KVM switches are readily available.

      (If you need one with PS/2, and USB support you might have to look harder).

      I recommend both a switch box for those circumstances when synergy doesn't work, and synergy for all other times.

      Dragging a mouse from a PC running Windows XP to a machine running Mac OS X is sure to impress your friends, and you can throw a linux box into the mix too!

    4. Re:Useful port replication: share PC peripherals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed...

      I currently share a keyboard and mouse between a X86 box running linux, a Sun Ultra 5 running Solaris 9, and a Mac on OSX. all on the same desk, with everything going over SSH, so no passwords or text is sent unencrypted (no machines are NAT'd here at work).

      MacSunlinux

      Each box has a use, and it is great not to have to swap keyboards everytime i want to use one. Mix that with X over SSH and i can start any program from one and display it on any of the others!

    5. Re:Useful port replication: share PC peripherals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (If you need one with PS/2, and USB support you might have to look harder).

      Or buy a PS/2->USB or USB->PS/2 adapter, both of which are readily available and dirt cheap.

  35. HTML overview: IE required(!) by bach37 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    When trying to load the HTML presentation, I get this:

    This presentation contains content that your browser may not be able to show properly. This presentation was optimized for more recent versions of Microsoft Internet Explorer.
    If you would like to proceed anyway, click here.


    1. Re:HTML overview: IE required(!) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:HTML overview: IE required(!) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ironic, considering it is a Mac-targeted item You'd think they would understand that a Mac product would attract a Mac user using the standard Mac OS-X browser.

      Not the best marketing ploy.

  36. Ya know.... by catdevnull · · Score: 3, Insightful

    For the price of a *properly outfitted Mini plus the price of this little widget, you could just get either an iBook or maybe even an entry level iMac G5. I'm not saying this isn't filling someone's niche out there, but for the lion's share of users, you might as well get a better processor or go portable if you're starting to get into that kind of spending. But, if your needs are matched up to a Mini (i.e., tight spaces, etc.), then I can see this widget being useful. Otherwise, I think it's more of an accessory than a necessity.

    YMMV.

    *by properly outfitted, I mean a machine that will likely be using those extra ports, etc.-- 1.42 GHZ, superdrive, and 1GB RAM. That, of course, is disputable. If you have to buy a monitor, keyboard, and mouse, then you're really spending some money. Oh, don't forget the "AppleCare" (you might need it!) Now you're looking at ~$1,250.00 (give or take).

    --

    I might know what I'm talkin' about, but then again, this is Slashdot...
    1. Re:Ya know.... by argent · · Score: 1

      Properly outfitted?

      Dude, you can get an external DVD burner that's better than a superdrive for less than the cost of adding a superdrive and removing the internal combo... even if Apple does it.

      This little widget costs about $40 more than a comparable firewire external drive. If you need that storage, you need it whether you've got a mini or an iMac G5, so you're not actually able to say "you can get an iMac G5 for less". In fact, if you can get an iMac G5 for the $40 difference between a LaCie external and this, I want to know where you shop.

    2. Re:Ya know.... by Moofie · · Score: 0

      "I think it's more of an accessory than a necessity"

      Gosh, you're absolutely right. I'm absolutely certain that zero Rwandan refugees are going to be whippin' out the old credit card to purchase this.

      Or, in other words, "No duh."

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
  37. Re:Mildly OT, since no one else has said it yet .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Man, he was joking around. Lighten up!

  38. "miniMate" by Frodo+Crockett · · Score: 3, Funny

    That name makes me picture a very small Australian.

    --
    "The newly born animals are then whisked off for a quick run through a giant baking oven." --heard on Food Network
  39. OT He's called John Howard by OzPeter · · Score: 1

    The miniMate of George Bush

    Though recently I did see a letter to a Melbourne paper that referred to little Johnny Howard as the "Prime Minature" of Australia, and that has now become my fav descripion of our glorious leader.

    --
    I am Slashdot. Are you Slashdot as well?
    1. Re:OT He's called John Howard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are there many midgets in Australia? You might have a new export industry on your hands. Think about it. What child would want a Barbie doll or an action figure when they could have a Mini-Mate instead?

  40. Marketing geniuses at work by Udo+Schmitz · · Score: 1

    "This presentation contains content that your browser may not be able to show properly. This presentation was optimized for more recent versions of Microsoft Internet Explorer."

    Fuckin' brilliant ...

  41. on top/cabinet? by Udo+Schmitz · · Score: 1
    "If the Mac Mini is covered on top by the MiniMate or the pair are stacked in a rack/cabinet/cubbyhole"

    If the Mac mini is covered on top by the Minimate or the pair are stacked in a rack/cabinet/cubbyhole the Mac mini will die a quick death anyway, so noone will have enough time to think about that issue.

  42. IE suggested perhaps.. by ciroknight · · Score: 1

    Uhh.. call me wrong, but wouldn't that suggest IE, not require it?

    --
    "Victory means exit strategy, and it's important for the President to explain to us what the exit strategy is." G.W.Bush
  43. It depends on the _need_ by amichalo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Do that math:
    $500 - Mac mini (w/40GB)
    $75 - additional 512MB RAM
    $25 - bluetooth
    $500 - Minimate with 400 GB
    -----------
    $1100 + S&H for 440GB G4 w/ bluetooth
    So for about $1100 you get a great home media server that is SMALL but has a ton of room for audio and enough for some video until it can be off loaded onto optical media

    or for $200 more ($1300) the iMac G5 with an 80 GB drive. Sure it has a terrific screen, faster processor, but even the yet-to-be-released version is rumored to have 512MB RAM, less than the mini configured above. And the HD is too small to store a large music library or more than a few movies.

    The needs addressed are totally different. For the home entertainment server, the Macmini/Minimate combo is the way to go. You don't need a beautiful 17" flatscreen or the G5 processing power. The G4 is totally capable and the extra drive space is copious. Not to mention if you are interested in the asthetic, having a beautiful and small home server in the stereo rack will draw plenty of oogling eyes.

    --
    I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
  44. Re:Mildly OT, since no one else has said it yet .. by OneDeeTenTee · · Score: 1

    Anyway, if you were a subscriber you could see this surely isn't a purchased account, but it's more fun to troll, isn't it?

    Just curious, how would a subscriber know that account #38 wasn't purchased on ebay?

    Here's your chance to sell me a subscription.

    Oh, and eventually even six digit Slashdot IDs will be desireable.

    --
    Stop the world; I need to get off.
  45. Re:Mildly OT, since no one else has said it yet .. by David+Rolfe · · Score: 1

    Subscribers can search post histories on accounts all the way back, not the just recent x posts. My post history would definitely show a continuity of personhood as the times when I pipe up are usually about a specific set of topics that I'm not completely ignorant on -- what happens at/inside AOL, owning a Mac, Tivo, or Gamecube, Copyright/Public Domain issues, random joking around about low user ids, whether or not Enterprise sucks in light of BSG, graphics, web-dev, Florida, growing up in the 80s and all the retro-gaming and C64 nostalgia that entails, etc. As an aside, I can't believe anyone would buy a slashdot ID. How stupid and narcissistic is that?

    Being able to determine if someone is a schmuk by going through their entire post history really isn't that entertaining though - so I can't say whether it would be worth subscribing.

    And you're right, since eventually means infinity less one, and humans have bad memories and short lives then yes, someday, six digit IDs may have some value. I hope to see that day, because at such point, I may be elevated to the Status of God.

    --
    Read Heinlein's 1953 Revolt in 2100, now more than ever.