Slashdot Mirror


Snails Edge Out ADSL

Anonymous writes "Dear Sirs, Following our experiment last year, and after long preparations, we have successfully proved that certain gastropods called African giant snails can be faster then ADSL and ... pigeons. The system we have used, called SNAP (SNAil-based data transfer Protocol), uses biological carriers (snails), and, for the first time, taking advantages of the unique merits of the wheel for data transfer. More details can be found here."

205 comments

  1. Snails? by PunkOfLinux · · Score: 5, Funny

    So... we can expect new snail-mail any day soon?

    1. Re:Snails? by tomhudson · · Score: 5, Funny
      I'm ready for mine - got the garlic butter and everything.

      Guess you all will have to put up with significant "carrier losses".

    2. Re:Snails? by i.r.id10t · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Naw, you need a hammer and some corn meal. To fry the catfish with. The ones you catch using the snails as bait.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    3. Re:Snails? by shadowbearer · · Score: 2, Funny

      Snail over Satellite; Cooked In Transit with the finest microwaves.
      Fresh at Your Door

      Condiments at your option

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    4. Re:Snails? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Naw, it would be more like waiting for a mail snail. The delivery is slow, but that transfer rate...

      The joys of DVDs...

    5. Re:Snails? by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      i never had much luck catching catfish with snails. Do they realy work? I usualy use chuhbs or bluegill cut in half.

    6. Re:Snails? by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      snails as bait
      I used spaghetti (long story). It worked great.
    7. Re:Snails? by gunpowder · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and when a snail packet is too big you can fragment it with a knife ;)

    8. Re:Snails? by Potor · · Score: 1

      pigeon rank, anyone?

    9. Re:Snails? by TFGeditor · · Score: 1

      Are you that Marine in Iraq who used spaghetti from an MRE to fish in one of Saddam's palace lakes?

      --
      Ignorance is curable, stupid is forever.
    10. Re:Snails? by tomhudson · · Score: 1
      Sorry, can't claim that one. This was LONG ago. We were washing our plates in the lake, and noticed that all of a sudden there were TONS of fish around, after not being able to get a single bite all day.

      So from then on, it was "screw the worms - got any leftover spaghetti?"

      Two guys are fishing, and one is catching fish like crazy, and the other one isn't getting so much as a nibble.
      Guy 1: How come you're catching so many fish and I'm not? What's your secret?
      Guy 2: Ya mumble mumble your mumble mumble.
      Guy 1: What?
      Guy 2: Ya mumble mumble your mumble mumble.
      Guy 1: What???!?!?
      Guy 2: Ptww! Ya gotta keep your worms warm!
    11. Re:Snails? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You people are all such fucking perverts.

    12. Re:Snails? by splitinfinity · · Score: 1

      That's right! They determined the best method to send Snail-Mail was via an encapsulation protocol named, SNAP Link Internet Mail Encapsulation (SLIME). s/i

  2. African VS European giant snails by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Soldier 1- African giant snails CAN be faster then ADSL.

    Soldier 2- Oh, yeah, an African giant snail maybe, but not a European giant snail. That's my point.

    1. Re:African VS European giant snails by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea those africans sure can run....

    2. Re:African VS European giant snails by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Are you suggesting snails are miGRATory?

    3. Re:African VS European giant snails by Jabberu · · Score: 2, Funny

      Pish posh! I still contest nothing beats the african swallow. Snails? Now that's just crazy talk...

      --
      We're not retreating.. we're merely advancing in reverse. - Earthworm Jim
    4. Re:African VS European giant snails by lostwanderer147 · · Score: 2, Funny
      What is the ground-speed velocity of an unladen snail?

      Is that an African giant snail or a European giant snail?

      The answer may have deep implications on the future of snail-mail.

    5. Re:African VS European giant snails by Eccles · · Score: 4, Funny

      But then African giant snails are non-migratory.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    6. Re:African VS European giant snails by Dorothy+86 · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah. :-(

    7. Re:African VS European giant snails by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if you are unfortunate enough to have Verizon ADSL service (DSL for the CO distance-challenged), either/both snails would be faster. I know. Been there, done that -- dial-up = 52kbps D/L and ADSL = 85kbps D/L. Certainly NOT worth $30 or $40 USD per month.

    8. Re:African VS European giant snails by The_reformant · · Score: 1

      Go away or I shall taunt you a second time!

      --
      I have discovered a truly remarkable sig which this post is too small to contain.
    9. Re:African VS European giant snails by homesteader · · Score: 1

      African snails will just be used for local subnet traffic.

  3. Nothing for you to see here. Please move along. by jeremy_dot · · Score: 1

    Nothing for you to see here. Please move along.

    The perfect line to see on my ADSL line...

    1. Re:Nothing for you to see here. Please move along. by dgatwood · · Score: 1
      What's funny here is that, at least compared to my ADSL line, the snails are faster, not only in terms of raw bandwidth, but also in terms of latency. :-D

      Maybe it's just me.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

  4. Today is April 26th by nizo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    But I bet it is April 1 in some universe somewhere. I wonder if a grain or two of salt increases throughput or causes more transmission errors?

    1. Re:Today is April 26th by SuneSpeg · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes it will make a transmission error, but due to the nature of tcp/ip it wont be a big problem.
      However it means that each time you step on a snail from now on, you will have to pick it up, look at the source adress, and send back an icmp code 11,0 (time to live expired in transit).

    2. Re:Today is April 26th by strook · · Score: 1
      Given that snails explode when you put salt on them, it would probably cause some lost packets.

      Or to use the technical term, the snails slime to death.

      --

      "TV is great! Every New Year's I make a resolution to watch more TV." - Ann Coulter

    3. Re:Today is April 26th by shadowbearer · · Score: 1

      Given the density of today's communications, that would give a new meaning to the term "Dancing as Fast as I can". Man,the latency would suck worse than AOL in '99, and the data flow would generate lawsuits (Hey, you mowed a swath thru my porn stream, asshole! I missed the best part!)

      Event_Lost_Packets(Stepped_On:code[Omega])
      Event_Lost_Packets(Pesticide_Application:code[Back Bone_Failure][Omega])
      Event_Lost_Packets(Bird_Swarm:code[Random_Noise][O mega])


      oh, nm, I'm drunk :)

      thanks for the laugh, I needed it

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
    4. Re:Today is April 26th by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      TTL, LOL, good one

    5. Re:Today is April 26th by dascandy · · Score: 1

      you are requested not to encrypt passwords for transport with salts, as the transport network can't handle it reliably.

    6. Re:Today is April 26th by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      They posted this article using snails on April 1st, and it arrived today.

    7. Re:Today is April 26th by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Technically, if u step on the snail it should be considered a lost packet, and then the man who the snail was going to should send a retransmit snail.

      unless if the snail was addressed to you and you stepped on it, then u still would have the DVD's, unless you step on them also, and that would compare your to a guy who deletes his email by mistake and doesnt have backup.

      are you a Microsoft user? :-)

    8. Re:Today is April 26th by Taladar · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't "Back Bone Failure" be more appropriate for "Stepped on"?

    9. Re:Today is April 26th by Meski · · Score: 1

      Perhaps that's what happened to the toads.

  5. Damn Lag! by eriksmithtex · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yeah but the lag sucks!

    1. Re:Damn Lag! by swimin · · Score: 1

      Lag is measured in days!

  6. Snail recipes... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I didn't see any snail recipes. Are they cooked French- or African-style? Are there any stores in the U.S. that sell these snails?

    I didn't know that /. was turning into the Food Network. :P

    1. Re:Snail recipes... by Bad+D.N.A. · · Score: 4, Funny

      Pretty soon we will hear all about how the kids-these-days have figured out that when the anus of the snail is properly licked it will induce a fantastic high.... Thus this new technology will be banned by the department of homeland security.

      --
      "Truth is much too complicated to allow anything but approximations"
    2. Re:Snail recipes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I remember correctly, that species of snail is illegal to have in the USA. So no, you'll have to go elsewhere to eat them.

    3. Re:Snail recipes... by tonyr60 · · Score: 1

      How the fsck did you find that out? More importantly how many animal anuses did you lick (properly or otherwise) and which produced the most fantastic low?

    4. Re:Snail recipes... by dspacemonkey · · Score: 1

      Wow!

      You certainly do a lot to keep your snails happy!

  7. But of course... by Tuxedo+Jack · · Score: 5, Funny

    Nothing beats the sheer bandwidth of a 767 filled with dual-layer DVDs sent hurtling at some destination.

    --

    Striking fear in the authors of godawful fanfiction, I am here, appearing in darkness, Tuxedo Jack!
    1. Re:But of course... by nebaz · · Score: 4, Funny

      There are some latency issues though.

      --
      Rhymes that keep their secrets will unfold behind the clouds.There upon the rainbow is the answer to a neverending story
    2. Re:But of course... by Neurotoxic666 · · Score: 1

      Honnestly, between packing the plane with dual layer DVDs or 300gb+ hard drives, the latter's got more bandwidth. And I'm sure an Übergeek will come up in a few minutes with something even nicer

      --
      You are more than the sum of what you consume. Desire is not an occupation.
    3. Re:But of course... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Unless that destination is a tower.

      What? Someone had to say it.

    4. Re:But of course... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except for the Space Shuttle loaded with 500GB drives. Though probably the acceleration at liftoff would break them all, so we may have to revert to DVDs anyway. But 17,460mph vs 550mph is still almost 32 times faster and probably a comparable payload capacity.

    5. Re:But of course... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ack! The latency will certainly suck. Think of the loading and unloading times and all the trouble you have to go through at the airports these days... Not to mention customs delays.

    6. Re:But of course... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I predict you will get -1 troll because the burger eating murder monkeys hate you. AND DONT TELL ME TO STOP DRINKING.

      ^____________________________________^

    7. Re:But of course... by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 5, Funny

      Nothing beats the sheer bandwidth of a 767 filled with dual-layer DVDs sent hurtling at some destination.

      That's how they slashdotted the WTC back in '01.

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    8. Re:But of course... by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      OK, 300GB drives. That beats your density by eight times!

      You may now call me Übergeek. :)

    9. Re:But of course... by TheScorpion420 · · Score: 1

      bahh prototype HVD's beat your density by 3.33 times

      --
      If you pay your taxes you support terrorism!
    10. Re:But of course... by RaguMS · · Score: 5, Funny

      That's how they slashdotted the WTC back in '01.

      That's not cool, man. Some of those people lost a lot of data.

    11. Re:But of course... by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 1

      That's what they get for putting the datacenter colo facility right friggin next to the original site. That whole thing was really poorly managed -- their server is STILL not back online, like 4 years later.

      --
      You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    12. Re:But of course... by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      ... except, of course, an An-225 filled with hard drives.

    13. Re:But of course... by hairykrishna · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ah ha! Enough time has passed that people can get away with jokes about the WTC

      --
      "Physics is to math as sex is to masturbation." -R. Feynman
    14. Re:But of course... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      That's how they slashdotted the WTC back in '01.

      Man, I can't believe you've not been modded "-5 Unamerican" yet.
    15. Re:But of course... by Virtex · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but imagine the packet loss if the thing were to crash.

      --
      For every post, there is an equal and opposite re-post.
  8. ping sucks by nmosfet · · Score: 3, Funny

    The ping on that must suck really bad though.
    If you want a really high bandwidth, get a truckload of hard drives.

    1. Re:ping sucks by silicon+not+in+the+v · · Score: 1
      The ping on that must suck really bad though.
      Hmm, gaming over SNAP protocol...

      "Dude, I just fragged that guy with my BFG!"
      "BFG? Wasn't that in Doom?"
      "Well what do you expect? I fired at him in 1995."
      --
      We may experience some slight turbulence and then...explode. -Capt. Mal Reynolds
  9. I don't know about you... by 0x461FAB0BD7D2 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I just don't trust anything that starts with "Dear Sir" from Africa, especially when it concerns something quite unbelievable.

    1. Re:I don't know about you... by WonderSnatch · · Score: 3, Funny

      This is from Israel. Israel is not in Africa, it is in Asia. Please see a map for further details.

    2. Re:I don't know about you... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's talking about the fact that they're African SNAILS, you insensitive clod! Didn't even read the article, did you? Just saw the link ended with ".il" and thought you'd "show him", right?

    3. Re:I don't know about you... by Nf1nk · · Score: 3, Funny

      Africa, Asia, europe, New York, Israel, Texas all of them are a long ways east of me and outside of walking distance, I'm not planning on visiting any of them in the near future, so as far as I am concerned they all might as well be in the same place (not the peoples republic of california).

      (painfully stolen from a surfer friend of mine who commented that if it was more than three miles from a good surf break he could'nt care less where it was)

      --
      I used to have a cool sig, back when I cared
  10. What's the Ping Time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sure there's lot's of bandwidth, but the latency is horible.

  11. Snails edge out ADSL? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Wow, Time Warner Cable is right, Road Runner Broadband is much faster than ADSL, especially since snails can outperform ADSL. ;D

  12. In the blog by LittleLebowskiUrbanA · · Score: 4, Funny

    He talks about an Australian lawyer who patented the wheel.

    "In particular, Mr. John Keogh, a Melbourne lawyer, was issued in 2001 a patent for "a circular transportation facilitation device", more commonly known as a wheel.

    And people talk trash about America's patent system. Looks like we're not the only ones with problems.

    1. Re:In the blog by mrmojo · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Well that's what you get when you constantly 'harmonize' your country's IP laws with US laws in return for trade.

    2. Re:In the blog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Australia would like to that you for your Free Trade Agreement.

      That is all.

    3. Re:In the blog by p0rnking · · Score: 3, Informative
    4. Re:In the blog by shadowbearer · · Score: 1


      I'd like to read that one :)

      I kind of like his idea of a different registration service for ideas, tho if something like that were to be done it would have to be completely open.

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
  13. SHIT! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    We slashdotted a snail!

    1. Re:SHIT! by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1, Funny

      We slashdotted a snail!

      Wouldn't that be "Splashdotted"?

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    2. Re:SHIT! by Darth+McBride · · Score: 1

      It should be OK as long as we don't saltdot him. We may experience a loss of connection at that point...

    3. Re:SHIT! by Afrosheen · · Score: 1

      No, more like Smashdotted.

      And to capitalize on my middle of the page treatment, here's proof that the article writer is probably a frequent /. poster. Quoted straight from the headline

      "Snails are faster that ADSL"

      That adsl? Awesome.

  14. think of the latency! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pinging www.google.com [64.233.167.147] with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 64.233.167.147: bytes=32 time=8220000ms TTL=238
    Reply from 64.233.167.147: bytes=32 time=8220000ms TTL=238
    Reply from 64.233.167.147: bytes=32 time=8220000ms TTL=238
    Reply from 64.233.167.147: bytes=32 time=8220000ms TTL=238

    1. Re:think of the latency! by Soruk · · Score: 1

      http://www.escar.go.com: Connection timed out.

      High bandwidth, but could any TCP session survive the latency?

      --
      -- Soruk
  15. Too funny! by Rick+Zeman · · Score: 4, Funny

    In some regions, most notably France, culinary habits may pose a denial-of-service (DOS) risk.

  16. Not legal in US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I don't think you are allowed to bring African Giant snails in the US without a special permit. They reproduce very quickly and are quite destructive to vegitaion.

    Though I though African giant snails were the size of a fist.

    1. Re:Not legal in US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The adults are huge. The young can be quite smaller and the one in the photo looked to be a baby. Perhaps we should go after them for breaking child labor laws.

    2. Re:Not legal in US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      That's why you smuggle them in rectally...

  17. What happens if the snail dies along the way? by Xeo+024 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Does it say "dropped packet"?

    1. Re:What happens if the snail dies along the way? by biryokumaru · · Score: 2, Funny

      Whenever those pigeons fly over me, I'm always afraid of getting hit by dropped packets... =/

      --
      When you're afraid to download music illegally in your own home, then the terrorists have won!
    2. Re:What happens if the snail dies along the way? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you can shove it up your ass, you stupid bastard.

  18. There's already a SNAPv2 coming out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...that uses compression and decompression at the endpoints to increase bandwidth, but they're having some technical issues at the decompression step that might cause the release date to slip.

    1. Re:There's already a SNAPv2 coming out... by PinkFreud · · Score: 1

      Actually, I think that the technical difficulties happen at the compression step - once compressed, the data tends to go nowhere.

  19. Not an April Fool's joke... by parasonic · · Score: 0

    Beats the TCP-like pigeon spec RFC1149.

    1. Re:Not an April Fool's joke... by morbuz · · Score: 1

      Which was implemented by Bergen Linux User Group in 2001 :)

      http://www.blug.linux.no/rfc1149/

      --
      CAPS LOCK IS LIKE CRUISE CONTROL FOR COOL!
    2. Re:Not an April Fool's joke... by m50d · · Score: 1

      This seems to be a far more efficient protocol. The pidgeon one requires OCRing the packets, I'm sure you could use SD cards or similar to get better bandwidth and accuracy.

      --
      I am trolling
    3. Re:Not an April Fool's joke... by silicon+not+in+the+v · · Score: 1
      This seems to be a far more efficient protocol. The pidgeon one requires OCRing the packets, I'm sure you could use SD cards or similar to get better bandwidth and accuracy.
      At the risk of asking you to violate your Slashdot user agreement by reading the article, I might mention that they do refer to the pigeons carrying 1.3gigabits on flash cards.
      --
      We may experience some slight turbulence and then...explode. -Capt. Mal Reynolds
  20. How many chips does it take... by ShineyMcShine · · Score: 1

    to beat out adsl? How many 1 GB SD Flash chips can an African giant snail carry on its back?

  21. Hehe - first thought: by starseeker · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Ig Nobel Prize!

    --
    "I object to doing things that computers can do." -- Olin Shivers, lispers.org
  22. Easy to DOS attack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Just add a little salt and down goes the network.

    1. Re:Easy to DOS attack by utlemming · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but that is more of a DOS. If you want to do malicious sniffing, then put out a dish of beer. The snails will be drawn to the beer, as opposed to being repelled by the salt. Then they get into the dish and drink themselves to death. This is a Garden Center trick which works very, very well.

      --
      The views expressed are mine own and do not express the views of my employer.
  23. yes by soimless · · Score: 3, Funny

    I for one welcome our new african snail overloards. But I wonder how the email service you get with our snail overloars would compare to my curent ADSL provider

    1. Re:yes by Meski · · Score: 1

      Ah, African snails. Use a cheque for 1 million USD ($1,000,000.00) to attract them.

  24. Actually, that's easy to beat. by melted · · Score: 3, Funny

    Just load the same 767 with 500GB Hitachi hard drives.

    1. Re:Actually, that's easy to beat. by ari_j · · Score: 1

      Or a 747 or A380. For that matter, an oil tanker converted to haul hard drive platters would give far greater throughput, although even worse latency and, if you take the platters out of the drive cases to increase throughput, you may get some increase in data loss.

    2. Re:Actually, that's easy to beat. by dangitman · · Score: 2, Funny
      Just load the same 767 with 500GB Hitachi hard drives.

      Yeah, but you'd have to load them into the cargo bay perpendicularly to get the highest bandwidth.

      --
      ... and then they built the supercollider.
    3. Re:Actually, that's easy to beat. by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 2, Funny

      I can beat that. How about a planet called Earth, with all of the hard drives, CDs, DVDs, memory sticks, grocery lists, and cuneiform tablets that are on it. Sort of a token ring. Maximum latency anywhere on the ring is one year.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
  25. A possible hitch. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's just hope these snails don't pass through France. Little fuckers won't stand a chance.

  26. hahahaha by iosmart · · Score: 1

    From the article: "The third and foremost [advantage] is that unlike pigeons, ADSL doesn't shit on your head, or on your car."

  27. Fast, but fast enough? by NeoSkink · · Score: 1

    How does it compare to S.W.O.D.V.D.T.P?

    AKA Station Wagons o' DVDs?

  28. Beware by Jeremi · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Oh sure, it sounds good at first, but beware of the Curse of the Fast Snails!

    --


    I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
  29. Best Quote? by rjhall · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think:
    "In particular, French users will have to choose whether they want to be served data-ex-cargo or an escargot."
    comes near the top of the list.

  30. Re:Cool by eno2001 · · Score: 1

    Oh. For a second there, I thought you might have had something important to say. But apparently I was mistaken. Of course, as they say, only time will tell.

    --
    -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
  31. Hang on, lets establish some standards here... by spagetti_code · · Score: 3, Informative
    The problem is that they were comparing snails travelling over very short distances (cms) to pigeons travelling 100km. To take that to its illogical conclusion, a photon (carrying, say, 8 bits of color information) travels 1um in 1/3x10^14 secs. Therefore this is carrying 3x10^14 bytes/sec or about 300Tbytes/sec. That rivals the 747 carrying DVDs.

    I think if we are going to establish bandwidth records we need to establish distance too. I suggest 100kms is probably a pretty good minimum measure to make sense.

    1. Re:Hang on, lets establish some standards here... by ICECommander · · Score: 1

      That would be 8 photons (qubits) and 1/3x10^-14

      --
      All your Sybase are belong to us.
    2. Re:Hang on, lets establish some standards here... by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      Only if you treat each photon as representing a single-digit binary value. You can have it represent any number of bits, if you divide the spectrum into that many ranges, and measure the photon's energy.

    3. Re:Hang on, lets establish some standards here... by spagetti_code · · Score: 1
      one photon can have different energy levels (in my simple mind, lets call them colours).

      Also 1/(3x10^14).

    4. Re:Hang on, lets establish some standards here... by eraserewind · · Score: 1

      Maybe we can use the snails for shorter distance protocols, like bluetooth or wifi.

  32. That expirement is flawed by Chris+Kamel · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Shouldn't the time to burn the dvds be calculated and added to the transfer time?

    And I'm trying so hard to take this seriously

    --
    The following statement is true
    The preceding statement is false
    1. Re:That expirement is flawed by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      Definitely! As well as read time on the other end, if applicable.

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
  33. IT COULD GRIP IT BY THE HUSK! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "faster then"? Didn't they teach you grammar?

    1. Re:IT COULD GRIP IT BY THE HUSK! by robfoo · · Score: 1

      they did, but she went to school ages ago.

  34. WRONG by eobanb · · Score: 1

    an Antonov AN-225 filled with blu-ray discs

    --

    Take off every sig. For great justice.

    1. Re:WRONG by Mercano · · Score: 1

      Though even that may be beeten by an A380. Hard to say; wikipedia didn't provide any easily-comparable numbers, and I am not sure if it is weight or volume is the limiting factor. (I'm guessing the latter, but lust guessing.) Also consider the Super Guppy, which probably wins the volume wars.

      --
      #include <signature.h>
  35. transatlanticism by fallendove · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Unfortunately, some users mistook "it's cargo" for "escargot" and reported data loss.

  36. From snails point of view, data rate ~= 0 bps by davidwr · · Score: 1

    From the snail article linked:
    "If measured by the moving snail itself, times would have been a bit shorter, according to Einstein's relativity theory, resulting in slightly greater bps rates."

    If measured by the moving snail itslef, the data would be moving at approximately 0 meters per second, therefore, 0 bits per second. However, the source and destination would be moving relative to the carrier.

    --
    Knowledge is how to play a game, intelligence is how to win, wisdom is knowing what game to play.
    1. Re:From snails point of view, data rate ~= 0 bps by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      They're referring to measureing time from the snail's perspective. As you increase velocity, the amount of time you experience relative to your surroundings decreases.

    2. Re:From snails point of view, data rate ~= 0 bps by Durandal64 · · Score: 1

      Greater transfer rates according to the snails. However, the time that matters is the time it takes for the data to reach the other end, which is not a part of the snail's reference frame.

  37. Moores Law & other predictions. by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 4, Funny
    Moores Law: Next year's snails will be faster and carry 2GB.

    IBM: The world will only need five snails.

    DEC: Nobody wants a snail in their home.

    Microsoft: The new Longhorned snail is shipping.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:Moores Law & other predictions. by spagetti_code · · Score: 1

      BillG: a 640K snail should be enough for anyone

    2. Re:Moores Law & other predictions. by commanderfoxtrot · · Score: 4, Funny

      I think he's right on this one: eating 640K of snails would probably be enough for me.

      --
      http://blog.grcm.net/
  38. THAN, for the love of... THAN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Dear Editors:

    Faster THAN. Faster THAN. Faster THAN.

    Same as:

    Smarter THAN. Better THAN. Other THAN. Fatter THAN. Uglier THAN. Costs more THAN. Performs better THAN. More difficult THAN. Takes more effort THAN. Tastes better THAN. Prints more clearly THAN. More structured THAN. More anonymous THAN. More cowardly THAN. More falsely THAN.

    Basic idea:

    THAN - used in comparison statements.
    THEN - used to demonstrate cause-and-effect

    1. Re:THAN, for the love of... THAN! by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Than what?

    2. Re:THAN, for the love of... THAN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Strange. A similar thing is happening in the Dutch language.

      In standard Dutch it's: "kleiner dan" (smaller than), but the current teen generation says: "kleiner als" (smaller as).

      Maybe this can be exported to Engligh too. So:

      Faster AS. Faster AS. Faster AS.

      Same as:

      Smarter AS. Better AS. Other AS. Fatter AS. Uglier AS. Costs more AS. Performs better AS. More difficult AS. Takes more effort AS. Tastes better AS. Prints more clearly AS. More structured AS. More anonymous AS. More cowardly AS. More falsely AS.

      You likee?

    3. Re:THAN, for the love of... THAN! by ricky-road-flats · · Score: 1
      Basic idea:

      THAN - used in comparison statements.
      THEN - used to demonstrate cause-and-effect

      A fair point well made, but I wouldn't expect miracles if I was you... look who you're talking to.

      They also need serious help with their/there and affect/effect, amongst others...

    4. Re:THAN, for the love of... THAN! by lifer_red · · Score: 1

      If you're going to be pedantic...

      More falsely? Surely "More false THAN".

    5. Re:THAN, for the love of... THAN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      A fair point well made, but I wouldn't expect miracles if I was you.

      Correction: if I WERE you. The statement is subjunctive (you are expressing a wish), thus the subjunctive 'were' should be used in place of the past-tense singular 'was.' Let's look at an example:

      "If I was evil, then I am sorry."
      "If I were evil, I would not be sorry."

    6. Re:THAN, for the love of... THAN! by silicon+not+in+the+v · · Score: 1
      Strange. A similar thing is happening in the Dutch language.

      In standard Dutch it's: "kleiner dan" (smaller than), but the current teen generation says: "kleiner als" (smaller as).
      Oh, that sounds a lot like a very irritating turn of (incorrect) phrase I hear sometimes from native English speakers.

      It comes up when referring to something being less than expected or maybe not as far as expected. People will use the phrase, "Is that all the farther you have to go?" or "Is that all the more you have to do?"

      Correct phrases would be "Is that as far as you have to go?" or "Is that all you have to do?" I don't hear it very often, but boy it sounds awful when I do hear it.

      This is probably my biggest irritation in people's use of language, followed closely by use of the non-word irregardless. Third place is people using the word "mute" instead of "moot" to refer to something that is no longer of importance, as in "a mute point".
      --
      We may experience some slight turbulence and then...explode. -Capt. Mal Reynolds
  39. CRAP, damn snails by TK2K · · Score: 1

    DAMNIT!!! the snails get less ping then i do!!! Wonder if there any good at Counter Strike?

    1. Re:CRAP, damn snails by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      If you ping a snail, does it become broadband?

  40. You forgot... by game+kid · · Score: 1

    Apple: You can bring an snail home, take it out of the box, and be cruising the internet in less than ten minutes.

    (or is it an iSnail?)

    --
    You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
  41. weee by katpants · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can now proudly say that my school's internet connection is literally slower than a snail (10Mbps).

  42. Hah! by breakbeatninja · · Score: 1

    How long will it be until Alan Cox makes a real world implementation for Linux? :-P

    --
    shop.envescent.com - Computer hardware and more.
  43. cute, but by wk633 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    but 'faster than ADSL' in bandwidth only. Latency is important too- and for biological carrier class in general- sucks.

  44. Now, that's is a helluva fun by Tamerlan · · Score: 2, Funny

    But let's see...

    • Trained dog with a 400GB HDD on neck
    • A cat with a bunch of Blu-rays glued to her back (Yay!)
    • A goose with SD cards attached to rings
    • Pony with a wagon full of microdrives (whoa!)

    will easily beat that!

    1. Re:Now, that's is a helluva fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      1.) Vibration from dog's gait vs. drive heads? High rate of data corruption likely. Also, easy to intercept if you're a skilled shot.

      2.) Amusing, but the thrashing of the cat would destroy the media. It'd never get there anyway.

      3.) Possible, although ducks may be faster, and I believe the pigeon protocol is similar, and both more thoroughly developed and tested.

      4.) See 1, both concerning vibration and security. Also, I'm not confident in a pony's ability to traverse considerable distances unmanned. Depending on both the dog and pony, however, this may be the most adorable option.

      I would like to see the viability of a salmon-based system for areas near water. Or, perhaps, a micropacket (say, 50kb each) interface using nanostorage units mounted on bees or ants and pollen- or sugar-dusted Bluetooth-enabled storage units with an embedded-Linux hive server.

      No, seriously.

    2. Re:Now, that's is a helluva fun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um.. I think you're forgetting the obvious answer here... Two swallows with a coconut full of usb drives on a line

  45. Confucius say: by themuffinking · · Score: 1

    Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon filled with backup tapes.

    1. Re:Confucius say: by wk633 · · Score: 1

      that was Andy Tanenbaum.

  46. This has nothing by GoClick · · Score: 1

    This has nothing on an 18 wheeler full 300GB hard drives clipping down the highway. Or atleast a camel with some hard drives taped to it...

  47. Re:Cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What did you have to say/contribute that merited turning on your karma bonus, hypocrite?

  48. Beware of Trojan Snails - You May be Infected. by refactored · · Score: 1

    Bilharzia, one of Africa's nastiest "payloads".

  49. Re:Horrible Joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Meanwhile, I don't think that the families of the 50,000+ "dead" (first estimates gave that as a bare minimum) would mind too much.

  50. Encapsulation Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An idea for the SNAP experiment. What if a form of compression was used to compress the data transfered thru snap. Similar to the 5x as fast dialup proxy services!!!

    Or an even larger potential increase would be to piggy back a few more data wheels on the snail cart..

    I am unsure of a snails lifting capacties but I would guess based on the picture provided he is not even stressed at this point... what if you added say another 10 dvd's on his chassis?

    Now if he could make the trek at the same speed this would increase the SNAP xfer speed to 222,000 a HUGE 6fold increase!!! though I could potentiall see it only being able to increase it 5fold as I would speculate he would be weighed down and incumbered. I eagerly await the test results.

    (Another potential would be the travling from a higher altitude to a lower might even increase his speed more?

  51. Re:Cool by eno2001 · · Score: 1

    Turning on my karma bonus? Don't you mean turning it off? It's on by default as it should be. I have the option to not use it if I don't want to, but I only do that when posting something that is really WAYYYYY off topic. Settle down there spunky, you might bust a nut or something. Hypocrite? Care to elaborate?

    --
    -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
  52. Re:Cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You accused the person of having nothing important to say. I looked at your post, it was offtopic and had nothign important to say either, yet not only were you hypocritical for making an equally unimportant post by pointing that out, you left your karma bonus turned on when you had NOTHING IMPORTANT TO SAY that merited the bonus.

    Moron.

  53. this guy is WEIRD by moosesocks · · Score: 1

    The person who conducted this reasearch is quite the character...

    He posts anonymously, but leaves his E-mail address, not to mention the fact that he specializes in measuring the digital throughput of small animals

    If DNA or Dave Barry were still writing, I'm sure they'd come up with something clever about this whole situation :)

    --
    -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
  54. Re:Horrible Joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    You punch the US, they punch back harder... it's the American Way(TM)

  55. Re:Cool by eno2001 · · Score: 1

    So you actually, actively turn your karma bonus off a lot do you? I don't see the point...

    --
    -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
  56. BAHAHAHHAHAHAHAAHAH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    soo...bad...yes...so....awesome...

    1. Re:BAHAHAHHAHAHAHAAHAH by sp0rk173 · · Score: 1

      Fuck, that should be "yet" not "yes"

    2. Re:BAHAHAHHAHAHAHAAHAH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      And no longer anonymous. :)

    3. Re:BAHAHAHHAHAHAHAAHAH by sp0rk173 · · Score: 1

      I actually dind't mean to post anonymously the first time!

  57. Re:Horrible Joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Somehow I think those who found it funny don't care.

  58. Re:Horrible Joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    What 50000+? Is that the number of people found in those mass graves?

  59. Re:Cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Nelson voice: Ha ha... You got schooled by an AC!

  60. Re:Horrible Joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, if by punch back harder you mean flip out and punch anyone at random.

  61. Does anyone remember Dr. Dolittle? by eh2o · · Score: 1

    ...and the giant snail with a transparant shell that transported him across the ocean? That was one cool snail. Even though my ADSL has 6mbit downstream, I'd trade a snail ride for my line anyday.

  62. Re:Cool by eno2001 · · Score: 1

    Who is Nelson? What is this "schooled" you speak of? I would like to subscribe to your newsletter.

    --
    -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
  63. Bygone era? by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 1
    Never underestimate the bandwidth carrying capacity of a station wagon loaded with backup tapes.

    (I think that one, or something very similar, is attributed to Andrew Tanenbaum... Back in the day, when there was no easy way to UUCP stuff between America and Australia, there was a legend that newsfeeds were saved on magnetic tape, loaded into a station wagon, driven to the airport, and flown across the ocean. Personally, I don't believe it, as it would be much easier, cheaper, and faster to dial in via modem, expensive as long distance calling was in that bygone era. But it's a nice story, anyway.)

    1. Re:Bygone era? by Anthony · · Score: 1

      And how fast were modems in the early 80s? You are right about the tapes though. Robert E;s used to get a tape delivered, but it wasn't the Usenet Feed for the week.

      --
      Slashdot: Where nerds gather to pool their ignorance
  64. Over 100 posts by Headcase88 · · Score: 1

    ... And not a single comment that contains the string "Duke Nukem Forever"? Boys, I'm a little disappointed.

    --
    "When the atomic bomb goes off there's devastation...but when the atomic bong goes off there's celebraaaaation!"
  65. I am faster than t1! by xgamer04 · · Score: 1

    So if I throw my CD case down the hall, do I set a data-transfer record?

    Seriously though, read TFA, it's pretty funny.

    --
    When you look at the state of the world, how can you not become a radical, liberal anarchist?
  66. Re:Horrible Joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am!

  67. Summary of comments by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    If I put {hugeamount} of {storagedevice} in/on {transportationdevice or animal} the bandwidth I get is {reallylargenumber}. The latency though I get from {transportationdevice or animal} sucks.

    So if I put an even {ridiculouslyhugeammount} of {largerstoragedevice} in/on {strongeranimal or largertransportationdevice} the bandwidth is {evenlargernumber}. The latency though I get from {strongeranimal or largertransportationdevice} still sucks.

    What we need is {fasteranimal or fastertransportationdevice} which also is {strongeranimal or largertransportationdevice}. That would be neat.

    ps. What is it with you moderators to mod up the 10 comments with identical content!?

  68. First Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (I'm using the snail protocol to connect to Slashdot)

  69. african giant snails by __aahlyu4518 · · Score: 1

    Not American giant snails because they are to fat ;-)

  70. A 747 filled with people by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    would be more than all those hard disks, if you count each DNA strand. Of course, there's a lot of redundancy there; but even if you don't count the redundant backups (in each cell), you've got a lot.

  71. LuxDSL: Slower than snails... and proud of it! by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Only in Luxembourg will you see this:

    LuxDsl -- Slower than snails, and proud of it!

    Also, they think that expressing the subscription price per day will make it look cheaper (well, at least, it's less expensive than before: it used to cost double than the current, still outrageous prices...)

  72. No French fries^H^H^H^H^Hsnails by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There are no longer French snails in the U.S., only Freedom snails.

  73. Re:Horrible Joke by presroi · · Score: 1

    Would you prefer a "That's how we slashdotted those Afghan villages"?

  74. upgrades by Yurithedragon · · Score: 1

    well its nice to see snail mail is finaly getting upgraded

  75. Mail control by prjames · · Score: 2, Funny

    Does this mean I've got to learn how to write "shell" scripts to run my mail now? And what a boon to tracking spammers. Just follow that slime back to source.

  76. Never underestimate the bandwidth of a Volvo wagon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Reminds me of an ancient (1970's) computer science maxim: "never underestimate the bandwidth of a Volvo wagon full of mag tapes".

    Perhaps today it would be CD's:
    Hmmmm ... capacity about 700Mb/CD x 1000 CDs/m pile x 1m x 2m x 3m = approximately 1,120,000,000 Mb/Volvo = 1,120 Tb/Volvo @ 100 km/h = approximately 112,000 Tb-km/h per Volvo. That's a lot of data movement!

    J

  77. The mother of throughput for trans-continential by evillamer · · Score: 1

    Fill a Ultra-Large Crude Carrier full of 500GB harddisk.

    Latency would be counted in days/weeks or months depending on location, and also fragmentation of packets may result if the location is not at a port and require the use of trucks.

    1. Re:The mother of throughput for trans-continential by kemkerj · · Score: 1

      Simple. Limit the MTU to 500GB. No fragmented packets.

  78. nothing, exept... by N3wsByt3 · · Score: 1

    "Nothing beats the sheer bandwidth of a 767 filled with dual-layer DVDs sent hurtling at some destination."

    Exept an Airbus A380 filled with dual-layer DVDs sent hurtling at some destination.

    So, clearly, a european airplane is better then an afri...I mean, american one.

    --
    --- "To pee or not to pee, that is the question." ---
  79. Look at it this way... by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1
    you left your karma bonus turned on when you had NOTHING IMPORTANT TO SAY that merited the bonus.

    Well, just look at it this way: by leaving his karma bonus on, eno2001 volunteered to losing 3 karma points, rather than 2 to offtopic moderations, which is a good thing, IMHO, because three thwacks with a stick hurt more than two.

    On the other hand, moderators seem to be rather lazy today, the post still has its two points :(

    (But I'm sure that my own post will lose 2 points within the next five minutes, for giving out advice to the moderators, which for some reason appears to be an impardonable offense here on Slashdot!)

  80. No, the Antonov is the biggest by commanderfoxtrot · · Score: 1

    No, the Antonov An-225 is larger than the new Airbus A380.
    The A380 is the world's largest passenger aircraft, but the Antonov is much bigger. Just look at those 32 wheels!

    The Antonov can carry 250 tons; can anyone do the maths and see if 250 tons of CDs will actually fit in the hold!?!? The An-225's cargo volume is 1100m3.

    --
    http://blog.grcm.net/
    1. Re:No, the Antonov is the biggest by commanderfoxtrot · · Score: 1

      In reply to my own post, apparently 384 50-disc spindles is 1 cubic metre. So that's 21,120,000 CDs/DVDs/fancy new Bly-ray type discs. Quite a lot.

      CDs weigh arond 16 grams. The above number of disks would come to 337 metric tonnes; therefore you would not actually be able to get the whole lot in the plane. Unless you started taking out fuel &c.

      --
      http://blog.grcm.net/
  81. Up your AS ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nt

  82. Re:Horrible Joke by Pyrion · · Score: 1

    The initial estimates for number of dead at the WTC called for a fuckton of extra bodybags because the initial assumption was that both towers were filled to capacity when the planes hit.

    --
    "There is much pleasure to be gained from useless knowledge." - Bertrand Russell.
  83. your math fu is weak by chrish · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Do the numbers in the article include time to burn the snail DVDs and then read the data back off of them at the end point? What about the time required to attach the DVDs to the snail harness (I'll assume they've got a harnessed snail ready while burning the DVDs)...

    Probably still several orders of magnitude faster than dial-up.

    --
    - chrish
    1. Re:your math fu is weak by Yaotzin · · Score: 1

      Yes, and this also requires a sysadmin somwhere to sit, constantly on watch for people wanting to download stuff so they can burn and attach DVD's to snail. I doubt it's very cost efficient.

      --
      Error: No error occurred
  84. Re:Horrible Joke by orasio · · Score: 1

    Yes, "punching back", a la Larry McVoy's, hitting random targets.

  85. This has problems!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry but this isn't going to work.

    The LGS is way too bug sensitive!

  86. Their server must be using snail by Postalbunny · · Score: 1

    I can't get anthing to load... i guess the snails that they use for their web server arn't trained up to handle slashdotting yet.

  87. Quote... by Otto · · Score: 1

    The quote is in some versions of Tanenbaum's Computer Networks, and it goes like this:
    "Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes hurtling down the highway."

    However, the legend is of course not true. Australia has had a stable newsfeed since 1983 or thereabouts. The guy who set it up got his news from Melbourne by dialing into Berkeley, and he occassionally had tapes of his saved backup stuff mailed to him, which is likely where the legend originated.

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  88. Most need permit; Giant African banned outright. by abb3w · · Score: 1
    Karma-whoring Authoritative Source; Giant African snails are banned in the US for being potential carriers for a parasite, as well as being a fast reproducing agricultural pest. People also require a permit to import any snail into the country, or move snails across state lines.

    So, would the data carrier's illegal nature in the US prevent digital snails from being elligible for acceptance as a standard? It's not patented... it's just illegal.

    --
    //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
  89. What about small data amounts? One spare wheel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Noboby mentioned to have thought about this until now: What about the transfer of small data amounts? It would be an immense waste of material and cost to transfer every data packet with _TWO_ disks. I am convinced that at a graph the data figure vs. size of datas clearly has its center at many, relatively small datas, especially at a worldwide scale. One should not only look at US-American demands and possibilities! The use of only one wheel seems to be a little instable. Is there any plan for an exchange system of publicly available, no or low cost spare-wheels only for making the value-data-transfer stable and cost-saving?

    1. Re:What about small data amounts? One spare wheel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      May be AOL can care for those spare wheels? They have experience in wide spread CD distribution and that would make sense then.

  90. Well, if distance isn't a deterant to speed now... by hurfy · · Score: 1

    Looks like AOL is a LOT faster than we thought!

    Those disks really move with a good backhand ;)

    Wouldn't it be even quicker to just pick up the computer and step over/around/on the snails?

  91. Snail IP input device by Toby236 · · Score: 1

    Someone with information about maximum angle of ramp to input decice out there? Just to be sure the datas can be received well and read propperly without human interference.
    Why cant I get rid of the imagination of pyramid building with many workers at a ramp carryinng stones?

    Or does the DVD reader have to be mounted vertical and at the floor for this new technology?

  92. It's true! by zoogies · · Score: 1

    Tried to access CNN today, and while I'm sitting here tapping the mousepad, the darndest thing happens! Snail leaps in through the window, god knows how he got up there, delivers me a stack of the latest articles...good snail...this new snaip is dynamite.

  93. A possible, better alternative to SNAIP by planetoid · · Score: 0

    Use one of these huge sons of bitches to lug around data in even larger and even more wheels at once.

    --
    Slashdot requires you to wait longer between hitting 'reply' and submitting a comment.
  94. A mute point by KingSkippus · · Score: 1

    True story, posted so late now that it probably won't be read.

    I was in a meeting at work one time, and we were discussing some serious issue or another. One of the guys referred to something as a "mute" point. I thought it was kind of funny, but I held the giggle in. After all, I was in an important business meeting. Well, you know what happens when you stifle a giggle, it comes back as a full-fledged laugh, and it's MUCH hard to stifle. Still, I'm pretty good, and I managed it. Well, then I felt kind of silly, because here we were discussing the future of our company, and I'm literally biting my tongue to keep from laughing.

    Well, you KNOW what happens when you stifle a full-fledged laugh, it comes back as a sudden uncontrollable fit of laughing, the kind that is simply unstiflable.

    So a full minute to two after the guy's comment about a "mute" point, after someone else has starting talking about something completely different, I burst out laughing so hard I just couldn't stop. The whole room turned to me as if to say, "What the hell is WRONG with this guy!?"

    I was laughing SO hard that I could barely breathe. Forget talking, all I could squeak out was, "mute point... mute point!" Well, that didn't help any, of course, because by that time, I felt like a genuine idiot, and I had stepped in so far that all I could do was get up (still laughing), walk out (still laughing), and hope for the best.

    After that incident, I think I widely had the reputation as the "crazy loon who laughed his ass out of an important meeting repeatedly saying, 'mute point.'" On the bright side, my presence at future meetings was seldom required. Of course, they never let me use any scissors after that, either...

    Now, whenever I hear someone say "mute" point, I feel compelled to politely correct them because I do NOT want a similar incident to happen again. People, if there is a lesson to be learned here, it is to NEVER stifle a giggle.