Terra Soft Releases 64-bit Yellow Dog Linux
Kai Staats writes ""With Tiger 'unleashed' in 48 hours and even Microsoft caught-up in the 64-bit wave, we give into peer pressure and release this interim set of ISOs. A compilation of our work to date as we move toward the early summer release of v4.1, Yellow Dog Linux v4.0.90 is built upon eighteen months in-house and customer experience with 64-bit," states Kai Staats, CEO Terra Soft Solutions."
Yellow Dog Linux runs on the PowerPC architecture, which would be Apple hardware.
"You're older than you've ever been, and now you're even older."
Well IBM makes those processors, why not file under IBM? Or better yet under Linux or something?
I guess it shows how interesting this article is to me when I'm willing to quibble over its filing!
Thinkin' Lincoln - a web comic of presidential proportions
I see the announcement of iso's, I just can't find them on any of the webpages. :) I'm sure there'd be a lot of people who'd be willing to help with a bittorrent seed, if one is officially available.
On a slightly different note, I know Debian, Mandrake, and some other linux distrobutions have PPC offerings and 64-bit offerings as well. How come it took so long for there to be a 64-bit PPC offering? Just not enough of an installed userbase?
"What do you think?" "I think 'What, do you think?!'"
Gentoo has had 64bit support for PPC for what, a couple of months now? Isn't yellow dog only focused on PPC? Why does it take them this long? Do they just not have the manpower? This isn't a troll, just an honest question.
The Television Wiki
Well IBM makes those processors, why not file under IBM?
Well, generally, an operating-system needs a bit more than a processor to run, Mr. Utterly Clueless.
What are you, an Indian contractor? Stupid as hell.
Features http://www.yellowdoglinux.com/products/ydl.shtmlp hp?submit=ydl#ydl
Purchase http://www.terrasoftsolutions.com/store/purchase.
if you're really interested, disregard the trollage.
If you check the sidebar for the story, you'll notice it's filed under Operative Systems and Linux as well as under Apple, just as you suggest.
Does anybody know how these guys stay in business? They seem to have free downloads, and I can't see any support packages that they charge for. (à la Red Hat)
Is this a business or just a bunch of volunteers? I'm not trolling here, it's just a question.
And Mr. Troll is trying to kill it. Don't let the poor, angry thing's spewings get to you.
"
Well IBM makes those processors, why not file under IBM? Or better yet under Linux or something?"
Have you even been to TerraSoft's site? Because if you had, you'd notice that they're an exclusive Apple reseller for Macs that come pre-loaded with Linux.
Nothing to do with IBM, btw, except for the G5s.
Read more details here.
Wireless works through Mac-On-Linux which is included. Onboard sound for Non-G5 machines at the moment (mini onboard sound doesn't work at the moment either). Sleep function works now for laptops.
I've heard some people refer to Darwin as a pseudo 64bit system, in reference to the fact that it uses a 32bit kernel. Both YDL and Darwin support 64bit memory addressing. Are there any other aspects of an os that need to be addressed in order to fully utilize the architecture? Also what benefit does the 64bit kernel actually provide over 32bits? Apple seems to have covered its bases with respect to HPC functionality like the math libraries and the memory addressing.
No the Airport Extreme wireless is based on the now infamous 'broadcom ' wireless chipset.Most Linux users on the PPC platform have given up any hope of getting this to work, ever! On the x86 platform, broadcom cards use the excellent ndiswrapper http://ndiswrapper.sf.net/ project.
YDL was the first Linux distro I was able to put on my powerbook when I was new to Linux in general. It was very easy to install, X, soundcards were detected & configured automatically. I got used to using Linux, then I got tired of yum and the whole rpm thing. So, i went the Debian way for about 6 months. I installed Panther, and ever since have not looked back.
There's also an issue about Darwin not really utilizing its microkernel, but running processes on a subsystem as though on a monolithic kernel. What does it all mean? I assume an optimized microkernel would make little difference.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Signature_bloc