Slashdot Mirror


Third Parties Already Taking Advantage of Tiger

tezbobobo writes "Tiger been out hours and already the Apple download page has been updated to take advantage of the update's new features. These cover areas including Spotlight plugins, Dashboard plugins, and Automator plugins. These allow a range of actions from searching within omnigraph documents (spotlight), to resizing photoshop documents (automator), and (my fav) a dashboard wireless locator. The best bit -- a cursory glance indicates about half are freeware."

59 of 371 comments (clear)

  1. Silly people by chia_monkey · · Score: 5, Funny

    Silly people! Dont' they know Apple is going out of business? They have been for the past decade or so.

    --

    "He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lampposts...for support rather than illumination." - Andrew Lang
  2. Other Widget Download Site by sammykrupa · · Score: 4, Informative
    Here is another Widget download site:

    http://www.dashboardlineup.com/

    (I should say that I am partly affiliated with it.)

    1. Re:Other Widget Download Site by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 2, Insightful

      the fact that the widgets are 20 MBs in RAM for one. the JS system is slow, and the widgets are on the desktop all the time.

      I think it is funny that the konfab guys think that confab widgets are easier to develop than HTML/CSS + scripting language of your choice which is found in Dashboard.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  3. Dashboard Wireless Plug-In by WillAffleckUW · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is that for warganging? Driving on the open road, searching for unsecured WiFi ports?

    Now that would be sweet!

    --
    -- Tigger warning: This post may contain tiggers! --
  4. Reinventing the wheel by Quarters · · Score: 4, Interesting
    An OS level script that resizes a Photoshop document. That makes up for Photoshop's glaring lack of scripted/recorded actions that can be batched.

    Does Photoshop 1 even run under OS X 10.4?

    1. Re:Reinventing the wheel by jandrese · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yeah, but this way it can be combined with non-Photoshop operations. You could build a script to generate an index and filesystem with an integrated browser to build customized demonstration CDs.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    2. Re:Reinventing the wheel by Dink+Paisy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Photoshop can be driven by Javascript, VBscript and Applescript. Those aren't limited to Photoshop. Although, now that I think about it, the premise of Automator seemed to be that you could easily create scripts. So it's probably just using the existing scripting capability of Photoshop, but exposing it to users in a simpler package.

      --

      Whoever corrects a mocker invites insult;
      whoever rebukes a wicked man incurs abuse.
      --Proverbs 9:7
    3. Re:Reinventing the wheel by Ucklak · · Score: 2, Informative

      "...why you pay more for it"

      Pay more for what?

      CS is alot cheaper than the individual counterparts that make it.

      The Professional CS is $1200 with Photoshop, Illustrator, InDesign, Acrobat, GoLive.

      It used to be $700,$700,$500,$150,$100
      Half that for upgrades.

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
  5. a cursory glance reveals... by digitaldc · · Score: 2, Informative

    ....OmniGiraffe and CandyBar look cool, keep up the freeware and a big thank you to whoever offers it!

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
    1. Re:a cursory glance reveals... by robbieduncan · · Score: 2, Informative

      OmniGraffle is certainly not free. The Omni group offer a free trial, but it costs ~$80

  6. Re:Typical worthless crap by Bender0x7D1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There's more focus on it in the Mac world because they don't suck, they work properly and don't come preloaded with spyware.

    --
    Reading code is like reading the dictionary - you have to read half of it before you can go back and understand it.
  7. Prediction by chia_monkey · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In no time at all there are going to be a whole slew of Dashboard-centric sites, Automator-centric sites, Spotlight-centric sites, and so forth. Just like there are a myriad of PHP, Javascript, CSS, etc sties, we're going to see a bunch based solely on this new Mac OS.

    You gotta hand it to Apple. They create an entire industry around an iPod (don't you love how Belkin, once a patch cord company, makes loads of money off iPod accessories) and are now already sporting sites all over for an OS just recently (and in some places not even out yet) released.

    --

    "He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lampposts...for support rather than illumination." - Andrew Lang
  8. Or perhaps... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
  9. Re:Typical worthless crap by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 5, Funny

    I mean, seriously. How much Mac software is the equivalent of "faceplates for your cell phone?"

    Yeah I mean how many metadata plug-ins do we need to be able to search the text inside our prototyping, graphics, and organization applications. I mean this must be like the 50th time someone has provided a way for me to instantly search my system for tree diagrams in a proprietary format with particular text in them.

    Oh wait, no it isn't.

  10. apple store celebrates tiger by demon411 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    my roommate works at @pple store and she says it's open late from 8 to midnight for all u apple geeks to go gawk.

    1. Re:apple store celebrates tiger by As+Seen+On+TV · · Score: 2, Informative

      Your roommate got her facts wrong. Last time it was 8. The Tiger events start at 6 at all Apple stores (that's local 6, wherever you happen to be).

      Official company policy is that events end at midnight; you don't have to go home, but you can't stay here. In practice, the unofficial under-the-table policy to local store managers is, "Stay open until everybody's happy."

      At the "Night of the Panther" event in 2003, one store -- I can't remember which one, but I want to say it was one of the ones in Texas -- stayed open until 6:00 the next morning. They did more business that one night than they did the previous month.

      I wish I could remember which store that was. That's gonna bug me all day.

  11. Taking Advantage by vertinox · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Did anyone else misread the headline and think: "Oh no! They are releasing spyware for OS X!"

    *Phew!*

    Still, I'm hope they made sure that Automator is secure with Mail.app unlike vbscript and Outlook Express originally was. I'd rather not have my email being Automated to send certain things to everyone on my address book.

    --
    "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
    -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
  12. Thunderbird spotlight plugin PLEASE by Danathar · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I would LOVE to be able to search my mail with spotlight...but I can't yet find a thunderbird plugin....sadness overwhelms me

    1. Re:Thunderbird spotlight plugin PLEASE by Fabb · · Score: 3, Informative

      Spotlight's indexer has a file-level granularity.

      For Thunderbird messages to be indexed, searchable and retrievable, each message should be saved as an individual file.

      This is actually what Mail 2 does, and also what BeOS's mail did - you could set up live query folders that would hold mail messages based on your criteria. It's no coincidence that BFS' creator Dominic Giampaolo now works at Apple on Spotlight...

    2. Re:Thunderbird spotlight plugin PLEASE by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 2, Insightful

      For Thunderbird messages to be indexed, searchable and retrievable, each message should be saved as an individual file.

      You might want to mention that Thunderbird's version of the mbox format does not do this, instead one file is created for each mailbox. Unless this changes, it will not be easy to implement Spotlight searching on individual mail messages in Thunderbird.

      This is actually a potentially large failing in Spotlight. Being able to find the right file is a wonderful thing, but for really big files it would be much better to find a location within that file.

    3. Re:Thunderbird spotlight plugin PLEASE by As+Seen+On+TV · · Score: 4, Interesting

      There's an interesting story behind that.

      Nearly two years ago, we went to Microsoft's Mac BU and said, "We've got this new thing going on, and you're going to want to change the way Entourage stores its data." We told them all about Spotlight and how it indexes individual files and associates them with key-value attributes. We showed them the way we were redesigning Mail, and the workarounds we were going to employ for Address Book and iCal.

      Their response? "Meh."

      We fully expected to see a complete rewrite of the Entourage data format in Office 2004, but it didn't happen. Instead, Microsoft's guys said that they wanted to work with us to make Spotlight index their database.

      Well, that's really not what Spotlight's designed to do, see. It's not that we won't make it do that. It's just that that's now how it's designed to work.

      So now we have really excellent metadata importers for all the Office file formats ... except the Entourage database.

      Last I heard, we were still doing the back-and-forth with Microsoft. Not sure where that's going to end up.

    4. Re:Thunderbird spotlight plugin PLEASE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, I can see why "please spend a bunch of time to rewrite your storage format so it works better with our OS feature" isn't particularly high on the list for the Entourage folks. They store a lot of data in there- custom flags, custom searches, cross-references with other files, their new project management stuff for Office 2004, and so on. They already HAVE the "Gee Whizzy" things like smart folders that Spotlight has. Basically, what's being asked here is "spend time re-implementing what you already have so it's more compatible with the OS...meanwhile, we'll add features to OUR competitive clients (Mail and iCal) while you're off spending engineering man-hours doing that".

      Yeah, Spotlight is cool. But developers are also smart enough to remember that Apple has played Lucy with the football to developers' Charlie Brown. Quickdraw GX, anyone? Publish and Subscribe? OpenDoc? Or better yet, AIAT/V-Twin/SearchKit- which was Apple's pride and joy of searching and the Next! Cool! Thing! for search a couple of years ago? What if MS had spent time on that and now was being told, "oooh, sorry, not the cool thing any more"?

      The simple fact is that developers are wise to not just drink the goddamn Koolaid the OS manufacturer hands out at developer conferences(whether it's MS or Apple), but to consider what the right thing is for themselves and their customers. Sometimes, that means saying "no", or pushing back- if MS, Adobe and others hadn't pushed back in 1998, there'd be no Carbon, and likely Office, Photoshop and other core productivity apps would be Windows-only by now, because rewriting them in Cocoa or sticking them in Classic/Blue Box was a non-starter.

    5. Re:Thunderbird spotlight plugin PLEASE by As+Seen+On+TV · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well, I can see why "please spend a bunch of time to rewrite your storage format so it works better with our OS feature" isn't particularly high on the list for the Entourage folks.

      How about "please spend a bunch of time to rewrite your storage format so it doesn't completely implode if a single byte gets written incorrectly?" Or how about "please spend a bunch of time to rewrite your storage format so it doesn't crap out when it hits two gigabytes?"

      Or how about "please spend a bunch of time to rewrite your storage format in order to make your users happy?" That's my favorite.

      Or better yet, AIAT/V-Twin/SearchKit- which was Apple's pride and joy of searching and the Next! Cool! Thing! for search a couple of years ago?

      Um. You do know that Spotlight is basically Search Kit 2.0, right? It's based on, and is backwards compatible with, Search Kit.

    6. Re:Thunderbird spotlight plugin PLEASE by Chucker23N · · Score: 2, Informative

      "Quickdraw GX, anyone? Publish and Subscribe? OpenDoc?"

      You have a point, but exactly why did those technologies fail? Exactly, lack of developer adoption was one of the main reasons.

      "Or better yet, AIAT/V-Twin/SearchKit"

      SearchKit has been used from Mac OS 8 (8.5?) through 10.3, which spans over seven years (late 1997 to early 2005), so I don't see your complaint.

    7. Re:Thunderbird spotlight plugin PLEASE by Bob+Wehadababyitsabo · · Score: 2

      Who the hell are you? I've seen you post in every Apple related story as if you are Phil Schiller himself. Why should I believe you have a right to say the right to say the things you say instead of just being a karma whoring janitor at 1 Infinite Loop (assuming you work at 1IL at all). And if you are actually in a position to say what you do, why the hell are you posting on .\? Not meant to troll or flame, just want to be clear on your liberal use of "we".

      --
      fsck -u
    8. Re:Thunderbird spotlight plugin PLEASE by As+Seen+On+TV · · Score: 4, Informative

      "You applers?" Horrifying crimes against the English language aside, I'm not really sure I'm buying what you're selling here. In order for that to be true, the average size of each mail message would have to be less than 430 bytes. I don't think that's true.

      Here's how it works. The Mac OS Extended filesystem has a minimum allocation block size of four kilobytes. A one-byte file on disk will be given a minimum allocation of four kilobytes. Okay?

      Let's say your "mbox" file contains exactly 12,000 messages, and that it totals exactly 11,534,336 bytes. That means each message is an average of about 960 bytes long.

      On your Mac, those 960 byte files will be inflated to 4,096-byte files, because of the way Mac OS Extended allocates. That's a ratio of 4.27:1. Your mail store on your Mac will be 4.27 times larger than your mbox file.

      That means your mail store on your Mac will be 49,213,167 bytes, or about 47 MB. Even if you double that to account for the property-list metadata embedded with each message, that only comes to 94 MB. Not 105 MB.

      So I'm gonna go ahead and say that I don't really buy what you're selling.

      Now, setting that aside, your Mac requires considerably more than the 36 MB wasted inside your mail archive just for virtual memory paging. If you're in a situation where 36 MB makes a difference, you're doing something seriously wrong.

      How about a real-world example? I have an archive of 22,433 entirely average e-mail messages. On my Panther system disk, that archive occupies 876 MB. On my Tiger system disk, it occupies a grand total of 880 MB. A net loss to me of 4 MB of disk space, for a net gain of all the functionality of Spotlight.

      In the real world, e-mail messages are much closer to, or even significantly in excess of, 4 KB than they are in the case you described. And even in the case you described, the net difference is 36 MB, a totally insignificant sum in today's terms.

    9. Re:Thunderbird spotlight plugin PLEASE by Maserati · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I support products from both Apple and Microsoft:

      How about "please spend a bunch of time to rewrite your storage format so it doesn't completely implode if a single byte gets written incorrectly?" Or how about "please spend a bunch of time to rewrite your storage format so it doesn't crap out when it hits two gigabytes?"

      They actually DID the second one. Of course, a 2GB to 4GB improvement means somebody had been using a signed INT to index the database... I'll never understand why Microsoft is so fond of monolithic binary data stores (Registry, Entourage db etc.), the goddamn things break and can't really be fixed. Entourage 2004 does fuck up a LOT less than X did, but 2-4GB of binary data that could (should) be represented as text on disk (thank the person who advocated .mbox stores in Mail.app 1.0 for me) represents a lot of valuable data at risk because of a terrible design decision.It'd make a little more sense if Entourage used the same monolithic format Outlook or OE use, but they invented a new kind.

      I swear there's a corporate directive to go with monolithic stores wherever possible (for very large values of possible).

      No point, just a bad day at the office because Entourage and GroupWise don't get along.

      --
      Veteran, Bermuda Triangle Expeditionary Force, 1992-1951
  13. Can I put a tiger in my tank? by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 4, Funny
    I knew a guy in college who tried to take advantage of a tiger. They never did find all the bits.

    "Bloody zoos!" - Rick on The Young Ones

  14. Wikipedia Widget? by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 2, Interesting

    one word:
    sweet!

    --
    If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
  15. Re:Please don't flame me into oblivion but... by Nice2Cats · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Why is this on the front page of slashdot?

    To be honest, that was my first reaction, too. However: The little plugin thingies are going to be one of the first places where lots of people cut their teeth on programming. Apple is doing a certain amount of hand-holding here and provides some documentation and a great programming enviroment -- it got even better with Tiger. Since this site is for people who at least would like to pretend that they could code if they only had the time (ah, like me), it does make sense.

    One word of advice: If you ever have to ask a question that is critical about Apple on Slashdot, post as AC. Things that are considered normal, harmless questions or even humorous in other sections get trolled to death here. The "Cult of Mac", unfortunately, is not a joke.

  16. Which? by MoogMan · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wait, is this Mac OSX Tiger or TigerDirect? I'm confused...

    1. Re:Which? by Tsiangkun · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You can tell by all the support being given to users of this particular Tiger that it's not tiger direct.

  17. You bastards! by demonbug · · Score: 3, Funny
    "Third parties already taking advantage of Tiger"

    See, this is why I'm in favour of the two-party system; you just can't trust those third parties. Bunch of savages.

    Wait, what are we talking about again?
  18. Multiple OSes officially supported? by core · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Anyone knows if there's "official" support for partitioning the disk to support several versions of MacOS X? While I'd love to write code on Tiger (and must make sure my games work on it), I also need to support older versions. I know how to install multiple versions on the same Powerbook, just wondering if there's any known side effects or differences from a 'virgin' mac :P

    Cartoon-like miniature golf for Mac: http://www.funpause.com/gardengolf/

    1. Re:Multiple OSes officially supported? by As+Seen+On+TV · · Score: 4, Informative

      Sure, you can do that. You can do it from the installer. Each partition shows up to the operating system like a separate volume.

      One of the most important things we abandoned when evolving our operating system from Unix was the idea of separate, hidden partitions for things like virtual memory stores. All of Mac OS X runs on a single, user-visible partition. Which means you can trivially split your hard drive up into separate partitions and run different instances of Mac OS X on them.

    2. Re:Multiple OSes officially supported? by oneiros27 · · Score: 2, Informative

      About partitioning a hard disk

      Use Disk Utility to partition a disk into sections, or "volumes," each of which works like a separate disk. You might want to partition a disk so that you can have different versions of the Mac OS, or organize your information in a logical manner. To learn more about using Disk Utility, open Disk Utility, in the /Applications/Utilities folder, and choose Help > Disk Utility Help.

      That looks kinda official to me. (from the MacOS help)

      --
      Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
  19. NeoOffice/OpenOffice.org Spotlight Plugin by soullessbastard · · Score: 4, Informative

    One that probably isn't on the page may be the Spotlight plugin to allow for indexing of OpenOffice.org 1.x and NeoOffice formatted files. Unfortunately, I couldn't open source it prior to the Tiger release because the APIs were covered under NDA, but no longer!

    The NeoLight metadata importer is licensed under LGPL and illustrates basic parsing of OOo 1.x formatted documents using CoreFoundation XML utilities. It's still in development and could use some developers to lend a hand testing, optimizing, and determining if we're extracting all the relevant content properly.

    More information can be found in this trinity article.

    ed

    1. Re:NeoOffice/OpenOffice.org Spotlight Plugin by soullessbastard · · Score: 3, Informative

      I know the plugin right now successfully extracts most of the metadata people insert into "File > Properties" dialog as well as some of the other metadata (like last person editing the doc). The text extraction from Writer, Draw, Impress, and Calc documents is in place but I have been unable to verify if it's working properly. I'm hoping that the dev tools in the release will provide a better way to get a handle on what the metadata server is doing with the MDTextContent keys as earlier builds gave no feedback for text content, only read/write metadata keys.

      If you try it out, please give feedback in the NeoLight Development forum on trinity. While I know it's functional on prerelease builds, I haven't had the ability to check it on the release builds (my seeding key expired last Oct. prior to the newer Tiger builds).

      ed

  20. How Apple builds "community economies" by amichalo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It looks like even though Tiger has only been out a few hours, Apple is well on its way to building three more "community economies".

    I find it so interesting that the iPod (in all its flavors) and Mac mini have oodles of accessories for each.

    With Spotlight, Dashboard, and Automator all generating the software equvalent of these accessories, it seems appropriate to explore the "community economies" Apple is creating.

    Perhaps there is a better phrase than "community economies" to describe the markets that emerge from supporting a specific product as well as the communities that for from them (take for instance, iPod community websites). Whatever they may be called, it is interesting how Apple seems more capable than other manufacturers, even in other spaces, to develop these "community economies".

    But why is this becoming common for Apple products? Apple seems second only to automobile makers in creating accessory markets and communities of owners & supporters. The same doesn't exist for GAP or Sony or even Microsoft, though an argument can be made that the latter has a huge community of PC software vendors.

    But more than the vendors, it is the concept of little sub-economies and users so specific to a particular product that is very interesting to me.

    --
    I only came here to do two things; kick some ass, and drink some beer...looks like we're almost out of beer.
    1. Re:How Apple builds "community economies" by EnVisiCrypt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The problem is that it was a crap implementation.

      You do realize that it spawned a whole new javascript runtime for each widget, correct?

      I just don't know how they could be expected to purchase a "widget" software vendor when the only thing worth buying was the community's goodwill; the architecture itself was crap.

      Not only that, but Apple has had legal tangles with Arlo Rose in the past (A straight rip of the Aqua interface for his Kaleidoscope product). Most intelligent companies generally do not hop into bed with legal opponents (counter-examples exist).

      Read this for a much more cogent elucidation: http://daringfireball.net/2004/06/dashboard_vs_kon fabulator

      --


      *everything* is Orwellian to cats.
    2. Re:How Apple builds "community economies" by nullreference · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Good question.

      It's a self-reinforcing phenomenon. An existing strong community advocates for your products, and as long as you don't disappoint, it reinforces your product and community. Apple has such a strong and tight-knit community base, information and news tend to circulate quickly and thing get amplified. For instance, I've heard more about the Tiger release from Apple users than from Apple itself...

      It's questionable whether pure number or dollar-wise there are more Apple add-ons than say PCs. I would say not. For example I bet for every single 3rd party add-on (software or hardware-wise) for Macs there are probably two, three or more similar ones for PCs. It's just the one for the Mac gets quick circulation within the Apple community whereas the ones for the PC either compete against each other or are somewhat diluted in the multitude of options. I remember when I used my Macintosh heavily, it seemed like there was one and only one good app for every purpose. For windows there are dozens and sometimes they're all mediocre.

      As for cell phones, at least in this part of the US there are tons of add-ons -- face plates, blinking what-nots, games, etc -- although the market for those tend to be middle/high-school crowd. Again because of the shear number of cell phone models the community gets diluted. (I guess diluted community is an oxymoron).

  21. Re:A little offtopic, but.... by As+Seen+On+TV · · Score: 2, Informative

    We have wildly overstocked retail stores with copies of Tiger. We don't expect any of the stores to run out tonight.

    Seriously: wildly overstocked. Like you wouldn't believe.

  22. Re:100+ by As+Seen+On+TV · · Score: 2, Informative

    Nobody is forced to upgrade. Mac OS X 10.3 will continue to be supported. We just released Safari 1.3 with lots of enhancements last week, and we released QuickTime 7 with H.264 support for Panther this morning.

    If your sister wants great new features, she should buy the upgrade. If she doesn't, she shouldn't.

    Or, you know. You could be a really awesome brother and buy it for her. ;-)

  23. Not flaming, just offering an opinion... by Crash+Culligan · · Score: 4, Insightful
    One word of advice: If you ever have to ask a question that is critical about Apple on Slashdot, post as AC. Things that are considered normal, harmless questions or even humorous in other sections get trolled to death here. The "Cult of Mac", unfortunately, is not a joke.

    I could argue the "Cult of Mac" thing. The fact is, every group trolls here. Apple threads get Windows- and Linux-fanatics. BSD threads get "- is dying!" trolls like nobody's business. And SCO threads... well, in that case it's pretty much deserved. But nobody is spared. In a community this large, everybody hates something.

    It's just plain old garden-variety groupthink, where a lot of people receive a stimulus and respond similarly. It's not a cult, but it's just two or three steps removed.

    Now, as for the success of Apple on Slashdot... you need to go back a ways, but it wasn't always the way. Practically any thread mentioning Apple would attract its share of detractors, anonymous and virtiolic. Then something unforseen happened: Steve Jobs returned.

    Apple is doing a certain amount of hand-holding here and provides some documentation and a great programming enviroment -- it got even better with Tiger.

    I'm not really fan of Steve Jobs either, but I will admit that a (mostly) benevolent dictator is the best thing Apple could have gotten at the time. He challenged -- and changed -- computer culture, to the point that those silly looking triangular bubble-shaped iMacs that every "expert" at the time pooh-poohed still pop up in some clip-art collections.

    Over time, Apple apparently started doing some things right. Not everything, but enough to continue their survival. "Apple is dying!" went from troll's battle cry to last bastion of the hold-outs, and now where it's used, it's sarcastic. Even you admit in your post that they're doing some things correctly.

    In this case, the customizeability isn't quite programming, nor should it be. The fading of Hypercard from the public eye was enough warning that most people don't want to deal with programming. There's enough control under the hood on OS X that those people who want to can play with perl, python, ruby, c, c++, obj-c, java, emacs, vi, pico, php, etc. For the rest of them, there's this neat thing that does what they tell it -- programming in essence, but not in name. And that might make it easier for people to swallow.

    --
    You cannot truly appreciate Dilbert until you read it in the original Klingon.
  24. Re:I'm not a fucking troll, you idiot mods! by NekSnappa · · Score: 2, Informative

    Sure can! Just bop on over to iTunes, click to buy album. Enjoy!

    --
    I want to shoot the messenger!
  25. All signs point to yes. by teamhasnoi · · Score: 2, Informative
    http://www.automatorworld.com/
    http://www.dashboardlineup.com/
    http://www.iheartwidgets.com/
    http://www.thedashboarder.com/ (go easy on these guys, they're already being beaten to death.)

    In fact, several of these have been up for a couple of weeks. Has anyone else noticed that /. auto-links things now? Here's a test : http://dupedupedupe.net/

    Sweet! There goes what little HTML skillz I had!

  26. Re:TigerDirect? by russellh · · Score: 3, Funny

    P.S.- Just ordered the Mini a few minutes ago.

    Cool. Convertible?

    --
    must... stay... awake...
  27. Re:100+ by jocknerd · · Score: 4, Funny

    I just got my iBook G3 700mhz in October 2002. I've already bought Panther to put on it. I can't believe Apple wants me to pay for another upgrade. This is outrageous. I'm switching to Windows. At least then I don't have to buy another upgrade for 7 or 8 years.

  28. Microsoft has a huge community base by jocknerd · · Score: 2, Funny

    Spyware application vendors and anti-virus application vendors come to mind.

  29. I think that explains why iPods are so popular by SuperKendall · · Score: 2, Funny

    People are rushing to buy them before the company goes under!

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  30. Re:SuperKaramba by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 2, Insightful

    your a retard who cannot read.. both konfab and apple agree that dashboard may LOOK like konfab, but fundamentally they are different technologies.

    --



    I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  31. Perfect match... by Your+Average+Joe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There are at least two markets that Apple matches 100%
    1) The clueless Windows user that call the tower the hard drive.
    2) UNIX geeks that are tired of messing with Linux

    Windows gamers do not match. Windows gamers match 100% using an XBox or PS2 for gaming. They would save a bundle in hardware upgrades as well...

    --
    Your Average Joe
  32. Re:100+ by anonicon · · Score: 4, Funny

    "At least then I don't have to buy another upgrade for 7 or 8 years."

    You mispelled "download," "patches," and "days." ;-)

  33. Re:Custom Spotlight tag action? by As+Seen+On+TV · · Score: 2, Informative

    Custom metadata fields are not supported, except to the extent that each importer can define its own schema.

    Extended file system metadata is not going to be supported because it's not filesystem-agnostic. The idea is that we're going to broaden support for new filesystems, not restrict it.

    Spotlight is a search tool, not an asset-management database.

    Although, sooner or later someone will probably just write a plug-in that imports any extended file system metadata for any file.

    No, they won't, because attributes can't be defined at run-time. They're defined in a schema file that's a part of the importer package.

    Gonna say it again: Spotlight is a search tool, not a database.

  34. TigerDirect is also taking advantage by noidentity · · Score: 2, Funny

    of Apple's Tiger, and they were doing it a day before release!

  35. OS-Level Scripting is pure Unix; don't ignore. by CarpetShark · · Score: 4, Informative

    OS-Level scripting is absolutely NOT to be ignored. Amigas did it years ago with ARexx, and it was an incredibly powerful feature. In fact, I would go as far as to say that it's the GUI equivalent of Unix's small-but-pipeable-commands philosophy.

    I'm quite surprised that it's not universally supported on Unix machines now. Luckily, KDE at least does support it via DCOP and scripting APIs along with command line apps to access DCOP calls.

    To give a few quick examples:

    I recently discovered started using KDE's automatic wallpaper cycling for a given directory full of wallpapers. However, some wallpapers wouldn't suit my mood at a certain moment, and some wouldn't look as good on screen as they did when I downloaded them. So I figured I'd add some buttons to the panel: A red X for "Delete Wallpaper", and a forward arrow to switch to the next wallpaper. Implementing that took LESS than a MINUTE, since I just had to open a console, run "dcop", and see that kde exposes two helpful calls:

    kdesktop KBackgroundIface changeWallpaper
    and kdesktop KBackgroundIface currentWallpaper

    The first command was added directly to the next wallpaper button, and the second was added to a short script that uses it to get the wallpaper name, changes to the next wallpaper, then deletes the old one.

    As another example, I have a quick little script that finds my currently playing song in whatever KDE music player I happen to be using via dcop, without the need for specially made command line tools that access the players API, such as xmms provides.

    The real power comes when you want to do things like connecting a 3D rendering app to a photo manipulation app, followed by lipsync tool and a final movie encoder.

    ARexx was doing things like this years ago, and it's perfectly possible (and implemented!) on Linux today. It's just a shame more people aren't aware of and using it. We're ignoring potential power, as if we all used DOS and continued to claim that Unix command line functionality was pointless and unnecessary. Maybe when we use Unix the way it CAN be used, we'll finally have a killer app that puts the secrecy of windows' proprietary apps to shame.

    At the very least, I would ask people not to insult OS X for finally implementing this important feature. They seem to have done it in an innovative GUI-based way, too.

  36. Re:Apple doesn't do its trademark searches very we by EvilAndrew · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wouldn't hold your breath on Onyx doing an OS X version anytime soon.

    I was the original author of Spotlight, and they haven't developed the IP much from the original version I sold them (I'd sold it because I was busy creating CrossBasic at the time, which was eventually renamed to RealBasic).

    In fact they went so far as to threaten me with legal action a couple of years ago, when I started to develop a Mac OS X equivalent, even though the non-compete provision had expired.

  37. Re:Please don't flame me into oblivion but... by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 2, Insightful

    To be honest, that was my first reaction, too. However: The little plugin thingies are going to be one of the first places where lots of people cut their teeth on programming.

    The original summary mentioned sites providing three types of third-party software to take advantage of tiger. Both automator scripts and dashboard widgets are great for quick and fast small tasks that can be easily distributed and used. They are great for really really quick or small operations and will be great for adding customized functionality for many people.

    That said, I don't think either is very important compared to the third item, spotlight plug-ins. This is new and real filesystem level functionality being extended by third parties. If this happened in Windows, Linux, Solaris, or NachOS it would be on the front page of Slashdot, and rightly so. A single day after the OS was released, thanks to dozens software developers, a user of tiger can instantaneously search their entire system based upon the contents of all sorts of file types. Apple allowing this for fifty or so very common data types is great, but the fact that people have already provided plug-ins to let my searches extend to OpenOffice files, Omnigraffle diagrams, Realbasic projects, Corel Painter Files, VOIP logs, and many more proprietary file types really makes me think that this technology will be used and extended to the point that it will really, really change the way I use my computer on a fundamental level. This is, as far as I know, the first time this sort of thing was possible on any system although I have no doubt that it will be embraced by every consumer OS within a few years time.

    This is definitely "News for Nerds."

  38. Search Kit 2? by guet · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Search Kit can index multiple things within a single file.

    Can Spotlight?

    If not, why not?

    Frankly I think your hostility to the Mac BU (and by extension anyone who questions this 'feature') is misplaced. Why should every mail application (or other application) have to change their storage format to a single file per object?

    If this is the case, this is a gap in the Spotlight API, and a step backwards from Search Kit - it would not be backwards compatible. If it is backwards compatible you can indeed index several things in one file (I know because I'm doing it presently with search kit).

    You can add arbitrary URLS (ie an url scheme of your devising) with :

    SKDocumentCreateWithURL

    Then add text to be indexed with :

    SKIndexAddDocumentWithText

    I haven't looked at the Spotlight API so I couldn't tell you if this is the case with Spotlight, but everyone seems to be saying that you need to feed it a file URL for each object searched. Perhaps because of the tie in with the operating system to see when files have changed.

    BTW, your posts are very interesting, and I'm glad you post here, but you do sometimes give the impression of talking as 'the voice of Apple' on all subjects. Is this intentional? You can't possibly know about everything Apple does.