Slashdot Mirror


Firefox Breaks 50,000,000 Barrier

MrDrBob writes "Today at 16:59 GMT (8:58 AM PST) Mozilla Firefox received its 50,000,000th download. To celebrate, SpreadFirefox.com has created a special page, where you can watch the downloads continue to climb in real time. Three cheers for Firefox! May it go on swiftly to 100,000,000!"

31 of 359 comments (clear)

  1. Rumor has it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    That if they reach 100 million downloads in the next four days, Blake Ross will fly to the moon under his own power.

    1. Re:Rumor has it by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Funny
      That if they reach 100 million downloads in the next four days, Blake Ross will fly to the moon under his own power.

      I think Bill Gates would volunteer to fly him there.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  2. Time zones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Today at 16:59 GMT (8:58 AM PST) ..."

    *blink*

    1. Re:Time zones by nharmon · · Score: 4, Funny

      You didn't know GMT and PST were off 8 hours and 1 second?

  3. Downloads per user by r_glen · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So how many unique users does that translate to? Anyone with a reasonable estimate?

    1. Re:Downloads per user by MarkByers · · Score: 4, Informative

      Seeing as I am downloading it directly from portage, this will not be counted by their download counter. I guess that many of the other posters have forgotten this and have probably underestimated the number of unique users by excluding most Linux users.

      --
      I'll probably be modded down for this...
    2. Re:Downloads per user by Given+M.+Sur · · Score: 4, Informative

      Why do so many Gentoo users get this confused.

      Gentoo does not host the packages that you download. They host the ebuilds and the ebuilds tell portage where to download the packages from.

      So, you downloaded it directly from mozilla. Check the ebuild yourself if you don't believe me.

      --
      nil
    3. Re:Downloads per user by Finsterwald+P+Ogleth · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I think Asa had a blog entry on this...

      The download counter only counts "foreign" browsers (like IE, or Opera), or Versions before 1.0.

      If you download a new installer with a current (1.0 or >) version, it won't count.

      There goes most of the theories about counts surmised above...

      We're probably seeing a realistic download count for unique users for non-current versions...

      FPO

  4. Small nit to pick... by pegr · · Score: 5, Interesting

    On four different machines sitting in front of me, the counter is off by about 500 between the lowest and the highest. \

    While the counter is cute, I'd call it a bogometer. :)

    1. Re:Small nit to pick... by geeber · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I also like how the counter increments at constant regular intervals. Seems like firefox is being downloaded precisely once every second.

      I would hardly seems like it could be the actual number in real time.

    2. Re:Small nit to pick... by br0ck · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Look at the js source, it increments each second, but it uses XMLHttpRequest to look up and correct to the actual value once per minute.

      http://www.spreadfirefox.com/ffcounter.js

    3. Re:Small nit to pick... by _xeno_ · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you look at the source, you'll see that it is actually pulling a real number from an RSS feed.

      It then defaults to 2 downloads a second, incrementing the timer by that rate every second. When it grabs the feed again a minute later, it then uses the "real" rate of downloads from the first grab to the second grab and starts incrementing by that amount.

      It then continues to do that for as long as the page is up.

      So the number is real-ish.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
  5. Swim... by nacturation · · Score: 4, Funny

    Does this mean Stallman will swim across the Atlantic 50 times?

    --
    Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    1. Re:Swim... by clem · · Score: 5, Funny

      That would constitute a bath, so I'm afraid it's out of the question.

      --
      Your courageous and selfless spelling corrections have made me a better person.
  6. Now by jb.hl.com · · Score: 4, Funny

    Swim that fucking ocean, bitch!

    Erm, wrong browser. Whoops.

    --
    By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
  7. To be fair.... by ActionJesus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I have downloaded firefox like 30 times. Due to installs, re-installs, upgrades, downgrades, and just for the hell of it, it mounts up. Not to say this isnt an achievement... one of my progects is currently on about 50 downloads, after 3 years. But still, I'd like to see more concrete numbers than downloads. Gratz, ffox :)

  8. Just remember by computerme · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I have download it 3 times for the same machine.

    (1.0. - 1.0.3)

    I am sure others have done the same.

    I got a cold splash in the face last week when i told my client they should be using firefox. They responed "what's firefox"

    Its a little too early to break out the "IE is dead" champagne...

    I hope it will happen someday but there is much more work to be done.

  9. Slightly Inflated? by PocketPick · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The large amount of downloads are great, but how many of those downloads simply were the same users downloading updates: v1.0, v1.0.1, v1.0.2 and v1.0.3? I'd be interested in knowing how many of those downloads correspond to unique users. After all, that's really what is most important.

  10. Celebrate--giving their history.... by FerretFrottage · · Score: 4, Funny

    I would have expected them to change the name after 50,000,000 downloads.

    --
    "Look Lois, the two symbols of the Republican Party: an elephant, and a fat white guy who is threatened by change."
  11. slashdotted already (article text) by h4ter · · Score: 5, Funny

    50,037,604
    50,037,605
    50,037,606
    50,037,607
    50,037,608
    50,037,609
    50,037,610
    50,037,611
    50,037,612
    50,037,613
    50,037,614

  12. In Internet Explorer by bobbis.u · · Score: 4, Interesting

    And it can't be a coincidence that the page doesn't display properly in Internet Explorer!!

    1. Re:In Internet Explorer by El+Cubano · · Score: 4, Informative

      And it can't be a coincidence that the page doesn't display properly in Internet Explorer!!

      Look here. This Page Is Valid XHTML 1.0 Strict! No conspiracy theories around here. Valid HTML is difficult to get looking right in IE.

  13. Hey, it says "actual number"--so it has to be! by Black+Perl · · Score: 5, Informative

    I just saw the counter go down. Cool, they're even counting "returns".

    Actually, the javascript only updates once a minute, and when it does, it computes a new rate, so the increments you see are only estimates until the next update.

    --
    bp
  14. Firefox does not 'auto update' by Yankel · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've updated FireFox on my in-law's Window's box three times now. Each time, the 'upgrade' consisted of downloading the new install executable to the desktop and running it.

    The new installation overwrites the old one, keeping your various settings (history, bookmarks, etc.) in tact.

    It would be interesting to find out how many of those downloads were resulting from the upgrade prompt (red arrow). Hopefully, that's already been factored in.

    --
    --- Dan
  15. Re:Does this include yesterday by asa · · Score: 5, Informative

    We're not counting downloads served by the Firefox update system. Neither are we counting the millions of downloads from download.com (they actually host Firefox as well) or from other download repositories. We're also not counting people who go directly to FTP without going through our "bouncer" tool (the app that directs you to the most appropriate mirror). There's lots we're not counting here. It's not meant to be a count of users. It's just a measure of how many people use our system to download Firefox.

    - A

  16. We have identified this user ? by thrill12 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Uh oh, Firefox has instantaneously tracked down the user that clicked for the 50th million download ?

    Along with coin #1 in the series, we are also awarding a very special prize--the biggest we've ever given out--to the lucky SpreadFirefox affiliate who delivered the golden click that went with the 50 millionth download. We have identified this person and will withhold her information until she accepts the prize. Check back early next week!

    I wonder how they did it...
    ---

    Return-path: 50thmillionfirefox@mpaa.com
    Received: from catchthepirate.mpaa.com
    Received: from mail.mpaa.com
    Received: from some.isp.com

    Subject: Firefox 50th million download

    Hi, we are from spreadfirefox.com and have identified the 50th million firefox downloader as coming from ip UUU.XXX.YYY.ZZZ.
    Please give us his/her name and address so we can contact him/her to give them this prize !

    Thank you in advance,

    Firefox team

    --
    Slashdot: stuff for news, nerds that matter, matter for news, stuff that nerd
    1. Re:We have identified this user ? by asa · · Score: 4, Informative

      We're not celebrating the person who made the download. We're celebrating the community and the specific community member who helped deliver that new user to Firefox. See the affiliate program at SpreadFirefox.com http://www.spreadfirefox.com/

      - A

  17. Re:Are all versions of Firefox included? by asa · · Score: 5, Informative

    I should add a minor correction, that page lists the current version, so if you got 1.0, 1.0.1, or 1.0.2 from similar links, you'll also be counted. All those links go through our mirror tool that distributes load across our dozens of mirrors. We're not counting downloads that don't go through that tool.

    - A

  18. Re:What does it mean ? by asa · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Jules, a big point that you're missing is that this is a celebration for that community of active participants who have helped Firefox achieve these downloads. Are open source projects supposed to discourage their communities from celebrating milestones?

    - A

  19. Re:It's Good to be the King by maotx · · Score: 4, Informative

    Does anyone actually know how many visits slashdot gives a site that is on posted on the front page? any guesses?

    The guy who did the Christmas and Haloween lights prank did a rather nice analysis on the incoming bandwidth from Slashdot and other media sites.

    Pasted below is Slashdot's statistics:

    5 min: 781
    10 min: 1,604
    1 hour: 11,699
    2 hours: 21,651
    4 hours: 35,895
    8 hours: 53,720
    24 hours: 90,607
    2 days: 94,830
    week: 98,054
    month: 117,210

    Take it with a grain of salt though...the analysis might be another hoax ;)

    --
    I'm a virgo and on Slashdot. Coincidence? Yes.
  20. Re:Harder #s? by Jason+Earl · · Score: 4, Informative

    This is what OneStat has to say.