Slashdot Mirror


The Chimera Dilemma Manifested in Sheep

Rollie Hawk writes "While many limits on stem cell research exist in the United States, scientist are finding wants to straddle or at least blur the line between man and animal. It's not quite The Island of Doctor Moreau, but it's bringing a pantheon of ethical dilemmas, nonetheless. The creation of chimeras, named for the mythical beast composed of parts from several different animals, has been in the news off and on for the last few months. The latest case involves around 50 sheep said to possess at least partially human organs. These heavily modded sheep are growning human-like organs such as livers, hearts, and blood. All of these could eventually be close enough to the real thing to be harvested as replacements parts. If that doesn't shock you, consider one other human organ that is being grown in some of these sheep: human brains. While it is doubtful that anyone would want a brain transplant from a human-sheep chimera, it does hold the possibility for doing brain research that would never be allowed on human beings. That is, unless, the brains end up being too human. Just the possibility of a human mind bouncing around inside a sheep's head is a scary proposition."

68 of 433 comments (clear)

  1. A problem? by gatorflux · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, the wife never complained when she found I was part horse.

    1. Re:A problem? by mobby_6kl · · Score: 2, Funny

      My wife, on the other hand, always complains that I'm part pig.

      Just kidding of course, I don't have a g/f let alone a wife!

    2. Re:A problem? by Directrix1 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't deceive people, you're an ass.

      --
      Occam's razor is the blind faith in the natural selection of least resistance and in universal oversimplification. -- EF
    3. Re:A problem? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
      Well, the wife never complained when she found I was part horse.

      With a retainer and braces, you could have a beautiful smile in no time.

    4. Re:A problem? by mikefe · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, the wife never complained when she found I was part horse.

      Was that after you smiled or when you started talking?

      --
      There: Something at a specific location.
      Their: Owned by someone.
      Please make sure your english compiles.
    5. Re:A problem? by vistic · · Score: 2, Funny

      oh my gawwwwwwwwwwwwwwd........ youre a brooooooooom?

      to be honest diane, i was surprised.

  2. "Heavily modded sheep" by Elius+I · · Score: 4, Funny

    What has the world came to?

    1. Re:"Heavily modded sheep" by suitepotato · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Man, like I had that baby just flyin' along doing all sorts of algorithms, and doing Quake, and man... You would not believe the kind of stuff you can do with a modded sheep."

      "Yeah, I was like, takin' mine down Central Ave. and this cop, he just came outta nowhere, man. He could not even keep up, and its a real good thing I put the air dam on the rear end, cause the tail kept flyin' up and I hit the hill at Brisco, and nearly lost it totally."

      "Modded" was a bad choice of words. Now I have images of blue neon trim and all sorts of flashy bling bling on the farm...

      --
      If my grammar and spelling are off, I am [distracted/tired/careless] (take your pick)
    2. Re:"Heavily modded sheep" by Rei · · Score: 4, Interesting

      What the article *doesn't* mention is that if you poke the sheep enough, they'll explode on you.

      On a more serious note, was anyone else distrubed by the fact that it was recommended, concerning human-brained mice, that they monitor for signs of humanlike behavior in human-brained mice, and if they find such behavior, they were to... immediately kill the mice? Excuse me? If a mouse is starting to think like a person, shouldn't the appropriate response be to cease testing, ensure a good life for it, and only euthanize it if there are signs that it is suffering?

      --
      Dear Lord: One of your creatures may be hurt tonight. Please let it be the other creature.
    3. Re:"Heavily modded sheep" by FuturePastNow · · Score: 2, Informative

      Universities have been case-modding cows for ages. This has the benefit of producing some truly odd pictures. Plus, cows are dumb.

      But sheep with human brains? How long until we have to tell farm animals to quit their jibber-jabberin'?*

      *If you didn't get that, be thankful.

      --
      Give a man fire, and you warm him for the night. Set a man on fire, and you warm him for the rest of his life.
    4. Re:"Heavily modded sheep" by zepmaid · · Score: 3, Funny

      OK. have the sheep been modded +5 Insightful or -1 Troll??

    5. Re:"Heavily modded sheep" by Generalisimo+Zang · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You're right. In a humane world, if people discovered a sheep with a human mind, they'd treat it well... as if it were a person. Unfortunately, we live in THIS world... where even actual humans have a hard time getting treated as if they were people. *sigh*

  3. Didn't we already do that? by ericdano · · Score: 4, Funny

    Haven't we done that? Timothy is a living example of a Sheep grown brain transplanted into a human ;-)

    --
    It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
    I moderate therefore I rule!
    --
  4. Cannibalism by NoseBag · · Score: 2, Funny

    I've seen several versions of this article recently, and have been resisting (until..uh..now) asking a question:

    If I slaughter and eat one of the sheep am I guilty of cannibalism?

    --
    Cloned foods give the statement "We had that last week!" a whole new meaning.
    1. Re:Cannibalism by Abm0raz · · Score: 4, Funny

      better question: should Welshmen start to be charged with rape when they bugger them?

      -Ab

      --
      Nothing fails quite like prayer.
    2. Re:Cannibalism by RichardX · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is what it would do to you, as far as I know

      --
      Curiosity was framed. Ignorance killed the cat.
    3. Re:Cannibalism by TexNex · · Score: 2, Funny

      "better question: should Welshmen start to be charged with rape when they bugger them?" No, but we may just see a statistical rise in Welsh children saying Da-aaaa-dy.

    4. Re:Cannibalism by SunFan · · Score: 2, Funny


      I don't know, but the pillow talk certainly is much better, now.

      - Anonymous Sheep Herder

      --
      -- Microsoft is the most expensive commodity operating system and office suite vendor in the marketplace.
  5. Human brain? by Andrewkov · · Score: 3, Funny

    I thougt I got picked on at school .. At least I didn't have a sheep's body! Joking aside, can you imagine a sheep with almost human intelligance? Man, that is freaky. Perfect fodder for horror movies, though.

    1. Re:Human brain? by TopShelf · · Score: 2, Funny

      Just imagine the commercial possibilites, should they succeed...

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    2. Re:Human brain? by I_Human · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sure the sheep has a "human" brain, but that wont necessarily make it human-like. Classic nature vs nurture, and I think for it to be more human-like we have to look at the sheeps nurturing. I suppose the human-brained sheep would be akin to feral children and not show much more than just the animal that they are. Interesting to think about anyway.

      --
      -JP
    3. Re:Human brain? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe this is the time we start to re-examine how we treat other animals.

      Absolutely. For example, there must be new sauces that can be developed.

    4. Re:Human brain? by cortana · · Score: 2, Funny

      Considering how stupid most people are, I'm not too worried.

  6. Hard to Imagine... by Herkum01 · · Score: 3, Funny

    That Skittles got to this story first. FYI: Skittles has been playing a commercial with two sheep with human heads are eating Skittles. They comment on how they could manage to cross two completely different flavors into one candy.

  7. Why is this scary? by pyth · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Because it's new? Are you a luddite?

    1. Re:Why is this scary? by Erris · · Score: 2, Insightful
      It's scary because the law does not provide protection for the possible creation. Imagine yourself trapped in a sheep's body. You were litterally raised in a barn, never clothed and left to sleep in your own shit. While you can never articulate your feelings, you might be very upset. You would certainly be upset to know that your owner could kill and eat you.

      It's one thing to grow human bones, muscles and organs. That can get creepy enough if done by harvesting and supressing what would have otherwise grown into a whole person. Growing human brains is something that's always creepy unless it's done in a free and legally protected body. It would also be cruel to create a limited, crippled or painful body such as a sheep for that human brain. It is unethical to take risks for others you would not be willing to take yourself or without their consent.

      --
      DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
    2. Re:Why is this scary? by mrchaotica · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What we need is a lot more understanding of the developmental process (i.e., the "nature/nurture" problem). Would a human-brained sheep feel like a "human trapped in a sheep's body," or feel like a sheep? If it didn't feel like a human, would it realize it was different from other sheep? A lot of what separates us from the rest of the animals is language; if it never had the opportunity to learn a language (assuming sheep don't have one) would it realize the possibility existed?

      Speaking of language and "humanity", which is more human: a human raised by wolves or an ape that's learned sign language? When we understand that, we'll understand the ethics of chimeras.

      --

      "[Regarding the 'cloud,'] ownership was what made America different than Russia." -- Woz

  8. Bioethics by geomon · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Two researchers were discussing this topic on Science Friday last week.

    The thing that kept running through my mind as I listened to the discussion was how someone with enough money could run circles around these ethics panels and produce chimeras off-shore.

    Now that Bush has made the political (rather than scientific) decision to limit stem cell lines, this activity will most certainly occur outside of the US and beyond any jurisdiction of American ethics organizations.

    --
    "Rocky Rococo, at your cervix!"
    1. Re:Bioethics by FidelCatsro · · Score: 4, Insightful

      For a politican there is normaly two criteras ,
      #1: Fiscal(who bribed/lobied(same word really) me the most)
      #2: Ethical(If I do this , will i get voted out next term and be unable to recive #1)

      politicans generaly have all the ethics of 51% of the votes and the largest cash pay off.

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    2. Re:Bioethics by Rich0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      He made his decision as a nod to the conservative wing of his party.

      What ethical reason would there be for denying individuals the medical advances that come from stem cell research?

      Uh, why exactly do you think that the conservative wing of his party opposes stem cell research? For ethical reasons!

      Sure, many people may disagree with the ethical judgement being made, but the decision is purely ethical. What other motivation would they have? Do you think that they're doing it just so that they can watch people with various diseases die?

      In this case the ethical dilema is whether it is OK to destroy embryos to harvest their stem cells. What makes it a dilema is that it is strongly debated whether embryos are fully entitled to human rights. In fact, that is not all that different from the debate about putting human brains in sheep - is that enough to make a being with human rights? (Whoa, and suddenly we're back on-topic...)

      Just because you don't happen to agree with the ethics of the situation doesn't mean that it isn't an ethical decision.

      A decision to ban all animal research would also be an ethical decision, and one that many people would disagree with, but which many would also agree with.

      Unfortunately, ethical problems will only be straightfoward when everybody else gets with it and just agrees that I'm the only one who really knows what is right and wrong... :)

    3. Re:Bioethics by sas-dot · · Score: 2, Interesting

      NewYork times had a detailed sunday magazine article on Apr 10 . (now you have to pay to read this) The article included about the politics among scientists behind this research. I quote few of them below, including the most bizzare possiblity!

      ..For several years, Brivanlou, a 45-year-old developmental biologist at Rockefeller University in New York, has been arguing that one of the best ways to understand the usefulness of stem cells for regenerative medicine is to first insert them in an animal embryo and see how they divide and differentiate in a living system. The experiment is explicitly prohibited by the institutions that supply the stem-cell lines approved by the Bush administration, so he is using private funds to develop his own lines. He plans to insert them into 3-to-5-day-old mouse embryos, which he will then implant in the wombs of female mice. Brivanlou is anxiously awaiting the publication of the National Academy of Sciences guidelines before proceeding, but he says he doubts that they will prove an impediment. In his view, showing the potency of stem cells only in a petri dish is like testing the power of a new car by revving its engine in the garage. He wants to take the car out on the track and see how it might perform some day on the open road.

      ....
      Robert Lanza, vice president for medical and scientific development at Advanced Cell Technology in Worcester, Mass., says much the same thing. ''I personally don't want to engage in those kinds of experiments, and I won't have any of my scientists do that work,'' he says. ''Sure, we could reach our endpoints quicker that way. But it takes you into very murky water.''

      Why all the shuddering? For starters, there is the gonad quandary. If the experiment really works, the human cells should differentiate into all of the embryo's cell lineages, including the one that eventually forms the animal's reproductive cells. If the mouse were male, some of its sperm might thus be human, and if it were female, some of its eggs might be human eggs. If two such creatures were to mate, there would be a chance that a human embryo could be conceived and begin to grow in a mouse uterus -- a sort of Stuart Little scenario, but in reverse and not so cute.

      ''Literally nobody wants to see an experiment where two mice that have eggs and sperm of human origin have the opportunity to mate and produce human offspring,'' says Dr. Norman Fost, professor of pediatrics and director of the bioethics program at the University of Wisconsin and a member of the National Academy of Sciences committee reviewing stem-cell research policies. ''That's beyond anybody's wildest nightmare.''

      Is the concern over the reproductive issue overblown? It is, of course, biologically impossible for a human fetus to be delivered from a rodent uterus. Moreover, for a human embryo to be conceived, the chimeras would have to be born first in order to mate, and Brivanlou says he has no intention of allowing them to come to term. He plans to terminate them and examine the fate of the human cells after a week. Still, there remains the question of what kind of being would be present during those seven days. Nobody knows. Does even the fleeting, prenatal existence of a chimera of unknown aspect cross a moral line -- not because of what it might look like or become but simply for what it is?

    4. Re:Bioethics by dasqua · · Score: 2, Insightful

      considering guantanamo bay, the Bush US gov seems to like putting things outside their jurisdiction.

      why should this be any different?

      --
      tihs isg mead fmro rcecydle tpyos
  9. It does explain a lot though by Weaselmancer · · Score: 4, Funny

    While it is doubtful that anyone would want a brain transplant from a human-sheep chimera

    It would explain how the Patriot Act and the DCMA got passed.

    Ba dump bump! Thanks, I'll be here all week. Be sure to tip your waitresses.

    --
    Weaselmancer
    rediculous.
  10. That's *COOL* by fazil · · Score: 4, Interesting


    Human brains in sheep? Now that's just plain *COOL* Hacking the genes.. loads of fun!

    I don't know why so many people get upset about this kind of thing.. I mean, if my mom had something like CJD from eating euro-beef 10 years ago, and you could sacrifice a legion of humo-sheep hybrid brains to save her.. Sacrifice away! Myself, I have a damaged heart.. if I could have a new one, I'd kill any number of chimera sheep to get it. I want to watch my boy grow up, not die at 35. Oh, and you go tell that hypotetical burn victim why he'll be deformed for the rest of his life, because he can't have the artificial skin developed from chimera sheep in Qwai Pong Province china, because his narrow minded government doesn't think it's ethical.

    In the balance of life, they're sheep. Who cares? Grow them in vats for all I care. As long as this is all done in a clean room environment, so we can minimize the risk of having superbug's crossing the sheep human barrier...

    --
    -=-Ze End-=-
    1. Re:That's *COOL* by dj_segfault · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think cuz brains is different.

      If an animal had a human brain, with something approaching human intellect (could you have usefil human-like brains without human-like intellect>), the the list of what is cruel to do to them and what is not has to move more towards the human end of the spectrum.

      In fact, it might be cruel simply to have a creature with our level of intelligence but without the ability to do anything with it. It would be like shoving a kid in solitary for their whole life. Clearly they would go crazy in short order. That's what really bored humans with too little stimulation do.

      ----
      Abbey.... normal?

    2. Re:That's *COOL* by mikael · · Score: 2, Informative

      In fact, it might be cruel simply to have a creature with our level of intelligence but without the ability to do anything with it. It would be like shoving a kid in solitary for their whole life. Clearly they would go crazy in short order. That's what really bored humans with too little stimulation do.


      Actually, when wild animals used to large territories are placed in caged captivity (polar bears, lions, tigers etc...) they usually do go mad.


      Have you seen animals pacing up and down endlessly in their cages or biting at their bars; twisting their necks or rolling heads; vomiting or hurting themselves? All these are symptoms of animals being driven mad because of captivity. This madness, called 'stereotype behaviour' is caused due to removal of animals from their natural habitat, frustration, boredom, lack of life in normal social groups, excessive human control and no control on self. Caged big cats will often pace the same path again and again. Great apes and elephants may rock, sway or shift repeatedly from side to side. Other disturbed behaviour may include licking the walls and chewing the bars of their pens. The startling thing is that most of the animals in the zoos suffer from this terrible syndrome.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    3. Re:That's *COOL* by johnnyb · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "In the balance of life, they're sheep."

      Based on what exactly?

      Why is it ethical to do this with sheep/humans, but not ethical to do this with humans (and if you don't think this is coming, people have proposed created brainless humans for the purpose of harvesting organs).

      At what point is a chimera no longer human?

      I find it really amusing that people on this board are so willing to go for it. I'm cynically guessing this is the same crowd that is morally outraged because people send unwanted email without looking at the consequences on our network infrastructures.

  11. Won't make a real human. by logicnazi · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Just injecting some human brain cells into a sheep or even transplanting an early human brain from a fetus is unlikely to produce any kind of human sheep. The human brain doesn't just develop from a genetic blueprint but also requires a huge amount of deveelopmental cues and responds to hormones and signaling molecules (like sonic the hedgehog) to develop properly. Not to mention a host of enviornmental stimuli needed to encourage the brain to wire itself correctly.

    In short it isn't just human neurons which make us human but the whole brain development system at work in babies. This isn't the sort of thing which could be duplicated in a sheep without extensive genetic modification or hand controlling all the developmental signals. If this is possible at all it is far beyond our current level of technology.

    So don't get freaked out yet people. They are just growing human neurons in sheep at the moment there is no chance we will make a person trapped in a sheep body.

    God damn these popular stories can be misleading.

    --

    If you liked this thought maybe you would find my blog nice too:

    1. Re:Won't make a real human. by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 4, Funny

      I agree. It's shear lunacy.

      --
      "I only speak the truth"
      Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
  12. sheep with human brains by Tumbleweed · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Liiisssaaaa, don't eeeaaatttt meeeeee."

    If you kill it, it'll stop creeping you out by talking. :)

    Anyone remember the song, "Cows With Guns"?

  13. Uhhh by quantaman · · Score: 5, Interesting

    the committee recommended closely monitoring the mice's behavior and immediately killing any that display human-like behavior.

    You know when considering a solution to that particular ethical dilemma that wasn't the first idea that came to mind...

    --
    I stole this Sig
  14. Re:Nah, not scary by flewp · · Score: 3, Funny

    Just try and let that freak sheep mutant get near me with my opposable thumbs and a large caliber handgun.

    --
    WWJD.... for a Klondike bar?
  15. Same thing we do every night... by jpatters · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Stanford law professor Hank Greely, who chaired the ethics committee, said the board was satisfied that the size and shape of the mouse brain would prevent the human cells from creating any traits of humanity. Just in case, Greely said, the committee recommended closely monitoring the mice's behavior and immediately killing any that display human-like behavior."

    OK, I can just see it now:

    "Same thing we do every night, Pinky, try to take over the" [splat!]

    --
    "Remember, there never were pineapple-almond cookies here."
  16. Pop-science reporting is fun by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's always fun to see how the reporters particular bias will come accross.

    He can't wait to examine the effects of the human cells he had injected into the fetus' brain about two months ago. "It's mice on a large scale," Chamberlain says with a shrug. As strange as his work may sound, it falls firmly within the new ethics guidelines

    They've allready painted him as a mad scientist, eagerly rubbing his hands together in glee over having fought Gods plan. All the while shrugging his shoulders at the cocern of the good people of the world.

    --
    Everything will be taken away from you.
  17. Skittles: Taste the creepy rainbow by Scrameustache · · Score: 3, Funny

    That Skittles got to this story first. FYI: Skittles has been playing a commercial with two sheep with human heads are eating Skittles.

    Available on their site, quicktime or windows media: Taste the sheep boys.

    I miss the beautifull surreal skittle ads, the creepifying ones don't make me want to eat their stuff: I might get the same horrible nightmare vision they do.

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  18. I know! by ggvaidya · · Score: 3, Funny

    Why isn't this in the hardware section?

    Stupid editors ...

    1. Re:I know! by ZephyrXero · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Could possibly go in the "Your Rights" section too. All those people who were afraid of genetic stuff aren't sounding quite as crazy now...

      --
      "A truly wise man realizes he knows nothing."
  19. As the fine folk at fark.com observed... by wfberg · · Score: 5, Funny

    Injecting human DNA into sheep is nothing new to lonely shepherds..

    --
    SCO employee? Check out the bounty
  20. Sheep with human brain by konkani · · Score: 2, Funny

    In Soviet Russia, the sheep count you!

    --
    please change me. - sig
  21. That can't be right... by OmgTEHMATRICKS · · Score: 2

    Just in case, Greely said, the committee recommended closely monitoring the mice's behavior and immediately killing any that display human-like behavior. If they DO start behaving like humans and have vastly increased intellect, wouldn't this be considered murder? Wait.. I forgot.. Mice ARE more intelligent than men. So are dolphins. Nevermind. It would be a priviledge to the mice to be put out of their misery. All jokes aside, seriously, if they are "human" in consciousness and intelligence, killing them because they're "human" would be murder. It's also rather ironic if you think about it.

  22. The voyage is long by Vengeance · · Score: 2, Funny

    and sheep have many uses

    --
    It was a joke! When you give me that look it was a joke.
  23. Sheep blood by shog9 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Is a person a Luddite simply because they question the wisdom of doing something that is new?
    No, not until they start attacking the new thing with axes...
  24. Conflicted by donnyfire · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I have to say, as a medical student, that I am quite excited about the possibilities presented by this type of research. To be able to conduct research on tissue systems that are more human will provide better models for treatment of disease in humans. Thus making medicine more effective and safer. That being said, I am appalled at the prospect of ANY form of human hervous system running around in ANY other type of creature. True, it could provide tremendous insight into how the human brain works. However, it is my belief that the brian is the center of our humanity. It is the seat of who we are as a species, and is unique in the world. To artificially develop this type of tissue in an animal mode really seems to be an ethical misjudgement. A public backlash to this type of research could jeopardize research in general, which would be a disservice to the scientific community.

    1. Re:Conflicted by Musrum · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You need to seperate the harware from the software. We are not a sentient beings just because we have a homosapien brain. The brain is not the center of our humanity. It is simply a node...

      --
      In Soviet Amerika the ballot boxes YOU!
  25. Go back to writing about run-away brides by John+Newman · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Every once in a while you read a story that seems to have been written by a science writer with at least a quarter of a clue, and then you find that one fateful line that reaffirms the proper order of things: that science writers are complete idiots who have no business writing about science:
    First, human stem cells were injected into bacteria, then mice and now sheep.
    We inject human stem cells into single-celled prokaryotes that are probably less than one-thousandth the volume of a stem cell? I'd like to see that trick. The writer presumably confused human stem cells with human DNA, and probably wouldn't know the difference if it were pointed out to him/her, anyway.

    I despair of scientific literacy in this country.
  26. The real threat by mmmuttly · · Score: 2, Funny

    The real threat isn't sheep with human brains, it's cows with guns

  27. Re:Oryx and Crake by Adelbert · · Score: 2, Interesting
    This is way too close to Margaret Atwood's Oryx and Crake for comfort

    Actually, I was thinking that this was really close to the bit in "The Restaurant At The End Of The Universe" Where the cow tells Arthur that it looks forward to being eaten. Surely this is all this new tech is building up to?

  28. Rgh by ksilebo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I really could care less about the moral bullshit surrounding this. If it weren't for some people cracking open some skulls well before most of us were born, we wouldn't be able to perform surgery the way we do now. I'm not saying we should grab someone off the street and start experimenting on them, but growing almost 100% human brains in a sheep and then experimenting on it does not bother me. Unfortunately, there are far too many people who whine about this and make noise. I really hope the research is going on without anyone knowing, and we gain knowledge without having to answer to some religious crackpot protesting that some damn sheep has a human heart.

  29. brain transplant, please by js7a · · Score: 2, Funny
    While it is doubtful that anyone would want a brain transplant from a human-sheep chimera
    Speak for yourself, tree-hugging ludite-boy!
  30. I agree completely by mcc · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For fuck's sake. It's pretty much just agreed the world over that science will be constantly used to create new and horrible weapons that could kill increasingly large numbers of people in increasingly horrible ways, but that strangely enough it's expected will never be used. You tell someone about Russia restarting its nuclear weapons research program and people just shrug and go, meh, they do that.

    But if it turns out science might be at some point to do something that, rather than being horrific and violent, is merely strange, people freak the fuck out. A bomb that can kill billions in a single moment is shrugged off as normal. But tell someone that someone might be growing sheep with human livers, and what's the response? Oh no! What a horrible perversion of nature! Why do we continue to let such horrible things happen! Never mind that this, you know, has the capacity to save lives or create useful technology on a huge scale. It's "unnatural!" Of course, so is fire and clothing and the internet. But for some reason those are okay and genetic engineering is not.

    Mankind has the capacity to do strange and wonderful things, and instead of trying to find exactly where our capacities lie we're holding back everywhere just based on pure grossout factor.

    If the reason we're holding back scientific progress is actually "ethics"-- people complaining about genetics and such keep using that word, I am not sure they know what it means-- I want to know why they're worrying so much about sheep in laboratory conditions with some slightly strange DNA in their brains and totally ignoring the relatively horrible conditions that totally normal sheep, chickens, etc are being bred and harvested in on a worldwide scale. The worldwide march of technology and progress has brought a lot of horrible things, but we shrug, decide we don't care, and eat our chicken mcnuggets anyway. So why freak out so much over these sheep? If the rediculously unlikely situation we turn out to have created sheep with thinking, feeling human brains, okay, give them legal rights and a social security card and move on with your lives. I assure you, this isn't worse than what happened to the contents of those chicken mcnuggets, just a little bit wierder.

    1. Re:I agree completely by Fwonkas · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Ok, maybe I'm in the minority here, but I don't eat chicken mcnuggets. ;)

      That aside, while I see the validity and importance of most of your points, I think you're setting up a bit of a strawman argument here. Nuclear weapons programs are often implemented to ensure that other nations can't intimidate them with their nuclear arsenals. It's unpleasant, but at this time there are not many other options. I believe that's part of the reason for the so-called "Star Wars" program(s), as much as I question their usefulness.

      More importantly, you question the ethics of the opposition to this research. You're brushing off their concerns by saying, "give them legal rights and a social security card". The concern is that when you start to muddy up the distinctions between human and animal, it's less clear what sort of things are ethical. One wouldn't remove a healthy human's heart without their consent. If a sheep is part or mostly human, is it ok to remove their heart for transplant? That is an ethical question. Once it becomes ok to remove a quasi-human sheep's heart, how far a leap is it to remove a human's heart?

      That's totally disregarding the question of whether we're justified in doing these sorts of things to non-human animals capable of suffering anyway.

      I agree with some of your sentiment overall, and I think this sort of research can benefit humanity tremendously, but I just wanted to point these things out. I think it's unfair to characterize objections as being due to just "grossout factor(s)".

      --
      COMPUTER! Whatever happened to Blueberry Muffin?
    2. Re:I agree completely by Goldenfool · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You've raised several issues that should be addressed. First I want to agree with what you've said, your thinking is very much in line with my own. Science has been used to create an uncountable number of terrors that we have unleashed upon this world: the nuclear bomb, anthrax, computer viruses that can bring entire corporations to a standstill, and let's not forget Fear Factor.

      Science has also brought about a great deal of wonderful advances as well. Americans today throw away more food than ever before in the history of the world. We can get places faster and pollute our atmosphere and water with constantly increasing efficiency. And though we have the medicine and technology to allow people to live decades longer than they would have just a century ago, we see thousands of deaths every year from the excess consumption of Chicken McNuggets.

      Don't get me wrong, I think technology is a good thing. I just think that people need ot deal with it responsibly. Engineering a human liver in a sheep for instance, is not inherently wrong. The ethical argument against it is one of the legitimacy of "playing god." If you look at the most ubiquitious traits of "god" or any other divine figure, the defining characteristic is usually the ability to create and destroy up to a cosmic scale. Biblically speaking, man was created in the image of God. That does not just mean that we have bodies that look like his/hers/its. We, like God, have the ability to create and destroy.

      So the ethical question is "is it right to create a sheep with human organs?" I personally have no problem with this, and have trouble finding a theological basis for saying that God (or whathaveyou) would dislike this new "shuman" (or maybe just "heep) any less than any other creation on this planet. Just remember, we've been selectively breeding dogs for centuries for hunting, companionship, or even entertainment. Manipulating DNA is just the next step in selective breeding.

      One (or maybe more, I forget) of your responders brought up the issue of what happens on a social level when sheep become more human than sheep. What happens is if we deem them to be close enough to human, we will give them "human rights." We would not kill a human being to harvest their organs (in theory), so we would extend the same courtesy to the sheep. If they become sentient, who knows, maybe they'll get to vote. That's what happened when we finally realized that black people and women were sentient. Social definitions are constantly in flux and are extremely elastic. I see no reason why they would not be able to shift to accommodiate sentient species other than humans.

      Finally is the "gross-out" factor you speak of. To those who say that it is wrong to create sheep with human livers because it is gross and unnatural, I say "keep away from them, then." We hear the same sentiments towards lesbian/gay/bisexual/transgendered individuals. We're not saying that because they offend people they should not exist (at least, those of us with common sense and human decency don't). We say that if you're uncomfortable with people who live with that lifestyle, just don't bother them and they won't bother you. There was the same sort of social uproar 50 years ago when people tried to marry inter-racially or inter-faith. We are facing the definition of social acceptability and progress. I could go on about this, but I imagine most people haven't even bothered to read this far. To sum up, I agree with your point of view, I just felt it needed some exploration.

  31. Re:Bird brain by X0563511 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hmm... next step after geting a human like brain is to instigate Alztimers (spelling? im lazy) and see if we can figure out how to stop it, and, probably impossible, but reverse it.

    --
    For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
  32. Re:This reminds me of the game "Inherit the Earth" by ardor · · Score: 2, Informative

    Was your source the interview with the designer? Well, they did leave the possibility of human survivors open.

    Come to think of it, it would have been a very interesting story. In the game, it becomes clear that some sort of underground computer network exists, which controls the weather. These Orbs are just terminals. Thats exactly what the designer said.

    Now, what if some humans put themselves into some sort of cryosleep beneath the surface, ready to be reawakened when all signs of the virus are gone?

    Just imagine... humans, while rebuilding their civilization, encounter the Morphs. A really weird close encounter of the third kind, with the humans being the advanced aliens.

    Last but not least this game makes me wonder if our world is really as bad as many pessimists say. For the morphs, it appeared to be a miracle world. After playing through this game, seeing all those magnificent human constructions so empty, forgotten and desolated, somehow I just didn't want mankind to end like this.

    --
    This sig does not contain any SCO code.
  33. Clever Sheep by Brakz0rz · · Score: 2, Funny

    City Gent -- Good afternoon.
    Rustic -- Afternoon.
    City Gent -- A lovely day isn't it.
    Rustic -- Eh, 'tis that.
    City Gent -- You here on holiday or...?
    Rustic -- Nope, I live 'ere.
    City Gent -- Oh, jolly good too. (surveys field; he looks puzzled) I say, those are sheep aren't they?
    Rustic -- Ar.
    City Gent -- Yes, yes of course, I thought so...only...er why are they up in the trees?
    Rustic -- A fair question and one that in recent weeks has been much on my mind. It's my considered opinion that they're nesting.
    City Gent -- Nesting?
    Rustic -- Ar.
    City Gent -- Like birds?
    Rustic -- Ar. Exactly. Birds is the key to the whole problem. It's my belief that these sheep are laborin' under the misapprehension that they're birds. Observe their behavior. Take for a start the sheeps' tendency to 'op about the field on their back legs. (off-screen baa-ing) Now witness their attempts to fly from tree to tree. Notice that they do not so much fly as...plummet. (sound of sheep plummeting) Observe for example that ewe in that oak tree. She is clearly trying to teach her lamb to fly. (baaaaaa...thump) Talk about the blind leading the blind.
    City Gent -- But why do they think they're birds?
    Rustic -- Another fair question. One thing is for sure; a sheep is not a creature of the air. They have enormous difficulty in the comparatively simple act of perchin'. (crash) As you see. As for flight, its body is totally unadapted to the problems of aviation. Trouble is, sheep are very dim. Once they get an idea in their heads, there's no shifting it.
    City Gent -- But where did they get the idea from?
    Rustic -- From Harold. He's that sheep there over under the elm. He's that most dangerous of animals, a clever sheep. He's the ring-leader. He has realized that a sheep's life consists of standing around for a few months and then being eaten. And that's a depressing prospect for an ambitious sheep. He's patently hit on the idea of escape.
    City Gent -- Well why don't you just get rid of Harold?
    Rustic -- Because of the enormous commercial possibilities should he succeed.

    --
    "Man will never be free until the last king is strangled with the entrails of the last priest." - Denis Diderot
  34. Re:what happens when they show human behaviour? by MidnightBrewer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Okay, just because you have human brain cells does not automatically make the brain capable of human intelligence. First of all, human brain cells taken as individual neurons are by no means superior to any other animals. Second of all, this is definitely a case of "it's the size that counts." Not only does the brain's structure play a role in how the brain works, but its size matters, too. A brain that is too small is going to simply lack the critical mass to develop past a certain level of intelligence. Finally, it's like pouring water into a container: the water takes on the form of whatever it's in. So whereas there's a remote possibility that the sheep might be smarter than average (and that's assuming a lot), the sensory inputs to teach the brain are completely wrong; it will be a human brain that thinks it's a sheep.

    Let's put it this way: how do you know you're not a sheep's brain trapped in a human body?

    --
    "Give a man fire, and he'll be warm for a day; set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life
  35. I'm sure someone already said it by chochos · · Score: 4, Funny
    but here it goes...
    Just the possibility of a human mind bouncing around inside a sheep's head is a scary proposition
    Would this be scary because it is the exact opposite of what we see every day, namely people with sheep's minds walking all around?
  36. Human Sheep? by Antarius · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Just the possibility of a human mind bouncing around inside a sheep's head is a scary proposition.

    I second that. Let's have a look through history at what all of the human-brained sheep have done so far:

    The Crusades, The Spanish Inquisition, The Hundred-Years War...

    Yup. You just described Christianity. They are described in the Bible as Sheep, no?