Slashdot Mirror


Hong Kong Boy Scouts to Protect IP

phresno writes "Declan McCullagh at C|net's News.com has a short article on the development that the Hong Kong Boy Scouts Association has teamed up with the MPA to create an intellectual property merit badge. Mike Ellis of the MPA hopes this program will 'provide thousands of young people -- future leaders -- with a better understanding of the value of intellectual property.' Those with tinfoil hats will surely be thinking of the youth in Orwell's 1984."

102 of 617 comments (clear)

  1. Hong Kong Piracy by Excen · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is it just me, or is Hong Kong the perfect place for the MPAA to start brainwashing the youngest members of our society?

    --
    "No beer until you finish your tequila!" -Leela's Dad
    1. Re:Hong Kong Piracy by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      START?!?!? For those of us who grew up in the tin foil hat crowd, the Boy Scouts were corrupted long ago- this is just putting that corruption to a new use.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
    2. Re:Hong Kong Piracy by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, Hong Kong is the perfect place to earn your "The Ruling Party is Not to be Questioned" merit badge.

      They could issue that one in this country pretty soon.

      --
      It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    3. Re:Hong Kong Piracy by over_exposed · · Score: 5, Funny

      Was there a spelling merit badge?

      --
      "The object of war is not to die for your country, but to make the other bastard die for his." - Patton
    4. Re:Hong Kong Piracy by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm sorry, I must have completely missed the corporate oligarchy part. I learned how to tie knots, and do first aid.

      What, you missed walking little old ladies across the street, being truthfull and upright, and following the law (the last of which was written by the corporate oligarchy for their own interests)?

      What kind of Boy Scout troop were YOU in?

      Maybe an overly moral one- but I'm talking more about stereotypes than reality anyway.

      --
      SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  2. Children by fembots · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Funny how you can still make use of children if you hit the right note.

  3. Suggest Your Own Merit Badges Here!!! by rewinn · · Score: 5, Funny

    How about a GPL Merit Badge?

    1. Re:Suggest Your Own Merit Badges Here!!! by Alpha_Traveller · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Uh...Why is this funny?
      (Yes, I get the joke and yes, funny.)

      Frankly, it's a great suggestion. I'd love to have America's youth thinking good things like the Mantra of GPL, instead of bad things like "...let's keep all the good things to ourselves and make some moolah or shut out the little guy"...

      --
      "Love is like pi - natural, irrational, and very important." (Lisa Hoffman)
    2. Re:Suggest Your Own Merit Badges Here!!! by PaxTech · · Score: 4, Funny

      How about a GPL Merit Badge?

      You have to make the badge yourself, but you do get the use of patterns and yarn donated by the community.

      Of course, then there will inevitably be articles written criticizing you for putting people out of work in the seamstress industry..

      --
      All movements for social change begin as missions, evolve into businesses, and end up as rackets.
    3. Re:Suggest Your Own Merit Badges Here!!! by Rude+Turnip · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I'd like to propose the "Cleaning Out Spyware and Installing Firefox" badge :)

    4. Re:Suggest Your Own Merit Badges Here!!! by wankledot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think that last statement describes America quite well.

      --
      My sig is blank, I typed this by hand.
  4. This is sick by Saven+Marek · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Let me be one of the first to say this is absolutely sickening. Boy scouts are about honor and doing what is right and about self reliance and about all other good things like that. Not about serving commercial interests.

    What next they have a McDonalds Merit Badge given to the kids who can eat a quarter pounder a day all week for supporting a good old american company? Well it means the same thing.

    1. Re:This is sick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      What next they have a McDonalds Merit Badge given to the kids who can eat a quarter pounder a day all week for supporting a good old american company?

      I hope so. I could sure use the additional "quadruple-bypass-survivor" merit badge.

    2. Re:This is sick by LWATCDR · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Let me be one of the first to say this is absolutely sickening. Boy scouts are about honor and doing what is right and about self reliance and about all other good things like that. Not about serving commercial interests."
      Frankly I guess I am confused. Is pirating and right? I thought that the main complaint with the RIAA was with there tactics, destruction of the princeable of fair use, and just general nastyness. I mean the FSF uses the very same IP laws to go after people that break the GPL. Are they just as evil since they go after violators of their IP as does the RIAA?
      I really thought it was about keeping your rights to privacy not piracy.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    3. Re:This is sick by The+Good+Reverend · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Boy scouts are about honor and doing what is right and about self reliance and about all other good things like that...

      Yes, because excluding gays and atheists from their organization is both honorable and good, right?

      There are much, much bigger problems with this pseudo-military youth group than RIAA merit badges. They deserve neither our respect nor our money.

    4. Re:This is sick by Enigma_Man · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Right. It's too bad that instead of just keeping to "Please don't copy this music to other folks, thanks" they tack on the "also, pay us more if you want this in other formats, mwahahaha" bit.

      -Jesse

      --
      Nothing says "unprofessional job" like wrinkles in your duct tape.
    5. Re:This is sick by caino59 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Very true.

      Being an assitant scoutmaster (and eagle scout) - I'm very interested in seeing what this merit badge entails.

      Respect for others ideas and creations is good.

      However, the extortion that the RIAA and MPAA are engaging in is terrible.

    6. Re:This is sick by LurkerXXX · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Since it's a social organization and has nothing to do with the government, I'd suppose theyd feel about the same that a pope in Italy is the religious leader of a large segment of the American people. They wouldn't care. It has nothing to do with government. If the Boy Scouts want to have a silly badge, well so what? It won't be the first silly thing they've done. Get over it.

    7. Re:This is sick by brontus3927 · · Score: 4, Informative
      With the exception of maybe 5% (2% who earn the rank of Eagle, and maybe 3% who care but aren't able to make it that far) of Boy Scouts, scouting is about being in a social club. There are over 100 merit badges, maybe 2 dozen relate to the core of scouting. The rest are things that started out as an opportunity to educate young people on technologies (like Computers and atomic energy), become horribly out of date because there isn't enough interest in updating them, and scouts (if they can find a leader certified to sign off on that badge) getting them to have a longer list of badges. When I was a scout in the 90's, my troop (which was an Eagle generating powerhouse, averaging 2/year in a troop with a membership ~30) more than half of the merit badges didn't have anyone qualified to teach them. I went to a jamboree to get my Computers merit badge, and the book had images of an Apple IIG!

      Below are the requirements for the Computers Merit Badge which was "updated" a few years ago:

      1. Give a short history of computers. Describe the major parts of a computer system. Give four different uses of computers.
      2. Do the following:
        1. Tell what a program is and how it is developed.
        2. Give three examples of programming languages and what types of programming they are used for.
        3. Describe a source program and an object program.
      3. Show how the following may be stored in computer memory: text, numbers, pictures, and sound.
      4. Do THREE of the following:
        1. Use a database manager to create a troop roster, providing name, rank, patrol, and telephone number of each Scout. Sort the register by rank, by patrol, and alphabetically by name.
        2. Use a spreadsheet program to develop a weekend campout food budget for your patrol.
        3. Use a word processor to write a letter to parents of your troop's Scouts, inviting them to a court of honor. Use the mail merge feature to make a personalized copy of the letter for each family.
        4. Use a computer graphics program to design and draw a campsite plan for your troop.
      5. Do TWO of the following:
        1. Visit a business or industry that uses computers. Study what the computer accomplishes and be prepared to discuss what you observed.
        2. Use a computer attached to a local area network or equipped with a modem to connect to a computer network or bulletin-board service such as Prodigy, CompuServe, or America Online. Send a message to someone on the network or download a program or file from the network.
        3. Use a general-purpose programming language to write a program application of your choice, subject to approval by your counselor.
      6. Be prepared to discuss several terms used in each of the following categories:
        1. Input/output devices
        2. Storage media
        3. Memory
        4. Processors and coprocessors
        5. Modems
        6. Networks
        7. Electronic mail
        8. Robotics
      7. Be prepared to discuss various jobs in the computer field.
      8. Is it permissible to accept a free copy of a computer game or program from a friend? Why or why not?
      9. Describe several ways in which you and your family could use a personal computer other than for games and recreation.
    8. Re:This is sick by garcia · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, because excluding gays and atheists from their organization is both honorable and good, right?

      Excluding homosexuals is the new and "acceptable" racism but them excluding atheists isn't surprising...

      The BSA is traditionally quite religion oriented ("do my duty to God..." and all that) and many faiths offer religion awards (which are difficult to obtain I might add). Hell, most BSA troops are sponsored by Churchs!

      In the Troop that I belonged to we had a kid that was an atheist. They kept their mouths shut about it and the son eventually earned Eagle shortly after I did. Big deal.

      In an organization that is based on relgion, hosted in relgious buildings, and says you should believe in some sort of God (doesn't matter which) you can be happy just playing along. If you want to stir the pot they have every right to shun you.

      Don't like it? Don't join up and start your own organization.

    9. Re:This is sick by sconeu · · Score: 4, Funny

      download a program or file from the network

      So, to get the Computers Merit Badge, you have to give up all hope of getting the IP Merit Badge?

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    10. Re:This is sick by netruner · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Before I get started, I need to say that I have had a college course that extensively covered IP issues and also was an Eagle Scout.

      The thing that I find problematic about this is that the adult world hasn't figured out how much creedence to give IP rights, yet the group in question appears to be indoctrinating the youth. Understanding that Scouting in other countries can work differently, the core values should remain the same. I seem to remember something in scouting about being an upstanding, law-abiding citizen- so maybe it's not a total sell-out. It's entirely possible that the merit badge covers what is legal/illegal and not ethical/unethcal by corporate standards.

      My final thought: We adults need to get our story straight before we start teaching the next generation what is right and wrong.

      --



      DISCLAIMER: This post was not checked for speling and grammar- if you complain- you're a whiner
    11. Re:This is sick by goldspider · · Score: 4, Informative
      May I be the first to say "GET BENT!" With that off my chest, might I refer you to our Bill of Rights.

      Specifically: "...or the right of the people peaceably to assemble"

      The Boy Scouts, or any private group for that matter, may exclude whomever they so choose, for any reason. This particular group does not believe that homosexuality or atheism are acceptable lifestyles.

      Who are YOU to impose your beliefs upon them? Isn't that the very thing you people are fond of accusing 'conservative' groups of doing?

      It is petty of you to deride an organization that first and foremost encourages community volunteerism and service. It is best that people like you don't associate with the Boy Scouts; your involvement would taint their good work.

      --
      "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    12. Re:This is sick by NixLuver · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Of course, that's only if you buy the propaganda of the corporate weasles that have turned "copyright infringement" into "theft"; not equivalent concepts at all. The reason it was called 'copyright' is because - get this weird concept - it granted you sole right to profit from copying of the work for a limited period of time, which is very clearly different from 'ownership'. Remedies were all civil until our 'copyright' and 'trademark' process got turned into "Intellectual Property" by the lobbyists of the "IP companies" - those who would found an empire on a single concept rather than develop new ones often enough to stay afloat.

    13. Re:This is sick by The+Good+Reverend · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's my right when they use government subsidies, meet at public schools, and use public funds. They can do anything they like as soon as they stop all those things.

    14. Re:This is sick by FirstTimeCaller · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Below are the requirements for the Computers Merit Badge which was "updated" a few years ago:
      ...
      connect to a computer network or bulletin-board service such as Prodigy, CompuServe, or America Online.

      Prodigy? CompuServe? I think they may want to consider yet another update.

      --
      Wanted: witty unique signature. Must be willing to relocate.
    15. Re:This is sick by Tassach · · Score: 3, Informative
      MPAA DOES have some legitimate gripes
      I don't consider "our business model has been made obsolete by technology" to be a legitimate gripe.

      "Intellectual Property" is a legal fiction, created with the explicit purpose of encouraging progress in the arts and sciences. In the days before costless electronic duplication, granting a temporary legal monopoly on a work was a good strategy to achieve this end. However, modern technology has called into question the validity of this definition of "property". It's legitimate to challenge the notion that a particular combination of words, sounds, and images can be owned for all eternity (even if eternity is purchased on an installment plan).

      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    16. Re:This is sick by ggvaidya · · Score: 3, Funny

      "quadruple-bypass-survivor" merit badge.

      Pish, the really cool one is the "performed-quadruple-bypass-while-in-the-middle-of -a-jungle-with-a-pocket-knife-two-centimetres-of-r ubber-tubing-and-a-duct-tape" badge!

      (But what do I know, I'm still working on my "stupid-bloody-program-compiles-and-maybe-just-may be-WORKS-dag-nab-it" badge :| ...)

    17. Re:This is sick by NixLuver · · Score: 2, Insightful

      By this rationale, the United States wouldn't exist. The Boston Tea Party was blatantly illegal. There is an obvious difference between "real properties" and so-called "Intellectual Properties" - so much so that our Founding fathers debated as to whether they should even be allowed, or must be required. Teach those kids the whole story - like the fact that most bands OWE MONEY to the company that distributes their first three cds, and that they only make MONEY on TOURS, and I think you'll see a completely different perspective from those kids.
      I am really tired of the rampant 'corporatization' of the common perception of 'copyright'. It (copyright) is *not* ownership, and no one was confused about that until Disney and the *AA started spending big cash on lobbying Washington; and now we're exporting our brain-damaged brand of "Intellectual Properties" via economic blackmail.

    18. Re:This is sick by Tassach · · Score: 2, Insightful
      upholding the law is both right and honourable.
      Upholding an unjust law is neither right nor honourable; disobeying such a law is both.
      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    19. Re:This is sick by The+Good+Reverend · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I would personally be less supportive of them if they chose that route

      You'd only be less supportive? That's pretty fucked up. Do you support the KKK for their fantastic parades, even though there's all that "other stuff"?

      The BSA is at least partially supported by government money - mines and yours. They should have to live up standards that don't exclude for reasons like race, religion, and sexual preference.

    20. Re:This is sick by replicant108 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Getting Boy Scouts (of whatever nation) to honor someone else's property etc etc

      "If nature has made any one thing less susceptible than all others of exclusive property, it is the action of the thinking power called an idea, which an individual may exclusively possess as long as he keeps it to himself; but the moment it is divulged, it forces itself into the possession of every one, and the receiver cannot dispossess himself of it. Its peculiar character, too, is that no one possesses the less, because every other possesses the whole of it. He who receives an idea from me, receives instruction himself without lessening mine; as he who lights his taper at mine, receives light without darkening me. That ideas should freely spread from one to another over the globe, for the moral and mutual instruction of man, and improvement of his condition, seems to have been peculiarly and benevolently designed by nature, when she made them, like fire, expansible over all space, without lessening their density in any point, and like the air in which we breathe, move, and have our physical being, incapable of confinement or exclusive appropriation. Inventions then cannot, in nature, be a subject of property."

      http://press-pubs.uchicago.edu/founders/documents/ a1_8_8s12.html

    21. Re:This is sick by ScentCone · · Score: 2, Insightful

      adult world hasn't figured out how much creedence to give IP rights

      What? It's completely unambiguous, and there are very clear-cut laws on the books. You Cannot Rip People Off - what haven't we figured out about that?

      What you probably mean to say is that the part of the population that doesn't like to pay entertainers for their work haven't yet brainwashed enough eventual voters into thinking that they have an entitlement to free movies and music, and thus we haven't yet changed the laws to make it so. Right now it's unambiguously illegal to rip off the artists, and the only variable is the number of people that think it should be OK. The good news (for the artists) is that the people that are too lazy to be able to afford to pay for their entertainment are also, generally, too intellectually lazy to even go through the motions of justifying piracy in terms that the rest of the productive economy will endorse.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    22. Re:This is sick by The+Good+Reverend · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Suppose the situation were turned around, and the local Atheism Club turned down a Boy Scout for membership because he was religious. Should the Boy Scout feel "excluded"? Of course not! It's perfectly acceptable for an organization of people to form around a shared value and to only allow in people who share that value. There's nothing dishonorable or mean about this.

      I happen to run a local Atheists organization, and we welcome all comers. But if I got money from the US government, or was meeting in publically owned building, I'd have to make damn sure I was open to everyone. I can choose to exclude, but if I'm getting any public help, like the BSA does, my responabilities change.

    23. Re:This is sick by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Where did he say they don't have the right to exclude gays?
      Where did he say they had to be forced to include gays? HE DIDN'T.

      All he did is to point out that they are a group of bigoted, homophobic assholes. They have the RIGHT to be bigoted hompophobic assholes, and he has the right to point to them and say "Hey look! A bunch of bigoted homophobic assholes!"

      Why are YOU to impose your beliefs on the parent poster and tell him he has no right to point out that he thinks a group is doing something he considers immoral?

      He is not a hypocrite - the boy scouts are saying homosexuality is bad, the parent poster is saying the boy scouts are bad. You, on the other hand, are implying not just that the parent posters beliefs are bad in your opinion, but that he has no right to express them... the irony and hypocricy of your own statement clearly eludes you.

      --
      This space available.
    24. Re:This is sick by bleckywelcky · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually, they don't use public resources as much as you may think.

      I was in a scout troop when I was young and had friends in other scout troops. All of our troops used private churches to meet in.

      I recall one scout troop that did use a local elementary school gym for their meetings. However, it is still within their right to exclude gays and atheists from joining their club. If a gay or atheist wanted to walk into the gym, the troop wouldn't force them out (unless of course they were being ridiculous, yelling and screaming or something). If a gay or atheist group wanted to use the gym, they could sign up just like everyone else. Yet, they can exclude straight and religious people from their groups.

      Public resources don't mean that you have to be completely PC when you use those resources. They are just available to the public. If an equestrian club wants to use a public park, but won't allow anyone to join that doesn't have a horse, should they be banned from using that public resource?

      And governmnet subsidies and public funds don't really make their way into the scouts anyhow. Pretty much all of the organization is run by volunteers, scouts pay dues to run their troops. Everyone pays for their own supplies, scout uniforms, scout books, etc. Camping supplies are paid for through fundraisers by the troops. They may take grants for specific projects though, ie: if a grant existed to clean up some wetlands, they might take on that project. But the goal of the grant is to clean up the wetlands, it doesn't care who does it. So the scouts will achieve that goal.

      If you have any facts to back up your claims, I'd like to see them.

    25. Re:This is sick by Ironsides · · Score: 2, Informative

      The BSA is at least partially supported by government money - mines and yours. They should have to live up standards that don't exclude for reasons like race, religion, and sexual preference.

      Er.. Actually, it isn't. The BSA does not get one red cent of funding from the federal government. Maybe in grants to do something, but not as general funding. The troops are entirely self financed.

      As for excluding people based on race and religion? They do not exclude based on race, and the only troops that are allowed to deny based on religion are the mormon troops. But that is because the churches have all their boys join the troop. They're large enough as is.

      That leaves sexual preference. The only way that the troops do exclude. That comes down to the scouts being a religious organization (of many relgions, not just one). With most of the religions believing that being gay is a sin. Nothing you can do about that.

      But, back to the money, none of yours is paying for the troops to operate. As for mine, well, I'm a scoutmaster. So some of mine is. Don't want to support the scouts? Don't buy anything from their fundraisers and don't donate any money. But the scouts don't get any money from the governments unless it's for a job they do.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    26. Re:This is sick by The+Good+Reverend · · Score: 2, Informative

      Check out Scouting for All's website at http://www.scoutingforall.org/packtroop/index.shtm l - lots of good information on the subject.

    27. Re:This is sick by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You seem to be going out of your way to be inflammatory. Not everyone who complains about draconian IP laws are simply out to score free stuff, and--despite your comments--you know it.

      The laws are not always clear cut, and where they are clear cut, they do not always represent the best interests of fairness, justice, or society as a whole.

      Do you think it's right that a documentary maker loses the right to use a shot because it happened to catch a few seconds of a TV playing "The Simpsons?" Do you really think our society is served by keeping "The Grapes of Wrath" under copyright until 2038? What about the literally millions of copyrighted works that no longer have value to the copyright holder, or for whom the copyright holder can't even be found? Should we make sure those works can't be copied either, until those copies which do remain have crumbled into dust? Should researchers face criminal prosecution merely for discussing the copyright protection measures of a new gadget?

      If these are the sort of fair laws that you want Boy Scouts to be taught to respect and obey, then your endeavor is doomed. Even a twelve year old can see that "IP law" is just a big, corporate-sponsored power grab, and any attempts to teach them to respect those laws will only result in their losing respect for all laws.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    28. Re:This is sick by serutan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      intellectual property was created for the sole purpose of giving content creation a viable business model

      The key word is a small one: "a". The content industry wants everybody to keep thinking "a" viable business model means "the only possible" viable business model. They also want people to keep thinking "representative government" means company lawyers handing pieces of paper to senators to introduce verbatim as laws. When the big kids play dirty it gives the little kids an incentive to follow suit, and to some degree I think it's a reasonable justification.

    29. Re:This is sick by 99BottlesOfBeerInMyF · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What you probably mean to say is that the part of the population that doesn't like to pay entertainers for their work haven't yet brainwashed enough eventual voters into thinking that they have an entitlement to free movies and music, and thus we haven't yet changed the laws to make it so.

      You can't "rip-off" a dead person by making a copy of their book. If anything I think most authors would prefer that their work was available forever, instead of deleted from history. In any case the author's wishes do not trump the rights of all mankind. Copyright is supposed to be a two-way deal. Author gets a limited term monopoly on publishing, the world gets as many copies as they want in perpetuity. Unfortunately, limited term has become "forever" and works or art, literature, music, film, and even video games are vanishing daily. Gone and destroyed never to be seen or read again, because it is illegal for anyone but one person/group/company to make new copies and they won't or can't or don't even exist anymore.

      Have you ever heard of the book "Solomon's Crown" written by a notorious but anonymous 1950's pulp author? Niether has anyone else. That is because although the book is wonderful it is impossible to get a copy and illegal to make a copy if someone can find it. That applies to about 70% of all blues music in existence. It also applies to the vast majority of video games more than 10 years old.

      How about "It's a Wonderful Life," have you heard of that movie. Well you wouldn't have if the copyright had not expired. It bombed at the box office and was tossed into storage. When the copyright expired PBS aired it and it was instantly a hit. Then through some legal voodoo it became copyrighted again, and PBS has to pay if they want to play it. Now if you haven't noticed nothing has come out of copyright for the last 29 years. All those great works like "It's a Wonderful Life" are just rotting, or thrown out, or in storage, or abandoned all so they don't compete with whatever media companies are pushing today.

      If anyone is being ripped off it is the populace in general who has been robbed of all those works, all that heritage erased and destroyed by greed and corrupt politicians. I've spent years trying to find particular books. They aren't for sale, most can't be found in any library. It used to be any work that was to copyrighted had to have a copy sent to the Library of Congress. That was repealed too. Now there are no copies. And even if their were, most people could not read them, because it would be illegal to make more.

      It's completely unambiguous

      I agree, but I don't think I agree that copyright is moral or ethical right now. In it's current state it is killing our literary and cultural heritage. It is sickening.

    30. Re:This is sick by Hiro+Antagonist · · Score: 2, Informative

      You, dear sir, are a complete idiot.

      It is indeed perfectly reasonable to pay ENTERTAINERS for their work. It is not reasonable to pay some bloody cartel which fights tooth-and-claw against any form of distribution medium which they do not control and profit from. Personally, I don't buy CDs, because I think it is wrong for the ENTERTAINERS to get a few pennies out of the twenty dollars I spend to purchase an item that costs all of about five dollars to make and distribute.

      The ENTERTAINERS, at least the ones that aren't owned or owned by major corporations, are thrilled about MP3s and BitTorrent. Why? Because they can finally make their work available to a wide audience in a way never before possible. The technology that exists now allowes authors, musicians, and producers to bring their work to the public, without the requirement of access to a multibillion-dollar private distribution network, because they've got a multibillion-dollar public distribution network -- the Internet.

      ENTERTAINERS who produce quality in this marketplace are rewarded; look at the Ataris, for example. They put up not only MP3s of all their music, but also make the sheet music and gutair tabs available online FOR FREE, and they still sell CDs and T-shirts like mad. Only rather than the RIAA getting the profits, the band, the people ACTUALLY DOING THE ENTERTAINING, are making money.

      The RIAA and MPAA could play in this ballgame, if they were willing to just let people copy; they could still sell at the same price point, and would still make a boatload of cash off the people who are either serious fans, technically illiterate enough to grab the file off of BitTorrent, and people who just want The Theatre or The Concert experience. There is still tons of money to be made, probably more than they make now, if they just played nice with the community.

      The problem is, they don't, and they won't. They have extended copyright to the force of patent law, and made it possible to OWN ideas as if they were property, at least in the 'States, and all so that they can control distribution. So that the MPAA and RIAA can guarantee that You Have Paid, and that You Aren't Stealing Their Art. Copyright was intended so that the author of a work could profit for a limited amount of time; it was never intended to turn art into a commercial industry, yet with the present limits on copyright, art can be nothing but a commercial industry.

      Art does not come from industry. It comes from taking a pile of ideas, mixing them up, and pulling out something that is somehow new and rehashed at the same time. All of the great novels of the world, all of the great paintings, the great symphonies, every piece of art that has stunned mankind has come about only because people had free access to the ideas. All of art copies other art, and without this process, no new art is produced. The process is, in short, evolutionary, and evolution does not work in a system where the copying of ideas, known as variation in this analogy, does not happen.

      The RIAA and MPAA want to own all of Art. They want it packaged, boxed, and unoffensive enough to sell at Wal-Mart. To do this, they must control all distribution, and prevent Those Who Have Not Paid and Those Who Are Not Authorized from being involved in Art as anything more than a passing pursuit. The cartels' quest for money comes at the expense of the ENTERTAINERS, the people producing the art in its myriad forms that we so enjoy, and to claim that this is somehow morally right is a perversion of logic of the highest order.

      --

      --
      I Hit the Karma Cap, and All I Got Was This Lousy .sig.
    31. Re:This is sick by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If this is really that lucrative of a business model, why aren't more people doing it? The reason is that it's not as profitable as traditional, intellectual property-backed models.

      Just how profitable are these "traditional ip-backed models" when everyone is copying the "ip" on the net for nothing, despite it being illegal with draconian punishments to do so?

      Maybe the reason more people aren't doing it yet is inertia. Intellectually, most people are still stuck in the payment via distribution system and haven't seriously considered any other option. Technologicly, the internet is still a baby. File copying has been easy to implement because there is no government involvement - money transfers is much more complicated due in part to all of the regulation, just ask paypal.

      Arguing that any other approach is invalid because it is not already in use is just circular reasoning.

      With this model, a creator only makes a fixed amount of money, whereas a creator can sell their work for the duration of their copyright

      You are arguing that it is better to gamble on the popularity of a product after having invested in the effort to create it than it is to take a known return on an essentially risk free production? I know A LOT of investors that would love to be able to earn a guaranteed return of even just 10% a quarter.

      all the proposed alternative business models have one thing in common: less profit for the creator.

      I believe this to be false. The current approach encourages superstars and abject failures - for every michael jackson, there are 100,000 nobodies who gambled and lost.

      I don't care about the creator, and neither does society.

      I believe this to be false. Society cares about the creator immensely, the creator is effectively a brand name. If the creator has a good reputation for producing desirable work, then consumers are willing to trust that the creator's next work will be similarly desirable. To argue otherwise is to deny the obvious - Tom Cruise, Stephen King, Led Zeppelin, Quentin Tarantino - creators in all genres are just as important, if not more so, to the buying public than the most heavily promoted coroprate brands like Nike and Coke.

      A work-for-hire mechanism can be at least as lucrative as the current system. Today, anyone starting out pretty much works for free - musicians either give it away on the net or give it away to the RIAA. Indie film producers are lucky to even be selected for a film festival, much less get distribution. So given that baseline, a work-for-hire model requires that initial creations be sold for little or no money in order to build a reputation for the creator. If the creator is good, he will be able to command increasingly higher fees for each new creation - not because people are necessarily willing to pay more, but because the better his stuff, the larger the pool of people who have experienced it and liked it enough to pay for the next work will be. For example, with roughly a billion people on the net, if only 0.1% think that Joe Cool's next album is worth $1 to them, that's $1,000,000 direct to Joe Cool. That's the kind of money only the super of the super-stars see on any regular basis.

    32. Re:This is sick by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 2

      People infringe on copyright precisely because they don't see any repercussions for their actions. Furthermore, if people disregard intellectual property laws, of course those business models won't be profitable. My whole point was that society benefits from IP laws existing and people following them, although the laws aren't perfect and need to be changed.

      The laws are both draconian and unenforceable. No matter how you change the laws, the unenforceable part will never change. Relying on unenforceable laws to support an arbitrary business model is pure folly. You can not fight human nature and win. You can try, you can make it a long, bloody battle, but in the end you will lose. You can not cite a single example in all of mankind's history that shows otherwise.

      If that was true, then more people would use that system.

      Again, circular reasoning proves nothing.

      The reason artists don't use that model is because traditional models are more lucrative.

      The reason artists don't use that model is because traditional models HAVE BEEN more lurcrative than traditional options. Times are changing. If they weren't changing, we would not be having this discussion because payment-pooling is a NEW option.

      I can make sure the work is good before I buy it by listening to it in a store, or listening to a preview on iTunes. In the model you suggest

      You can, most people don't. Even the people that do, do not "preview" the ENTIRE product before hand. Many people pre-order books, CDs and DVDs, buy movie tickets on opening night, go to concerts, susbcribe to magazines and premium cable channels. I subscribe to the Economist based on their editorial reputation. Heck, I even subscribe to Film Movement's DVD-of-the-month service based soley on their past ability to select good movies. A large amount, probably a large MAJORITY of entertainment purchasing decisions are based on the REPUTATION of the creators or service providers. Sure, some people read reviews, hear things through word of mouth, etc. But there is no better advertisement than free access to all of an artist's prior creations.

      I would have to function as a venture capitalist. I don't want to do that, and neither do most people. We don't get a return on investment other than the work itself, so there is very little incentive for consumers to take that risk.

      As I just demonstrated, people take equivalent risks all the time. The upside under either the current system or a work-for-hire system is that you get a good product, the downside is that you get a sucky product. That's the entire risk. If you went to the theater during open weekend for Gigli, you didn't get your money back, but you probably are going to think twice about shelling out for the next Ben Affleck movie. Under a work-for-hire system, you would have had EXACTLY the same experience.

      This occurs very infrequently, if at all. If this model was as profitable as you say, they would choose this model instead.

      Around and around you go with the circular reasoning - don't look at anything new because its not already old and well-understood... Mass payment pooling systems are JUST NOW on the verge of becoming possible - therefore few people have even had the chance to experiment with them. Even so, one musician has already won a grammy for an album funded in a somewhat similar fashion - jazz vocalist Maria Schneider.

      The "get a new business model" argument is crap unless you want to see less creative works produced.

      Have you considered that maybe we would see MORE works and MORE creativity if the current system was junked? ALL of your arguments are based on the UNPROVABLE contention that since what we have today has, to some extent, worked in the past, there can be no better way to do things in the future. The converse is also true, I can't prove that any new way would be better. But at least my proposal addresses the FUNDAMENTAL failing of the current system - that information wants to be free because it is human nature to make it so, and digital networks are the enabler for that. Your way tries to fight human nature, my way co-opts it and uses it to promote further creativity.

  5. The Badge by Artax · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Really at the end of the day its just a badge. Sure it brainwashes kids to keep their intellectual property safe. Maybe if they keep the property then they will begin to think that the government can't interfere with their own intellectual property. This would be a huge step forward in China.

    --
    Don't mod me up.
    1. Re:The Badge by Tackhead · · Score: 5, Funny
      > > Those with tinfoil hats will surely be thinking of the youth in Orwell's 1984."
      >
      >Maybe if they keep the property then they will begin to think that the government can't interfere with their own intellectual property. This would be a huge step forward in China.

      slashdot 54550 reporting: lastpost 877602 doubleplusungood refs unevent "great leap forward". Rewrite fullwise upmod anteposting.

      If shinyvictoryhelmet wearing, plusoldposter unknow crimethink! PWN3D :)

      --
      Long live the Greater Eastasian Co-Prosperity Sphere Junior Anti-Piracy League!

  6. This has to be a joke by Eric(b0mb)Dennis · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Because, if you think piracy is bad here in the US...

    In Asia it's all but legal. The problem is so big that mitigating it will take a lot more than a few boyscouts earning merit badges in Intellectual Property.

    That is the most absurd think i've ever heard!!! Where is the world coming to?

    --
    Excuse me, I don't mean to impose, but I am the ocean
  7. What? by Omega1045 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Funny, my calendar shows May 3rd, not April 1st... this is just weird and scary.

    --

    Great ideas often receive violent opposition from mediocre minds. - Albert Einstein

  8. BSA by ReverendLoki · · Score: 4, Funny

    You know, it used to annoy me that these two shared the same initials. Turns out it was just being a bit prophetic...

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
  9. l33t skillz merit badge by MooseByte · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Hong Kong Boy Scouts Association has teamed up with the MPA to create an intellectual property merit badge."

    I think the "l33t skillz" merit badge is going to trump that one any day of the week...

    1. Re:l33t skillz merit badge by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 4, Funny

      To earn the l33t skilz merit badge one must obtain the IP merit badge off another Socut's uniform without the other Scout's knowledge.

      --
      If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
  10. fucking disgusting by SirSlud · · Score: 3, Insightful

    When a large industry has trouble enforcing rules it effectively set (speficially copyright terms and reductions on what constitutes fair use,) and begins to use Boy Scouts to 'spread the gospel'/'indoctrinate', you have to wonder if the law really is in the interest of the people.

    Yet another case of people serving the economy, as opposed to vice versa.

    --
    "Old man yells at systemd"
  11. Or.. by Sanity · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Those with tinfoil hats will surely be thinking of the youth in Orwell's 1984
    Or in Hitler's Germany. Co-opting the youth is a common tactic for those that wish to exercise control over society. This is easy because the youth tend to be more gullible (sorry but its true, Pokemon anyone?).

    The key question is why the education systems we all pay for are facilitating this (although perhaps not in this particular case, many schools in the US have also been willing channels for pro-intellectual property propaganda).

    1. Re:Or.. by Sandbox+Conspiracy · · Score: 3, Informative

      Kids also make the best soldiers since they lack the life perspective of adults (my theory). I was recently reading an article about Ugandan rebels who kidnap children from orphanages to retrain them into miniature killing machines. The truly chilling part was the brutal unquestioning efficiency with which the children carried out executions of prisoners.

      --
      Why am I on Slashdot? I'm bored. Why am I bored? I'm on Slashdot.
    2. Re:Or.. by deanj · · Score: 2, Insightful

      First, Godwin's Law invoked, so you lose the argument by default.

      Second, that's Hong Kong we're talking about, not the US, at least for this story. ...I agree with everything else you said though.

      The "Polticially Correct" speech that's forced in schools these days IS what was warned about in 1984.

      Those not saying the "right words" are accused of "thought crimes", or "hate speech" just because they used words someone else didn't like. So much for free speech.

  12. The Golden Arcade by HungWeiLo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Visitors to Hong Kong some years ago may remember the Golden Arcade. It was infamous for bootleg software, movies, video games, and anything else that resides on digital media.

    After that got closed down due to U.S. pressure, they started opening up shops in dark alleys. I remember going to one of those places one time. There was a guy who stood in front of the dark alley way (I think I was 12 years old at the time), and I swear there was a 3-carat diamond attached to each of the numbers on his Rolex (and every one of his teeth, it seemed like). Talk about heaven. Through all the cigarette smoke, I was able to make out things like NT5 alpha CDs and PlayStation games. Those were the days. Although it seemed like you needed pretty good English skills to open up one of these outfits, since most buyers were British or Australian.

    --
    There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
  13. This is ++good! by Scrameustache · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Boy scouts are about honor and doing what is right and about self reliance and about all other good things like that.

    Well, it's a para-military brigade that was originally advertised as a good way to keep young boy's hands busy (i.e. to prevent them... going blind).

    So it's a pretty good choice for an organisation who's been attempting through various means to indoctrinate the next generation into their view on copyrights.

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

    1. Re:This is ++good! by Your_Mom · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why do the submit and preview keys need to be so close?

      "Obviously spoken like someone who has either never been, or never participated in the program. Your blanket statement reminds me of when Microsoft globally condemns the work of OSS, without even know what it actually does."

      --
      Objects in the blog are closer then they ap
    2. Re:This is ++good! by 3terrabyte · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Hell, we just learned to race pine wood derbies, and how to have fun. It helps when your dad volunteers to be a scout master. Like they say... take an active step in raising your kids.

      Sorry yours had an agenda.

      --

      Why are there only 19 people folding@home for slashdot?

    3. Re:This is ++good! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, that's why not believing in God gets you kicked out of the Boy Scouts. No, serious, it does. If you say "I don't believe in God," you can no longer be considered a Boy Scout and will get kicked out of your troup.

      And pine wood derbies were for Cub Scouts, not Boy Scouts.

    4. Re:This is ++good! by Reignking · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Heck, some little idiot 12 year old said that I was Satanic because I was playing with candle wax. And I was kicked out for a month.

      --
      One man's Funny is another man's Offtopic.
  14. oh man... by dR.fuZZo · · Score: 2

    And I already had problems telling the two BSAs apart...

    --
    -- dR.fuZZo
  15. Hmmm... by 0x461FAB0BD7D2 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I know that Scouts learn by doing things, such as tying knots, building camp fires and so on.

    Does this mean they'll learn about IP by using BitTorrent, Exeem and so on? If so, about 70% of Hong Kong deserves that badge.

    1. Re:Hmmm... by SmokeHalo · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, the MPA believes that the easiest way to learn about IP is to compose cease & desist letters.

      --
      I'm not good in groups. It's difficult to work in a group when you're omnipotent. - Q
  16. What are the requirements? by pr0t0 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Apparently, you have to be able construct an FBI warning using nothing but your scarf, a pocketknife, and some damned-fine whittling.

    Please post yours below:

    --
    I'm sorry, but your opinion seems to be wrong.
  17. In other news, by DJCacophony · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The organization has also announced new available merit badges in the following categories:

    - Fascism
    - Lawsuits
    - Falsifying evidence
    - Misinterpreting technlologies they don't understand

    --
    Slow Down, Cowboy! It's been 60 minutes since you last successfully posted a comment.
  18. Little shits by Lord+Kano · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why in the hell would the scouts take a position on a politicized issue like this?

    This gives a whole new meaning to "Weblows"

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  19. As an Eagle Scout, by jockeys · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I feel compelled to say that this is utterly wrong. A scout is a lot of things. Trustworthy, loyal, helpful, friendly, courteous, kind, obedient, cheerful, thrifty, brave, clean, and reverent. But not "aware of copyright laws." I don't recall the Scout Oath containing anything about being a corporate shill for the recording industry; merely promising to do your duty to my God, my country, my community, and myself. This is absurd.

    --

    In Soviet Russia jokes are formulaic and decidedly non-humorous.
    1. Re:As an Eagle Scout, by xenocide2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't think that camping is part of the Scout Law either, but the merit badge does exist. And I fail to see how stamp collecting keeps one morally straight, mentally awake or physically fit.

      --
      I Browse at +4 Flamebait

      Open Source Sysadmin

  20. Those with tinfoil hats... by grumpygrodyguy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Those with tinfoil hats will surely be thinking of the youth in Orwell's 1984.

    Is it OK for those of us without tinfoil hats to think the same thing?

    --
    The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky
  21. Good Training... by ChaosCube · · Score: 2, Funny

    Personally, I can't think of anything better than training young people to rat out their friends and families, all the while standing up for the rights of IP owners like Disney. We don't want those poor Hollywood bums to go broke do we?

    Definitely Orwellian.

    --
    BDR Gear
    Outdoor gear, MREs, and more!
  22. Significantly Off Topic... by Humorously_Inept · · Score: 2, Funny

    Does the Hong Kong Boys Scouts Association have a drifting and automobile customization patch?

    --

    ~Someday, I hope to be an aspiring author.
  23. Brazil by JustinPrine · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Don't suspect a friend, report them."

  24. 1984? by tktk · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Those with tinfoil hats will surely be thinking of the youth in Orwell's 1984."

    Orwell was an optimist.

  25. Mod Me Down Troll (-1) by coolGuyZak · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What's next, a /. moderation merit badge?
    What's the point? Noone would qualify.

  26. Re:Criminal Element stemming from Boy Scouts? by h4rr4r · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That depends on what you mean by "criminal element". Not that long ago when I was a boyscout we copied songs and movies to tapes and shared them.(sure the MPAA would have loved to curb that) We also shared them electronically via ftp using our 9600 baud modems.(and we liked it, up hill both ways and whatnot) Plus there was the usual 12-16 year old stuff beer, pot smoking and ciggarette smoking. Since not much has probably changed in 10 years I would imagine these are the kids sharing movies and soon to be kids sharing movies that the MPAA would love to indoctrina^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H^H influence.

  27. Re:Criminal Element stemming from Boy Scouts? by Jason+Earl · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The real problem with P2P filesharing is that many people don't actually realize that it is illegal. I fix a lot of computers and I have lost track of the amount of times that I have mentioned to someone that they were guilty of distributing copyrighted material illegally only to have them look at me like a deer caught in someone's headlights. Some people understand that what they are doing is illegal, but lots of folks have no idea. These people thought that free music was one of the perks of having an Internet connection and were generally horrified once they learned that what they were doing was illegal.

    If it becomes second nature for even honest people to download bootleg music off the Internet then no amount of legislation or litigation is going to help the music industry (and later the television, movie, and publishing industries as well). So someone in the scouting organization is simply pointing out to these kids that disregarding copyrights is illegal and unethical. Personally I am hoping that this sort of thinking becomes more widespread. There is no question that the music industry is evil, but I don't think that throwing out copyrights is the answer.

  28. This is not what you think by some1somewhere · · Score: 3, Informative

    As usual, the media distorts the picture.

    Actually, this "badge" is useless. The number of kids going around buying copy PS2 games, CDs, etc. is amazing in Hong Kong. I'd say over 99% of PS2 games, software, DVDs, etc. in Hong Kong are copies/counterfeit. No doubt, they'll just get the badge and continue on their merry way as usual.

    Counterfeit software and goods is a way of life and culture in Hong Kong, China, and many places in Asia. You have "Woman's Street", which is an ENTIRE long street dedicated to fake goods. You even have police patrolling the area to keep it safe from pickpockets! But they are never shut down. Go there to find your "LV" bags, "Dior" rings, and "Rolex" watches.

    In fact, now that they have made it safer to go to these places, MORE tourists are turning up. There are less seedy types and more goods now.

    So I really think this is a pointless exercise. Now that China and HK are working together more, even MORE copy stuff is going to HK. And with HK's famous low crime rate and focus on making money and business, it is the IDEAL place to get these kind of things: total safe, cheap, available everywhere.

    --
    **FREE** Track and view your phone's via CellID and/or WIFI and/or GPS :- http://tinyurl.com/la6fhd
  29. GPL = IP ? by mosb1000 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Shouldn't that be included under the IP merit badge, since it protects the intellectual property of open source developers.

  30. Re:could be good or bad by 3terrabyte · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Maybe the scouts also get to learn about barratry, buying politicians, ripping off artists, and price fixing! Boy scouts might finally be able to outsell those Girl Scout Cookies!

    --

    Why are there only 19 people folding@home for slashdot?

  31. Computers Merit Badge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Note the current requirement #8 for Computers Merit Badge in the U.S.: http://www.meritbadge.com/mb/036.htm

  32. Morals? by mosb1000 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I thought the Boy Scouts were supposed to morals and leadership skills to future generations. I think respecting other peoples IP falls under the morals category. They already teach you not to plagiarize other peoples work, which is really the same thing, so I don't see why you find this so upsetting. I suppose next you were about to complain that they teach kids not to cheat on tests.

    1. Re:Morals? by Interrupt18 · · Score: 2

      Plagiarism, broadly, is passing off someones work as your own. In any context, it is easy to see why this is wrong (immoral).

      'IP' is defined differently depending on the country, organization etc. Learning to respect IP is very context dependant.

      The two are different.

  33. So, what are you working on ? by hey! · · Score: 2, Funny

    Scout A: I'm working on the whitewater kayaking badge.

    Scount B: I'm working on the wilderness survival badge.

    Scout C: I'm working on the Intellectual Property badge.

    Scouts A & B: Whoa! Cool!

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  34. Just a question by Sv-Manowar · · Score: 4, Interesting

    But who's this going to effect, the kids who go to Boy Scouts are more likely to be the ones who don't pirate films

    The kids who sit at home on Kazaa and doing stuff other than helpful 'community building' activites will be most of the people who pirate things. Nice targetting MPAA. doh!

  35. similar in the USA by delirium+of+disorder · · Score: 2, Interesting
    As an Eagle Scout who earned the "Computers" merit badge, I'm glad the Boy Scouts of America hasn't gotten this bad yet...However, the american computers merit badge isn't much better. It's quite outdated. The book pictures a 5 1/4-inch floppys and dot matrix printers as modern hardware. It also makes no refrence to GPL software including GNU/Linux. It implies software piracy is wrong but does not mention freedom and shareing as important values. Hopefully progress can be made. The free software movement is reaching out to scouting.

    http://www.linuxjournal.com/article/7813/

    The BSA needs to respond.

    --
    ------ Take away the right to say fuck and you take away the right to say fuck the government.
  36. Could be a good thing... by MaestroSartori · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...since surely the first step in changing unjustly-attained corporate sponsored IP law is educating people why it is such a bad thing in and of itself.

    "Copying a shitty CD will get me fined a billion dollars and raped in prison? That law sucks! Where do I sign up to change it?"

    Also, I don't know if scouts in other countries is much like scouts here in the UK, but we used to make our own music, perhaps they could encourage these kids to create stuff instead of stealing/copying-with-infringement (delete as applicable) the shit the corporate machine is spewing out.

  37. Or maybe you have things backwards by beer_maker · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Those with tinfoil hats will surely be thinking of the youth in Orwell's 1984.

    Or in Hitler's Germany.

    Ignoring the Goodwin's Law violation, you might ask yourself why Hitler created the Hitler Youth organization, when the Boy Scouts already existed in Germany. Perhaps it was because the Boy Scout organization had different goals, not in keeping with National Socialism? The Scouting Organization was (and is) not the problem

    Co-opting the youth is a common tactic for those that wish to exercise control over society. This is easy because the youth tend to be more gullible (sorry but its true, Pokemon anyone?).
    I would agree with the previous poster's point about lack of life experience rather than yours of gullibility - most kids are more idealistic that adults, not less. BTW, your "co-opting the youth" is another person's "getting the kids involved in the community", which we all think is fine when it's a Linux Installfest, right?
    The key question is why the education systems we all pay for are facilitating this (although perhaps not in this particular case, many schools in the US have also been willing channels for pro-intellectual property propaganda).
    Sorry, I don't get your point - what do Boy Scouts in Hong Kong have to do with "the educational system we all pay for" ... if you are posting from Hong Kong you might want to so indicate. I don't see any signs the US educational system is participating in this event at all. (Yes, I am posting from the US, as are most people reading this - not all, but definitely most.)
    --
    Hmmm. Your ideas are intriguing to me and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
  38. The thing that has me worried.. by Striikerr · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm just worried about this quote..
    " Those with tinfoil hats will surely be thinking of the youth in Orwell's 1984."

    I mean how did they know that I was thinking about the youth in Orwell's 1984 when I had my best tinfoil hat on?!? Obviously they have found a way to bypass the tried and true method to block mind control/reading.. Perhaps it's time to look towards different foil types?

  39. Boy scouts scare me by hyfe · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Partly offtopic, but I just have to say it:

    Boy scouts scare the shit out of me.

    Small children required to stand at attention, swearing oats they don't understand. Small children learning obidience to elders, to an organisation out of their parents control. Ever read about that anywhere? (this was a core element in italic/german fascism for the knowledge-impaired)

    Sure, the organisation is benign and all nice and stuff now, but will it stay that way?

    --
    "" How about taking the safety labels off everything, and let the stupidity-problem solve itself? """
    1. Re:Boy scouts scare me by CommieOverlord · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The Scout Promise

      On my honour,

      I promise that I will do my best,

      To do my Duty to God and the Queen,

      To help other people at all times,

      And to carry out the spirit of the Scout Law.

      The Scout Law

      A Scout is

      Helpful and trustworthy,

      Kind and cheerful,

      Considerate and clean,

      And wise in the use of all resources.

      You're right, that's pretty scary. "Do my best"? I mean that's obviously training them to be corporate pawns. "Kind and Cheerful"? What sort of Commie trick is that?

      The people running scouts ARE parents.

    2. Re:Boy scouts scare me by Edward+Faulkner · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Small children required to stand at attention, swearing oats they don't understand. Small children learning obidience to elders, to an organisation out of their parents control.

      Scouting is entirely within their parents control, because nobody can sign up without parental permission, and the vast majority of the people running things are parents.

      You comment does apply to public school however, where parents truly lack control, and children are truly taught to love and obey the State.

      For me, scouting was an excellent antidote to school. I got to accomplish real things. Unlike in school.

      --
      "The danger is not that a particular class is unfit to govern. Every class is unfit to govern." - Lord Acton
  40. Baden Powell would spin in his grave by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 4, Funny
    The Boy Scouts were formed to make boys of upright character to serve the military and the Empire well.

    The new Political Correctness, Explore Your Feminine Side, Gay Is OK, and now IP merit badges would surely make him choke on his undercooked damper-bread.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:Baden Powell would spin in his grave by periol · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Just because you think "upright character" doesn't include having a feminine side or homosexuality doesn't make you right.

      There are many paths to the truth. Some are more convoluted than others. Thank goodness the Boy Scouts have finally started to acknowledge that life doesn't come in one flavor. I don't like the IP merit badges anymore than the next geek, but at least my head isn't buried in the sand.

  41. Re:I have an idea for several by ed__ · · Score: 2, Funny

    how about

    Government Oppression Merit Badge (sponser: US/China/somecountryyoudon'tlike):
    Do all of the following:
    1. Become a party member
    2. Join a mob action intended to silence a group of citizens
    3. Burn books which have been found to be 'subversive'
    4. Find 6 subversive people in your family or community.
    5. Have them sent to work camps.

    other badges:
    Fascism Badge
    Torture Badge (US Army MP's/former South American regimes/school of the americas).
    WMD Search Merit Badge
    Using Fear as a Tool to dominate the citzenry Merit Badge(that one's a little long...think of better name: Better Living through Fear Merit Badge).
    Internet Censorship Badge (China again!)
    Regime Change Badge

    Foreign Intelligence Merit Badge (CIA/Pentagon)
    do two of the following:
    1. make up shit
    2. fact check maybe
    3. invade someone's 3rd world ass

    hopefully everyone has been offended. if not please take the next 5 minutes to offend yourself.

  42. But it's not a binary world by PCM2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That's a slippery slope you're heading down. Public funds are often used to promote things that are ostensibly in the public interest, but may not hold up to individual scrutiny 100 percent of the time. You might not like it that your local public library keeps copies of "Mein Kampf" and "Huckleberry Finn," but I would argue that a library system that doesn't carry those books on principle is not a library system at all. I might not agree that teaching abstinence is the best way to prevent pregnancy and transmission of STDs among teenagers, but I'm willing to have my tax dollars support groups that teach abstinence to teens, regardless of my opinion of their underlying political slant, because the benefits of teaching abstinence probably outweigh the negatives. (In other words, it's worth a try.) Similarly, you might not agree with everything the Boy Scouts teach, but as an institution it's probably done more good for more boys than it has done harm. It seems a little harsh to suggest pulling public funding on the basis of your personal opinions about the organization's ideology. That way of thinking isn't too far from the idea of withholding public arts funding from art that isn't to your personal taste (something else I disagree with). The world just isn't binary like that. Very few things are "all good" or "all bad," so why insist on trying to impose all-or-nothing solutions on them?

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
  43. Licking 30,000 stamps will keep you moral. by purduephotog · · Score: 2, Funny

    You try licking 30,000 stamps. 3 calories apiece, that'll keep you up all night and you're gonna have to be quite an exercise bug to get that weight off.

    And with those impressive tongue muscles, you might as well stay morally straight because the women are gonna LOVE you....

    Then again, maybe stamp collecting should be a girl scout badge...

  44. Re:Criminal Element stemming from Boy Scouts? by Jason+Earl · · Score: 2, Insightful

    We already have way too much content, and almost all of it is crap.

    I tend to agree that popular music is crap. However, millions of people disagree (which is why the music is "popular"). Either way, disregarding someone else's copyrights is hardly ethical.

    These industries could use some extensive thinning out.

    Which is why I support artists that are outside of the mainstream. There is plenty of quality music where the artists are happy to let you download their work. I support these artists financially because that is the ethical way to change the music industry. Disregarding copyrights doesn't help anyone. It simply makes it more likely that laws will be passed that force DRM down all of our throats. I may disagree with the musicians that turn their copyrighted material over to the music industry, but it's a choice they made of their own free will. I know that I would be upset if someone used my copyrighted material contrary to my wishes. You simply can't claim the moral high ground while going against the wishes of the folks that created the music in the first case.

    Basically, just because I don't like the music industry doesn't give me the right to violate their copyrights.

  45. Strange... by 28481k · · Score: 2, Informative

    I couldn't find the details about this badge anywhere in the http://www.scout.org.hk/. Apperantly they have not uploaded the details of this new badge or they're not enthusiastic about it.

    From the Standard [1], this badge is NOT a MERIT BADGE. It's a proficiency badge which you cannot put it on the scout shirt. Besides, what you only need to do is to attend a series of seminars/indoctrinations as you see fit, and vola, you got the badge. The local media did try not to twist the story too much. So it's not really a matter of brainwashing after all, and Slashdotters should not really go crazy about this subject. Besides, some1somewhere was right on his post #12424010 http://politics.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=14823 3&cid=12424010, this does not really matter anyway because no one would really care.

    The HK SAR government seems to be quite enthusiastic about this and issued a press release [2].

    References:
    [1] http://www.thestandard.com.hk/stdn/std/Metro/GE04A k06.html
    [2] http://www.info.gov.hk/gia/general/200504/30/04290 171.htm

    --
    28481k
  46. Re:Not Theft is still Not Theft by serutan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    1. This isn't court, it's a discussion forum.
    2. I wasn't defending copyright infringement, I was explaining how it's not "theft," and why I think it's important not to call it theft.
    3. By posting my opinions here, I am lobbying to change the law.

  47. Scout's Honor by mattr · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Now might be a good time to review what scouting is about according to this site showing the Eagle Scout ceremony. Sounds a lot like some stuff I've read at gnu.org about being thrifty, loyal to family and friends, helpful, well just about all of them.

    Maybe it would be a good time to make a Knoppix CD for scouts? Help them get the computing merit badge and maybe a few others? I loved scouting until I dropped out because of a shitty group and gave up my hopes for an Eagle, but you could do worse than use free software to help more geeks get merit badges and get Eagle Scout free software evangelists. Actually it would seem to be natural to use free software if you are going to limit copying to that which can be done legally.

    A Scout is TRUSTWORTHY: A Scout tells the truth. He keeps his promises. Honesty is a part of his code of conduct. People can always depend on him.

    LOYAL: A Scout is true to his family, friends, Scout leaders, school, nation, and world community.

    HELPFUL: A Scout is concerned about other people. He willingly volunteers to help others without expecting payment or reward.

    FRIENDLY: A Scout is a friend to all. He is a brother to other Scouts. He seeks to understand others. He respects those with ideas and customs that are different from his own.

    COURTEOUS: A Scout is polite to everyone regardless of age or position. He knows that good manners make it easier for people to get along.

    KIND: A Scout understands there is strength in being gentle. He treats others as he wants to be treated. He does not harm or kill anything without reason.

    OBEDIENT: A Scout follows the rules of his family, school and troop. He obeys the laws of his community and country. If he thinks these rules and laws are unfair, he tries to have them changed in an orderly manner rather than disobey them.

    CHEERFUL: A Scout looks for the bright side of life. He cheerfully does tasks that come his way. He tries to make others happy.

    THRIFTY: A Scout works to pay his way and to help others. He saves for the future. He protects and conserves natural resources. He carefully uses time and property.

    BRAVE: A Scout can face danger even if he is afraid. He has the courage to stand for what he thinks is right even if others laugh at or threaten him.

    CLEAN: A Scout keeps his body and mind fit and clean. He goes around with those who believe in living by these same ideals. He helps keep his home and community clean.

    REVERENT: A Scout is reverent toward God. He is faithful in his religious duties. He respects the beliefs of others.

  48. Scouting and free software by Lou_Crazy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It can be argued that the ideals of scouting are much more related to the free software / opensource movement than to the current abuses of intellectual property (which isn't bad in itself).

    This is the point raised by Marco Fioretti in his two articles on LinuxJournal:

    http://www.linuxjournal.com/article.php?sid=7533

    http://www.linuxjournal.com/article.php?sid=7813

    Maybe these articles would make a good Slashdot story!