Slashdot Mirror


From Carnivore to Herbivore

smooth wombat wrote in to mention an a recent discovery in the field of evolutionary biology. From the article: "A surprising discovery in Utah has paleontologists scratching their heads and asking: Why would a carnivore evolve a herbivorous diet? The species, christened Falcarius utahensis, belongs to a dinosaur group called the therizinosauroids. These are mostly thought to have been plant eaters. But the recently discovered fossil, the most primitive therizinosauroid found so far, seems to have survived on a mixed diet of meat and vegtables...The switch to vegetarianism is surprising, says Paul Barrett, who studies dinosaurs at the Natural History Museum in London. The therizinosauroids belong to a larger group of dinosaurs known as theropods, and many of these are known to have been excellent at catching a meaty meal. "

57 of 347 comments (clear)

  1. Intelligent Design? by poopdeville · · Score: 5, Funny

    Maybe the designer wasn't so intelligent after all, seeing as how he kept changing his mind.

    --
    After all, I am strangely colored.
    1. Re:Intelligent Design? by Gentlewhisper · · Score: 4, Funny

      Nah.. the species just decided to be a Buddhist instead...

    2. Re:Intelligent Design? by poopdeville · · Score: 2, Funny

      Mod parent up. That was among the most inciteful things I've ever read.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    3. Re:Intelligent Design? by mikael · · Score: 2, Funny

      The designer subcontracted out the project, but the contractors went bankrupt, so another contractor stepped in with an off-the-shelf design.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    4. Re:Intelligent Design? by ThJ · · Score: 2, Funny

      Testing universe? I'm afraid this is it.

    5. Re:Intelligent Design? by schtum · · Score: 2, Funny

      And the fact that the fossil record shows this species moving from a carnivore to herbivore over time is just further proof that all fossils are planted by the Devil to sow doubt into the heart of mankind.

      Thank you, I'll be here all night! Try the veal!

  2. Hah. by King_of_Prussia · · Score: 5, Funny

    The next time somebody waxes on about the virtues of the Atkin's Diet I can tell them that even the dinosaurs got sick of it.

    --

    Making the moon less necessary since 1998.

    1. Re:Hah. by aszaidi · · Score: 4, Funny

      The next time somebody waxes on about the virtues of the Atkin's Diet I can tell them that even the dinosaurs got sick of it.

      And look what happened to them.

  3. Not strictly vegetarian. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Not just vegetarian, but omnivorous.

    "Although the team cannot know whether Falcarius was a committed vegetarian - it may have eaten a bit of meat, too - its emergence did coincide neatly with the evolution of flowering plants."

    Why evolve to eat plants and animals? I dunno, but it works for me too!

    "At the same time Falcarius appeared, the world was changing greatly because flowering plants were appearing," Dr Sampson said. "They would have provided a new food source. It could be that Falcarius was exploiting an open ecological niche."

    1. Re:Not strictly vegetarian. by dr+eldritch · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What occurs to me is that the incorporation of vegetation into dinosaur diets was probably just an accidental byproduct of aquatic grazing. If fish or other small prey regularly hid within shoreline plants, then it would seem more energy efficient for dinosaurs to grab a mouthful of the plantlife that was hiding the prey too. Natural selection would have probably favored such aquatic grazers by selecting teeth and digestive systems that were most suited for grabbing a mouthful of seaweed or kelp or whathaveyou that contained animals. There might have been some unforseen benefits of eating plants too, such as additional nutritional supplements, so natural selection pressures were reinforced to a greater degree.

      --
      out through the in door
  4. Why is this so confusing? by Lordfly · · Score: 4, Insightful

    In biology class, one of the things you learn is that plants have the most energy-to-size ratio (i forget the actual term). Then you have the primary group of animals (cows, rabbits, anything that eats plants), then the first tier of carnivores (animals that eat the plant eaters), then you have another tier that eats the first tier of carnivores (us, generally).

    As you go up the food chain, you get less energy from the meat.

    So perhaps this animal simply decided that munching on grass was more efficient than killing a T-rex?

    Josh

    --
    hookers and grits.
    1. Re:Why is this so confusing? by EtherAlchemist · · Score: 4, Insightful


      Another thing learned in basic biology is that an animal, when faced with starvation, will eat what it can, when it can. If the supply of smaller meaty dinos was dwindling or the range of the Falcarius expanded into an area were there were more plants than animals, and the plants could be eaten- then why not?

      This isn't a new or even novel behaviour- cats and dogs are generally considered carnivores thought both will eat plants to get nutrients and fiber when they need them.

      People are the same way- we evolved eating meat most of the year and plants when meat was scarce. We (and many other animals) CAN eat both because we're built that way.

      --
      R(k)
    2. Re:Why is this so confusing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      >>As you go up the food chain, you get less energy >>from the meat.

      There are a couple of other trade-offs involved that make it less simple. "Pure" energy is converted less efficiently into meat, yes. But digesting meat as opposed to vegetables can be easier (less celulose) and allow simplification of digestive structures (drop the appendix, ditto multiple stomachs). Meat converts more efficiently into energy. Herbivores have to eat in bulk and spend most of their time foraging or digesting. Carnivores can go longer without food. But they have to hunt the stuff down.

      I don't think this is confusing either - the balance can tip either way based on circumstances.

    3. Re:Why is this so confusing? by flyingsquid · · Score: 2, Informative
      I could be wrong on this, but I am almost positive that nothing eats carnivores. Carnivores only eat herbivores and not other carnivores.

      Whales are carnivores, eating krill and other small animals. Sea lions are carnivores, eating fish. Killer whales eat them both.

    4. Re:Why is this so confusing? by superpulpsicle · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If it tastes like chicken, why not just eat chicken. Why get all exotic over the same taste.

    5. Re:Why is this so confusing? by bahwi · · Score: 2, Informative

      Dog, cat. Yes, not here, but in other parts of the world, they do. Many fish eat other fish. Grilled shark is a good reason to not be vegetarian for a few days for me. =)

    6. Re:Why is this so confusing? by Muhammar · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Rabbits have a simple digestive structure. Their trick is to eat food twice - they are quite fond of their own poop. Something like 50% of their poop ends up re-eaten, depending on their actual nutritional needs. The same goes for rats.

      --
      I doubt that we will ever figure out - and I suspect that even if we did figure out we couldn't do much about it
    7. Re:Why is this so confusing? by NegativeOneUserID · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ok. I admit to being wrong. Carnivores *DO* eat carnivores.

      I would, however, like to point out where I got the idea from. An old girlfriend of mine claimed that oral sex was always better if you were going down on a vegetarian. Her theory was that anything coming out of the body of a carnivore is going to taste terrible. The sperm/meat of a herbivore is much more delicious.

      It sounded like a reasonable explanation at the time.

    8. Re:Why is this so confusing? by Farrside · · Score: 2, Funny

      There went breakfast.

    9. Re:Why is this so confusing? by noewun · · Score: 2, Funny

      Now you tell me. I just flushed a snack!

      --
      I am a believer of momentum and curves.
  5. Dang by skilm · · Score: 3, Funny

    I didn't know PETA has been around that long...

  6. goD put that fossil by $exyNerdie · · Score: 2, Funny


    goD put that omnivore fossil out there to confuse scientists and test the faith of evangelists. hE had so much free time after creation that he wanted to play some tricks and enjoy looking at the morons that hE created for hiS amusement.

  7. Carnivorous isn't superior by vlad_petric · · Score: 5, Insightful
    For example, "lions can spend as much time as 20 hours per day sleeping" -- wikipedia. At the same time, a gnu antilope (not GNU/Antilope) needs only about 6 hours of sleep per night. And yes, this is because of their diet.

    Furthermore, the chain for a carnivore is simply longer by one (plants->herbivores->carnivore)

    --

    The Raven

    1. Re:Carnivorous isn't superior by scotch · · Score: 5, Funny
      Furthermore, the chain for a carnivore is simply longer by one (plants->herbivores->carnivore)

      The way I look at it, I'm a vegetarian, but cows are part of my extended digestive tract.

      --
      XML causes global warming.
    2. Re:Carnivorous isn't superior by Farmer+Tim · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Required sleep time isn't really a measure of superiority; perhaps lions sleep up to 20 hours a day because they can.

      --
      Blank until /. makes another boneheaded UI decision.
    3. Re:Carnivorous isn't superior by limon.verde · · Score: 2, Informative

      So do Koala Bears, and they only eat leaves. Which proves what?

    4. Re:Carnivorous isn't superior by pipingguy · · Score: 2, Funny


      As the top level predator (excluding man, of course) in Africa the male lion can afford to snooze away most of the day while his female does most of the work. No different from humans in western civ.

    5. Re:Carnivorous isn't superior by roseblood · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, I think he is saying Lions are farmers.

      --
      There are lies, damned lies, and statistics.
  8. Carnivore... by Etherwalk · · Score: 5, Funny

    Am I the only one that saw the headline and thought of a new FBI internet tap with a friendly plant-like image?

  9. Two simple reasons. by khasim · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Why evolve to eat plants and animals? I dunno, but it works for me too!

    Potatoes don't run fast or put up much of a fight.

    A given amount of land can support more grazers than carnivores.

    Switching to an omnivorous diet means that there will be more of them.

    1. Re:Two simple reasons. by Urkki · · Score: 2, Funny
      • Potatoes don't run fast or put up much of a fight.

      Apparently you haven't met some of the potatoes they served at school cafeteria back when I was in primary school...
    2. Re:Two simple reasons. by Muhammar · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Potatoes don't run fast or put up much of a fight"

      Thats what *you* think. Did you ever live under socialism in Soviet Russia?

      --
      I doubt that we will ever figure out - and I suspect that even if we did figure out we couldn't do much about it
  10. Pandas by Theovon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Correct me if I'm wrong, but pandas eat mostly bamboo, but they evolved from carnivores and are still enticed by the smell of meat.

    So how is this anything new?

    1. Re:Pandas by JollyGoodChase · · Score: 3, Funny

      Pandas...Nature's koalas

  11. Not that surprising. by Sheetrock · · Score: 3, Interesting
    There are environmental pressures to carnivorism for species that are climbing the food chain because of competition, and environmental pressures to herbivorism for those who top it for longevity (running out of lower elements on the chain to eat.)

    Humans, incidentally, have been natural herbivores for hundreds of thousands of years -- one can live longer and healthier as a vegetarian than as a carnivore strictly speaking. But we are considered omnivores because our bodies can tolerate meat as well as plant matter. It is not surprising to see a similar evolution taking place in other species as well; what is surprising is our relative level of resistance to this fact.

    --

    Try not. Do or do not, there is no try.
    -- Dr. Spock, stardate 2822-3.




    1. Re:Not that surprising. by xenocide2 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Humans, incidentally, have been natural herbivores for hundreds of thousands of years

      Ah yes, you bring to mind the ancient cave paintings of carrots, apples and bottled water. Your statement is further backed up by general recommendations that modern strict vegetarians take vitamin supplments to alleviate the deficiencies in Vitamins B12 and D.

      --
      I Browse at +4 Flamebait

      Open Source Sysadmin

    2. Re:Not that surprising. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      >alleviate the deficiencies in Vitamins B12 and D

      Vitamin D is a hormone you synthesize in your skin from exposure to ultraviolet light (usually from the Sun). You might be interested to know that Vitamin D is ADDED to milk as a supplement.

      B12 is from bacteria in soil. Historically it was also present in running water as it erodes soil. Modern agriculture depletes topsoil and consumers over-clean produce; historically you would eat a little dirt and thus get the B12, which has an RDA in MICROgrams.

      Staying indoors and avoiding dirt are both side-effects of modern living, but evolutionarily, there is no reason being a plant-eating human would cause a deficit of these nutrients.

      Modern life makes up for shortcomings with a pill. So, take your pick.

    3. Re:Not that surprising. by cliffy2000 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      B12 is naturally found from bacterial sources (i.e., animal liver, etc.) -- the main problem in getting it is that we are too clean. (Interestingly enough, people who don't wash their hands after using the bathroom will have less likelihood of developing a B-12 deficiency...)

      And I'm pretty sure we can get Vitamin D by staying in the sun. So, from an evolutionary standpoint, it seems that vegetarianism (veganism, really) would be a primary method of food consumption.

    4. Re:Not that surprising. by figgypower · · Score: 3, Interesting
      You seem to be preaching vegetarian superiority without anything to back up your claim. Humans are omnivores, because we're smart (i.e. we learned quickly to evolve in such a manner or we die off). Being an omnivore gives us the best strategy for survival, period. Indeed eating plants can be more efficient for a human's diet and it certainly provides valueable nutrients not otherwise available. However, our brains evolved to its current state thanks to a compact source of lots of protiens and many calories -- meat.

      Refrences:

      Should American Eat Less Meat

      Humans Head Start [it's a PDF!] I'll even concede the meat might've more likely been fish met, but it was meat.

      Did African Hominids Eat Meat We're not really natural herbivores at all...

      I'm sure I can Google more out if necessary. We had a natural inclination towards meet as our food stuff became distributed over a wider area. We didn't have the ability to fight for the food stuff with larger animals, so we turned to meet.

      I also realize that there is one piece of conflicting evidence to all this. Richard Wrangham and a few of his colleagues have argued that cooked tubers were really responsible for the massive growth of our ancestors' brains. The problem? This massive brain growth was roughly 1.8 million years ago (which Wrangham agrees), but at best we were able to control fire about 300,000 years ago. Quite a disparity. Not to mention that there's no archaelogical proof of such a diet.

    5. Re:Not that surprising. by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Why not just get your B vitamins from eating yeast products like whole grain bread?

      --

      ___
      It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
  12. Not really by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 3, Informative
    In biology class, one of the things you learn is that plants have the most energy-to-size ratio (i forget the actual term). Then you have the primary group of animals (cows, rabbits, anything that eats plants), then the first tier of carnivores (animals that eat the plant eaters), then you have another tier that eats the first tier of carnivores (us, generally).

    That's not quite how it works. Plants have to photosynthesize enough to grow and maintain "operations," herbivores have to eat enough plants to grow and maintain "operations," etc. Eventually a top predator is ultimately eating a lot of plants more because there are a lot of middlemen.


    As you go up the food chain, you get less energy from the meat.

    There's generally more energy in meat, and it's denser so you spend a lot less time eating meat calories. Of course, finding and killing that meat is a different story. I expect the answer to our question is one of relative scarcity or competitive ability - perhaps a different predator took away the market?

    But it's not one of energy density, most definitely.

  13. From the Prey's Point of View ... by rewinn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Plants often use predation by another species to facilitate their reproduction, e.g. bird excrement spreads seeds. So perhaps focussing on the dinos has it backwards ... the plants have a positive incentive to encourage the saurians to try a little salad with their mammalburger.

  14. How is any of this surprising by benzapp · · Score: 4, Informative

    No mammal or reptile is strictly a "vegetarian". None of these animals can convert cellulose into glucose, they ALL require bacteria to do this for them. It is obvious why some animals evolved to eat plants: there simply wasn't enough meat available for them to consume. Over time, their bodies evolved adaptions such as larger and multiple stomachs to regulate the gas biproducts of bacterial decomposition of cellulose. This is why humans have to cook their food, we simply cannot survive on a truly natural vegetarian diet. Our stomachs are too small.

    Without exception, all animals can eat meat. Even the cow retains the ability to produce bile acids to break down fat, the primary source of energy for most predator mammals.

    --
    I don't read or respond to AC posts
    1. Re:How is any of this surprising by roman_mir · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is why humans have to cook their food, we simply cannot survive on a truly natural vegetarian diet - then I don't exist? 10 years on uncooked vegetables (my university days trained me to eat only once a day also.)

    2. Re:How is any of this surprising by benzapp · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What percentage of your caloric intake came from those vegetables? Very few.

      Sit down and eat a pound of carrots, one of the few vegetables with a relatively high sugar content you CAN eat raw. You will not feel very good and you will have consumed hardly enough to live on.

      If you think about it carefully, you weren't eating a vegetarian diet like a cow. You likely used olive oil, and did consume a larger quantity of cooked grains(like bread) than you care to admit. Especially since you claim to eat once a day, I tend to thik that is the case. Even three avocados at that meal will hardly provide the minimum caloric intake an adult male requires to survive.

      By natural, I am referring to a diet that doesn't require technology, either the knowledge of fire, a cooking implement, or an olive press.

      Now, it is possible that you are a small person and physically inactive. If that is the case, you could conceiveably get by with 1200 calories a day. That is also unnatural as that level of inactivity is only possible due to technology making physical work largely unnecessary.

      --
      I don't read or respond to AC posts
  15. Butthead Dinosaur by pipingguy · · Score: 2, Interesting


    This was hard to track down. Listening to the original description on discovery.ca (TV) I couldn't help but think about Stampy from the Simpsons (1F15).

  16. All the fitness that's new. by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If more energy were available in its environment in plant form than in animal, especially in a sustainable diet, a more fit sauroid would eat plants rather than meat. Evolution doesn't develop towards any goal - it merely is the survival of species more fit to survive in their environment, who get to reproduce and perpetuate their genes. The environment changes, including the evolution and extinction of species depended upon by others, who must then fit a changed environment. Fitness is a game that never ends.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  17. Odd by Wrexs0ul · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Which is the ultimate joke seeing as how we were made in his image, yet considering all our views on the subject obviously not his sense of humour.

    Holy mental seg. fault batman.

    -Matt

    --
    --- Need web hosting?
  18. Which pretty much makes me a vegetarian... by 19thNervousBreakdown · · Score: 5, Funny

    Obviously, Falcarius utahensis got a girlfriend.

    Tomato and spinach pizza, wtf.

    --
    <xml><I><am><so><damn>Web 2.0</damn></so></am></I></xml>
  19. So where do you get your B12 from? by Hamster+Lover · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Now I am not an authority on this, but vitamin B12 is only found in amounts sufficient for our dietary needs in animal products like meat, fish, eggs, and dairy and is essential for proper nervous system function. If you're one of the "strict" vegetarians out there you must supplement your all vegetable diet with B12 or run the risk of developing nerve damage or neurological disease (among other complications). You cannot meet all of your dietary requirements from an all-vegetable diet unless you take supplements.

    While I would agree that a vegetarian diet is certainly healthier than what most people eat, the fact is a balanced diet from all the food groups including animal products is not only wise but absolutely necessary for a healthy human body. If my memory of biology class is correct just about every herbivore has to eat an enormous amount of plant material to sustain themselves, with specialized digestive sytems. Why do you think a cow has four stomachs?

    I watched my sister fade away on a stict vegan diet and even with supplements it wasn't enough. She re-introduced a weekly serving of meat and noticed a huge improvement in her mood and energy level. Her experience taught me that a balanced diet is more important than focusing on any one particular food group and my diet is the better for it.

    1. Re:So where do you get your B12 from? by alexander+m · · Score: 2, Informative

      veganism is a LOT harder than straight vegetarianism -- access to dairy and eggs makes everything a lot more straightforward, and problems with energy levels are much less common (in fact if you suffer from that, you're clearly missing something). however, you can get veggie B12 from nutritional yeast (saccharomyces cerevisiae), which you can take as supplement, fortified cereals, and fortified (soy) milk.

      i've been vegetarian --no meat, no fish-- for 18 months now, and to bo honest it's very easy to get a good balanced diet. you just need to do a little bit of research first so you don't make the classic mistakes (eg: replace a lot of the meat with dairy/cheese as this inhibits vitamin uptake).

      still, no plans to go vegan -- the potential pitfalls, as it seems your sister found out, are much larger.

    2. Re:So where do you get your B12 from? by roman_mir · · Score: 2, Informative

      10 years as a strict vegetarian with no supplements and mostly eating my vegetables raw (and university life taught me to eat only once a day to save time,) still alive and kicking, but I guess I shouldn't be alive or should be a nervous wreck by now? Hmmm.

  20. Bullshit? by akincisor · · Score: 2, Funny

    So you're saying you eat bullshit? Are you a lawyer? :)

  21. Re:Most Herbivores are Omnivores. by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

    Have you ever seen a cow go, "OH My God! There's a ladybug on that grass, I'm not eating it!"

    Yes, as a matter of fact I have. Many times. Except in their dialect it comes out as "Moooo Moo Mo Mooooo Moo Mooo MooMoo".

  22. Re: Intelligent Design and Vegetarianism by some+guy+I+know · · Score: 2, Funny
    Maybe the designer wasn't so intelligent after all, seeing as how he kept changing his mind.
    I think that it was probably due less to "intelligent design" flaws, and more to the dinosaurs saying, "You know, our prey are feeling beings, and therefore it is unethical to use them for food when other means are available for meeting our dietary requirements.".
    I know that that's why I became a vegetarian, and what's good enough for me was probably good enough for dinosaurs.
    --
    Those who sacrifice security to condemn liberty deserve to repeat history or something. - Benjamin Santayana
  23. Damn smug vegetarians... by fmaxwell · · Score: 2, Funny

    This sucks. My vegetarian friends will soon be telling me that the therizinosauroids would still be alive today if they hadn't started eating meat.

  24. Re:works for me by DarkAvZ · · Score: 2, Insightful
    From TFL:
    An almond is also the fruit of this tree

    I mean no disrespect, but your argument seems a tad bit moronic. Where do you think almods (or nuts for that matter) came from? You know (or you should know), in "the wild" is where you can find these thingies called "trees", that provide you with almods or nuts.

    PS: I never claimed to be a vegetarian on health grounds ;)
    PS2: Nuts being worse than meat, you must be joking right? (if not, would you care to post a link?)

    --
    09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0