Slashdot Mirror


Black Hole Birth Detected this Morning

An anonymous reader writes "SPACE.com is reporting on the first optical afterglow ever detected from a short-duration (milliseconds) Gamma-Ray Burst. The GRB signals the birth of a black hole resulting from a merger between two neutron stars. Theory had predicted the whole thing, which was all spotted this morning by NASA's Swift satellite and ground-based observatories, thanks to an automated email system that notifies astronomers worldwide."

78 of 337 comments (clear)

  1. Upon Further Review... by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Funny

    The Gamma ray burst was determined to emitted from a very large cigarette lighter igniting a very, very large cigarette. SETI recorded the first successfully detected extraterrestrial broadcast of a message, which they believe was "Was it good for you, too?" Bachelor and bachelorette scientists around the world are extremely puzzeled and have few clues as to what it all means.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:Upon Further Review... by falzer · · Score: 4, Funny

      Scientists say these new findings strengthen the "big bang" theory.

    2. Re:Upon Further Review... by g-san · · Score: 2, Funny

      You can't smoke in space, silly.

    3. Re:Upon Further Review... by Nos. · · Score: 5, Funny

      Geez, they said I couldn't smoke in planes, then theatres, now restaurants. Now I can't smoke in space? This is getting out of hand!

    4. Re:Upon Further Review... by learn+fast · · Score: 4, Funny

      Next you'll be telling me that you can't smoke in ANY vacuum.

    5. Re:Upon Further Review... by BigDogCH · · Score: 2, Funny

      Either way, it is old news.

      "it actually took place 2.2 billion years ago"

  2. email notification by Eric+Smith · · Score: 3, Funny
    Unfortunately the email notification didn't get to most of astronomers, because AOL's spam filter blocked the message due to the subject line "A special powful astronomical object".

    It's unclear whether the newborn is a boy or a girl, but what is known is that it has no hair.

  3. Mother and baby are doing fine by winkydink · · Score: 4, Funny

    Dad's a little dazed...

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    1. Re:Mother and baby are doing fine by weighn · · Score: 2, Funny

      what sort of cruel parents would name a child "GRB050509b"?!

      --
      Mongrel News all the news that fits and froths
  4. Er... by Avyakata · · Score: 5, Informative

    Wasn't there another slashdot article a few weeks ago about how blackholes don't exist? I think it was talking about this report.

    1. Re:Er... by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Wasn't there another slashdot article a few weeks ago about how blackholes don't exist? I think it was talking about this report.

      Let's rename them 'Schrödinger's holes' - They may or may not exist. Seems to fit in with a lot of the battling theories.

      Our astronomy club hosted a local speaker, studying the lives of black holes, where the entire cycle was explored. Pretty cool stuff. I'll try to remember his name and find a link.

      they should put these doctoral types on american gladiator and have them defend their theories!

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  5. "You've Got a Black Hole!" by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 4, Funny

    They had to tune down their email spam filter to let that one through...

    --

    They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
  6. automated email system that notifies astronomers by Typingsux · · Score: 4, Funny
    See hot teen neutron stars get it on.


    No credit card required click for details.

    --
    The above post is an editorial, the poster cannot and will not be held responsible for all or in part for it's contents
  7. presents by Umbral+Blot · · Score: 2, Funny

    What kind of gifts do you get for a super massive object? You don't want to make mom and dad angry, that is for sure.

    1. Re:presents by seven+of+five · · Score: 3, Funny

      ... just don't promise her the Moon....

  8. The mother by Timesprout · · Score: 4, Funny

    will require serious stitching or no star will want to merge with her again.

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
    1. Re:The mother by Murdoc · · Score: 2, Funny
      Are you kidding? She's much more attractive now than she ever was before.

      Funny though how in space this attractiveness doesn't depend on looks...

      --
      Our ignorance is not so vast as our failure to use what we know. - M. King Hubbert
  9. The details... by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 4, Funny

    The black hole was a noningth of an inch in length and weighed about the same as a large star.

    --
    If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
  10. Re:Terrible Secrect of Space? by ackthpt · · Score: 4, Funny
    Grossest. Dept. Ever.

    That's what I thought when I heard about Paula Abdul on Idol... this is how burned out old stars on earth behave, they attemt to merge with younger, brighter stars. A little titillation and BAM(!) their radiating again and the envy of all their neighboring dying stars.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  11. If you hear the bomb fall... by RobertB-DC · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I read somewhere about workers at an Army ammunition plant. A newbie came on, and was being shown around his area of responsibility, when there was a loud metallic CLANG, as some object in the warehouse full of high explosives dropped to the floor. The newbie instinctively dove to the ground has his compatriots chuckled. As he stood back up, they told him, "If you hear it hit the floor, it didn't explode."

    Looks like this one was a dud. Lucky much?

    --
    Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    1. Re:If you hear the bomb fall... by thePjunisher · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Inverse square... Yeah, so what? You fail to realise just how much energy a supernova releases... If one goes bang 5000 light years away, you'll be able to see it burning bright even during the day. But within a thousand lightyears... We really would never know what hit us...

  12. Outstanding! by east+coast · · Score: 2, Funny

    I told Rosie O'Donnell not to eat that last HoHo... Looks what she's done now!

    --
    Dedicated Cthulhu Cultist since 4523 BC.
  13. What about Dr. Reinhardt? by Deinhard · · Score: 3, Funny

    Too bad the Cygnus wasn't there to watch!

    --
    Successfully condensing fact from the vapor of nuance since 1998.
    1. Re:What about Dr. Reinhardt? by Eccles · · Score: 5, Funny

      Dating yourself, eh?

      This is slashdot. It's not like anyone else will date us.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
  14. Weak! by The+Woodworker · · Score: 5, Funny

    It happened 2.2 billion years ago. Slashdot really needs to try and stay current.

    --
    Give a man a fish and he'll eat for a day. Teach him to fish and he'll wipe out the species.
    1. Re:Weak! by killjoe · · Score: 4, Funny

      " It happened 2.2 billion years ago"

      YOu better let the Kansas school board know about this. The universe is only about 3000 years old don't you know.

      --
      evil is as evil does
  15. Wait a minute... by dfn5 · · Score: 4, Funny
    Slashdot just told me that black hole's don't exist. I don't know what to think anymore.

    --
    -- Thou hast strayed far from the path of the Avatar.
    1. Re:Wait a minute... by FidelCatsro · · Score: 4, Funny

      Rimmer: But a Black Hole's a huge, compacted star! It's millions of miles wide! Why didn't you see it on the radar screen?
      Holly: Well, the thing about a Black Hole, its main distinguishing feature, is it's black. And the thing about space, your basic space colour is black. So how are you supposed to see them?
      Rimmer: But five of them! How can you be ambushed by five Black Holes?
      Holly: Always the way, isn't it? You hang around in deep space for three million years and you don't see one. Then, all of a sudden, five all turn up at once.

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    2. Re:Wait a minute... by Skye16 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I hate to ask this and lose whatever geek credibility I *may* have had, but what is this from? I have a feeling I'd love to check it out.

    3. Re:Wait a minute... by Black.Shuck · · Score: 5, Informative

      Red Dwarf, Season 3, Episode 2 "Marooned."

    4. Re:Wait a minute... by FidelCatsro · · Score: 3, Informative

      RedDwarf ,Cult Sci-fi comedy from the UK ;) out on DVD and VHS and most likely other places and ways

      http://www.reddwarf.co.uk/

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
  16. Happy Birthday! by nizo · · Score: 4, Funny

    I almost put up a big "Happy Birthday you Big Black Hole" banner at work as a joke, but luckily I found out beforehand that one of my co-workers has a birthday today. I am guessing that banner wouldn't have gone over too well with him.

    1. Re:Happy Birthday! by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 4, Funny

      I almost put up a big "Happy Birthday you Big Black Hole" banner at work as a joke, but luckily I found out beforehand that one of my co-workers has a birthday today. I am guessing that banner wouldn't have gone over too well with him.

      Especially if he also happens to be a large gay afro-american...

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
  17. The whole hole? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
    Theory had predicted the whole thing

    Didn't you mean "theory had predicted the hole thing" ?

  18. In other news... by Shin+Chan · · Score: 2

    ... This years intergalactic golf competition has started with a complete revamp of the course including a new hole deep into the galaxy! This looks like a promising season to me, so everyone, get your space-clubs out and try not to hit your little ball into that newly formed gas cloud! Oh, and, we appologize 2.2 billion year delay of "this" years golf magazine from outer space.

    --
    Proud owner of BOT2K3 [ bot2k3.net ]
  19. Re:Detected how? by SirTalon42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Poor wording. It didn't come from inside the event horizon, but probably right outside it, or before an event horizon was created it was emitted.

    IANAP; though, I do have a strong intrest in it.

  20. Those impetuous scientists! by kclittle · · Score: 5, Funny

    The burst has been named GRB050509b

    I mean, really! How droll, how clever...

    --
    Generally, bash is superior to python in those environments where python is not installed.
    1. Re:Those impetuous scientists! by CodeMonkey4Hire · · Score: 2, Informative

      Gamma Ray Burst 2005 05 09 b

      I would guess that it was the second gamma ray burst (candidate?) detected (since 1200 GMT?). Lot of guessing on my part though.

      --

      Let's go Hurricanes!!! 2006 Stanley Cup Champions!!!
    2. Re:Those impetuous scientists! by uucp2 · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's obviously leetspeek - though GRBOSOSOGB does not make it much more sensible to me.

  21. And from now on... by Foobar+of+Borg · · Score: 2, Funny

    Mama neutron star will be telling the Black Hole how many hours she was in labor for the rest of her life...

  22. Fate of Black Holes. by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Informative

    Found it. Donald Coyne of UCSC gave a talk on the Ultimate Fate of Small Black Holes. Be sure to check the Milagro link on his facutly page.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  23. Terminology, people! by WormholeFiend · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Shouldn't this be more appropriately described as a black hole being ripped, rather than being born?

  24. Suprise Suprise by weavermatic · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So far these have been the least intelligent responses to scientific matter I believe I have ever see on slashdot. If this were anything related to YRO, linux or windows the people would be busting out certifications & degrees in bunches, but the recorded creation of a blackhole, all we get is poorly constructed sexual innuendo. Fantastic.

  25. It's stuff like this by lheal · · Score: 4, Insightful

    that makes makes me glad I'm not an astronomer.

    A Gamma-ray burst lasting less than a second from 2.2 billion light years away, followed by an X-ray afterglow (for a few seconds).

    Probably a black hole.

    Or maybe the civil war on Zebulon III finally escalated to gamma-ray weapons.

    But what funding agency would believe that?

    --
    Raise your children as if you were teaching them to raise your grandchildren, because you are.
  26. God divided by zero by drewzhrodague · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is nothing new, God was just dividing by zero!

    --
    Zhrodague.net - I do projects and stuff too.
  27. ROTSE did that before? by helioquake · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Wait a second...didn't ROTSE detect an optical afterglow first in 1999?

    ROTSE's first detection of optical afterglow /a?

    1. Re:ROTSE did that before? by lgw · · Score: 4, Informative

      There are long and short GRB events. This was the first time an optical afterglow was detected for a short event. The theory was that long and short GRBs were caused by similar events, and we should see an afterglow for both - which, of course, is the evidence that was found.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    2. Re:ROTSE did that before? by lgw · · Score: 2, Informative

      They're both caused primarily by black hole formation, though. Other hypotheses about GRBs have been quite diverse, as you point out. It's a good point that GRBs are probably caused by a variety of events. The X-Ray and optical afterglow is the signature of black hole formation (by one means or another), which had been predicted for the short bursts and confirmed for some of the long bursts.

      As I understand it, the biggest GRB we've seen in our galaxy was not thought to be black hole formation, however, but a collapse of magnetic energy around a neutron star. I don't understand that one myself.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    3. Re:ROTSE did that before? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      The event you mention that happened in our galaxy was not a GRB. It was a soft gamma ray repeater, which is completely different. If you look at the light curves, a GRB tends to be 'spikey' or a smooth hump, or something in between. Whereas a soft gamma ray repeater has an oscillatory spectrum - there is a spike followed by lots of reverberation. The other big difference between the two classes of events is that soft gamma ray repeaters repeat; Every ten years or so a given object will have an event. GRB's are totally different - they go off, and then are never heard from again.

      Astrophysicists think that soft gamma ray repeaters are due to the decay of extremely strong magnetic fields (strong enough to almost cause vacuum breakdown) in a class of neutron stars called `magnetars`. The reverberation seen matches the period of a pulsar in the error box in at least one case. However, just as we don't know exactly how pulsars pulse, the exact emission mechanism for soft GR repeaters is poorly understood.

  28. sorry about that by voudras · · Score: 3, Funny

    must have been the microwave burritos

  29. Re:LA-LA-LA-LA I CAN'T HEAR YOU by Detritus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I wouldn't give the so-called rational scientists too much credit either. They "knew" that the cosmos was perfect and unchanging, in spite of evidence to the contrary. All human beings have prejudices and irrational ideas.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  30. Re:LA-LA-LA-LA I CAN'T HEAR YOU by sulli · · Score: 4, Funny
    I only *wish* there weren't people out there like that. Holy moly.

    God put them on earth to test you.

    Via evolution, of course.

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
  31. Starting to feel like the universe is.. by Alzheimers · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Great. Now it really is starting to feel like the universe is just one big version of Conway's Game of Life?

  32. And remember what they say... by Chriscypher · · Score: 3, Funny
    Whenever a black hole is born
    a sith lord gets his wings
    --
    "You have liberated me from thought."
  33. Re:I've Wondered... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Why is it that in the last 50 years or so seemingly 90% of people who don't understand jack shit about the world think they know better than the people who do?


    It has all the earmarks of "We don't understand this sh*t, so we think no one else does, so we think god did it". And the rest of the illiterate rabble thinks the same and says "Well that SOUNDS right, let's be skeptical about the very science that lets us use computers in the first place!"

  34. Re:Detected how? by Detritus · · Score: 4, Informative
    I believe you are describing Hawking radiation.

    From what I've read, you have a better chance of detecting a black hole by looking for the effects of its gravitational field on light that passes nearby. It should warp the apparent positions of stars.

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  35. Re:...But they don't exist! by drxray · · Score: 3, Informative

    You're probably joking, but you got modded informative so:

    From your link "according to a physicist"... There is a general consensus that black holes with singularities exist, but the universe doesn't give a damn about our consensual opinion - the Earth would be flat otherwise.

    This is how science works, people come up with testable ideas which are proven right or wrong. No-one is arguing that super-dense, intrinsically dark objects don't exist, we have plenty of evidence that they do. Infinitely dense singularities, well, maybe not - if they exist as we predict they're inside an event horizon and therefore unobservable so actually directly verifying their existance is always going to be impossible... all we can do is come up with odd ideas like dark energy stars which might bounce matter out and see if we can observe that happening.

    --
    Slashdot - Mutual Assured Discussion
  36. Re:LA-LA-LA-LA I CAN'T HEAR YOU by revscat · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They "knew" that the cosmos was perfect and unchanging, in spite of evidence to the contrary.

    The main difference being, of course, was once the evidence became irrefutable that such notions were incorrect, scientists changed the theories to fit the data. Religions have a tendency to kill people when challenged.

  37. Re:Detected how? by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 3, Informative

    Black holes are detectable. The accretion disk about the even horizon emits a lot of gamma rays, because matter falling into the hole are accelerated like crazy. Once matter has reach the even horizon of course, nothing escapes.

    Think of it as a last cry of atoms being swallowed.

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
  38. farsighted by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Human sense augmentation has come quite a long way when we can identify a millisecond event in a gigayear process within a gigaparsec radius. But we can't find Osama, or my car keys.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:farsighted by Daetrin · · Score: 2, Funny
      Human sense augmentation has come quite a long way when we can identify a millisecond event in a gigayear process within a gigaparsec radius. But we can't find Osama, or my car keys.

      I realize you're being droll, but it's obviously a signal to noise ratio issue. The gamma ray burst was a friggin huge signal against a (comparitively) quiet background. If Osama or your car keys were the loudest thing on the planet by an order of magnitude we'd have no trouble finding him/it. Alternatly if the US army started removing noise by killing every living creature they came across eventualy they'd be able to single out Osama's signal.

      ...er, on second thought, perhaps i should have kept that idea to myself.

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
  39. Re:How bright was the burst? by Detritus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't know if you can estimate the actual brightness of the object. If it is like the longer duration bursters, it produces two jets of radiation along an axis through the center of the object. How close are we to the center of that axis?

    --
    Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  40. Gravity waves! by neonleonb · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Hopefully, a sensor was able to catch some gravity waves from this. This is the sort of event that should produce large, measurable gravity waves, so we may finally have evidence of their existence. I certainly hope so.

    1. Re:Gravity waves! by Rauser · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Amen brutha--I was hoping that there would be discussion about this, but I'm sad to see it so low down the page. Apparently we're all comedians on Slashdot today (no, I'm not new here).

      Hopefully the physicists haven't been completely driven away yet. A gravity wave detection coincident with the gamma ray burst and visible light aftermath would be a great event for these folks.

      --
      The white zone is for loading and unloading only. If you need to load or unload go to the white zone. It's a way of life
    2. Re:Gravity waves! by cmsavage · · Score: 3, Informative

      From an event such as this 2.2 billion light years away, the gravity waves would be negligibly small. The LIGO detector will not be sensitive enough to detect merging neutron stars farther away than the local galaxy cluster (10 million light years in diameter).

  41. yes, then new evidence changes minds by bobalu · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That's the way it's supposed to work. "They" didn't ALL believe that obviously, and when there was enough evidence to the contrary the theory was updated.

    Scientists can be just as guilty as anyone of holding onto their beliefs, the difference is they can't say "God told me so" and justify killing the nonbelievers.

    --
    The revolution will NOT be televised.
  42. Chuck Jones syndrome by KC7GR · · Score: 2, Funny

    I must have Looney Tunes on the brain this morning, because my gray matter parsed this...

    "...thanks to an automated email system that notifies astronomers worldwide..."

    As this:

    "...thanks to an automated anvil system that notifies astronomers worldwide."

    I had this bizarre image of all different types and sizes of anvils, all with messages about the GRB attached, dropping onto (and through) desks and computers of astronomers all over the place while, in the background, Marvin the Martian is cackling about it in that lovably maniacal way that only Mel Blanc could give him.

    Essence, I wish Chuck Jones was still around to exploit this one... ;-)

    --

    Bruce Lane, KC7GR,

    Blue Feather Technologies

  43. Re:Detected how? by Hatta · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Every other post seems to be a joke, so I'll just put this here. What's with the artist's rendition? The article said the event was photographed, why not use that image instead of some swirly colors that may or may not have any relation to reality?

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  44. Merger between two neutron stars? by Eminence · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The GRB signals the birth of a black hole resulting from a merger between two neutron stars.

    Is that the current scientific consensus? Because I've just yesterday read about a whole different theory behind GRBs, namely that they signal a collapse of a super-massive star inside star nurseries at the edges of the observable Universe.

  45. Obligatory statement by eremitic · · Score: 2, Funny

    And so a star was born.

    Er...wait...nevermind.

    --
    Warning: Could be fatal if taken seriously
  46. Drake's equation by Morgaine · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So far these have been the least intelligent responses to scientific matter I believe I have ever see on slashdot.

    Yeah, kind of dire. :-) But then, it's Slashdot, and it does have its moments.

    Here's a slightly scientific thought for you though (but only slightly). What's the extinction radius of a 10,000 trillion trillion trillion watt event like this one?

    Because if the extinction radius is at all large, and if this happens at all frequently on a cosmological timescale, then it ought to be factored into Drake's equation.

    It could be the reason why the galaxy doesn't appear to be crammed full of high-tech intelligent life --- maybe random sectors of the galaxy everywhere get sterilized back to lifelessness by magnetar events often enough to keep the average density of life in the galaxy near zero, because life simply can't persist very long?

    --
    "The question of whether machines can think is no more interesting than [] whether submarines can swim" - Dijkstra
    1. Re:Drake's equation by haggar · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Did you take into consideration that Gamma-ray bursts are directed (beamed) and not spherically dispersed? I think talking of an extinction radius is wrong for this and other reasons. You could be on a planet reasonably close to a black hole formation without any risk of estinction, because you are away from the axis of the beam.

      Also, at a distance wherethe Gamma-ray flux is fairly weak, you might find yourself on the opposite side of a planet, and survive.

      In fact, it is not impossible that life as we know it, is not the only one possible. Life may not be based on carbon, or organic matter. The excellent movie "The Andromeda Strain" in fact, describes a lifeform based on non-organic chrystals. Who is to say that such lifeform wouldn't be much more resistent to Gamma rays.

      --
      Sigged!
    2. Re:Drake's equation by LurkerXXX · · Score: 2, Informative
      Yes you would, depending on who he thought his audience was. This is space.com we are talking about. Lots of general public types look at it.

      Extremely experienced scientists dumb down their talks all the time for lay people. When I give a talk to my colleagues, I use entirely different language and skip over very basic stuff that I definitely do go over when I talk to the general public.

  47. Obligatory Red Dwarf quote by grolschie · · Score: 2, Funny

    Holly: As it transpired, there weren't any Black Holes.
    Rimmer: But you saw them - you saw them on the monitor.
    Holly: They weren't Black Holes.
    Rimmer: What were they?
    Holly: Grit. Five specks of grit on the scanner-scope. See, the thing about grit is, it's black, and the thing about scanner-scopes...
    Rimmer: Oh, shut up.

  48. Re:Detected how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Real image: (Note it is a negative - black means lots of light. The big thing in the middle is a galaxy, and the error box is pointing to somewhere on its outer edge.)
    http://www.srl.caltech.edu/~cenko/grb050509b/05050 9.jpg

  49. what they detected... by cahiha · · Score: 4, Informative

    What they detected was a gamma ray burst and an afterglow. Everything else is speculation; they are basically saying "if all our theories are correct, then the explanation that this is two neutron stars merging into a black hole is the most plausible explanation". The observation does not provide any additional evidence that black holes exist.

  50. Layers of interdependency in science by quokkapox · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Human sense augmentation has come quite a long way when we can identify a millisecond event in a gigayear process within a gigaparsec radius.

    Not just identify and detect, but predict. This is just another nail in the coffin of Intelligent Design "theory" and similar nonscientific drivel. This whole science business we modern humans have been working on, and all the theories that are widely accepted today, are all interconnected, with layers upon layers of interdependency, which provides a sort of check-and-balance on the whole mess. One cannot accept that modern scientific theory predicted this black-hole event, which observers around the world could see and record with (technologically augmented) senses, while completely denying the validity of interdependent theories like electromagentism, gravity, relativity, quantum physics, etc. It's important to make this clear to those who would pick and choose which theories they happen to like or which support their own offbeat schemes for how the world works. It's all connected, and you can either take it all (with a grain of salt and a good measure of critical rationalism, of course, because nothing is beyond all doubt and one should always be open to new evidence that contradicts an accepted theory) or chuck it all and go read your horoscope.

    --
    it's a blue bright blue Saturday hey hey
  51. Re:LA-LA-LA-LA I CAN'T HEAR YOU by revscat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Where do you think the word "Protestant" came from?

    And how many people died as a direct result of the Protestant reformation? Compare, please, to the number of people who died as a part of the revolution in physics at the advent of quantum mechanics and general relativity.