Slashdot Mirror


Low-Cost Space Shuttle Replacement Proposed

FleaPlus writes "The Washington Times and Space.com has an article on a plan for a low-cost shuttle replacement by t/Space, an organization whose team includes AirLaunch LLC and Burt Rutan's Scaled Composites. Instead of a one-size-fits-all craft, t/Space's plan is to build an air-launched four-person capsule termed the Crew Transfer Vehicle (CXV), specialized for carrying people to and from low-Earth orbit. Once in orbit the CXV would dock with a separately-launched Crew Exploration Vehicle (likely built by Lockheed Martin or Northrop Grumman), which could be optimized for traveling between Earth orbit and the Moon. The CXV would also be able to dock with a space station or serve as a crew lifeboat. The group, which has already received some NASA funding, calculates that it can have the system ready by 2008 for $400 million, with a per-launch cost of $20 million (compared to ~$500 million per shuttle launch). Development would be done under a competitive fixed-price (instead of cost-plus) contract."

17 of 283 comments (clear)

  1. Shuttle Mod Editor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I propose that Mr. Carmack Open Sources the plans to his giant bottle rocket and lets the end user create a deep space mod for it.

    1. Re:Shuttle Mod Editor by wootest · · Score: 2, Funny

      Me, I just want an iPod shuttle.

    2. Re:Shuttle Mod Editor by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 2, Funny

      Carmack's space ship designs suffer from a slight problem.

      He keeps building the Nav controls and the window too far apart, you can either fly the ship, or see where your going, but not at the same time ;)

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
  2. home vs travel by mrselfdestrukt · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why not just build an international space station or something... ?

    --
    "I used to have that really cool,funny sig ,but it got stolen."
  3. Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    "The group calculates that it can have the system ready by 2008 for $400 million".

    Alright guys, this means we will have it around 2015 for about $750 million.

  4. The future by promantek · · Score: 5, Funny

    Trinity: what do you need?

    Neo: estes rockets. lots of estes rockets. and big rubber bands.

    Trinity: nobody has ever tried anything like this before.

    Neo: that's why it's going to work.

  5. Re:Cost by Vo0k · · Score: 4, Funny

    If we can get back into space for 400 million, call it a bargain, secretly poison 90% of the military decision makers and GO!
    Otherwise, they will say "Going into space? What a waste of money! That's almost 1/5 of a stealth bomber! No way!"

    --
    Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
  6. Re:Getting There, and Costs by promantek · · Score: 2, Funny

    It only costs $12.74 to launch a ship into space.

    I'm so sick of people who think that space travel isn't affordable to the average person.

  7. Cheap space travel... by The+Jabberwock · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...was mastered long ago by the Chinese official, Wan Hu. He clearly has prior art.

  8. Meh. Time to end rockets by 91degrees · · Score: 2, Funny

    Rockets are bulky and inefficient.

    We need to switch to trebuchets.

  9. Re:Meh. Time to end rockets by StratoChief66 · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is for human launching, buddy. Isn't the earth escape velocity something in the order of 11 km/s? I don't know if this factors in air resistance on the way up but I suppose at that speed you are not in the atmosphere for long. Wouldn't a trebuchet have to give the 'cargo' a velocity in this order to put them in orbit if not to escape earth's gravity?

    I say cargo instead of crew because I think they would be more of a paste if accelerated by a trebuchet to this speed in the small time they would be in contact. Plus I'd like to see how you are planning to store and deliver the energy required to fire the aformentioned human 'cargo'.

    Ignoring these minor difficulties I would love to be present at the event. I wonder what kind of sound the trebuchet would make upon releasing so much tension, would it sound like a standard trebuchet but louder? God, some days I wish I had money and diplomatic immunity.

    --
    Frylock: "We should have cloned twenties, Jackson wouldn't have given a fuck."
  10. Low-Cost by Cow+Jones · · Score: 3, Funny


    I keep reading Lost-Cow Space Shuttle Replacement
    ... must wake up ... need coffee ...

    --

    Ah, arrogance and stupidity, all in the same package. How efficient of you. -- Londo Mollari
  11. Re:Meh. Time to end rockets by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    My thoughts exactly.

    My add-on is multi-stage trebuchets - the first really big trebuchet fires the second trebuchet. When the second trebuchet gets to the peak of its ascent, it fires the third trebuchet...

    You probably want to give the astronauts a couple of pillows in case it gets rough.

  12. Re:Why not? by ceeam · · Score: 3, Funny

    Uhm, I have this wonderful idea here that needs only $20m(!) to complete. I cannot tell you any more details now (so that others don't steal it, you know), but if you send me this much money now, I promise that in the middle of 2008 we'll rule the world. PS: don't tell anything anyone, just send in the money.

  13. Whoa . . . by Selanit · · Score: 3, Funny

    For a moment I read that story title as "Lost Cow Space Shuttle Replacement Proposed." And I was like -- wait, when did we build a cow spaceship? Was it built from cows or for cows? How'd we lose it? Is there now a cow family wandering the vast black reaches of the galaxy looking for a way home, with a cow-robot that keeps saying "Danger, Bessy Cowbinson, Danger!" . . . ? o.O

  14. Subs are already aerodynamic... by Beefslaya · · Score: 1, Funny

    They should turn the retired submarines into space shuttles. Kinda like they are going to turn old military bases into oil refineries.

  15. Spending money on space is a *BAD* idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I read that we are spending $1B USD PER DAY to keep a military presence in Iraq.

    If we start buying this kind of crap, we may have to pull out of Iraq a day early. Then where would we be?