Slashdot Mirror


The Revolution is Coming Mid-2006?

GameIndustry.biz is reporting that the Nintendo Revolution is slated to arrive in Mid-2006. The information comes from a key supplier. From the article: "This is the first solid evidence that the Revolution platform is still on track for a mid-2006 launch. The console is expected to debut at a pre-E3 conference next Tuesday, but it's still not known just how much will be on display - with sources close to Nintendo suggesting that only a pre-recorded video of "next-gen footage" may be shown."

69 comments

  1. UGH by chadamir · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I am the biggest nintendo fanboy that there is, but they consitantly pull this kind of shit. Before it was ultra 64 it was called Project Reality and it promised graphics similar to what gamecube has now. It then became Ultra 64 and was delayed and only footage was shown(example being Final Fantasy 64) and then eventually they released Nintendo 64. I really hope the big N doesnt do this again. Whenever I hear that stuff wont be playable I cant help but smell delay.

    1. Re:UGH by MilenCent · · Score: 1

      What are you talking about? "Constantly" here means, basically, "The N64." Revolution hasn't even been pushed back, this is our first hint as to its release date.

      You may be smelling delay, but wait until the delay actually comes before complaining. Then I'll probably chime in, heh.

    2. Re:UGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pull what kind of shit? Not jump the gun on the next generation of consoles, unlike Sony and MS?

    3. Re:UGH by chadamir · · Score: 1

      Nintendo 64 was a whopping failure. The dev kits were a mess. Nintendo is just very good at hyping things that while innovative dont end up being successful for some reason or another. I'm not trying to put them down, I just worry about them.

    4. Re:UGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Project Reality was just a codename, just like Dolphin was for the Gamecube. How did you get the idea that it was a bad thing to pick a different name from that to actually sell the console under? I don't remember there being any promises that it would feature graphics similar to the Gamecube's, either.

    5. Re:UGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      failure?

      didn't the N64 sell more consoles than the Super NES?

    6. Re:UGH by falcon5768 · · Score: 1

      maybe, but by this time Sony had swamped both them and Sega with the Playstation, maybe not as BIG as failure as Dreamcast was, but it was still a dissapointment.

      --

      "Slashdot, where telling the truth is overrated but lying is insightful."

    7. Re:UGH by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      " Before it was ultra 64 it was called Project Reality and it promised graphics similar to what gamecube has now."

      No they didn't. I don't know what your expectations were, but they were awfully high even with Nintendo's hype.

      "I really hope the big N doesnt do this again."

      The GameCube launched on time.

      "Whenever I hear that stuff wont be playable I cant help but smell delay."

      It's too early, man. If it's going to launch in 06 (which has NOT been announced), then being playable this E3 isn't the deciding factor. If it were supposed to launch this fall, I'd agree with you.

      SpaceWorld will be in 2-3 months. If Revolution isn't playable then, THEN you've got something to worry about.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    8. Re:UGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are misremembering history.

      N64 and PS were strong competition for each other until FF7. It was only then that PS pulled ahead - when all the N64 owners bought PS systems in addition to their N64.

      N64 did the same thing earlier with Super Mario 64. A lot of PS owners gobbled up N64s for that title, and were glad that they had when the Zeldas, MK64, Super Smash Bros., and F-Zero X came along (not in that order).

      And yes, to confirm, the N64 outsold the SNES. N64 was a big success, and was profitable throughout its lifespan on the strength of its first-party exclusives. It was only a disappointment compared to SNES in the sense that PS did so damn well in growing the games market, better than the N64.

    9. Re:UGH by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      "Nintendo 64 was a whopping failure."

      Yeah, they only sold 30 million N64s sold a few million copies of Mario 64 and Ocarina of Time. I can't believe they still have billions in the bank.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    10. Re:UGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Before it was ultra 64 it was called Project Reality and it promised graphics similar to what gamecube has now."

      No, it promised graphics equivalent to a low-end SGI workstation of the day (which is far below even Dreamcast specs). It more or less delivered on this promise, considering that its CPU and graphics subsystem were co-designed with SGI in the early 90s.

      "It then became Ultra 64 and was delayed and only footage was shown(example being Final Fantasy 64) and then eventually they released Nintendo 64."

      That wasn't FF64, that was a Square tech demo based on characters and music from FF6 that ran on SGI hardware. You controlled it with a mouse.

      The fact that you and I know anything about this tech demo is Square's fault, not Nintendo's.

    11. Re:UGH by DeadScreenSky · · Score: 1

      The arcade version of Killer Instinct (and to a lesser extent Crusing USA) was not possible to do on the N64 but the arcade game itself actually stated that it would. Maybe you could argue it wasn't Gamecube-level graphics but its inarguable that it was more than the N64 was capable of accomplishing.

      --
      There is no excellent beauty that hath not some strangeness in the proportion. -- Francis Bacon
    12. Re:UGH by djdanlib · · Score: 1

      I dunno, I really liked a few of the games that went gold and re-released:

      Mario 64
      Zelda: Ocarina of Time
      Mario Kart 64
      Mario Party

      I'd buy the system just to play one of those games. To me, it was not a whopping failure.

  2. I see a problem by Joe+the+Lesser · · Score: 4, Funny

    I was to understand that the revolution wouldn't be televised, so how the heck can you see the game you're playing???

    --
    "I only speak the truth"
    Karma: null(Mostly affected by an unassigned variable)
    1. Re:I see a problem by dimator · · Score: 1

      Sweet christ, will there be a "televised" comment whenever there is any story about the next Nintendo console?

      --
      python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
    2. Re:I see a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Holograms... you mean you haven't heard?

    3. Re:I see a problem by Lynxara · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yes. Remember, Slashdot is where old jokes go to die.

    4. Re:I see a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What I was wondering is, who's going to be first up against the wall when the Revolution comes?

      (Considering there's no marketing department of the Sirius Cybernetics Corporation yet...)

    5. Re:I see a problem by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Is there a Sony Cybernetics Corporation yet?

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    6. Re:I see a problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aibo? :)

    7. Re:I see a problem by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Yeah but I'm not sure they have a subcompany for that.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  3. Rumors by cainpitt · · Score: 1

    Granted that I didn't read the article but it seems like slashdot and the Internet in general is full of these rumors. If I see an announcement about the release or specs for the PS3 today, I'm leaving.

  4. saw this on /. once by ike6116 · · Score: 0, Troll

    "the revolution will be moderated up." waa waaaa

    --

    Are you secure enough in your masculinity to run 'man touch'?
  5. Interesting that... by game+kid · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    ...we're using a quote from PS2's GTA: San Andreas' Ammu-Nation guy* to announce this. (Minus the Mid-2006 part of course.)

    *yes I know they most likely got it from someone else, sue/blow me.

    --
    You can hold down the "B" button for continuous firing.
  6. a few things: by muel · · Score: 3, Insightful

    1) the day Nintendo matches the schedule of their hardware supplier for a release date will be a cold day in hell. Not to say that this isn't necessarily true, but this estimate has to be based on the timeframe Nintendo has issued for the RAM. Who's to say that such a date isn't only for Japan, or only for the USA, or perhaps an extra-early due date for MoSys to make sure they get their goods ready in time for the REAL Revolution release date? not the best timeframe to rely on.

    2) recent reports have pointed at an "earlier" release date for the PS3 as well; is this to say that XBox 360 is actually forcing the hands of Sony and Nintendo? years ago, nobody would've ever predicted that, but perhaps people are finally beginning to fear MS's momentum in the console industry. now THAT is the point of this article. very interesting and exciting to see MS keeping everyone on their toes.

    1. Re:a few things: by frikazoyd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You know, it is very interesting. I remember reading interviews with Iwata, stating that Nintendo intended to release their next console before the end of 2005, with the intent of beating the other console makers out of the gate. Now, we see Microsoft about to release their console just in time for the post-Turkey shopping craze, and Sony and Nintendo in the background spinning their gears like crazy?

      Bottom line, I think that the Japanese video game contenders got the wind knocked out of them by focusing on a pre-sprint portable frenzy, and it gave Microsoft the time to catch the other companies with their pants down. Now all that remains to be revealed is the starting lineup of games each console will offer. Will E3's promises of some amzing Nintendo or Sony game delay sales of the X-Box? It will be an interesting year, I'll tell you that.

    2. Re:a few things: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It could still be an interesting christmas season ...

      Quite possibly, both Nintendo and Sony will use both their Portable systems as well as their consoles to lower the ammount of money people have to buy an XBox360. I wouldn't be that surprised to see a price drop in the PSP, DS, PS2; I expect Nintendo to have an amazing pack in deal with new Gamecubes; Nintedo will release Zelda and Fire Emblem; and (as always) Sony will have a fantastic holiday line-up for the PS2. If I hated gaming companies working their asses off to get me to spend my money I'd be furious.

    3. Re:a few things: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Bottom line, I think that the Japanese video game contenders got the wind knocked out of them by focusing on a pre-sprint portable frenzy, and it gave Microsoft the time to catch the other companies with their pants down. Now all that remains to be revealed is the starting lineup of games each console will offer. Will E3's promises of some amzing Nintendo or Sony game delay sales of the X-Box? It will be an interesting year, I'll tell you that."

      Bottom line, you're just a dumb little fanboy.

      Honestly where the fuck do you clowns come up with this crap? It hurts my head just reading such inane crap.

      Go back to teamxbox clown. Where everybody believes the crap you posted.

    4. Re:a few things: by SetupWeasel · · Score: 1

      I only remember Iwata saying that they would launch with the PS3 or beat it to market. Every story I've read suggests Nintendo thinks Microsoft is rushing their next console to market too early.

    5. Re:a few things: by eyeye · · Score: 1

      I would have thought that microsofts competitors would wait and see the specs of the xbox 360 and immediately announce better specs to try to put people off buying an expensive and possibly obsolete console.

      --
      Bush and Blair ate my sig!
    6. Re:a few things: by frikazoyd · · Score: 1

      Well, you got one out of three. Not bad. I'm neither dumb nor a boy, but I am a fan. Oh, but not of the X-Box. I don't even own one of those. Shockingly, I run Linux (when I am not playing Half Life 2), and I own every Nintendo console.

      Try reading my post before flying off the handle. How does a split of resources leading to a slowdown of production hurt your head? I mean really, is it so impossible to believe that one team split between developing for two consoles might be a bit slower out of the gate than another team who is just focusing on one competing console? Want me to draw a picture?

    7. Re:a few things: by kabocox · · Score: 1

      I only remember Iwata saying that they would launch with the PS3 or beat it to market. Every story I've read suggests Nintendo thinks Microsoft is rushing their next console to market too
      early.


      If the next Xbox isn't backwards compatible, it may be dead in the water shortly after PS3 and the Revolution launch. I bought a PS2 mainly for the ability to play all those FF games that came out on for the PS1. I'll be getting a Revolution mainly to play all those Gamecube games that I haven't played yet. I'd think that Gamecube customers may buy P3s just so they can also play that large selection of titles.

    8. Re:a few things: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Backwards compatibility is the least of the xbox's problems:

      1) The weak hardware
      2) The buttugly industrial design
      3) The lack of any new exclusive IPs worth mentioning

      MS will be lucky to keep even half of their current installed base.

    9. Re:a few things: by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Sony will probably announce larger specs on their pre-E3 thing. Nintendo won't try a specwar, that would be inconsistent with all of their "specs don't matter" talk.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  7. Nintendo just realizes the truth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Nintendo probably is just recognizing the reality of the situation; that is, because of their smaller market share outside of Japan, their impact in the media covering E3 will be much smaller than either the PS3 or XBox360. What they're possibly trying to do by showing "in game" footage is to stop rumors on poor graphical performance (and possibly demonstrate a more "friendly" potential launch line-up).

    Let's face it, being that Half-Life 2 was beautiful on pretty average hardware (that is on medium settings it still kicked ass) all three upcomming consoles will have impressive graphics.

    Now Nintendo may have realized that launching a system with Super Monkey Ball and Rogue Leader to apeal to the masses may not have been such a great idea. I personally suspect that Nintendo's movies will demonstrate a new Super Mario game, and a handful of "mature" games that will all "launch with the system".

    It would be nice if they were playable, but the main question is "Does it matter how a game plays 12-18 months before it is released?".

    1. Re:Nintendo just realizes the truth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Nintendo probably is just recognizing the reality of the situation; that is, because of their smaller market share outside of Japan, their impact in the media covering E3 will be much smaller than either the PS3 or XBox360."

      Nintendo's booth at E3 this year is bigger than Sony's. They are not going to cede media coverage to Sony or anyone, not while the Reggielution is in effect.

      Don't forget last year's Nintendo pre-show event, and how nothing was expected from Nintendo's camp except maybe a few DS tidbits. We all know how well the real show went over, compared to the same-old Powerpoint-fests that the competition had going on. Nintendo is still riding high on the PR streak they created for themselves last year; I wouldn't expect that they will try to change this.

    2. Re:Nintendo just realizes the truth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't dispute that Nintendo will have a big show, but I doubt that the Revoultion could have the impact at this show that Nintendo would want it to.

      Let's face it, even without considering any other company, the revolution has a lot of competition for people's attention; Nintendo has to continue to show of content for the DS, GBA, and Gamecube. If Nintendo releases too much information about the Revolution they could be in a situation where everyone will pay too much attention to (or too little attention to) the Revolution and not enough attention to everything else that Nintendo has.

  8. Launch by mrbaggs · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Anyone who thinks big N or even Sony for that matter would release a major system before the holiday shopping season is a fool. It'll be 4Q 2006 at earliest.

    1. Re:Launch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It depends on whether you're talking about a Japaneese or North American launch date. I believe that both the PS2 and Gamecube were released in either June or July.

      Even in North America it could be released in late August or early September; after all the Dreamcast was launched on 9/9/99 ...

    2. Re:Launch by mrbaggs · · Score: 1

      Yeah, that falls under 4Q. Sept-Dec. I could care less about Japan's release date.

    3. Re:Launch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Yeah, that falls under 4Q. Sept-Dec. I could care less about Japan's release date."

      How much less could you care about Japan's release date? Be specific.

      Me, I could care a lot less (maybe by 95%), since I intend to import a Revolution from Japan if there's any chance of a Mario game being a launch title.

    4. Re:Launch by FLAGGR · · Score: 1

      I'd consider PSP a major system from Sony, yet it didn't come out Q4

    5. Re:Launch by dtfarmer · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, that falls under 4Q. Sept-Dec.

      <post topic="don't know" mode=pedantic+sarcastic+offtopic>

      Uh, thanks for the reminder, I keep forgetting that the last quarter is the 4-month long one. Now which quarter is the short 2-month long one, again?

      </post>

    6. Re:Launch by mrbaggs · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah... well.... Damn, I got nothin. He burned me.

    7. Re:Launch by The-Bus · · Score: 1

      Well, if they can launch it early, they will launch it early. It's simply stupid for them to wait around before releasing the console if it's truly ready. They can test out their supply chains, and if a console is released in September, shortages in October won't be as bad as shortages in November and December. Nintendo also has a history (SNES, N64) of releasing systems not right before Christmas. That's the smart play anyway. Release something in the summer, by the holiday you will have at least a few good games out.

      --

      Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

    8. Re:Launch by tuxedobob · · Score: 1

      You know, Sept 16 - Dec 15 would be a 3-month period...

  9. Turning In To A Two Horse Race by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With the dud the Xbox 360 has turned out to be it's looking like it is back to a two horse race this next console cycle.

    The weak xbox 360 hardware is going to make it tough for companies who try to port their PS3 games down to the way slower xbox hardware.

    In essence MS will be exiting the console market and moving to take over the home computer market. You just have to look at the list of developers supporting the 360, trimming out all the one who are only considering dumping PS3 ports to it, you are basically left with all pc developers.

    Revolution is really exciting console developers after a long period of silence from Nintendo. It will be nice to be back to a Sony and Nintendo contest with MS out of the picture. Everyone in the console dev world loves Sony and Nintendo to some degree, and pretty much despised MS and the people who work there. Dimwitted pricks seems to be the consensus of the people I work with.

    1. Re:Turning In To A Two Horse Race by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "The weak xbox 360 hardware is going to make it tough for companies who try to port their PS3 games down to the way slower xbox hardware"

      Anyone who would say that any of the 3 upcomming hardware systems is "weak" is obviously an idiot ...

      Resident Evil 4 looked great on the Gamecube and all new hardware will blow that away.

    2. Re:Turning In To A Two Horse Race by frikazoyd · · Score: 2

      First of all, I'm wondering what X-Box 360 specs you were looking at. Secondly, we don't really have concrete, announced specs on any of the three consoles, so your argument has no real base. Third, do you honestly think that the most powerful console of this generation isn't going to have a loyal following at least as large as the current one? Do you not think that the thirst the PC gamer has for console games catered to their taste is going to last for a second console?

      I may not like the X-Box myself, but I recognize that PC gamers like their X-Box games here in America, and that the X-Box caters to a very large niche. I don't think Microsoft is going to be dumb enough to sacrifice any sort of power, or risk the image they have worked so hard to garner. You're living in a dream world, and as sad as I am to say it, I'm truly afraid that Nintendo can either do incredibly well, or incredibly bad with their new "innovation". People know the difference between a gimmick and a truly revolutionary enhancement. And, Nintendo is very capable of both. I just hope they don't put all their betting money on a gimmicky horse that looks strong in the stables.

    3. Re:Turning In To A Two Horse Race by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you can tell me who will win the next console war, then surely you can tell me what I'm getting for my next birthday.

    4. Re:Turning In To A Two Horse Race by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're just proving how much of an idiot you really are ...

      How much of a visual difference do you suppose that the "extra" power that the PS3 or Revolution will provide? Certainly the PS3 or Revolution will have aproximately 2X the power of the XBox360 but does it really matter?

      The reality is that the "power" difference in the next generation will be smaller that the power difference in the current generation. Also remember that when a multiplatform game is developed it is designed around the specifications of the weakest of the systems that is popular enough.

      To a certain extent your argument sounds like the idiots who claimed that the "PS2 would provide graphics at a level far above the Dreamcast"; the truth is that, although the PS2 was more powerful, there wasn't a game produced for the PS2 that couldn't be ported successfully to the dreamcast.

    5. Re:Turning In To A Two Horse Race by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If you can tell me who will win the next console war, then surely you can tell me what I'm getting for my next birthday."

      If you work in the console biz the first one is easy, the second one is impossible.

      Console wars are won and lost long before consumers get their hands on the actual hardware. Knowing who is going to be the dominant platform just isn't that big of a deal.

      It is amusing to watch the furious and pointless fanboy debates though.

    6. Re:Turning In To A Two Horse Race by FLAGGR · · Score: 1

      You know whats funnier? "Informed" AC's.

    7. Re:Turning In To A Two Horse Race by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Xbox 360 is in the same position the PS2 was in. And we all know what a flop that turned out to be.

      Look, unless you are either a psychic, jedi, or just stepping out of your delorean, you can't say a damn thing about what is going to happen next generation, no matter what "biz" you work in. You can make predictions, but you can't say what is going to happen.

      Oh, and just to clarify, I think the current Xbox is a sack of shit with a green dot on it.

    8. Re:Turning In To A Two Horse Race by snuf23 · · Score: 1

      Xbox is my favorite current generation console for playing Nintendo games on. It handles NES, SNES, GB, GBA and N64 games much better than the PS2 or Gamecube.

      --
      Sometimes my arms bend back.
    9. Re:Turning In To A Two Horse Race by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have fun rooting for your favorite over the next six to twelve months. Have fun with the idiotic 'launch strategy' debates you fanboys never get tired of talking about

      For those of us with multi-million dollar game budgets getting ready for the next console cycle you better fucking believe we have a good idea of who is going to be the prime target for all that money. If you can't figure out something as basic as that you aren't going to be in this business for very long.

      It was a no-brainer the Dreamcast was dead on arrival. It was a no-brainer that MS would waste billions just to stay alive in the market. Just like it is a no-brainer that the PS3 will dominate the upcoming cycle. You don't even need any secret inside info to see the massive developer support for the PS3.

      Maybe a meteor will strike Sony's headquarters or manufacturing plants. Maybe a massive earthquake take out Sony's buildings. Outside of something like that, the contracts have been signed. The ink is dry. The projects have been green-lighted. Just like they were the last cycle.

      All the while the fanboys continue their pointless debates...

    10. Re:Turning In To A Two Horse Race by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm rooting for Nintendo, but I would predict that they will be outsold. Any system may sucseed next generation, and until that time, nobody knows for sure which one it will be.
      And, until that time, pull your head out of your ass, ass.

    11. Re:Turning In To A Two Horse Race by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't give a shit who the fuck you're 'rooting for'

      Go back to paying for and playing the stuff we make. Leave the thinking to us smart folk.

    12. Re:Turning In To A Two Horse Race by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "EAT SHIT, MOTHERFUCKER!"

      -George Carlin

      Gayness filter encountered. Child aborted!
      Reason: Don't use so many assplugs. It's like BLEEDING FROM THE COLON.

    13. Re:Turning In To A Two Horse Race by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...
      And the number one way to tell someone is a 14 year old on a web forum is ...

      They claim to be a game developer for a large development company.

      Seriously, millions of people who bought a PS2 and didn't purchace a Gamecube nor an XBox did so not because the PS2 had "Awsome Power" (to quote the mr. sparkle comercial) but because the PS2 had the games that they wanted to play. If hardware capabilities mattered so much the Gameboy would have been the biggest comercial flop ever; some how the gameboy outsold the GameGear, WonderSwan, Neo-Geo pocket, Game.com, etc. with far inferior hardware.

    14. Re:Turning In To A Two Horse Race by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The xbox is popular same reason as the Dreamcast was: Easy to pirate software.

    15. Re:Turning In To A Two Horse Race by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow an AC who thinks he's some fucking genious game developer with all the answers. Gee, Mr. Carmack any other insights? Perhaps you could give me some pointers how to be a black belt, fix a car, and be the best Counter Strike player next to you.

      "All the while the fanboys continue their pointless debates..."

      Yeah, keep sucking that Sony dick.

      The PS sucked, the PS2 sucked. The graphics are *ASS*.

      I see no reason why the PS3 won't suck.

    16. Re:Turning In To A Two Horse Race by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ahahaha...

      "Loud-mouthed American 'industry representative' assumes that somehow I must be buying his shit. It is reported that he thinks this way about everyone. News at 11."

  10. WOW by kryogen1x · · Score: 1
    From TFA:

    According to the site, the console will boast four 2.5Ghz IBM G5 Custom cores, with 128KB of level 1 cache and a 512KB shared level 2 cache, while the graphics will be powered by a dual core ATI RN520 chipset, with 16MB of on-board eDRAM for the frame buffer.

    10 GHZ? IIRC, that beats out XBOX 360.

    1. Re:WOW by Mattintosh · · Score: 1

      Jeez... I guess you'll need some gloves for it then. The "Revolution" is a handheld system.

      Dev kits are already out there. Last I'd heard, "Revolution" was going to be released either just before Christmas, or in mid-spring.

      Nintendo's next home system won't be out for quite a while, probably not until early 2007. I hope UT2k7 is a launch title for it... what with the PPU and all... I've probably said too much...

    2. Re:WOW by Jarlsberg · · Score: 1
      Four 2,5GHz cores doesn't make it 10GHz ;)

      128KB of level 1 cache and a 512KB shared level 2 cache
      Seems underpowered to me, but then, it's a console not a computer.
    3. Re:WOW by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Those specs were a blatant lie and the one who made them up admitted they were false five minutes later. Idiots spread them nonetheless.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.