Slashdot Mirror


Massachusetts Drops Hammer on Spam Gang

karvind writes "According to story on BBC and Yahoo, the Massachusetts attorney general has filed a lawsuit against one of the world's biggest spam gangs. An emergency court order granted under the suit should see the network of websites the spammers ran shut down. Attorney General Thomas Reilly's civil complaint against alleged ringleader Leo Kuvayev and six other people associated with 2K Services Ltd. and Ecash Pay Ltd. Offered for sale on the websites were pornography, pills, pirated software and fake fancy watches."

212 comments

  1. So who will win the PR war by peragrin · · Score: 5, Funny

    New York's Attoreny General

    or

    Massachusetts attorney general?

    Both are making huge names for themselves by fighting the fights no one else wants to touch.

    --
    i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    1. Re:So who will win the PR war by vandon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This really isn't going to do anything. Spam sites get shut down all the time and spammers have other servers lined up to move to at a moments notice. They're probably back up and operating at a new site already.

    2. Re:So who will win the PR war by suwain_2 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I don't know about in New York, but it's been speculated that Reilly's going to run for governor of Massachusetts in the next election.

      Something like this might look really good in a campaign.

      --
      ________________________________________________
      suwain_2 :: quality slashdot p
    3. Re:So who will win the PR war by rootbeertapper · · Score: 1

      Well, Thomas Reilly, the AG of Massachusetts is set to run for Governor in 2006 so this is probably not much more then a PR move for his campaign

    4. Re:So who will win the PR war by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They're probably back up and operating at a new site already.

      Yes, but with this precedent, expect the sites to be shutdown just as fast as warez sites.

    5. Re:So who will win the PR war by peragrin · · Score: 1

      Spitzer is also (NY) is also contemplating a governer.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    6. Re:So who will win the PR war by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're probably back up and operating at a new site already.

      Nice.. so you're saying that they want to add contempt of court to the list of charges against them?

    7. Re:So who will win the PR war by vandon · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, but with this precedent, expect the sites to be shutdown just as fast as warez sites.

      Not that *I* use those those types of sites, but I know of a few sites that have been up and running for quite a while.

    8. Re:So who will win the PR war by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Use "then" as an adverb, noun or adjective to reference time or something that follows in time. The word you meant to you was "than" which is a conjunction between phrases being compared.

      Examples:
      John's computer has more RAM than Gina's.
      OK, then I'll use John's computer.
      First put the CD in then hold the C key to boot from the CD.
      Booting from a CD is faster than booting to a floppy.

    9. Re:So who will win the PR war by frankie · · Score: 2, Informative

      No speculation in New York, it's a done deal

      http://www.spitzer2006.com/

    10. Re:So who will win the PR war by itchy92 · · Score: 1

      Get a fucking life, man. Do you behave this condescendingly in all aspects of your life? Do you interrupt people to correct their enunciation? Does it somehow fulfill your sense of self-worth?

      This goes out to all the pedants out there: grow the fuck up. My personal apologies that we don't all speak the Queen's english, and that obviously makes it too difficult for you to apply your deductive reasoning skills to understand the idea we were trying to convey.And there's a good chance I've swallowed the proverbial hook, line, and sinker on a troll, but it really gets old.

      --
      Slashdot: News for nerds. Stuff tha-- MICRO$OFT IS THE DEVIL!!1
    11. Re:So who will win the PR war by LordSnooty · · Score: 1

      This goes out to all the pedants out there: grow the fuck up

      Tell me, will you still be of that view wen ppl strt tiping lkethis allthetime becos thy cant be BOTHERED to type correctly, or use a dictionary, or learn basic grammar?

    12. Re:So who will win the PR war by VAXGeek · · Score: 1

      "And there's a good chance I've swallowed the proverbial hook, line, and sinker on a troll, but it really gets old."

      You can't start a sentence with a conjunction!

      --
      this sig limit is too small to put anything good h
    13. Re:So who will win the PR war by cavtroop · · Score: 1

      Just to play devil's advocate: I was able to read your sentence just fine, and just as fast as a correctly spelled one. :)

    14. Re:So who will win the PR war by AviLazar · · Score: 1

      While we might care about spam, most voters will not rank that as a selling point when there are "bigger" issues at hand.

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
    15. Re:So who will win the PR war by Anonymous+Cow+herd · · Score: 1
      My personal apologies that we don't all speak the Queen's english, and that obviously makes it too difficult for you to apply your deductive reasoning skills to understand the idea we were trying to convey.

      Ironically, you've hit the nail exactly on the head. Grammatical rules exist to remove ambiguities and allow users to clearly express their thoughts. By not following rules, you're requiring the reader to try and discern the writer's intent for themselves. If the reader has to try and puzzle out what the hell you're trying to say, then odds are you've already failed (regardless of how good your point might be) and you've wasted your time.

      --
      Ita erat quando hic adveni.
    16. Re:So who will win the PR war by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ccn u stl der wot this teh santanner?

    17. Re:So who will win the PR war by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Spam sites get shut down all the time and spammers have other servers lined up to move to at a moments notice.

      That's fine. All they have to do is keep following the money trail... and they will catch the spammers.

      Shady business is part of life. One of the government's primary job is to continually put pressure on business scams... whether it's Enron, United, fake drug peddlers and child porn peddlers.

    18. Re:So who will win the PR war by itchy92 · · Score: 1

      I respect the english language. I respect the phenomenal linguistic capabilities bestowed upon us by evolution/god/whatever. But this is a casual discussion forum, not a college term paper.

      I agree that it's sad that people don't possess a basic understanding of grammar and spelling (and common sense, and rational thought, and...). However, if you are able to discern the ideas conveyed in someone's post accurately enough to point out their grammatical errors, I suggest letting it go. There's an overwhelmingly large amount of stupidity out there; I recommend picking worthwhile battles.

      --
      Slashdot: News for nerds. Stuff tha-- MICRO$OFT IS THE DEVIL!!1
    19. Re:So who will win the PR war by itchy92 · · Score: 1

      Oh, how I loathe you... ;-)

      --
      Slashdot: News for nerds. Stuff tha-- MICRO$OFT IS THE DEVIL!!1
    20. Re:So who will win the PR war by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good that they got some immigrant crimester Jews

    21. Re:So who will win the PR war by ErikZ · · Score: 1

      Yeah, arresting people who break the law doesn't do anything. There are still people out there breaking the law.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    22. Re:So who will win the PR war by Tassach · · Score: 1
      But this is a casual discussion forum, not a college term paper
      Someone once said, "Never write anything that you wouldn't want to see attributed to you on the front page of the New York Times".

      A casual email sent to a friend can wind up being forwarded around the world. A quick set of notes you type up for a coworker can wind up on the CEO's desk. The point is that an electronic document can live forever and reach an audience far beyond what you intended.

      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
  2. They have been shutdown pending the outcome... by garcia · · Score: 2, Troll

    "This type of spam is more than just an annoyance to consumers," said Mr Reilly. "It poses a real danger to people who may be fooled into buying counterfeit versions of prescription drugs or unwittingly open e-mail links to sexually explicit websites."

    Is this similar to states that send out notifications to their employees and citizens that buying drugs from Canada is acceptable, encouraged, and more inexpensive than buying them from any pharmacy in their local area? I guess I'm in danger.

    In this day and age, if you open an email from someone you don't know and see links and you click them you are not unwittingly doing anything. You are just a nitwit.

    Under the lawsuit Mr Reilly wants the defendants fined for breaking state and national laws outlawing spam. He also wants them to repay people who lost money because of the huge amounts of spam mail that was sent.

    Brought the hammer down? They haven't been convicted of anything yet. They have had their websites shutdown until they go to court and fight the lawsuit. Let's not make this any more "sensational" then it already is. Thanks.

    1. Re:They have been shutdown pending the outcome... by Linker3000 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In this day and age, if you open an email from someone you don't know and see links and you click them you are not unwittingly doing anything. You are just a nitwit.

      Yep - but if you're 'on the road' or even on a pay per minute dial-up connection then receiving this crap costs you money even if you just initially download the headers.

      --
      AT&ROFLMAO
    2. Re:They have been shutdown pending the outcome... by ProfaneBaby · · Score: 1

      They have had their websites shutdown until they... ... form a new company, get new checks, and open new websites in different states.

      It's a nice story, but it won't change much until people are behind bars.

      --
      Video Phone Blogs send video messages straight to the web.
    3. Re:They have been shutdown pending the outcome... by no+haters · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Good Lord, who crapped in your cheerios this morning? A couple notes to your tirade:

      1) Counterfeit versions of prescription drugs != drugs from Canada; that should be fairly obvious.

      2) Clicking on a link that says it will take you to one thing, then takes you to another is most certainly doing something "unwittingly". Whether or not that person is a nitwit is irrelevant.

      3) I would absolutely classify shutting down a spam gangs ring of websites as "bringing the hammer down". They are no longer operational, and are in court. The only thing left to do is to convict them and make them pay monetary damages.

      Sheesh, mellow out, you should be happy you might actually start getting less spam.

    4. Re:They have been shutdown pending the outcome... by rjelks · · Score: 1

      Charges haven't been filed against them as individuals. The attorney general (Mass.) is trying to get a court order to shut down the sites. Charges will probably come later, but they think the "Ringleader" is in Russia. I'm personally glad to see state attorney generals fighting the battle against the spam/spyware.

      Microsoft was actauly to one to provide Reilly with the information.

    5. Re:They have been shutdown pending the outcome... by donarb · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Impossible. If you run a server, you get spam. You may filter it out before it hits your inbox, but it still travels down the wire to your box. You should care, spam anywhere costs EVERYBODY.

    6. Re:They have been shutdown pending the outcome... by Schemat1c · · Score: 4, Insightful

      And I will state again, anyone who clicks a link in any email that came from some unknown original is a fucking nitwit -- regardless of what it claims to be.

      The general public is not as educated on the subject as you are. What about some elderly person who just got a computer as a present so that their grandkids can send email. Are they a nitwit because they click on a link that says cheaper prescriptions?

      These spammers are predators and this action is a good thing. Just because you are too 'smart' to be fooled by these people doesn't make everyone else a nitwit. Self-righteous geeks really bother me. Remember, it's because most people aren't computer literate or even want to be that keeps us geeks working.

      --

      "Nobody knows the age of the human race, but everybody agrees that it is old enough to know better." - Unknown
    7. Re:They have been shutdown pending the outcome... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit. You block EVERYTHING from .kr, .cn, .tw, comcast/rr, and hotmail/yahoo. I don't care if those people can't get to me. If they are dumb enough to use their ISPs email and/or webmail then I have no use for them.

    8. Re:They have been shutdown pending the outcome... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't get spam so I don't care. I am smart about my email and I run my own server. I take the time to make sure I don't get any. I don't need the government doing it for me.

      We can't have a spam story posted without a bunch of self-congralulating oh-so-superior types yammering about how perfectly spam-free they are. OK, fine, you're wonderful. But the galling part is this:

      As far as your opinion on "bringing the hammer down" -- it's irrelevant. It's not "bring the hammer down" until they are found guilty and put away. Get over yourself.

      So after the whole "I'm so above spam" pararaph, you then declare (without any support) that your opinion of a colloquialism is simply the only correct one - then you say GET OVER YOURSELF?!?

      It brings pots and kettles and blackness to mind. Sheesh!

    9. Re:They have been shutdown pending the outcome... by Tenebrous · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't see the hammer falling either. According to our experts, "Offered for sale on the websites were pornography, pills, pirated software and fake fancy watches."

      Well, let's see. If the porn is against the law, why isn't the MA atty. general obtaining a court order to shut down the retailer, wholesale distributor and producer? Then there's pills, of no specified type. Pirated software is Micro$oft's problem. Let Gates hire a few leg breakers and handle it.

      But those fake fancy watches, now... I had one of those once. I thought it was a Rolex until my wrist turned green. Then I discovered the fake fancy watch wouldn't keep time correctly, so I missed class again. Then my girl friend saw that I was wearing a fake fancy watch instead of a real fancy watch and denounced me as a cheapskate redneck with no class and left me for a delivery boy, and my pickup truck got repossessed, and my Mom hates me, and my dog bit me on the leg, and...

      well, I've had enough of those fake fancy watches. They're dangerous!

    10. Re:They have been shutdown pending the outcome... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh God, think of the children. You are just another product of today's media blabber. Go back to your corner.

    11. Re:They have been shutdown pending the outcome... by pjrc · · Score: 1
      Shutting down their websites, only to have them flee, change identies, and relaunch similar operations elsewhere is hardly "bringing the hammer down".

      Now, seizing their bank accounts, property or other valuable assets would be a start.

      Throwing them in jail would be "bringing the hammer down".

      you should be happy you might actually start getting less spam.

      Until their ability to flee and relaunch their spamming operation elsewhere is diminished, it's just too soon to be even remotely optimistic.

      Now, if the court ordered their assets frozen, AND their money was actually located and held, that'd be something to get optimistic about. Anything short of that and you can be pretty sure they're already on the run, money safely hidden away, ready to start up again elsewhere.

    12. Re:They have been shutdown pending the outcome... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't get spam so I don't care.

      Do you really need someone to explain to you why you should care? Good grief, this apathetic "gimmie tax cuts and go away" attitude is getting out of hand. What does it take to get people to see past their own noses?

    13. Re:They have been shutdown pending the outcome... by Dominic+Burns · · Score: 1

      Dude - I don't have the mod points right now to push you to 5 Insightful, but I would if I did have then.

      It's always heartening to see someone fighting the corner of those who can't fight for themselves.

      Cheers, dude. Hope you have a good'n.

    14. Re:They have been shutdown pending the outcome... by ad0gg · · Score: 1

      There's a saying, you can't con an honest man. Failing to do research is the fault of the victim. Greed is another fault(nigerian scam). Recieving spam, getting unsolicited phone call or having a random person guy approach you on the street to sell you stuff, are exactly the same. A person with common sense should easily equate these things. You can plead the ignorance case with spyware, viruses etc or running a command in some guys slashdotter's sig. But come on, its an unsolicted email.

      --

      Have you ever been to a turkish prison?

    15. Re:They have been shutdown pending the outcome... by TENTH+SHOW+JAM · · Score: 1

      Let me see...

      1) Open web shop
      2) Do spam run
      2a) ???
      3) Profit
      4) Have web shop closed by court order.

      Now if you have to move your distribution network away from your customers, (interstate, or overseas) then it is going to cost more to distribute. This means either a smaller profit margin or higher prices. Either way, purchasing products via spam advertised web shops is going to be more expensive, possible even than traditional methods of advertising. With any luck this will make spam a less attractive means of advertising to a web shop. This will hurt spammers, because they will be relying on getting sales before the web shop is closed and set up again.

      It is not going to be the solution to spam, but it will definitely make spamming less viable and seen as less legitimate by joe sixpack.

      --
      A sig is placed here
      To display how futile
      English Haiku is
    16. Re:They have been shutdown pending the outcome... by JuggleGeek · · Score: 1
      There's a saying, you can't con an honest man.

      Yes, there is. The saying, however, is false.

  3. No joke by superpulpsicle · · Score: 4, Funny

    My spam count has gone from "insane" to "alot". I guess we haven't arrested enough.

    1. Re:No joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      So when it gets down to "alittle" you'll be ok?

    2. Re:No joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "A lot" is correct. "alot" is proof that the writer is a lazy asswipe.

  4. Leo Kuvayev by essreenim · · Score: 0, Insightful
    Wow, who would've guessed he'd have a last name like that!

  5. Related info by Virtual+Karma · · Score: 5, Informative

    The "Internet Spam Gang," as investigators called the group, is considered to be one of the world's largest spam operations and has sent millions of unsolicited e-mail messages for items like pirated software and counterfeit drugs. The gang is comprised of seven individuals and allegedly headed by Leo Kuvayev, who lives in Newton, a Boston suburb.

    As reported by www.cio-today.com

    1. Re:Related info by Reliant-1864 · · Score: 5, Informative

      The home in Mas. is his mother's address. In 2001, when I knew Leo, he had an apartment and an office in Montreal, Canada. His main partner at the time had already been deported to Russia. The guy will do anything for money, including.

      That partner dealt heavily in trafficking of Child Pornography, and while I was working at 2k Services, even considered doing it through the office (I didn't find out about that until after I'd quit).

      He also runs online casinos with his own software that's got quite a record on Casino Meister

      His partner runs top100.org (including all the other domains on the same software) which is where a lot of child pornography gets trafficked.

      I used to work for Leo Kuvayev at 2k Services/ECash Services. I am grateful I quit years ago to move onto better jobs. I hope he and his partners end up behind bars. They have no ethics.

      --
      The universe is held together with duct tape and karma. What goes around, comes around, and gets stuck to your forehead.
    2. Re:Related info by Sentry21 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Some more related info, for those who are interested.

      I used to work for Leo, but I got out before things went from bad to worse. Other coworkers and friends, as well as my roommate, weren't so lucky.

      Aside from the flash designers that he was paying under the table and the animal pornography and child pornography that he's gotten into distributing (the story didn't mention that though, I guess it's unrelated), he was just a really shady character. He was good friends with Alan Ralsky (who, at one point, both had and used my roommate's cellphone number several times), and he was all for doing whatever he could to make money. Truly, to those who believe in the capitalist ideal, he was an icon for all.

      Leo is a Russia-born American citizen; the address in Mass. is his mother's address, but Leo has relocated to Russia (the article says he might be, but I can confirm this). Aside from the big screw-ups that the article mentions, he's also done such wonderful things as trying to dock people's pay so their salaries match other employees, and he fired me because the secretary, with whom he was having an affair, told him that I'd said I was going to quit (which I didn't).

      I don't feel so bad now that I 'worked' for him for a few months, fudged my hours upwards by around 50-70%, and then went on vacation after I'd made a few grand off of him. Oh well.

    3. Re:Related info by WormholeFiend · · Score: 1

      The gang is comprised of seven individuals and allegedly headed by Leo Kuvayev, who lives in Newton, a Boston suburb

      Shall we dub them The Spam Seven, write a script and sell it to Hollywood?

    4. Re:Related info by Steve+B · · Score: 1
      Shall we dub them The Spam Seven, write a script and sell it to Hollywood?

      Only if it has a happy ending (i.e. if The Spam Seven meet a fate similar to that of the protagonists of Spartacus or Braveheart).

      --
      /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
  6. Nice! by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 1

    As a resident and tax payer of Massachusetts, I'm glad to see my tax money going to something good.

    Now Mit just needs to bring back the death penalty for these bastards.

    That would be wicked cool.

    --
    Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
    1. Re:Nice! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      With all of the taxes you have to pay in Taxachusettes, some of it was bound to do something good...

    2. Re:Nice! by Marko+DeBeeste · · Score: 3, Funny

      MIT uses the death penality only in those cases related to CalTech.

      --
      Faith: n. -- That human impulse that drives them to steal appliances when the power goes out
    3. Re:Nice! by Foolomon · · Score: 1

      I think most Bostonians would be happy if The Big Dig were finished before Duke Nukem Forever is.

    4. Re:Nice! by dionysian.mind · · Score: 1
      I think that the punishment is supposed to be proportional to the crime... though I don't agree with the death penalty -- since it lacks point, reason, compassion, and especially creativity... I got the sarcasm though.

      Spammers shouldn't be killed; what would really be great is if they were forced to be human spam blockers in prison -- cleaning out e-mail accounts of spam BY HAND for 12 hours a day. Why should I have to buy a hardware spam blocker, pay for spam blocking software, or implement anti-spam mail server policies, when there is so much idle man-power that could be put to use!

  7. Good by DeepCerulean · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's nice to see some spammers getting sued rather than some 12 year old girl who downloads MP3s...

    1. Re:Good by DeathFlame · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Apples, oranges..

      These guys are being charged with breaking criminal law regarding spam.

      12 year old girls are being sued (not charged) for copyright infringement.

    2. Re:Good by nytmare · · Score: 1

      You mean uploads.

  8. Go after the root cause by kjfitz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is nice but as long as there is money to made sending spam there will be plenty of border-line companies jumping into the gap to replace others taken down. This isn't going to end until we go after the companies selling their products through the spammers.

    1. Re:Go after the root cause by Jarnis · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, but constant busts will increase the cost of spending spam.

      Only way to get rid of it, is to make it unprofitably expensive due to constant downage of servers & evasion of lawsuits being bombarded at you.

      Right now it's considered 'jaywalking', and therefore easy money. Once people start getting tossed into the can for it. For real. In numbers... THEN things may slowly start to change...

    2. Re:Go after the root cause by Jarnis · · Score: 1

      /curses for stupid typo..

      SENDING spam...

      (yeah yeah.. preview button.. bah.. humbug :p )

    3. Re:Go after the root cause by aquabat · · Score: 0, Troll

      If we're going to go after the root cause of the problem, then we should be prosecuting all these high end consumer product companies. I mean, if Rolex made a cheap ass $50 watch, then people would buy a genuine Rolex and the spammers would be out of business right quick.

      --
      A republic cannot succeed till it contains a certain body of men imbued with the principles of justice and honour.
    4. Re:Go after the root cause by homerules · · Score: 0

      We should go after the morons who respond to spam offers.

    5. Re:Go after the root cause by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 1

      no, because then people would buy knocked off Rloex watches, that are scratched, made of fools gold and are an extra minute behind every hour for $45.

      (yes, i mean Rloex)

    6. Re:Go after the root cause by bhima · · Score: 1
      Sure! So what's needed is a global clearing house reporting people who have send money to spammers so folks with a clue can stop by and 'reeducate' them.

      You know "Do you part... distroy the PC of a spam enabler today!"

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
    7. Re:Go after the root cause by farble1670 · · Score: 1

      agreed. spammers are had to catch, but the companies that advertise obviously must exist and be readily accessible or there is no point. an analogy would be arresting drug users. while i don't agree with law enforcement targeting drug users, i would hope at least that they apply the same logic to spammers and their customers.

  9. How does spam STILL work?? by alecks · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I am still baffeld at how and why SPAM still works?!?! Everyone i know complains about spam, even the most non-technical people... Yet, apparently, some of them still go and buy stuff...

    I'd be very curious to see some figures on how much money was spent on spam-started purchases last year....

    1. Re:How does spam STILL work?? by TomTraynor · · Score: 4, Informative

      The economics of it makes it worth their while. It costs very little to send out millions of messages. All they need is a few suckers to buy their product and they have already profited. For the software it does not cost much to buy CDs (I can buy them for about 35 cents/CD0 and the cost of the mailing. If they go via FTP for software delivery the cost is still lower.

      The spammers are playing on either ignorance or greed and it works.

      To get it to stop may well be impossible, but, we can do our bit to make the spammers life difficult. I do my part by having a homepage that friends and family can access to read about the latest scams/spams and I always try to educate people about why they should buy from legit local businesses.

      --
      Panic now, beat the rush!
    2. Re:How does spam STILL work?? by thinkliberty · · Score: 1

      It's not the spammers making money... it's people selling the spammers software and services... That is where the money is at.

      Like the 49 gold rush in California, the people that made the most money were marketing the "gold rush" and then selling the tools to mine/pan for gold.

    3. Re:How does spam STILL work?? by l2718 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I am still baffeld at how and why SPAM still works?!?! Everyone i know complains about spam, even the most non-technical people... Yet, apparently, some of them still go and buy stuff...

      Since sending spam is so cheap, spamming can be profitable even if a tiny percentage of recipients responds. People have been falling for quack doctors for centuries, and modernization hasn't made us any smarter. As long as the recipients keep paying for getting the spam, it will be around. This leads me to believe that filtering, while it makes many of us happier, will not solve the problem. A sender-pays system is much better. Think what life would be like if credit-card companies could make the USPS and you bear the costs of shipping their offers?

      I'd be very curious to see some figures on how much money was spent on spam-started purchases last year....

      That would be good to know :-) even an estimate of the percentage of people who respond might be sociologically interesting.

    4. Re:How does spam STILL work?? by mikael · · Score: 1

      Chutzpah: I read an advert in the small columns of the paper that offered to tell me the secret of making money through newspaper adverts for only $10.
      I sent off $10 - they sent back a reply telling me to place an advert in the paper.

      In reality, the spammer hijacks PC's through spamware, sends millions of junk E-mails,
      and gets a commission for every successful order, and can also resell access to that network of PC's to other spammers, along with your E-mail address, credit card information.

      --
      Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
    5. Re:How does spam STILL work?? by sac13 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'd be very curious to see some figures on how much money was spent on spam-started purchases last year....

      It's not so much about the total as the cost per lead generated (from what I recall from my marketing classes). Advertising channels are judged by cost per lead generated. To place an ad in a magazine, newspaper, on radio/tv, etc, it costs significant money. To send spam, it's a significantly smaller cost (virtually free if you already have the hardware/software/connectivity). So, even though SPAM probably generates a lot smaller number of quality leads per person exposed, it's still more cost effective than the alternatives... at least from a cash flow perspective. They obviously don't factor the loss of goodwill (which some companies actually assign a monetary value to in their accounting as an asset) in with their decision.

    6. Re:How does spam STILL work?? by danila · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When you see something useful, you tend to be glad about this particular message. Noone likes spam about seminars on accounting and employment laws, but when I got spam about logistics seminar, my sister (who is writing a diploma thesis on this subject) seriously considered attending it.

      Computer geeks might have the principles to not buy anything advertised in spam, even if they need the product, but the majority of people are not like this.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    7. Re:How does spam STILL work?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In some cases the person selling the product and the person sending the spam aren't the same. There are professional spammers who offer to sent x number of spam for $y, just give them the money and the message body.

      The professional spammers don't have to worry about the return/spam ratio, they just have to convince their clients that the ratio exists. As long as their clients think it works, the clients keep paying and the spammer keeps spamming.

    8. Re:How does spam STILL work?? by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I am still baffeld at how and why SPAM still works?!?!

      The CBC had an article a little while back about the spammer (Jeremy Jaynes)who was sentenced to nine years in jail. To quote the article:

      Prosecutors said Jaynes received 10,000 credit card orders in one month for the [product], each for $39.95 US.

      source: http://www.cbc.ca/story/business/national/2005/04/ 08/spam-050408.html

  10. Gang... :) by mreed911 · · Score: 5, Funny
    "Internet Spam Gang"

    BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! What's their hand sign? Do they go around flashing their USB drive covers to each other to represent their set? Do they have license plates with their IP subnets? Yeah, boyee!

    1. Re:Gang... :) by AnalogDiehard · · Score: 2, Funny
      What's their hand sign? Do they go around flashing their USB drive covers to each other to represent their set? Do they have license plates with their IP subnets? Yeah, boyee!

      They wear Hormel T-shirts and viking helmets.

      --
      Eternity: will that be smoking, or non-smoking? I Corinthians 6:9-10
    2. Re:Gang... :) by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

      They always come 'round and tag my mailbox.

      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    3. Re:Gang... :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      01101001 01101110 00100000 01100010 01101001 01101110 01100001 01110010 01111001 00100001

  11. I hope it helps by TomTraynor · · Score: 1

    I am not holding my breath, but, if this helps reduce the number of spam messages that hit my inbox I would be grateful. Several weeks ago it was hitting in excess of 20 messages a day and they were all so obvious spam. A number of them had sotware prices so low it had to be pirated.

    So far this week it is at about 2-5 per day. Not a problem as the filters identify it most of the time. A quick look at the sending name and subject line and I file it in the trash without looking at them.

    --
    Panic now, beat the rush!
    1. Re:I hope it helps by pilgrim23 · · Score: 1

      Many years ago, when Internet was a civil place, I would post my email address openly on Usenet posts in groups I subscribed to. Due to work constraints, I still have the same email address. Because of these factors, that address gets an average of 3 to 4 HUNDREDspam daily. I am EXPERT at filters. Even if these grandstanding lawyers, these Weasels in Suits do some good (which I doubt), other spammers will fill the shoes of these loosers.
      Once "the hack" left the realm of the geek "cool thing "(tm) and was wedded to advertising money, real money, the world changed.

      --
      - Minutus cantorum, minutus balorum, minutus carborata descendum pantorum.
    2. Re:I hope it helps by Reignking · · Score: 1

      I assume, then, you are running your own email server? In hotmail, I really only get 10 or so a day, and most of those are filtered out.

      --
      One man's Funny is another man's Offtopic.
    3. Re:I hope it helps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, he said "when the Internet was a civil place" - it became uncivil long before hotmail went live, IMO. :)

    4. Re:I hope it helps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whats really annoying is these messages I've been getting that don't get sorted into spam because they look exactly like real messages, but the thing is, they don't contain links to products or anything like that, they just have an image that I've never bothered to load (and its on multiple different sites, but they are all most definitely related).

    5. Re:I hope it helps by cmiller173 · · Score: 1

      Last time I checked my junk mail account at Yahoo was averaging 23 spams every 30 min. I leave the Yahoo spam filtering turned off but use a combination of YPops!(simulates POP3 access to yahoo mail) and K9(spam filter) to pull the mail to my local client. Out of the last 6000 or so emails arround 200 were legit. Occasionally I'll open the "potential spam" folder sort on sender and scroll through to see if any legit email ended up there.

      On top of that, my spamgourmet account has blackholed almost 100,000 spam emails in the last 18 months.

      If I only get 20 spams a day in my inbox it is a very good day indeed.

    6. Re:I hope it helps by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hotmail actually deletes most spam before it ever hits your inbox. Whatever got into your "suspected spam" box is just that, merely suspect. Without the hotmail filter, you'd get hundreds.

  12. Aw man... by inkdesign · · Score: 0, Troll
    Offered for sale on the websites were pornography, pills, pirated software and fake fancy watches.

    So what's the problem here?

    1. Re:Aw man... by debiansid · · Score: 1

      >> Offered for sale on the websites were pornography, pills, pirated software and fake fancy watches.
      > So what's the problem here?


      My guess is the fake watches. They wanted *real* ones at that price.

    2. Re:Aw man... by mspohr · · Score: 0

      So... where am I going to get my pornography, pills, pirated software, and fake fancy watches now?

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    3. Re:Aw man... by Dmala · · Score: 1

      Well, there's always that guy who stands outside the bus station...

    4. Re:Aw man... by gcatullus · · Score: 1

      So what's their contact information, as I imagine that they are selling their pornography, pills, and pirated software quite cheaply as their website is shutdown

  13. Drops what, a tiny plastic hammer? by Kainaw · · Score: 4, Interesting

    FTA: So far no formal charges have been filed against Mr Kuvayev and his colleagues who are thought to be behind the two companies, 2K Services Ltd and Ecash Pay Ltd, that sent all the spam.

    So, what did they do? They filed a restraining order to have the websites shut down. A RESTRAINING ORDER AGAINST A WEBSITE!?!?!?

    FTA: Two phone numbers for Kuvayev and 2K Services in Canada were disconnected

    So, he disconnected his phones and moved. How long until he sets up shop again?

    --
    The previous comment is purposely vague and generalized, but all of the facts are completely true.
    1. Re:Drops what, a tiny plastic hammer? by whereizben · · Score: 1

      Restraining orders are for more than just keeping people away from other people. They can be used to restrict almost anything a business/person/entity does, including using a computer or the internet. Effectively, this means a restraining order could restrict these guys from using the internet until the case is resolved... And so if they then spam, they are far more screwed.

  14. now if only the Mass Attorney General by Richthofen80 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    would file charges against the Big Dig Contractors, as well as the shitty state management, and the Mass Turnpike authority.

    While geeks are probably going to herald this as a great thing, a more cursory review might reveal this to be an easier way of filling the state's coffers, through lawsuits.

    A similar example might be how Tobacco Companies were sued and now provide a great deal of revenue to the states.

    --
    Reason, free market capitalism, and individualism
    1. Re:now if only the Mass Attorney General by doublem · · Score: 1

      ... file charges against the Big Dig Contractors...

      HA! HA! HA!

      Oh my word, I can't stop laughing. You got a big belly laugh out of me on that one.

      --
      "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
    2. Re:now if only the Mass Attorney General by pjrc · · Score: 2, Funny
      ..... might reveal this to be an easier way of filling the state's coffers, through lawsuits.

      I hear there's also lots of easy money to be made in persuing people who have monetary judgements against them by the courts, but skip flee, disappear, change identies, and presumably set up shop again to continue their misguided deeds.

      Now if only I could remember who those helpful folks were with this hot easy-money tip?

  15. FR! (first reply) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thank you for your kind and insightful response good sir, from your user history it appears that you have a history of insightful and provocative comments. Good day.

  16. So has has all the spam activity stopped? by debiansid · · Score: 1

    Because if it hasn't then its not as interesting as this.

  17. If they're shut down for good..... by spidergoat2 · · Score: 1, Funny

    ...where will I do my christmas shopping?

  18. Thanks!!! by dark-br · · Score: 1

    Now I want a license plate with my IP subnets on it!!!

    Where r my pills??!

    Damn this /.!

    1. Re:Thanks!!! by silentbozo · · Score: 1

      Actually, if you use hex, you should be able to get a 6-digit license plate that corresponds to a full IP-4 address...

      Hmmm...

    2. Re:Thanks!!! by introverted · · Score: 1

      But what would you put on it? "FFFFFF00"? Or just "SLASH24"?

  19. When is the fight coming to Florida? by BronxBomber · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Boca Raton, FL (which is near where I'm from) has been unofficially crowned king of spam.

    Given the area's high retiree population, this doesnt surprise me. After all, they can pick up their V1agra and c1alis practically right around the corner once the email hits their account!

    Read more about it at the Sun Sentinel.

    Between tracking sex offenders, fighting for Terri Schiavo, and getting slot machines taxed, theres little room for this on the legislative agenda.

    --
    ...both interiorlly, and exteriorlly.
    1. Re:When is the fight coming to Florida? by Electric+Eye · · Score: 1

      That's not surprising. Florida seems to be the new Wild West, since criminals are so drawn to that overpopulated hell hole. You're correct about it not being on any agenda for the politicians. They're too busy sucking dick for the Religious Right and taking it from behind from the developers that are destroying a once beautiful place.

  20. It's a good thing they waited by RealProgrammer · · Score: 1

    ... till after Mother's Day. My wife would have been pissed if I had pay full price for her Rolex.

    And I'm glad I stocked up on Cialis and Viagra for our anniversary.

    --
    sigs, as if you care.
    1. Re:It's a good thing they waited by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I didn't realize they came in one-tablet packages.

    2. Re:It's a good thing they waited by Quasar1999 · · Score: 1

      ... till after Mother's Day. My wife would have been pissed if I had pay full price for her Rolex.

      And I'm glad I stocked up on Cialis and Viagra for our anniversary.

      Dude, you married your mother? That's sick...

      --

      ---
      Programming is like sex... Make one mistake and support it the rest of your life.
    3. Re:It's a good thing they waited by RealProgrammer · · Score: 1

      Nah, but when you're as limp and lifeless down there as me, you need a truckload just to raise up a little.

      --
      sigs, as if you care.
    4. Re:It's a good thing they waited by RealProgrammer · · Score: 1

      Dude, you married your mother? That's sick...

      Mom's dead, you insensitive clod!

      That's why I need the pills to do the job.

      --
      sigs, as if you care.
  21. Go get 'em! by mwood · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Offered for sale on the websites were pornography, pills, pirated software and fake fancy watches."

    Wow, that's 98% of my daily home email even *after* filtering. [applause]

    1. Re:Go get 'em! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't count if you're filtering *for* them.

  22. Translation: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Offered for sale on the websites were pornography, pills, pirated software and fake fancy watches.
    1. hot teean slutzz dikk starved
    2. New product! Cialis soft tabs
    3. Adobe Photoshop for $20
    4. Italian crafted Rolex watches
    I've been getting all of these kinds, thank you.

  23. That's the good news, but.... by frozenray · · Score: 1


    ...the bad news is that the arrest of spammers still makes it into the news headlines - and that includes the dead-tree news, not only slashdot. This somehow tells me we're not doing enough to get rid of that scourge.

    --
    "There are already a million monkeys on a million typewriters, and Usenet is NOTHING like Shakespeare." - Blair Houghton
  24. Not the problem here by Mr.+Underbridge · · Score: 2, Insightful
    This is nice but as long as there is money to made sending spam there will be plenty of border-line companies jumping into the gap to replace others taken down. This isn't going to end until we go after the companies selling their products through the spammers.

    For this particular sort of spam, they're selling knock-offs of the products being offered. In that case, the companies whose knocked-off products are being spammed are very much the victims as well and certainly are participants.

    There are companies who deal with shady contractors for advertising, and six levels down it ends up in spam, but I don't think that's what we're dealing with here.

  25. Let's get photos by doublem · · Score: 0, Troll

    Dude, that's the next town over from me!

    If someone posts his address, I can get some photos of his digs. We can O'Gara The Spamma!

    --
    "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
    1. Re:Let's get photos by DragonPup · · Score: 1

      hey Doublem, I am in Watertown. let me grab my baseball bat and I'll meet you in Newton!

      Plus.. Tular's(or whatever they are called now) has great bread. :)

      --
      "Useless organic meatbag" -HK-47
  26. (checks e-mail) by elhaf · · Score: 2, Funny

    Nope, still all spammy.

    --
    Six score characters.
    Brevity being wit's soul
    I have enough space.
  27. List? by ThisIsFred · · Score: 1

    So how about a list of MTAs they're using?

    --
    Fred

    "A fool and his freedom are soon parted"
    -RMS
    1. Re:List? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They use zombie machines, and host their spam sites on chinese and brazilian bullet-proof ISPs, like CNCGROUP-HI (CNC Group Hainan province network), or Connect BR NET, reported there many hundreds of times. But guess what - they ignore all spam reports, and some brazilian admins are so clueless that they can't even shut their own network down right (or they just protect the spammer for all those bullet-proof money):
      http://groups-beta.google.com/group/news.admin.net -abuse.blocklisting/browse_thread/thread/1b8c61ebd de805eb

      More about these spammers is on the Spamhaus website:
      http://www.spamhaus.org/rokso/evidence.lasso?rokso _id=ROK4932

    2. Re:List? by pe1chl · · Score: 1

      Often you can block zombie spam by setting up a mailserver that strictly verifies the SMTP protocol.
      Delay the welcome message a few seconds, then first send a 220- line and wait some more.
      Any input before the final 220(space) line: goodbye.

    3. Re:List? by ThisIsFred · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the suggestions, guys!

      --
      Fred

      "A fool and his freedom are soon parted"
      -RMS
  28. Posturing for gubernatorial run by crow · · Score: 2, Interesting

    While I fully approve of this, it's important to note that this is clearly an attempt for the AG to boost his visibility and popularity for the 2006 gubernatorial election. It's no secret that Riley will be challenging Romney.

    That makes me question if he'll take a hard line and go for not only shutting them down, but setting an example for others, or if he'll take the easy approach of getting a settlement that makes him look good, but doesn't act as a deterrent.

  29. Economic Analysis by Veinor · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Suppose that the cost of stopping a spam e-mail at the source can be quantified, and same for the benefit for doing same (a stretch, but it's necessary for the following discussion). Then, society will stop spam e-mails as long as the cost of stopping the nth, (its Marginal Cost, or MC) is less than or equal to the benefit for stopping it (its Marginal Benefit, or MB).
    The MB is relatively low for stopping just one e-mail, since many filters stop these anyway. The MC, on the other hand, is relatively high, as we have seen. Therefore, the MC will catch up to the MB very fast, and very little spam will be stopped.

    1. Re:Economic Analysis by ScentCone · · Score: 1

      Therefore, the MC will catch up to the MB very fast, and very little spam will be stopped.

      Sorry, but I think I disagree. Your example treats stopping spam as stopping individual messages. But in the case in question, the single act of shutting these clowns down will stop untold millions of messages from being sent. The question is one of how we stop them, and there are different economies of scale depending on the target and the technique.

      For example: these guys can't make money without having something to sell. If a small number of commission-paying vendors were stopped (in their dealings with jerks like this), then the cash source goes away. Of course there is a very important place in the market for affiliate programs... but the most successful ones are those that carefully vet the participants, and that monitor the click traffic to make sure it's not showing signs of spammage. Dam up the cash when that's the right approach, and you'll remove millions of messages from the 'net in a single blow. Keep doing it, and it will cease to be the easy living that these guys probably first found it to be. Follow the money.

      --
      Don't disappoint your bird dog. Go to the range.
    2. Re:Economic Analysis by Veinor · · Score: 1

      I agree with you. However you can always scale it up to 'stopping the nth biggest spammer' instead of 'stopping the nth message', in which case you get that very few spammers will be stopped, although this may stop millions of spam messages/day.

    3. Re:Economic Analysis by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      you don't have to have something to sell to make money from spam just a way to get peoples money.

      ofc you violate even more laws if you do it this way but since when have spammers cared about that?

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  30. You used the magic word: *APPARENTLY* by schon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yet, apparently, some of them still go and buy stuff

    Yes, and I have a rock that *APPARENTLY* keeps tigers away. I can personally attest that I have never been attacked by a tiger while I had the rock.

    This is one of the myths about spam: that it must work, because otherwise spammers wouldn't be doing it. And it's just that: a myth.

    It doesn't matter if people buy things from spammers, or if people don't buy things from spammers. The spammers will still spam because A) it costs them nothing, and B) they *BELIEVE* it must work, because there is so much spam.

  31. Civil suit? by jcr · · Score: 1

    Surely there's plenty of criminal culpability here...

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  32. I've seen that act... by erroneus · · Score: 1

    ...wasn't it Gallagher who did that? He does watermelons and all sorts of food. I was pretty sure that Spam(r) was included.

    1. Re:I've seen that act... by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      That's SPAM, a trademark of Hormel Foods Inc.

      Yes, the caps do make a difference.

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
  33. smoke and mirrors by Exter-C · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Cases like this are a case of smoke and mirrors with a bulk of press coverage. In the end it makes very little difference until we see a drop in the SPAM emails being recieved by our email boxes.

    However on the plus side every little bit helps if we do see that little bit that these spammers have removed or potentially removed. Although im sure someone other spammer will probably just grow up and take over the room / bandwidth that the previous spamemrs where taking.

  34. clueless local media outlets by notnAP · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As a Mass. resident, I'm thoroughly amused by the local media outlets... I've heard from both WBZ radio and WCVB TV News the story with a lead in saying something like...

    "If you live in Massachusetts, you'll be happy to hear you'll be getting less spam now that..."

    I'd be curious to see exactly how much spam from these guys was destined to Massachusetts people. Oh hell, don't bother. Borders are so... 1900's...

    Peter

    1. Re:clueless local media outlets by Anonymous+Luddite · · Score: 1

      "If you live in Massachusetts, you'll be happy to hear you'll be getting less spam now that..."

      That's funny. If spammers had any way of figuring out what state recipient email landed in, and they actually gave a sh*t, they'd send to everywhere but their own jurisdiction..

    2. Re:clueless local media outlets by Anne+Thwacks · · Score: 1
      If you live in Massachusetts, you'll be happy to hear you'll be getting less spam now that..."

      the realality is of course "If you live in Massachusetts, you'll be happy to hear you'll be getting less hatred on account of less spam being send from you area"

      --
      Sent from my ASR33 using ASCII
  35. Re:You used the magic word: *APPARENTLY* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, it really does work. The cost of sending spam is like 0 and there are INDEED one or two idiots out there who will buy your stuff. People buy stuff from junk snail mail. Real spammers make enough money to live comfortably and maintain their spam operation. Scary, but true.

  36. I know people who buy things from Spam by doublem · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I disagree. I knew a couple of people at my former job who actually bought things that were sent to them as SPAM. One coworker bought a "Digital Camera" that had no LCD and about 2 megs of internal RAM. The software for manging the thing was full of spyware. Without the software you couldn't get pictures off it, and without the spyware, the camera management software ceased functioning, so he decided to leave the malware on his work computer. The Network Admin actually got a dressing down from the company's owner for uninstalling the spyware and thus "Breaking Dick's camera" in the process.

    I tried to talk to the guy about buying things from Spam. He and the other staffer who bought junk like that compared it to buying things from mail order catalogs. "We can't stop those either, and they're harder to get rid of then just hitting the 'delete' button."

    When A----- said, "If it was a scam the police would shut them down" followed by a glare that made it clear she thought I was an idiot.

    A----- later had problems with a credit card number being stolen. I asked her if it was the same card she'd used to buy the camera. I was treated to a 15 minute tirade insisting I was paranoid.

    People buy things from Spam, and have no problems with doing so.

    --
    "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
    1. Re:I know people who buy things from Spam by Vellmont · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I can believe it. There's a lot of very stupid, very naive people in the world who are also very insistent that they're right.

      It's hard to argue with these kind of people, mostly because they've developed some kind of reality filter that doesn't let through anything that questions their beliefs. I've always assumed that without the filter, their psyche would collapse under the weight of the truth. You can try to pick away at the filter, but if you suceed they'll only become enraged at your for exposing the truth (and revealing to them their own filter, which they like to ignore).

      --
      AccountKiller
    2. Re:I know people who buy things from Spam by YukiKotetsu · · Score: 1

      I was trying to figure out if A----- meant Asshole or Allison. Hrm.

    3. Re:I know people who buy things from Spam by gcatullus · · Score: 1

      Is it just me or does anyone else find it interesting that the fellow who bought the spamvertised product was named "Dick" The clueless purchasers compared spavertising to mail order catalogs, and I do hear that somehwat frequently, but a more accurate comparison is the products advertised in the classified sections of Cosmopolitan or Penthouse.

    4. Re:I know people who buy things from Spam by Tenebrous · · Score: 1

      That sounds like an item from the Shark Tank. If you haven't got your T-shirt, go ahead and submit it.

    5. Re:I know people who buy things from Spam by doublem · · Score: 1

      I've gotten three from that job already. I sent in the SPAM one, but it was never posted.

      --
      "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
    6. Re:I know people who buy things from Spam by doublem · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, the woman in question was an Asshole. Since name is not Allison, Asshole works nicely. I just hit the dash key a few times. Didn't count out any letters.

      --
      "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
    7. Re:I know people who buy things from Spam by e40 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      So true, so true. It happened in a big way in the last US Presidential election. No WMDs? Filter out. Economy in the dumper (though appear to come out)? Filter out. The Iraq war didn't make us safer? Filter out. We could go on and on...

  37. Legal basis? by crow · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So what is the legal basis for this suit?

    I'm hoping that they're using good old-fashioned fraud, false advertising, and similar laws. So often we see lawmakers rushing out to tackle the latest problem instead of law enforcement agencies using existing laws to crack down on the new behaviour.

    1. Re:Legal basis? by Ironsides · · Score: 2, Insightful

      While I do agree that those laws should apply, I wonder about one thing. For false advertising (as an example) are those laws specifically written to only apply to print and tv adds? Or were they written to be universal against any advertisement (I.E. E-mail)? Just making sure that they can legally be applied tothe situation here.

      Aside from fraud and false advertising, lets also add in trademark infringement (fake viagra, rolex), mail fraud (fraud+stamp=mail fraud), wire fraud (that one alone is enough to put them away for life), and a few others. Also, I'm pretty sure we could get the internet to qualify as a "wire" under these laws (so they would be aplicable).

      So I guess we should write to our lawmakers saying "Don't write new laws, just update the ones already on the books."?

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
  38. Actually, they do buy stuff from Spam by doublem · · Score: 1

    I know people (Well knew, I've changed jobs since then) who buy things from Spam.

    I went into more detail here, but the bottom line is there are people dumb enough to buy this stuff. The justification I've heard people give had a lot to do with people equating Spam with the catalogs they get in the mail. I've gotten a lot of derision from some people for claiming otherwise.

    --
    "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
    1. Re:Actually, they do buy stuff from Spam by schon · · Score: 1

      As many people here are fond of pointing out, the plural of "anecdote" is not "data".

      And as I said, it doesn't matter one whit if someone buys or not - spam will continue anyway, because there is the perception that it works (whether it actually does or not.)

    2. Re:Actually, they do buy stuff from Spam by doublem · · Score: 1

      the plural of "anecdote" is not "data"

      You're right. Even if it didn't work, the perception that it does will keep it going. It's not unlike a former boss. He recoiled in terror when I referred to George W. Bush as "The Shrub." He warned me that I should watch out for the Department of Homeland Security and started looking around as if solders were about to burst in through the windows to haul me off.

      The US Government is not, at present, hauling people off for being critical of the President, but the perception that they might was enough to keep at least one milquetoast from speaking up.

      As for data about people buying from Spam, that's out there too.

      One in five Brits 'buy software from spam'

      One in ten users have bought products advertised in junk mail.

      This thread, implies that the 10% number above is a bit inflated.

      --
      "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
    3. Re:Actually, they do buy stuff from Spam by Feztaa · · Score: 1

      I find it hard to compare spam with catalogs... the spam I get nowadays isn't even advertising anything anymoer, it's mostly in japanese (which I am completely incapable of reading), or just plain "filter-defeating" gibberish without any actual advertisement in it.

      Imagine going to Sears, picking up the catalogue, and finding that a) there are no pictures of anything at all, and b) the only pages that are not japanese are random garbage.

    4. Re:Actually, they do buy stuff from Spam by sunwukong · · Score: 1

      And as I said, it doesn't matter one whit if someone buys or not - spam will continue anyway, because there is the perception that it works (whether it actually does or not.)

      Considering other industries, spamming must've matured enough now that people are profiting by selling spam-from-home turn-key packages, i.e., heading down the pyramid scheme/MLM road.

    5. Re:Actually, they do buy stuff from Spam by petermgreen · · Score: 1

      As many people here are fond of pointing out, the plural of "anecdote" is not "data".

      if NOONE bought stuff from spam then we wouldn't see reports of people doing it.

      ofc how many people do it is a totally different matter.

      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
  39. Its not just the spammers by Zaai · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Lets not forget why there are spammers. Spam exists because there are advertisers and because we make it work.

    What else could help to deterr spam?

    Legislation could be more effective if advertising through spamming was also illegal.

    Also, if we, the end users, would more easily see what companies are advertising through spam than that would hurt the company's image and be a deterrent. An idea for a browser plugin maybe?

    Also adding to effectiveness would be to block sites of advertisers that are on the spammers list. For example, a firefox plugin could automatically check if url's are spam url's and hide the URL and the sites, if the user chooses to.

    We need more than just legislation against spamming, the driving source of spam are the advertisers!

    1. Re:Its not just the spammers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      But then don't forget, if you take that idea too far, Spam could be used to attempt to shut out compeditors. Say I'm starting an online book company and hire a spammer to send messages promoting Amazon.com. Now that they've been identified as a link promoted in spam, their url gets blacklisted and poof! You cut off Amazon. That's just cheating.

    2. Re:Its not just the spammers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Do you think that Joe Average cares if some company advertises through spam? It would be great if he did, but he just doesn't. Consumers care about low prices and low prices. Oh and they also care about low prices. It doesn't matter if the product is made by some 5-year-old kid in a sweatshop and advertised by spamming. Actually, an item like that would propable be quite cheap...

  40. I think you mean 8 by vivin · · Score: 1

    I think you mean eight hex digits for a full IP4 address:

    Dotted Decimal (normal) - 207.142.131.235
    Dotted Hexadecimal - 0xCF.0x8E.0x83.0xEB
    Dotted Octal - 0317.0216.0203.0353
    Decimal - 3482223595
    Hexadecimal - 0xCF8E83EB

    --
    Vivin Suresh Paliath
    http://vivin.net

    I like
    1. Re:I think you mean 8 by silentbozo · · Score: 1

      whoops, you're right, my brain short-circuited the problem. If you live in a state that allows 7-character plates, you can get *almost* all of the way there...

  41. RICO prosecutions are what's needed by swb · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Since this basically is an "organized" crime, what's needed is a RICO investigation. RICO (Racketeer-influenced and Corrupt Organizations act) is a special law crafted to fight organized crime. Essentially anyone knowingly involved in a criminal organization or providing it with support can face a shit load of jail time.

    One thing spammers DO need are hosting companies, internet service, a certain amount of banking services, and so on. The people providing them with these services need to be investigated as part of a RICO investigation. That alone will have a chilling effect, and there has to be a few prosecutions possible.

    Seeing THOSE guys guy down will do a lot to increase the risk of even doing otherwise "legitimate" business with a spammer, and thus the costs will rise even higher to the point where spam will not be profitable.

    Stopping people from spamming is impossible; cutting off their air supply isn't. The money goes someplace, and anyone getting a cut needs to start reviewing the glossy brochures for Federal Penetenieries.

    1. Re:RICO prosecutions are what's needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad they can't make buying from them illegal also. After all you can't buy counterfit products, illegal drugs, or stolen goods. Both sides of the equation should be hit.

    2. Re:RICO prosecutions are what's needed by IceAgeComing · · Score: 1


      Sounds good, but:

      I've looked at a website about RICO and can't find much information on whether it could be applied to international crime groups. Would RICO stop groups operating outside the U.S.?

    3. Re:RICO prosecutions are what's needed by swb · · Score: 1

      I think the whole notion of spam being exclusively an offshore thing isn't true.

      It's possible that some aspects of it may depend on offshore services (mail servers or web servers), but I think by and large key parts of it are controlled within the U.S.

      I don't think it's practical to spam from a foreign country as well as do everythinng else, including shipping products, from overseas. Too expensive, too many cultural and language barriers to overcome, and so on. Maybe there are some instances where you only deliver an electronic or other virtual product where this might work, but there are still probably U.S.-dependent angles you could work with (eg, denying credit card transactions or bank transfers).

      I'm assuming that some spamvertised stuff actually is "real" as in someone will provide a product in exchange for credit card numbers or something; I figure that most spam has to provide something that actually gets sold most of the time or no one would ever bother with it.

  42. Re:You used the magic word: *APPARENTLY* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it really does work

    and you would know because you're a spammer?

  43. I know what you mean by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Interesting
    My spam count has gone from "insane" to "alot". I guess we haven't arrested enough.

    I know what you mean. My spam has gone in waves over the last month. I'll have a couple dozen each day that elude the filter and then suddenly 170+ in a few hours. And these fake Rolex, Pharmacy and pirate software are the bulk of what constitutes these waves.

    I figured there was a new player in spam who had just increased their volume immensely.

    Under the lawsuit Mr Reilly wants the defendants fined for breaking state and national laws outlawing spam. He also wants them to repay people who lost money because of the huge amounts of spam mail that was sent.

    He's letting them off easy. I want them fileted.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  44. From TFA by DeepCerulean · · Score: 1

    "The lawsuit alleges the spammers broke state consumer-protection laws, as well as a federal anti-spam law known as CAN-SPAM, and seeks restitution for anyone who lost money because of the operation, as well as fines, court costs and other relief." This isn't a criminal trial.

    1. Re:From TFA by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 1

      is it just me, or does the CAN-SPAM law's name read more like "you CAN SPAM thanks to this laws loopholes" than "put SPAM in the trash CAN

    2. Re:From TFA by DeathFlame · · Score: 1

      So...

      Since when does not the person who lost money get to sue for damages?

      That's like the goverment suing someone for downloading music, instead of the copyright holder.

    3. Re:From TFA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it basically legalized spam if you include certain things in the email.

  45. They're still rich by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Unless they go after the advertisers, the money will always be there. Companies and individuals are buying into this illegal advertising, but seem immune to its consequences.

    As for the spammers, is it so bad spending a year or two in jail to become a multi-millionaire?

    1. Re:They're still rich by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "As for the spammers, is it so bad spending a year or two in jail to become a multi-millionaire?"

      Depends on who you ask. What price do you attach to STDs and a torn bunghole?

  46. Want to stop spam? by Run4yourlives · · Score: 1

    Fine Phizer.
    Fine whoever make levitra.

    I'm sure spam will stop right quick then.

    1. Re:Want to stop spam? by bhima · · Score: 1

      OK I read your posting history and you deserve it. Obviously it's not the mods... it's you.

      --
      Nothing in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious stupidity.
    2. Re:Want to stop spam? by edremy · · Score: 1
      They're not selling Levitra or Cialis

      They're selling L3v!tra and C !ali5

      Totally different stuff

      --
      "Seven Deadly Sins? I thought it was a to-do list!"
  47. Asia by grommit · · Score: 1

    Frankly, I'm suprised most of these spam operations haven't moved to most Asian, African or some European countries by now. From those locations, they're perfectly free to send as much spam as they desire with no fear of criminal prosecution.

    1. Re:Asia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hear Nigeria is a good place to spam from :P

    2. Re:Asia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually most European countries have a tighter SPAM law than the US...

    3. Re:Asia by Steve+B · · Score: 1

      Shifting the operations offshore won't help them unless the spammers themselves leave the country -- if they just try to run the spam operation by remote control, they can still be prosecuted/sued. Most countries that are half-decent places to live either have laws of their own or are willing to extradite perps to the US.

      --
      /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
    4. Re:Asia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They already are in Asia - I suspect most of his operations are located in Russia - but because he lived and grew up in Mass, gave them (the authorties) some (but very little leverage).

      Following the money trail, and putting pressure on the institutions, as shady as they are, will work if they step up the pressure. ECommerce institutions DO respond to reports or complaints against their "customers". Those that don't can face
      legal problems.

      Most spammers live in cushey condos in Florida as recent posts are stating, and it's probably true, but I assure you they are not spamming from their US locations. If they are not using the huge supply of infected hosts, then they are using shady Russian ISP's owned and operated by the Russian Mafia, or kissing up to Chinanet.cn for server space on their network, and who have NO incentive to shut down their source of that hard currency, the almighty dollar.

      It's high time the authorities wake up and smell the roses, and realize that spamming in an International issue and has to be delt with on that level. But the fact they are doing SOMETHING is good - but it certainly isn't enough.

      But in order to fight them locally, is far beyond the local authorities capability, but if every local jurisdiction would jump in and do the same, it MIGHT have some impact.

      I wonder when the spam issue will ever be on any future Economic Summits agenda? for whatever good THAT will do.... (sigh)

      j

    5. Re:Asia by Stonehand · · Score: 1

      Using an international intermediary / proxy, however, might make it harder to identify them. A John Doe lawsuit isn't very interesting if you never find out who John Doe is.

      And spammers probably aren't very likely to be extradited unless they've pissed off their hosts, since it's such a minor offense... even if such laws exist. You don't see China bothering very much to enforce its IP laws, for instance, to the point where its police tolerate the extremely open sales of counterfeit goods and infringing DVDs in shopping centers. The likelihood that they'd bother to cooperate with an investigation of a spammer isn't very much unless, say, he's spamming in favor of Falun Gong, in which case perhaps they'd rather send him to a re-education camp instead of extradite.

      Granted, you'd have to anonymize not only the spam, but also any transactions. But it'd still help.

      --
      Only the dead have seen the end of war.
  48. Re:You used the magic word: *APPARENTLY* by homerules · · Score: 0

    It works because the spam problem still exists.

  49. Still can't buy that revolver I wanted by Licorice101 · · Score: 0, Flamebait
    At least the AG is finally doing what he is supposed to do: protecting us from fraud and killer toys... rather than producing useless gun laws under the assumption that they are "protecting our children".

    Smart parents protect our children.

  50. Re:You used the magic word: *APPARENTLY* by mattyrobinson69 · · Score: 1

    two questions

    do you have any of these magical rocks for sale?
    do you only take paypal or can i just give you all my bank details and let you deal with it?

  51. I believe it when there's death penality for spam by Lead+Butthead · · Score: 1

    Nearly all the cases thus far felt like nothing more than a mild slap on the wrist. This is evident by the ever increasing volume of spam that floods our inbox daily, DESPITE all thse "prosecutions."

    --
    ELOI, ELOI, LAMA SABACHTHANI!?
  52. fake fancy watches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fake fancy watches: So were the watches fake (as in duct tape around the wrists)? or was the fancy fake (a.k.a. 'bling')?

  53. Time for eMail 2.0 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When is the email system/design going to be upgraded to a new level so spoofed headers, etc are obsolete? I wouldn't mind seeing myname@url.com and myname@@url.com with the double hats for the new standard. Everything so far has been a patch the way SP2 was to XP, it simply doesn't fix the issue.

  54. Cambridge hippies! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's because Cambridge is full of stinking communist linux-loving hippies! I don't understand how other top-10 cities in America could grow so large by eating ajacent communities and Boston couldn't cross a river.

  55. The traditional weapon of anti-spammers .. by AndroidCat · · Score: 1

    .. is usually a mallet, not a hammer. And it's swung forcefully rather than dropped. (As always, it's targetted and the spammer opt'ed in.) But whatever sinks their boat is fine with me!

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  56. Re:You used the magic word: *APPARENTLY* by Steve+B · · Score: 1
    Yes, and I have a rock that *APPARENTLY* keeps tigers away. I can personally attest that I have never been attacked by a tiger while I had the rock.
    This is one of the myths about spam: that it must work, because otherwise spammers wouldn't be doing it. And it's just that: a myth.
    It doesn't matter if people buy things from spammers, or if people don't buy things from spammers. The spammers will still spam because A) it costs them nothing, and B) they *BELIEVE* it must work, because there is so much spam.

    More precisely, all a spammer has to do is convince a few clients that spamming works. By the time the client finds out that, no, it doesn't, the spammer has his money (and religiously obeys the First Rule of Acquisition).

    (In terms of your metaphor, if you can convince some sucker that your rock will keep tigers away, and are not encumbered with an inconvenient attack of conscience, you can sell your rock for perfectly good money, notwithstanding the fact that it's just an ordinary piece of rock.)

    --
    /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
  57. And if you read this article now... by tilleyrw · · Score: 2, Funny

    You'll learn new, amazing, and fantastic ways to:

    Increase your penis size

    Reduce your mortgage

    Find a **REAL** African prince

    --
    This post encoded with ROT26. If you can read it, you've violated the DMCA. Handcuffs please, sergeant.
  58. next step: by justins · · Score: 1

    dispense some indiscriminate justice.

    --
    Now before I get modded down, I be to remind whoever might read this that what I am saying is FACT. - bogaboga
  59. Easiest Way to Bring the Hammer Down by Foolomon · · Score: 1

    ...would be to Slashdot the spammers websites. :P

    1. Re:Easiest Way to Bring the Hammer Down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But that would be exactly what they want - attention.

  60. I want a refund! by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 1

    Great, with these arrests now I'll never get that bottle of counterfit Viagra I ordered, get that great mortgage rate, or meet lonely local housewives.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
  61. Use spam filters and Webmail... by antdude · · Score: 1

    OK, not Webmail in PDAs but notebooks/laptops are good for this method.

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  62. actually... by Run4yourlives · · Score: 1

    I should change my sig... the dude gave up a while ago... so all my comments now are modded normally.

  63. That's not all by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It also accounts for 98% of the mail in your "sent" folder. [applause]

  64. They dropped a hamster on them? by Stankatz · · Score: 1

    I don't see how this is going to fix the problem. Unless they're really afraid of hamsters.

  65. Something interesting... by cr0sh · · Score: 1
    It's hard to argue with these kind of people, mostly because they've developed some kind of reality filter that doesn't let through anything that questions their beliefs. I've always assumed that without the filter, their psyche would collapse under the weight of the truth. You can try to pick away at the filter, but if you suceed they'll only become enraged at your for exposing the truth (and revealing to them their own filter, which they like to ignore).

    If you want an interesting explanation for this behavior, a paper about the theory (dopamine addiction and "M0") is available here...

    Now - I don't know how serious the authors are about this paper, and I have heard that it is a "bunch of bull" - but at the same time, these crys that it is false could be nothing more than M0 and dopamine addiction in those who are crying foul - because to acknowledge that such a thing exist is anaethema to its very existance, thus those already under the influence of M0 must decry it, otherwise M0 would perish.

    It sounds so very much like a weird conspiracy - shadowy, implausible, etc - but if you read the paper, and make the assumption that the paper is "true" (regardless of the reality for the moment) - it seems to explain a lot of behavior in many people and the society in general around you.

    Curiously, geeks in particular tend to not be affected by M0 - according to the theory this is why there is such bullying and such by others towards geeks (and similar creative driven individuals) because M0 needs dopamine addiction to continue to "live" - and where is isn't possible, a forced regemin of dopamine enhancement drugs are forced on these kids today to "get them into the fold", or if this isn't possible, other methods are used (ie, in other words it is possible to get a geek to become M0-positive - but such individuals are not naturally predisposed to it from the outset of life).

    Something I have found interesting from the paper - even if it truely is a load of bull. If you study the theory enough, and are of such a bent, you can use the knowledge of M0 (and other works) to "pick away at the filter" - so to speak, but in a very refined way. In such cases, most of the time the individual will become "enraged" (and why is covered by the paper) - but in some cases, it is possible to cause the individual to have a mental breakdown or disconnect from reality in some manner. It is kinda like deliberately inserting a subtle bug into code, and watching the system slowly grind to a halt. From my experience, these people tend to go into a weird "looping" persona, that makes even less sense than their old persona. I imagine though, with proper application, it might be possible to cause such individuals to have complete mental breakdowns causing them to seek psychatric or similar care - or possibly, in extreme circumstances - suicide.

    Read the paper - decide for yourself. Further realize that if M0/dopamine addiction truely does exist - that it is these self-same people who seem for some reason (probably because if it does exist, everybody else is "addicted") to "rise to the top" - becomeing the individuals high up in the power structure - CEO's and government leaders, even. Are we scared yet...?

    I only hope and pray that it is fake - but the theory of M0 seems to explain/coincide with observations of people and society I have made - I know that doesn't necessarily mean anything, but it is chilling to think about, nonetheless...

    --
    Reason is the Path to God - Anon
    1. Re:Something interesting... by RM6f9 · · Score: 1

      Fake or not, at first glance it's *functional*, which is, to me at least, terrifying.
      NLP (Neuro-Linguistic Programming) has a really solid take on truths, facts, and lies: Whether or not something is true is nowhere near as relevant as: Does it work? Does it contribute in a meaningful way to the organism/construct/group or model of which it is part?
      That m0 paper should be required reading for every schoolteacher and parent. Thank you for linking to it.

      --
      Take the 90-Day Challenge! http://rwmurker.bodybyvi.com/
  66. Are they still close to him? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can these people still get close to this guy? Perhaps close enough to stick a dagger in his neck?

  67. Populist AGs (Re:So who will win the PR war) by mi · · Score: 1
    fighting the fights no one else wants to touch
    Where are the convictions? "No charges have been brought," -- says the FA. New York's Spitzer's record is not all that much better -- most of his work results in settlements without admission of guilt.
    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  68. Suits we can do; We need Criminal charges... by Joe+Wagner · · Score: 1

    While its encourageing to hear of such suits, especially when they bring on TRO, I can't help but feel a little let down. Once AG's stop doing civil suits and start criminal prosecutions for spam then you will see a fundamental shift in the amount of spammer and the make up of the spammers doing it. Only AG or DA can do prosecutions, anyone of us can sue spammers. Our own suit file last month against Kraft/Gevalia for $11 million may help change their mind about using spam. (http://legal.hyperotuch.com/ They already seemed to be taking steps to change. However, one interesting note is that some number of news organizations never heard of the suit, ironically because their spam filters caught emails that talked about Gevalia. Makes me wonder if the defendants have ever stopped to evaluate how spamming may be hurting their word-of-mouth advertising.

  69. Spam by certel · · Score: 1

    Read a statistic someplace that said that spam accounts for 60% of the internet traffic. Die spam.

    1. Re:Spam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think there is something wrong with my spam. I keep getting emails that offer to increase my mortgage payments and decrease my penis size. Does anyone know how to fix this?

  70. I read this as... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I first read this headline as "Massachusetts Plops Whammer In Sperm Bank". And I was like, "nice going Ma-ha-sachusettster-meister!" while holding up a beer.

  71. it's the headers, stupid by SanityInAnarchy · · Score: 1

    Even if I only have to wait for Gmail to download a list of stuff in my "spam" folder, it's still a waste.

    OTOH, it would be much better to educate the public to the point where spam isn't an issue. Especially if every spam was responded to with some amount of tarpitting/DDOSing.

    --
    Don't thank God, thank a doctor!
  72. Some history on Kuvayev by swordgeek · · Score: 1

    Our boy Leo isn't the biggest spammer out there, but he's on the list. Here's some info from ROKSO:

    "Russian/American spammer, a spin-off or occasional partner with Alan Ralsky, Igabromiv and also the P/A/Y gang.

    Does "OEM CD" pirated software spam, child and animal porn spam, porn payment collection, and others."


    So let's see here: Animal porn, CHILD porn, associated with some of the very worst (Ralsky in particular)...

    Yep. Hanging's too good for him. A public stoning might be a worthy spectacle for someone like this.

    --

    "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
  73. Re:How does spam STILL work?? - THE ANSWER! by iamcf13 · · Score: 1

    If you HATE ads/on-topic self-promotion, DO NOT read further!

    Still interested?

    38 Million people worldwide have bought or will buy spamvertised stuff

    (NOTE: One of the webpages linked to at the URL above was updated. The estimated worldwide online population is now 934 million.)