Slashdot Mirror


MS Calls On Kids to Stop Thought Thieves

theodp writes "Microsoft is calling all UK kids aged 14-17 to enter its Thought Thieves Competition. Remember kids, finalists must agree to formally license all intellectual property rights in their film on terms acceptable to Microsoft. And don't forget to download your free Thought Thieves Poster!"

68 of 709 comments (clear)

  1. Please kids don't steal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's Microsoft's job.

    1. Re:Please kids don't steal by 0x461FAB0BD7D2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I wonder if an entry with some of Microsoft's own deeds would win.

      Of course, now that I've come up with the idea, no one else can do it, lest they defeat the spirit of the Thought Thieves competition.

    2. Re:Please kids don't steal by Proudrooster · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes they would... imagine if someone made a movie about all the companies that Microsoft crushed and stole from, just because they could. I know there is a much, much longer list of little companies who were lured in by Microsoft, had all their ideas stolen, and then cast aside.

      I'll start the list.
      Stac Electronics
      Burst.com
      Borland
      Caldera over Dr. DOS in UK

      This is almost a job for Michael Moore....

  2. Oh get to the youth. by Saven+Marek · · Score: 5, Informative

    No it's not the hitler youth, it's the Thought Police Youth.

    Just took 20 years longer than 1984.

  3. First grade classroom, two years from now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Ms. PEEAAABODDDYYY!! Bobby is stealing my THOUGHTS!!"

  4. Re:Don't bash them on this one by cwebb1977 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    don't bash them? They're asking kids about their thoughts on thought thieves just to get the rights to all those thoughts for a meager prize?
    Maybe you're right, those kids will learn the most from their own mistakes.

    --
    www.weberseite.at
  5. I'm speechless. by commodoresloat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I tried to think of some witty comments here but there is nothing I can say funnier, darker, or more ironic than the story itself. This is even richer than when the MS Front Page license including a clause forbidding the use of Front Page to make web pages critical of Microsoft. The gall of these people! This is a new low, though, even for them. "Thought thieves"?! Someone up at MS is having a huge laugh over this.

    1. Re:I'm speechless. by h4rm0ny · · Score: 4, Insightful


      Why not join them?

      (a) Because there are pleasures to be had even in making their lives difficult. You can't always stop people treading on you, but you can hurt their foot.

      (b) Sometimes the impossible can happen. Look at the Ghandis of the world. The will to rebel is latent in all the "mind-numbed" consumers - it just needs some ignition. If you wake up one person with your resistance, then there are two people resisting. And between you, you might encourage another two. And so on, and so forth. You don't have to destroy your opponent - you just have to make them give up.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
    2. Re:I'm speechless. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually I think it's quite ingenious: They ask what you would do if your creative ideas where "stolen" in the sense that someone else declared them his idea. That's subtly different from what the BSA, RIAA and MPAA are fighting. Nobody tries to pass MS Office as his own creation. But most people would agree that doing so would not be right. Even the most hardcore warez guys take attribution very seriously. So there, "intellectual property" intermingled with a topic that most people can agree on.

      Copyrights, patents and other non-tangible goods are a complicated topic, but if you can dictate the terms which are used in the discussion, you've almost won, as far as the general public is concerned.

      Oh, I hope you got the memo: It's "Thieves" now. "Pirates" have too much of a romantic connotation (thanks MPAA!).

    3. Re:I'm speechless. by inio · · Score: 5, Funny
      I would be pissed off as a parent if my child was brainwashed by such Nazi propaganda. Yes, I said Nazi and I meant it


      Unfortunately, this means you lose. Sorry.
    4. Re:I'm speechless. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      EVERY web page made with FrontPage is a criticism of Microsoft...

    5. Re:I'm speechless. by ThePromenader · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There's something profoundly wrong with the idea that ideas can be property. Every time I want to go to the supermarket I don't get out my sketchpad and re-invent the wheel and the combustion motor - a car is ideas built on ideas built on generations of ideas!

      What can protected is the material product that results from an idea - and that only against 'product cloning'. If you want to be the first in the game you have to be the first and you have to use your lead to remain the best if you want to stay there. So the market should be.

      Which makes MS's attitude not only belligerant, but cowardly.

      --

      No, no sig. Really.

      ThePromenader
    6. Re:I'm speechless. by masklinn · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No it doesn't, the Godwin Point is only reached when comparing to nazis ... your oponents in a discussion.
      GP compared MS propaganda to nazi's, he didn't compare YOU (or pro-MS /. lurkers) to nazis, nor did he directly compare MS guys to nazis, his post therefore doesn't qualify as "reaching the godwin point".

      The godwin point is reached when you're so out of arguments that you have to rely on the worst ad-hominem attacks (comparing your oponents to the worst kind of suckers ever) to try to make a point...

      --
      "The way we can tell it's C# instead of Haskell is because it's nine lines instead of two." -- wadler
  6. Lame. by Seumas · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Thought Theives? So if I have an idea, never share it with anyone and never act on it or put it into any real tangible form and someone else has the same idea and acts on it, they're a thief and I'm a victim?

    Talk about poorly labeled.

    Oh well. Nothing surprises me anymore. I just hope kids remain indifferent enough that they don't buy into this. What's unfortunate is that I think - if they get to these kids early enough - they'll change their attitudes for life. Kind of like those school programs that convince second graders that their parents are evil if they smoke and that they're alcoholics if they have a glass of wine.

    1. Re:Lame. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I just hope kids remain indifferent enough that they don't buy into this. What's unfortunate is that I think - if they get to these kids early enough - they'll change their attitudes for life.

      I had the same worry up until a few years ago. I was on a bus in London and some kids wanted to tag the bus. However, Britain being the camera society that it is they would have been caught on film.

      Two of the girls staged an argument on the stairs and blocked the view of the camera. The boy sneaked up behind them and tagged the stairs. Even though it was an act of vandalism it revived my faith in human nature and I had a Jurassic Park like moment "life will always find a way". Yeah, I think the kids will be fine...

  7. Some advice by Renegade+Lisp · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Start earlier, Microsoft. You won't be able to make somebody aged 14-17 think something that he would not naturally think. Especially when your method has indoctrination so obviously written all over it.

    So start earlier. I recommend early childhood, age 4-6. I recommend showing movies to those kids where "thought thieves" are evil, dark figures that, preferably, linger under kids' beds. You'll make very powerful subconscious fears your ally that way.

    Alternatively, start later. Most teenagers and students will really like the idea of sharing thoughts, and software, and music, and they will only part with it when they enter business life and get a chance to make money themselves by stopping to share. I recommend offering every potential free software/open source developer a large amount of money if they license their stuff to you, exclusively. If that doesn't work, offer them a job at Microsoft, and pay them well. Very well. You might be able to stem the tide that way.

    But seriously, I don't think you will. There have always been developments in history that were so natural and unstoppable that it made those who tried to stop them extremely funny to look at. You're in the process of becoming such a comic figure, Microsoft.

    1. Re:Some advice by Seumas · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't know... in America, a shocking percentage of highschool students think free speech goes too far and that the government should have to "okay" everything that is reported in the press and that people have too much free speech.

      I would say the school system has already done half of the job for Microsoft.

    2. Re:Some advice by Motherfucking+Shit · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Who are you quoting? And if you can name a source for your "statistic" who funded the poll and for what purpose? I am skeptical of most polls because their objective isn't always stated up front, their samples of the population are too small, and the questions can sometimes be misleading.
      It's not like it's particularly difficult to find it yourself.

      How about this, "One in three U.S. high school students say the press ought to be more restricted, and even more say the government should approve newspaper stories before readers see them, according to a survey being released today." 112,003 high school students were surveyed, that doesn't seem like too small a population to me.
      --
      "BSD: Free as in speech. Linux: Free as in beer. Windows 10: Free as in herpes." --Man On Pink Corner in #52607549.
    3. Re:Some advice by Seumas · · Score: 3, Informative

      Um... Do a google search. Name a newspaper or a news site - from drudge and slashdot to msnbc and indymedia and usatoday, they've all reported it this year. Not sure how you could have possibly missed that?

      http://www.usatoday.com/news/education/2005-01-30- students-press_x.htm


      One in three U.S. high school students say the press ought to be more restricted, and even more say the government should approve newspaper stories before readers see them, according to a survey being released today.

      The survey of 112,003 students finds that 36% believe newspapers should get "government approval" of stories before publishing; 51% say they should be able to publish freely; 13% have no opinion.

      Asked whether the press enjoys "too much freedom," not enough or about the right amount, 32% say "too much," and 37% say it has the right amount. Ten percent say it has too little.

      The survey of First Amendment rights was commissioned by the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation and conducted last spring by the University of Connecticut. It also questioned 327 principals and 7,889 teachers.

    4. Re:Some advice by Motherfucking+Shit · · Score: 3, Interesting
      We all know that teachers like to pass-the-buck, but that's ridiculous. If four hours of television destroys all that your eight hours of class time imparts on a child, then you're a crappy teacher, district or administration.
      I don't know where you live, but around here, high school teachers (that is, those who would be teaching 14-17 year olds) don't get eight hours of class time a week, let alone every day. Four hours of television a day can easily counteract what's being taught to the student one hour a day, five days a week.

      Say you spend an hour talking about the tenets of free speech, and how the freedom to criticize elected officials is guaranteed by the Constitution. Then the student goes home and watches an hour of TV news, pumping fear-stories about "There is a website publishing pictures that could help terrorists attack us!" (cryptome.org) and "One website claims that the Microsoft software you use could be insecure and get you infected with a virus! What?! These people must be crazy!" (slashdot.org).

      Maybe they run a story about how a group of people dared - dared, since questioning the government is now officially unAmerican - to confront Republican Senator Bill Frist while he was parked illegally, buying shoes next to a known Democratic lobbying organization's headquarters. And it's the protestors who are being criticized, nevermind the fact that the Senator is parked illegally, or that he chose to shop right next to his opponents' HQ. No, the story is that "poor Bill Frist got protested." Damned "liberal" media again!

      Or they show video footage of people in a "Free Speech Zone," with a subtle comment about how those protestors are really are getting riled up, maybe they're violent, thank God they're caged up inside the chain-link fence of the "Free Speech Zone." And that video clip of people in a "Free Speech Zone" negates what you tried to impart to your students, the fact that the entire United States of America is a free speech zone, that the term "Free Speech Zone" didn't come about until the Bush administration, and that you don't necessarily need a permit to assemble peaceably.

      Perspectives can be altered. Easily. Especially in younger minds. I hope that by age 17, most Americans have developed enough critical thinking skills to make their own determinations, but at 14, I'd bet that most teens base their decisions upon what their parents say and what they've learned to be the "popular opinion." And popular opinions don't come from the History Teacher.

      I'm not a teacher by profession (though I'm happy to impart knowledge about any topic with which I'm familiar, anytime, to anyone, of any age) - I don't have it in me to do that day in and day out - but I have enormous amounts of respect for those who are.
      --
      "BSD: Free as in speech. Linux: Free as in beer. Windows 10: Free as in herpes." --Man On Pink Corner in #52607549.
  8. The Thought Police! by Xpilot · · Score: 5, Funny

    Microsoft brings us Orwell's grand vision of 1984, but 21 years late. Slipped deadlines, that is so typical of Microsoft.

    --
    "Backups are for wimps. Real men upload their data to an FTP site and have everyone else mirror it." -- Linus Torvalds
  9. Screw a PDF by caryw · · Score: 4, Insightful

    JPEG of the "Thought Thieves Poster"

    Microsoft Thought Thieves? Aren't they the ones usually stealing ideas from other companies? I can't think of one innovative and original piece of software from Microsoft.
    --
    Fairfax Underground: Fairfax County, VA public message board

    1. Re:Screw a PDF by Monkelectric · · Score: 3, Informative

      Hehehe yea, ask Stack how they feel about MS's thought theft :) (for those of you who don't remember, stack they made a HD compression program which MS ripped off 100%, drove them out of business, and then eventually lost a lawsuit to). Im sure someone else could mention at least 100 other companies they've done that to.

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    2. Re:Screw a PDF by archeopterix · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Microsoft Thought Thieves? Aren't they the ones usually stealing ideas from other companies?
      Yes and no. Yes - they thrive by implementing ideas from other companies. No - because it's not stealing. The whole "intelectual property" (and now "thought thieves") crap is language bastardized to make you believe that thoughts can be owned just like material property.

      This is how they want to legitimize the whole software and "business method" patents, extending copyrights into eternity and a whole bunch of other gimmicks invented to make benefit from "owning" thoughts.

  10. Ah, to be a 14-17 year old British boy by AEton · · Score: 4, Funny

    (And not just for the 14-17 year old British girls).

    I wonder if they'd like my entry "GPL Wars: Revenge of the Linksyth".

    "Anakin, don't use that code! It's a trap!"

    --
    We recently had heard in the office over one of the Yellow Machine that's made by Anthology Solutions.
    1. Re:Ah, to be a 14-17 year old British boy by 0x461FAB0BD7D2 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually there's an 18 and older category as well.

    2. Re:Ah, to be a 14-17 year old British boy by NetNifty · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I was thinking of:

      Starts with black screen and text fades in reading "Imaging working for hundreds of hours..."

      Screen fades to a coder sitting at a linux box with the sudo source code on the screen. Screen fades back to black.

      Text fades in "Finally completing it". Screen fades to display of coder falling back with a sigh of relief. Screen fades to black.

      Text fades in "Giving it away for Free".

      Screen fades to linux machine running Firefox uploading sudo to sourceforge.

      Screen fades to black and fades in text "15 years later... " Text fades out, fades in picture of Slashdot story of MS patenting sudo, story of MS trying to patent the internet again, story of Amazon one click patent. Screen fades to black, fades in text "Only to be told YOU could be sued because companies have "stolen" your idea and patented it." Screen fades to black and fades in text "No software patents. No monopolies on ideas."

  11. Newton by Alioth · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "If I have seen so far, it is by standing on the shoulders of giants" -- Isaac Newton.

    Microsoft only have got where they are today by standing on the shoulders of giants - people who were free with their (highly insightful) thoughts. Don't they remember this?

    I shudder to think how progress would get held back if each individual jealously guarded their thoughts from each other. This campaign sends entirely the wrong message.

    1. Re:Newton by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Microsoft only have got where they are today by standing on the shoulders of giants

      Microsoft have gotten where they are today by climbing over the dead bodies of giants...

    2. Re:Newton by Halo1 · · Score: 4, Interesting
      How about Shapiro ("slightly" more recently, and "somewhat" less known than Newton):
      Today, most basic and applied researchers are effectively standing on top of a huge pyramid, not just on one set of shoulders. Of course, a pyramid can rise to far greater heights than could any one person, especially if the foundation is strong and broad. But what happens if, in order to scale the pyramid and place a new block on the top, a researcher must gain the permission of each person who previously placed a block in the pyramid, perhaps paying a royalty or tax to gain such permission? Would this system of intellectual property rights slow down the construction of the pyramid or limit its height?
      --
      Donate free food here
    3. Re:Newton by Jesus_666 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I shudder to think how progress would get held back if each individual jealously guarded their thoughts from each other. This campaign sends entirely the wrong message.

      Dear <appropriate representative>,
      Microsoft's "Thought Thieves" campaign has convinced me that Microsoft has officially gone nuts and is a danger to progress and the society as a whole. I implore you to consider proposing governmental action against Microsoft while they still haven't indoctrinated our youth with their twisted opinions. The past has shown what propaganda is capable of and I fear for the future of the United States/the European Union/our country if Microsoft continues to mess with our children's heads.

      Sincerely,
      <name>


      This was the first thing that came to my mind when I read about Microsoft's latest scheme.
      Hmm, with a different wording it might be possible to drive German politicians into a frenzy over this. After all, we're still scared of the 1930's repeating; with subtle Nazi comparisons it might be possible to use German politicians to generate some bad publicity for our least favourite 300 pound gorilla.

      Any German Slashdotters who want to mess with our beloved "representatives"' heads?
      --
      USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
    4. Re:Newton by 26199 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Google for that quote... true or not, there is a fairly widespread allegation that it was sarcastic, used in a letter to a bitter rival.



      It's funny you should mention Newton's statement as being positive. I'm currently reading "Science: A History 1534-2001" by John Gribbin which suggests that his comment was in fact a barely disguised personal attack. It written in a letter to a scientific competitor, Robert Hooke, who had complained, correctly, that Newton was not giving him proper credit for his discoveries. Newton's response that he had seen further by "standing on the shoulders of Giants" was intended to rule out Hooke, who was famously short and hunchbacked. This is not 100% accepted history but it does seem to fit in with Newton's general demenour and behaviour.



      Apparently other people said it before Newton if you want to quote someone who actually meant it.

  12. Copyright Infringement Is Not Theft by AntiCopyrightRadical · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The subject of the videos is supposed to be 'intellectual property theft'. But as I'm most here know, copying something or using a patented device with out a licence is not theft. It does not deprive anyone of anything.
    No one can own an idea.
    If you want to claim you own data, keep it private. Once you sell it to me, it is mine, to keep or to give away.
    Copyright is immoral. If you tell me a story, you do not have the right to tell me that I cannot repeat it. Everyone has the right to say what is on their mind, regardless of who first thought of it. The mere act of creation does not give you any special rights to tell other people what they can do with their property.

    This is part of a pattern of major IP holders brainwashing children,
    there needs to be an alternative voice in the classroom.

    --
    Abolish Copyright. Restore Freedom.
  13. Here come the thought police by FidelCatsro · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Currently in my mind i am breaking a hell of alot of copyright laws.
    Songs that get stuck in my head , many many ideas , Songs i remember .
    I occasionaly hum a tune thats most likely copyrighted .
    I have an idea that may already be patent.

    When you start labeling copyright/patent infringment Thought theft then your walking on a really dodgy line. it really does sound incredibly facist .
    We should be teaching children to share and help others , instead we are teaching them suspicion and greed .. Way to go microsoft ..

    I really hope alot of kids send MS vidios depicting facist states Abusing its citizens in some cyber punk future where your thoughts are monitored .
    as it was the first thing that came to my mind when i heard thought thieves

    --
    The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
  14. Microsoft Propaganda Art by lousyd · · Score: 4, Funny

    You think that's funny? Try this:
    http://freetodd.org/MS-Poster.gif

    This poster was stuck up all over my San Diego, California college campus.

    --
    If aspiration is a virtue, achievement cannot be a vice.
  15. HEY! No fair! by Harker · · Score: 5, Funny

    I thought of that first!

    H

    --
    When VCR's are outlawed, only outlaws will have VCR's.
  16. Re:Hoax? by Zakabog · · Score: 5, Informative

    I have a feeling it's not

  17. Video submissions, eh? by technos · · Score: 3, Funny

    Everyone has bought a porn tape that was just too disgusting to watch. Or you know someone with a box full of hermaphrodite and scheisse-pron.

    How about we steam the labels off all of those and mail em to Microsoft?

    --
    .sig: Now legally binding!
  18. Haha by t_allardyce · · Score: 4, Funny

    Its funny because all the school kids will just log on to Kazaa right after this lesson...

    Seriously you can't brainwash 14-17 year olds its too late by then, at this age they are already burning CDR's, smoking behind the wall and trying to use the colour laser to print fake ID's and &pound5 notes for the local off-license! Ah the good old days, when VCD's where as easy to come by as that slutty girl in your class, and everyone was discovering sharing, memories... Kids these days with their Napsters and Torrents, they have it easy!

    If Microsoft seriously wants to brainwash then they're going to have to aim for the 8 year olds or lower. Do some classes where kids make macaroni and glitter pictures and then someone takes them and pretends they made them and then beats the kid to within an inch of their lives while playing Beethoven too loud, now that's brainwashing!

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  19. In other news.. by Gentlewhisper · · Score: 5, Funny

    Tony Blair announces that 1000 teenage thought criminals have been rounded up for thought crimes. They will be re-educated at the Ministry of Love and given a chance to repent for their crimes through death.

    In further other news, Bill Gates has announced that Linux is unexist. Purge all memory of "Linux" from your brains now to prevent being labelled a thought criminal!

    1. Re:In other news.. by Beardydog · · Score: 5, Funny

      Mod parent double plus good!

    2. Re:In other news.. by alphakappa · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Seriously, I can't believe they ended up using the term 'thought thieves' even though any thought-crime is strongly associated with '1984'. What better way to reinforce the big brother image. Whoever thought this thing up deserves a mention in the annals of great PR history!

      --
      "When the only tool you own is a hammer, every problem begins to resemble a nail." - Abraham Maslow (1908-1970)
    3. Re:In other news.. by Kierthos · · Score: 4, Funny

      Why wouldn't they have? It's one of the best early Van Halen albums.

      Kierthos

      --
      Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
  20. Irony by sfcat · · Score: 4, Interesting
    What if someone made a film about how the very idea of this contest is "stolen" from Orwell's 1984. Then showed goose-stepping soldiers dragging Bill off to a reeducation camp.

    All I can say is wow. Considering MS is the biggest stealer of ideas in history, the multiple levels of irony in this article make that Alanis Morissette song (or more precisely the fact that the song isn't ironic at all) pale in comparison. This can't be real. Would Microsoft be this dumb? Nah, I don't believe it. Good hoax though...

    --
    "Those that start by burning books, will end by burning men."
    1. Re:Irony by reverse+flow+reactor · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Here's another idea for a film. Turn the contest around and show how people benefit from the sharing of ideas.

      Setting: prehistoric man, living in a cave. Gork has the idea of rubbing two sticks together to make a fire. He finds that fire is indeed warm, and it is very comfortable to sit near it. The fire keeps him warm during the cold night.

      Grog is very jealous of Gork's fire, and steals one of the burning branches while Gork is not looking, so that he can have his own fire. He carefully takes the branch to his cave, and makes his own fire. Ironically, Gork's fire keeps burning...

      Grog enjoys his new fire, and soon realises that it is also very good for preparing food. Grog roasts himself a good meal. Grok is enticed by the new smells, and cones to check it out. He sees Grog also has a fire.

      Should he be furious and sue for patent infringement??? It took him a lot of work and time to figure out the proper way to rub two sticks together to make the fire. No, Grok tries the food and likes the roasting idea as well. He stays awhile and learns what Grog has been doing. Pretty soon, Grok is enjoying his own home-cooked meals by his warm fire, having benefited from Grog building on his idea. Both are happier and warmer because of the fire. Both have learned something new from each other, and both are better off for the sharing of ideas.

      fastforward a generation, and they are swapping BBQ recipies..

      --
      Please steal this idea and work with it. And then share it with everyone else.

      --

      The significant problems we face cannot be solved by the same level of thinking that created them. -Einstein

    2. Re:Irony by Halo1 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      All I can say is wow. Considering MS is the biggest stealer of ideas in history

      And so you are doing exactly what they want: spread the fallacy that "ideas" or "thoughts" can be "stolen". Even most IPR law scholars agree that "intellectual property" is something entirely different from physical property and that you can't "steal" it.

      The natural rights doctrine (I "made" it so it's all mine and mine alone) does not hold in the world of immaterial creations. It is introduced by creating artificial scarcity using laws, which should only apply in cases where they have overall positive effects.

      With their "How would you feel if ..." oneliners, Microsoft reaches out to the inner desire of many people to be able to get rich simply by being the first to think of something. It can however easily be reversed: "How would you feel if you worked 2 years on a computer program completely on your own and when you tried to sell it, all sorts of people would start asking money from you even though all they did was pay a patent lawyer to file some documents describing ideas they once had?"

      --
      Donate free food here
  21. Here is roughly what it sounds like in german by FidelCatsro · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Microsoft ruft alle BRITISCHEN kinder vom 14-17 an, um seine Gedankendiebkonkurrenz einzutragen.
    Erinnern Sie sich an Zicklein, finalists muß damit einverstanden SEIN, alle Rechte am geistigen Eigentum in ihrem Film auf den Bezeichnungen formal zu genehmigen, die für Microsoft annehmbar sind.
    Und vergessen Sie nicht, Ihr freies Gedankendiebplakat zu runter-laden! Microsoft in errichness 2005 JAWHOL",

    Sounds alot scaryer ;)

    --
    The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    1. Re:Here is roughly what it sounds like in german by slavemowgli · · Score: 3, Funny

      Erinnern Sie sich an Zicklein [...]

      "Remember the little goats"?

      --
      quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
  22. it's *not* illegal to 'steal' thoughts by mojoNYC · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Ideas are most definitely *not* 'protected' (see Lawrence Lessig's Free Culture)--it's only the tangible output of those thoughts.

    This is the M.O. of slimy corporations and politicians everywhere--they are basically lying to people through their gross simplification of complex issues (see 'pirates are bad'), misuse of language (this competition), and outright lying (too many examples to mention).

    What's next? 'Find the hidden pirate treasure on your parent's computer? '

  23. To quote Orwell's 1984: by todu · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This made me think about the childrens thought police games and later real life actions:

    "A handsome, tough-looking boy of nine had popped up from behind the table and was menacing him with a toy automatic pistol, while his small sister, about two years younger, made the same gesture with a fragment of wood. Both of them were dressed in the blue shorts, grey shirts, and red neckerchiefs which were the uniform of the Spies. Winston raised his hands above his head, but with an uneasy feeling, so vicious was the boy's demeanour, that it was not altogether a game.

    'You're a traitor!' yelled the boy. 'You're a thought- criminal! You're a Eurasian spy! I'll shoot you, I'll vaporize you, I'll send you to the salt mines!'

    Suddenly they were both leaping round him, shouting 'Traitor!' and 'Thought-criminal!' the little girl imitating her brother in every movement. It was somehow slightly frightening, like the gambolling of tiger cubs which will soon grow up into man-eaters. There was a sort of calculating ferocity in the boy's eye, a quite evident desire to hit or kick Winston and a consciousness of being very nearly big enough to do so. It was a good job it was not a real pistol he was holding, Winston thought."

    ...

    "With those children, he thought, that wretched woman must lead a life of terror. Another year, two years, and they would be watching her night and day for symptoms of unorthodoxy. Nearly all children nowadays were horrible. What was worst of all was that by means of such organizations as the Spies they were systematically turned into ungovernable little savages, and yet this produced in them no tendency whatever to rebel against the discipline of the Party. On the contrary, they adored the Party and everything connected with it. The songs, the processions, the banners, the hiking, the drilling with dummy rifles, the yelling of slogans, the worship of Big Brother -- it was all a sort of glorious game to them. All their ferocity was turned outwards, against the enemies of the State, against foreigners, traitors, saboteurs, thought-criminals. It was almost normal for people over thirty to be frightened of their own children. And with good reason, for hardly a week passed in which The Times did not carry a paragraph describing how some eavesdropping little sneak -- 'child hero' was the phrase generally used -- had overheard some compromising remark and denounced its parents to the Thought Police."

    It's good that I don't have children..

    1. Re:To quote Orwell's 1984: by MemoryDragon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Unfortunately that idea comes directly from Sovjet Russia and the german Hitler jugend. Actually that indeed does work to some degree, but only to some, many people who were in the HJ or similar Sovjet organizations still became nice and critical adults during adulthood, because there is always the factor that only a certain percentage of people are sheep.

  24. Re:It's not just Microsoft by SnowZero · · Score: 4, Funny

    I thought it was:
    Think Different;
    Otherwise you're Stealing from us.

  25. That explains it... by OwlWhacker · · Score: 3, Funny

    This is even richer than when the MS Front Page license including a clause forbidding the use of Front Page to make web pages critical of Microsoft.

    Ah!

    So that's why all the anti-Microsoft sites seem to display correctly in Firefox.

  26. Throwing Stones by donnacha · · Score: 5, Funny

    From Microsoft's poster:

    "So how would you feel if you saw your hard work being passed off as the property of someone else?"

    Gee, I don't know, maybe you could ask the guys who wrote the BSD stack?

  27. This whole thing is rather hilarious... by Gordo_1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    But is the Nazi parallel really that strong? To my knowledge, Microsoft hasn't been exterminating people.

    I think Godwin had something to say about this... um, oh nevermind.

  28. Who si the thought thief here? by alexhard · · Score: 5, Insightful

    From the website:
    Thought Thieves is about people stealing and profiting from your creation or innovation. Think about it: how would you feel if you saw your hard work being passed off as the property of someone else? What would you do?

    ALSO from the website:
    I will formally licence, on terms acceptable to Microsoft, all intellectual property rights
    in my film and agree to waive all moral rights in relation to my film if requested to do
    so.

    I mean.....WTF!

    --
    Infinite time means everything that can happen, will. You being you is absolutely incidental. You do not exist.
  29. Bounties Legal Confusion by knubee · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Many of the comments so far on this story have drawn the parallels to Orwell, etc. -- and the posts have been witty or outraged.

    There is another aspect of this particular "bounty hunting" campaigne that is fascinating, disturbing, and possibly original. Namely, it is deliberately rewarding and encouraging people to MISUNDERSTAND the law about copyright, patent, and "ideas."

    Would such bounties be acceptable if they encouraged other kinds of legal misunderstandings? For example, many people may erroneously believe "it is legal for me to download anything that appears on the Internet." Imagine if some large company provided similar bounties for films like this:

    "Stop Illegal Harassment! Illegal harassment is when some person or company threatens you to stop doing something, even when you are doing nothing wrong. It sounds like science fiction, but it happens all the time. Some people and companies are contacting individuals who download things on the Internet and threatening them. How would you feel if your brother gave you a copy of the book he just finished reading -- and the publisher came and threatened you for 'stealing' the book? What would you do? We want to know."

    Yes, the example above glides easily between different issues and concepts. But so does the Microsoft announcement, as it talks about "stealing thoughts" one moment -- and then asks how you would feel if people stole the *results* of thought, work, and effort.

    In either case, it is frightening that it is so easy to start the equivalent of a vigilante campaigne that plays on -- and encourages -- people's confusion about the law. Even more frightening is that such campaignes may be perfectly legal.

  30. Re:Contest over by ahunter · · Score: 4, Interesting
    No, Steve, I think its more like we both have a rich neighbor named Xerox, and you broke in to steal the TV set, and you found out I'd been there first, and you said. "Hey that's no fair! I wanted to steal the TV set!"
    -- Bill Gates talking about Steve Jobs and the GUI
  31. Re:Contest over by ChuyMatt · · Score: 4, Informative
  32. Re:Sort of relevant, but wrong by ahunter · · Score: 4, Informative

    You know, I intended this to be read in the context of what Bill was saying about Microsoft rather than what he was saying about Apple. 'stole the TV' is a pretty strong metaphor for thought theft.

    Bill Gates is pretty much admitting to 'Thought Theft' there: Microsoft wouldn't even have their flagship product line if they hadn't taken the idea of the GUI from Xerox and Apple.

    I guess these days, Microsoft is Xerox, and some darn kids are nicking their TV now.

  33. Re:MOD STORY +5 Iron by Ed+Avis · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not directly related, but this reminds me of RMS's story The Right To Read for some reason.

    --
    -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
  34. Re:Don't bash them on this one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Remember children, there's only one legal way to take intellectual property; through the fine print.

  35. What you said is so true... by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How can we ever compare common thievery with institutional thievery? Abuse of power? Please.

    Anyway, I used to be the kind of person who hated SW piracy to death (to name some "evil thievery" thing) - until i met REALLY poor people. And this was in 92, Linux was simply out of the radar. I realized that sometimes the law was evil.

    People grow, kids stop being naive. When they mature, they'll realize not everything's black and white.

    1. Re:What you said is so true... by timeOday · · Score: 3, Insightful
      And guess what? Our laws are fair, to both the rich and the poor. There are very few double-standards.
      Haven't you noticed that "captains of industry" who cook the books to reap millions in income and expense accounts are seldom punished, while stealing a loaf of bread can land you in jail?

      Haven't you noticed that slapping somebody will get you prosecuted, while starting a war on false pretenses and killing tens of thousands of people gets you re-elected?

      Haven't you noticed that international corporations have no patriotism, but expect us to send our poor to fight and die protecting their resources and markets?

      Haven't you noticed that rich industries write their own laws and buy Congressmen to rubber-stamp them?

      Haven't you noticed how Microsoft openly flaunts the law by outspending and outwaiting the government prosecution until political conditions are more favorable? How they build a vast empire on the ideas of others and then pretend that re-using ideas is stealing?

  36. Re:Don't bash them on this one by tomhudson · · Score: 3, Funny
    I hope i dont send in my slackware install disk by mistake
    Didn't you hear? Microsoft says open-source software is VIRAL. If you send it in, it will CONTAMINATE all the entries, and nobody will win! Think of all the old koreans!
  37. Subversion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why not give Microsoft exactly what they are asking for?

    A little movie about a small company that comes out with some cool new technology, and wants to give it out for free because they feel it will better mankind. A few months after its out it is quite popular in its niche and they are doing well from their ideas, they get a letter from a big company "Letigisoft" saying they infringed on a software patent of theirs. Our heros don't have much money for a legal defense, so they scramble. They know they can't keep their product functional and remove the infringing bit, they can't charge license fees, or afford legal costs. Plus, the patent claims being made are obviously very questionable, but they don't have the legal resources to prove that. Any attempt to go about against "Letigisoft" burries them in paperwork, and onerous disclosure requests that expose all their company's ideas to Letigisoft. So they end up with no choice but the close up shop. A year later "Letigisoft" develops a similar product and charges a lot for it.

    So do something like that with nice production values so the judges will have to watch it. Let it develop slowly, so at first you might not realize that its such a David getting crushed by Goliath sort of thing. Make them all confortable by giving them exactly what they want.

    Big companies who want all this IP fascism have to realize that they need to be careful what they ask for, because it works both ways, and they just might get what they want.

  38. Re:Enough!! by CherniyVolk · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You are seriously comparing one of the most horrific events of the 20th century, the slaughter and torture of millions of men, women, and children, to the "death" of a god damn office suite?
    Don't you think that this trivializes the real holocaust just a bit?


    The holocaust, was logically made trivial by it's own zealot like insistance in media and social passing as to what evil and horror amounts to when compared to other attrocities at the very same time.

    May I be the first to say:

    Don't get angry when someone makes trivial remarks about the holocaust if you don't show the same typical ogligatory social comebacks with the following.

    1) Stalin (Gulags)
    Hitler only dreamed of killing as many people.
    2) Churchill (Dresdon Germany)
    Hitler could only dream of the cruelity. And, I don't give a damn what the Brits think about Churchill.
    3) Vietnam (US killed just as many vietnamese, many of them innocent)
    4) Po Pot
    5) Ghengis Khan
    6) Truman (Hiroshima/Nagasaki)

    Hitler wasn't the worst. He wasn't even the worst in his time. Stalin was, by far. So, why don't you get all upset if someone jokes about the Russian Gulags? At least Hitler had a target and had enough sense to pick on someone else. And, stop acting as if there is some measure to define the barbarism and cruelity of any man, becuase frankly there isn't a group of people on this planet that isn't shamed by some part of their own history. Ask the Palestinians how they feel today!

  39. Moral rights Waver by yeba_ireland · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I think it needs to be pointed out explicitly that due to their release form microsoft are takening away the moral right of an author to be named as an author of a piece of work. http://www.msn.co.uk/img/en/en-gb/portal/specials/ thoughtthieves/14_form.pdf
    I will formally licence, on terms acceptable to Microsoft, all intellectual property rights in my film and agree to waive all moral rights in relation to my film if requested to do so. I understand that if I do not complete the necessary documentation by the stated date, my entry will be disqualified from the competition.
    Moral rights are defined witihin Article 6bis of the Berne Convention which protects attribution and integrity, stating:
    Independently of the author's economic rights, and even after the transfer of the said rights, the author shall have the right to claim authorship of the work and to object to any distortion, mutilation or other modification of, or other derogatory action in relation to, the said work, which would be prejudicial to his honor or reputation. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moral_rights
    So Microsoft is asking this kids to give up your right to stop people from passing off their hard work as the property of someone else.This is the most hypocritically thing I have ever seen.