Slashdot Mirror


MythTV Links Up with Program Guide Provider

Neil Campbell writes "As a long-time MythTV user, I found this announcement to be quite a surprise. A company by the name of TechnoVera has partnered with the founders of MythTV on an interesting project: A pay service for electronic program guide information rivaling that of Microsoft's Media Center. No more Zap2It surveys to continue using their free albeit basic service. The most important part of this is the fact that revenues from the service will be used to fund Open Source development; most notably MythTV. Registered Users will even have the opportunity to vote on feature enhancements that they would like to be incorporated into MythTV. I'm sure there will be some initial trepidation from the Linux community, but overall I think this should be considered progress. More attention and money for MythTV will result in a better product."

66 of 277 comments (clear)

  1. US only I am afraid by kentmartin · · Score: 5, Informative

    The company providing this stuff is LxM Suite but, unfortunately, according to their FAQ this is a US only offering.

    Damn, I would be willing to pay for a decent service in the UK. Oh well, time will tell...

    1. Re:US only I am afraid by portwojc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Damn, I would be willing to pay for a decent service in the UK. Oh well, time will tell...

      Did you really read the FAQ?

      Is LxMSuite available outside the USA?

      TV listing information is currently limited to the USA. If there is enough demand for listing information outside of North America, we can make DataDirect::TV data available to European users.


      If you brush it off and don't contact them how would they know there is Demand?

    2. Re:US only I am afraid by joschm0 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Hmmm, except for the cricket, you have the same crap on TV as here in the US.

      --
      01/20/09
    3. Re:US only I am afraid by Black+Perl · · Score: 2, Funny

      Did you really read the FAQ?

      Of course not. This is slashdot. You can assume I haven't even read the article. You'd be pushing your luck if you think I even read the summary. In fact, you shouldn't even assume I have completely read and understood the title, which of course is "MythTV links up with p0rn provider" isn't it?

      --
      bp
    4. Re:US only I am afraid by revery · · Score: 2, Funny

      I knocked up some crappy Java client a while back.

      I hope you had the decency to not bill her for those five minutes...

      --
      It' called incest Arlene, and it's against the law.

  2. Definitely a good idea. by Eric(b0mb)Dennis · · Score: 5, Insightful

    All MythTV really needed was a well-funded and backed listing system. Zap2it was a good mid-point, but not on par with Tivo's or Microsoft's offerings.

    Old (but very decent) PC hardware is getting cheaper and cheaper... (save for older ram.. but ddr is getting old too) So, for the enthusiast, MythTV just became a lot better..

    If the price is right, this could definitely work out.

    --
    Excuse me, I don't mean to impose, but I am the ocean
    1. Re:Definitely a good idea. by niiler · · Score: 2, Informative
      Announcement on MythTV WebSite:
      Support for the LxM Suite services. Basically, this is a subscription-based data-services/extras setup, with some of the money coming back towards the project in the form of development bounties. More info on the site, but, seems fairly neat to me. The initial theme that they're working on looks rather nice, too. (It's nowhere near as dark running on a TV as it appears on a monitor). I'm personally not involved with this terribly much, but one of the other major developers (Donavan Stanley) has been working really closely with them setting this up.
      I see this as a branch/fork. Based on the announcement, I'm not certain why everyone's waving flags and saying that Zap2It labs is going away. True, the other article says something along the lines of "No more Zap2It...", but if one of the major developers says that they're not involved in it much and: "If it's busted, blame him (Jarod Wilson), not me. =)", I can't see much of an issue. Those who want to keep using Zap2It can, and those who want paid for premium service can as well.
  3. Sounds good to me by Adrilla · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I personally see no downside to this, it's only 5 dollars a month, which is cheaper than the TiVo monthly fee, and that money will go right back into making the product even better, plus the 5 bucks returns a more professional scheduling service for the end user. So I see it as a win-win situation.

    --

    "Plans are for fools! Oglethorpe, the plutonian (Aqua Teen Hunger Force)
  4. Re:BUY A FREAKIN TIVO ALREADY by kentmartin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Tivo - proprietry, limited, not available (hardware and service) everywhere in the world.

    MythTV - open, flexible, can do pretty much whatever you want with it if you are willing to put in the effort, will work anywhere someone has an internet connection, and where someone (else?) is willing to provide scheduling data.

    I haven't even mentioned the geek value!

  5. obligatory (plus corny and redundant) by Adrilla · · Score: 2, Insightful

    and it runs on linux!

    --

    "Plans are for fools! Oglethorpe, the plutonian (Aqua Teen Hunger Force)
    1. Re:obligatory (plus corny and redundant) by pyrrhonist · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Uh, so does TiVo.

      --
      Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
  6. Re:BUY A FREAKIN TIVO ALREADY by dascritch · · Score: 3, Interesting

    TiVo is strictly unknow here in France. But MythTV/FreeVo & co ... users are still numerous (in proportion with the number of home linux users).

    --
    (Sorry my bad French) Je fais parler les Guignols de l'Info. Le pied, quoi.
  7. Doomed to fail. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    1. It costs money.
    2. It is a subscription.
    3. Only MythTV users will use this.

    As far as I know, there are no retail systems based on MthyTV that would provide this service in some kind of nice package like Tivo or something. So there is no market presence (yet). So they have to rely on GNU/Linux nerds for income. This is a big problem. GNU/Linux nerds are notoriously cheap. And they hate subscriptions. Failure is immenent, I'm afraid.

    1. Re:Doomed to fail. by Scyber · · Score: 2, Interesting

      One advantage this has over TiVo's model is that they have no hardware costs (nor related hardware R&D costs) for the product. Which means they probably need a much, much lower subscriber base to cover their costs. Although, I wouldn't be surprised to start seeing them putting together some pre-fabricated MythTV boxes for the masses.

    2. Re:Doomed to fail. by Belial6 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The cost may be even less when compared to Tivo than many realize. If I am not mistaken Tivo and ReplayTV both charge their fee per unit. If this is $5 a month, can work with multiple machines in a household, instead of $60 a month for 4 tuners, it would be $5.

    3. Re:Doomed to fail. by Robert+The+Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There was at least 1 Purduced and it ran into problems with of all things guide data. Data Direct does have a policy about commerical use that means that if I take and build a myth box and sell it to you and provide support for you then you can't use there free data. If I wanted to start selling myth boxes with 1 Year support I would be talking to the copy about rebranding there service as part of my hardware sales and maybe put 1 Year of data servers into the program. After 1 Year I no longer server the equipment they can renew the service agree with me and get another year or switch to a free data service but at that point I believe it wouldn't break datadirect server requirements no support anymore from a comerical company. This looks like a 1st step to being able to sell commerical version of myth inside the us.

  8. Nice but Myth needed improvement in other places by Amgine007 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    All MythTV really needed was a well-funded and backed listing system. Zap2it was a good mid-point, but not on par with Tivo's or Microsoft's offerings.

    Gotta disagree. Myth is nice but is still FAR lacking in many ways - UI and ease of development in particular (speaking from some experience).

    The UI alone is a mess; examples: menus for eg setup descend and descend with zero context; similar settings stored all over the palce (see commercial flagging and transcoding); recordings organized by show but then loop endlessly; general ugliness (skins can only do so much).

    Fix it yourself? See my second gripe.

    I like Myth, but it has many warts, and missing program guide data is not one of them. ymmv.

  9. More attention and money for MythTV will result in by Caspian · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "More attention and money for MythTV will result in a better product."

    ...and lawsuits from the MPAA, etc. ;)

    --
    With spending like this, exactly what are "conservatives" conserving?
  10. What is wrong with the UK Radio Times grabber by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Not trolling, but I'm just wondering what is wrong with the existing UK RT grabber?

    I'm using this quite happily (it was a pain to set up I must admit, but now its working, I have no gripes).

    Personally, even if a UK pay service became available, I'd stick with the free RT service, as it's fine for what I need.

    1. Re:What is wrong with the UK Radio Times grabber by Madgett · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I use the RT grabber too and agree it's great value for money, being free and all. However it does have its flaws. It often doesn't contain episode names and numbers (making it hard for favourites to record just one copy of each episode), it doesn't use the "first showing" flag properly, etc. Basically it's fine for a barebones service but a pay-for service could contain much cleaner & better data.

      I'd pay for a reasonably-priced UK service, just for the semi-guarantee that it's there to stay if nothing else. RT's feed has gone dead for several days at a time & you never quite know whether it's gone for good.

      I should point out don't use MythTV; I use SageTV on Windows (ok now throw the rotten eggs). In my defence I do grab & parse from my Linux box...

  11. No problem with service but $5 a month is too high by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Thats $60 per year. This seems a high number
    considering Yahoo music service is at $5 / month.
    I think $12 per year would be more reasonable,
    also considering free alternatives exists (although
    they might not work as well).

  12. Radio Times by orv · · Score: 5, Informative

    Why do you need a commercial service in the UK? The Radio Times provides an excellent free listings service for mythtv.

  13. Media Center Program Guide by AaronBrethorst · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You know, I don't pay anything for my Media Center program guide. It's just there, and just works. And clearly this could be taken as astroturfing (just look at my sig), but it's not. I use Media Center because it's cool and it works, not because my employer told me to (or anything equally silly). That said, I think it's really cool that MythTV will be getting a more fully featured program guide.

    --
    No, but I used to work for Microsoft.
    1. Re:Media Center Program Guide by samael · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I had always wondered how Media Center pays for their program guide data. I assume that Microsoft is paying for it and then writing it off against the cost of the software. If it costs them (say) £2 a user a month then so long as people upgrade once every two years then they'll still be well in profit.

    2. Re:Media Center Program Guide by geckofiend · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I use Media Center because it's cool and it works

      Which is pretty much why I use MythTV. Oh and the fact that I can do what I want with my media, and I can watch HDTV using a Celeron 2.5ghz instead of a P4 3ghz with HT, and I don't have to pay $1200 for a Myth machine the list goes on and on...

      That said, I think it's really cool that MythTV will be getting a more fully featured program guide.

      Yeah I'd say you're astroturfing. Myth has had the exact same data data as MCE for free for quite some time now.

  14. You should be aware... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    That programming guide information is sent over both cable and terrestrial broadcast systems.

    If you pay for what is already being sent into your house for free, what does that say about you?

    "I can't code?"

    Look at http://www.atsc.org/ for free specs.

    1. Re:You should be aware... by geckofiend · · Score: 2, Informative
      That programming guide information is sent over both cable and terrestrial broadcast systems.

      If you pay for what is already being sent into your house for free, what does that say about you?

      That guide information you speak of doesn't even come close to providing enough info to reliable schedule recordings let alone provide all of the other usefull information for bells and whistles like new eiposde only recording, or looking up shows to watch by genre etc.

      Oh and even if the crappy data was enough for you, it's not available for huge segments of the US.

    2. Re:You should be aware... by 93+Escort+Wagon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That programming guide information is sent over both cable and terrestrial broadcast systems.

      If you pay for what is already being sent into your house for free, what does that say about you?

      "I can't code?"


      How about "I have a life"?

      --
      #DeleteChrome
  15. Re:Nice but Myth needed improvement in other place by FireFury03 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Gotta disagree. Myth is nice but is still FAR lacking in many ways - UI and ease of development in particular (speaking from some experience).

    I find Myth pretty feature-rich, and it certainly seems to screw up and forget to record stuff less frequently than the Sky+ boxes some of my friends have.

    You might be right about the UI to some extant - it's mostly ok for the techie but probably not so suitable for the general public (but then are the general public going to build their own Myth box or just buy one of the commercial PVRs?).

    I think the main problem with the UI from my point of view is the recording priorities stuff - I don't like having to juggle integer priorities for all my programs and would prefer to just see a list of shows ordered by priority and be able to move a show up and down the list.

    There is also some inconsistency with key bindings too - most of the UI looks in the key bindings database to find out which key is "select", whcih is "play", etc. However, some parts of the UI make assumptions instead - i.e. expecting Enter to be "select". But that's reasonably minor and probably doesn't affect most people.

    I've not really done any UI development for Myth (just added a few controls to some of the setup screens...), although I did write some of the back end code (A/V synchronisation routines, etc) and can't say it was that hard to implement, despite not really being a C++ coder - I usually just use C so there was a slight learning curve there.

    I like Myth, but it has many warts, and missing program guide data is not one of them.

    I use the RadioTimes listings and I have to say that everything has got a *lot* better since RT started providing machine readable listings - the site scraper used to take hours and every so often they'd change something that broke it. There is still the occasional problem that programmes which are rerun several times during the 2 week period you get listings for sometimes don't have matching descriptions or subtitles so you get 2 recordings but for the most part it's not bad. Of course I'd like radio listings too (used to get them from the scraper but they don't provide machine readable radio listings).

  16. Excellent news by shrewtamer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's great for mythtv to have this potential revenue source. I hope it works out. It is a shame the service isn't available more widely around the world, but there are many methods to fill your myth database. Hopefully though this new system will do well and extend to other parts of the world. It needn't be expensive to run or to subscribe to, yet the volume of subscribers has potential to pay for a lot of development effort.

    I've just got my first mythtv system working 2 days ago and I'm happy as larry. The advert detection is working very well. Being able to pause a live show is great. The program guide and recording scheduling functionalitys make choosing what you want to watch easy. I find its best to record stuff you want to watch because the advert detection is so good. It is possible to do advert detection during recording. There are performance constraints of course. Another nice function is slowing down or speeding up playback without altering the pitch of the audio. When you watch Attack of the Clones you can speed up through some of the crappy stilted dialogue and slow down in some of the excellent action scenes!

    It's a bit of a bitch to setup the whole system and it does take quite a lot of hardware resource but the results are so good that I really think this thing is going to attract a wider and wider audience. It's not just the TV....various plugins provide gaming, music, weather information, news, dvd playing, movie playing, photo viewing and importing. Altogether it makes an excellent entertainment centre in any living room.

    I have an Athlon-XP 2.4 with 640Mb RAM, a generic SAA7134 (LifeView 3000) tuner which does no hardware mpeg encoding. Its got an Nvidia GeForce FX5500 graphics card with a Tv-out connected to my ...TV! I'm using an old style terrestrial broadcast system and I have to deal with some signal noise - so I have a deinterlacer and a denoiser in my playback filter chain - this adds to the processor load. It's too much for the system to be able to simmultaneously record a showing and playback (current or previously recorded) showing without dropping frames on the playback. I think I might need a tuner card with hardware encoding. First I'll look at throwing in more RAM or faster hard drive setup if appropriate. You can have multiple backends and multiple frontends. Also more than one tuner card in the same backend. I'd really like to keep it all in the box under the tellie though, with the laptop as an occasional frontend.

    1. Re:Excellent news by spagetti_code · · Score: 4, Informative

      Get a tuner card first - especially something like PVR-350 that can encode TV to MPEG and simultaneously decode MPEGS to S-video/composite for playback.

      My 1.2GHz machine uses 10-15% CPU encoding/recording one channel and, at the same time, playing something previously recorded at 1366x768 (with ads removed of course :-)

      Also, unless you have done some significant work around dealing with heat, you have a pretty noisy machine in your living room. Ick.

      If anyone starts this type of project, get a low spec and very quiet machine, such as one based on an EPIA MII10000 (1.0GHz) or fanless Eden600. Add a PVR-350 and a *quiet*/fast/big disk (I have 550GB), and you are away.

      Oh, and use KnoppMyth for a quick and painless install.

    2. Re:Excellent news by Glitch010101 · · Score: 2, Informative

      A few rebuttals:
      MythTV is packaged just like many of our favorite complex programs. KDE is a bitch to set up, but it's pretty easy to do "apt-get install kde"

      Similarly, atrpms and others package MythTV for easy installation.

      Installing MythTV is a 5 step process from bare hardware.

      0.) put together an old box (I'm using an Athlon 1.4ghz in my recording box and and a Via M10000 in my playback-only box) and a cheap tuner card. The Hauppauge WinTV-D series for around $40 on ebay works great. The WinTV PVR's will work even better because they offload encoding from the machine, but they're not neccessary.

      1.) Install Fedora Core (any version)

      2.) Install the atrpms kickstart package

      3.) apt-get update

      4.) apt-get dist-upgrade

      5.) apt-get install mythtv-suite

      Voila, you've got a working MythTV install. The setup program will walk you through initial tasks like choosing a provider for XML tv listings.

      To address the problems you're having with your machine, a few possibilities are:

      * You're encoding at too high a resolution. - NTSC tv really tops out at 480x480. Using more pixels provides diminishing returns.

      * You're encoding with too intense a codec - RTJpeg is great for low-processor encoding. That said, I'm using MPEG 4 at 480x480, 2400 bitrate for both live and recorded TV. This is on a 1.4ghz, and I've never seen a dropped frame.

      * You may not have the proper video driver installed for X. I honestly don't know how the default drivers are for NVidia cards, but I know you can get a kick ass driver from *gasp* the vendor for most distros. I had this problem with my VIA chipset until the opensource unichrome via drivers became part of the X.org package. The default VESA driver just couldn't keep up with playback.

      * You may not have DMA enabled on your hard drive, making it choke on simultaneous playback and recording, especially if using a low-compression or high-resolution (read: big files) codec.

      * 640mb ram is overkill. I've got one 256 meg chip in my machine. It can't hurt to have more, but don't throw more ram at it.

      * The denoiser may be part of your problem - but the deinterlacer works just fine for me. The noisy signal *may* be what is causing your jumpy recording, as the encoder has to treat each new frame as a whole new scene, due to so many pixels changing, but I'd be suprised if that alone could cause a 2.4ghz to frame-skip.

      Hope some of that helps!

  17. Re:Nice but Myth needed improvement in other place by FireFury03 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Oh yes, I know I shouldn't reply to myself but a point I missed:

    There are no CAMs available for decoding Sky channels, so you have to use a normal Sky box to decode to analogue and then reencode to MPEG4 instead of just using a DVB-S card to suck the MPEG2 data straight off the satellite dish. This sucks but I don't think Ofcom (or whoever) is likely to force Sky to sell a CAM, which gives Sky+ a bit of an advantage. :(

  18. OT, but I can't resist by rsilvergun · · Score: 2

    What's a good, cheap card for Myth TV. Neweggs got tons of cards under $80 bucks, so many it's hard to decide. I'm looking to replace my aging STB bt848 base card (it's got these weird wavey blue bars in the picture that're driving me nuts, doesn't show up in capture though, go fig).

    --
    Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    1. Re:OT, but I can't resist by jeffkinney · · Score: 4, Informative

      The PVR-250 or PVR-350 are good choices if you want to use KnobbMyth or follow the Fedora Myth How To.

      The PVR-150 is a good single tuner card, or even better, the PVR-500. The 500 is detected as two 150s (so you can record two programs simultaneously), takes up only one slot, and splits the coax input internally.

      However, the 150 and 500 cards are supported only under the IVTV development branch (0.3.4). Although very stable, the driver is changing daily and requires more effort when compared to Fedora MythTV or KnobbMyth.

    2. Re:OT, but I can't resist by Alizarin+Erythrosin · · Score: 2, Informative

      I run a Hauppauge PVR-350 in my box. It runs in a PIII 500 with 386mb ram and the processor is hardly ever even touched. Hardware encoding and decoding are done on the card itself. It's somewhat expensive (about $180 depending on where you get it), but if you have old hardware it's worth it to not have to build something with more power (although that is fun too).

      I'll also be adding a PVR-250 (hardware encoding only) to my backend system as a second tuner eventually.

      --
      There are only 10 kinds of people in this world... those who understand binary and those who don't
  19. UK programme guide by gilesjuk · · Score: 2, Informative

    As long as this doesn't affect the XMLTV module I use for the UK. This grabs XML data from the Radio Times website (they provided the raw XML files as a goodwill gesture), it gives me about 2 weeks of data and enhances my TV viewing no end as I need not miss anything.

  20. Just signed up... by BoldAndBusted · · Score: 5, Informative

    ...and I don't like how I have to painstakingly re-enter my lineup (uncheck, uncheck, uncheck, uncheck), when it would be sooo much easier if I could just import my existing Zap2it lineup. But, I want to vote on new features - we'll see how this pans out. Only $30 for the six month pilot, not too much of a pain in the wallet for what we might get. Oh, and I'd really love to see the lineups tailored to individual subscription packages - THAT would makes keeping up with your sat/cable provider's constant lineup changes a bit less of a chore. We'll see if paying for it really gets you any more say...

    Been using Myth since 0.15 in August, '04. With a PVR-350 in a Shuttle SN41G2 V2 box and 2x200GB LVM'd drives. Having a PVR really helped me to get the most out of my Dish subscription - hard to believe how cool it is to be able to record all those research and university networks in a managed way - you can take entire courses this way. And watching "Mosaic: News from the Middle East" has been an education.

  21. Re:Still an option? by numark · · Score: 5, Informative

    No, the zap2it support still exists in MythTV. The new listing service even says in their FAQ that their service will only be one of many options, including XMLTV and zap2it, for finding TV listings. Their goal is just to sell a more complete set of listings that "just works," contributes money back to MythTV, and has an eye toward continued development based on what subscribers request.

    --
    Want Slashdot headlines on your site? Try SlashHead
  22. There is a HUGE opportunity here... by Cap'n+Crax · · Score: 5, Insightful

    For someone to start a company building and selling MythTV boxes. Put a large hard drive in it, DVD burner, etc... Ideally it would be region free, HDTV capable, PVR features, able to play DVD/CD/MP3/VCD/SVCD/JPG/etc... You could rip DVDs and CDs, store your music library, use as a WebTV, and so on. It would replace your CD player, your VCR, your DVD player, your Stereo (with a radio card). It would be the one-for-all media box.

    If someone started selling these pre-made and ready to go, I'll be the first to buy. Of course, I could probably build one, but I KNOW the market is there to buy them if somebody steps up to the plate.

    --
    PK: 09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0
    1. Re:There is a HUGE opportunity here... by Alibloke · · Score: 3, Insightful
      In my experience with MythTV so far it's no where near as stable as it needs to be to sell to the mass market. I'm still getting problems when fast forwarding and rewinding live TV.

      Don't get me wrong I LOVE MythTV, I just don't think my dad or average Joe could handle it's quirky nature just yet.

  23. Mac mini by MagerValp · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Great, now all we need is a full port to MacOS X. The Mac mini is small, silent, and good looking - it's almost a perfect HTPC platform, only lacking on the software side. I'm currently using it with MPlayer, iTunes, an ATI remote, but a real media frontend would make it much more grandma friendly.

    Is anyone else here using a mini as a HTPC? What does your setup look like?

    --

    READY.
    #
    1. Re:Mac mini by xmodem_and_rommon · · Score: 4, Interesting

      When I move out, I will buy me a mac mini for use as a HTPC.

      Have a look at CenterStage

      CenterStage is on open source project to build a powerful and intuitive media center application for the Apple Macintosh, this project was inspired by the launch of the Mac mini, an ideal Mac to use as part of a home theatre system.

    2. Re:Mac mini by Ath · · Score: 2, Informative
      The MythTV frontend has been available for Mac OS X since the 0.17 release, which is from February 11, 2005.

      Of course, you said full port so I assume you also mean the backend. That would require two things. First, a video input (which the Mac mini may have, I just do not know). Second, the encoding would have to be handled via software as I do not think there is any encoding hardware in the mini.

      From a form factor standpoint, it is perfect.

    3. Re:Mac mini by EnglishDude · · Score: 2, Informative

      I do, although using OSX and the frontend port only - the Mac Mini, IMO wouldn't be up to the task of being both the frontend/backend due to not having an encoder, video in etc - you can use an external tuner true, but still. I have an backend on an mini-ITX motherboard somewhere in the house, and the Mac Mini connects to that.

  24. Re:TV downsides by jamp · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I actually watch far less TV since setting up my Myth system last August. Even my wife watches less TV now.

    I just record everything we might like to watch, rather than watching any old crap thats on. And no time wasted watching adverts.

  25. Buy it here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://mythic.tv/ sells exactly that in their Dragon box. They also sell everything you need to just slot together a box to your specs, and pledge that everything will work out of the box with KnoppMyth. The guys who run the site are very active in supporting the MythTV community, and have been doing it for a while.

  26. Re:No problem with service but $5 a month is too h by BurntNickel · · Score: 3, Insightful

    although they might not work as well

    Exactly the reson why $5 a month sounds very reasonable.

    --
    And the knowledge that they fear is a weapon to be used against them...
  27. What is different? by killeena · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Besides not filling out surveys and having local movie times, there doesn't seem to be much difference between this and Zap2it. I can live with filling out an occasional survey and going to my computer to look up movie times. Maybe when the service offers more, I will think about it.

    --
    Freedom would be not to choose between black and white but to abjure such prescribed choices. -Theodor Adorno
  28. Re:As long as they don't remove the free EPGs... by kslater · · Score: 2, Interesting

    can you post a link to some folks that are working on this? I'd chip in if I knew more.

  29. Re:KnoppMyth vs Gentoo Myth by toad3k · · Score: 2, Informative

    I never tried the knoppmyth, but gentoo myth was a sinch to setup. I had more problems with card drivers than anything. Also works on amd64.

    As for that guy who was having dropped frames, he could probably get rid of them if he removed a filter or disabled the commercial detection.

    I found that the commercial detection added about 20% cpu usage on my amd64 3400+, the deinterlacer added about 10%. As it stands with both commercial, deinterlacing, recording, encoding to mpeg4 and playing back a recording, I use almost 60% cpu, which means I can emerge my system or do pretty much anything else in the background without any problems.

  30. yeah right by winse · · Score: 2, Interesting

    like ppl (average reader here) are going to pay for a decent service when they can get a crap free one. Not to troll, but most people here use free stuff ( as in beer ) over comercial stuff even if the free stuff happens to be substantially sucky. I just don't see it. I do love my MythTv though.

    --
    this sig is deprecated
  31. Wow all the cost of Tivo and a pain in the ass too by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Funny
    Finally, a product that offers me both the monthly fee of Tivo and the general pain in the ass of setting up MythTV. How could it fail?

    -Eric

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  32. Re:Nice but Myth needed improvement in other place by FireFury03 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The thing that frustrates me more than anything else is that there's no excuse for this, except for the choices made by the project leader.

    I don't think this is down to a choice my Isaac but simply down to the ad-hoc nature with which FOSS projects such as Myth are developed. Different bits come from different people and so consistency can be limited. What they actually need is a "UI guru" or a organised team of UI people to sanitise the UI and new elements as they are implemented, however that involves interested parties to have time to do that sort of thing and many (techies) perceive the UI as somewhat secondary to the "cool stuff" (I am often no different with projects I'm working on, preferring to play with cool new stuff instead of boring sanitisation of other people's work).

    There's a lot to be read into the fact that users will now be able to vote on which features should be prioritized for development.

    I must make a very important point here that many people (users) just don't get: with FOSS software, everyone developing it is freely putting their time into the project and getting nothing in return except the features they are implementing. This means that in general, developers working on a FOSS project will only implement features that they themselves want. So basically, if you want something doing then you may well have to do it yourself, you certainly shouldn't expect someone else to give up their time to do it.

    Commercial projects, OTOH, are not bound by such problems and so a developer may well develop a feature you want. However, this only works to a point - larger companies (i.e. those who don't significantly benefit from a minority group buying a product) are unlikely to implement features for individual users and in many cases get too much input from the marketting people who want "cool" stuff people are never going to use or want to rip out functionality on the grounds that it "overcomplicates" it. When was the last time Microsoft implemented a feature you asked for? :)

    I think there may well be an advantage in FOSS projects which have commercial backing so long as the commercial side doesn't have _too much_ influence over the featureset, etc (Asterisk seems to be a good example of an FOSS project with commercial backing)

  33. Re:BUY A FREAKIN TIVO ALREADY by elrous0 · · Score: 2, Informative
    However, space is so much more expensive then on a pc

    Tivo's can be upgraded for the cost of a hard drive. First thing I did when I got my Tivo was drop two 120 GB drives into it. Yes, it does void the warranty. But MythTV doesn't have a warranty either.

    -Eric

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  34. Re:$5/month adds up. Is it worth it? by Funnky · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I burn 2-4 candy bars a session when I'm coding, and countless cans of DP. If I told you that by giving two candy bars a week to MythTV, we could polish it into the true omniscient media solution that we all want, would you do it? That is the cost. In exchange we get a company that, unlike most, puts money back into open source, hates MS, and worked with the devs instead of hijacking the app for their own commercial gain! These guys are willing to pay for something they could have gotten for free and make it better for all of us!!!! They were the first to pay for something that they could have gotten for free, and now they are offering a solution that benefits us and we all throw stones and ask for a discount! I'll bet they could offer it for $30.00 a year if they keep all of the money for themselves instead of funding open source development, is that what you guys want????

    --
    Where are the JetCars and Teflon Suits I was promised??
  35. But... by mapmaker · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If I wanted to pay a monthly fee for PVR service, I wouldn't have built a MythTV box - I would have bought a Tivo.

  36. Slight correction by Frying+Ferret · · Score: 2, Informative

    The article states: the guys at MythTV seem to have responded well, posting a rare interim release (MythTV 0.18.1) to avail all its users of the new functionality. This isn't quite true, the 0.18.1 branch was an undertaking by the myth developers to have a stable branch of myth with fixes backported to it from CVS, it wasn't created just to enable LxMSuite, although LxMSuite was incorperated into it.

  37. Re:KnoppMyth vs Gentoo Myth by cesman · · Score: 3, Informative

    IMHO, there is no comparision. Simply put, KnoppMyth is the easiest and quickest method to get a MythTV based set-top box up and running. Of course, I am biased as I started KnoppMyth. KnoppMyth offers "out the box" support for the Hauppauge PVR 2/350, pcHDTV 2/3000 and the Air2PC. Once you have a backend running, you can even use the CD as a frontend! We also include, MPlayer, Xine, NFS, Samba, CyberMediaGate (uPnP server) and much, much more.

    Kind regards,

    Cecil

    --
    When the source is open, the possibilities are endless.
  38. Canadian Listing's by chilimonkey · · Score: 4, Informative

    In their FAQ they state :

    Is LxMSuite available outside the USA?

    TV listing information is currently limited to the USA. If there is enough demand for listing information outside of North America, we can make DataDirect::TV data available to European users.


    Since I live in Canada, which is in North America, I was wondering if the listing would be available here. So I emailed their support and here's their response :

    There was a last minute contract snafu that led to support for Canada being dropped at launch. Canadian listings should be available via LxMSuite very soon.

    Thanks,

    LxMSuite Support


    Just an FYI for us Canadian's :)

  39. Endangering the freeness of Zap2It? by Dachannien · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Having a company start charging $5 per month for the same service Zap2It provides only serves to encourage Zap2It to begin charging real-life cash for their service as well. And in the end, that means fewer choices, not more.

  40. Re:No excuse at all. by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 2, Funny

    I look at it this way: If the original developer had DONE IT RIGHT in the first place, nobody would have to go through and re-write it now. If there's a configuration file that tells which keys are mapped to which functions (going by previous posts on this thread), then why isn't it used consistantly by EVERY screen?

    It's great that OSS lets people fix things like this, but it should also let people slap bad programmers in the face. "You put in this menu and didn't use the right key binding, slap! No cookie."

  41. Re:Nice but Myth needed improvement in other place by xcomputer_man · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think MythTV badly needs an Edje UI. That would be a match made in heaven.

    (For those unfamiliar with Edje, it is the UI library used in E17 and EFL-based applications like Entrance.)

  42. Re:No excuse at all. by LWATCDR · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "It's great that OSS lets people fix things like this, but it should also let people slap bad programmers in the face. "You put in this menu and didn't use the right key binding, slap! No cookie.""
    Hey you get what you pay for. He wrote it for himself so he must like it.
    If you do not like it.
    1. Help him make it better.
    2. Don't use it.
    3. PAY him to make the change.
    That is what gets me. You never gave him a cookie you are a free loader. If you do not like you have no right to do anything.
    I had a problem with KDevelop. It is hard to figure out how to get a project to link with external libraries. I posted that it was harder than Ajunta. KDevelop is a great IDE for people not doing things like FLTK development. For KDE, QT and GTK it is wonderful. But I have no right to slap them because it does not work the way I want it to.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  43. Re:MCE vs. MythTV by jarodwilson · · Score: 2, Informative

    First off, the problem with the AIW cards is that they have broken, half-implemented Linux drivers, its not MythTV's fault.

    And yes, there have been TONS of improvements over the course of the past year, its definitely worth revisiting, but not with an AIW.

    --
    Jarod Wilson, Mythaholic
  44. Perhaps Myth could use some alternative frontends by Amgine007 · · Score: 2, Informative

    I think MythTV badly needs an Edje UI. That would be a match made in heaven.

    You bring up an interesting point. Here and elsewhere, I haven't really seen anyone defend Myth's UI. Based on replies it looks like improving some of the UI is a priority for the next release. But as we can see, users (and developers willing to spend time) have different preferences.

    The real interesting thing is that a while back Myth split the 'front end' and 'back end' into distinct components. I believe the driving motivation was to decouple the backend from the playing unit, such that there could be multiple back ends and multiple players. What would be a great extension of this would be to see an alternate front end to the stock one. Say one written in a different language or with a different playback mechanism.

    The impression I get is that the separation of these two components is not quite there yet. For example, I recently ran a 0.17 frontend with an 0.18 backend, and as a result the new front end was no longer usable (extra columns in the DB). At the very least, it is possible for these components to trample on each other. An API written to expect homogenous frontends (and not just THE Myth frontend) might help here.

    cheers..