Ballmer Reflects on Xbox Launch Errors
Steve Ballmer, cheerleader for all things Microsoft, was candid and reflective during the first official day of the expo. Gamespot has coverage of the one hour rap session he held with journalists, discussing game demos, the positioning of the 360, and their rivalry with Sony. From the article: "He voluntarily reflected on the poor pre-release showing the company gave the first-gen Xbox, calling those early demos 'a disaster.' Threaded through his comments in the freeform discussion were constant references to what the company must do to better its performance in the console wars with the Xbox 360." Update: 05/18 21:31 GMT by Z : Helps if I actually link to the article, huh? Interview with Ballmer up on Engadget, as well.
Links?
that this one is "much more innovative and much better than anything before"?
I mean, isn't this Microsoft is telling in the last 15 years?
It takes a man to suffer ignorance and smile
Be yourself no matter what they say
Article.
Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
Article is here:
4 22.html
http://www.gamespot.com/news/2005/05/18/news_6125
Just in case anyone wanted to actually RTFA . . .
4 22.html
http://www.gamespot.com/news/2005/05/18/news_6125
The article is very short on ANYTHING.
On a side note, why can't I ever get the demos. When the PS shipped, it came with a demo disc of techincal demos that I thought was great. We see all these cool demos that the PS2, PS3, X-Box, X-Box 360, GC and such can do, but why don't they put those on a disc and include it with the hardware just as a way of saying "see, this is what it can do" to the consumer, as a way of showing off. They already developed them, why not give 'em away.
Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
...we've done a much better job at leaking secrets and hints this time around!
One man's Funny is another man's Offtopic.
That might explain this.
Here's a tidbit, but you should read the whole thing:
Microsoft had brought its own supporters along with them, just in case they got a chilly reception at the press conference!
Commenting on the ease that game pirates can mod the Xbox, the execs agreed that "with the Xbox, it was too easy [to mod]. In the next generation, we want t o figure it out so even if they figure it out, it won't make economic sense."
Ruh roh.
The unveiling was totally anti-climactic yet they showed close-ups of people with their mouths open... Any gamer worth their weight in salt knows the only thing that matters are the games...
and remember kids, we *love* the XBox classic and will continue to support it wholeheartedly. Just like Windows ME!
Actually, MS has no say in whether the XBox is 'supported' or not... The game and peripheral makers do.
The unveiling was totally anti-climactic yet they showed close-ups of people with their mouths open...
Wow, I'm not really sure if that's appropriate here...take your pr0n talk elsewhere!
One man's Funny is another man's Offtopic.
Actually, MS has no say in whether the XBox is 'supported' or not... The game and peripheral makers do.
I'm fairly certain most/all console makers have an approval process for games. They can stop the flow of games if they so desire (though why would they). Peripherals, now that's a different story.
http://www.engadget.com/entry/1234000597043723/
* Snippet *
Bach: Just to give you a specific example, wouldn't it be cool to have the game that has the person on the PC being the general who is driving the strategy and the person on the console on Xbox Live executing the strategy. That is a completely new genre, not sure what you would call it, but that's a completely different experience, and it leverages everything that steve talked about that we're putting in place. That's the kind of thinking that we're going to get people to, whether it's first party or third party.
Look past the gaming aspects of the console, how does the Xbox 360 serve as Microsoft's beachhead into the living room. A 20GB hard drive isn't a lot of space for storage, but since it does have this broadband connection, how is it going to integrated with IPTV, streaming video, and streaming audio?
Three things: Number one, who knows what configurations will be there by the time we're done. I think that's important to say. Number two, because you do have the network connectivity, whether you have a Media Center PC or not. You can put an awfully big hard disk on a regular PC and plug into this ecosystem, we have plenty of extensibility in terms of storage. And then number three, you take the IP TV work we're doing, and that technology can run on a PC, on a set top box, it can run on an Xbox. So there will be, in conjunction with the work we do with the video delivery companies, particularly the telcos, who have tended to be our strongest customers for our IPTV stuff, there will be yet another way to acquire and use video content. So you have set tops, you have the set top experience, you have the Xbox, you've got a big hard disk, you've got networked to the PC in the home, so I think there will be a lot of ways to get that media onto the Xbox.
Not. Enough. Deodorant.
"I want to make a lot of money, but the right way," said Ballmer." I don't even know where to begin with this.
I doubt MS cares
Plus, that was a launch title!
"[previous product] sucked - I don't know why anyone used it... I'm ashamed of it... but [new product] is the pinacle of excellence and you'd be a retard to still use [old product] while [new product] is available for only [everything in your wallet, your favourite shirt and your new kitten]."
BlackNova Traders
Right, MS have a long and illustrious track record of self-deprecation--as long as it relates to the PAST and not something that is a current potential money maker. BG has no problem saying "didn't I look silly in that hat", but he will never in a million years say "gosh, that WMP10 GUI sure is one ugly bugger!"
*Ballmer jumps around *
"Errors Errors Errors Errors Errors Errors Errors -
Developers Developers Developers Developers Developers "
The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
What is this disaster you speak of?
"hey we thought they were releasing ps3 THIS year, but now they are saying next year and their CPU is faster than ours. well.. let me see what we can do"
Any bets on xbox 360 getting delayed 'til next year?
Go ahead MOD my day!
More opinions here
I don't know exactly what he's talking about, but after seeing the screenshots/specs from the PS3 demo, if I was MS, I would give up now.
"A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
AFAIK, those shots didn't come from a PS3 console, they were CG. If they ARE for real, more power to them. I'm withholding judgement until the console itself produces them.
You mean the same pre-rendered stuff and rubby ducky demo (which saw when the PS2 got announced), where none of the games ever came close to looking like that? Don't get me wrong, I watched all of it, and it got me excited in a 'what-if!?!?' sort of way, but I'm not stupid enough to think the actual Killzone 2 would ever look anywhere near what they showed in the CGI movie. God forbid Microsoft actually focus on showing actual games, that will actually be playable at the show and released in the fall, and people rag on them for it by comparing them to the pre-rendered CGI footage and tech demos from the PS3.
"Oh Noes! Sony's CGI was prettier than our CGI! Cancel everything!"
I have a lot of opinions about Cyborgs and Architects
"Prerrendered, prerrendered , prerrendered, prerrendered" Tech demos too. Xbox has nothing to worry about, PS3 is going to be great some day but right now, there arent playable games for it. (and Im begining to wonder is there are going to be enough for next year) those shown were either tech demos or prerrendered.
Go ahead MOD my day!
More opinions here
I can't load the site you link for some reason, but I was simply pointing out that they COULD EOL the console in terms of game releases - if they so desired. When you said "they don't have a say", you were incorrect. They do indeed have a say, at least in terms of games.
Reporter: Is the new xbox called xbox 360
Ballmer: Yes
Reporter: Do you think it will top PS3
Ballmer: Yes
Reporter: Is Bill Gates still the CEO
Ballmer: Yes
Reporter: Do you enjoy taking it up the ass
Ballmer: Yes, I mean.... I am a very busy marketer.
It's just a review of Kabuki Warriors, possibly the worst game ever.
You're right that they could prevent game houses from developing for the xbox, but I challenge you to come up with a good reason why they would do it. The only thing I can think of is to 'kill' the xbox, something which would only garner bad publicity. Why buy the next console from them if they will eventually prevent new games being released for it? I guess its pretty much a longshot argument in either direction.
And you are saying that the Xbox ones weren't? Well... if they were they wouldnt have looked so crappy ;)
Go ahead MOD my day!
More opinions here
Lies?
It's pretty clear that Sony has the advantage with the brand, and that the PS3 *will* be more powerful than the Xbox 360, but the Killzone 2 demo *was* prerendered. I don't see that as spreading lies.
Microsoft has a bit of a say. New developers aren't going to be able to get dev kits from a company that doesn't support the hardware. Old developers may not be able to renew the necessary licenses. I'm not sure about that one though.
"Think you can take me? Go ahead on. It's your move." --Joe Don Baker in Final Justice
This doesn't make sense to me. Aren't games their main source of revenue when it comes to the Xbox? Why would they care if people decide to mod their Xbox, as long as they still buy games? IMHO, the Xbox would be more valuable to the consumer if it could be modified in any way they see fit, but this is MS we're talking about... Oh well.
"Feel a glory in so rolling / on the human heart a stone" --E. A. Poe, "The Bells"
It was said that the Unreal engine shots were in realtime. That's good enough for me.
"A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
but he will never in a million years say "gosh, that WMP10 GUI sure is one ugly bugger!"
:)
Sure he will...when WMP11 is released.
As I said in my original comment... "They can stop the flow of games if they so desire (though why would they)."
"So Ballmer, what's the most important thing we need to make sure the 360 is as successful as it can be?"
"Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers!"
"So we need companies that can develop good games?"
"Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers!"
"Well said."
"When the atomic bomb goes off there's devastation...but when the atomic bong goes off there's celebraaaaation!"
Yep, it's official. They only give mod points to those with an IQ less than 60.
If you've got a definitive source for that, I'd love to see it.
Yes, some stuff was definitely rendered in realtime. Fight Night was for example, as was the Final Fantasy VII demo and I-8. However, there was a definite difference in quality between those titles and some of the others like Killzone 2. Now don't get me wrong, I'm sure Killzone 2 will look lovely, but just not quite that lovely.