Slashdot Mirror


Steve Jobs In Praise of Dropping Out

atlacatl writes "Wired reports on Steve Jobs giving a graduation speech: 'Jobs, 50, said he attended Reed College in Portland, Oregon but dropped out after only eight months because it was too expensive for his working-class family. He said his real education started when he "dropped in" on whatever classes interested him -- including calligraphy.' The irony: that most students were graduating. I wouldn't invite him for a high school graduation. Imagine all the 'hard' work teachers, parents and guidance counselors put into brainwashing every kid that he/she must go to University." (Jobs was speaking to the graduates at Stanford University.)

68 of 1,014 comments (clear)

  1. Avoid ask.slashdot for a few days... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ug... Job's touting dropping out will undoubtedly start a flurry of "ask.slashdot" questions similar to:
    Posted by Michael in an alternate universe
    from the Still-in-the-parents-basement dept.

    hey d00dz, i wanna drop out like Steve Jobs did! i also wanna leet sysadmin job. i aint got no skoolin' or relevant experience. the job has to let me wear my floorscent green hair down to my ass and let me show my 130 tattoos. and don't forget the piercings in my eyebrows, nose, lips, tongue, septum and 2" holes in the ears. and it has to pay $100K a year or i aint geting outta bed and i'm 2 leet to start at the bottom and work my way up because I AM UNIQE!
    The world owes me a living! so what do u /.ers do?
    Thanks, Steve.
    1. Re:Avoid ask.slashdot for a few days... by adam31 · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Remember that this speech was given to students graduating Stanford... not high school. Whether a degree is worthwhile, in the context of the audience, is moot.

      The point of the speech is to encourage students to "ACCOMPLISH SOMETHING". Graduating isn't the top of the mountain, it's base camp. It's not an accomplishment unless they use it to propel themselves. blah blah blah. Potential is for losers.

    2. Re:Avoid ask.slashdot for a few days... by selfdiscipline · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Wow, you got modded as troll.
      I must've hit the nail on the head.
      Anyway, I'll probably finish my college degree, but I won't be resentful of you. Envious of you for finding a path to success that avoids college, though.
      I get really irritated when people talk about how valuable college is, because: I'm here, and I'm not seeing it. I guess you could say that "College is what you make of it," but I know that I could be making a lot more of my education if it wasn't for those pesky classes sapping my energy and desire to learn.
      Even for the average Joe, I really don't think college is that valuable. Most people learn things when they can find the information personally revelant, and the material in college is usually taught in such a dry, abstracted way that it's very difficult to find an immediate application in your own life. Also, what you don't use, you forget... and 4 years gives you plenty of time to forget.
      There are so many people that disagree with me about my views that it's hard not to think that I may be mistaken somewhere... but I really haven't heard any good reasons for why college is worth the cost, other than the fact that employers assume that a degree is a prerequisite to a position in their company (And that also may just be a rumor... I think studies have shown experience is more important than education for increasing your chance of getting hired).

      --


      -------
      Incite and flee.
    3. Re:Avoid ask.slashdot for a few days... by glenebob · · Score: 1, Insightful

      -1 redundant???
      Holy fuck... Looks like a mod or two need to use their high priced PHD's and kill themselves...

    4. Re:Avoid ask.slashdot for a few days... by Andrew+Cady · · Score: 4, Insightful

      This is an absurd and offensive characterization. A huge number of competent people lack the professional qualifications, connections, or luck to escape underemployment. This is particularly true in the software industry today, as opposed to a decade ago.

      The disconnect between professional requirements and competence is a serious social problem. There are certainly incompetents without qualifications, but there are plenty of amply competent (potential) workers without them -- what do you say to those?

      Steve Jobs hardly offers a solution. He entered the business at a time when hundreds of new businesses testified to the potential for entry. Today, the barriers to entry are far too high for the mere ability to produce a superior product to suffice, and it is plain to observe that there are no new entries to speak of. Of course, this is the fate of every market; any serious economy of scale means coalescence to oligopy sooner or later. So, what do you say to today's young Steve Jobs who cannot find his way to a job interview?

    5. Re:Avoid ask.slashdot for a few days... by jonnystiph · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Ug... Job's touting dropping out will undoubtedly start a flurry of "ask.slashdot" questions similar to:

      Your comment was funny, and well put. However, I am a Linux Sysadmin, with many tattoos (no piercings or long hair however). I can say that Job's had many of the right ideas. I dropped in on many college classes, because I didn't have the money either.

      The result, is a very well rounded education. Also the ability to teach myself skills that are relevant to the work place. The key is really self-drive. If you REALLY want to learn, there is little stopping you. College is great from some. Myself, I honestly prefer a self-teaching method. It really comes down to your choice of learning.

      So yes, there are many people out there that think they can avoid the work of college by dropping out and landing a "leet job", and there are at least a few that care enough to work even harder to teach themselves.

      --

      If we don't make light of everything, we are just stumbling in the dark - Blank

    6. Re:Avoid ask.slashdot for a few days... by TinyManCan · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I don't think that you are correct about the barriers to entry being too high to start something new.

      There are technologies which have radically changed almost everything about peoples lives in the last 10 years. Do you really think that every product or technology is as good as it can be.

      I don't think that there has ever been a better time to start a new disruptive companies. Startup costs are at an all time low, your ability to communicate to the masses has never been higher.

      Maybe I'm just an optimist.

    7. Re:Avoid ask.slashdot for a few days... by gravteck · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Whenever I see posts debating the value of a college education on Slashdot, I can't help but shake my head at posts along the lines of "taking pointless classes, wasting my money. etc." When it comes to classes that are mandatory in your major, I can understand the frustration of their seeming irrelevancy. However, it is your choice what college and program you attend, and there's nothing preventing research into the classes and programs before "wasting your money on them." I go to Vanderbilt University, and I chose it based on national ranking, reputation of the Engineering school, financial aid, and grant money for research that the departments receive. I don't go to college just to waste my money in class. I get to meet people from all over the country in the world. I get to avoid the real world for four more years, continue the the experience of being young in an environment of people with similar attitudes. Friendships and memories in college are part of the whole deal (IMO) also. Maybe I'm of a different breed cause I don't consider myself the typical Slashdot geek. I've played sports in college (walk on), partied frequently, had serious relationships in school, but somehow in the middle of that I still love to program and do research. Computers and geekdom aren't inherent in my personality, CS and Mathematics is merely what I study. So before going to college, you should probably decide how your personality is going to react to college life and its benefits. Don't complain about the system when it's you controlling your choices.

    8. Re:Avoid ask.slashdot for a few days... by Andrew+Cady · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I don't think that you are correct about the barriers to entry being too high to start something new.
      I meant in that specific market (PC manufacture). Barriers to entry are small in new markets and progressively rise with time. There are of course always new markets, but even the initial barriers to entry are often prohibitive.
      There are technologies which have radically changed almost everything about peoples lives in the last 10 years. Do you really think that every product or technology is as good as it can be.
      Do you really think superior product is sufficient for success? (You must be new here!) Anyway, the nature of modern technique is that any new product can be duplicated by a larger company that will be able to achieve a much higher scale of production, acquire capital, materials, labor, and publicity at a much cheaper price, and afford a far greater up-front loss. There are certainly areas in which a new business is possible, but it requires a lot of luck to find yourself in one.
      I don't think that there has ever been a better time to start a new disruptive companies. Startup costs are at an all time low, your ability to communicate to the masses has never been higher.
      This is of course nonsense by any objective metric. The number of successful businesses being started today is smaller than ever and getting smaller. The best time to start a business was surely at the beginning of the industrial revolution, or any time before that. After industrialization, competence becomes a commodity.
    9. Re:Avoid ask.slashdot for a few days... by killjoe · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I went over to the apple web site and did a few random searches for jobs there. Virtually every single one requires a degree although some say "or equavalent experience". Most flat out require a degree.

      If Steve applied for a job at his own company he probably would not even get interviewed.

      --
      evil is as evil does
    10. Re:Avoid ask.slashdot for a few days... by lgw · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You either need college or an extensive apprenticeship. Either is fine. Which one will be faster depends on how good the school is vs. how good the work environment is, but work environments tend to be a *lot* more focused.

      The problem, of course, is finding that magical first job that will hire you without either experience *or* education. Good luck with that. The most useful thing about college is the internships - the best way ever around the first job Catch-22.

      I will say that the code written by people who worked in tech support for years, then QA for years before finally making it into programming tends to be damn good. Nothing like living with the consequences of bad code for many years to build the proper values. A degree does tend to be faster than that path, however.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    11. Re:Avoid ask.slashdot for a few days... by damsa · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah, sad that you have to buy a company you started in order to get a job there.

    12. Re:Avoid ask.slashdot for a few days... by ThePromenader · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I can say I sympathise. I am an Architect by degree, but today am working in the Graphic arts and photography fields. Thus, as far as my trades are concerned, I have no schooling at all.

      A while back I was looking for salaried work (instead of the usual freelance - which I've gone back to BTW), and all the ads were for looking for someone "imaginative and independant" but with at least a college degree. I couldn't help but thinking that what they were looking for was a perfect contradiction.

      Some time later I was speaking with a client who was looking for someone in his design department, and he was commenting on the schools his candidates were attending and judging them on that. I said to him: "do you want ideas, or conformism"? He looked at me and said "Ideas, of course." To tell you the truth I don't know who he hired but you get the picture.

      The whole educational system needs a workover, but this won't happen until the job market changes. If everyone is looking for independant, free-thinking people who really care about what others want, instead of the usual conformist self-interested self-preserving lemming we are trained to be, schools of course will follow suit and teach us WHY we're learning instead of just promising us that we'll have the world if we follow their orders. Today's educational system is very confusing and discouraging to anyone with ideas of his own.

      --

      No, no sig. Really.

      ThePromenader
    13. Re:Avoid ask.slashdot for a few days... by Stween · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Agreed, I do not have a college education and I am considered a senior developer where I work. I happen to work with a few people that ARE jealous of that fact that they spent 4 years getting a computer science degree and I am at a higher level and make more money.

      Then the people you work with probably took the degree simply to get a job, and perhaps shouldn't have. Perhaps they were fed bad information before University, that the degree was their best way to go.

      I've said it before, and I'll say it again. A degree is primarily for people interested in the subject material. A degree offers experience with a wide variety of technologies and opens the student up to ideas which would just not be seen in industry. If a kid wants money, and just wants to learn what they need to, there's a big bad job industry out there waiting.

      Job-seekers and employers everywhere realise that a good degree from a good institution is worth something, and employers can see it as a good starting point for that employee, but it does not equate to real-world experience. It equates to an ability to learn, and an ability to work, without silly levels of assistance from others. The kids you work with are probably realising this the hard way, after 4 years of being told that the degree would get them places. (It did, it got them their job. They're now realising that they have to work for more than 4 years to progress further.)

    14. Re:Avoid ask.slashdot for a few days... by Bimo_Dude · · Score: 3, Insightful
      The whole educational system needs a workover, but this won't happen until the job market changes

      I think you've hit the nail on the head with this statement. The educational system definitely needs to change. To me, the issue is that colleges and universities try to tailor their courses and programs for whatever they perceive as the current needs of the job market. Usually, by the time the students who've enrolled in the latest "fad degree program" graduate, the needs of the job market have changed. Also, when you consider the original purpose of the university (learning for learning's sake - primarily theoretical), it completely defeats the purpose. Nowadays, most kids go to college to learn skills to get a job to make money. When the primary motivation for learning something is money and not an actual interest in the topic, this will likely lead to failure.

      The educational system needs to be split into two separate systems: One for the theoretical type of thinker, and one for the prictical type of thinker. The theory folks can devise the bleeding edge ideas for new technology developments, and the practical folks can implement those ideas.

      IMHO, having a degree is not always necessary. Look at my family:

      • Sister 1: PhD in organic chemistry; university professor; moderately successful; big debts
      • Sister 2: MS in Mathematics; schoolteacher; moderately successful; not as deeply in debt
      • Me: HS diploma; well-paid geek; moderately successful; no debt
      All three of us are happy with what we do. For me to reach the same level of success as my sisters, all I did was have an interest in what I do, read a ton of books, screwed up / fixed many systems/networks/databases (my own, of course), and always asked questions of those who are more knowledgeable than me.
      --
      "Teleporting Rodents with D-Cell Battery Displacement" theory -- IgnoramusMaximus (692000)
    15. Re:Avoid ask.slashdot for a few days... by ebuck · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It is an intresting dilemma, but lest we all forget:

      Jobs didn't apply at his own company.

      If you feel that you have the skill to go out and make money, there's basically two routes:

      1. Convince someone else that you are worth what you desire to earn.
      2. Start a company.

      Jobs picked #2. To start a company, you need no credentials, but the list of required skills vary dramatically. You don't need to graduate to start a company, but you need to keep the company alive. Usually keeping the company viable is much more effort than getting a degree.

      Now if you're running a successful company, you want to hire people with degrees. In part because people with companies are already working for themselves. In part because you can't run a company where everyone is seriously about to jump ship to set up their own shop.

    16. Re:Avoid ask.slashdot for a few days... by ThePromenader · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The world would be a much better place if evryone did their job for the sake of the job and had a good time doing it.

      I'm really beginning to dislike the phrase "make money". Money is work, a purely symbolic representation of a person's labour; With it a person can trade the product of his labour with anyone else's - instead of trading chickens for grain for bricks like we used to.

      People seem to think today that "making money" is something you can do without work - but even if you find a way to, don't forget that money is the result of someone else's.

      --

      No, no sig. Really.

      ThePromenader
  2. Sure, a few people drop out because they are smart by Realistic_Dragon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...but a lot more drop out because they are stupid.

    --
    Beep beep.
  3. Bah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I think Jobs' success is in spite of the fact that he dropped out of college, not because of it.

    He also dropped acid in his younger days. That a good thing too??

    1. Re:Bah by Mr2001 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      He also dropped acid in his younger days. That a good thing too??

      Frankly, we'd all be better off if more people were willing to broaden their mental horizons.

      I'm not saying that acid (or any other drug) makes you smarter or gives you better ideas, but it does let you look at old things in a new way, and it changes your thought process temporarily so that you'll come up with different ideas and connections than you would've otherwise. Especially on subjects like your own life, personality flaws, and future - things that most people are normally too blinded by ego to think about critically.

      --
      Visual IRC: Fast. Powerful. Free.
  4. Looks like sound advice.... by zanderredux · · Score: 4, Insightful
    ...like "do not think that you, freshly-graduated students, are better than everyone else. It takes more than a degree to really stand out."

    Sounds like good advice to me!

  5. Just because Jobs dropped out... by mjpaci · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...and it worked for him AND Gates dropped out of Harvard and it worked for him, doesn't mean that it OK for everyone to drop out.

    In general University/College is a GOOD thing. However, some people's paths take them elsewhere.

    --Mike

    1. Re:Just because Jobs dropped out... by stoolpigeon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It would be interesting to see the percentages-- though of course it would be difficult to come up with the numbers -- of succesful drop-outs vs. succesful graduates. Having a couple high profile drop-outs gives that option a lot of exposure but tends to ignore the huge number of drop-outs who are actually beginning/continuing a pattern of failure.

      And of course, no one path is for everyone. Not everyone should spend the time getting a degree. But I would wager that many more would benefit from a degree than actually earn one.

      --
      It's hard to believe that's how Micronians are made. Why don't we see it right now by having you both kiss one another?
    2. Re:Just because Jobs dropped out... by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Neither Jobs nor Gates really made any great breakthroughs in science or engineering, either. Gates was a pretty good programmer, and Jobs had a friend who was a pretty clever hacker (i.e., Woz.) Gates had the connections and acumen, and Jobs had charm, a smart friend, and some cunning. Good for business. But frankly, I don't think either of them, or the other college-dropout-tech-millionaires, really go into the "great minds" category. Business success is about work, energy, networking, and leadership, things which are not the exclusive provenance of the university.

    3. Re:Just because Jobs dropped out... by Goalie_Ca · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Woz dropped out too. I'd put him into the great minds because he did a hell of a lot more technologically than a lot of grads still can't do.

      --

      ----
      Go canucks, habs, and sens!
  6. what's wrong with this? by aendeuryu · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Universities are filled with people who are there just because someone felt they had to go to university. If a speech like this makes them question what it is that's really important about a university education, then that's probably more thought-provoking than half the shit they actually DID have to study at university.

    Granted, it'd be better as an address to freshmen than the graduating class, but there's still nothing wrong with it.

    To anybody who thinks it's stupid for Jobs to play down the importance of a university education, I ask this: what is being done to demonstrate the importance of a university education? Other than talking about the importance of a piece of paper, that is.

  7. Smart Kids by teoryn · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't think people at stanford need 'brainwashed' into thinking that they should get an education.

  8. Good For Him by Mean_Nishka · · Score: 4, Insightful
    You know what? Good for him.

    I don't think the point of his speech was that dropping out is cool. It was that hard work and determination are what you need to be successful.

    Say what you want about Jobs, he's a gifted businessman who knows how to sell. He had the right product in the 70's at the absolute best time.

    Your mileage, of course, will vary :).

  9. school sucks by benca1 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    School teaches to the lowest common denominator, and rewards conventional and predictable thinking. School is hell for brilliant people, that's why most they can't hack it. But man, if you want to work for others, there's no better place to go then school.

    1. Re:school sucks by Nasarius · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Bullshit. Go to a research university, find a professor you like, and start doing interesting stuff. I'm just at a public university, but the classes are pretty good, and the work I do on the side helps me learn huge amounts of stuff about my field.

      You'll get out as much as you put in. If all you ever do is take engineering classes and do the required minimum work, you'll have wasted a great opportunity.

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
    2. Re:school sucks by GoofyBoy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      >but what are you supposed to do for the 12-16+ years of school before you're allowed to really get into what interests you.

      Get into stuff that interests you?

      Seriously, you can't pick up a book and read? You can't do things on your own? Does the only thing that interests you at age 12 involve pressing buttons on multi-million dollar toys and then reading the a series of numbers on a print out?

      Who exactly are you waiting for to give you permission to do what you want to do?

      Stop waiting to be spoon-fed.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
  10. Re:Guess what by MyLongNickName · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Education != College.

    College can provide a wonderful education, if the student is ready for it. I started college when I was 16, but I was too immature even though the "test scores" said otherwise. I needed to grow up, get life experiences. I did these things (though I didn't realize it at the time), and graduated when I was 24.

    Had I gotten through school by the time I was 19, which was the pace I was heading, I would have had a college degree and a job I would have hated. Probably would have been found hanging by a rope by now. Instead, I love what I do, and life only gets better by the day.

    Summary: College is education for those ready to receive it. Same goes for life in general.

    --
    See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
  11. Re:Sure, a few people drop out because they are sm by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Of course, your post completely ignores the real issue: That they shouldn't have gone to college in the first place.

    The US has gotten so fixated on sending kids to college that we've lost sight of the reasons why we wanted them there in the first place. As a result, the quality of education has been declining, while the amount of debt our kids pile up before ever starting a job has been rising. And how many of those kids use their college degrees to do amazing things like sell real estate or become plumbers. i.e. What did that degree buy them other than a wad of debt?

    That's not to say that education is a bad thing. But people always get the best bang out of an education when they know they want it. Sending them to school before they know what they want to know only devalues it for everyone. Teach your kids to wait until they're ready. Then they can be sure that they really want to take on a college education.

  12. I'll agree with what Steve says by log0n · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I never finished college and it has yet to hurt me professionally, financially or emotionally (partly I didn't have the money, mostly I didn't really find it useful for my goals to bother coming up w/ the money - and I went to a good 4 year east coast school with an extremely good comp sci program).

    If you're talented, smart, and *most importantly* not lazy, not having a degree doesn't matter in the big scheme of things. With those assets you're more than capable of working around and moving beyond the confines of the traditional 'system' most people end up dealing in (IMO, because they aren't talented enough, smart enough or lack the work ethic to do anything to change things).

    Degrees are nice and they do make joining the higher class system (white collar?) easier, but IMO, a lot of people also use degrees as a crutch for rationalizing avoiding the need to do anything meaningful.

    If you're talented, smart and actually enjoy hardwork, the world is your oyster. Persuing a degree may even be a distraction from you obtaining your purpose and potential.

    $.02

    1. Re:I'll agree with what Steve says by Nasarius · · Score: 4, Insightful
      If you're talented, smart and actually enjoy hardwork, the world is your oyster. Persuing a degree may even be a distraction from you obtaining your purpose and potential.

      Try doing real, novel science without a Ph.D. Sure, you can go into IT or even software engineering without a degree, but there's tons of interesting stuff that you simply won't be able to comprehend without years of school.

      I mean, have you seen the cool toys physicists get to play with these days?! ;-)

      --
      LOAD "SIG",8,1
    2. Re:I'll agree with what Steve says by GoofyBoy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      >If you're talented, smart and actually enjoy hardwork, the world is your oyster.

      Um.. the same could be said if you are good-looking, born with rich parents and get along with everyone.

      The point I think is that most people are not talented enough, smart enough, enjoy hardword enough, good-looking enough, have parents who are rich enough or get along with enough people and so need all the help they can get, including that university degree.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    3. Re:I'll agree with what Steve says by lee1026 · · Score: 1, Insightful

      trying to learn chemistry and/or engineering with out a lab is just like tryying to learn how to rig together a computer with out the computer. you will know what everything does, and in theory how everything connects. but when you actually go and bulid the darn thing, you are staring at the pile of papaers going "oh crap"

    4. Re:I'll agree with what Steve says by Triones · · Score: 2, Insightful

      PhD is not about taking classes!
      It's just about research only.

      But anyway, in most colleges, you need to pay for the classes if you're not a regular student already.

      I agree that almost all stuffs can be learned without taking classes... except those new research that is not even written yet.
      Well, theoretically, these days you can just download the conference/journal papers too.

      But the grandparent post said "doing real, novel science". So it's not about 'learning', it's about creating new stuffs for others to learn.
      A PhD is awarded when you accomplish that. You won't get the degree even if you take _every_ single class, and learn _everything_ in the field.

  13. Speak for yourself. by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 3, Insightful

    High school was like that for me. Going to college---even state school---was like night and day. Suddenly, the kids who sullenly made it a pain in the ass to be there vanished. I got to learn from people who were really and truly competent; I had the time to take courses that just seemed cool at the time, that probably wouldn't be useful in any future job, but I took them because I wanted to learn about something.

    Yes, there were a few fools and charlatans teaching, but I dealt with it; I got to work with some of the cleverest, brightest folks I know.

    For me---who'd never known there were other geeks out there---it was a transformative experience.

    Clearly, your mileage may vary. But what you get out of school is, at the very least, proportional to what you put into it. Blaming The Man for not hacking it in school is pretty damn weak.

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
    1. Re:Speak for yourself. by Andrew+Cady · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Clearly, your mileage may vary. But what you get out of school is, at the very least, proportional to what you put into it. Blaming The Man for not hacking it in school is pretty damn weak.
      Tell that to Galois. Frankly, students who are impressed by today's schools are unexceptionally unimpressive. I've met teachers less competent than me, and teachers more competent than me, but neither has been able to teach me anything I couldn't better learn on my own, or anyway outside the school system. School offers the advantage of regular evaluation, without which motivation can be difficult, but so far as education the approach is obviously wrong. And the motivation problems are largely an artifact of the schooling system: nobody is learning what he really wants to learn.

      To learn a subject requires a combination of practice, which of course schooling cannot provide, and progressive and complete in-take of knowledge, which it provides poorly at best. More concretely: if you want to learn how to program, you hack until you find it easy, and you study whatever you need to know until you have a deep and lasting understanding of it. The very organization of schooling precludes this: you study a subject until the end of a semester, then you stop. Generally the "subject" is a collection so large as to preclude a deep understanding of any part within the time provided, and such is never necessary to receive the highest grade. It's simply insane.

      But what you get out of school is, at the very least, proportional to what you put into it
      Don't forget that what you put in to school is also proportional to the opportunity you lose in other endeavors, such as learning to program or to write poetry.

      School precludes any serious intellectual endeavor, simply through its dictates over time. This is progressively less true until one achieves tenure, but it is true enough for men like Einstein to find more opportunity to do physics in a patent office than a university. This sad state of affairs is not limited to Germany or to the past.

      The real tragedy, though, is when men like G. H. Hardy conform to the dictates of the system in their ignorant youth, and lose much of their intellectual prime in the process. Hardy is no exception: he is one example of an entire generation of British mathematicians who wasted their minds mastering a poorly-designed standardized test. This specific problem has been acknowledged and addressed, but surely not in fact remedied. It exists in all university schooling today, in admissions, in grading, and in graduation requirements.

      A solution is not to be found in platitudes about getting out what you put in.

  14. Hypocrite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Why do Apple's job listings require four year college degrees then?

    Steve Jobs is full of hot air.

  15. Re:Reminds me of a satire article about Ellison by nandu_prahlad · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sorry Dude,

    That larry ellison speech has been proven to be a fake

  16. What a dick! by NineNine · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Telling people to do that is like telling little kids to drop out of school to become NBA stars... for 99.99% of people, college is a good thing. He got lucky, and suggests more kids do it? Is he gonna bail all their asses out when 99% of them are working in a fucking fast food restaurant for the rest of their miserable lives? What a shortsighted, obnoxious, dick.

  17. Universities are in trouble by Inverted+Pilot · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Bravo to Jobs for speaking the truth. Universities, American ones anyway, are largely a waste of time. They're commercial enterprises above all, and for that reason they inflate grades to keep students in place and corrupt research in order to attract grants.

    I took a four-year degree from a reputable American school and thought it largely a waste of time. I had some worthwhile experiences, but the good parts could have fit into two or three semesters. It was basically a rip-off, and everything I do professionally today is the result of self-education and experience.

    When my daughter grows up, I will propose to her that she read and travel (rigorously) instead of taking a formal degree.

  18. Yes... by Arcanix · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you really want to think "out of the box" there is no better way than tripping. At some point, you will realize you have become the box, and that's when the real learning begins...

  19. Specialists need not apply by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I suggest you drop the assumption that an education should result in gainful employment. The world needs well-rounded educated, open-minded, critical thinkers even if their university major didn't lead to employment in the same area. A plumber with a Ph.D.? So be it. A truck driver with a couple of undergrad degrees? Sure. The world is a better place for it, because we -need- plumbers and truck drivers and we -need- educated, broadminded people that aren't simply narrow-minded specialists.

  20. A year of college will do wonders for most people by artemis67 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...whether they are prepared for it or not.

    College isn't just about the degree and the career. College is about a way of critically evaluating the world around you.

    Of course, you get out of it what you put into it, but I'm willing to bet that most everyone who dropped out of college after the first year will wish, within the following ten years, that they had stuck with it.

  21. Re:Sure, a few people drop out because they are sm by Sj0 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If you're that weak, it wasn't meant to be.

    (/me went to college three years after high school. You'd be suprised how motivating a shit job at minimum wage is.)

    --
    It's been a long time.
  22. Re:90% of Jobs's success by unother · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't know about this.

    Woz was the engineer that designed and built the Apple II, true. But Steve provided the vision, style, and intuitive grasp of the need for the personal computer. That framework was how Apple grew into a great company. I'm not certain that Woz would've done this alone--I imagine there were plenty of hand-designed computers of that day and age which are rotting away forgotten somewhere, yet are scions of exemplary engineering.

    I would say that Woz was probably much luckier to know Steve than the other way around. Without Steve, Woz would have been just another engineer--a talented and remarkable one, yes; but Steve managed to bring a world-altering vision to the table.

    That is much rarer than great engineering skills.

  23. Re:Sure, a few people drop out because they are sm by OSXCPA · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I left college after 2 years because I was bored to tears. Joined the Marines. Went back to college 6 years later *highly* motivated and enjoyed the heck out of learning - took CS classes for fun. My fellow undergrads, mostly straight from High School, hated their classes and hated me - I was the jerk who didn't listen to them whine about how hard their schedules were, or how much different classes sucked. My experience - most of them were too immature to appreciate the opportunity they had, and they had insufficient life experience to know that they should feel passionate about anything at all, let alone learning. Long story short - if you are burning up to go to school, go. If you aren't, be honest with yourself and do 'something else' until you figure out what you want to study. Don't let $ keep you back either - I worked my way through school. It is possible, but difficult - and I wouldn't have it any other way. Whatever you do, light your own ass on fire to get something worthwhile done - no one will teach you that. Hard work is it's own best reward.

  24. Arrogance of Good Looks by reporter · · Score: 3, Insightful
    As usual, Steve Jobs is arrogant about his capabilities. Perhaps, Jobs should also discuss his fortunate endowments that other people do not possess.

    I am referring to physical good looks. The "Economist", a while back, reported on a study which indicated that height is important and seems to be correlated with financial success. So, too is good looks.

    A good example is Pamela Anderson. She has little acting talent, but she managed to latch onto television role after television role.

    Contrast her with Meryl Streep. Streep is less attractive but worked very hard to achieve what she accomplished.

    Jobs, like Pamela Anderson, is blessed with good looks and a winning personality. Most of us have probably worked with people with such physical endowments. People with them have a much easier time in life than people without them.

    Not surprisingly, the average height of a CEO is above the average American height. So is Jobs' height. Before he tells people how they should mimic him, he should first ask the people around him to forgive him for his arrogance.

  25. Re:Sure, a few people drop out because they are sm by AKAImBatman · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That being said, I did learn something of great import while in undergrad. After getting mediocre grades throughout I somehow matured a little bit and taught myself how to learn. This was the most important thing I got out of undergrad.

    The part about this that I find so frustrating is that it's such an expensive lesson for kids. I was a home schooler myself, and my mother constantly emphasized that what we learned was less important than learning *how* to learn. While I'm sure that many would take that to mean that she didn't teach us, nothing could be farther from the truth. Rather, I *wanted* to learn many subjects because I had practical uses for them outside of the classroom.

    Do you have any idea how cool it is to look at a Trig book and think, "Oh, the raycasting engines I can make with this baby..." :-)

  26. This is the problem with success stories by nysus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    For every success story you hear, the other 99,999 are never told. For every genius who dropped out of school to become CEO of an multi-national corporation, there are thousands of other geniuses who wound up broke and unhappy.

    --

    ---Technology will liberate us if it doesn't enslave us first.

  27. Re:Sure, a few people drop out because they are sm by jrcamp · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The fact is that most people will have to go to college to obtain a successful career. I would imagine that the dropouts who become billionaires would average out to be a statistical fluke.

    We live in a different world today than 100 years ago when the elite sent their sons and daughters off to college. Back then, those going to college didn't have to make a living. They already had all the money they needed. They went for pure academic reasons. Your argument is that these circumstances still apply today. They don't.

    Today you have a wide middle class instead of just the poor and the rich. Today regular people can go to college. Today regular people can gain successful careers from an otherwise poor upbringing. But today most people must go to college to obtain the standard of living desired.

    Sure kids should also want to learn new things and expand their mind. It is still an academic institution, after all. But you cannot discount the fact that the reason parents push their children into going to college is that they need it to survive. And, perhaps, to make sure they don't live in their basement for the rest of their natural born lives. Of yesteryear it may have been normal for children to live their whole lives in the ye ole log cabin.

    Things change.

  28. Success = Creativity + Ambition + Hard Work by vinn · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've thought long and hard about this since graduating from college. I've seen a lot of people do some extraordinary things. The person who runs the division I work in (with about 15,000 people) never went to college, and I'm not sure he graduated from high school. He does happen to be a genius and I suspect he would have went to college if it wasn't for the fact he was successful by the age of 18.

    If I interviewed two people for a job I'd always choose the one who had ambition, creativity and a great work ethic. College degrees and intelligence would be secondary. There is a place for that, but with good leadership you can get an ambitious person to do amazing things.

    The other factor that counts is common sense. Understanding the requirements of a job and relating to customers is very important. In a sense, everyone works for customers - our bosses are customers of sorts.

    For anyone still in school, don't get wrapped up in your GPA but don't drop out of college either.

    --
    ----- obSig
  29. College is not for everybody by Pingsmoth · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Many people told me in high school that a college degree is the road to success in life, and I have no doubt that it is. But after going to college for five years I have found that my friends who went straight into the workforce or learned a trade at a community college are now the ones who own houses, cars, and generally have much more money than I do.

    On the other hand, my degree allows me to pursue the same quality of life they enjoy, but at a job which will be intellectually challenging and personally rewarding. I just have to wait a bit longer for the tangible benefits.

    That said, I don't think it's appropriate to drop out of high school. College, sure, if you find something else you want to do. But for pete's sake, you really should have a high school diploma.

    --
    http://www.walkingtaco.com
  30. Different Paths for Different People by chia_monkey · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There's quite a hoopla about Steve's comments. I don't really see it as a "drop out, college is useless" comment that everyone (even the headline) makes it out to be.

    More importantly, we need to look deeper into what he said and why he said it. For some people, college probably is a waste of time. If he had stayed in college (pressure from family, etc), maybe Apple never would have come to be. Maybe he would have lost all motivation or thinking differently and would have graduated with his degree and got a job as an accountant or programmer somewhere. For Steve, his personality conflicted with the structured ways of university learning. For others, it could be the kiss of death to not get that college degree. Some people need need the schooling to mature a bit. I'm glad he dropped out, scraped for food, and was willing to do whatever it took to survive and to take his "beleaguered company" back.

    --

    "He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lampposts...for support rather than illumination." - Andrew Lang
  31. The real lesson... by MagicDude · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The real lesson should be that you don't need a college degree to be successful ..... but it helps. Stories like this spur people on to believe things like "School is for suckers, I'm going to go make it on my own". For every Steve Jobs, there's a million people who end up working menial jobs at a pathetic salary because they didn't persue their education. Getting an education and getting a good job isn't going to make you a millionare, but more likely than not it'll keep you from being destitue.

    College degrees today are quickly becoming what high school degrees were 40 years ago. Advancement in your job is linked to how much education you've gotten. Whether you know more or not is irrelevant, but having degrees count. I have a friend who is a Lt in the Air Force. He's been telling me how a masters degree is quickly becoming a requirement in order to advance into the higher ranks in his department (He's not in R&D or a repair unit or anything like that either). Another example, a few years back another friend of mine was working a summer job for the county doing road maintainence (AKA, scooping up roadkill). Since he wasn't a total screwball like the other full-timers, he got along well with his supervisor. They were discussing my friend's future at some point. My friend wanted to (and did) go to music school, but the supervisor said that if he wanted, after graduation from college, he could recommend him for a supervisor's job working for the county. When my friend asked how a degree in Music Education would be useful working for the county, the supervisor said the degree itself didn't matter, just that you had it. His own degree was in agracultural sciences. So for most mainstream people, a college degree is the best course of action. Maybe you don't have to go into your major's field, but overall you'll be better of having it.

  32. Re:Sure, a few people drop out because they are sm by roastedMnM · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The issue of working your way through college is confused greatly when the type of college in question is ommitted. In state colleges, or at least in the ones near my home town and the ones near my college,



    In private colleges or the Ivy league types (not just those colleges but colleges of that type) a 'work my way through' attitude will result in taking part time classes for years (and years and years and years)

  33. My personal story by pHatidic · · Score: 2, Insightful
    As someone who dropped out of college last fall to start my own company like Steve did, this makes me really happy that he said that. That being said, it was also totally a douchebag thing to do. Not exactly out of character for Steve though. For those who don't know, around half of Apple's engineers don't have college degrees in engineering.

    Honestly, Steve is my hero, and this is why. The guy didn't have a product, great technical understand, business skills, personal or social skills. And if he was a visionary, then what was his vision? No, Steve Jobs made his money as a philosopher. He had the philosophy that every computer should be simple enough for the average human to use, and it should be beautiful. Of all the things Steve has fucked up over the years, this one philosophy has remained, and he has carried Apple on this alone.

  34. Not the only big name to be a drop-out.... by SwedishChef · · Score: 1, Insightful

    there is also someone named Gates.

    --
    No one ever had to evacuate a city because the solar panels broke!
  35. this guy is intelligent... and he sees the pattern by super_ogg · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Why should students go and spend their money when they don't know what they want to be. University isn't a direction to help. It's a money pit. Wandering aimlessly through useless courses as you pay for them is a bad idea. There is no hurry to jump in to university straight out of school. Hell, technical colleges are starting to have a better job hiring rate after graduation than most university courses do. Even the 'prestige' ones such as engineering.

    Seriously, kids are lead too easily into things they don't understand. Take me for instance. I got suckered. Go into engineer, do computers, big market, lots of money, you're good at math. What a load of shit. Tables turned. Underpaid, overworked, jobs are going overseas or you have to have experience no company will give you an oppurtunity to get. Too much time and money to train someone these days. Well, back to school to become an teacher. And this is my choice.
    ogg

    --
    Black cat, searing pain, flames...? I must be in Heaven! - Homer Simpson
  36. Re:Not Feynman. by bursch-X · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Of course, the atomic bomb is responsible for saving more lives than any other thing in history.

    Great I'll tell this to all the victims of your mindless bombing of two cities with dense population in close succession in Japan. They'll thank me and the US for saving so many lives.

    Or do you think the lack of a World War III is just a coincidence?

    Just because there was no World War III proves that atomic bombs have prevented it? Cool line of reasoning.
    I tell you a secret. The fact that there was no World War III is solely because I am wearing grey socks on weekdays and ones with holes in them on the weekend (ever heard of the magic chaos butterfly? It's actually me and I'm always compensating).

    --
    There are two rules for success:
    1. Never tell everything you know.
  37. Re:Steve Jobs' experience was unique.. by Inspector+Lopez · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Why cant the open source community get behind an open source college?

    It's a fair question. And here are some answers.
    • http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Wikiversity is precisely such a thing. It is young, and parts of it that I have seen are quite lame, but the intent is good, and the structure is there. The content requires ... effort.
    • accreditation would be an issue. If you think that's silly, then contemplate what lack of accreditation or safety standards would mean for air travel.
    • Quite a few universities have stepped up to the "online degree" watering hole, and they have discovered that:
      • it is relatively easy to put up crappy content that no one will buy, and which will sully the University's good name.
      • it is remarkably expensive to put up quality content which is actually worthy buying; the cost rivals or exceeds bricks & mortar conventional courses.
      • there is usually very little incentive for regular faculty to participate in online course delivery, unless the enrollment is very high (why? because it is a lot of extra work). So, if you're looking for that extra special course in kinetic theory of plasmas with application to incoherent scatter, well, don't hold your breath.
      • Likewise, universities have "entrepreneurial" units to go develop stuff for online course delivery. This inevitably begets warfare with the Department that "owns" the course. Example: my university offered a "certificate program" of four courses in electrical engineering. This is just dandy, until the Electrical Engineering Department discovered (by accident) that someone else was offering their courses. The "entrepreneurial" unit hadn't quite bothered to check with the home Department...
    • To expand upon a topic in the previous list, the authoring tools for WWW-based content delivery are ... extremely poor, at least in relation to what you're trying to do. In a classroom, there is opportunity for detailed and remarkably complex interaction with a functioning expert system (the professor) as well as the other students. Just try to capture that functionality in some 'bot. Along those lines, see the recent James Fallows article explaining just how poor modern search engines are in answering questions. Google is wonderful! But it's also remarkably primitive compared to what we'd like to be able to do.
    • If you have ever wondered why there are so few really good WWW-based demos available, consider this: A really good, effective demonstration takes a minute or two to show to the class. However, it can easily take 12 hours of development time to prepare a quality demo that will be used one time, and fill 1 minute of lecture. It doesn't take long to realize that that development time is unjustifiable. (At my own university, there is the very real danger that the computer projection equipment will simply be out of order. There is no satisfaction in wasting 5 minutes of lecture time to show a 1 minute demo).
    • ... and for all you l33t h4korz or however you spell it, there is more to a college education than learning how to program good (as Derek Zoolander might have put it.) The economic forces which create a faculty work force continue to develop a faculty which, however haphazardly, values breadth and experience and (yes) literature and history in addition to being able to log on and hack.

      A college degree is not a commodity (yet); it is not like 87 octane gasoline dispensed at the pump. The college degree represents a period of time in which you study a lot of useless things in the hope that some of them will surprise you by being interesting; that the depressing or boring things will at least teach you how to wade through depressing or boring material for the rest of your life. It is a period of time when people stop being te
  38. Re:Not Feynman. by ColaMan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    From what I can tell, it was use The Bomb, or invade Japan. Estimated losses of allied forces invading Japan were gigantic. It was hardly mindless, it was simply a case of Us vs. Them. In that particular point in history, it was them. You don't have 4 years of war and then say, "Hell, we don't need to prove to them that we're capable of leveling their cities, lets just keep killing our troops for a few more years - we'll win eventually." You drop the damn Bomb, twice, to show the other side that you can make them, and they should really consider surrender.

    And the fact is that once The Bomb was about, there were lot of times where major powers would have usually gone to war, but were held back by The Bomb.

    So, for the sacrifice of 110,000 people, countless others got the chance to live.

    --

    You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
    There is a lot of hype here.
  39. Re:Nail, meet hammer. by rpozz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Look on job sites. Almost every decent vacancy requires a degree, some with a minimum of a 2:1.

    A lot of people on here seem to think they are 'above' getting a degree, that they're too smart for that and after school they can just stroll into a job because of their enormous intelligence. That only works for a very, very small number of people.

    A degree shows that you at least have a basic understanding of the subject, and have spent a lot of money, time and effort in the subject area of your choice. Who in their right mind would employ some kid into a reponsible job who had just finished school, had no proof that he knew shit, and had the arrogance to think he didn't need a degree?

  40. Re:Nail, meet hammer. by dmolavi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A degree also shows that you have a commitment to the field in which you're pursuing. After all, you don't spend 4+ years studying something that you're not really interested in doing. When the option was presented to me to earn my master's degree in Electrical engineering after I finished undergraduate work, I jumped at it. And I'm glad I did; it's bumped me ahead of the pack (and those l33t kiddies) when it comes to getting a job and subsequent promotions. As someone who regularly interviews people for positions at my company, I don't just blindly say "Whoa, PhD...he's the man!". A degree, or multiple degrees, are only part of the picture of a job candidate. Oftentimes, if one candidate comes in with a BS with some co-op or intern experience, and another with an MS and no experience, the BS candidate will be chosen, as the "on the job" learning they acquired is often as valuable, if not more so, than the additional degree.

  41. Re:Why then does Apple *require* degrees for IT jo by MrWa · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Being an IT Professional that "dropped out" like Jobs and Wozniak, it has always pissed me off that Apple requires "A BS in Computer Science"

    They never say that dropping out of college will help you get a job - ever notice that these highly successful college dropouts started their own company and didn't go to work for someone else? There's a lesson in there for you.