Slashdot Mirror


What Ancient Tech Do You Do?

neonfrog asks: "Before silicon, before electricity even, what the heck did those of us with geek brains do? Our brains have not evolved appreciably in half an eon (at least mine hasn't, but I may be descended from turtles). What would today's programmers have been doing centuries before the invention of the keyboard? What would an electrical engineer be doing a millennia or three before the concept of resistors and capacitors? What piqued their curiosity? Were their skills esoteric or exotic? They can't all have been Leonardo Da Vincis or court 'magicians', right? Summer's starting and, for some, it's hobby time. I bet the Slashdot community harbors quite a few Journeyman, or even Masters. I know a lot of geeks are beer-makers (and I do so appreciate you folk ... urp!) so there's no danger of that knowledge getting lost. What other ancient tech do you indulge in and keep alive? What are some good resources?"

68 of 308 comments (clear)

  1. my hobbies by bluelip · · Score: 5, Interesting

    hunt, homebrew beer/wine, tan animal hides.... you know.... the red-blooded american things.

    --

    Yep, I never spell check.
    More incorrect spellings can be found he
  2. i wondered this myself by pizza_milkshake · · Score: 2, Funny

    probably just typing on a rock

  3. Before the keyboard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
    What would today's programmers have been doing centuries before the invention of the keyboard?

    I can't say for sure, but it would probably only require one hand.

  4. Intaglio printmaking by FooAtWFU · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Because art is nifty, and because it's a massive leap to go from tweaking stuff with keyboard and mouse to actually scratching stuff onto a copper surface with an etching needle. Because it's fun squishing stuff under the thousands of pounds of pressure in the printing press. Because there is a bit of a puzzle figuring out how to get proper textures with aquatint, mezzoting, engraving, or drypoint, or stippling.... Nifty stuff, really.

    --
    The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
  5. not really ancient by Bodhidharma · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I roast my own coffee beans. Coffee has been around since the Dark ages and known in the West since the Renaissance so it's not really ancient. Besides, everyone roasted coffee until the late 19th century. It didn't come in cans until then. Still, it predates electronics and such. (As far as we know ...)

    Jim

    --
    A dyslexic man walks into a bra.
  6. Blacksmithing by digitect · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I was fortunate enough to work at an 18th century living history museum many summers, weekends, and holidays as a blacksmith. Nearly twenty years later, I am still impressed at how much can be done with steel and fire. The technology of tempering is ancient, and the same metalurgical chemistry is used everywhere today in instrument sharpening, oxidization resistiveness, and high strength/weight component design such as in an F1 racecar (when they choose to drive them).

    You can set up your own blacksmith shop now for not much more than some fireclay, an old hairdryer blower, some coal fuel, an short piece of railroad track turned upside down for an anvil (always used a forged metal, never cast) and a hammer. Although if I did it these days, I would be more disciplined about wearing hearing protection.

    --
    There is no need to use a SlashDot sig for SEO...
    1. Re:Blacksmithing by retostamm · · Score: 3, Informative
      I got a set of books on "How to build your own Metal Workshop" from here.

      It looks promising, but I have not started yet (mainly because the landlord does not appreciate foundry equipment in the appartment).

      Their catalog is really cool, they have reprints of documents from 1900, 1800 and before, all obsolete by now, of course, but that's how the Golden Gate and the Titanic were built.

      They also have an electrical section, for example, how to make an analog amplifier in a Jar from a speaker and a carbon microphone. Really neat stuff, and I wish I could tinker with it some more.

    2. Re:Blacksmithing by Tumbleweed · · Score: 4, Funny

      all obsolete by now, of course, but that's how the Golden Gate and the Titanic were built

      One of those is perhaps not the greatest example. :)

    3. Re:Blacksmithing by enigmatichmachine · · Score: 2, Informative

      one more for blacksmithing, i took a class at the local community college, and rented all the books at the library, and now have my own forge. its pretty cheap to setup. harbor freight has usable anvils for under 5o bucks, and the forge itself is propane mixed with air tossed into a box made of refractory brick or something similar. carefull, its HOT!!!!

      --
      -and occasionaly a giant moose.
    4. Re:Blacksmithing by Seraphim_72 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Trust me - Harbor Frieght sells a terrible anvil. Wait till you get to use a good one and then you will appreciate the difference. I work pt (for fun) at Arms and Armor I shudder to think of what it would cost to rebuy our forging equipment (especially the stakes) and we have a couple nice anvils and one that looks like we put it under a surface grinder daily - flat smooth - nice. As for doing the Gingery books - I highly recommend trying the casting ones, but as for the rest - it is a lot like 'roll your own linux' very educational, kinda fun, but man alive - your time is also worth something - try Grizzley tools.They are still junky tiawan/chinese tools - but they are considered the best of the low/pro-sumer tools. Sorry this was so long - meh.

      Sera

      --
      Slashdot, where armchair scientists get shouted down and armchair theologians get modded up.
  7. Same hobby, different tools! by facelessnumber · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well that's easy. I would have been a pirate.

  8. History of the Ancient Geeks by TheCamper · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Many geeks would have probably been monks; it's a structured environment where personality quirks wouldn't be a problem.

    Many would perhaps be smiths; blacksmiths, armorsmiths, glassworkers, etc. All types of smithing requires an advanced knowledge of the craft, with nuances more intricate than any xfree86 config file. What makes geeks tick is not sci-fi itself, or computers themselves, it's systems. Geeks love systems. Systems of numbers, systems of logic, computer systems, pen and paper games rules systems, computer language systems. Even non-geeks like systems. Physical Sports are systems; they are self consistent rule-based constructions. Geeks are merely overly obsessed with certain systems, such as the stars, or physics, or computer languages, much like an autistic person could be obsessed with anything, but he chooses a certain something. So perhaps any intricate systematic smithing craft would appeal to the ancient geek.

    1. Re:History of the Ancient Geeks by Short+Circuit · · Score: 2, Funny

      with nuances more intricate than any xfree86 config file

      Wow. You have no idea how much you've raised my respect for these things. Cognitive dissonance...what a feeling.

    2. Re:History of the Ancient Geeks by phixson · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Monks yep. You could renounce your worldly existence and join an order.

      Smiths nope. Unless you were rich, in which case you had actual education and intellectual opportunities, you did whatever you were _born_ to. If your family were farmers, you were a farmer, period. We tend to project our current state of affairs into our speculations about the past. This is fun, but it has no effect on history.

      Until the very recent past, there were geniuses laying bricks and plowing fields because the simple fact was, no matter how smart you were, there was no opportunity to use your brain to make a living. Maybe you could invent a better way to lay bricks? Maybe, but remember, there have been many other brick layers smarter than you and they didn't.

      If we're really honest, most of us, lucky as we are to be coding, are not really advancing the state of anything now. We're laying bricks. Granted with Java/C++/Python instead of clay and mud, but still laying bricks.

      At least we got to choose to be brick layers.

  9. What I would have been... by Baron_Yam · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Probably a failed Leonardo. I've always loved taking things apart, figuring out how they work, then trying to put them back together... and then imagining how to improve them despite my failure to reassemble the original design.

    I'd have been the peasant who starved because he was so busy trying to figure out how to get his ox to plow more field when all he had to do to survive was plant a small garden with his hands.

    Good thing I'm alive today and didn't live in centuries past.

  10. Make mead. by numbski · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Amen to this.

    I wanted to make my own cider, and despite my love for Cider, my new first love is Mead, and its near cousins, melomels, cysers....mmmmm

    My first 1 gallon batch of mead recently hit its stride finally. Dear GAWD is that stuff good.

    I swear, if you ever get a good mead, you'll never drink beer again. I'm not kidding, I'm dead serious. I have 5 gallons of strawberry melomel going right now, and another 5 gallons of some dark cider that has been going since mid-october. Both are far superior to their off-the-shelf alternatives, and these are just my first tries!

    Resources?

    The BrewBoard

    and if you wish to take my advice on the mead specifically:

    The Compleat Meadmaker by Ken Schramm

    That second link *is* an Amazon link, but not a referral link, so I'm not whoring.

    Oh, and yes, I did spell "compleat" correctly. Took me forever to find the book the first time. Oops.

    --

    Karma: Chameleon (mostly due to the fact that you come and go).

    1. Re:Make mead. by Muhammar · · Score: 2, Informative

      "I swear, if you ever get a good mead, you'll never drink beer again. I'm not kidding"

      Good cool mead taste masks the incredible quantity of sugar that you are actualy drinking. Sugars compete with alcohol for dehydrogenase and overworked alcohol dehydrogenase is the cause of the hungover.

      I swear, if you ever get a good mead hungover, you'll never want to drink again.

      --
      I doubt that we will ever figure out - and I suspect that even if we did figure out we couldn't do much about it
    2. Re:Make mead. by rossifer · · Score: 2, Informative

      Good cool mead taste masks the incredible quantity of sugar that you are actualy drinking.

      Not sure what you mean by "cool mead", but your statements are only true for what I've typically heard called a "sack" or sweet mead, which is much easier to make, but not as delicious as the dry recipies (IMHO). A dry mead is more my style, and has an amazing spectrum of flavors that really do justice to the layman's description, "honey wine".

      The citric acid is important to conceal the alcohol flavor in a dry mead, however... I think I'm going to be making some more real soon. This thread has me salivating at the thought...

      REgards,
      Ross

    3. Re:Make mead. by dbIII · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Make mead
      Funny thing is that a mead recipe if the first thing I ever got from USENET some time around 1990.

      I made it in PET bottles: when half the plastic had gone white with craze cracking from the pressure and the bottle had stretched by about one fifth it was time to drink it.

    4. Re:Make mead. by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That second link *is* an Amazon link, but not a referral link, so I'm not whoring.

      Well, for Pete's sake, put a referrer link in there next time. I mean, you're providing us with useful information and it's not like I'm going to save money if you don't put a referrer link in there - Amazon is simply going to keep the profit.

      Now, who would I rather see the money go to, Amazon or Numbski? That's easy.

      If you were selling your book there might be a conflict of interest, but Amazon has nearly every book in existence so this is just a matter of who gets the money, and contrary to the comments of some on Slashdot, there's nothing wrong with making money for your work.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  11. Blacksmithing by nrlightfoot · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I always thought that blacksmithing was kind of interesting, and it has some similarities with computer work.

    1) swinging a hammer all day can give you a repetetive motion injury like using a keyboard.

    2) When making complex things you have to pay attention to details and have an idea of what your working towards.

    3) You can undo mistakes fairly easily, just heat it up and pound out the error.

    4) There are lots of technical things to remember like metal compostions, metalworking techniques, and different ways to heat treat metals to give them different properties.

    5) It's rather a skilled job compared to being a farmer, and I suppose the pay might not have been too bad.

    Plus you can make your own swords and armor for D&D.

    --
    what sig?
  12. Sailing by southern · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I try to get out sailing after work everyday in the summer. Yes there is a navigation computer on board, but basics haven't change since humans took to the sea.

    --
    Chris Southern
    1. Re:Sailing by g-san · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'd agree. Take the basics of knots for example. You have knots that slip, knots that don't slip, knots that come undone easy under a load, knots you can trust for a few hours and knots you can trust for months, and those knots that you never tie because they don't hold or are known to get stuck. Knots that are functional, knots that are pretty and knots that are both. Those knots have been in use for hundreds of years, and there is a reason... they work.

      It's also very fuzzy and analog. The wind changes direction and speed, the current changes, you have waves, you sail trim may be dead on or not. There is no such thing as staying on a heading of 270 exactly for two hours. The weather for tomorrow may be what is predicted or may not, you learn to watch the water and the sky. Sure there are electronics on board, but if you are out on a clear day, it's all by your senses of sight, touch and hearing. Very unlike this binary behemoth that earns me my living (and pays for the slip.) And what I know about sailing will still be good in 5 or ten years, unlike most computer related topics.

  13. Gardening... by dasunt · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Yes. Gardening.

    Its geeky, in its own way.

    Not only do you have layout, planting times, and organic methods, but there are loads of experimentation available.

    Do you want to use the French-Intensive method of gardening? How about the traditional method? Blocks or rows?

    This year, I'm experimenting with rooting suckers from tomato plants and seeing if the new plants are worthwhile producers. I'm also trying to plant late corn in between flowering beans. (I like to maximize my yeild from a small space.) Next year, I'm going to try interplanting lettuce and tomatoes, hoping that the tomatoes will keep the lettuce cool enough to extend the growing season. I'll also try more mulch next year, I think.

  14. Religion stifles advancement in our species by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Before silicon, before electricity even, what the heck did those of us with geek brains do? Oh, the geeks have only recently been truly free:
    Archimedes, the father of calculus, has his ancient texts bleached and written over with religious mumbo jumbo. Over 1800 years passed before Newton 're-discovered' calculus.
    Galileo proclaimed that the earth wasn't the center of it all. Then the Catholic church made him recant (this was the time of the Inquisition which killed a friend of his just a few years before). (it was only in 1992 that the Catholic Church said Galileo wasn't such a bad guy, and that was after 12 years of arguing)
    More recently Louis Pasteur, a lifelong rationalist, had his crazy ideas of bacteria and disease poo-poo'd by various religious leaders.

    Seeing a trend? Ancient geeks were free to test and invent only so long as the results agreed with the religious diatribe of the day.

    1. Re:Religion stifles advancement in our species by Monty_Lovering · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually you'll find that compared to say, Islam, Christianity was very backward until the renaissance.

      The Arabic Islamic world was the most advanced civilisation in the early centuries of the second millennium, whilst the European Christian world was stagnated around the bits of Greek science they could understand.

      In addition to developing from the knowledge of the Greeks in such areas as medicine, they developed our modern mathematical characters and the idea of 0. They also developed a law system where Christians and Jews could peacefully co-exist in Islamic countries, albeit as second class citizens.

      This was a far cry from the situation in Europe where anyone who was non-Christian in the same period was likely to end up dead. Even being suspected of something like witchcraft (normally an elderly woman with some property but no surviving relatives, funny that, eh?) was a death sentence, unless of course you weighed more than a duck.

      Somehow the Muslims in power were more able to tolerate the advance of science than the Christians in power during the same period.

      So the original post seems to be fair in its focus on Christianity as a bad example of established power structures fighting progress with dogma.

      And it still goes on; eggs, sperm, zygotes, blastoclysts and embryos with less nerve tissue than a per rat are claimed to have equal rights to born humans by the Roman Catholic Church.

      Jehovah's Witnesses oppose the transfusion of blood.

      Fundamental Christians deny the vast level of supporting evidence for an ancient naturalistically formed Universe where life developed under the control of natural selection, and insist on a literal 7 x 24-hour day creation. ... of course there are Muslims and Hindus capable of equivalent stupidity, plus stuff like Mormons, Scientologists, etc., but Christianity seem to win the contest as 'religion most likely to stifle scientific advancement'.

      Look at the lobby groups now most opposed to stem cell research...

    2. Re:Religion stifles advancement in our species by Stachel · · Score: 3, Informative

      "they [Arabic Islam] developed our modern mathematical characters and the idea of 0."

      This is actually not true: the concept of zero originates with Hinduism, around the 7th centure BC.:

      http://www.udupipages.com/book/hindhu.html
      http://www.atributetohinduism.com/Advanced_Concept s.htm

      --
      Stachel
    3. Re:Religion stifles advancement in our species by Monty_Lovering · · Score: 2, Interesting

      graphicsguy talks sense. If you look at the Biblical account, Adam-Abraham were monotheists, Abraham made a covenant with god, later his descendants entered into the Mosaic (nothing to do with early web-browsers) Law. It is either from the covenant with Abraham (ancestor of the Israelites) or from the Mosiac Law that one can date Judaism. Christianity is based on the belief that a man called Jesus was the Messiach (sp?), the Hebrew term for a saviour prophecied about in the Bible. One can say 'ooo, it most be true, the prophecies were fufilled it says so in the Bible'. One can also say that it is easy for someone to write a story about someone who came and detail how they fufilled the prophecies that made identify them as the Messiah, and for that person to actually not have done any or all of what the story says they did. If one views the simlarities between the Jesus story and the Buddha story, or the Vedic traditons about Krishna, then Jesus actually existing as he is described becomes more doubtful. Buddha was born of a virgin and had 12 disciples, for example. http://www.rastafarispeaks.com/forum/storeroom/con fig.pl?noframes%3Bread=49229 http://www.religioustolerance.org/chr_jckr.htm There is a very strong case for Jesus being a wholey or largely mythical person who was deliberatley invented or whose life was elaborated on and fictionalised to form the basis of a religion, blending other stories that were known at the time about various other god-men in other religious traditon. Thus Christianity's claim to pre-date Jesus is as dubious as Islam's claim that Jesus was JUST a prohet and Mohammed was the final messenger, and the similar claims made by Mormon's about Joseph Smith.

    4. Re:Religion stifles advancement in our species by samjam · · Score: 2, Interesting

      These are all good points.

      Interestingly those in the "stories" you refer to did not take their belief merely because they read other "stories" but because of their own experiences with God, which, strangely is a strong force in the lives of many in the less extreme religions.

      For instance, my belief in Jesus Christ is based on my own experiences in relation to the practice of the religion I study and not on account of "ooh, it must be true because of...".

      An interesting thing for you to look into would be the origins of belief and not just the history of belief.

      That there were pre-Christ prophecies is interesting but it was a source of faith to pre-Christ people who believed those prophecies because... because of what?

      I say that my belief comes through the action of the Holy Ghost in my heart when truth is taught, but this is entirely subjective to my own life; I say that a similar action took place in all ages when truth was taught to those who would receive it.

      You may decide this is rather freaky and superfluous, and a complex explaination for a bogus observation*, but if our existance pre-dates the creation and earth life; if we lived in the presence of God before our birth then it is not unusual for God to be able to speak to use through his Spirit convincingly to those who are willing to hear.

      [* I'm looking for truth, not explanations.]

      I only point this out so that you cn be aware that for many their religious belief is not based on some tenuous chain of reasoning but on the actual day-to-day mechanics of following what they have learned by experience to be good, and trying to learn more, yes, a sort of inner journey, but very real. This will of course sound like complete tosh to those who have no experience with it, and will be described as complete tosh by those who have rejected it (perhaps why they rejected it, who can tell?), but I'm doing it for me, not them, and I find it more real than the Millenium Dome, the UK Tax Credits Fiasco (and this government think they can run a national identity database).

      I find it the most satisfying thing in my life. Not because there is a cosy "it will be all-right-for-you" type feeling but because there is a part of me that says "I know" that takes joy and confidence and love in the whole thing. It is jam today and jam tomorrow.

      In short, John 7:17, John 17:3, you have to try it to know, and if you don't you won't. And yes, sometimes it takes extreme circumstances before some people try, but others will say "they just clutched at straws"; other peoples faith can never satisfy you or look reasonable to you.

      For a good short discourse on the development of faith as experienced by individuals, read http://scriptures.lds.org/alma/32

      You will certainly find it interesting, it is the process by which faith is developed, and is more real than tenuous reasoning on imcomplete knowledge.

      I'm happy to discuss this more, but you may prefer to get some Mormon Missionaries in and ask them just how individuals are supposed to get a certain knowledge of God, and then try it! It's a good experiment.

      Interestingly, they won't try and convince you! (Can you believe that in a religion?) They will teach you and encourage you to try what they teach if you want. You will come across things you never imagined could exist, or perhaps you will say you had forgotten a long time ago. If you think it is a trick, why not try and spot the trick?

      It will be interesting anyway, and certainly a new experience, I'd say try it.

      I'm not intending to get in to a long debate, I thought I would give the other view on Monty's excellent summary, and to show how two explanations of the same scene can fail to even overlap.

      Sam

    5. Re:Religion stifles advancement in our species by Monty_Lovering · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sam...

      I mention JW's and someone goes into apologist mode, I mention Joe Smith and someone links to lds resources - I have to say I preferred the tone of your post though.

      When we talk about the validation of religious belief by internalised experience we enter an area where there is less and less useful data.

      I can take you, a Christian friend of mine, someone from the local Spirtualist Church, a UFO abductee, a Jehovah's Witness, a Voodoo practitoner, assorted other animists, a Buddhist, a Scientologist... ... and they will all likely claim internal religious experiences that validate their belief structure.

      The curious thing is that some of these experiences will be anathematic to others. Some will interpret others religious experience as possesion by evil spirits, or body thetans. Others will view them as forms of self-dellusion.

      Now either all of these people are right, and they are tapping into something Universal and then wrapping it up in the referentials of their enculturation, or one of these people is right and the rest of us are doomed! doomed I tell you, or they are all wrong.

      Autosuggestion seems the most probable answer to me.

      If there is some Universal force they are experiencing it's strange that this leads to denial of others similar experiences as being authentic or from god. If only one 'way' assures us of a good outcome, then god is biased and is not fit for the 'job', as one's religious way is almost always a result of our place and family of birth and the idea of an unfair god damning people in ignorance is just offensive.

      Thus the experiences being belief-mediated internal self-validation is the simplest explanation.

      I am afraid that no matter how nice a Mormon you might be, your internal valdidations are of no more weight than a Papuan Anamist with a bone through his nose.

      The Mormons actually have a pretty good record regarding science. Some doctrinal points are nonsensical on points of fact; the tribe of Israelites journying to the New World, which has as little archaelogical evidence as the 40-years-in-the-wilderness of the Jews.

      But they actually build and run good Universities and have steadily distanced themselves from more extreme doctrines like polygamy, the second-class status of black people, and now it is hard to get a Mormon to discuss the doctrines which state the most exemplary Mormons become a 'god' in their own right and will dwell on a planet somewhere and have lots of spirit babies with many wives who will be sent to fill the bodies of intelligent being being born somewhere else in the Universe. (To those who've not studided comparative religions, I shit you not).

      But having been born in a religious cult, I have severe misgivings about the use of shunning to punish church members who go astray. Although the Mormons are not as bad as some groups, the use of shunning is a crude control technique.

      Effectively it means if you don't do what the local church says you should do, they will stop all of the people you know from that religion talking to you - even family. As many religions who use shunning encourage people to limit relationships with outsiders, this means if someone leaves such a high-control group they effectively have no friends, family or support circle to turn to. This keeps them in.

      Of course, I know more about Mormonism as it is practised in the USA, where shunning is a problem and something a lot of ex-Mormons feel very bitter about. Have a look on line for the support groups if you don't believe me. The UK may be more liberal. It's curious, you're the second Mormon from the UK I have met oline in a few months.

    6. Re:Religion stifles advancement in our species by samjam · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I hear all of what you say and don't disagree.

      I don't expect my validations to hold more weight with you than your own validations, but its good that you can see that this is what it comes down to, and its nice for me to realise I'm not looking for anyone elses approval of the current state of my learning process.

      As far as your theoretical group of friends, some of them may be lying and one of the liars may even be a mormon. Its had to know what experiences a person has had.

      As far as an unfair God damming people, you are right it is damn offensive (pardon) and such a god deserves no respect or worship; which leads to the idea that his "devotees" and "worshippers" may not fully know him, if they think this is what god is like.

      In my experience, belief in god often comes down to description of god.

      On your point of extreme mormon doctrines and comparitive religion, I have never come across a book that accurately represented mormon belief that was not published by a mormon, and have come to respective conclusions about catholics etc.

      [I was very happy when I came across a Catholic Priests life story where his mentor-priest said (roughly) "Look, nobody in their right mind believes for a minute that unbaptised babies will go to hell, but we can't explain it"]

      You might find a copy of Spencer J Palmers "Comparitive Religion" (compares mormonism to other religions) interesting. I think it forms part of the BYU religion curriculum.

      As for doctrine, I recall in the UK about 20 years ago a mormons might get excited about "sensational doctrine" which often was just gossip, and not checked against doctrinal sources. Mormons believe they can become gods about as much as the bible teaches, which is actually pretty definite. Blacks have never been second class citizens for mormons, and never "second class mormons" any more than non-Levite jews were second class jews. Mormons have not distanced themselves from polygamy as a doctrine, but do not practice it. (BTW did you know the first wife had to give permission to subsequent marriages?)

      As for control and shunning, I think it is not a good way to behave and it is contrary to mormon doctrine. I have heard this claim regarding various religions and have no reason do doubt it; however attending a mormon ward council would show how difficult it is to get anyone to do anything at all; but certainly any form of control or compulsion is wrong, and severely condemmned in mormon scripture: http://scriptures.lds.org/dc/121/41
      No power or influence can or ought to be maintained by virtue of the priesthood, only by persuasion, by long-suffering, by gentleness and meekness, and by love unfeigned;
      (See also v36,37)

      So where this happens it is just a case of human failing, maybe even by church leaders, and very regrettable. I have to say that the reference I cited is one of the most often taught doctrines in priesthood meetings, you remind me why this needs to be the case.

      I'm not even supposed to say "do it because I'm your dad and I say so" and I need reminding about that; thanks!

      I think some of what you observe may stem from the effects of religion on culture in areas of high religious density, we have a mildly expressive phrase among friends that goes "Utah mormons..."; but in their defense actual Utah mormons I have met have been very caring and sensitive.

      Finally can I congratulate us both for having participated in the most reasonable religious converasation that I believe has ever taken place on slashdot. I respect you as a sane reasoning human and would not be sorry if we met.

      Sam

  15. The same thing current grads are doing... by LordEd · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... would you like fries with that?

    --------
    +1 sarcastic

  16. food for the animals by josepha48 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    .. probably most geeks would be dead, with our bad eyesight, and all, only a few really smart ones would be saved ..

    --

    Only 'flamers' flame!
    Does slashdot hate my posts?

  17. building garages by The+Datamangler · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm building my 30x50' garage- except for the slab, I'm framing, roofing, wiring the whole thing myself. I'm what I guess "they" call an experienced DIY'er. My money making background is in remote data collection, so all this stuff I just sort of forge ahead and go for it. I rely heavily on the advice of friends and an amazing brother in law, but in the end, I'm the one that has to redo my mistakes and live with what I build.

    I think tinkering with wood would be a great alternative to coding.

    For resources, other than people, I get alot of stuff off websites experienced tradespeople put up. I have heavy guilt from never contributing the paypal 5 bucks, though. I know when I eventually get my website up about building plank wooden Dory's, I'll never get a dime as Karmic retribution.

    --
    sig wig dig jig rig big mig fig gig higg rig pig tig zig
  18. Printmaking by Dibson · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've just begun doing some printmaking at home. Doing linocuts and printing them by hand on paper. Just looking up information, I found Escher did this as well. Certainly an artistic figure many geek-types have taken to.

    It's not difficult or expensive to do (all you need is the linoleum, some blades, a brayer and ink), but I find that many traits good coders have apply well to it (like everything, right? Also think design/typography). I find it a satisfying after a day of programming.

    --
    -- Why keep us waiting? We are not made of time.
  19. Musician by hoggoth · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's not tech, but I bet a lot of geek minds that are attracted to programming languages are also attracted to the languages of music.

    Also designing and building musical instruments would be pretty geeky even in the 16th century.

    --
    - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
  20. Bee Keeping by cpuffer_hammer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It is not so different,
    Boxes with cards, become supers with frames.
    It is in some ways the an early nano-tech with thousands of simple machines carrying out tasks that create something much larger than any of them will understand.
    There are even bugs like Varroa Destructor that can make your hive crash.
    There is even over clocking, some people build hives with two queens (colonies of bees) in the same box, or would that be multi-processing.
    It is a bit like the free software community there is more to be gained by sharing idea with other bee keepers than can ever be gained by keeping ideas to your self.

    Well it is fun and you get sweet stuff to share with people.

  21. Sailing by magefile · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Lots of room there for tinkering if you want. Adjust/add/remove/replace pulleys, change how tight the outhaul and other ropes are, sand or otherwise modify your centerboard or daggerboard ... all sortsa fun stuff!

  22. accounting and moneylending by utopia27 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...I've been learning the use (though not the spelling) of abacus and slide rule - true archaotech. Slide rules are likely to go the way of the dodo Real Soon Now (TM). As a math nerd, I'm also learning the theory - I can build one better than I can use one. A computerized emulator (ironic, no?) is available at: http://www.techweb.rfa.org/index.php?option=conten t&task=view&id=86&Itemid=114&limit=1&limitstart=3

    I've done duty occasionally as an accountant/treasurer for various organizations, as well as property manager/stockist for several businesses. Bean counters have always been in demand.

    I've done a fair trade on e-bay selling painted tabletop miniatures (toy soldiers). I'm pretty sure working full time I could have gotten on as an artisan - pottery decoration? illuminator?

    Last but not least, I can carry a tune on about four or five woodwinds (sax, flute, recorder, tin whistle, little bit of clarinet). I'm not sure if I could've made it as an itinerant musician (maybe associated with a theater troupe), but it almost certainly would've appealed more than scratch farming.

    All taken together, I'd bet on bean counter, though maybe travelling merchant..

  23. Geeks have always been around by bursch-X · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm pretty sure many would get into clocks, clockworks, automats and mechanical toys.

    There's been a long geek tradition with making automats and mechanical toys, and funny enough the Japanese in the Edo period (1600 onwards) were really good at that stuff, because "inventions" were not allowed in that era. The feudal lords were afraid "inventions" could be used against them, so only fun automats ("karakuri ningyo" etc.) were considered harmless enough, that people were allowed to "invent" if it was for mechanical toys and automats. This started a real boom of the production of ever more amazing geek gadgets.

    --
    There are two rules for success:
    1. Never tell everything you know.
  24. ...And Farming by breadbot · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There is no end to the invention you can pour into growing plants and taking care of animals.

    Being not very far descended from farmers, I have to say that agriculture of any kind is a great target for creativity. And a couple of centuries ago, a heck of a lot of the world's population was subsistence farming.

    You have to plan for the seasons, account for risks (weather, sickness), do more with less effort, take care of your tools and your land, preserve foods, try to maintain nutrition through a long winter. Some of it you can figure out on your own, and some of it you really need to learn from those who have gone before you ...

    ... But I digress. Farming rewards intelligence and hard work. And it punishes stupidity and sloth with just about the stiffest penalties I can think of -- starvation of not just yourself, but your family as well. Darwin's hand at work, shaping the geeks of today over millenia past.

  25. SCA of course by obeythefist · · Score: 3, Informative

    A lot of "geeks" I know are all members of the SCA. SCA arts and sciences encompass a wide range of reasonably geeky activities, including but not limited to brewing beer, smithing armour and weapons, leatherworking, costuming, fighting in armour, archery and so on.

    A large amount of effort and detail is put into the crafting of authentic armour and weaponry, and the enthusiasm and energy dedicated to these tasks often exclude the demands of a more normal, healthy lifestyle, thus making these a small part of larger geekdom.

    --
    I am government man, come from the government. The government has sent me. -- G.I.R.
  26. Engineering and Mathematics by dutky · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Both engineering and mathematics are ancient disciplines, with origins dating back almost as far as written history itself. The ancient Babylonians, Sumerians and Egyptians were aware of mathematics to the extent that they were able to contruct mathematical proofs for the same geometric theorems that we all learned in high school. These same cultures obviously had a superb understanding of engineering in order to be able to build monumental architechture that stood for millenia, all without the benefit algebra or decimal arithmetic (much less, calculus).

    There is no reason to think that the sorts of folks that became engineers or mathematicians 5000 years ago were, tempermentally, any differnt from the sorts of folks that become engineers or mathematicians today.

    There were, no doubt, other highly skilled and technical professions that would have attracted ancient geeks: other's have mentioned smithing, scribing is another possability (just being literate enough to read and write was analogous to the general level of education of most geeks today), as is accountancy (conducting simple arithmetic without the benefit of decimal numbers must have required great patience and dedication). In the far east, at least since about 200 B.C., there was a good chance that anyone with reasonable education would have become a government functionary under the Confucian civil service system. I also suspect that, in other times, when people's conception of the world was very different from ours, many geeks may have gone into fields that would seem highly esoteric by modern standards: ancient geeks may have become musicians, artists, poets or monks as a means of persuing the life of the mind.

    Finally, we should recognize the uncomfortable fact that most ancient geeks probably never got the opportunity to persue any career whatsoever. Throughout most of history, most people, no matter what their personal interests or inate abilities, were destined to be peasant farmers, servants, slaves or other bondsmen, like their fathers and grandfathers and so on. The idea that people, no matter what their station by birth, should be able (or even required) to choose their path in life, is a thoroughly modern concept.

  27. Railroading... by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Between my first job and my second job, I spent a summer in a railroad museum in Vermont, where I touched to many rail trades, from painting old cars to firing a steam engine. If ever I was sent 100 years in the past, I'll go working on the railroad...

  28. Pillars of the Earth by hlee · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Recently read "Pillars of the Earth" by Ken Follet. Fantastic story, not to mention a wealth of detail on the architecture and building of cathedrals in 12th century England.

    If you think you life is tough now, this book will open your eyes on how hard life used to be the past few thousand years.

  29. They struggled to survive, like everybody else. by nerdup · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A hundred or a thousand years ago, large portions of the population didn't have time to sit at their desks and play around with "hobbies". If your entire waking life is spent trying to scrape a living out of semi-fertile ground on one leg because you lost the other one to infection after dropping a rock on your toe, your options for being a geek are limited. SCA fantasies notwithstanding, if you lived in the middle ages it didn't matter how smart or creative you were if you were born to the wrong parents. If you had a brain for math and logic, you would be free to think about such things while digging up weeds, but applying them to any sort of nerdy pursuit was way beyond the means of your average (read: non-noble) person.

    It's only in the last hundred or so years that our technology and standard of living has allowed non-wealthy people to fulfil their potential regarding intellectual pursuits. Asking what "nerds" did before there were computers and high technology is like asking what fighter pilots did before there were planes... they worked at normal jobs trying to survive, just like everybody else.

  30. How to find water the ancient Roman way: by crazyphilman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Ok, this is from a thousand-year old Roman engineering textbook I perused many years ago.

    One of the first things a Roman engineer would do on any building site is locate a spring to supply him with water. In order to do this, the engineer would get up before sunrise and lie down on the top of a hill, facing downhill. As the sun rose, tendrils of mist would appear in certain places on the ground. The engineer would note their location, and he would dig in those spots to produce a water supply.

    The reason this works? The mist appears where the water table is closer to the surface. By digging, you go below the water table, and the hole will naturally fill up with water over time. This water can be filtered and used.

    Isn't that neat?

    --
    Farewell! It's been a fine buncha years!
  31. Making my own joghurt by Muhammar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A galon of a good-quality milk + few spoons of good powdered or condenzed milk is heated close to boil (without actualy boiling it), the mix is cooled to amibient temperature, a favorite joghurt (few spoons) is stirred in and the mix is left under lose lid in a warm quiet place without disturbance for several days until ready.

    Basicaly it's as simple as making your own kids but less fun.

    --
    I doubt that we will ever figure out - and I suspect that even if we did figure out we couldn't do much about it
  32. Lots of stuff by wjeff · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Traditional boat building (in several forms), traditional boat sailing while using non-electronically aided navigation techniques, blacksmithing, leatherwork, sewing and furniture making. These are skills I probably could have made a living with in an earlier age. Probably would have been relatively happy doing it too.

    --
    my old sig is obsolete, and I haven't come up with a stupid enough new one yet
  33. 80 BC: The Antikythera celestial navigation device by obiwan2u · · Score: 4, Informative

    What were engineers doing over 2k years ago? How about building the Antikythera Mechanism (web copy of a June 1959 Scientific American article, p60-7)

    An amazingly complex, intricate, and accurate mechanical astronomical calculation device from 80 BC. Found in a shipwreck in 1900, and not fully reverse engineered until 1973, there are no other examples of this level technology in the ancient world.

    "It is hard to exaggerate the singularity of this device, or its importance in forcing a complete re-evaluation of what had been believed about technology in the ancient world. For this box contained some 32 [brass] gears, assembled into a mechanism that accurately reproduced the motion of the sun and the moon against the background of fixed stars, with a differential [gear] giving their relative position and hence the phases of the moon."

    You can see a reconstructed version of the Antikythera Mechanism here. Another article detailing the probable creation date of the device based on the construction of the gears can be found here"

    ..it was more sophisticated than anything like it until the Eighteenth Century, nearly two thousand years later!"

    Another article makes the conjecture that ancient navigators could have used the Antikythera Mechanism to determine longitude via the position of the moon (1800 years before longitude calculation was perfected in England)

    Ben in DC
    --
    Ben in DC
    "It's the mark of an educated mind to be moved by statistics" Oscar Wilde
  34. All very true by jd · · Score: 4, Interesting
    "Classical Education" (based on Greek ideas, reinvented during the reneissance) follows the idea of mixing arts and sciences, and it is from such a system that we let Leonardo Da Vinci, Sir Isaac Newton (a concert pianist, alchemist, and inventer of the cat flap), and others.


    These people, in Renessance times, were typically sponsored by rich patrons, who took care of the mundane needs whilst they got on with inventing or whatever. It made for a society that evolved culturally and technologically faster than anything that had preceeded it.


    Geeks would likely also have been explorers - it is very likely that St. Brenden "The Navigator" (who sailed from Ireland to Newfoundland in about 600 AD in a leather dinghy) was a geek at heart. There was a lot to discover, and required a mind agile at problem-solving along with fantastic patience, as they would be doing a great deal of nothing much.


    You find hints of geekdom in gnostic and hellenistic thought and religion, suggesting early geeks may have been heavy into religion. Again, no great surprise - geeks love answering things, and for a long time, those were the best answers anyone could devise.


    Cave painters may well have been geeks, too. One set of cave paintings in England would have been a few hundred feet under an ice sheet at the time they were painted. Someone shimmied down an ice crevice for the sole purpose of dawbing animals that couldn't possibly have existed there on the walls. That guy was NOT normal.


    Brewers, throughout history, have experimented with different sources of sugars, flavours, etc. Since wild yeast can take many forms, and since many ingredients would have been expensive, they would undoubtably have researched methods of sustaining the active ingredient in much the same way that modern kids brew their own "ginger beer plants" by splitting bottles and topping up with fresh ingredients to keep the yeast alive.


    The vertical loom and tablet weaving, both parts of Norse tradition, involved some highly complex thought and engineering on the part of their inventers and practicioners. Even the Viking longships - which would slide up beaches and could then be used to carry cargo from raids by reversing the oars - show considerable evidence of highly creative thought.


    I think it safe to say that geeks throughout history have been much as they are today, excpet maybe more influential, as many of the trades I've mentioned have had considerable status and power in their times.

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  35. Bowmaking and fletching by PGillingwater · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Choosing the right wood, shaping it, fletching the arrows. This is "ancient tech" which can be learned today, and is its own reward. Why, there are even courses in this available!

    It's amazing how effective a recurve bow with 40lbs strain is in the right hands....

    --
    Paul Gillingwater
    MBA, CISSP, CISM
  36. Metalcasting by Hadlock · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm melting Aluminum @ 1400 degrees F (ish) in a steel bucket lined with concrete to make sailing hardware. Oh, and I build my own wooden boats (another exercise in mathematics and logic). Both have been practiced for thousands of years, although I think they cast iron more often than aluminum "back in the day".

    --
    moox. for a new generation.
  37. Re:bullshit by BerntB · · Score: 2, Interesting
    that many Islamic scholars were studying and advancing mathematics.
    Read Bertrand Russell's A History of Western Philosophy.

    He claims the reason that the Islamic scholars didn't add that much to what they later transferred back to Europe, was that their religion stopped research.

    So this is another case that supports the grandparent's point.

    --
    Karma: Excellent (My Karma? I wish...:-( )
  38. Tech Support by Cheeze · · Score: 2, Funny

    Don't all good engineers start out in Tech support??

    tech: Hello sir, how may I help you?
    caveman: fire, BAD!!!
    tech: I understand your frustration, you'll need to restart your fire by hitting two stones together.
    caveman: FIRE, BAD!!!!!
    tech: Sir, you're going to have to work with me here.
    caveman: fire.........good?
    tech: Yes sir. Is there anything else I can do for you?
    caveman: UNF!

    --
    Why read the article when I can just make up a snap judgement?
  39. Try a diptych... by ferralis · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm working on building a replica of a medieval diptych... not the booklet style painting, but the medieval version of the PDA. Folded in half, these were often apparently the size of a palmtop. Using a string as a "gnomon" they make a pretty fair sundial too. With wax on the inside, suddenly they make a handy place to write important notes, etc. Given the properties of sundials, it's possible to approximate the date if you hold the thing level... and there are any number of games you can play with a pen and paper, stylus and wax work for them too. So, in short, a diptych (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diptych) is definitely the sort of thing a medieval geek would have to have... I can see the articles now: "Tic-tac-toe, the next killer app?"

    --
    Any generalization is a stupid one.
  40. Answer the question! by loose+canons · · Score: 2
    the mods have been promoting mostly answers that start with "if I were living X hundred years ago" and "the geeks of yore did W and Z". [and they are mostly interesting answers, I admit]. But the question is what DO you do?
    In fact, if you are an orthodox greenie or you are convinced that petroleum resources will dry up in the next decade, you SHOULD be DOING some low-tech nerdwork right now.
    Some things I do:
    • design passive solar heated housing: no electronics but some mechanical or hydraulic feed back to regulate temp from solar sources and earth/water heat sinks.
    • composting: i have been experimenting with staging anerobic and aerobic phases to speed up the breakdown [it still takes me 3 years to turn unsorted yard and kitchen wastes into a good garden product.]
    • design pedal powered mowing, earthmoving and transportation stuff...the bicycle, evolved as it is, is just a starting point.
    • study how to produce solar concentrators of high precision without recourse to computers, CNC machines etc. We all know how to make an elipse with 2 pins and a loop of string but I know how to make a parablola with pulleys, string and an xacto knife.
    • trying to figure out a sustainable tree and crop rotation pattern on marginal acreage that would support a family without motorized tilling and harvesting, using wood stoves for heat, in perpetuity on the minimum amount of land.
    • self regulating greenhouses to extend growing season in colder climates and without pesticides or pumped water.
    • low tech biological pest control. E.G. gypsy moths all but destroyed my oak trees 20 years ago but I found a few of the caterpillers were dying of some disease. I collected all the limp, sick ones I could find, waited until the fungus or bacteria that attacks them had turned them into little bags of pus, put them in a blender [the wife LOVED that!], filtered the product and sprayed it all over my property. To this day, even when the moths have denuded the trees in other parts of town, my trees fare well and the caterpillers are dying left and right. I need to study more so I can preserve the germs for use elsewhere.
    Being a geek would be so satisfying if i didn't have to make enough money to pay all that tuition!
    --
    You call that a troll? I have a whole beltway full of trolls better than that!
  41. Let's be realistic by TomorrowPlusX · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It seems -- and this may be somewhat cynical of me -- that an ancient geek would have had a life approximately like thus ( where the timeline is from pre-history up to, say, the 17th or 18th century:

    1) Born into violence, filth, and disease.
    2) Eek out a life of scavenging or farming, paying taxes to your lord, having some children, most of whom will die before a couple years old, until:
    3) war, or some other tribal/religious/cultural dispute.
    4) death at 20.

    This hypothetical geek from BCE 5000 or AD 1600 might have been the next Einstein, or Stephen Hawking, or anything we can imagine. But he'd never have had the time, opportunity or resources to do anything with it.

    We're NOT smarter than previous humans, we just have an *unprecendented* level of peace and prosperity. We have developed a culture where people have the opportunity *not* to toil and die at an early age.

    Finally, this success isn't evenly distributed, yet. A fair amount of humanity still lives the way our ancestors did centuries ago.

    --

    lorem ipsum, dolor sit amet
  42. Hahaha by marcus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You really don't know much about much about farming do you?

    Try blacksmithing when you don't control the fire or the availability of the quench water.

    How well do you handle different ores? Can you actually make a decent alloy from the dirt on the ground?

    Oh well, I'm still educating city kids.

    I did spend this last weekend with an axe and some trees. It's great whole body physical exercise, and beats meditation to smithereens as far as the ease of mental focus and achievement of Zen is concerned.

    --
    Good judgement comes from experience, and experience comes from bad judgement.
    - W. Wriston, former Citibank CEO
  43. The real answer... by LWATCDR · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They where blacksmiths, wheelwrights, coopers, or maybe weavers. I have read about people in the old west making sail wagons to try to ride across the plains. Put a sail on an old wagon? What a cool hack. Barbed wire or a mechanical reaper? Also way cool hacks. Even the Wright Brothers first plane was in effect a way cool hack.
    Back in the day you had to do cool hacks to survive. Hackers are not the descendants of court wizards. We are descendants of farmers that when one of his tools broke he would fix it with what he had on hand or make a different tool out of it.

    --
    See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
  44. There's a difference between Ancient and Medieval by Medievalist · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You need to study more history. In most ancient cultures smiths were mystical figures, who gave up much for their mastery.

    For example, an ancient goidelic bronze-smith's life was generally short and often ended in madness due to the lack of forced ventilation technology. The arsenic and heavy metals naturally occuring in ores acculumated in the body and induced illness and psychosis. Consequently the smiths were often unable to have normal children; so of course fathers did not want their daughters to marry smiths. A smith who wished to marry might have to steal or buy a bride.

    The inherited, rigidly defined social and occupational classes you're talking about are a feature of medieval and post-medieval (c.g. Renaissance and Modern) culture, and are very rare in truly ancient times. In ancient times fostering and apprenticeships were more the norm, and typically a smith chose his apprentices or fosterlings based on aptitude and ability.

  45. There are other similar societies, too. by Medievalist · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Markland, the Tuchux, the Norse Film and Pageantry Society, Acre, The Sealed Knot, Dagohir, Milites Normanorum, all do some kind of sword'n'axe type live combat recreation.

    Several of those listed above do "live steel" combat, with varying levels of realism and danger. SCA does stickfighting and fencing. Dagohir & its offshoots do padded sticks, Markland does live steel, padded sticks, and fencing.

    All require equipment which is easier (and more fun) to make than to purchase... lots of geeks are into it more for the craftsmanship than for the adrenaline rush.

  46. WRT naturalistically formed universe by anomaly · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You said:Fundamental Christians deny the vast level of supporting evidence for an ancient naturalistically formed Universe where life developed under the control of natural selection

    I would certainly be described as one of those "Fundamental" Christians, and I must respectfully take issue with your point.

    People who believe as I do do not deny the evidence. We collect evidence and draw inferences from it to see how that fits into our view of how the universe works. To be fair, this is precisely what naturalists do. We all share the same evidence. We differ in the meaning of the evidence and the explanations that accompany the evidence. Only a fool would reject solid evidence.

    You also said:Christianity seem to win the contest as 'religion most likely to stifle scientific advancement'

    I'll take issue with that as well. While it is true that many who claimed the name and power of the Christian church have abused that power and have done despicable things, that is not consistent with Christian beliefs. The list of Christians who have offered up significant scientific advances includes:
    Johann Kepler, Francis Bacon, Blaise Pascal, Robert Boyle, Charles Babbage, Samuel F. B. Morse, Gregor Mendel, Louis Pasteur, Henri Fabre, Lord William Thompson Kelvin, Joseph Lister, George Washington Carver, Wernher von Braun, and many others.

    To suggest that scientific advancement is inherently incompatible with Christianity is simply not inclusive of the facts.

    Look at the lobby groups now most opposed to stem cell research...

    Embryonic stem cell research is definitely opposed on moral grounds.

    Adult stem cell research - the area that shows therapeutic benefit TODAY is not morally out of bounds and is helping people to live a more healthy life. This is GOOD science, and should be promoted.

    Embryonic stem cell research is different. We believe that all human life is sacred and that no human should be killed to make life easier or healthier for someone else. The science shows that these zygotes are inherently human - that all that is required for a person to grow from a fertilized egg is food and shelter.

    Science's technological reach has exceeded its moral grasp in this area. Science has long existed in a realm where there were moral guidelines on appropriate research. e.g. People must know that they are part of an experiment, and what the risks are, etc. I feel strongly that one day, the conventional scientific wisdom will look on this and say 'oops' we messed that one up.

    FWIW - While I've not seen it written this way elsewhere, I rather like the idea of a "Fundamental Christian" over the moniker "fundamentalist" As a Fundamental Christian, I hold fast to the tenets of the historic Christian faith, which is somewhat different from the connotation of a fundie as described on /.

    Respectfully,
    Anomaly

    --
    But Herr Heisenberg, how does the electron know when I'm looking?
    1. Re:WRT naturalistically formed universe by Creepy+Crawler · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ---1. The existence and complexity of the universe

      Of course not. The universe was obviously created 5000 some years ago in a 7 day even in which the creator rested. ....Ok onto facts. There's a 3k background radiation that seems somewhat uneven in a honeycomb shape millions of ly wide. There's how many particles along with weird types of matter and energy. There's 4 forces, in which one is something on the range of 10^-30 as strong as magnetism, yet controls the orbits of the moons, planets, suns, galaxies, and even local superclusters of galaxies..

      Complex indeed. I want to discover WHY and literally become a god myself.

      ---2. The accuracy of the biblical record

      Ok, it makes it a good history, AS long as you can get the unassaulted "translations". Compare translations as "All your base are belong to us". Whats the quality, and how in the heck do you check?

      3. The evidence of the changed lives of the people who knew Jesus personally

      You personally know any of them? WHat evidence there was is corrupted by transcribing those very events no sooner than 60 years after He was murdered, bad translations, or just plain loosing the transcribed events.

      4. The evidence of the way that my relationship with Jesus Christ has changed my life.

      My relationship with myself has changed my life. Yes, I was a Catholic, and still believe in basic ideas.... I do not reject that a ultimate God exists, nor do I reject that Jesus did not live. I also believe that this God is not what people normally think, as in the holy angels flying and all that crap. If God exists, our univerrse exists as a particle in his body, or the way we exist outside of a computer emulating (in softwre) a device.

      I abide with the basic idea that we all hold the truth what we are, how to unleash that truth, and how to bring ourselves to godlike stature through eterenal death. A form of Buddho-Catholicism, if you will. I violate no commandments from the 10, and I abide by ethics that Shakyamuni and descendants have proposed that we follow.

      If this God many pray to actually listens, let him consider me on what I have accomplished and who I am, and NOT who I can offload "sins" to. Anybody can say "Forgive my sins, oh Lord, Jesus Christ" but whoever cannot conqueror problems of conscinousness mean nothing.

      ---I agree with you, and I think that IUDs and birth control pills are not morally acceptable because they are abortifacients.

      Let me ask you something from a totally different angle..

      Is it ok to kill a mammal (say, a great ape)? Why or why not?
      How much of a person is a "person"? If even one cell froma human is dropped, is that a lost 'life'?
      And to iterate a joke used by Cleese, "is every sperm sacred"? Why/why not?

      --
    2. Re:WRT naturalistically formed universe by Monty_Lovering · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As you're getting into this;

      "1. The existence and complexity of the universe"

      This is what I call the green hat paradox. Some religionists maintain that it is impossible the complexicty around arose without a designer. They cannot answer the question of where the complexity represented by that designer arose.

      It is like a man with a green hat saying you can't belive what someone is saying as they are wearing a green hat. The very insistance on a designer for complex systems invalidates their own belif as they cannot provide a designer for the complex ssytem that is their 'start conditon'.

      Political manuevering has resulted in the spawning of Intelligent Design. If anything ever cralwd out of the abortion bucket, it is ID. Talk about a oxymoron; it's a self-falsifying theory.

      "2. The accuracy of the biblical record"

      Like saying there was Global Flood when there is no evidence for it and direct evidence against it?

      "3. The evidence of the changed lives of the people who knew Jesus personally
      4. The evidence of the way that my relationship with Jesus Christ has changed my life."

      These claims are not unique, they are made by believers in the paranormal, by scientologists, by alien abductees, by healthfood fanatics, by reformed addicts, by other religonists outside of the Christian traditon. They just change who they give credit to.

      As for any internal proof, I'd recommend you learn more about auto-suggestion and dwell on the fact the shaman of a tribe of neolithic hunter-gatherers ALSO believes he is right because of his internalised experiences with the spirit being he believes in.

      You seem to base your opposition to abortion on the loss of POTENTIAL. What about the loss of potential for a woman who is not in a postion to raise a child? What about the loss of potential to children born in developing countries or to disadvantaged familes? How come the minute a baby is born all this talk about loss of potential goes away? The stance you have is niot consistant unless you take step to ensure the loss of potential is also prevented from happening once a child is born.

      However, unless you are able to counter evidence I presented in my other post to you (that there is no Biblical prohibition against abortion even though logically there would be if the writer had wanted there to be one), all you are doing is supporting a Pharasitical elaboration of Biblical law, and I'm sure you know what Jeus thought of the Pharasees.

      You say you are doing gods will, but I see no evidenece for it in this respect, so that even if one accepts the existence of god all you're doing is expressing a personal opinion you've copied of someone else, not a law that can be shown to be divinely inspired.
      I think the main problem with the abortion debate (other than it being approached from two different paradigms whose arguments are largely meaningless to each other) is that at 12 weeks gestation, whilst a baby is a tiny 2" long human being in appearance, that is where the similarity ends. In terms of neurologica complexity (the thing that arguably makes us human), there is no comparison.

      If cats had scales and long flicky tongues people would like them far less. They are cute and cuddly, even if they are totally self-centred couch parasites. Likewise, if 12 week-old fetuses had scales, or were still an amphorus blob, there just would not be the issue.

      Because it LOOKS like a tiny little human being, people think it is. But it isn't, not in any meaninful fashion, even when compared to a new-born.

    3. Re:WRT naturalistically formed universe by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Here's my take on things.

      The God(s)/God created PI. An infinite number of non repeating digits that describe the ratio of circle to an ever more perfect degree.

      Thus it could be argued that god(s)/God are really into doing things right up front.

      Hence the whole Adam and Eve creation myth is bunk because it's too much of a kludge for a god who's into elegant solutions.

      The big bang was an elegant solution. It was elegant because of the beauty of its simplicity.

      Evolution is an elegant solution. Going and creating all kinds of specialed creatures isn't how a God who thought up PI would do things. An elegant God who can think up an infinite number just has to have the one elegant thought and the rest just works itself out.

      --
      Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
  47. Caveman Chemistry by SteeldrivingJon · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Here's the site to check out:Caveman Chemistry

    Projects from making charcoal, mead, and ceramics to casting metals and glass, and making plastic (making and drawing polyester fiber).

    --
    September 2011: Looking for Cocoa/iOS work in Boston area Cocoa Programmer Quincy, MA
  48. Magic / Necromancy by SteeldrivingJon · · Score: 2, Funny

    Back in the medieval period, the educated people were the clerics, some ordained, some not.

    Problem was, there weren't enough good jobs for the educated class. There were many underemployed people with time on their hands and limited prospects.

    So they did what came naturally. Like we hack technology, they hacked theology.

    Much 'black magic' was based on the standard Catholic rite of exorcism. In the rite, the priest commands demons or the devil to leave, in the name of the father, son, and holy ghost, perhaps with other holy names thrown in for good measure.

    Some clerk must have seen that, and thought "What a waste! If you can command them, why not tell them to do something useful?"

    Thus, the idea that a sorceror could follow a similar ritual, and use the influence of the holy powers to command the spirits to bring wealth, or sex, or knowledge.

    Sort of like hacking a CueCat.

    --
    September 2011: Looking for Cocoa/iOS work in Boston area Cocoa Programmer Quincy, MA