Slashdot Mirror


Keeping a Data Center Cool on the Cheap

jedimaud writes "You've heard of bubble wrap, and the boy in the bubble -- now, here's a datacenter in a bubble. I work for a government agency that, like most, is trying to cut back some costs, and one of those costs is a REAL datacenter. So, we decided to wrap the whole thing in plastic (including two 1.5 ton ACs). The room hovers about 83 degrees, however, the racks in the bubble (ok, more like a termite tent) stay about 10 degree cooler. Here's some pics to check it out."

59 of 319 comments (clear)

  1. Wow... by Computer+Mutt · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now that's cool.

    1. Re:Wow... by sgant · · Score: 2, Funny

      What's the last thing you hear right before a site is totally slashdotted?

      Here's some pics to check it out.

      --

      "Leo Fender was in a 'state of grace' when he designed the Stratocaster." -- Paul Reed Smith
    2. Re:Wow... by rootofevil · · Score: 2, Funny

      if servers get slashdotted, and theres nobody around to hear, do they really melt?

      --
      turn up the jukebox and tell me a lie
  2. Hmmm by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well, if your site is hosted by that Data Center, it just got a lot hotter in that bubble!

    --
    Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    1. Re:Hmmm by nokilli · · Score: 2, Funny

      Timothy could post a dupe, and that would divide the heat by half, right?

  3. Wonder if... by ericdano · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wonder if the bubbles are working now that it's been SLASHDOTTED!!

    --
    It's either on the beat or off the beat, it's that easy.
    I moderate therefore I rule!
    --
    1. Re:Wonder if... by shawb · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think in this case the AC only has to work on pumping the excess heat from the servers out, and not cooling the whole room. Doesn't matter how warm the room gets outside of the bubbles.

      --
      I'll never make that mistake again, reading the experts' opinions. - Feynman
    2. Re:Wonder if... by devilspgd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sure it matters -- The bubble still needs to insulate and the AC still needs to dissipate, both of which are greatly affected by the heat difference inside and outside the bubble.

      --
      Give a man a fish, he'll eat for a day, but teach a man to phish...
    3. Re:Wonder if... by BK425 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sorry, I don't understand. Are you saying there's a server room with a (non pentium) heater going into it? I've never seen anything like that. I would imagine that if it's not on a seperate zone (ie it's own thermostat) you could just block the airflow from the furnace to that room and have an HVAC guy rebalance the airflow to other vents in the zone.
      But, I've never seen a room intended for servers, that had an actual furnace attached to it.

      Other posters on this thread have suggested that having datacenters in Siberia or Alaska might be a good idea. This is not new. Alaska advertises several secure datacenters that were started with public bonds. Uninteruptible power takes on a whole new meaning when you're within pipeline distance of a natural gas field and wire distance of a coal plant. And at least for the one that I read about the entire facility was normally heated from the heat stripped off the server spaces by airconditioning (heat pumps). Connecting a heater to a server room would be a bad idea imo.

  4. Warning: Suffocation risk by dangitman · · Score: 5, Funny

    Do not place datacenter over head. Keep out of reach of children.

    --
    ... and then they built the supercollider.
    1. Re:Warning: Suffocation risk by Mister+Impressive · · Score: 5, Funny

      Do not eat datacener.

      --
      Let the commencement BEGINULATE!
    2. Re:Warning: Suffocation risk by Knara · · Score: 4, Funny

      Do not taunt the happy datacenter

  5. Needs more duct tape... by tinrobot · · Score: 3, Funny

    Because... stuff always needs more duct tape.

    1. Re:Needs more duct tape... by Leroy_Brown242 · · Score: 4, Funny

      and more cowbell.

  6. Note from the metrology freak by Guppy06 · · Score: 5, Informative

    "(including two 1.5 ton ACs)"

    "Ton" here refers to a "ton of cooling," a measure of power. It was originally intended to mean "the power required to melt one ton of ice in 24 hours." Since that varies based on a bunch of conditions, it was pegged at 12,000 Btu/h.

    When they changed the definition of "calorie" to mean 4.1868 J, converting Celsius to Fahrenheit and grams to pounds gives us a conversion factor of 1 ton of cooling being exactly 3 516.852 842 066 7 W.

    In other words, each a/c unit is about 5.25 kW of cooling each, or 10.5 kW total.

    Oh, and 83 degrees Fahrenheit is about 301 kelvin and a ten-degree Fahrenheit difference is a difference of 6 kelvin.

    (According to my old HVAC prof, there's been little to no progress in "metricizing" the industry in the US. Having used both systems in his course, I'd say I prefer US units, if only because the unit descriptions on things like insulative properties make more sense when the units for thickness and area don't naturally cancel each other out.)

    (And it could be worse. Most home a/c units are labelled on the box as putting out x number of Btu, suggesting they're disposable.)

    (Well, they probably are...)

    1. Re:Note from the metrology freak by Solder+Fumes · · Score: 5, Funny

      That was entirely tangential and ultimately useless information that adds no value to this discussion. ...which means that it was perfect for Slashdot! Keep up the good work!

    2. Re:Note from the metrology freak by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      (including two 1.5 ton ACs)

      Hey, I may be a fat geek, but I'm not THAT fat!

    3. Re:Note from the metrology freak by Guppy06 · · Score: 4, Informative
      " but last time I checked, a nine degree Fahrenheit difference was a difference of five degrees Celsius,"

      ... which means 10 is 5 5/9, rounding up to 6. Guess I didn't use the word "about" enough times for you.

      But hey, if you really wanna get anal, do it right.

      "assuming that 273 K = 32 degF,"

      32 degrees Fahrenheit is 273.15 kelvin.

      "The temperatures chosen were freezing and boiling of water at 1 atm pressure, in case anyone didn't know."

      At 101 325 Pa, water boils at 373.124 kelvin. Celsius /= centigrade. The freezing point is also flakey, but not within three decimal places at least. This is why all modern temperature scales are pegged to the triple point (273.16 K)instead of trying to correlate two data points that move around with respect to each other.

      "The correct Fahrenheit boiling point of water (at 1 atm) is 212 degF.)"

      Try 211.953 degrees Fahrenheit.

      Oh, and the first letter of SI units (like kelvin) is never capitalized.

    4. Re:Note from the metrology freak by William+Robinson · · Score: 3, Funny

      He must be a consultant!!:)

    5. Re:Note from the metrology freak by Guppy06 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Eek, I wouldn't do that, ever."

      Then you're limiting you're usefulness in the workplace. Even if everything in the US (and exported to the US) was manufactured to SI specifications tomorrow, there's still older equipment to maintain. And if you refuse to figure out what size metric socket is needed to turn a 1/2-inch bolt because it's against your religion, that's one less application for HR to consider.

      "Me, I would fire every engineer who would not use the metric system for calculations."

      Straw man. I said in the sentence immediately before your selective quote that I used both in that particular course, just like just about every student in every engineering course in every US school.

      "but thing is, it works,"

      So do US units, to exactly the same degree. US units have been defined in terms of SI units since the Nineteenth Century.

      The difference is in application. SI units tend to be tied to certain hidebound rules of use and stigmas that aren't attached to US units.

      Power is always measured in watts, whether we're talking about cooling capacity or electricity. So does this mean if I plug a 5.25 kW air-conditioner into the wall that it will pull 5.25 kJ of heat out of the air per second, or that it will consume 5.25 kJ of electricity per second, or (even worse) both? In the US, you're allowed to use tons for cooling capacity even while still using watts for electrical power.

      SI requires you to measure energy transfer per second, even if you're more interested in hours or days (which you are in HVAC). SI requires you to always use meters instead of centimeters in unit definitions (and cancel when able), leaving you with ambiguous units like "watt per meter-kelvin" instead of "btu-inch per hour-square foot-degree Rankine." When you're dealing with wall areas and insulation thicknesses and analyzing the heating and cooling requirements of a room over the course of hours, it's actually less work to use US units than SI units because of all the rules BIPM churns out on the proper use of SI.

      "Very many troubles can be escaped this way."

      Others are introduced by the insistence on one set of units over another. Was the Mars Orbiter lost because the manufacturer didn't use SI, or was it lost because NASA insisted on SI when every other customer in the aerospace industry insists on US units? The civillian world does things like measure airplane altitudes in units of 30.48 cm and ships cargo in containers 12.192 m in length because demanding that everything be done in SI would cause "very many troubles."

      SI vs US is ultimately arbitrary. Both have advantages and disadvantages. But demanding that everybody in the world use SI in all instances involves as much hubris as demanding everybody in the world speak English in all instances.

    6. Re:Note from the metrology freak by bbtom · · Score: 3, Funny

      Too knowledgable for consulting. Probably an academic.

      --
      catch (HumourFailureException e) { e.user.send("You, sir, are a humourless idiot."); }
  7. Real Data Center by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 4, Informative

    First off, a "real" data center needs a little more than 1.5 Tons of cooling; that will barely cool a single rack in a real data center.

    Insulation is always a nice idea, be the fact of the matter is that to reject the heat from the space you need to provide a means of heat trasnfer. Generally, that requires a temperature differential between your heat source and the outside. If it is cooler outside than in the space, not much is required. If it is warmer, you will have to take advantage of thermodynamics and use a compressorized cycle. This can be more or less efficient, depending on the difference in inside and outside temperatures.

    (A typical data center operates with a 95-110F outside design temperature, and attempts to deliver 48F chilled water to the CRAC units (Computer Room Air Conditioning). This forces about 50% of the energy consumed by the computers to be used (again) to cool the equipment.)

    Call an engineer when everything melts down...

    1. Re:Real Data Center by Craigj0 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      First off, a "real" data center needs a little more than 1.5 Tons of cooling
      I'm pretty sure 3 (2x1.5) is considered a little more than 1.5 but perhaps I'm not using "real" math.

  8. Damn... by eldawg · · Score: 2, Funny

    I doubt anyone had a chance to cache these pics.

    1. Re:Damn... by Adrilla · · Score: 3, Informative
      --

      "Plans are for fools! Oglethorpe, the plutonian (Aqua Teen Hunger Force)
  9. Tax money... by loony · · Score: 2, Funny

    At least now I know where my tax money went! Termite tents! That's at least more believable than that $15,000 toilet seat and $20,000 hammer :-)

    Peter.

  10. Really a good idea? by novalogic · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If that A/C unit freezes up/dies/etc, getting wraped in that bubble will cause those machines to overheat rather quickly...

    Might be a good idea to hookup a tempature controlled moter to pull the plastic down if the A/C dies, if you know how, and have a good junk pile, you can do that cheap enough....

    --
    --
    1. Re:Really a good idea? by HermanAB · · Score: 3, Funny

      Actually the takedown of the tents is automatic: When the computers overheat, the plastic will slump and drop onto the floor...

      --
      Oh well, what the hell...
  11. Build the datacenter in alaska by team99parody · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Clean dry cold air. Self sufficient oil. Great physical security

    1. Re:Build the datacenter in alaska by Solder+Fumes · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Heck, why not? Run some massive fiber along the big pipeline. Only disadvantage is that you're out on the edge of the Internet, you're not safely embedded in the middle with nice redundant capabilities.

    2. Re:Build the datacenter in alaska by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Excuse me, do you run a datacenter for a living?

      When you are running a mission critical datacenter (this is usually all of them, if we are talking about real datacenters here, not the closet of your 5000 square foot PC repair shop where you keep your web server), you have supplies to get you through any length of power outages. This usually includes supplies of diesel fuel and a contract with a fuel supplier to bring more diesel on site for the duration of the outage.

      Do you have any clue how major datacenters in metropolitian USA are run? You don't depend on the reliability of the grid to determine how to budget power systems for your datacenter.

      -AC with a clue

    3. Re:Build the datacenter in alaska by TheFlyingGoat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Build it in a basement with a good vapor barrier. To make it more efficient to cool, use a cooling system that makes use of a ground loop of coolant. They're extremely efficient and not too expensive.

      Without the a/c on, my basement hovers around 68 degrees throughout the year. It's much easier to control the temperature than elsewhere in the house. With a way to actively dissipate heat (the ground loop), it'd be the ideal datacenter location without having to man a post in Alaska. :)

      --
      You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life. --Winston Churchill
    4. Re:Build the datacenter in alaska by kfg · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Hey, how come we're down?"

      "Don't know. Must be a caribou in the works."

      (And when they track it down I want to see them tape that to an index card)

      KFG

    5. Re:Build the datacenter in alaska by atarione · · Score: 4, Funny

      the real problem with a data center in alaska is that the fucking polar bears will keep drinking all the cherry coke.

      --
      actually I am happy to see you, however that is in fact a banana in my pocket.
    6. Re:Build the datacenter in alaska by kingofalaska · · Score: 2, Informative
      That depends on where in Alaska.

      Right now, in south central Alaska, it is 50 degrees outside. It was in the 80's earlier. I have worked on projects all over Alaska, and it gets hot and humid in the Brooks Range and Fairbanks areas, then drops to -40 for weeks at a time in the winter. Other areas are milder, but humid. I read that Anchorage is one of the sweatiest areas of the U.S., and I'm glad I don't live there. But it is Bikini season here, a ways north.

      As for the 'self-sufficient oil', most of our oil is sent to the small states, and we supply 25% of the U.S. oil consumption. OTOH, we have vast supplies of untapped gas, coal, and radioactive materials.

      And 'physical security'? Better look at a map. Alaska is not a small island off the coast of California. It's the air crossroads of the world, and within spitting distance of Siberia. It is the only part of the U.S. to be occupied by enemy forces during WWII. Of course, everyones grandma has a gun, and knows how to use it. And we have the greatest concentration of veterans of all the states. I pity the fool who attacks Alaska.

      KoA

      Navy to Test Shape Shifting Catamaran in Alaska

  12. What's that sound? by Ethon · · Score: 2, Funny

    Did anyone else just hear a popping sound?

  13. It's misleading by SamMichaels · · Score: 4, Insightful

    1.5 ton sounds expensive, big and awe-inspiring. It's not. Most people have cheap 1 ton a/c units in their living room walls (12,000 btu). My 12,000 (1 ton) unit is barely able to cool 3 computers. Good luck with a datacenter.

    1. Re:It's misleading by TheFlyingGoat · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Your 3 computers must be built with awful components. At my former employer we were keeping the entire server room cool with a $200 window air conditioner. The server room had 2 HP servers, a handful of 1U IBM x336 servers, 3 workstations, 2 racks of networking equipment, and a variety of other smaller devices. The window unit ran about once an hour for 5 minutes in 85 degree weather and kept the room sufficiently cool.

      The key is to move your UPS out of the temperature controlled area, since that's the biggest source of heat in most server rooms. Then we were gradually replacing the multitude of old HP servers with the IBM servers. Each IBM could to the work of 4 HP's easily, and ran much cooler than a single HP.

      Your 3 computers must be running 1000+ watt power supplies, multiple 6800 vid cards, and a ton of hard drives if your home a/c is having trouble cooling that room.

      --
      You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life. --Winston Churchill
    2. Re:It's misleading by drmerope · · Score: 4, Informative

      No offense, but maybe you missed the point?

      The article was entitled "Keeping a Data Center Cool _on the Cheap_" (emphasis added)

      The suggestion being that they were able to significantly cut back on the size and power consumption of the cooling plant by using plastic wrap.

  14. this doesn't work... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    keeping a datacenter cool? Thats nothing..

    try moving to india to try and get your job back from dell only to get dysintry and heat stroke, lose your wallet and end up working in low grade indian miget porno to get enough money to buy a can of coke, only to get typhode.

    Bubbles...pfff...

    Ps. I'm writing this from Iran, send help.

  15. Better yet by Mr_Icon · · Score: 3, Funny

    You want cool and cheap? Move your datacenter to the North of Siberia.

    --
    If you open yourself to the foo, You and foo become one.
  16. yes. by testednegative · · Score: 2, Informative

    its been said before, but for the sake of trying.

    PLEASE POST PIC/MOVIE THREADS WITH CORAL MIRRORS OR MIRRORDOT MIRRORS OR A MIRROR OF A KIND.

    partial thumbnail pics only mirror here:
    http://mirrordot.org/stories/e90ad5cab7cfb4869cc0f 7bbfed3ed64/index.html

  17. You should be using Pentium M - based computers... by Harry+Balls · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...like we do.

    25 watts per CPU, 50 watts per system.
    Period.

  18. i can see the call from ready.gov on monday by atarione · · Score: 2, Funny

    hey have you guys seen our ductape and plastic sheets?

    --
    actually I am happy to see you, however that is in fact a banana in my pocket.
  19. Heh, great minds think alike! by pla · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Having recently faced a similar problem (though on a much smaller scale), we came up with almost the same solution.

    As one suggestion, though, cardboard (in 4x8ft sheets) proved a lot easier to work with than plastic sheets. For starters, the plastic requires attachment at the ceiling, and will eventually come loose under its own weight; cardboard, with a single fold in the sheet, will stand upright and support its own weight for years, assuming not too high of a humidity level. For another, cardboard won't flap around and potentially block air intakes nearly so easily as plastic will.

    Believe it or not, though, what we found the most effective way to make use of barely adequate AC - Don't treat the room as a closed system. You've basically used the plastic sheets to build giant chimneys - Now take advantage of that fact, and along with a high volume fan above each rack, just exhaust the air at the top outside rather than recycle it back into the room... Think of it this way... You spec your cooling to work to perhaps 110F ambient, right? At the top of a full rack, with 50-60F going in the bottom, you probably have 120-130F going out the top. Does it take more work to cool 130F, or 110F, back to 50F? Not to mention, your normal ambient shouldn't come anywhere near 110F...

  20. Note from the Entomology freak by morcheeba · · Score: 4, Funny

    "(more like a termite tent)"

    "Most termite species are tropical or subtropical, but a few live in temperate regions." I'd posit that even fewer live in a properly cooled data center. So, on the surface (no pun intended), this doesn't seem to be a good comparison.

    But reading further into the Wikipedia article: "Termites have biting mouthparts and are soft-bodied, of moderate to small size. They live in dark nests and tunnels, except when the winged alates emerge to leave their parent colony." When comparing termites to geeks, they both seem to have biting mouth parts and the geeks are definitely soft-bodied. And of smaller size. And, like the termites, true geeks live in their parent's basement.

    "Termites cannot themselves digest the wood that they consume." Few geeks can live on chewed-up pencils. So again, another similarity.

    Lastly, Termites construct extremely large and elaborate mounds to house their colonies. ... The internal structure of these mounds can be quite complex, with ventilation chimneys for active temperature control" Need I say more?!

  21. -Government- Datacenter... by Scott+Swezey · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't get all of the attacks about this not being a "real datacenter." Sure, I wouldn't want any of my things run from his DC, but he did say that it was a government datacenter on a budget... Surely all of us have dealt with cheap government / school people at some time who refuse to put money where its needed.

    --
    Scott Swezey
  22. Thats a wrap! by Doctrinal+Enforcer · · Score: 2, Funny

    Big bubbles no troubles.

    --
    VERITAS VOS LIBERABIT
  23. This is not about AC... by KlaymenDK · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...it's about load testing his data center!

    "Here's some pics to check it out." ?? Dead giveaway!

  24. what about ducts? by adrianmonk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've thought about alternate methods for keeping computers cool, and I started to wonder about just feeding cold air directly into the intake of the computer itself, rather than trying to surround the whole computer with cold air. Then the computer's hot air output is not polluting your cold air with hot.

    What I had in mind is a sort of a system that would supply cold air through ducts (similar to the tubes that are used for hot air exhaust on a clothes dryer) at positive pressure. It'd then be a matter of just hooking these up to your fan intakes on the computer, and you'd have very cold air flowing straight through the system.

    One could easily supply the required cold air through ducts by putting a big cardboard box (or wooden box, etc., etc.) on the front of a window unit, then cutting holes and attaching hoses where required.

    I've wondered if anyone has tried something like this. The disadvantage is that you have to run new ducts every time you install a piece of new equipment. The advantage is that the computers are being fed with cold air directly after it passes through the air conditioner's evaporator coil while it's still cold, instead of reaching the computers after it has had a chance to mix with hot air in the room. Kind of like standing right under the A/C vent when you go indoors on a really hot summer day.

  25. Re:I'd fire anyone... by masklinn · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Wrong, units are not mere tools, they're communication tools, and the most important is not to be familiar with the communication tools it's that everyone is able to use&understand them. The efficiency of a communication tool comes from the quality and reliability of the communication it provides.

    metric is the standardised universal way to communicate, hence the tool to use.

    Just as english is currently the standardized and *mostly* universal communication language and should therefore be used whenever avaible.

    --
    "The way we can tell it's C# instead of Haskell is because it's nine lines instead of two." -- wadler
  26. 1.5 ton Anonymous Cowards? by allanj · · Score: 2, Funny

    "two 1.5 ton AC"

    I know that lots of geeks tend to gain weight, but those are big Anonymous Cowards!

    --
    Black holes are where God divided by zero
  27. one small mistake: by hummassa · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Kelvin is capitalized to differentiate it from kilo.

    --
    It's better to be the foot on the boot than the face on the pavement. ~~ tkx Kadin2048
    1. Re:one small mistake: by Guppy06 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The abbreviations of units based on proper names (K, J, W, N) are capitalized, but when spelled out they start with a lower-case letter (kelvin, joule, watt, newton).

    2. Re:one small mistake: by wizardhat · · Score: 2, Funny

      Look at any Seagate product specification page.

  28. Don't try this in YOUR datacenter. by deacon · · Score: 5, Funny
    Hey Kids!

    Ever wonder why computers are made of metal? Why the plastic pieces are made of plastics that meet flammability performance standards?

    Tiny Tim raises his hand

    Yes, Tiny Tim?

    Please, Mr Deacon Sir, so that if some source of ignition is present, the computer does not turn into a fireball spewing deadly poisionous smoke, Sir!

    Very Good, Tiny Tim. And what happens if someone hangs up huge sheets of generic, flammable plastic in an area with lots of potential ignition sources?

    Please, Mr Deacon Sir, sooner or later it catches fire, and people die. If these boneheads are lucky, Sir, someone from the Building Facilities or the Building Inspector will see this website and make them take it down, Sir.

    Very good, Tiny Tim. The rest of the class is to read up on Flammability.

  29. Re:Hello, Mr. Fire Marshall. by iggymanz · · Score: 2, Funny

    heh, the plastic folks maybe weren't acquainted with Mr. OSHA and Mr. Confined Space and Mr. Oxygen Deficency Hazard, so adding Mr. Fire Marshall to the list of ignored people isn't a big step.

  30. cool? its a bit amatuer. by museumpeace · · Score: 2, Informative

    Starting at HP labs, Ratnesh Sharma began work on the problem of cooling server farms two years ago.
    Then work with the university of Virginia evolved from that research. Finally, in work done with Duke U. it paid off in the form of software tools that were reported at Usenix'05 [you can ignore password pop-up if you go thru the google cache] as saving 25% of cooling costs, thats can be over $1000000/year for large data centers by dynamically distributing work load to machines that are running cooler by using temperature data as input to the load balancer. [if you can get at the usenix art., Duke has basically the same paper on line. Or just read the the Usenix abstract]

    --
    SLASHDOT: news for people who can't concentrate on work or have no life at all and got tired of yelling back at the TV.