Slashdot Mirror


Weather Radar Case Mod

Bill Kendrick writes "What do you get when you take a laptop LCD, a Mini-ITX case and an old marine weather radar? A self contained wireless weather radar PC appliance!" And No, it's not just squeezing a motherboard into an object smaller than that motherboard -- this is a functional weather-watching device.

109 comments

  1. Slick + full mirror by winkydink · · Score: 4, Informative

    Cool!

    All I can say is some people have a lot more free time on their hands than I do.

    Full mirror here.

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    1. Re:Slick + full mirror by whitehatlurker · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Thanks. Site was /.'ed after your comment was posted.

      --
      .. paranoid crackpot leftover from the days of Amiga.
    2. Re:Slick + full mirror by TubeSteak · · Score: 4, Informative
      lol
      In Case of Slashdotting, Break Mirror

      The only problem is that mirrornetwork didn't change all the image links. so they're still dead :o\

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    3. Re:Slick + full mirror by winkydink · · Score: 1

      We only mirror the actual content pages, not stuff linked off them. So, if you want to see the full-size pics, you'll have to wait for the slashdotting to subside. Sorry.

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    4. Re:Slick + full mirror by johndierks · · Score: 1

      This is exactly the kind of page I bookmark and read three weeks from now when I clean out my bookmarks again.

    5. Re:Slick + full mirror by HyperChicken · · Score: 1

      lol
      In Case of Slashdotting, Break Mirror


      A phrase he stole from this post and this user (check the sig). Both pre-date the domains registration.

      And now he's trying to make some money off it. Pathetic.

      --
      Free of Flash! Free of Flash!
    6. Re:Slick + full mirror by winkydink · · Score: 1

      Dude. Get your facts straight. When you change your sig. I changes all of your posts, past and present.

      As the FAQ on the site says, the ads don't even cover the cost of hosting.

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    7. Re:Slick + full mirror by HyperChicken · · Score: 1

      The sig was quoted here: http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=143326&cid=120 13412.

      That was in March, before you signed up for the domain. (Isn't Google amazing?)

      --
      Free of Flash! Free of Flash!
    8. Re:Slick + full mirror by winkydink · · Score: 1

      The site was beta tested from another domain prior to securing networkmirror.com.

      But do feel free to keep looking for consiracies where none exist.

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    9. Re:Slick + full mirror by HyperChicken · · Score: 1

      Really? What domain? Is there a verified cache with the quote that pre-dates the anonymous coward's post?

      --
      Free of Flash! Free of Flash!
    10. Re:Slick + full mirror by DAldredge · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Why in the hell does it matter?

    11. Re:Slick + full mirror by HyperChicken · · Score: 1

      It doesn't really matter. Although, at first, it was the combination that he was, more or less, taking credit for it (or at least not giving credit) AND, on top of that, attempting to scrap money from Slashdot. Mirrordot, which also has ads, isn't posting links on Slashdot trying to drive in traffic. He is.

      But now he's under my skin because he didn't just come out and say "Yeah, I used it, so what?". He's all "Dude, no, no. See, he stole it from me! I mean, sigs can be changed, right?" It's not so much that he stole it ('using it' would be a better phrase), it's that he's lying about it.

      --
      Free of Flash! Free of Flash!
    12. Re:Slick + full mirror by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      /. has next to no original content and runs ads. Why not bitch about /. too?

    13. Re:Slick + full mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What do you get when you take a laptop LCD, a Mini-ITX case and an old marine weather radar?

      I don't know, a machine that can't handle the /. traffic?

    14. Re:Slick + full mirror by HyperChicken · · Score: 1

      I'd rather bitch about the original content than the unoriginal content.

      However, you don't see Slashdot posting around the net saying "Look at me, look at me!". He could have gone the Mirrordot way, tried to create a good service, and then let word-of-mouth do the rest, but he's not. He's trying to draw attention to himself. This is like trying to get high pagerank on Google or signing up for "Hotmale.com". It's low.

      --
      Free of Flash! Free of Flash!
    15. Re:Slick + full mirror by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      When /. first started it used such methods to get people to come to /.

      Why don't you just mark him as a foe so you don't have to see his posts?

    16. Re:Slick + full mirror by HyperChicken · · Score: 1

      Why don't you just mark him as a foe so you don't have to see his posts?

      How is that fun?

      Why doesn't he just admit he didn't create the phrase?

      --
      Free of Flash! Free of Flash!
    17. Re:Slick + full mirror by winkydink · · Score: 1

      Because I believes I did.

      Or to be more correct, I believe I arrived at it independently.

      Who invented the integrated circuit? Shockley or Kilby?

      Is it that difficult for you to grasp that two people could independently arrive at the same twist of "In case of fire, break glass?"

      Those who can, do. Those who can't whine and complain on Slashdot about those who can.

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    18. Re:Slick + full mirror by winkydink · · Score: 1

      s/Shockley/Noyce/

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    19. Re:Slick + full mirror by HyperChicken · · Score: 1

      Of course you did. I mean, your hearsay completely destroys the solid proof of prior work I have shown.

      And then why wouldn't you have just said this to begin with? Instead, you got extermely defensive, claiming a sig was changed. Not exactly a sign of truth.

      --
      Free of Flash! Free of Flash!
    20. Re:Slick + full mirror by winkydink · · Score: 1

      I saw the sig you reference from Broke Mirror for the first time on a posting about Google Video. Which gave me some pause. I then looked at the posting history. When I saw that some posts with the sig predated networkmirror, I assumed (incorrectly) that Broke Mirror had changed the sig at a later point in time.

      It's clear there'll be no convincing you otherwise, and to be honest, I don't even know why I'm bothering (other than its a slow afternoon at the office). This is the last posting I'll make on this subject.

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    21. Re:Slick + full mirror by HyperChicken · · Score: 1

      Just to wrap up, according to winkydinky, hearsay is greater than evidence. Foolish, I know.

      --
      Free of Flash! Free of Flash!
    22. Re:Slick + full mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who the fuck cares?

      You're obviously the other account as well, looking to protect your claim to /. "fame".

      Loser.

    23. Re:Slick + full mirror by HyperChicken · · Score: 1

      Or, like anyone else can do, I just Google'd the phrase and pointed out the obvious.

      --
      Free of Flash! Free of Flash!
    24. Re:Slick + full mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have no original content and run ads for your corporate masters at Sun. I think everyone should bitch about you!

    25. Re:Slick + full mirror by DAldredge · · Score: 1

      I wish I had 'corporate masters' at Sun. If I did I would be able to get an Ultra 20 for next to nothing. :)

  2. Mirror Link by pyrrhonist · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Here's the nyud.net anit-slashdot-effect link:

    My Personal Weather Radar Project

    --
    Show me on the doll where his noodly appendage touched you.
  3. Size issues? by sczimme · · Score: 4, Funny


    And No, it's not just squeezing a motherboard into an object smaller than that motherboard (emphasis mine)

    And how would one do that, exactly (and ensure the board still worked)?

    --
    I want to drag this out as long as possible. Bring me my protractor.
    1. Re:Size issues? by winkydink · · Score: 1

      Personal (computer) lubricant

      --

      "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    2. Re:Size issues? by StuffJustHappens · · Score: 2, Funny

      Use gzip?

      --
      --What's this sig thing all about then? Should I have one?
    3. Re:Size issues? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      squeezing a motherboard into an object smaller than that motherboard
      And how would one do that, exactly

      The same way the Tardis works : by having the outside much further away than the inside. The inside is closer, so it only looks bigger.

    4. Re:Size issues? by LordoftheWoods · · Score: 1

      bzip2 may work even better..

    5. Re:Size issues? by Carnildo · · Score: 1

      There are usually a few millimeters of unused board around the edges. Those can be cut off (carefully!) to fit the board in.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    6. Re:Size issues? by PlasticMonkey · · Score: 1

      Size issues? A user id of winkydink? What's the world coming to?

      Haha, only joking Paul (you're scared now because I know your name... *cue spooky music* - congratulations on the geek of the day in may ;))

    7. Re:Size issues? by Council · · Score: 1
      And No, it's not just squeezing a motherboard into an object smaller than that motherboard (emphasis mine)

      And how would one do that, exactly (and ensure the board still worked)?

      Duh, you fold it.

      That's why the Japanese jumped ahead in miniature electronics -- we came up with the circuit boards, but they know Oragami.
      --
      xkcd.com - a webcomic of mathematics, love, and language.
    8. Re:Size issues? by eno2001 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Time and Relative Dimensions In Space. AKA T.A.R.D.I.S. How do you spell relief? T-A-R-D-I--ummm-S! Has anyone who doesn't like Doctor Who ever latched onto the fact that the name of his time/space vehicle is awfully similar to the word "retard"? Retardis anyone? (Yeah. Tasteless, I know. But, I'm pretty sure there are a few people out there with mental retardation that WOULD find this comment funny.)

      --
      -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
    9. Re:Size issues? by aug24 · · Score: 1
      And how would one do that, exactly

      With a very careful choice of where to cut (to avoid off-timing effects), followed by a lot of very careful cutting, and a lot of very careful soldering.

      Well, you did ask.

      Justin.
      (I have taken a digital watch and fitted it in a metal case, which required board-board soldering, so I'm not entirely flim-flamming here.)

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
  4. And the site's gone by raider_red · · Score: 0

    It looks like he was running his web server on that motehrboard. It's toast!

    --
    It's good to use your head, but not as a battering ram.
    1. Re:And the site's gone by saintp · · Score: 3, Funny

      The forecast for today: Fiery hot.

    2. Re:And the site's gone by Gandul · · Score: 1

      I guess the device didn't expect the slashdot storm!

    3. Re:And the site's gone by Gogo+Dodo · · Score: 1

      It's off the radar.

  5. hackaday.com by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  6. What do you get? by spectrum · · Score: 0, Redundant
    What do you get when you take a laptop LCD, a Mini-ITX case and an old marine weather radar?
    A slashdotting?
    --
    dave.
    1. Re:What do you get? by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

      A slashdotting?

      Bet the radar didn't detect THAT ONE...

  7. ./ Subscribers by TimeTraveler1884 · · Score: 0


    I'm giving away my secret here, but Network Mirror is more useful than just mirroring. It lets me read stories that only subscribers can, before they are posted to the masses. That's how I have time to research and come up with my witty and interesting comments as first post.

    1. Re:./ Subscribers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shhhhhhh

  8. how about? by Exstatica · · Score: 1

    What do you get when you take a laptop LCD, a Mini-ITX case and an old marine weather radar? A self contained wireless weather radar PC appliance!

    You get slashdotted? But found it on the mirror above... interesting project. But i can't find any decent marine weather radar on ebay.

  9. Hey, That's Not A Mini-ITX Case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's not a mini-itx case on that page. It is a Shuttlex which is not normally a mini-itx form factor.

  10. obligatory wit by softends · · Score: 1

    Nice! Is that what they're running the website on?

  11. Perhaps... by bedroll · · Score: 5, Funny
    What do you get when you take a laptop LCD, a Mini-ITX case and an old marine weather radar?

    The fun of watching every shmuck with a radar detector slam on their brakes as they speed past your house?

    1. Re:Perhaps... by andreMA · · Score: 1

      Or maybe the FCC knocking on your door? (didn't read TFA; substitute appropriate spectrum-licensing authority as needed)

    2. Re:Perhaps... by dukeisgod · · Score: 1

      I did read TFA. He's using the internet and a program called Strom Predator to display radar feeds from a nexrad radar site on the screen. He dosen't have his own radar, that probably would upset the neighbors.

    3. Re:Perhaps... by PeterT · · Score: 1

      What makes any of you think this thing is a radar? It's a radar display. RTFA. This thing radiates in precisely the same manner as any laptop.

  12. Ironic... by GamingFox · · Score: 3, Funny

    An radar machine didn't see the storm of slashdot coming.

  13. A more reliable weather device by tke248 · · Score: 2, Funny
  14. Slightly misleading, Nexrad is NOT a marine radar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    My first reaction was: "how the hell did he get the commercial web-based storm predator software to work with a marine radar?" but then I saw where he claims to have used a special build of the program with help from the original programmer. OK, as far as that goes... The thing is, TFA contains no images of realtime data from the "marine radar" and indeed barely mentions the marine unit at all. All the pretty pictures are of data taken from NWS nexrad sites which anyone can access over the internet. I question whether the marine radar is really of any practical use with this admittedly pretty custom display.

    Still, it's a neat project.

  15. Ok...now what? by cbovasso · · Score: 1

    What do people do with this kind of stuff after it is all finished being built? Do they actually use it? I assume most people build it just to see if they can. So you can, now what?

    --
    I ask for a car and I get a computer. How's about that for being born under a bad .sig?
  16. Gag. APCMA by wowbagger · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Gag. Another Pointless Case Mod Article.

    Here I was, thinking that maybe this guy had done something truly nifty, like interfacing the marine radar to the computer and having it serve the radar images.

    Here in Tornado Alley, such a thing would be pretty damn interesting - I know a couple of storm spotters who might just be persuaded to add that to their chase vehicles.

    But no - all this guy did was put a PC in a Radar case, and use the PC to look at radar data from the Internet.

    Now, had he fabricated a fake radar unit from sheet metal, that would have been somewhat interesting.

    Had he gone whole-hog like the guy who did the HalfLife case mods - that would have been interesting.

    But this?

    Can I have the seconds of my life back I spent looking at the article?

    May I suggest that /. create another section, pointlesscasemods.slashdot.org, and put these sort of things there?

    Or at least a "Pointless Case Mod" icon?

    I mean really - computers are getting to be like digital clock modules were in the 1980's - "Let's put them into everything! Here - let's put one in this banana!"

    1. Re:Gag. APCMA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can I have the seconds of my life back I spent looking at the article?

      You can have them back when you give me back the time I wasted reading your worthless post.

    2. Re:Gag. APCMA by smart.id · · Score: 1

      Where shall he send it to? Anyonymous Coward, USA? Even if you want to flame somebody, don't be a pussy and use the veil of anonymity to protect yourself from being criticized as well. As for the grandparent post, I agree, but asking for your time back? Being a user of Slashdot means knowing that you will get the occassional useless story (useless to some, useful to others). Your milegage may vary when defining "occassional."

      --
      blog & fiction: jd87
    3. Re:Gag. APCMA by OUWxGuesser · · Score: 2, Informative

      a) Operating marine radars on vehicles is illegal. b) It messes with our X-band research radars out in tornado alley. Thanks for not using a marine radar!

    4. Re:Gag. APCMA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought it was pretty cool..

    5. Re:Gag. APCMA by TheHawke · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Besides, Why would anyone want to be in front of a microwave emitter dishing out 100+ watts of radiation?

      Unless the jerk wants to have FLKs (Funny Looking Kids).

      --
      First rule of holes; When in one, stop digging.
    6. Re:Gag. APCMA by Winterblink · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm still waiting for the goatse guy to case mod himself. It'd probably be the first reported case of someone's ass getting Slashdotted, literally. I'm sure the collective Slashdot head would explode from the irony of the whole endeavor.

      --
      "I'm a leaf on the wind. Watch how I soar."
      -Hoban Washburn
    7. Re:Gag. APCMA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That banana happens to be my wife's dildo... how am I supposed to interface her without a PC in it ??

    8. Re:Gag. APCMA by wowbagger · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Point taken - and actually, I know of somebody who *used* to have a marine radar on his chase vehicle - note the emphasis on the past tense - it was removed for that very reason.

      Although you really should have better qualified your statement "Operating marine radars on vehicles is illegal." to "Operating marine radars on vehicles other than boats on the water is illegal."

      As is operating an aviation WX radar on a vehicle that is not an aircraft.

      Hmmm - a thought strikes me:

      Aviation WX unit.
      Small computer.
      GPS.
      801.11
      Big Wx balloon.

      Now, *there's* something /worthy!

    9. Re:Gag. APCMA by coopex · · Score: 1

      What's with the hatred of ACs? It's not like posting your email address and website makes you The American Journal of Physics compared to www.timecube.com.

      --
      The road to hell is paved with good intentions.
    10. Re:Gag. APCMA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What we have here is yet another non-interesting, non-useful story from the shmoe named Timothy.

      Timothy: You suck!

    11. Re:Gag. APCMA by Skynyrd · · Score: 1

      www.timecube.com

      Holy shit.
      I used to think I was a freak.

    12. Re:Gag. APCMA by smart.id · · Score: 1

      I never said it would give him credibility, or make him look smart. I was commenting on the fact that this person, probably a registered user of Slashdot, decided to post anonymously in order to flame somebody.

      --
      blog & fiction: jd87
  17. Answer by Anonymous+Writer · · Score: 4, Funny

    What do you get when you take a laptop LCD, a Mini-ITX case and an old marine weather radar?

    A slashdotted web server?

  18. Slapdashed! by ArsenneLupin · · Score: 1
    it's not just squeezing a motherboard into an object smaller than that motherboard

    More like attempting to squeezing a huge bandwidth through a pipe much smaller than that bandwidth...

  19. Coincidence? by stinkjones · · Score: 2, Informative

    This same exact thing found its way onto hackaday.com, and I swear a few other things featured on slashdot were there first also. Just thought it seemed strange...

    1. Re:Coincidence? by craash420 · · Score: 1

      For a while I was flaming them for reposting /. links instead of digging up their own material -- I guess my rants weren't ignored! Goold ole /. -- I don't have enough time to flame all the reposts here!

      --
      Extra medication for all!
  20. rain != boats by supernova87a · · Score: 1

    Can someone here enlighten me -- marine radar units are designed to detect other ships and fixed objects that have good reflectivity. How did he just convert one of these to detect *weather*?

    Or does rain happen to be responsive to the same microwave frequencies?

    1. Re:rain != boats by ottergoose · · Score: 3, Informative

      He's using the radar terminal from the marine radar system as a case for a PC that downloads National Weather Service radar data from the internet, so he can display it cool fashion. That is to say, he's not actually using a marine radar.

      (And yes, I believe marine radars can detect weather, however, their use on land is illegal)

    2. Re:rain != boats by JonXP · · Score: 1

      It doesn't acually use an old marine radar, as much as it uses an old marine radar display. It pulls doppler radar data off the internet, and displays it on the screen mounted in the old radar display case.

    3. Re:rain != boats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      read the article word for word, it says "old marine weather radar". Start with weather radar, end up with weather radar, moron...

    4. Re:rain != boats by E0D77 · · Score: 1

      Radar used to detect weather is not just normal radar it's actualy doppler radar http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doppler_radar

      and in the physics world radar is made up of fast moving particles wich a molecule the size of a water molecule will find it hard to evade and thus will ricochet into another direction or back to the radar antenne

    5. Re:rain != boats by Pyramid · · Score: 2, Informative

      You may not be aware, but non-doppler radar is quite capable of detecting precipitation, just not velocity.

      Previous to the introduction of the WSR-88D, all NWS radar sites(excepting research stations) were non-doppler and were quite often modified surplus military air search radars.

      And yes, even a cheap marine radar can detect rain.

      Pyramid

      --
      ~Any apparent grammatical or typographic errors are caused by defects in your display device.
    6. Re:rain != boats by absinthminded64 · · Score: 1

      Molecules that are too large for a water molecule to evade? Hmm What with the excessive Guinness consumption and all I may be approaching a size comparable to a molecule of water. Fortunately I'm a guy and not easily mistaken for a glob of mineral laden water or anything so I'm ok right? ;) By definition a molecule of water is made up of 1-2 atoms and not the large droplets I see floating in the air on a muggy day. Otherwise I'd not want to be in the way of these large 'molecules' being shot out of my local neighborhood radar tower. I'm ok with particle bombardment.. . that kinda tickles. : ) Regardless. . The only coolness I would see in this for myself is using a retired radar LCD for my own stupid purposes.

    7. Re:rain != boats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Commerical navigation radars normally operate within on of two bands...the S-band (3GHz) or the X-band (9GHz). Radars operating in the X-band and above start to get affected by environmental conditions such as rain. For this reason, most commercial vessels have at least one of each band radar, the X-band for fair weather conditions and the S-band for poor weather. In fact, most vessels carry at least two X-band radars... With that said, normal commercial nav radars aren't capabable interpeting the "cluttered" return caused by the weather as a "storm front". Even if this was so, the look angle of commercial nav radars are horizontal on the horizon for collision avoidance/navigation purposes. Although what was stated earlier is true, most modern day weather detection radars are Doppler, it is not true to say that all are such. Doppler radars are used almost exclusivly in the US for weather detection, however, that isn't the case for the remainder of the world. One of the most popular weather detection radars that come to mind that fit this description is the MRL-5. Even a weather station in Israel uses this radar and has modified it to also watch bird movements! Regards, Steve S

    8. Re:rain != boats by Yazeran · · Score: 1

      Yep normal small marine radars can detect rain (atleast in the case of bad squalls or thunderstorms). My dad has a boat with such a unit and countless times we have been able to see where there was heavy rain (within a 10 mile radius).

      Yazeran

      Plan: To go to Mars one day with a hammer.

  21. Obligatory by BCW2 · · Score: 1

    The most reliable weather device ever: go outside and see what it's doing! Everything else is just a SWAG, and mostly wrong.

    SWAG = Scientific Wild Assed Guess

    --
    Professional Politicians are not the solution, they ARE the problem.
  22. My smoke test... by feloneous+cat · · Score: 3, Funny

    We now power the thing on and... damn... I just made myself sterile.

    --
    IANAL, but I've seen actors play them on TV
  23. What's the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He can just check the thermostat in his parents' basement, right?

  24. Interesting Failure Mode... by tlhIngan · · Score: 1

    The site got replaced by a domain harvesting site... I suppose that's one way to avoid a /.'ing. Just redirect your site to one of the many domain harvesters and let them bear the brunt while your site is down.

  25. Consequences by williamhooligan · · Score: 3, Funny
    What do you get when you take a laptop LCD, a Mini-ITX case and an old marine weather radar?

    Arrested and prosecuted by the owners of The Wacky PC and Seafaring Supplies Warehouse?

    Oh no, wait, this is /., I know this one...

    "Horny at the possibilities."

  26. Funny Looking Eyeballs, actually by wsanders · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The first noticeable effect if you stand too close to the radar is it will cause localized RF burns (very painful) and possibly turn your eyes into poached egg whites (cataracts). Long before it turns your nuts into raisins. Besides the vehicle roof is a pretty good shield. These radars are frequently installed on not-terribly-tall poles on boats.

    More usefully, it's a waste of money since you'll get better data via the internet. Marine radars - at least the sub-multi-$thousand ones, just aren't that good at picking up details of precipitation at ranges of more than a mile or two. The whole point of having a marine radar is to see through precipitation!

    And if I was considering traveling to Tornado Alley to ride in a tornado chase vehicle I'd doubt the wisdom and sanity of anyone with a marine radar on their car. Some of these guys are pretty loony.

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
  27. Who uses X-band? by Sooner+Boomer · · Score: 1

    REAL researchers use C-band. And 100KW of power! See my web page or the "official" web page.

    --
    Chaos maximizes locally around me.
  28. different radar band by SuperBanana · · Score: 1
    The fun of watching every shmuck with a radar detector slam on their brakes as they speed past your house?

    Different band.

    1. Re:different radar band by bedroll · · Score: 1
      Different band.

      Yeah, I know.

      If he had an old air-traffic radar it'd be a different - and perhaps more interesting - story.

      See, I'm a shmuck with a radar detector, and that thing goes nuts every time I drive past Newark Airport.

  29. Serious answer: by Otto · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Cut it in half and solder wires between the areas where you cut the traces. I've seen it done to fit a mobo into a case smaller (in all dimensions) than the board would fit into uncut. It worked. I wouldn't want to try it myself, but it's possible to do it as long as you pick where you cut carefully.

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  30. Looks like.. by necromcr · · Score: 0

    ..the number of post replies are proportional of (server speed / average image size) + the odd_factor (look at the zombie dogs below). I cant see any 1:1 picture from that site except for the mirror thumbs..

    --
    No more I say.
  31. He's invented the T.A.R.D.I.S. by karlandtanya · · Score: 1

    ...squeezing a motherboard into an object smaller than that motherboard...

    --
    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, it doesn't go away." - Philip K. Dick
  32. Re:Slightly misleading, Nexrad is NOT a marine rad by Gharlane+of+Eddore · · Score: 1

    If you read the article, you will see that he doesn't use the RADAR part of the marine radar, just the housing of the display.

  33. DUMBASS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn, I live in tornado alley, Oklahoma. Do you have any fucking idea how easily someone could DIE becuase of a dumbass claim like yours? Wi-Fi would not WORK in a bad storm, nonetheless get life or death info on tornadoes miles outside of it's range. I'm glad I'm literate enough to know to call you on it and flame you, because others may not know enough. It's a bad idea and false advertising. Here's an idea, how about we put YOU in a storm chase and make YOU depend on this kind of crap. Go somewhere else and sell your spam. We don't want it.