Slashdot Mirror


Vehicle for Cockroaches

William Robinson wrote to mention an entertaining Wired news article about vehicle meant for cockroaches. From the article: "Hertz has constructed a three-wheeled robotic vehicle that lets a Madagascan hissing cockroach navigate a room while perched atop a ping-pong ball. The ball works like a computer mouse's track ball. Where the roach moves on the ball, the vehicle moves in the room. Sensors on the bot can tell when it's going to hit something. It also has a semi-circle of LED lights facing the roach, so when it's about to hit an obstacle an LED will shine on the creature from the direction of the barrier, hopefully causing it to run in the other direction."

198 comments

  1. Duperlicious! by Seumas · · Score: 4, Informative

    Oh wow! This is just like the one reported by G4TV/TechTV, Gizmodo, Engadget, every other blog and website and news outlet AND AND SLASHDOT (Cockroach-Controlled Robot)... SIX WEEKS AGO.

    Way to stay on top of things, Wired and Slashdot!

    Submitter... Editor... is it that fucking hard to punch the word "roach" into the search field before posting? I mean, the duplicate article is the FIRST FUCKING RESULT.

    1. Re:Duperlicious! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still don't understand why dupes make some people so angry. So you already know this particular peice of news. Big deal.

    2. Re:Duperlicious! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because it's a sign that the editors just don't care anymore. If they don't like Slashdot, they should quit. Plenty of people would be willing to take their place and do a much better job.

    3. Re:Duperlicious! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now calm down. Just take your medicine and everything will be all right.

    4. Re:Duperlicious! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps the problem is the way this site is presented. Duplicate storys are rarely seen in a real news outlet if they are presented as new. Duplicate articles on slashdot show that this is not a real news outlet.

    5. Re:Duperlicious! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they need a report as dupe mod button active at the bottom of the article for the first little while. next to the read more link. then if it gets modded as a dupe then it gets moved into a dupe section and you don't see it unless you have selected to see storys that have been modded (Score:-1, Dupe).

    6. Re:Duperlicious! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      subscribers already get this feature, but editors don't check the account.

    7. Re:Duperlicious! by waynelorentz · · Score: 1

      I can understand your outrage, especially since you're a subscriber. At least people like me aren't PAYING for dupes. Moreover, this is one of the reasons I don't subscribe to /.

      It's like when I look through the TV listings and see that HBO is running "Earnest Goes To Camp" or some other really bad 20-year-old movie. I just have to shake my head and wonder if people are mad that they're actually paying for garbage.

      (For the record, I get all of the HBOs and Showtimes included in my rent.)

    8. Re:Duperlicious! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shall I call the whaaabulance for you?

    9. Re:Duperlicious! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking of which, you have a duperlicious "AND" in your post.

    10. Re:Duperlicious! by stuuf · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      --

      Everyone is born right-handed; only the greatest overcome it

    11. Re:Duperlicious! by ryanov · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Zonk is really on top of his game lately.

    12. Re:Duperlicious! by Seumas · · Score: 1

      I think moderators should agree to start modding these posts as off-topic, unless the post has some relevant information

      It had a link, you selfish bastard.

    13. Re:Duperlicious! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously! Fucking fire Zonk!

      Probably 90% of the dupes are Zonk related.

    14. Re:Duperlicious! by rbarreira · · Score: 1

      And give the editors a break. It's a miracle the site is still operating, let alone somewhat useful given the traffic/abuse they get currently.

      Did you know that they actually get money from operating this site? And they don't even bother to read it :) This dupe is from a long ago compared to most of them, which usually occur with a day or two interval...

      --

      The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
    15. Re:Duperlicious! by Dysan2k · · Score: 1

      You know, with an id that low, one would think that you'd be used to it long by now, and yet you expect differently. 9 years running and you expect to get a different result from putting the same shit in the system.

      Obviously the son of fucking Einstein folks. Carl Einstein, the long lost tard of a bro of Albert.

      --
      -What have you contributed lately?
    16. Re:Duperlicious! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please note that the dupe count is proportional to the intoxication level of cmdrtaco.

      cmdtaco is pretty high now.

    17. Re:Duperlicious! by LetterJ · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Most of the HBO and Showtime subscribers I know aren't doing it for the movies. They gave up on that a long time ago. The original series are what most of them are paying for now. I use Netflix for movies, but still subscribe to both for Sopranos, Carnivale, Dead Like Me, Deadwood, Six Feet Under, Penn and Teller's Bullshit, etc.

      I haven't watched a movie on any of those channels in so long I can't remember.

    18. Re:Duperlicious! by Catbeller · · Score: 1

      Maybe we should stop paying for Slashdot then.

      Oh, wait...

    19. Re:Duperlicious! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just because YOU heard about this several weeks ago, doesn't mean everyone else did. I guess the /. editors should run all stoy ideas by YOU before publication to be sure YOU haven't heard them before.

      STFU

    20. Re:Duperlicious! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Because it's a sign that the editors just don't care anymore. If they don't like Slashdot, they should quit. Plenty of people would be willing to take their place and do a much better job.
      Soooo I take it you're volunteering then?
    21. Re:Duperlicious! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      (For the record, I get all of the HBOs and Showtimes included in my rent.)

      also for the record, how much do your parents make you pay? do you still have curfew?

    22. Re:Duperlicious! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps if they READ THE SITE THAT PAYS THEM they would've heard about it when I did?

    23. Re:Duperlicious! by MonkeyOfRage · · Score: 1

      I still don't understand why dupes make some people so angry. So you already know this particular peice of news. Big deal.

      Because it's somewhere between aggravating and disheartening when /. apparently doesn't have room for stories about 12 foot walking robots with guns that people can pilot (and can buy!), but it DOES have room for 8 inch rolling robots that cockroaches can pilot - twice. But that's just me I guess.

    24. Re:Duperlicious! by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      You must feel pissed that you pay more for rent just to get those shows then. It's not even an option for you to not pay for it.

      Poor fool.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    25. Re:Duperlicious! by ArsonSmith · · Score: 1

      I, for one, am glad they duped this one. I missed it 6 weeks ago and now I have it right here on the front page.

      Dupes in the same day I could see complaining about. Same week maybe worth a mention.

      But 6 weeks ago? You're just digging for osmething to bitch about.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    26. Re:Duperlicious! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless you live in a bunker, how do you miss the cockroach story? It was only in every publication and news outlet in the universe. Make Magazine, Drudgereport, Wired, Slashdot, Fark, a bazillion traditional news sources, G4TV, Gizmodo, Engadget - even some television shows.

      Did you know we also invaded Iraq a couple years ago?

    27. Re:Duperlicious! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      DO you see that star next to GP's handle? that means (s)he is a member. That means (S)HE DID PAY FOR SLASHDOT!!!!

    28. Re:Duperlicious! by waynelorentz · · Score: 1

      Since I don't have the option of paying less, I'm not paying more for it. I'm paying a fixed amount for the amenities I use. The rest is leftovers. Just like I don't take advantage of the staff masseuse, but that doesn't mean my rent goes down. And food costs the same whether I use the restaurant's dining room or have it delivered.

      Just like you don't have the option of getting a lower credit card rate because you don't call customer service every day. Or like you have pay property taxes, either directly or through your rent, whether you have children in the local school system or not.

      Looks like you're the poor fool since you don't realize you're in the same boat as everyone else.

  2. Only two things will survive nuclear war by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Cockroaches and dupes.

    Cockroach-Controlled Robot

    1. Re:Only two things will survive nuclear war by wo1verin3 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Scary... I read this as Family guy was on and Peter went "Only two things can survive a nuclear holocaust... cockroaches and twinkies". For a moment I thought he was reading to me...

    2. Re:Only two things will survive nuclear war by Almost-Retired · · Score: 1

      I don't know about the dupes, possibly. But the classical definition usually names Cockroaches, Coyotes, and White Tailed Deer. It never has, and probably never will, include humans.

      And yes, the story is a dupe. I read it in Wired close to 2 months ago.

      --
      Cheers, Gene
      "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
      soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
      -Ed Howdershelt (Author)
      99.35% setiathome rank, not too shabby for a WV hillbilly.

    3. Re:Only two things will survive nuclear war by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe the editors could be replaced by roach-controlled robots.

    4. Re:Only two things will survive nuclear war by GraemeDonaldson · · Score: 1

      and Keith Richards.

      --
      I think, therefore I am. I think?
  3. Sick by faldore · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    That's pretty sick.

    1. Re:Sick by Zhe+Mappel · · Score: 1
      That's pretty sick.

      Where is your sense of patriotism, Faldore?

      Given time and funding, this cockroach joyride could mature into deployable military technology.

      Let's hope so. As it grows increasingly hard to trick Americans into volunteering for imperial wars, we're facing a serious manpower shortage.

      But perhaps the answer has been staring us in the face, all along, and we've simply been a bit hasty rejecting recruits because we didn't like their antennae or their habit--in the case of these Madagascan hearties--of hissing.

      I say: let the Ping Pong Ball Pilots of the Cockroach Brigades steal the world's oil for us!

    2. Re:Sick by nizo · · Score: 1

      Personally I can't wait to have my very own roach chauffeur; I will be the envy of all, and can laugh at those who pay to be driven around.

  4. Incredible! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    or did they just copy the design from before?

  5. Anyone else... by Obiwan+Kenobi · · Score: 4, Funny

    Am I the only guy who read the blurb and couldn't help but blurt out: "What the fuck is Hertz doing working on a rent-a-ping-pong-ball...for roaches?!"

    It was like living in a Ziggy strip, I swear to God.

    1. Re:Anyone else... by dykofone · · Score: 1
      There's worthwhile research, and there's

      ...not exactly.

    2. Re:Anyone else... by gbulmash · · Score: 3, Funny
      They have their "never lost" GPS option. This is the new "in dash chauffeur" option they're working on. :-)

      - Greg

    3. Re:Anyone else... by drgonzo59 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Pretty soon Jimmy the roach will be driving you to work every morning and picking up your kids from school. All it wants in return is some garbage and cartboard to poop on.

    4. Re:Anyone else... by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      Apparently they believe there's a huge untapped market in renting ping pong balls to roaches...

      Didn't you see those roaches running from booth to booth at the airport trying to find a ping pong ball to rent ?

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
    5. Re:Anyone else... by ryanov · · Score: 1

      WTF is cartboard?

  6. And they say... by GeekZilla · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...Innovation is slowing down. HA! Take that Jonathan Huebner!

    first post?

    --
    Veritas patesco per quaestio questio. Truth is revealed through questions.
    1. Re:And they say... by kfg · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sure, go ahead, mock all you want, but we'll see who has the last laugh when they mount a .57 mm recoilless on that thing.

      KFG

    2. Re:And they say... by GeekZilla · · Score: 1

      See? See?! MORE innovation!

      --
      Veritas patesco per quaestio questio. Truth is revealed through questions.
    3. Re:And they say... by ozmanjusri · · Score: 1

      See? See?! MORE innovation!

      It'd be innovative if they had frickin' laser beams attached to their heads...

      --
      "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
    4. Re:And they say... by kfg · · Score: 1

      The sharks are claiming that as their intellectual property, and the sharks have the best legal representation.

      KFG

    5. Re:And they say... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      first post?

      No.

    6. Re:And they say... by GeekZilla · · Score: 1

      Thanks.

      Wasn't sure until I read your comment.

      I appreciate you clearing that up for me. ;)

      --
      Veritas patesco per quaestio questio. Truth is revealed through questions.
    7. Re:And they say... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      we'll see who has the last laugh when they mount a .57 mm recoilless on that thing.
      Probably not the roaches, since .57mm is about the size of a grain of table salt.
      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    8. Re:And they say... by kfg · · Score: 1

      Yes, that would be the joke.

      KFG

    9. Re:And they say... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1
      But it's not funny. If the roaches had a big powerful weapon that would let them get their revenge on ... whatever it is that preys on them, then it would have been. Well, might have been.

      Sounds to me like you don't understand metric; the words 'Lucas' and 'Kessel' spring to mind.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  7. If you are going to duplicate articles: by Glowing+Fish · · Score: 3, Funny

    If you are going to duplicate articles, duplicate articles, about, say, finding water on the moon, or Debian releasing a stable distro, or, people find a cure for cancer, or SCO finally going belly up.

    Why subject us to the thought of ROBOTICALLY AMPLIFIED COCKROACHES twice? Or is this just for everyone whose mind blanked this out the first time?

    --
    Hopefully I didn't put any [] around my words.
    1. Re:If you are going to duplicate articles: by chrome · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Mod parent up.

    2. Re:If you are going to duplicate articles: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent doen as "mod" troll...

    3. Re:If you are going to duplicate articles: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mod parent down as "stupid misspelling faggot geese raper" troll...

      Due to excessive bad posting from this IP or Subnet, anonymous comment posting has temporarily been disabled. You can still login to post. However, if bad posting continues from your IP or Subnet that privilege could be revoked as well. If it's you, consider this a chance to sit in the timeout corner or login and improve your posting . If it's someone else, this is a chance to hunt them down. If you think this is unfair, please email moderation@slashdot.org with your MD5'd IPID and SubnetID, which are "robmaldaisgay" and "paterisgay"

      HAHA MALDA I ACTIVATE DHCP SERVER AND DEFEAT YOU! THOU SHALL NOT EAT MY BALLS!

    4. Re:If you are going to duplicate articles: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You never have just one cockroach article.

    5. Re:If you are going to duplicate articles: by Glowing+Fish · · Score: 1

      Maybe that article just scurried over here when we weren't looking?

      --
      Hopefully I didn't put any [] around my words.
  8. Wow.... by raydobbs · · Score: 3, Insightful

    While I definately have to geek a little on this and applaud the work of people to create micro vehicles... I have to wonder the usefulness of cockroaches... I mean, isn't there enough things to research - without having to break out the need for transportation for house vermin?

    But from the purely technical aspects of it - it's amazing... a trackball driven vehicle, designed for cockroaches. A for creativity.... C- for relativity...

    1. Re:Wow.... by DigiShaman · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I think your missing the point. While we are good at developing machinery and electronics, programming AI into the system has always been the problem.

      The solution: Borrow an existing solution from nature. All you need is an insect, rat, or reptile to interface with the device and for them to obtain feedback with sensors it would closely be accustomed too.

      Just imagine for a moment using a pigeon mounted inside a scramjet with the only purpose to get an item from point A to B in a battle field autonomously. How about using rodents to operate a robotic vehicle provide surveillance or rescue missions. The list goes on.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    2. Re:Wow.... by iamdrscience · · Score: 1

      I built a robot when I was in 10th grade that did essentially the same thing as this one does, that is, move around while avoiding walls. It took me a few hours and $5 worth of electronics.

    3. Re:Wow.... by The_Wilschon · · Score: 1

      C- for relativity for sure! It doesn't get even close to relativistic speeds! And it certainly doesn't have enough mass for general relativity!





      disclaimer: yes, I know that this comment was not technically correct. There are always plenty of reference frames in which it is moving at relavistic speeds, and general relativity deals with all gravity, not just high mass. its a joke. deal with it.

      --
      SIGSEGV caught, terminating

      wait... not that kind of sig.
    4. Re:Wow.... by FurahiVSZuri · · Score: 1

      Leaving morality aside, of course...

    5. Re:Wow.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I think your missing the point. While we are good at developing machinery and electronics, programming AI into the system has always been the problem.

      The solution: Borrow an existing solution from nature. All you need is an insect, rat, or reptile to interface with the device and for them to obtain feedback with sensors it would closely be accustomed too.

      Just imagine for a moment using a pigeon mounted inside a scramjet with the only purpose to get an item from point A to B in a battle field autonomously. How about using rodents to operate a robotic vehicle provide surveillance or rescue missions. The list goes on.


      Imagine......... a dalek!

    6. Re:Wow.... by cbreaker · · Score: 1

      According to the article, the original intent of the device was to prove that a cockroach would be able to control the machine more effectively then a computer chip, in a school project.

      In the end, it proved not to be true. While the cockroach would often respond correctly to the lights he put into the device, it would not always do so. And sometimes the cockroach would just "spaz out" and run in circles for awhile. Other times it control the robot perfectly for a while, then decide to ram it into the wall no matter what the lights said.

      I'm guessing that if the initial trial run was more successful, he would have made the device do more then just avoid walls.

      Apparently, his new robot will be a little better at letting the cockroach know that it needed to do something new.

      I think it's pretty interesting, if nothing else but to help better understand the cockroach itself.

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    7. Re:Wow.... by lxs · · Score: 1

      Just imagine for a moment using a pigeon mounted inside a scramjet with the only purpose to get an item from point A to B in a battle field autonomously.

      Behaviorist B.F. Skinner imagined it before any of us, way back in the 1940s

    8. Re:Wow.... by GeekZilla · · Score: 2, Funny

      And sometimes ... would just "spaz out" and run in circles for awhile.

      You just described my 2-year old son.

      --

      It's not the PC's I hate, it's...oh wait-yes it is.

      --
      Veritas patesco per quaestio questio. Truth is revealed through questions.
    9. Re:Wow.... by tchernobog · · Score: 1

      I mean, isn't there enough things to research - without having to break out the need for transportation for house vermin?

      Considering the number of accidents happening on the roads nowadays, maybe they're submitted to find a new DDT substitute. Pack a cartload of all those damn roaches in a nice Ferrari, all drunk, and see them smash at 180Mph on the guard rails! The pure violence of the scene would compensate for the costs of a full scale research on the balistics of roaches intestines!

      Which makes me think about the philosophical side of the whole thing... are we just roaches running on a almost-spherical Earth, waiting for a divine LED to show us the way, just randomly selfdestructing on the first wall available[1]? Don't miss the theological impact of this valuable research on the human mankind. We could even question the final Answer of Life, the Universe and Everything[2]! Heck, it may even be: "How many roaches do you have to smash before reaching compassionate happiness?"

      Anyway, without goind too OT: in my times, if you had a complex AI system, you tried to bring the damn bugs out, not _into_ it.

      ...ok, sorry, I'll stop drug abuse, I promise.

      [1] Loosely ref. "The Rocky Horror Picture Show" ending
      [2] Ref. Douglas Adams' "The Hitchhiker's Guide To The Galaxy"

      --
      42.
    10. Re:Wow.... by cvas · · Score: 2, Funny

      A cautionary tale for your animal-waged war...

      we3

    11. Re:Wow.... by jrumney · · Score: 1

      It's good during the development stages, as the bugs become features. "Oh damn I flipped the wrong bit in the wall detection algorithm" becomes "Yes!!!, another one of the bastards squashed against the wall".

    12. Re:Wow.... by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      Quite. There's no reason to have the roach in the loop at all - other than a bullshit gimmick.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
    13. Re:Wow.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean, we could live like the Flintstones?

    14. Re:Wow.... by joNDoty · · Score: 1

      For this experiment, coachroaches proved to be very unpredictable. What if they hooked the thing up to several cockroaches, and took the most common reaction from the group as the correct response?

    15. Re:Wow.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck off, you hippie cuntsmear shit licker.

    16. Re:Wow.... by Wrexs0ul · · Score: 1

      A beowulf cluster of cockroaches perhaps?

      -Matt

      --
      --- Need web hosting?
  9. Make by iamdrscience · · Score: 1

    There's an article about this in the most recent issue of "Make" magazine, the magazine put out by O'Reilly. It has a neat picture of the cockroach up close with the velcro that's cemented to its back. Very neat.

  10. Whoa... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wouldn't THAT look weird on your kitchen floor.

    *scatter*.

  11. Roaches by DrugCheese · · Score: 4, Funny

    They're gonna be the ones surviving the nuclear wars anyway, so might as well teach them how to use the technology while we can.

    --
    *DrugCheese rants*
    1. Re:Roaches by Guppy06 · · Score: 1

      We'll see if you keep saying that once they learn how to make their own nuclear bombs!

  12. I am not an exterminator (IANAE) but... by Krankheit · · Score: 2, Funny

    What happens when this new cockroach vehicle becomes more popular? What if I find cockroach hummers and cockroach minivans? And, by any chance, could these be modified hotwheels cars? I am afraid this will make the job of exterminators much harder.

    --
    Powered by caffeine and sugar; BSD
    1. Re:I am not an exterminator (IANAE) but... by SPY_jmr1 · · Score: 2, Funny

      If I were an exterminator, i'd be more worried about cockroach anti-personel fragmentation mines.

    2. Re:I am not an exterminator (IANAE) but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > What happens when this new cockroach vehicle becomes more popular? What if I find cockroach hummers and cockroach minivans?

      There, you see, the guy has everything planned: that's where LEDs come into play... they're being trained to stop at red lights!

    3. Re:I am not an exterminator (IANAE) but... by Aeiri · · Score: 1

      If I were an exterminator, i'd be more worried about cockroach anti-personel fragmentation mines.

      If I were an exterminator, I'd be more worried about getting a better job.

    4. Re:I am not an exterminator (IANAE) but... by turgid · · Score: 1

      As a European, I'm more worried at the effect this will have on the world oil market and global warming. Running a car here in the UK is expensive enough due to high oil prices without the added demand from bugs with SUVs.

  13. Ironically, roaches are also good at duplication by suitepotato · · Score: 1

    Between continued dupe-a-mania and the thought going through my mind of the bugs from Joe's Apartment getting their own pimped out rides, I think I've had enough for one night. Good night /.

    --
    If my grammar and spelling are off, I am [distracted/tired/careless] (take your pick)
  14. GuardedNet! by PHAEDRU5 · · Score: 1

    Vehicle for Cockroaches? Subject line says it all.

    --
    668: Neighbour of the Beast
  15. This gives new meaning to the phrase: by soulctcher · · Score: 2, Funny

    Roach Coach.

    1. Re:This gives new meaning to the phrase: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Roach Coach.

      And the speed at which these coaches travel...

  16. Getaway car by quokkapox · · Score: 1
    Great, this will help the little buggers safely evade the other robots sent to terminate them.

    Yet my Open Source Flea Circus Java Spyware Toolbar Firefox Extension article submission was rejected AGAIN!?

    --
    it's a blue bright blue Saturday hey hey
    1. Re:Getaway car by Grey+Ninja · · Score: 1

      Yes, but what if they put the extermination robot in charge of the roach-mobile? It would be UNSTOPPABLE!

  17. Very smart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    If they can just get them to use cellphones while they drive it might be a great way to wipe out cockroaches. Darwin would be proud.

    1. Re:Very smart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First post ever deserving of '+10, funny'.

  18. Yeah that's a good idea by JudgeFurious · · Score: 1

    Let's teach some insects how to OPERATE MECHA! That seems like a good plan. Once we have the driving the little ones around we'll go ahead and give them the three story tall robots with weapons.

    As if fighting off the cockroach hoardes isn't going to be tough enough in the future.

    --
    Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars.
    1. Re:Yeah that's a good idea by poopdeville · · Score: 1

      And they laughed when I welcomed our mecha controlling roach overlords.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
  19. I wonder... by PsiPsiStar · · Score: 1

    if the robots ever got caught in those sticky traps.

    I'd have the terrible urge to smash his invention with a rolled up newspaper.

    --

    ___
    It's the end of my comment as I know it and I feel fine.
  20. Its obligatory by jolande · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well, I for one welcome our newly mobilized Cockroach overlords

  21. End of Future... by PHAEDRU5 · · Score: 1

    "when it's about to hit an obstacle an LED will shine on the creature from the direction of the barrier, hopefully causing it to run in the other direction."

    In other words, the perfect antidote to politicians, and GuardedNet executives.

    --
    668: Neighbour of the Beast
    1. Re:End of Future... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're pretty upset about this GuardedNet thing, arentcha? Blow some more karma and say why, whydon'tcha? Lose your job or something?

  22. Ummmm, repeat? by ninja_pirate · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Is it such a slow news day that they have to repeat stories? About cockroaches, no less.

  23. Innovation Getting Slower? by jjh37997 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Who says innovation is dead when such wonderful inventions like the cockroach car are being created by the world's best and brightest....

    1. Re:Innovation Getting Slower? by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      It was the only thing left that hadn't been patented. Well, there was hang-gliders for elephants, but come on, that's just a plain silly idea.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  24. Great... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    So nice that the quality of life for cockroaches is getting better. Too bad that the quality of life for humans is not getting any better.

  25. Innovation? by dpdawson · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Who says innovation is getting slower?

  26. Innovation by sholden · · Score: 0, Redundant

    And people dare claim innovation is getting slower.

  27. Great... by ShatteredDream · · Score: 4, Funny

    Next thing you know, we'll be giving squad cars to the spiders to keep those speed demon roaches in check...

  28. if I was that roach.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    would you smoke me? zulu corridor

  29. Grinning Evil Death by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, don't we learn anything from old cartoons?

  30. Violating the Prime Directive by NetSettler · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Animals do learn, and these are ones that are already remarkably durable. Is anyone doing this experiment asking whether this is a good idea?

    I'm actually relative serious when I say: I hope they're disposing of the test subjects afterward and not sending them back to the hive to say: "I figured out the rosetta stone to their technology. Now we'll have no trouble taking over."

    I recently re-watched the original Jurassic Park and was properly impacted by someone's remark at some point that they'd be safe from the Raptors untilt hey figured out how to turn a doorknob. It was an excellent point about intelligent creatures. I'm actually not worried a bug is going to drive a car, but I do worry that Einstein's remark "a mind one stretched by a new idea never regains its original shape" might have some applicability here if we make a regular practice of this kind of thing.

    We don't need to be artificially creating triggers that put roaches into a more advanced intellectual state ahead of their own natural evolution.

    Star Trek teaches us the Prime Directive, which says approximately: don't interfere with the evolution of lower life forms because they may not have the wisdom to use their newfound knowledge for the betterment of mankind. I say we follow that lead in this case.

    --

    Kent M Pitman
    Philosopher, Technologist, Writer

    1. Re:Violating the Prime Directive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I believe the phrase you attribute to Einstein was one by Oliver Wendell Holmes.

    2. Re:Violating the Prime Directive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm actually relative serious when I say: I hope they're disposing of the test subjects afterward and not sending them back to the hive to say: "I figured out the rosetta stone to their technology. Now we'll have no trouble taking over."

      I'm actually relative serious when I say: You are a complete and utter loon!

    3. Re:Violating the Prime Directive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      so... i should stop teaching my kittens to type?

      Assistant monkeys for the handicapped should be a real concern for you then. They're the front wave, the observers...

    4. Re:Violating the Prime Directive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I for one, welcome our now cockroach master overlords.

    5. Re:Violating the Prime Directive by NetSettler · · Score: 1

      You are a complete and utter loon!

      Well, I expected a certain statistical number of this remark for having tried to have an open discussion. Today's science is blurred by a belief that we can pre-judge the answers to questions like this. But I don't think we can.

      I don't think we know how intelligence is bootstrapped, and I think it would be a good idea if we asked questions about that before risking giving things the "idea" of being intelligent (for want of a better phrasing).

      Ethics is about not being afraid to confront questions, not about being sure you know the answers. I don't know the right answer to some ethical questions, I only know that when you stop asking the questions, you've taken a definite step in the wrong direction.

      Nor do I think you can say there is definitively no question here.

      --

      Kent M Pitman
      Philosopher, Technologist, Writer

    6. Re:Violating the Prime Directive by NetSettler · · Score: 1

      Assistant monkeys for the handicapped should be a real concern for you then

      Ok, I'll confess to minor sensationalism by using "the Prime Directive" as my model, since I think it's more complex than that. But it seemed a pithy way of introducing the issue of ethics without putting people to sleep. I'm not so sure that a strict rule of non-interference is really the issue, though I think that's a good debate topic. What I do think is a more useful ethical line is "if the thing I'm experimenting on actually did become intelligent, would I be [pardon pun] bugged?"

      I think most people would think that if guide animals were smarter, that would be good. (People might change their mind if those animals tarted to apply for Social Security, Welfare, equal Access to public buildings--including bathroom access, non-discrimination in employment, etc. But that's a debate for another day. For now, at least, I think they would say they don't fear animals that we already deal with one-on-one, and that are already semi-integrated into our society getting a bit smarter.)

      Cockroaches are not generally welcomed in our society at all (at least in the western world). We are somewhat at war with them. That's probably a useful distinction to consider when feeding them information and ideas which would make people less worried about other animals.

      so... i should stop teaching my kittens to type?

      I think I'll steer clear of (stereo)typing cats for now. In this case, it's not the cats I fear, it's their owners.

      --

      Kent M Pitman
      Philosopher, Technologist, Writer

    7. Re:Violating the Prime Directive by Tzarius · · Score: 1

      With regard to giving other species information about technology and such, I don't think it would be a great concern until that species could effectively support the transmission (and creation?) of memes / abstract ideas. And when that happens, we'll have bigger problems.

    8. Re:Violating the Prime Directive by NetSettler · · Score: 1

      I don't think it would be a great concern until that species could effectively support the transmission ... of memes

      Well, I guess part of what I was getting at is that we don't know what triggers this, whether it's a gradual process or a sudden epiphany-like event. Would this particular thing cause it? My point here was not that I was alleging I'm the keeper of the Secret Knowledge that if you put a roach in a car, it will evolve. My point was that I'd feel better if research like this were coupled with some degree of ethics and philosophy, and a bit of concern about possible ill consequences in the general process of this kind of research.

      Btw, thanks for mentioning memes--I didn't know that term and have linked its definition to your quote in case others didn't either.

      --

      Kent M Pitman
      Philosopher, Technologist, Writer

  31. Sigh.... by khellendros1984 · · Score: 2, Funny

    1. Insert generic and superfluous statement regarding dislike of dupe'd articles

    2. Make obvious reference to previous story

    3. Welcome our newly mobile cockroach overlords

    4. ????

    5. Profit!

    --
    It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by a grue.
    1. Re:Sigh.... by qazwsxqazwsx90 · · Score: 1

      Now we need a Beowulf cluster of vehicles running Linux and driven by old Korean cockroaches in soviet Russia.

      Did I miss anything?

    2. Re:Sigh.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Did I miss anything?
      ... the frikkin laser beams
  32. But does it play... by 404notfound · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... La Cucaracha for the horn?

  33. DUPLICATED ARTICLE!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This has been already published here...

    What's the point? To fill Slashdot with duplicated garbage all the time? Shame on you!

  34. Cockroach Auto Insurance by robotsrule · · Score: 1

    I intend to capitalize on the upcoming roach motorist boom and have started my own auto-insurance firm, dedicated to serving the needs of our squishy mobile friends.

    Accepted forms of payment are RoachPal, MasterDung Cards, and The Madagascar Express Card ("Don't leave roach droppings without it!")

    We are currently accepting new investors.

    --


    Robert Oschler - RobotsRule.com
  35. What they need... by jpardey · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is a way to give editors bad karma...

    --
    I have freaks! I did something right...
    1. Re:What they need... by DamienNightbane · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Personally, I'd rather see the ability to mod posts stupid first. There are alot of worthless posts out there that are just plain stupid or incorrect rather than offtopic, overrated, troll, or flamebait.

  36. CONVERGENCE by haakondahl · · Score: 2, Insightful
    It also has a semi-circle of LED lights facing the roach, so when it's about to hit an obstacle an LED will shine on the creature from the direction of the barrier, hopefully causing it to run in the other direction.


    I live in Japan. My wife's car beeps when you put it into reverse. Not outside the car, mind you, where it might warn a luckless pedestrian (tm). INSIDE THE CAR ONLY. Perhaps the roach's semi-sircle of LEDs could be added to my wif's car, and we could give the roach a backing beeper.

    We'll submit it to the IEEE then post on /. to celebrate our standards-based convergence.
    --
    Don't trust anyone under thirty.
  37. Fuck LEDs to move roaches... by PornMaster · · Score: 1

    How about some natural sunlight to make slashdotters move around to different areas of their mothers' basements?

  38. Well... by iamdrscience · · Score: 2, Funny

    Good luck debugging this thing!

  39. No brainer by natrius · · Score: 2, Informative

    Instead of brains, the roaches have ganglia: clumps of nerve cells on various parts of their bodies.
    ...
    "It was kind of a no-brainer that (Hertz's bot) would be a piece we would include..."

    Zing!

  40. So... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1
    ... your quality of life is governed by how much money you have?


    That's sad, really. It must suck to be you.

    1. Re:So... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

      May I ask how you draw your conclusion about me? It doesn't make sense. I'm just making a joke that it's ironic that cockroaches might be better off than humans. Maybe you didn't catch that...

  41. Innovation Getting Slower? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Innovation Getting Slower?
    Vehicle for Cockroaches

  42. HOORAY! by Stephen+Maturin · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is a great step forward in re-abilitating the handicapped cockroach and enabling him to regain his place as a useful, contributing member of society!

    --
    Non tam praeclarum est scire Latine, quam turpe nescire
    -- Cicero
  43. Drive-by's by EnsilZah · · Score: 1

    That would probably result in some GTA-like action.
    I can see it now, roaches selling drugs, roaches in drive-by's.
    In soviet russia roach exterminates YOU.

  44. Great! by argux · · Score: 1

    Those damn things are already immortal. Now they're teaching them how to use machines. Soon they'll be able to develop their own technology and then we'll be their livestock. They'll make us cook for them, and they'll only let us eat food they've already walked on, and then we'll have to fight each other in arenas for their amusement. It's so fucking disgusting.

    That's a great idea for a new FPS right there! I hereby licence this concept under the Creative Commons licence, which I've never read but can't be too bad.

  45. I move, you move -- just like that by xoboots · · Score: 1

    I guess it is an art project and not a science project but still...the bot seems to be completely superfluous as the cockroach is not even given the slightest indication that its actions are controlling the bot. The cockroach either changes direction when facing a light or not. Wooo. The idea that actions affect outcome is a much different proposition than using goal directed actions to pertain a particular outcome.

    So I'm forced to disagree with Hertz -- this system is far less interesting than a computer.

  46. Re:Ironically, roaches are also good at duplicatio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hey man, it got switches n' dubs. I got julio to do a mural of my girl on the hood, she was a bitch tho, everytime the fridge light would come on, man, she would run!

  47. I'll never figure out these editors... by gbulmash · · Score: 1
    They dupe this article, but reject a story with pictures of Bill Gates on a waterslide.

    Sigh.

  48. Oh great. by rudydog · · Score: 0

    Oh great now there is going to be a bunch of fan and lazy ass cockroaches.

    1. Re:Oh great. by rudydog · · Score: 0

      fat*

  49. Crash testing by volley_srfd · · Score: 1

    The fireman in me wants to see the crash test results. Does it have airbags?

    1. Re:Crash testing by robotsrule · · Score: 1

      Actually the biggest problem is keeping the offending driver in the accident from "flea"-ing the scene.

      --


      Robert Oschler - RobotsRule.com
  50. Do they describe how to make one? by ZosX · · Score: 1

    Because that would be awesome. Just imagine. I could finally fulfill my lifelong dream of unleashing a freakin army of cockroach piloted helicopters with freakin lasers. One billion dollars never seemed so close and so far away than it does right now.

  51. Confusion... by ryanov · · Score: 1

    Maybe I'm retarded, but isn't this a "vehicle" in the same way that the Flinstone car is a vehicle? I mean, the roach still has to walk anyway. What does this research actually teach us? I'm willing to be the antennae were working better for the roach than the LED idea. If someone shined an LED into my eyes while I was driving, I'd probably slam right the fuck into the thing that I was supposed to be avoiding.

    1. Re:Confusion... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You still have to move your legs in an automobile. If every cm the roach walks means a meter worth of travel for the vehicle, then you'd be a hundred times faster. Oh, and you still have to walk inside an airplane, so technically speaking, this ain't great, either, right?

    2. Re:Confusion... by ryanov · · Score: 2

      First of all, nothing said that the ball moves 1 cm and the roach moves 1 m. It says that the roach walks and the vehicle moves. That's sorta like me walking on top of a log and rolling down the street. Sure, I'm rolling along the street, but I'm still expending just as much energy to do so. Also, what airline are you flying that makes you walk to power the plane?

    3. Re:Confusion... by Junta · · Score: 1

      It has to walk, but nothing says the speed of the device being controlled has to be exactly the speed of walking. Walking could translate to 100 MPH movement if you wanted. Cockroaches don't exactly have the capacity to learn how to manipulate something other than what they are born knowing, so it makes sense.

      Besides, the point of this is supposed to be at least somewhat artistic. Also, a kind of experiment to see how a cockroach compares to traditional methods of using programmed microcontrollers to acheive the same thing.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
  52. That takes the cake. by Zhe+Mappel · · Score: 1
    Not only are the little buggers going to inherit the earth.

    They're going to be driving our ping pong balls!

  53. Robo-Roach and the Digital Watch by Blind_Io_42 · · Score: 1
    We just can't leave well enough alone can we? First digital watches, then self-activating faucets and now we are trying to improve on the only thing that will survive man kind... ok roaches and twinkies. Thank you Douglas Adams for the comparison material.

    We keep trying to kill the little (or if you are in the tropics Cadillac-sized) buggers with various chemicals. How hard is it going to be when they can just flip on the A/C in the Roach-Coach and motor comfortably accross the kitchen floor? Damned things won't even scatter when you turn the light on either; just flip the sun visor down.

    --
    No one of consequence
  54. Pigeon guided missile by FleaPlus · · Score: 4, Informative

    This reminds me a little bit of the pigeon guided missile, a project that the noted behaviorist B.F. Skinner worked on during World War II.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pigeon_guided_missile

    During World War 2, Project Pigeon was American behaviourist B. F. Skinner's attempt to develop a pigeon-guided missile.

    The control system involved a lens at the front of the missile projecting an image of the target to a screen inside, while a pigeon trained (by operant conditioning) to recognise the target pecked at it. As long as the pecks remained in the center of the screen, the missile would fly straight, but pecks off-center would cause the screen to tilt, which would then, via a connection to the missile's flight controls, cause the missile to change course.

    Although skeptical of the idea, the National Defense Research Committee nevertheless contributed $25,000 to the research. However, Skinner's plans to use pigeons in Pelican missiles was apparently too radical for the military establishment; although he had some success with the training, he could not get his idea taken seriously.

    1. Re:Pigeon guided missile by klept · · Score: 1

      I can see it all now. The missle is targeted at AlQuida. But something goes wrong. The pidgen is targeting Washington, the White House. "Stop you dumb bird " , they say. "Hell no", says Mr Pigin, " Not until I get my corn."

  55. Global warming.... by FooGoo · · Score: 1

    First muscle cars, then SUVs, now roach coaches....the poor planet

    --
    People who bite the hand that feeds them usually lick the boot that kicks them
  56. I thought... by mangus_angus · · Score: 1

    that lawyers drove BMW's, Benz, and other high priced cars?

  57. If a scientist was an animator at Pixar by MindPrison · · Score: 1

    ...This is definetively what he would spend his spare time on researching.

    --
    What this world is coming to - is for you and me to decide.
  58. goodbye cutco! Selective Cockroach breeding! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    has anyone pondered the possibility of rating the manuevering ability of these cockroaches, then breeding the more "successful" drivers?

    1) devise a way to map the cockroaches motor/neural/ganglia structure.

    if the offspring prove just as well at piloting or better, many many generations later, one could compare the differences of the them to determine what makes them better drivers.

    2) forget about the ganglia and just clone cockroach pilots and sell them and their cars as pets

    3) profit!!!

  59. Well, I for one by ad0le · · Score: 1

    welcome our ping pong ball riding cockroach overloards.

    --
    My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-bitch.
  60. Re:Roaches... "Land of the Lost"? by HungWeiWeiHai · · Score: 1

    Or, "The Land that Time Forgot"...

    I can see a whole new series of cartoons, except Chaka will be recast as a "ChakaRoach".

    Imagine if your next Rental from Hertz ad shows cockroach-powered cars.

    I wonder how they'll measure horsepower; "CREHP" (Cock-Roach Equivalent HorsePower). Maybe CRP or RP: RoachPower.

    So, next Toyota and their new subsidiary GM will figure how to run electrons under the roach wings, into that green/white puss-pack stickin' out the back end of female roaches' ass, and then into the brain of the roaches and cockroaches and put them on a neural net so they turn or screech or whatever all in unison. Maybe cockroaches will be a new fangled crystal timer clock. Maybe that crystallin' screamin' will excite some isotopes to incite the wheels of a vehicle to turn...

    Hell, for that matter, we'll eventually have Roach Clocks instead of full-fledged Atomic Clocks. You'll know when your Roach Clock can no longer rock around the clock... the crystal will be green and display a few feathered legs stuck on one of the glow-in-the-dark minute markers...

    Might create new terminology for some sex-depraved nerds and engineers and spawn a series of new jokes, especially if Intel has to learn to tune Cock (roaches) to CPUs (angle of the dangle, pico farad, etc...). Yech...

    Maybe a helmet full of of cockroaches snapped onto the heads of a few movie producers and movie execs might inspire innovation in a new line of cinema scripts to reinvigorate the movie house receipts...

    "Coming (that is, "Crawlin'") to a theatre NEAR YOU: "Chaka and the ChakRoaches", the battle between Saturday AM Proto Re-run Man and the Enduring-Nascent/Ascendant Roach Beings" (our new crawling, umm, overlords...)

    Then, when Hertz and Avis and Budget have their CREHP wars (before the nuke wars ensue), one of them can bust out with the PussyCat Dolls' song "Don't Cha" (and do some rhymez with Busta Rhymes) with:

    "Don't Cha wish ya had KokROACH lak mee?
    Don't Cha wish yah had a kokROACK lyke MEE?
    Don't Cha?
    Don't Cha?...

    I know da feeh-len!
    I know dat feeh-lun!

    And ah hear da screelin'
    I hear dat screelun'

    Clip-cloppin' HORses out-torqued
    By ROAches in MAH street-machine..."

    Now, to start the perv-nerds off on the right leg, umm, foot:

    Would it be "cock(roach) blocking to hyper-irradiate those cockroachs? Or would it be cock-blockin' if you put a few popsicle sticks or kindergarten letter blocks in the roaches' path? Or, would that be legal "En-Croach-Ment"

  61. even i can remember by cacoe · · Score: 1

    omg, even i can remember the first time this story was here. the first time round, the writer directly to the scientists website that actually had some interesting informatin on the subject...

  62. alternative hertz unit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    With a name like Hertz, he was bound to invent something great.
    Too bad the unit hertz is already taken. if it wasnt, in future instead of being a unit of frequency, it might be a unit of distance defined by how far a cockroach can pilot a threewheeled vehicle in 1 minute.
    Soon he will be hiring these vehicles to roaches. He could even start a business and call it Hertz or something.

  63. Hehe... by Gibberx · · Score: 0

    You have not seen the last of Kim Jong Il!!

  64. Hurrah! by FhnuZoag · · Score: 1

    Now we just need a version that works with humans, and we can really change the world.

  65. In Soviet Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cockroaches eat you. .Sorry.

    - Moomin

  66. NEW OXMORON... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Slashdot Editors"

  67. Subscribing by 110010001000 · · Score: 1

    And why are you paying to subscribe to such a site? It just validates their behavior.

    Also, is it so hard for editors to actually edit the submissions? There is an obvious sentence fragment in the summary. It makes this site look like it was run by retarded high school dropouts.

  68. But there is already a vehicle for cockroaches... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...it's called an SUV!

  69. Re:SLASH FUCKERS - wankers like .com ceos by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, English is a second language, huh?

  70. Am I the only one that isn't offended by dupes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sure it's a dupe story..but I didn't know because I don't see EVERY SINGLE STORY slashdot runs.

  71. Mod parent left. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mod parent left.

  72. From the mind of a hissing cockroach by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 1

    That'sssssssssss right dumbassssssssssss... give me ssssssssssssome better mobility - muhahahahahaha! I'll play niccccccccce and sssssssstupid while the lightsssssssss are on, but asssssssss sssssssssoon asssssssss they go out, my assssss is down the ssssssstreeet...muhahaa...muhaa....muhahhhahahahah a!!!

    --
    Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
  73. That's nothing. by unknownideal · · Score: 1

    In Florida the cockroaches are big. They drive vans.

  74. Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Whoever invented that......needs to get a girlfriend.

  75. Re:Roaches... "Land of the Lost"? by Various+Assortments · · Score: 1

    How do you feel now, having all that work fall flat?

  76. Evolution does not have any purpose by nietsch · · Score: 1

    We don't need to be artificially creating triggers that put roaches into a more advanced intellectual state ahead of their own natural evolution.

    You seem to be falling for the ID crap. Evolution itself does not exist, it is just a concept. Evolution is not some godlike entity. Therefore it can not have any purpose, like a 'god' could have. That also means there is no 'natural evolution.' Stuff just happens. What happens to one species does always influence other species in its environment. So if mankind decides it would be a nice idea to put cockroaches in robots, then good luck on the roaches. It does not, however, change the roaches in any way.
    Maybe that happens when somebody starts to breed roaches selectively. But that happened for thousands of years with lifestock and has not rendered any chicken overlords yet. (Cue jokes about some dumb president)

    --
    This space is intentionally staring blankly at you
  77. Exciting..(yawn) by bozojoe · · Score: 1

    wow isnt this news worthy, can I go to sleep now?

    --
    lick the cancle button (at least thats what our Chinese QA says)
  78. Creepy... by FurryFeet · · Score: 1

    Their relatively large size make them easier to work with than other types of roaches, and their tendency to hiss when they are upset lets him know if it's time to give one a break

    And we all know, of course, this is how many horror films begin, right?

  79. Classic! by Whyte · · Score: 1

    ROFL

    --
    -- No matter how great your triumphs or how tragic your defeats, approximately one billion Chinese couldn't care less.
  80. That's just great... by JetJaguar · · Score: 1

    The lines for driver's licenses at the DMV are about to get a whole lot longer. Thanks a lot!

    --

    Shop Smart, Shop S-mart!

  81. Oh great! by HexaByte · · Score: 1

    As if it's not hard enough to kill the stinking things already, now we have to contend with them running away on motorized carts!

    How long before some smart roach drops a Hemi in one of these things and REALLY outruns us?

    --
    HexaByte - he's a square and a half!
  82. So this is how the Daleks were born! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Exterminate...exterminate!

  83. Next on TV and Radio by Demodian · · Score: 1

    Commercials for how Geico can save you up to 15 percent on your family's 6-legged drivers too.

  84. Re:Roaches... "Land of the Lost"? by HungWeiWeiHai · · Score: 1

    Erated

  85. Dupe conspiracy theory by bismark.a · · Score: 1

    Aim: To test the reader loyalty to slashdot. And or its method of business.

    Method: Send in a dupe (A particularly noticeable one) and see if people remember and comment about it. Analyse the response for status and modify system accordingly.

    Benefits: Yeilds a very good idea about reader loyalty trends.

    Risks: Disgruntled users get bored and move over to other Discussion forums.

  86. Excellent. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This will clear the way for GTA New York City.

  87. slashdotzeihmer by marcas1 · · Score: 1

    When can you recognize a slashdotzeimer?
    - When admins post more than 2 dups week (3 last week)
    - When readers have too much, too often posts to read and forget it's a dup or when the they start a new post-war about dups, and so, trolling the dup of yesterday?

    The posts feeds are getting shorter, it should mean that ./ readers know don't forget the point of Godwin

  88. So, Does this mean... by cmdrwhitewolf · · Score: 1

    I'm going to be hissed at in Cockroach-ess by the passing 'motorists' instead of hearing obscenities?

    --
    [Now, I'm off to lift my le... Um, visit... at another place.]