Slashdot Mirror


Self-Heating Coffee Hacking

ptorrone writes "Awhile back I wrote about the new Wolfgang Puck self-heating coffee containers that took 10 years and $24 mil to develop. Well, I managed to find them in a local store and bought them to take apart to see how they work. Once activated, they reach 145 degrees in about 6 minutes. This isn't a review of the beverage, it's all about the stuff that makes the liquid hot, how it works, pictures and links to patents. I am looking in to how these could be recycled too."

67 of 377 comments (clear)

  1. Wikipedia by Avuton+Olrich · · Score: 4, Insightful

    He should definitely put that into the wikipedia.

  2. Instantly hot! by LandownEyes · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wish that worked on girlfriends...

    1. Re:Instantly hot! by drgonzo59 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It does. But in addition to the coffee mug you need movie tickets, a box of chocolates and sometimes flowers.

    2. Re:Instantly hot! by SportyGeek · · Score: 4, Funny
      I wish that worked on girlfriends...

      Wait, what are those?

    3. Re:Instantly hot! by drgonzo59 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Well for "_instanly_ hot" you might just not need a girlfriend but pay $50 to someone on the corner. It is kind of like eating Taco Bell instead of fine cuisine that takes longer to prepare. You get it fast and quick but then you feel sick for a long time. With a girlfriend you need millions, coffee, chocolates, flowers and time but then you might find someone to be with you for the rest of your life.

      Well, I didn't have millions, my girlfriend (now wife) luckily for me overlooked that requirement.

    4. Re:Instantly hot! by anagama · · Score: 4, Funny

      I wish that worked on girlfriends...

      Wait, what are those?

      Don't worry about it, coffee is better than women.

      --
      What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
    5. Re:Instantly hot! by modecx · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Exactly! Being very empathetic can score you chicks, but it's just as likely to gain shopping partners.

      --
      Constitutional rights may be respected, repealed, or modified; but they must never be ignored.
  3. Soup by Punboy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This would be great for taking soups along with you. Especially for lunchs or breakfasts, or on hiking trips.

    --
    If you like what I've said here, and want to read more, go to http://www.krillrblog.com
    1. Re:Soup by Speare · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Except for carrying out all that extra self-heating crap with you. You do pack out your garbage, right?

      --
      [ .sig file not found ]
    2. Re:Soup by ocelotbob · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Better to get some of the self-heating pads from army MREs. They're a lot smaller, they get hotter, and they're not designed to be idiot-proof. Much more fun, and better all the way around, plus easier to pack out.

      --

      Marxism is the opiate of dumbasses

    3. Re:Soup by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Caches. Who carries all their stuff in with them? You set up caches of stuff ahead of time, about two or three days apart and hike between the caches.

      Leave your trash in the cache, and pick it all up later. Takes some prep, but you can hike longer and use more stuff as you go, without having to carry it all at once.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    4. Re:Soup by kevcol · · Score: 2, Funny

      So let me get this straight-

      To set yourself up, you do the hike the first time, and leave yourself your caches at predetermined intervals.

      Then, when you are ready, you do the hike all over again , happy in the knowledge that you already did the complete hike once to save yourself time and effort.

      Clearly this isn't backcountry backpacking you are talking about.

    5. Re:Soup by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Better to get some of the self-heating pads from army MREs.
      Yeah, but they'll only work if you have a rock, or something.

    6. Re:Soup by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 3, Informative
      Yeah, but they'll only work if you have a rock, or something.

      I don't think anyone appreciates how funny this is. If you've ever seen the directions for how to use the heater packet for an MRE you'd know what this is about. There is a line drawing of someone using the heater and how it must be propped up in order to work correctly since it contains water. There is a label that points to the thing it's propped up against and it says "rock, or something." Brilliant.

      On a side note, I once took my girlfriend camping and I went to the trouble to bring out all the ingredients for stir fry, including the wok. Well, one of my friends showed up with a case of MREs and she decided she'd rather have one of those. Did I write girlfriend? I think I meant to write ex-girlfriend.

      --
      http://www.rootstrikers.org/
  4. Oh no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hot coffee hack? Wait till the ESRB hears about this!

  5. Waste? by Mattwolf7 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Those seem like such a waste (on top of the $25 million)

    Why did this take so long to figure out? MRE's have been self-heating for a long time and the heater in them gets really hot in less time...

    1. Re:Waste? by n0-0p · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I totally agree. I appreciate the Make post on how it works, but this product is taking throw away culture to an extreme. The convenience can't possibly be worth all the manufacturing and materials going into a single hot cup of cofee. And given the way it's packaged, there's no way you're going to reasonably recycle any of this. This is so wasteful it honestly offends me.

    2. Re:Waste? by prockcore · · Score: 2, Interesting

      MRE's have been self-heating for a long time and the heater in them gets really hot in less time...

      Oh man, I can't wait until some lawyer gets sue-happy and sues the military for patent infringement.

      Then a bunch of marines will issue their response by rapelling down from the skylight and dropping their papers on the CEO's desk.

    3. Re:Waste? by name773 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      at the very most they could put a tax on things like this if they really really really felt the need, e.g. if it was starting to be a problem or something. at that point someone could air statements against the use of such items during prime time commercials or something. get some media coverage

      the most ideal solution to me would be other people demonstrating to users of this product what a waste it is and maybe teaching them of the wonderful thermos (those things are sooo cool (or hot, depending)). this is something for society to correct, not the government (i think of them as separate but coexisting entities)

  6. But why? by pointguy · · Score: 2, Funny

    But why would anyone buy Wolfgang Puck's coffee, which I've never heard him associated with? It's like the idea of buying Lil' Caesar tea... why would I?

    1. Re:But why? by ryanov · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I dunno where you are from, but at least in the NY area I've seen a number of Wolfgang Puck cold coffee drinks, akin to the Starbucks variety. They've become pretty common over here, and I think I've seen them in NY Penn Station among other places.

  7. wasteful by gonk · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Okay, maybe it is neat that they've been able to make this work, but doesn't it seem just a bit wasteful to anyone but me? Western society at it's best, I guess.

    robert

    1. Re:wasteful by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They have had heating and cooling containers in Japan for at least a decade. Western...?

      Don't hate.

  8. GTA tie-in by jridley · · Score: 4, Funny

    After the article earlier about the GTA hack, /.ers will all be much more interested in hot coffee than before.

  9. No reheating? by ViciousVII · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Would have been interesting if they made seperate compartments or something to allow for reheating later. And on a seperate note, what the hell did they spend $24 million on? The chemical compound? Beyond that everything else seems to be simple and already existing technology.

    1. Re:No reheating? by Punboy · · Score: 2, Funny

      Getting Wolfgang Puck to endorse it :-p

      --
      If you like what I've said here, and want to read more, go to http://www.krillrblog.com
  10. The army has been using this tech by Punboy · · Score: 5, Informative

    The army has been using this technology in its rations for a loooong time now.

    --
    If you like what I've said here, and want to read more, go to http://www.krillrblog.com
    1. Re:The army has been using this tech by zenneth · · Score: 2, Informative

      The army has been using this technology in its rations for a loooong time now.

      Christ, I've been *out* of the Army since 1990, and we didn't have that technology built into our MREs, so please don't put such an emphasis on the "long" part. I'm getting old, but don't push it.

      --
      The Chronic *WHAT* les of Narnia!
  11. Not a whole lot... by arstchnca · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The article notes that the container, while appearing very large, actually holds less coffee than one would originally think. Even after the author removed the insulation, there was still little room for the coffee itself.

    Also, because it uses a water / calcium oxide reaction (basic high school chemistry stuff), which means that it'll heat once and then become nothing more than another cup. While I have no idea how much these retail for, I'm sure that the price is inflated more by the "oh shiny" factor than production or development costs.

    --
    -- arstchnca
    --
  12. great idea but.... by R33MSpec · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's a great idea however the amount of coffee you actually get to drink compared to the mechanism that makes the whole thing work is quite a small amount (i.e like the size of a short macchiato).

  13. 25 Million and 10 years? Right... by XorNand · · Score: 4, Insightful

    25 Million and 10 years? That's like employing 15 scientists and engineers at a good wage (plus room for admin overhead), all working 40 hour weeks for an entire decade.

    For this low-tech device? Something doesn't add up.

    --
    Entrepreneur : (noun), French for "unemployed"
    1. Re:25 Million and 10 years? Right... by Vegeta99 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ah, grasshopper. This is America, you have missed some things:

      Problem 1: Will it get too hot and burn a petty-lawsuit-starting lawyer?
      Problem 2: No matter how harmless the CaO, will it ever leak out from container failure?
      Problem 3: Will the FDA be OK with out materials?
      Problem 4: How do we make it simple to use?

      That's 4 problems in 10 seconds I thought of. Give them 31536000 times longer, and I'm sure they can come up with more.

    2. Re:25 Million and 10 years? Right... by femto · · Score: 5, Funny
      $10k = scientist to develop the inside of the container.

      $500k = team of engineers to figure out how to make 10 million containers per month.

      $24,490k = marketing guys to decide on shape of the container and what to print on the outside of it.

  14. American Coffee by nihilogos · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Pulling it apart is probably the best thing you could do with it.

    You see, the thing that many people in the US completely miss is that the breweing of coffee was perfected in 1855 and it is senseless to mess with it. A shot of espresso made with freshly roasted / ground beans and on a well maintained machine by a well trained barrista is the apex of coffee perfection and cannot be improved upon. There is no substitute, and it cannot be put in an can.

    Why the hell such abominations as the Wolfgang Puck Gourmet Latte and just about everything they serve at Starbacks are permitted to exist is beyond me.

    --
    :wq
    1. Re:American Coffee by venicebeach · · Score: 5, Funny

      You see, the thing that many people in the US completely miss is that the breweing of coffee was perfected in 1855 and it is senseless to mess with it. A shot of espresso made with freshly roasted / ground beans and on a well maintained machine by a well trained barrista is the apex of coffee perfection and cannot be improved upon.

      Wow, spoken like a true innovator. You must work for Microsoft.

    2. Re:American Coffee by iamdrscience · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Why the hell such abominations as the Wolfgang Puck Gourmet Latte and just about everything they serve at Starbacks are permitted to exist is beyond me.
      Here is why: Most people in America drown their coffee in milk or cream and saturate it with sugar. People don't like coffee, they like a slight coffee flavor. Wolfgang Puck's gourmet latte is the same thing most peoples' coffee tastes like but chilled. Quite frankly, I think it's a little gross, these people are putting so much crap in their coffee that it ceases to be coffee and becomes almost like hot chocolate. Hell, I once worked somewhere where we prepared two different chocolate flavored blends! People that got them were consistently the worst offenders in regards to cream and sugar over-use. I mean, I can understand somebody preferring their coffee with a bit of milk or cream and a packet of sugar, but you go somewhere and watch what people put in their coffee, in my experience it's not uncommon to fill a quarter of the cup with milk and put in three or more packets of sugar. Certainly there are plenty of people who put less or none (and a few who put more) but I would say the average is about as I have stated. I suppose it depends on where you get your coffee though, starbucks would be a little better and most other coffee houses would be a lot better. My experience comes from having worked in a convenience store -- a more average sampling of coffee drinkers in my opinion

      Also, when I said "Americans" before, I didn't mean to imply that this is something that only Americans do, but instead I said that just because that's where my experience is. I understand that people in plenty of other places do the same thing to a lesser or greater degree.
    3. Re:American Coffee by SashaMan · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wow, spoken like a true innovator

      Wow, you managed to get in the obligatory anti-Microsoft comment on a story about a coffee can. Now that's innovation.

    4. Re:American Coffee by xeno-cat · · Score: 2, Insightful
      While having your coffee made by a profesional is certainly the best, I have found second best to be using a stove top Bialetti espresso maker. These things are amazing.

      Bialetti link

      I have a fairly good espresso maker with a steam wand but have found the Bialetti to be less hasle and it makes better coffee.

      Also, I got a battery powered stove top milk frother that allows me to make as much foam and latte milk as a pan will hold, quickly. I can get stiffer foam out of the steam wand but the stove top frother creates a nice foam that works when I need to make several at once for guests.

      To the sibling poster who said that Starbucks employees are well trained, I beg to differ. What the parent poster is talking about with regards to a profesional is not a graduate of a 2 week course on coffee making. They are talking about someone who has grown up in a culture that has an appreciation for excellence in coffee. You can't get that at Starbucks, no matter how hard they smile. Sadly, Europe is the place I have had the best coffees. I've had close in the North End in Boston. Starbucks is burnt motor oil by comparison.

      Kind Regards

      --
      "A few great minds are enough to endow humanity with monstrous power, but a few great hearts are not enough to make us w
    5. Re:American Coffee by pintomp3 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      i've tried non-oiled ones, but my gf kicked me out of bed for doing it.

  15. I have an idea! by elmegil · · Score: 2, Funny

    Let's just plug the MAKE blog's rss feed into Slashdot directly!

    --
    7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
  16. Coral cache by Codester · · Score: 2, Informative

    Lots of pictures... try this Coral cache

    -Code

  17. candidate for sabotage by 5plicer · · Score: 5, Funny

    I bet you'll start seeing obnoxious pple going through all of a store's stock pushing the heat button on each of the cans so that the end customer gets cold coffee :p

    --
    The bits on the bus go on and off... on and off... on and off...
    1. Re:candidate for sabotage by Fear+the+Clam · · Score: 4, Funny

      Right after I finish squishing the Wonder bread, my good man. Right after.

    2. Re:candidate for sabotage by mpath · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually - they put a tennis ball can lid (you know, the kind that you have to pop & peel?) over the heat button to curtail that.

      --
      I'm not sure what the secret to success is, but the secret to failure lies in trying to please everyone -Bill Cosby
  18. How much?? by rerunn · · Score: 2

    Anyone know how much one of these things cost? Do is it even taste good? I cant imagine it would be any better than any other instant coffee.

  19. Re:Google Cache by AKAImBatman · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's been mentioned time and time again that Google does not cache images. If you want a backup, use the coral cache or Mirrordot

  20. Re:"hacking"? by arodland · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That pretty much covers it. Tear it apart, see how it works. That's been the way to "hack" for at least 50 years.

  21. There are 2 patents on this thing... by rolfwind · · Score: 4, Informative

    [/rant]
    The hack is cool.

    But this crappy coffee can is worthy of a patent? A calcium oxide/water reaction learned in any highschool advanced chemistry class?

    Reading the patent below, I must wonder if those who give out patents get lost in the gobbely-gook of the descriptions not to see that it seems to fail the basic requirements of a patent:

    http://www.patentsearchexpress.com/requirements.ht ml

    Especially in the view of non-obviousness in view of prior art. Self-heating pads using assorted chemicals have been around for a long time. How long was it before someone applied it to not to hands but to food/drinks which we've been warming up since like forever. This is question of application, not innovation.

    I also have to question the $24 million to develop this thing. Reminds me when GE (or maybe whirlpool???) came out with front-loading washers like 10 years or so ago and announced it took $100M to develop and spouting all the benefits of the system (lower water consumption, etcetera). When the europeans have been using front-loaders since at least the '50s, you gotta wonder who's been embezzling all that cash.

    [/rant]

    (From The article}
    United States Patent 5,461,867
    Scudder , et al. October 31, 1995
    Container with integral module for heating or cooling the contents

    Abstract
    An outer container for holding a material, such as a food, beverage or medicine with a sealed thermic module inside the container. The thermic module contains chemical reactants that mix upon actuation of the container by a user. Mixing of the reactants produces an exothermic or endothermic chemical reaction, depending upon the reactants selected. The contents of the outer container surround a portion of the outside surface of the thermic module, thereby facilitating conduction of heat. The thermic module has a hollow module body that is closed at one end and a module cap that seals the other end of the module body. The module body contains the solid reactant, and the module cap contains the liquid reactant. The module cap has a tubular section with a flexible member closing one end and a breakable barrier closing the other end. With the exception of the barrier, the cap is of unitary construction. The cap has one or more integrally formed prongs extending from the inner surface of the disc toward the barrier. The prongs move in an axial direction toward the barrier and may also spread apart radially when the outer surface of the flexible member or an actuator connected to it is depressed by the user's finger. The dual motion of the prongs in both axial and radial directions promotes complete puncturing of the barrier and thus fast mixing of the reactants.
    Link.

  22. Re:Waste?-Recycled Rubber. by artemis67 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just make sure it doesn't heat up to 145 degrees on you.

  23. ho hum... nothing new here. by pair-a-noyd · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The military has been doing this for YEARS.
    MRE heaters.. No big deal. You can buy them by the crateloads at gun shows for 50 cents each, will heat a meal in a few minutes, just add water. Stores forever.
    Must have items if you live on the coast where you may lose power from hurricanes, etc..

    (one of MANY places to get the things..)
    http://militarysurplusdepot.com/m_r_e_heater.html

  24. Mr Obviousman to the rescue! by paiute · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can't believe that noone has made the obligatory joke about the old woman who spills the Wolfgang Puck coffee on herself and then sues him for millions.

    Followed by the debunking replies who will supply the link to snopes.

    Followed by the bashing of lawyers.

    Then someone will blame it on MS/USPTO/RIAA/SCO.

    By then it will have thankfully dropped to the bottom of the page and then into old news.

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
  25. Wow! by iamdrscience · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Finally I can get a hot cup of coffee anywhere I go, because, you know, it's not like there's a place to buy coffee on every corner.

    Oh wait, Starbucks...

    ...and a million other convenience stores, restaurants, cafes and coffeeshops.

  26. Re:Waste?-Recycled Rubber. by Oopsz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    but are cheap to create, use little raw materiel, have a small waste footprint, and their production and use are in the public interest (epidemiologically speaking).

  27. Re:a better way... by incabulos · · Score: 2, Funny

    Antimatter would do a great job heating it up, but at the loss of a portion of the coffee, which would be annihilated. I hate seeing good coffee wasted, even on such an efficient process as total conversion of matter to energy.

    Fitting a magnetic bottle and cyclotron into a small portable coffeecup is also somewhat of a dilemma.

  28. Cost... by cobrabyte · · Score: 2, Informative

    According to USA Today, the retail price is around $2.25.

    -c

  29. Re:a better way... by mako1138 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Off topic, but...

    The energy in a matter-antimatter (proton anti-proton) reaction goes toward the production of various particles that are of sufficiently high energy to pass right through your coffee: muons, gamma rays. Neutrinos too, which don't interact.

    Under the unrealistic assumption that all the energy produced goes toward heating the coffee:

    2ng matter + 2ng antimatter = 4e-9 g

    E = m*c^2
    = 4e-9 g * (3e8 m/s)^2
    = 3.6e8 g*m^2/s^2

    A joule is kg*m^2/s^2, so we're looking at 3.6e5 J of energy. Approximating coffee with water, water has a heat capacity of 4186 J/(kg*K), and assuming we have 100 cm^3 of it:

    3.6e5 J / 4186 J/(kg*K) / 0.1 kg = 8600 K

    I hope you like your coffee vaporized.

  30. Re:Seems a bit much for a cup of coffee.. by ryanov · · Score: 2, Informative

    I subscribe to Consumer Reports, which has reviewed them in the 08/05 issue. They apparently go for $9 per four pack. Not TOO much more than current cold coffee drinks, but I think those are more than 10oz, right? I know I usually drink a 16 in the morning.

    A catch, they said, is that you have to store them at room temperature. On a cold day, apparently, they won't get as hot (108 was all that they could get after putting it in the fridge).

  31. Re:ditto... by n0-0p · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I realize this is offtopic and will risk getting modded down, but why are you duping my post word for word an hour later? Is this karma theft instead of karma whoring? It actually seems to work because you got modded up and I got modded down "redundant."

    I assume that you just wait for a higher rated post to scroll off the first page and then repost at the top. I am curious on why you'd even bother though. Are you just trying to game the mods and see if they're paying attention? It seems like an odd hobby.

  32. Altitude problems? by zetetikos · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've tried these. They are not too great tasting, but handy. However I dragged some along on a camping trip in Colorado, thinking how great it would be to have hot coffee first thing in the morning. Well they don't seem to work at 9,000 feet above sea level. It was also about 60(f) degrees out. Didn't even get warm. Buzz kill - literally. They heat up OK in Denver - 5,000 feet - starting from room temperature. There is no warning about altitude issues on the containers that I could find, so maybe it was the starting temperature, but if it reaches 140 degrees from 70, I would think it would still become reasonably warm from 60.

    1. Re:Altitude problems? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      That doesn't make any sense. The MRE heaters are unaffected by altitude or starting temperature (a specific requirement by the military).

      In fact, many MRE's are frozen and contain two of the heater packs. One to thaw the food and another to heat it.

      Maybe these coffee things are using a crappier chemical heater?

  33. That PDF is dumbBe warned by GoClick · · Score: 3, Informative

    Be warned that the previos poster's opinion is wrong and he's not entitled to it. The PDF isn't related and the other blogger isn't better.

    We don't have those fancy things in Canada as far as I know but I wouldn't buy em if we did. First of all it looks like you don't get very much coffee and second it looks expensive and third you're allways in driving distance of a Tim Hortons anyways.

    How often are you so far from a power source that you can't spend $10 and get a small coffee cup sized hotplate?

    Silly silly silly

    On the other hand if you could somehow drain the coffee and put a heat activated smoke bomb or something in there than they'd sell

  34. Pricing... by Otto · · Score: 2, Insightful

    While I have no idea how much these retail for, I'm sure that the price is inflated more by the "oh shiny" factor than production or development costs.

    Yeah, pretty much. A 4 pack sells for about $6. I found these in a grocery store a couple months back and picked up a 4 pack for the "oooh shiny" factor. The coffee was only so-so, of course, but it did deliver as promised. Coffee got properly hot.

    I too was struck by the weight and heft of the thing. I felt that it's be useful for camping trips because, if necessary, you could beat a puma to death with the damn thing. Way, way overbuilt. Very solid feel to it.

    I have not purchased them again, and likely will not except for possible camping purposes. The real question, for me, is where would one need this sort of device? At home, you have a microwave if you need to heat up a plastic tube of premade coffee, so the self-heating is redundant. Most workplaces have coffee makers for the employees which tend to be always full. In the car on the way to work, you could stop by a coffee house or fast foodery or something. It would be handy for being out in the wild, far from power and easily obtained coffee, but how often does that occur? People who go camping usually only go maybe once a year, and usually they are in RVs nowadays, with power and coffee making devices.

    It's basically a product without a large market.

    If the thing held soup, now, you'd have something. Lots of office worker types would likely keep several in their desks. Because while many offices have microwaves, and microwavable soups already exist, not having to get up to have some soup has an odd attraction to it.

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  35. Re:McWolfgang Lawsuit by headonfire · · Score: 2, Funny

    jesus, not hot coffee, anything but hot coffee.

    What do you expect? Just don't put it on your nuts and you'll be fine.

  36. Canned Heat by Sharefield · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This "new" thing is in the First World War was used by the English army to warming up their canned food.

  37. Re:ditto... by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Most of the money went to research legal defences in case someone ignites one of these in their lap then sues.

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  38. Re:ditto... by SunPin · · Score: 2, Funny

    This happened to me twice. That's why I don't post anything meaningful anymore if I post at all.

    --
    Laws are for people with no friends.
  39. Re:definition of waste by JetTredmont · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Finally, I do buy food that I throw out all the time. I would be a big fat pig if I ate every french fry I ever bought. Is it wasteful? I dunno, everyone who grew the potatoes, transported them, turned them into french fries, cooked them and sold them to me thought they were making a reasonable profit on them. I thought it was a good value for my money - in fact I got TOO MANY with my "#4 lunch special". I ate what I wanted and tossed the rest. Then the garbage man gets paid to haul it away. Whee!

    At which time it goes into a landfill and quite rapidly decomposes, providing fuel for the non-immediately-biodegradable substances to start decomposing.

    The "waste" is that this coffee cup goes into the same landfill, takes up about as much space as two super-size french fry orders, and yet last, oh, let's just estimate that it lasts about ten million times as long in said landfill.

    The PROBLEM here is that not all costs are passed on to the consumer OR to the provider. The cost of waste disposal is horrifically uncapitalized in the US, primarily because, aside from materials deemed "hazardous waste", there is no good way to regulate it. If waste management were properly capitalized, styrofoam cups would run for hundreds of dollars. But, it's not. You pay as much to throw out the styrofoam cup that rents landfill space on the order of eons as you do to throw out the serving of lasagna you left too long in the fridge, which will be gone from the landfill (as a discrete body of substance) in a matter of weeks.

    No matter how "free market driven" an economy is, it needs to understand where free markets fail. They OFTEN fail when public goods and services are needed to handle their byproducts, and this is a perfect example of that.

    In other words: yes, this is a horrendous waste of resources, and even though I do firmly believe in free market forces, I'd love for my government to step in and put a mandatory recycling program (vendor-funded) or heavy use tax on products such as this. Because it's not the producer who pays for this today, nor the consumer, nor the garbage man. It's your children and mine, who have to live in this filth.