Slashdot Mirror


Google Moon Debuts

Ian writes "From the FAQ: 'One small step for Google... On July 20, 1969, man first landed on the Moon. A few decades later, we're pleased to cut you in on the action. Google Moon is an extension of Google Maps and Google Earth that, courtesy of NASA imagery (thanks, guys!), enables you to surf the Moon's surface and check out the exact spots that the Apollo astronauts made their landings.'"

63 of 462 comments (clear)

  1. Conspiracy! by Slartibartfast · · Score: 5, Funny

    If you zoom in to maximum resolution, you'll find "proof" we never landed there. ;-)

    1. Re:Conspiracy! by wpiman · · Score: 2, Funny

      What I want to know is how the Swiss got their first?

    2. Re:Conspiracy! by spot35 · · Score: 2, Informative

      unfortunately, current telescopes don't have the resolution to view the landers. Newer crops of space born telescopes should be able to view them.

      This link seems to provide some information on a probe that the ESA launched. Unfortunately, the images from the flybys have not been released. From linked article of why hubble cannot view the landers - "Anything left on the Moon cannot be resolved in any Hubble image," According to the Space Telescope Science Institute, which operates Hubble for NASA. "It would just appear as a dot."

      I'm sure I've read about newer telescopes that will be able to resolve the landers. Can't find the articles now though.

    3. Re:Conspiracy! by The+Other+White+Boy · · Score: 5, Informative

      i hope this doesn't break this site, because it doesn't belong to me.

      Exploring the Apollo Landing Sites

      lets you click thru pictures to zoom in farther and farther, using pics from earth- and orbit-based telescopes, as well as photos from the orbiters and command modules.

      some are good enough resolution that you can see the lander, albeit barely. you can see the rover tracks in all of them though.

    4. Re:Conspiracy! by DrEldarion · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh, stop being such a tinfoil-hat. The FDA determined that the cheese, being covered in all sorts of different green space molds, was unfit for human consumption.

    5. Re:Conspiracy! by Smidge204 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Except that wit the resolution of any of the cameras currently available, objects like the lander and rover would be less than pixel wide. IE: Basicaly invisible.

      So unless you have the cash to move one of those secret spy satellites from earth or lunar orbit (Because they are too far away if left in earth orbit), the only way you're going to see them is to go land on the moon again.
      =Smidge=

    6. Re:Conspiracy! by The+Patient · · Score: 5, Funny

      Probably the same way many of us in other countries did: an opportune moment arose (!) while we were over at our girlfriend's house and her parents were away.

    7. Re:Conspiracy! by Jaseoldboss · · Score: 2, Informative

      It probably can't but for those who get the NASA science newsletter they covered this a couple of weeks ago.

      "the smallest things Hubble can distinguish are about 60 meters wide. The biggest piece of left-behind Apollo equipment is only 9 meters across and thus smaller than a single pixel in a Hubble image."

      http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2005/11jul_lroc .htm?list154599

    8. Re:Conspiracy! by uberdave · · Score: 4, Informative

      You could also point a laser at the moon and see if you get a reflection back. A few of the Apollo missions left retroreflectors on the lunar surface.

    9. Re:Conspiracy! by AhtirTano · · Score: 2, Funny

      The pictures are obviously faked--you can't see any whalers anywhere.

    10. Re:Conspiracy! by iamlucky13 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I sure hope you can't see the rover tracks in all of them. If I remember correctly, Apollo 15 was the first mission to carry a rover. This is just proof that the moon landing was a conspiracy and the tracks must be from trucks hauling all the camera and sound gear, the "astronauts," and the fake landers to the "landing site."

      You'd think they would've at least been smart enough to scatter the tracks with a broom so those in the tin-foil hat mafia with nice telescopes wouldn't be able to unravel the mystery so easily.

    11. Re:Conspiracy! by NuclearDog · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's shit like that that makes me love Google.

      If someone is going to take over the internet, I'd definitely rather it be Google. At least they have a sense of humour.

      ND

      --
      This statement is forty-five characters long.
  2. Awesome... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now I can find the best route to work. If they get Google Moon Ride Finder up and running I'll be all set.

  3. HaHa by maotx · · Score: 5, Informative

    And who says Google doesn't have a sense of humor?

    Example 1:
    From their FAQ:
    4. Is Google Moon a result of your Copernicus initiative?

    Glad you asked, and yes, the development of our lunar hosting and research center continues apace. We usually don't announce future products in advance, but in this case, yes, we can confirm that on July 20th, 2069, in honor of the 100th anniversary of mankind's first manned lunar landing, Google will fully integrate Google Local search capabilities into Google Moon, which will allow our users to quickly find lunar business addresses, numbers and hours of operation, among other valuable forms of Moon-oriented local information.


    Example 2:
    On moon.google.com, if you zoom all the way in on the moon the imagery changes from satellite shots of the moon to a cheese template. Sense of humor at it's finest.

    Looking forward to see what they come with next.

    Side note: Does Google still offer satellite imagery of Mars in Google Earth? It was offered when it was Keyhole.

    --
    I'm a virgo and on Slashdot. Coincidence? Yes.
    1. Re:HaHa by iapetus · · Score: 4, Interesting
      And who says Google doesn't have a sense of humor?

      Well, The Register says they don't have a sense of humour...
      --
      ++ Say to Elrond "Hello.".
      Elrond says "No.". Elrond gives you some lunch.
    2. Re:HaHa by zipzap54 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Of course Google has a sense of humor.
      I emailed lunarjobs@google.com about their available positions. It seems everyone else got to them first ^_^

      "From: lunarjobs@google.com

      Thank you for contacting Google about our Copernicus Research Center.

      We've received an overwhelming response to this opportunity and are not
      currently accepting additional resumes. We will, however, keep your
      information on file should we have an opening in the future. At the
      current staffing levels, we anticipate that we may need additional
      applicants on or around April Fool's Day in 2104. Until then, we
      appreciate your interest in Google and your taking the time to write us.

      Sincerely,

      The Googlunar Recruiting Team"

      --
      "All programmers are playwrights and all computers are lousy actors."
    3. Re:HaHa by Whamo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Whatever you do, DO NOT go to full zoom at uranus.google.com

  4. Obligatory joke coming.. by Paska · · Score: 4, Funny

    Google Overlords: Earth, check. Moon, check.

    I, for one, welcome our new Moon overlords.

    1. Re:Obligatory joke coming.. by m50d · · Score: 2, Funny

      5 posts and we haven't had a "that's no moon..."? What's this place coming to?

      --
      I am trolling
    2. Re:Obligatory joke coming.. by Minwee · · Score: 2, Funny
      Ahem.

      "That's no moon, that's a search engine!"

      Is everybody happy now?

  5. Now we can all see the studio. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Since we all know that the moon landings were faked, I'm sure we are all looking forward to seeing the studio on the lunar surface where they filmed it all.

    1. Re:Now we can all see the studio. by Adrilla · · Score: 3, Funny

      If the moon landing were faked, then the studio would NOT be on THE MOON

      --

      "Plans are for fools! Oglethorpe, the plutonian (Aqua Teen Hunger Force)
    2. Re:Now we can all see the studio. by JonasH · · Score: 5, Funny

      You'd have to appreciate the irony of it though.

      <moviemaker> Sir, to realisticly fake this moonlanding, we need special gravity conditions.
      <superior> Like what?
      <moviemaker> Well, the best place to film it would be.. on.. you know, the moon.
      <superior> We can arrange that.

      Just shows that the real money is in movie-making.

  6. Falsified by Arthur+B. · · Score: 4, Funny

    I can't even see Dr. Evil giant "laser" !

    --
    \u262D = \u5350
  7. You bastards, you've slashdotted GOOGLE! by dlawson · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can't believe you did this!

    --
    dot-sig.
  8. Cool by Alex+P+Keaton+in+da · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Google has a man on the moon as it's cartoon today....
    This moon feature is beyond cool- but may be another productivity sapping item for me at work. What I wonder is if we will get full zooming. My understanding is that google maps is purposely limited so people can't "see swingsets" in back yards (i.e. pedophiles).
    What will this do to Hoagland's career if they do this for other planets, say Mars? Is Cydonia over?

    --
    And All I Ask is a Tall Ship And a Star to Steer Her By
    1. Re:Cool by digidave · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "My understanding is that google maps is purposely limited so people can't "see swingsets" in back yards (i.e. pedophiles)"

      That's pretty stupid. Sounds like a new urban legend. Pedophiles don't need to look at satelite imagery to find victims. If the resolution is limited, it's more likely for general privacy reasons.

      Quite likely, they want to limit the size of the images they store, so they don't use the highest possible resolution.

      --
      The global economy is a great thing until you feel it locally.
    2. Re:Cool by Alex+P+Keaton+in+da · · Score: 4, Informative

      I got the crazy idea from Google Chief Executive Eric Schmidt...
      Link here.... http://news.com.com/Quote+of+the+day+Cant+see+your +swing+set/2110-1029_3-5713885.html
      Text: Quote of the day: 'Can't see your swing set' Published: May 19, 2005, 12:00 PM PDT By CNET News.com Staff
      Google Chief Executive Eric Schmidt, in defending his company's privacy policies at a symposium Thursday, said the detail on the new map-linked satellite imagery is deliberately limited. "We cannot see your swing set, and we're not trying to," he said, adding that Google has complied with government agency requests to blank out areas of its satellite maps. "The value of more information so overwhelms its misuse that we've not had material problems there."

      --
      And All I Ask is a Tall Ship And a Star to Steer Her By
  9. So when's Mars coming up? by Pegasus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Seriously, with all the imagery Nasa has, Google Mars would be nice too.

    1. Re:So when's Mars coming up? by Spacejock · · Score: 3, Funny

      Absolutely... Because we're all keen to find the nearest Mars Bar.

  10. something is missing by circletimessquare · · Score: 3, Funny

    i can't get driving directions to those locations

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  11. haha by Rinisari · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hey, the moon IS made of- *by the time this message is posted, 500 other geeks will have beat me to the end of that sentence and have already posted what everyone is going to find out within 30 seconds of looking at the site*

  12. Lunokhod Soviet moon robots? by evilandi · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I note that Google have conveniently forgotten to place the Soviet (Russian) Lunokhod moon robots on the map (at Sea of Rains and Le Monnier, Mare Serenitatis).

    --
    Andrew Oakley - www.aoakley.com
    1. Re:Lunokhod Soviet moon robots? by Sketch · · Score: 2, Interesting

      > I note that Google have conveniently forgotten to place the Soviet (Russian) Lunokhod moon robots on the map (at Sea of Rains and Le Monnier, Mare Serenitatis).

      I wonder if the Google Maps API works on Google Moon. Maybe someone else can make a page which adds them. ;)

      --
      -- OpenVerse Visual Chat: http://openverse.com
    2. Re:Lunokhod Soviet moon robots? by lxs · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Further proof that manned missions capture the public imagination far better than unmanned missions.

      I'm usually the first to accuse Americans of not caring about the world outside the US borders, but since they are commemorating the first man on the moon, it stands to reason that they only mark the manned moon missions.

  13. It's True! by Panaphonix · · Score: 3, Funny

    Instead of putting down an American flag, they installed a big letter A! I wonder why I can't see it at night?

    1. Re:It's True! by Megane · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm more worried about where they hid the "H" than about the "C" and "A".

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    2. Re:It's True! by Alien+Venom · · Score: 2, Funny

      Do you remember Apollo 13 landing on the moon? I sure don't. Doofus.

  14. Clickable image map of lunar landing sites by wherley · · Score: 4, Informative
  15. Goatse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    http://uranus.google.com/

    But don't zoom in!

  16. Here is a GPL PowerMap. by tetrahedrassface · · Score: 4, Interesting
    We run #space on freenode.

    One of our members has created this:

    http://hobbiton.thisside.net/advmap_moon.html

    Its a take off of google maps, but extends some some functionality into it. It looks really nice. Enjoy!

    Stop by #space sometime for a visit.

  17. Re:Google Moon CONTEST ! Find the face by szo · · Score: 3, Funny

    the face is on the mars...

    --
    Red Leader Standing By!
  18. Mars Imagery by bucklesl · · Score: 2, Informative
    Does Google still offer satellite imagery of Mars in Google Earth? It was offered when it was Keyhole.

    If you pay for Google Earth Plus you can choose the Mars database. If you had a previous subscription to Keyhole, they gave you the Plus version with a one year extension.

    --
    help fill in hidden movie endings @ End of the Credits
  19. Enough of the conspiracy shit by Quiet_Desperation · · Score: 5, Insightful
    http://www.clavius.org/

    If you honestly think the moon landings were faked, you are mentally handicapped.

  20. Mars is right here by mmacdona86 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Try this-- it's open source, Linux and windows compatible, does need Java Web Start

    Mars MOLA Viewer
  21. What? No Wallace and Grommit landing site? by kriegsman · · Score: 3, Funny

    The full-zoom view of the Moon is worth the price of admission all by itself. ("That's it Gromit....che..eeese. We'll go somewhere where there's cheese!")

    It's too bad that they don't identify all the other historically significant moon landing and lunar event sites -- Wallace and Grommit's landing site from "Grand Day Out" (1991), the big splat from "A Trip To The Moon" (1902), the nuclear explosions opposite Moonbase Alpha (September 13, 1999). Now that I think about it, it's probably only a matter of days before someone makes this as a Google Moon Hack.

    -Mark

  22. No Starbucks nearby? by chiph · · Score: 4, Funny

    Amazingly, a local search turns up no Starbucks coffee shops in the area.
    And I thought they were everywhere.

    Chip H.

  23. There's always next year... by Sebastian+Jansson · · Score: 3, Informative

    They actually mention that in their blog.

  24. The Moon is really made by KingBahamut · · Score: 2, Funny

    Cheese....
    Need some wine and crackers to go with that.

    --
    "God of Rock, thank you for this chance to kick ass. "
  25. So Close and yet so far. by 955301 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I wish they would have taken this more seriously. The moon actually have a massive number of named points of interest which would be nice to be able to look up.

    Personally, I name all of my software projects after features named during the Apollo landing missions. For a second there, I thought I might be able to provide a url in the javadocs to a map of the actual landmark for the team. While not very useful, it certainly would have been educational.

    --
    You are checking your backups, aren't you?
  26. My God by Ranger · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's full of cheese!

    --
    "You'll get nothing, and you'll like it!"
  27. Re:No by mikael · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The high resolution images completed missed half of Edinburgh in Scotland, and imaged a large number of fields to the West instead

    At least we know which field to use for a picnic.

    The most minding bending image I've seen is of Wilshire Blvd in LA, where all the buildings seem to be leaning at different angles. I assume this is due to photographs being taken from different perspectives.

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  28. Googling the moon is fine by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 3, Funny

    But I absolutely refuse to Google Uranus!

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  29. Re:Planets by Cro+Magnon · · Score: 2, Funny

    That might be true of Jupiter or Saturn, but I'm sure they'll find solid matter on Uranus.

    --
    Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
  30. Fourmilab has been doing this for years by toby · · Score: 3, Informative

    John Walker's wonderful Earth & Moon Viewer has been around for as long as I can remember. See this page for a catalogue of formations, landing sites and other points of interest.

    --
    you had me at #!
  31. Best commercial ever by Dachannien · · Score: 2, Funny

    For thousands of years, people thought the moon was made of cheese.

    But then we went there and found out it was made of rock.

    We haven't been back since.

    Behold the power of Cheese.

  32. JPL simulator by Killer+Instinct · · Score: 2, Informative

    You cant zoom in as well, but this is still worth a visit if you interested....

    --
    #include bier;
  33. Urban Legends by freeweed · · Score: 4, Informative

    Another urban legend re: Google earth and maps has been circulating recently. Several people have told me that the satellite imagery is intentionally old, because after 9/11 the US gov't passed a law saying no satellite photos newer than 2 years could be provided to the general public.

    This is of course hogwash. Google will actually tell you how current their data is (can't remember how to look this up at the moment), and besides, there are MANY instances of pretty new buildings and construction (well under a year old) that show up very clearly.

    I've even shown examples of this to people who know full well what date a building/overpass/etc went up, and they still insist on parroting this legend. Urban legends die hard.

    --
    Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    1. Re:Urban Legends by chris+macura · · Score: 2, Informative

      Looks like you had a radioactive waste spillage in the river... green AND blue! Rad.

      http://maps.google.com/maps?q=Berrien+Springs,+MI& ll=41.936038,-86.335298&spn=0.007308,0.010131&t=k& hl=en

  34. That's great and all but... by leblin · · Score: 2, Funny

    That's great and all but, where do i click to get driving directions?

  35. (Nearly) complete list of impacts and landings by Jivecat · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My site lists as many of the impacts and landings as I could find, both Russian and U.S. Despite the good info, its interface kind of sucks, particularly in light of Google's nice one -- looks like it's time to get hacking Google Moon.

    --
    "For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled."--Feynman
  36. One error by JeffTL · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "Imagery ©2005 NASA"?

    NASA is part of the US Federal Government, which does not hold copyrights -- its works are in the public domain.

    The correct tag would have been "©2005 Google - Imagery courtesy of NASA" or somesuch, but NASA can't hold a copyright.

    Other than that, interesting imagery with a good Easter egg.