Slashdot Mirror


Bully To Blacken Rockstar's Other Eye?

Tom writes "As if Hot Coffee wasn't enough for the reeling publisher, Gamespot has an article regarding the uproar starting over Rockstar's next game, Bully. Seems like the assault is coming from both sides of the pond, with anti-bullying advocates from England worried about the game causing kids to act out in classroom what they saw on the screen and with America's very own Jack Thompson calling upon Take-Two president Paul Eibeler to stop the release of the game. How will Rockstar handle the additional pressure being put upon it?"

113 comments

  1. How I hope Rockstar Responds by DarkHelmet · · Score: 2, Funny
    How will Rockstar handle the additional pressure being put upon it?

    To: Jack Thompson ESQ.
    From: Rockstar Games
    Subject: Bully Boycott.

    Dear Jack:

    Enclosed is a diagram that details whether or not we will stop development of our new game, Bully. Please feel free to peruse this diagram at your earliest convenience.

    Sincerely
    Rockstar Games

    --
    /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
    1. Re:How I hope Rockstar Responds by encopitt · · Score: 1

      Wow... It's been a really long time since I've seen anything that F*ing funny....

      Thanks. I needed that!

  2. My Letter to Rockstar by DarkHelmet · · Score: 2, Funny

    Dear Rockstar:

    I understand your recent trouble with GTA: San Andreas, and the hot coffee scandal. There are many on the religious right, and so called democratic left that disliked your consentual sex scenes within the game.

    I understand you're working on a new game called Bully. From what I understand so far, you can be a Bully within the game. This sounds quite interesting, but any sort of consentual sexuality that might creep into the game might once again offend the censors.

    In response, I suggest the following:

    • Add a easter egg that contains a minigame where a bully sodomizes a nerd with a broomstick.
    • Add molesting teachers within the schoolgrounds (This will appeal to the catholic clergy).
    • For nude models, please include a cheat code to remove the blur. Please also include labia, nipples, and all those other things. After playing Sims2, I feel cheated.

    Thank you very much for reading this letter. You have my full support.

    Sincerely,
    A loyal fan

    --
    /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
    1. Re:My Letter to Rockstar by QuantumG · · Score: 1

      It's set in a boys reform school. So surely gang rape and circle jerks are necessary to maintain immersion.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    2. Re:My Letter to Rockstar by wodeh · · Score: 1

      If Sims2 cheated you, then try Singles 2... it might be the single most irritating and retarded giggle-inspiring game ever created... but it's got nudity and sex, which always sells!

      --
      Gadgetoid.com - Gadgets & Games Journalism
    3. Re:My Letter to Rockstar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Add a easter egg that contains a minigame where a bully sodomizes a nerd with a broomstick...

      ... says the nerd posting to Slashdot.

  3. seriously..... by Lehk228 · · Score: 1

    why are these idiots making a big deal of this game, if nobody said anything i doubt the game would end up popular, now it's the game 'they are trying to ban' so everyone wants to play it now.

    --
    Snowden and Manning are heroes.
    1. Re:seriously..... by FidelCatsro · · Score: 1

      Or are they working for Rockstar's PR department .
      What i find most amusing is that a large group of Anti-bullying advocates are joining together and putting pressure on Rockstar to not release a game with threats of "Think of the children" and legal action .
      Ah beautiful irony , unless i misunderstood what bullying is .

      --
      The only things certain in war are Propaganda and Death. You can never be sure which is which though
    2. Re:seriously..... by badasscat · · Score: 1

      why are these idiots making a big deal of this game, if nobody said anything i doubt the game would end up popular, now it's the game 'they are trying to ban' so everyone wants to play it now.

      Yeah, because it's not as if Rockstar makes popular games or anything, controversy or no controversy.

      Why do people keep saying stuff like this? Do you realize you're just regurgitating the same arguments people have been making for 50 years, regardless of whether or not the argument actually applies?

      Here's a news flash: Rockstar has a PR department. They also spend a lot of money on marketing and advertising. Their games sell whether or not there's controversy. Go look up the sales numbers of the utterly bland and generally inferior Midnight Club 3 if you don't believe it - there is no way that game deserved to sell as many copies as it did. Yet how many calls for its banning did you see? It sold because of good marketing and some good promotional tie-ins - like every other Rockstar game.

      I just wish people would put this "if nobody tried to ban it, nobody would buy it!" argument to rest. It just doesn't apply. People are going to buy Rockstar's games regardless of anything, and the days when something would sell just because of controversy are long gone (just look at the sales of BMX XXX or The Guy Game if you don't believe it). People buy games because of good marketing and hopefully because the game is good (though that's apparently not always a prerequisite).

    3. Re:seriously..... by Zediker · · Score: 0

      actually that is kinda untrue, at least in regards to the music industry. Back when tipper gore went on her tirade about music lyrics in modern music to the senate and resulted in the 'parental avisory' label. The sales for music carying that label actually skyrocketed, defeating the actualy purpose the label was created for. The saying "There is no such thing as bad publicity" is very true, at least when it comes to music. It wouldnt be that much of a stretch to say it could easily apply to videogames as well. The value of the current editions of GTA:SA has almost surely gone up, and will continue to increase in value as the market becomes filled with the updated version Rockstar is working on.

      --
      I love to slaughter the english language.
    4. Re:seriously..... by Flendon · · Score: 1

      That is why Rockstar loves Thompson. They know they can always count on him for advertising. As it is I'm sure that Rockstar left the Hot Coffee code in for just this reason. I wouldn't be surprised if he was on Rockstars payroll and some of his lawsuits and his public denouncments are just staged.

      --
      chown -R us ./base
  4. The Game by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

    Right now the game is only worth some moms complain, and Hilary Clinton's time. If Dubya Bush himself put the war on Iraq aside and hold a conference on this game, then you know it's damn good. I'll get my wallet ready right after that.

    For those who have really read the reviews of "Bully". I think at most it would do is match the sales of "RedDead Revolver" or "Manhunt" without enough media attention.

    1. Re:The Game by king+wilson · · Score: 0

      where are these "Reviews"of Bully you are talking about?

          The game doesn't come out for another 3 months (assuming they even make the vague "October" street date)

          Rockstar has been pretty tight-lipped about it, other than some basic plot details.

          The only reason this is in the news now, is because douchebag Jack Thompson needs something to issue press releases about, now that Hot Coffee has been taken care of. He tried to take on the Sims 2, but even the press was to smart to fall for that one......

              in '92, I watched him debate Professor Griff from Public Enemy, about the evils of Rap Music. He was a tool then, and he's a tool now....

    2. Re:The Game by assassinator42 · · Score: 1

      From what I've heard, Jack Thompson is very childish. He thinks people who play games are retarded drooling monkeys. He compared one person to Saddam Hussein just because he played games. All of his posts would be -1 if he posted here, ;). And, of course, I'd wager he cares nothing about the children. He just cares about the money. Maybe he decided he wasn't getting enough from the medical malpractice suits, and decided the game companies were a good rich new target.

    3. Re:The Game by Reignking · · Score: 1

      This reminds me of churches coming out against the movie Dogma -- no one had seen it and it wasn't due out for months, but someone got a rough, rough copy of the script, and decided that the movie was blasphemous.

      --
      One man's Funny is another man's Offtopic.
    4. Re:The Game by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      I was just reading game informer magazine. It's more of a preview than a review sorry for confusion.

    5. Re:The Game by BenEnglishAtHome · · Score: 1

      Good point. What's weird, though, is the way so many religious organizations continued to fight against that movie *after* it came out. The thing ended with God being, well, God - perfect, all-knowing, all-powerful, and merciful. It repeatedly made the point that individual interpretations of scripture can be twisted all sorts of weird ways by all sorts of people for all sorts of reasons but, in the end, there would be a perfect God, setting it all right.

      I thought it was a seriously uplifting, pro-God kind of movie. Yet even after they'd had a chance to see it, some religious groups still hated it. I don't understand why.

  5. First Obvious Remark On Weirdness by fm6 · · Score: 1

    So it's OK to jack cars, attack and kill people to steal their money, drive a cab so fast that pedestrians have no hope of getting out of the way, take work as a hitman, blow police helicopters out of the sky, etc., etc. But having sex is very very bad, and bullying is beyond the pale.

    1. Re:First Obvious Remark On Weirdness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So it's OK to jack cars, attack and kill people to steal their money, drive a cab so fast that pedestrians have no hope of getting out of the way, take work as a hitman, blow police helicopters out of the sky, etc., etc. But having sex is very very bad, and bullying is beyond the pale.

      Great! Now you're going to get the carjacking, killing, theft, vehicular manslaughter, contract killing, and mass murder taken out of our games.

      Thanks for nothing!

    2. Re:First Obvious Remark On Weirdness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't forget, the game allows you to pick up prostitutes and kill them, after you're done, for your money back.

      I guess the soccer moms and senators don't approve of CJ getting a girlfriend and having safe, consentual sex.

    3. Re:First Obvious Remark On Weirdness by sneakers563 · · Score: 1

      Why does this keep getting posted? Are you seriously telling us that you aren't aware of the insane amount of criticism the violence in the GTA games has received these last few years from grandstanding politicians and self-appointed cultural guardians? You and I probably agree that the government should stop wasting its time legislating taste, but you can't call them hypocrites. They openly want to control what you see and hear, and that includes violence as well as sex. These are the same people who have been braying about violence in video games since the beginning of time; I'm sure they haven't changed their minds.

    4. Re:First Obvious Remark On Weirdness by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 1

      They openly want to control what you see and hear, and that includes violence as well as sex.

      No, it doesn't attempt to control those things openly. As just explained, GTA:SA already portrayed extreme levels of violence and criminality. To call the protagonist a "drug-peddling serial-killer" is putting it lightly. Yet all of that deserves a lower rating than a single scene of softcore, consensual heterosexual intercourse.

      When the game was only ludicrously ultra-violent, it was allowed in stores. But when it also was noticed to contain a realistic amount of normal sex, it was pulled from the shelves.

      It isn't a newsflash that the USA senslessly treats media-sex as worse than media-violence, but it also doesn't hurt any to repeatedly point this out.

    5. Re:First Obvious Remark On Weirdness by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Oops, you're completely correct. Like everyone else here, my short-term memory is impaired...

    6. Re:First Obvious Remark On Weirdness by sneakers563 · · Score: 1
      You won't get any argument from me that the ratings system, and American values in general, aren't broken. However, it's disengenuous to suggest that until the Hot Coffee scandal Jack Thompson and all the politicians weighing in recently were "OK" with the level of violence. They weren't, and furthermore, I don't see anyone here saying thank God for Jack Thompson standing up against ludicrous ultra-violence in video games. Instead, there's a bunch of accusations of hypocracy, and all I'm saying is that they're not hypocrites. They'd like to ban video games both for sex and for violence.

      Also, I'm not sure I'd call sex between two fully clothed people "normal". ;)

    7. Re:First Obvious Remark On Weirdness by Hydrogenoid · · Score: 1

      To call the protagonist a "drug-peddling serial-killer" is putting it wrongly.
      GTA:SA (at least its hero) is definitely anti drugs, especially crack cocaine.

    8. Re:First Obvious Remark On Weirdness by Dachannien · · Score: 1

      Even though I'm feeding a troll, I'd just like to mention that most of the behavior shown in GTA:SA is unlikely to be duplicated by most of the players, because nearly all kids have the good sense not to kill people. The ones who do get involved in those crimes IRL have problems in their lives going far beyond a video game.

      On the other hand, many kids already show a propensity for bullying others, and while a game like Bully won't necessarily cause kids to bully others, it does convey the message that bullying people is okay. It's the same with Tony Hawk Underground 2, where vandalism is combined with a fun and cool sport and thus is shown to be okay; many kids also already show a propensity for vandalism, and making it seem like a cool thing to do is likely to contribute to kids actually going out and doing it.

      While I'm not saying the game companies shouldn't be allowed to make these games - in fact, I think they have the right to - they should also acknowledge that there are social implications to games of this sort, and that making and releasing these games to the public in such a way that impressionable kids can get them without parental involvement may be irresponsible (and that applies not only to the developers, but to the marketers and the retailers as well).

    9. Re:First Obvious Remark On Weirdness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Errr, no. It's just you. Grand Theft Auto games always attract an immense amount of criticism from myriad Christian groups.

    10. Re:First Obvious Remark On Weirdness by fm6 · · Score: 1
      Why are you so sure you're feeding a troll? My previous comments were honest opinions, even if they were poorly informed -- as I've already admitted. And I happen to agree with everything you just said.

      People are too quick to yell "troll!" Doing so means you don't give people a chance to correct their mistakes. Worse, it means you don't give a fair hearing to opinions you don't already share.

      Of course, if you err the other way, every once in a while you're going to gratify a real troll. Bad for the ego. But what's more important, your ego, or honestly sharing ideas?

    11. Re:First Obvious Remark On Weirdness by westlake · · Score: 1
      So it's OK to jack cars, attack and kill people to steal their moneytake work as a hitman, blow police, etc., etc. But having sex is very very bad, and bullying is beyond the pale

      The gangster games appeal to a young male demographic and to no one else.

    12. Re:First Obvious Remark On Weirdness by stoborrobots · · Score: 1

      People are too quick to yell "troll!" Doing so means you don't give people a chance to correct their mistakes. Worse, it means you don't give a fair hearing to opinions you don't already share....
      --
      Since ACs tend to be trolls, I tend to ignore them. If you really have something serious to say to me, please log in.

      I don't really think anything serious of it, but the juxtaposition of this comment and your sig is somewhat comical...
    13. Re:First Obvious Remark On Weirdness by fm6 · · Score: 1

      Actually, my sig is a total lie. I read ACs all the time. I just got tired of all the ACs who made braindead kneejerk responses to my posts.

    14. Re:First Obvious Remark On Weirdness by stoborrobots · · Score: 1

      Actually, my sig is a total lie. I read ACs all the time.

      Yeah, that's what I expected... It's the kind of comment that I'd make too, despite the fact that I read at -1, nested, with no score modifiers...

  6. silly idea by nomadic · · Score: 1

    How will Rockstar handle the additional pressure being put upon it?

    Start making games that don't appeal only to what is worst in humanity?

    1. Re:silly idea by QuantumG · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Lemonade? Please. I made it just for you. You are my best friend. Mm, this really hits the spot. Doesn't it, though. You make really good lemonade, Scratchy.
      Oh, thank you, Itchy.

      --
      How we know is more important than what we know.
    2. Re:silly idea by Volvogga · · Score: 1

      Which disturbs you more? That Rockstar makes the games, or that people buy them?

      Humanities dark side is more intriguing to me and many other people. Sales show it. And when is the last time you saw a study on the behavior of people with the characteristics of a monk or saint as opposed to the severly depressed or psychotic?

      --
      Vol~
    3. Re:silly idea by nomadic · · Score: 1

      Which disturbs you more? That Rockstar makes the games, or that people buy them?

      Neither disturbs me especially, I was simply remarking that's something that Rockstar can do to avoid criticism.

      Humanities dark side is more intriguing to me and many other people. Sales show it. And when is the last time you saw a study on the behavior of people with the characteristics of a monk or saint as opposed to the severly depressed or psychotic?

      The best games are the ones that have some sort of ethical or philosophical component. Ultima, Ico, FF, Deus Ex, etc. Rockstar has an immensely talented development team, it would be nice to see them try to transcend the gratuitous violence and make something more important. And the psychotic really aren't that interesting or that deep.

    4. Re:silly idea by Volvogga · · Score: 1

      Sorry about that. I took your post to be of a lot of the self-ritious crap I hear and read everyday and responded in kind, and from your reply I see that not to be the case. Also, when I said psychotic, I was refering more to individuals who are moraly and ethically squewed in comparison to the general populace, but are more or less sane in their general thinking and logic (very general). I, personally, find that interesting.

      --
      Vol~
    5. Re:silly idea by j-turkey · · Score: 1
      Start making games that don't appeal only to what is worst in humanity?

      I sure hope that they don't do this. I like games with an ethical or philosophical component too, but they certainly exist. There is also a place in the markey for dark and immersive games. Perhaps part of the issue is that Rockstar does such a great job of filling their niche (gameplay, production, storyline), which really adds to their widespread popularity. IMO, games like Postal don't hold a candle to the GTA series' gameplay. So if Rockstar wants to lean over under criticism, they will have two options: either start making crappy games, or make games where the player assumes the role of a "good guy".

      Personally, I find moral ambiguity refreshing in entertainment, whether it's in movies, books, TV, or video games...especially in a time when the morally elite crowd tend to be particularly vocal with moral absolutes. I hope that Rockstar keeps on doing what they're doing - that is, presuming that the "Hot Coffee" scandal really was accidental, and it really does require external patching to 'unlock' the content on disc.

      We are talking about the same thing, right? I assume you're not saying that their games only appeal to the people that represent the worst in humanity, but the content itself.

      --

      -Turkey

    6. Re:silly idea by Reignking · · Score: 1

      Eh, I'd rather see people beating the shit outta ho's in a game instead of real life...

      --
      One man's Funny is another man's Offtopic.
    7. Re:silly idea by dogbowl · · Score: 1

      c'mon mods. surely somebody on Slashdot gets the above.

      --

      These pretzels are making me thirsty.
    8. Re:silly idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd rather com mit a good question than play a game where I do so. On the other hand, can you say you'd rather actually commit a crime than emulate it? It's win-win, really. Poeple ACTUALLY do good deeds and FAKE bad deeds through violent games. So why appeal to the best of society, exactly?

    9. Re:silly idea by ureshii_akuma · · Score: 1

      Start making games that don't appeal only to what is worst in humanity?

      Obviously, they don't make games that appeal to the worst in humanity - they don't seem to be appealing to the politicians and lawyers.

    10. Re:silly idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      presuming that the "Hot Coffee" scandal really was accidental

      For all the money they spend on development and distribution, I hardly think shipping the content was an accident, even disabled.

    11. Re:silly idea by jtpalinmajere · · Score: 1

      I'd rather just not see someone beating the shit out of a prostitute at all... and if I *was* subjected to seeing it, I'd rather be the one beating the shit out of the criminal that just beat the shit out of a prostitute, and then helping the prostitute with getting medical attention or even a way out of her lifestyle (maybe she's trapped via blackmail and abuse to be a prostitute against her will).

      I simply don't buy the argument that people play games to do the bad things they can't do in real life, because I don't believe that most people play real life only to do good things. No, they're not criminals, but they're not saints either. How often has anyone here taken down a criminal drug ring, or saved the world from alien invasion, or a myriad of other things that can be considered *good*. Games exist to let people do the things they can't (or probably wouldn't if they could) do in real life. Notice the omission of the word "bad". So then, if a developer chooses to create a game that lets someone do the bad things as opposed to a game that lets someone do the good things, what does that say about them?

      I'm not saying that banning a game for violence or whatnot is appropriate... that's honestly outside the jurisdiction of the government IMO. However in the case of Rockstar, defending the games without acknowledging that the motives of its developers are despicable at best is equally deplorable.

    12. Re:silly idea by schnell · · Score: 1

      I'd rather be the one beating the shit out of the criminal that just beat the shit out of a prostitute, and then helping the prostitute with getting medical attention or even a way out of her lifestyle (maybe she's trapped via blackmail and abuse to be a prostitute against her will).

      Yes, I'm sure that GTA: Social Worker as you have described above will be a multi-platinum success. Perhaps it can also have exciting mini-games where you provide the prostitute with restaurant vocational training, or where you pay off your grad school student loans. Perhaps you could also suggest to Midway that "Mortal Kombat" games would be vastly improved if the two combatants did small-group self-esteem therapy exercises with each other rather than fighting.

      --
      "95% of all Slashdot .sig quotes are incorrect or completely fabricated." -Benjamin Franklin
  7. Stupid arguments... by ScaryFroMan · · Score: 1
    "A check of Internet web sites today reveals that Wal-Mart, GameStop, ToysRUs, and Amazon.com are all presently pre-selling the game with no questions asked as to age of the buyers," Thompson said in a statement.

    Yeah. Cause we all know that most twelve-year-olds have credit cards.

    --
    In Soviet Russia, backwards is everything.
    1. Re:Stupid arguments... by Reignking · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Cause we all know that most twelve-year-olds have credit cards.

      It was easy enough for Santos L. Halper...

      --
      One man's Funny is another man's Offtopic.
    2. Re:Stupid arguments... by Maffyew · · Score: 1

      You don't need a credit card to preorder if you're preordering in the store itself, as opposed to online - a cash deposit is usually adequate.

    3. Re:Stupid arguments... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And whoever's running the register can obviously see that a 12 year old kid is standing there and not an 18+ adult. Even though most games aren't rated long before their launch, I can assume without too much deduction that Bully is going to be either M (or considering the hassle over GTA, possibly AO).

      Does anyone know if stores like EB and Gamestop can deny preordering games to people underage?

  8. I want this game by secondsun · · Score: 1

    I get to play a pissed off kid who gets to go ape at his school? Man this sounds better than my 36 hours of Punisher. (See Journal)

    --
    There is nothing wrong with being gay. It's getting caught where the trouble lies.
  9. Unrateable Ratings by fembots · · Score: 1

    This is actually quite interesting, as bullying probably won't be rated anything more than PG.

    Will we see ratings for racism, sexism, political and other similar behaviors? These are non-sexual and non-violent, yet they can have great, if not greater, impact on people's life.

    1. Re:Unrateable Ratings by stonecypher · · Score: 1

      Will we see ratings for racism, sexism, political and other similar behaviors?

      What is this, 1986? Have you looked at a game box since we all learned who Tipper Gore was? Did you not realize those letters meant things?

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
  10. The UK anti-bullying website by hackwrench · · Score: 1

    Taking a look at their website, it's a little unclear whether they are there to help the victims of bullying, or to help kids become bullies and to help the parents help their kids become bullies.

    I mean, what do you think when you read "Practical help and advice for parents who are tackling school bullying."

  11. How will Rockstar handle the pressure? by dave-tx · · Score: 2, Insightful
    How will Rockstar handle the additional pressure being put upon it?

    Probably by watching their profits rise to an all-time high. Nothing beats free advertising.

    --

    >> "What would the robut do? Frame someone!"

    1. Re:How will Rockstar handle the pressure? by DeepCerulean · · Score: 1

      Damnit...if I had mod points I'd mod you down like it was nobody's business...have you seen Take-Two's stock price lately? That's all from the "free advertising" that the hot coffee mod generated. I think their investors have had just about all the "free advertising" they care to handle...and if you don't think those losses will trickle down to the development house that caused them (one way or another), then you should be running for president...

    2. Re:How will Rockstar handle the pressure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rent a sense of humor when you get your next paycheck.

    3. Re:How will Rockstar handle the pressure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're implying that the parent post was a joke, then it was the least funny thing I've ever read on the entire Internet.

      And I downloaded and read the entire Internet a few weeks ago.

    4. Re:How will Rockstar handle the pressure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It certainly wasn't funny, but it certainly didn't sound like a serious commentary. The reply, however, was a laughable overreaction deserving of a lame Prozac joke.

    5. Re:How will Rockstar handle the pressure? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      those losses

      Losses? LOSSES? You think Take Two lost a single cent because their stock price went down? What, was Take Two investing in itself? No, pansy-ass investors selling stock to each other in the great big ponzi scheme/popularity contest/circle jerk called "the stock market" are the only ones that had any "losses". If they're sad they couldn't find a stupid fuck to foist their worthless pieces of paper (these days they don't even get paper, do they? Stock is as virtual as my Enchanted Epic Holy Vorpal Dick +3 vs. Asshats like you) onto for more than they paid, well, I know of a few tall buildings with roof access they could use.

      Wake me when a Take Two title doesn't move millions. Then we'll talk about Take Two's "losses".

    6. Re:How will Rockstar handle the pressure? by dave-tx · · Score: 1
      have you seen Take-Two's stock price lately?

      Uh, the current stock price has nothing to do with sales. I don't know where "official" sales numbers are, but GTA is currently Amazon's 2nd highest selling title. Do you really beleive that all of the current hype has no effect on sales figures?

      ..and if you don't think those losses will trickle down to the development house that caused them (one way or another), then you should be running for president..

      Oh, I get it - this was just an excuse to make a silly ad-hominem attack.

      --

      >> "What would the robut do? Frame someone!"

    7. Re:How will Rockstar handle the pressure? by badasscat · · Score: 1

      Uh, the current stock price has nothing to do with sales. I don't know where "official" sales numbers are, but GTA is currently Amazon's 2nd highest selling title.

      And it was #1 before the controversy.

      It was also in the top 5 at EB and Best Buy. It's no longer even on the list at those stores.

      You're still going to tell us controversy always helps sales?

    8. Re:How will Rockstar handle the pressure? by dave-tx · · Score: 1
      You're still going to tell us controversy always helps sales?

      Don't be stupid, I'm not saying always. So it was #1, and now is #2, behind something that's listed as pre-order only. The controversy didn't knock it out of the top spot, a new release did.

      --

      >> "What would the robut do? Frame someone!"

  12. Nobody bugs anyone in the movie industry by vasqzr · · Score: 1

    If they do, it's not on the news like this.

    They should make a 'Passion of the Christ' video game. You can be Jesus or his sacrificers.

    1. Re:Nobody bugs anyone in the movie industry by sneakers563 · · Score: 1

      Speaking of which, I just have to plug this review. I don't know how they managed it, but our little free weekly rag has one of the best reviewers I've ever read.

    2. Re:Nobody bugs anyone in the movie industry by Pxtl · · Score: 1

      I still say they need to stop pussyfooting around with this medium-evil crap and go whole hog.

      Sim Auschwitz.

  13. Rockstar by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 1

    Make games which piss people off but play well. They've done that the entire GTA series and it works for them.

    Bitch and whine all you like but GTA is a damn fine game and that's why it sells. If you don't like it make a better game with none of the violence and outshine GTA every time they release a new one.

    --
    I like muppets.
    1. Re:Rockstar by milkman_matt · · Score: 1

      Bitch and whine all you like but GTA is a damn fine game and that's why it sells. If you don't like it make a better game with none of the violence and outshine GTA every time they release a new one.

      Y'know, now that you mention it, here's something I forgot to bring up in all of the other GTA posts. I just got SA about.. a month ago, now that's not a very quick response time. I never got into GTA3 at all, didn't even bother, but Vice City quickly became one of my vices (Heh, couldn't resist) ..In any case, I'm a big fan of the ol' gangster movies (not to be confused with gangsta' movies) and one of those being Scarface, when VC came out I was absolutely hooked, I couldn't get enough of that game. It was so damned perfect, there's nothing I didn't like about it.. the story was great, the game advancement was great, just nothing I would improve on.

      Then SA came out and I saw the previews and thought "Great... they've gone and turned a great scarface type game into boyz in the f'ing hood.. way to go dickheads" I had the lowest possible expectations for SA you could imagine until a friend let me borrow it, and it took some work for him to get me to accept it, I was that disinterested. Anyhow, after about 6 straight hours of play after getting home I couldn't believe how much better than VC this game actually was.

      GTA:SA is popular not because of all of the 'free advertising via scandals', it's popular because it's a godamned -brilliant- game, totally immersive and gives you so much freedom it's unbelievable, cars, bikes, helicopters, jets, shit if i felt like getting across the map (which takes time in a car, less in a bike) and I was near an airport i could take one of my planes, fly there, and jump out and friggin' skydive if I wanted to, who was thinking the GTA series would advance so much when they played GTA3 or VC? I've got to give it to Rockstar, I went into this game bound and determined to hate it no matter what the game threw at me, but I'm even more into this game than my beloved Vice City. Hell i've already BEAT it and I still can't stop playing..

      ONE THING though, If I were a parent, this game wouldn't have made it past the INTRO before I told my kid they couldn't play it (but I'd sure as hell be playing it) Great game for adults, bad for kids, fun beyond most other games on the market these days, and so what if it sets a bad example, those of us old enough to play it already know it's just a game.

      That being said, I loved the FP on this story, and I agree with it 100%, those anti-bullying activists need to go do something aside from trying to police video games, and I for one, will be at least trying out Bully once it makes it into the stores, and I'm sure it will. ...Shit that went on forever, sorry about the rant, but I'm way too tired to be bothered with cleaning it up, so that's my story and I'm stickin' to it.

    2. Re:Rockstar by |/|/||| · · Score: 1
      Huh. I just don't get it. Maybe I didn't play it long enough, but the controls in VC drove me nuts. I played it for a few hours and then gave it up - if I remember correctly it was hard to look around and you couldn't aim. WTF? Maybe it's because the only other Rockstar game that I've played is Red Dead Revolver (which has excellent controls, IMO) and I went into GTA expecting the controls to be the same. I'll admit that the driving was fun, but every time I got involved in a shootout it pissed me off to no end.

      --
      [javac] 100 errors
    3. Re:Rockstar by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 1

      Funny you say that. I said EXACTLY the same.

      "Great it sold out to the YO YO YO NIGGAH! bullshit rap is infested with". I got it for christmas, didn't like it much and went "nah, it can wait till ToS is finished". I finished Tales of symphonia and went back to it, after the first hour or so I adored it as much as I used to vice city. It starts out way too "wannabe black" (best way to put it) but once you relise CJ is the anti "wannabe black" it makes more sense. Then the map starts to open up and you relise just how much of an idiot you were.

      Bully doesn't intrest me, but I'll see how it turns out then see if I want to get it.

      As for the kids thing. Let them try it. I grew up watching horror films, playing violent games, sitting up till midnight when I was 8. But I knew if I tied anything stupid my dad would kick my ass for it. So I didn't and I grew up knowing better then to steal cars.

      The key to playing violent games as a kid is knowing they are games. I mean if you don't get that why arn't I eating magic mushrooms and jumping on turtles? :)

      --
      I like muppets.
    4. Re:Rockstar by Turn-X+Alphonse · · Score: 1

      you use lock on to aim. It makes things simple.

      Controls are all really "this works, that's all you're getting". You also use the second contorl stick to look around :)

      Tis all simple really. Some like it, some don't. Tis how it goes.

      --
      I like muppets.
  14. er.. by OmgTEHMATRICKS · · Score: 1

    From the articles I've read, you're not the bully, you stand up to them. Yes, you can kick the crud out of mean teachers.. but the game seems to be about a badass kid who goes to school, people pick on him, and then EVERYONE finds out they've messed with the wrong kid. He beats the shit out of bullies and gets justice on evil teachers. And yes, I Would imagine politicians would still be up in arms about this - afterall, like prisons, in school you're punished when you defend yourself.

    1. Re:er.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was never punished for taking my revenge on teaches, and bullies, and assclowns. I was given week long vacations. LOL.

  15. How will Rockstar handle the additional pressure? by 77Punker · · Score: 1

    They'll probably give up their lunch money and run away crying!

  16. Does it matter who whines? by thebroken · · Score: 1

    Who cares? It will sell, and that is all that matters for them most likely.

  17. How I would respond by Landshark17 · · Score: 0

    Give Thompson the finger, then refer him to my constitutional right to say whatever the hell I want, then nod proudly when he calls me a "First Amendment Absolutist," because I am.

    --
    This sig is false.
    1. Re:How I would respond by XXIstCenturyBoy · · Score: 1

      RTFA. That Jack seems to have a point this time and he is not targeting Take Two but the retailler that allow preorder without any age check.

      And he is right. It will be a M rated game, and even if it SHOULD be the parent's responsability to check what their kids buy, especially online, retailer have some sort of responsability. They took upon themselves to be responsible about rating the minute they decided to pull out AO game from their shelves.

      Nothing to do with the oh so sacred First Amendment.

    2. Re:How I would respond by Mithrandir86 · · Score: 1

      There's really no need to online, as most credit cards have age requirements.

  18. Here we go again... by ex_ottoyuhr · · Score: 1

    Is anyone else here heartily sick of Rockstar's "Sell Games by Moral Panic" strategy yet?

    All the more so since, judging from Manhunt at least, it really doesn't seem to have much of an effect on sales; a good Rockstar game sells well, a bad one sells poorly, and the furor raised over all of them doesn't make much of a difference at the cash register. What it _does_ do is create a horrible reputation for the game industry as a whole. Just once, I'd like to see them do something _not_ designed to give Hillary Clinton a heart attack...

    1. Re:Here we go again... by Zeussy · · Score: 1

      I'd like to see them do something _not_ designed to give Hillary Clinton a heart attack...
      How about Theme Hospital 2?
    2. Re:Here we go again... by ValuJet · · Score: 1
      Just once, I'd like to see them do something _not_ designed to give Hillary Clinton a heart attack...

      Just once, I'd like to see them succeed.

    3. Re:Here we go again... by ex_ottoyuhr · · Score: 1

      With heart attack or without?

    4. Re:Here we go again... by Bloftis · · Score: 1

      Hillary Clinton will have a heart attack about anything the democrats see fit. It is all just a ploy to try to win the presidency!

  19. Am i missing something? by insertwackynamehere · · Score: 0

    wait wait, i saw this and for once disagreed with a video game, having been bullied myself in middle school (yes people who read slashdot have been bullied before!) and i thought it was kind of thoughtless. But then I read the article. It says you STAND UP to bullies, and play pranks on the bad kids. This means that the people arguing are probably the people who are FOR bullying so wtf I'm confused. Are they defending bullying and saying this game goes against bullies?? That makes no sense

  20. in the UK... by nickos · · Score: 1

    In the UK there's currently a really stupid and nasty "craze" called happy slapping which started as a form of bullying in schools but progressed onto the high-street. Many people think that happy slapping was inspired by a TV program called Trigger Happy TV and I can imagine a lot of people in the UK getting upset that a game like this might encourage more of the same.

    For some reason I find myself reminded of A Clockwork Orange...

    1. Re:in the UK... by Detritus · · Score: 1

      I can't wait for a group of these hooligans to "happy slap" some SAS commando home on leave.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  21. How can they make judgements before playing it? by techstar25 · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of all the protesters who kept saying the Kevin Smith's movie Dogma was was disgusting and a slap in the face to the Catholic church. When protesters were asked if they'd seen it, they said "No".

    This game hasn't even been released yet. Why we wait to see what the game is actually about first.

    1. Re:How can they make judgements before playing it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I still like that Kevin Smith was outside a movie theatre in his home town and protested Dogma when it first opened. It really shows the brains of these people.

  22. Such a dilemma! by amarc · · Score: 1

    "How will Rockstar handle the additional pressure being put upon it?" Probably by gut laughing all the way to the bank...

  23. down with censorship by czarangelus · · Score: 1

    These events are just a backhanded attempt to censor Rockstar. Of course, given the current march of freedom in this country, it's probably only a matter of time before they get shut down.

    --
    When a true genius appears, you can know him by this sign: that all the dunces are in a confederacy against him.
  24. Rockstar should be shutdown. by mizzoubear56 · · Score: 1

    Rockstar doesn't make fun games. It makes crappy un original games and then also makes games just to be controversial. Rockstar reminds me of the hicks at school acting like they're rebels. They have a burst of success at times, then they get shut down either violently or quietly.

    1. Re:Rockstar should be shutdown. by SPY_jmr1 · · Score: 1

      ...Says you. I disagree. But neither of us is more right then the other, are we?

    2. Re:Rockstar should be shutdown. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      But neither of us is more right then the other, are we?

      Well, since your comment is backed by millions of sells and high ratings on different rating sites... Why not ask the parent poster to crawl into a hole and die ?

    3. Re:Rockstar should be shutdown. by SPY_jmr1 · · Score: 1

      I really don't care? Apathy? Take your pick, :p

  25. Ghosts of the past by shoptroll · · Score: 1

    Jack Thompson must've had a rough time in grade school or something.

    --
    Insert Sig Here
  26. MOD PARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Honestly, have any of you other than this guy actually RTFA?

  27. You guys do realize..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That your not the bully in this game. Your the victim that gets pissed off about being bullied by everybody. While I may agree that fighting isnt the best action in all situations, I really dont understand how this is viewed as something "immoral". I mean, what are these people worried about, that a kid who is always getting bully is actually going to stand up to the bullies due to their playing of this game, because god knows I dont want that to happen....

  28. Maybe I'm completly wrong... by CashCarSTAR · · Score: 1

    Maybe I'm completly wrong. I don't know. My memory is kinda vague on this....but...well. Here's Gamespy's capsule of the game.

    "You're not going to take it anymore. From edgy publisher Rockstar's Vancouver development team comes this dark comedy set in the most vile and sadistic setting yet in a Rockstar videogame: the schoolyard. As a troublesome schoolboy, you'll laugh and cringe as you stand up to bullies, get picked on by teachers, play pranks on malicious kids, win or lose the girl, and ultimately learn to navigate the obstacles of the fictitious reform school, Bullworth Academy."

    And how exactly does that promote bullying? Seems to me that the bullies are the bad guys in this. You're playing average joe student that's trying to make it from being the bullied to being the star, so to speak.

    I just don't see the problem with this. In fact, as far a socially responsible games go, I suspect this isn't even near the bottom of the list. I suspect it'll end up being near the top.

    1. Re:Maybe I'm completly wrong... by iainl · · Score: 1

      There you go again, using facts. Why do you have to insist on using the facts? Can't we just express moral outrage anyway? No-one ever got a fucking shitload of votes from morons by stating the boring facts.

      My only complaint about the game so far is that it sounds like a complete ripoff of the Spectrum classic 'Skool Daze'.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
  29. Just a minute... by AccUser · · Score: 1

    Is it not the case that the nerds who actually play computer games are usually the ones being bullied, rather than those who bully?

    --

    Any fool can talk, but it takes a wise man to listen.

  30. schoolchidren by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 1
    According to Thompson, two busloads of Washington, DC schoolchildren will protest the game's release, though it was not clear what organization was promoting or funding the demonstration.
    This is just outrageous. They drag in a bunch of kids to demonstrate for their cause. Children are easy targets, easy to influence. How about they brought adults, the kind that actualy knows what it's talking about, not just the kind that wants to prove they're more moralistic than their neighbours. But ofcourse those aren't available to him, as they are protesting against real bad things, not just some trivial thing, abused by some media-hungry dick who wants to make himself a big name without too much trouble or risk.
  31. Bullying Online: A Bunch of Sanctimonious Wankers by BenjyD · · Score: 1

    Bullying is not a suitable topic for a computer game. In term time this charity is contacted by up to four suicidal pupils a day. Between 16-20 children a year kill themselves in the UK due to school bullying. Amusing subject for a game isn't it?

    What a bunch of self-righteous wankers. A huge fraction of films/books/games deal with horrible subjects. Should we ban *every* film/book/game that doesn't involve everyone just being nice to each other?

    They'll be protesting against Itchy and Scratchy and Michelangelo's David next...

  32. look to Valve... by leland242 · · Score: 1

    If Rockstar wants to continue making games that cause controversy they should look at Valve.

    No need for ratings if you distribute the game yourself...

    I would think Rockstar, with some minimal advertising, could pull this off. They have enough brand recognition to pull it off...although I suppose this would make them just a PC game maker...which wouldn't be very good for their profit margin.

    Does the ps2 have a "seal of approval" or whatever for their games? Or can anyone release something? Or is it more a licensing thing?

    1. Re:look to Valve... by LilBlackDemon · · Score: 1

      Sony, Microsoft, and Nintendo make their profits on consoles from game sales, and as such charge 3rd party developers a fee should they wish to run software on the console. It is one of several reasons why the current-generation consoles contain copyright/DRM chips.

  33. Sounds familiar... by BlightThePower · · Score: 1

    This game sounds somewhat like it was inpsired by the old ZX Spectrum titles "Skooldaze" and the sequel "Bak to skool" both of which were very innovative and excellent fun. Very popular (in the UK at least) and pretty regularly in people's Top 10 and Top 5 picks of retrogames. Not surprised these ideas are being revisisted, whatever else happens in families and work, school is the universal experience after all.

    --
    Plays violent online games as: Nerfherder76
  34. 5,000 years of Civilization by vertinox · · Score: 1

    Oh noes! 5,000 years of civilization and video games are bringing about this thing called "bullying". I mean children have not been tormenting each other for all this time without the aid of electronic magic boxes? Also, this crime and sex thing you speak of... I'm quite positive it never existed either until video games and rock and roll existed. Humanity was quite perfect and free from sin until the 1980's! If we banned everything that transmits electronic media I'm sure everything would be just fine and peachy.

    --
    "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
    -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
  35. The standard reply to this: by mindaktiviti · · Score: 1

    Is....*drum roll*

    In a movie, you're watching actors play the parts. In a game, you are playing the part. So Catholics and Christians could potentially say "This game is evil because you're allowed to beat on Jesus", especially if you get points or some sort of reward for beating on Jesus. And honestly, I could see their point for the game not being appropriate (i.e. it'd be just like a game where you're a nazi and you get to execute jewish people).

    However, regardless of the innappropriate nature, I personally would not want something like that to be banned simply because it upsets people, because then it would just set a precedent and you would have people telling you what's appropriate and what's not.

    Actually, my gf is very much against this whole hot coffee scandal, and we don't agree with each others point of view, but she did mention one thing that was interesting:

    If GTA:SA had rabbis and jewish people, or other obvious minorities, then those people would be up in arms over racism (i.e. Hatians & Vice City), but the same is not true when women are being objectified and you're rewarded for beating down a prostitute.

    1. Re:The standard reply to this: by PygmySurfer · · Score: 1

      This game is evil because you're allowed to beat on Jesus", especially if you get points or some sort of reward for beating on Jesus. And honestly, I could see their point for the game not being appropriate (i.e. it'd be just like a game where you're a nazi and you get to execute jewish people).

      I want to play both of these games, where do I get them?

  36. Enough is enough, I can't stands no more... by zerocommazero · · Score: 1
    You've got to remember that everyday people, those who don't play video games, those that are 35-40 and up in age still view video games as entertainment for kids. They say GTA, Bully, etc. is marketed to kids. Why? Because game stores will have posters up for them? Or video mags run ads for them? Well, I hate to tell ya, but not JUST kids read those mags or visit those stores! As a video games publisher, where would I correctly advertise my game other than the market it was created for?! BTW, I've never seen a TV ad for GTA run before 9 at night, and never on Nickelodeon, Disney, Cartoon Network, etc.

    Out of all this nonsense, the only thing i agree with is that the ratings system is failing. The ESRB must lay down the heavy hand and prove that it can handle it's own policing, thus keeping these clueless idiots from taking advantage of situations like this.

    How the hell did the movie industry get past crap like this? I believe the same/similar method should be used.

    And another thing, game stores SHOULD be held responsible for selling games directly to minors. There should be an age check done. Just like the movie theatres.

    If the ESRB asserted itself more and game stores enforced the age limits, then these instigators would have a less compelling argument to preach. Because no matter what spin they put on the stories of indecency in video games, a miniscule percentage of their complaints do make sense. So lets knock-out the credible arguments they do have...

    1. Re:Enough is enough, I can't stands no more... by Angry+Toad · · Score: 1

      ...those that are 35-40 and up in age still view video games as entertainment for kids...

      Excuse me? I think you're confused about video game history. I'm well past 40 and have been playing video games since I was about twelve years old. Myself, and plenty of people I know in our age group play and enjoy video games all the time.

      40 neq 60, just FYI.

  37. MOD PARENT REDUNDANT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm really getting tired of people posting "Ah, so killing people is okay, but consensual sex is unacceptable"

    I'm posting this as anonymous because I fear the wrath of those fatheads who are happy to keep reading the same sentence over and over again. I'm posting this as anonymous because I fear the wrath of those fatheads who are happy to keep reading the same sentence over and over again. I'm posting this as anonymous because I fear the wrath of those fatheads who are happy to keep reading the same sentence over and over again.

  38. Rockstar's Response by Dr.+Bent · · Score: 1

    In related news...

    Rockstar responded to bullying.co.uk's demands by stealing thier backpack, throwing it in a trash can, and dumping a coke on it.

  39. Attention whores by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That pretty much sums up Rockstar. The games are just controversial, nothing really original.