Slashdot Mirror


Xbox As An Indie Movie Studio

jhsiao writes "The NYT has an article about machinima and movies set entirely within video games. In the article they interview a number of machinima artists including the folks at Rooster Teeth Productions who brought us Red vs. Blue." From the article: "He created a comedy series called ''Red vs. Blue,'' a sort of sci-fi version of ''M*A*S*H.'' In ''Red vs. Blue,'' the soldiers rarely do any fighting; they just stand around insulting one another and musing over the absurdities of war, sounding less like patriotic warriors than like bored, clever video-store clerks."

114 comments

  1. More of Microsoft's marketing spin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Feed Xbox articles to lazy reporters/writers to increase their PR.

    1. Re:More of Microsoft's marketing spin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'll hear more of these types of articles as the Xbox 360 launch draws closer.

      Likewise for Windows Vista.

      Then sooner or later the blogosphere will light up with Microsoft news and products.

    2. Re:More of Microsoft's marketing spin by ZephyrXero · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This really has nothing to do with MS...lol. It could have just as easily said Gamecube or PS2, but the truth is that most of these machinma shows are made with Halo on an Xbox.

      --
      "A truly wise man realizes he knows nothing."
    3. Re:More of Microsoft's marketing spin by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ok Paul Graham. I guess if the reporters used LISP they could generate their own stories.

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
  2. Obligatory pointer to the Monty Python Skit by Quirk · · Score: 1

    It may well be the Monty Python skit of the funniest joke ever told being lobbed into the warring enemy's camp stirred the imagination of Rooster Teeth Productions to bring us "Red vs. Blue".

    --
    "Academicians are more likely to share each other's toothbrush than each other's nomenclature."
    Cohen
    1. Re:Obligatory pointer to the Monty Python Skit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      For reference, here is the aforementioned "funniest joke ever" (which kills anyone who reads or hears it):

      My dog has no nose. How does he smell?

      Terrible.

    2. Re:Obligatory pointer to the Monty Python Skit by HUADPE · · Score: 2, Informative

      That is not the funniest joke ever. That was the German attempt to counter the funniest joke ever. Oh, and it goes as follows:

      Hitler: "My dog has no nose."

      Crowd: "How does he smell?"

      Hitler: "Awful."

      --
      This sig has not been evaluated by the FDA. It is not designed to diagnose, treat, prevent, or cure any disease.
    3. Re:Obligatory pointer to the Monty Python Skit by KeithIrwin · · Score: 1

      It's obvious you've never watched Red vs. Blue.

      Keith

    4. Re:Obligatory pointer to the Monty Python Skit by ottothecow · · Score: 1
      If you want to see some quite interesting (in what they are capable of that is) machinima, check out some of the World of Warcraft movies out there.

      Sure, a lot of the movies you will find are just recordings of pvp battles or new techniques for doing something but there are some true films (though I have yet to see one with full voiceovers like rvb). Check out "Not Just Another Love Story" which has a fairly large cast (lot of extras), cool "sets", in-game special effects and a fairly entertaining story (albeit lots of sex).

      The real limitation of WoW (though I suppose the same is true of Halo but they make it work) is that you cant use a map editor to build your own sets and the appearence of the characters is limited to what is offered by the game though the game is large enough that there are MANY locations and articles of clothing available (but you have to level that character up a fair amount before the shoot can be done)

      --
      Bottles.
  3. Re:nyt by rogabean · · Score: 1

    This is why I gave in and signed up for a free account with the NYT with a "created for one time use" email address and set it to remember me.

    It may be a "soul sucking registration", but at least I can click on the original link and RTFA.

    As a side note... The series this company does called The Strangerhood is also quite good.

    --
    "why don't you just slip into something more comfortable...like a coma!"
  4. i've seen half an episode on techtv/g4tv.. i mean yeah its funny but like its gonna be like chappelle show. its only gonna last 2 seasons. plus if you watch this, you probably watch hampster dance or jesus dancing.

    basically means you must be really stoned.

    --
    lameness filter thwarted.
    1. Re:yea by Mick+Ohrberg · · Score: 1

      That is about completely and utterly wrong. Still going strong after 3 seasons. Funny, but yet not as disturbing as Salad Fingers (total of 6 episodes there). I may have to buy the DVDs. "And I though I told you to stop making up mythological creatures!"

      --

      Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum sonatur.

    2. Re:yea by HUADPE · · Score: 1

      My friends and I (none of whom were/are stoned) recently finished watching season 2 in our dorm. RvB is hilarious and no, we do not watch the dancing jesus.

      --
      This sig has not been evaluated by the FDA. It is not designed to diagnose, treat, prevent, or cure any disease.
    3. Re:yea by eight+and+a+quarter · · Score: 0, Troll

      u are the same guys who watch the andy milonakis show on MTV.. what im trying to say is that you'll watch anything!

      --
      lameness filter thwarted.
    4. Re:yea by bani · · Score: 1

      red vs blue is pretty boring actually.

      you want funny? the live action pure pwnage is a scream.

    5. Re:yea by eight+and+a+quarter · · Score: 1

      a lot of these sites.. they're poorly ran. i saw this one halo2 site that did videos and they're bitching because they got a $3000 bandwidth overage charge. they're pretty much gonna come and go, so basically its not even worth my time checking them out.

      --
      lameness filter thwarted.
    6. Re:yea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its funny you said Chapelle's show, cause that one is dead in the water seeing as how D. Chapelle had a mental breakdown and quit the show!

      Next time try to know wtf you are talking aobut.

  5. Yes, and ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everybody already knows about R vs B, it's a century old. And the whole machinima thing goes back a milennium by now. Props to the guys doing the vids, but that the NYT is finally catching on doesn't make it /. front page material again. Fuck the NYT (and Wired) channeling on /. Give us some real news.

  6. 5+orange=teal by milktoastman · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Pay no attention to the subject, it isn't for the times. I want to engage in pretenious opinion spewing now.

    Relevant to this article, though, I have to say, I don't think this would ever take off as a legitimate source of quality independent films for three reasons:

    1. Serious filmmakers would just invest in software aimed specifically at professional 3D animations.

    2. If successful independent films started coming out of X-boxes or other consoles at any significant rate, there'd be royalty, DMCA, and/or copyright lawsuits from the console makers.

    3. While slow cookers are a convenient way for bachelors to prepare healthy and tasty meals without taking to much time for the prep work, darker beer will always be for us to animate in Hollywood.

    1. Re:5+orange=teal by xtracto · · Score: 1

      Well, I think other animations like StrangerHood are quite nice and more than just 3D models standing and voices like the ones in Red vs Blue... and as the animations and models advance in the games and the API's felxibility allows those films will be easier to do.

      As for the copyrights lawsuits I do not know, can Red vs Blue count as a derivative work of Halo?? I think that is an interesting ground for laws uh? I do not doubt the big companies will try to suck the last dollar from those indies film makers...

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    2. Re:5+orange=teal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3. While slow cookers are a convenient way for bachelors to prepare healthy and tasty meals without taking to much time for the prep work, darker beer will always be for us to animate in Hollywood.

      I must have forgotten to pay my metaphor bill this month because I have absolutely no clue what you're trying to say.

    3. Re:5+orange=teal by milktoastman · · Score: 1

      The slow cooker factor is always a sticking point for most people. All I can do is offer you the advice I so often hear from my Aikido instructor: "Be patient...this stuff isn't easy to get. It might take 20 years."

    4. Re:5+orange=teal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i hate all the pretentious slashdot assholes who write posts like you.

    5. Re:5+orange=teal by milktoastman · · Score: 1

      Come on dude, you either need to read my post more closely, or you need to learn how to sound ironic.

    6. Re:5+orange=teal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While slow cookers are a convenient way for bachelors to prepare healthy and tasty meals without taking to much time for the prep work, darker beer will always be for us to animate in Hollywood.

      Wilco

      Charlie

      Foxtrot

      Seriously, dude... Was that sentence randomly generated by a perl script or something?

    7. Re:5+orange=teal by AllahsAvatar · · Score: 0

      A little before Halo 2 came out Bungie invited the creators of RvB to preview the game for a week. I would say that means they approve of it.

      --
      No sig for you! Come back, one year!
    8. Re:5+orange=teal by C0rinthian · · Score: 1

      It probably counts as parody or satire.

    9. Re:5+orange=teal by dr.badass · · Score: 1

      As for the copyrights lawsuits I do not know, can Red vs Blue count as a derivative work of Halo?? I think that is an interesting ground for laws uh?

      Red vs. Blue uses maps, textures, models, etc. directly from Halo. It definitely counts as a derivative work. If, as some machinima, it used all-original textures and models, it would not be.

        I do not doubt the big companies will try to suck the last dollar from those indies film makers...

      In is case, Microsoft/Bungie has been openly supportive. In fact, if I remember correctly Red vs. Blue is featured on some of the newer Xbox in-store demo disks.

      Likewise, EA/Maxis has been supportive of The Strangerhood. I even saw a clip from it on IFC one night, though I'm not sure what the context was.

      --
      Don't become a regular here -- you will become retarded.
    10. Re:5+orange=teal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They were on the Halo 2 behind the scenes bonus extra collector's limited edition disk (with commentary).

  7. Ha! Could make Doom the way it should be made by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Instead of the hollywood mess and foot dragging that has been going on.

    Watch out Pixel! XBox, PS3, and Mac Mini's are coming to an apartment near you!

  8. Plz see 20721 to .... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LOL @ #buttes failures.

  9. Re:VISUAL STUDIO 2005 ROCKS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesn't that apply to your comment too, thus making you a hypocrite?

  10. Re:VISUAL STUDIO 2005 ROCKS by eight+and+a+quarter · · Score: 1

    i would of expected something funnier. they just don't troll like they used to.

    --
    lameness filter thwarted.
  11. Re:VISUAL STUDIO 2005 ROCKS by milktoastman · · Score: 1

    come on, admit it, you posted the parent comment anonymously, and then replied to it, right? Maybe? I guess I can't prove it...but I've done worse things. A guilty conscience can't trust in anyone else, I guess.

  12. Uh NO by Umbral+Blot · · Score: 4, Informative

    Lets see red vs. blue just finished season 3, with a insanely large number of fans waiting for season 4. So basically you are totally and completely wrong. I mean at least visit the website once.

    1. Re:Uh NO by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      It certainly wasn't the only Slashdotter that made unfounded claims without knowing what they are talking about, and certainly won't be the last. Reading the actual article is technically a lost skill, the same goes with doing research before yapping stupid and wrong claims.

    2. Re:Uh NO by carninja · · Score: 1

      The fool thinks G4 is a reliable source of information. That alone should tell you to simply ignore his stupidity.

    3. Re:Uh NO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Too bad it's not funny.

  13. Re:Ha! Could make Doom the way it should be made by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I bet pixel is just shaking in it's phosphor boots.

  14. What am I missing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    What am I missing?? Doesn't one purchase a computer game to PLAY the game, NOT to sit around, "rarely fighting", with voiceovers for some god-aweful comedy?

    I don't know about you guys, but RvB has to be the stupidest thing around. I for one, enjoy Halo, like, as in actually playing it.

    1. Re:What am I missing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know this will be modded troll but here it goes: It's for bored brainless office Americans with weak humor laughing at every stupid bit. Watch an episode, perhaps you like it.

    2. Re:What am I missing? by BakaHoushi · · Score: 1

      The key thing you're missing here is that these games don't require you to own the system they play on (unless it's a PC game, obviously).

      I personally love playing games (and I mean actually playing them, not watching them) but I find Red vs. Blue to be brilliant in a very smart-ass way. It's another example of using a medium to spoof the medium. A lot of the humor of RvB revolves around making fun of FPS conventions (like that island or whatever from season 2 where everyone talks like those annoying 12 year old online gamers).

      Another positive note, you don't have to own the game. For me, this can be VERY good because I cannot STAND Halo, but still love RvB.

      Judge a video or series based on its quality, not how it is made (unless you're judging animation QUALITY of course).

    3. Re:What am I missing? by VoidWraith · · Score: 1

      The counterstrike episode is like that too. I haven't seen many, but that one (I think its 37?) is very funny.

    4. Re:What am I missing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What am I missing?? Doesn't one download a movie to watch it, NOT to run about rather aimlessly, "constantly fighting", with voiceovers for some god-aweful attempt at a plot line?

      I don't know about you guys, but Halo (and Halo 2) has to be the stupidest thing around. I for one, enjoy RvsB, like, as in actually watching videos made from Halo.

    5. Re:What am I missing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I for one, wish people, would learn, to use, commas more, appropriately.

    6. Re:What am I missing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      lol


      .

    7. Re:What am I missing? by arkhan_jg · · Score: 1

      I think you're missing the point of RvB.

      These guys use the Halo engine to cut together their own comedy show, a technique called machinima. It's similar in principle to using modelling clay and a video camera to produce animation comedy. You download and watch videos of this from their website. You can also buy DVDs of past series. It's not like you're actually playing Halo with them!

      If you like their style of humour, you'll find it pretty damn funny.

      Try it out, see what you think.

      --
      Remember kids, it's all fun and games until someone commits wholesale galactic genocide.
    8. Re:What am I missing? by Toddarooski · · Score: 1

      Apparently, you're missing a sense of humor.

      --

      "Do you expect me to talk?" "No, Mr. Bond. I expect you to die!"

  15. Something actually new by panurge · · Score: 4, Insightful
    This is actually pretty interesting, but likely to be stamped out by the IP owners.
    It actually shows pretty clearly what is wrong with present attempts at continued IP extension; it suppresses innovation and originality at the expense of a fossilised business model.

    Kids have always played with dolls and toy soldiers and engaged in imaginative play. This is actually a way of actualising that play in a reproducible manner. It's getting back to a core process of the human imagination, and suddenly making it more than just a transient entertainment for a few children.

    Up till now animation has been a relatively expensive process which puts it under the control of studios, or results in tiny cartoons produced with great labor by students. This shows that the process is now ready to be democratised - if it is allowed to happen. Potentially Open Source could do this, by creating Open Source animation engines which work with Open Source avatars - meaning that kids (and people a lot older) could create and release those avatars. The result? Well, if it's like music, where the means did NOT result in talented outsiders getting much exposure via the P2P networks, but does result in a lot of piracy, it will be disappointing. But it would be nice if, for once, educators and others got a clue and encouraged kids to use their creative talent on computer generated animation.

    On a slightly relatied topic, I do not believe that the real driving force behind the attack on P2P networks is fear of piracy. Piracy just legitimises the existing pyramid structure of content creation and distribution. They are under attack because of the fear that one day they might result in democratisation of content creation and distribution - which would destroy the recording industry and the movie industry as their "blockbuster" lowest common denominator model had to compete within a huge number of niche markets. That's where freedom (the right to create and distribute without being suppressed by the monopolist) meets Marxist socialism - the idea that citizens rather than capitalists should own the means of production and distribution.

    --
    Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
    1. Re:Something actually new by anitha+cn- · · Score: 1

      It seems that many companies are allowing people to use their games to make videos, because it benefits them. They see the videos as free advertizing for them. At least, the ones mentioned in the article do.

    2. Re:Something actually new by Have+Blue · · Score: 3, Informative

      Don't paint RvB as subversives hunted by The Man- they have a licensing agreement and are cooperating fully with Microsoft.

      Animation is *still* an expensive, complex, and labor-intensive process. RvB is easy to produce because it's using animations that took the original studio months to create. All they provided were the scripts, voices, and players to use the extremely simplified character controls in the game- all of these can easily be done in spare time and with zero budget and day jobs. Modeling, texturing, rigging, and animating from scratch are far more complicated processes, and they're not going to be simplified anytime soon because specifying the exact appearance and motions of every single movable part of the human body several times a second for the period of several minutes is an inherently labor-intensive task.

  16. talking heads by randallschleufer · · Score: 1, Funny

    Red vs Blue isn't that great. Sure, it can be funny in a stupid sort of way. But there are far better methods of entertainment out there. Hell, I'd rather read an online comic strip. Or watch something that acually makes use of ANIMATION (like Homestar) rather than just a bunch of talking heads.

    Red vs Blue reminds me of the Garfield comic strip. Gee, what's Garfield up to today? Sitting on the table and talking to John? And he hates Mondays? And he steals Johns Lasagna then smacks Odie in the teeth? HAAHHAAHAH friggin Hilarious, that Garfield is such a cad.

    Please note that I covered about 99% of all Garfield comics in ONE PARAGRAPH.

    1. Re:talking heads by kosmicki · · Score: 1

      I think the humor in RvB comes from WHAT they say, not the medium it is on. If it was written as a story, or a webcomic, it might be just as funny.

      Where Garfield is same crap, different panel. (Oh, you missed a huge portion of strips, Jon being rejected over the phone.)

    2. Re:talking heads by Ravatar · · Score: 1
    3. Re:talking heads by Frodo+Crockett · · Score: 1

      Red vs Blue isn't that great. Sure, it can be funny in a stupid sort of way. But there are far better methods of entertainment out there. Hell, I'd rather read an online comic strip.

      8-bit Theater
      Ctrl-Alt-Del
      Van Von Hunter
      Cup of Suffering
      Elf Only Inn

      Enjoy.

      --
      "The newly born animals are then whisked off for a quick run through a giant baking oven." --heard on Food Network
    4. Re:talking heads by crazymandias · · Score: 1

      You have a valid point about Garfield, but much of the reasons for the popularity of Garfield are precisely the reasons you have given - the well engineered mediocrity and conformity hard coded into the Garfield universe. Read this slate piece about it: http://slate.msn.com/id/2102299/


      --------
      My Pop Culture Theme Quizzes, have fun reading and solving them.
      The First
      The Second
      The Third
      Solutions to #1

      --
      Pop Culture Theme Quizzes posted onto my blog. Have fun.
    5. Re:talking heads by Frodo+Crockett · · Score: 1

      You have a valid point about Windows, but much of the reasons for the popularity of Windows are precisely the reasons you have given - the well engineered mediocrity and conformity hard coded into the Windows univers

      Fixed it for you.

      --
      "The newly born animals are then whisked off for a quick run through a giant baking oven." --heard on Food Network
    6. Re:talking heads by vertinox · · Score: 1

      Hell, I'd rather watch an online animated series. Doh!

      But seriously, I like online comics, but I find animation of any kind interesting even if it's David Firth on Newgrounds. Talking heads or not... It's still made me laugh and thats what counts.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    7. Re:talking heads by randallschleufer · · Score: 1

      When my friends and I play Halo2, we literally laugh our asses off at some of our antics. I just think that the medium has so much more to offer rather than just a bunch of speculation and chatter. Some of the commentary is funny, but it is equally funny in comic-strip format, or even simple audio. The video simply contributes NOTHING. Plus it is a waste of bandwidth/storage. I wanna see them pull some Dukes of Hazzard stunts with that Warthog. YeeeeeeeeeeeeHAAAAaaaaa!

  17. No, Thanks... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Bored, Lazy Video Game Store Clerks: The Game

    Buy your copy of the game at the store today to get it autographed by a bored, lazy video game store clerk! Hurry while supplies last.

    1. Re:No, Thanks... by patricksevenlee · · Score: 1
      Buy your copy of the game at the store today to get it autographed by a bored, lazy video game store clerk! Hurry while supplies last.

      Kevin Smith should be able to sue for prior art.

      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/B000 00IQC8/qid=1123451168/sr=1-2/ref=sr_1_2/102-343896 7-9445729?v=glance&s=dvd

  18. Stunt Island by Tarquin+Sidebottom · · Score: 1

    It's about time somebody started an open source equivalent of Stunt Island, but expanded to the whole range of movie requirements....

  19. But, ILoveBees! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


       

  20. Re:nyt by Donjo · · Score: 1

    Or if you really wanna stick it to the man... www.bugmenot.com !

  21. Re:nyt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I gave up sticking it to the man after college.

    You find the man more often then not.. sticks it to you.

  22. Re:VISUAL STUDIO 2005 ROCKS by FLAGGR · · Score: 1

    It was a troll, you must be new here.

  23. Bypass NYT registration by panxerox · · Score: 1


    1. Copy story location.
    2. Paste into google search
    3. click on link that appears on the google search page.
    4. ???
    5. Profit

    --
    "It's so convenient to have a system where everyone is a criminal" - A. Hitler
  24. Not warriors? by froschmann · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    How dare you insult the memory of Church (God rest his soul).

  25. Re:nyt by ultranova · · Score: 1

    This is why I gave in and signed up for a free account with the NYT with a "created for one time use" email address and set it to remember me.

    It may be a "soul sucking registration", but at least I can click on the original link and RTFA.

    Ironically, the link in the summary apparently contains the neccessary HTTP GET cruft to make NYT think that it's coming from a partner, bypassing the need to register. You could have simply clicked on the link to read the story.

    You let your soul be sucked off for nothing. Another Slashbot has succumbed to the NYT side of the Net. But fortunately, the NYT website seems to have forgotten to add a shield before the exhaust port that leads directly to the main article database, and our brave Slashdot editors have gotten their hands on the secret plans; but already the forces of the FBI and their villainous leader, Dark Suit, are in hot pursuit. Will the secret base of the Slashdot editors be found ? Will CmdrTaco be captured ? Will the DMCA be invoked ? Find out in the next exciting episode of... Slashdotted !

    --

    Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

  26. Just A Game by MuNansen · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Keep an eye out. Hopefully in about a month I'll be releasing something that should change a few minds. (btw, I created "Ours Again," and am one of the producers referred to working on "Game On" in the article).

  27. Re:nyt by Solosoft · · Score: 1

    Have you tried Bug Me Not. It's a firefox extension.

    Just right click on the "Signup" thing and click "bugmenot" and it goes on the internet and finds you a login. It also works for alot of other sites out there.

    Check it out ... the best part is it's free.

  28. Why Xbox? by ilyaaohell · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Referring to the Xbox as THE game console is like referring to the Mac as THE personal computer.

    What's up with Slashdot, and these other publications like the New York Times, talk about Xbox like it's what the kids are playing these days? It's selling like 1/5th the rate of the PS2. I don't have either of these consoles, but I'd still like to know why the less successful product in an industry composed of only a handful of competitors get this publicity.

    --
    UNIX: A computer user is defined as a programmer. WINDOWS: A computer user is defined as a consumer.
    1. Re:Why Xbox? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the article is primarily about Red vs Blue, which was made using Halo on Xbox. A simple explanation, no conspiracy theories needed.

  29. Quake machinima seems forgotten by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    While I'm not 100% certain, I believe machinima began with Quake, yet it's strangely absent from machinima discussions. Arguably the greatest (but certainly the largest and most ambitious) machinima movie for Quake is Seal of Nehahra. It's a background movie to the Nehahra modification (which has extensive cutscenes as well). I think the length is close to three hours. The story was written by a published writer, and it's an expanded version of Quake's originally vague backstory interconnected with Nehahra's own storyline. Custom engine, custom maps, custom music, custom models, multiple voice actors... even before Nehahra and Seal of Nehahra were released, Quake was already forgotten by the rest of the gaming world, so I guess that's why it's never mentioned.

    Another movie worth mentioning is Eschaton: Darkening Twilight, which was one of the few attempts at serious machinima (along with Nehahra). I think it had some Cthulhu themes in it. A sequel was made for Quake II (Nightfall), but as far as I know it was discontinued after that.

    Quake had a lot of great machinima, far more ambitious than what I've seen these days. I've seen a bit of Red Vs. Blue and it didn't really impress me. Maybe I just watched some lackluster episodes. Over the Counter-Strike had a few funny episodes, but it was really just voice acting in official CS maps. I admit that I don't actively follow machinima, so I don't really know what kind of stuff is being made these days, but the more famous (or "mainstream") machinima like RvsB isn't as good as the older Quake stuff.

    The new Half-Life 2 short movie, "A Few Good G-men," is a nice example of what Source can do with its facial expressions and lip synching and such, but I wonder if anyone will take it further by making a longer, original movie.

    As for that article, I find it very strange. It makes machinima seem like it was invented by Red Vs. Blue, and that there's something profoundly mysterious and amazing about it. I mean, does RvsB take as much work as making maps, models, music and textures from scratch along with engine modifications? I doubt it. Some of the earliest machinima pieces for Quake were much like RvsB, but they became more complex, and now it seems like we're back at square one.

    1. Re:Quake machinima seems forgotten by The+Evil+Couch · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The new Half-Life 2 short movie, "A Few Good G-men," is a nice example of what Source can do with its facial expressions and lip synching and such, but I wonder if anyone will take it further by making a longer, original movie.

      I'm in late script-writing phase for an original full-length machinima for UT2004, I'm calling "Skaarj Wars". I'm looking to release it sometime around this time next year. Depending on how soon I can get the attention and efforts of good modelers and mappers, it may get released sooner.

      You can poke at Johari Sports Network to keep tabs on my project, if you like, but like I said, it's not going to be done for awhile, so don't expect too much in the near future.

    2. Re:Quake machinima seems forgotten by ILL+Clinton · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Yes, Machinima started with Quake. I know because I directed one of the first Machinima movies, Apartment Huntin'. We used Quake for that. You can see that movie if you scroll to the bottom of this page.

      In fact we still sometimes use a modified version of Quake 2 called Qfusion which allows us to use Quake 3 assets within the open source Quake 2 game engine. A nice example of this can be seen in a series of shorts we did for SpikeTV called Gamer Gags.

  30. Re:nyt by Flunitrazepam · · Score: 1

    Nyet!

    --
    1) Your analysis is based on bad assumptions so your result is way off. 2) You're a sick bastard for fucking a horse.
  31. hey, you're really late. by jonfields · · Score: 1

    You're late by 3 seasons.

  32. Bored Video Store Clerks by technoCon · · Score: 1

    Has anyone else noticed a disconnect between the people who tote rifles into harm's way and the people who write stories about toting rifles into harm's way? Back before Rumsfeld ended the draft (hehe, during the Nixon administration), there was a chance that an future playwrite or author would get drafted and come back writing something like Catch-22 or Platoon or somesuch. And the guys working on the movie with him would have a gut feel for what things are like based on their memories of Korea or Germany, etc.

    Nowadays, the guy writing the screenplay for the TV show or movie that features military people doing military things will have no military experience. I cite as an example the stories about a heavy cruiser whose designation was NC-1701. When scripts for this warship were written in the '60s they reflected a passing familiarity with military protocol and decorum. The scripts for the recently cancelled series at the end of this franchise seemed not to.

    1. Re:Bored Video Store Clerks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, according to the article, at least one of the RvB artists does have military experience. And the series is apparently quite popular with members of the armed forces.

  33. I'm sorry, you can't show that in the movie .. by RedLaggedTeut · · Score: 1

    I'm sorry, you can't show the kid playing with the barbie doll in the movie since you are stealing the design and looks of barbie, hence our intellectual property.

    Ah yes, and the color the room is painted in is trademarked by our subsidary.

    --
    I'm still trying to figure out what people mean by 'social skills' here.
  34. Re:VISUAL STUDIO 2005 ROCKS by milktoastman · · Score: 1
    Visit me at the tracks....you'll lose it to the rails...but it will be a big thrill before the train slices it off. You'll thank me, then have your meal. Drop it off in the sewer for some flavor. Now that...IS...ART!!!

    In other words, don't touch my troll babies!!

  35. Clerks. by Sr.+Pato · · Score: 1
    sounding less like patriotic warriors than like bored, clever video-store clerks.
    Get it. It's a good movie. :-) And, come to think about it. The humour in both RvB and Clerks is darn similar. Hm, something to ponder about.

    --
    Nobody's gay for Mole-Man. :-(
  36. Motion capture? by tepples · · Score: 1

    specifying the exact appearance and motions of every single movable part of the human body several times a second for the period of several minutes is an inherently labor-intensive task.

    Inherently? Why would it take any more than "several minutes" once the character is modeled, textured, and articulated? Can't an actor put on a highly contrasty suit and act on stage in real time, where video cameras and/or other sensors feed the performance into the computer and turn it into a motion sequence?

    1. Re:Motion capture? by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Can't an actor put on a highly contrasty suit and act on stage in real time, where video cameras and/or other sensors feed the performance into the computer and turn it into a motion sequence?"

      There is software being worked on to do just that. But it's expensive (for now) and it's still not ideal. For one thing, parts of the actor are obscured during a take. The software attempts to work out what was going on from the previous and following frames, but it still requires cleanup. Sometimes it's faster just to rebuild the animation manually.

      "Inherently? Why would it take any more than "several minutes" once the character is modeled, textured, and articulated? "

      This is a little tough to explain without showing you on screen what actually goes into the animation process. The first thing to remember is that the human body has a LOT of articulated points. Not just in the extremities, but in the face, too. There are a lot of things to move around. Then there's the task of getting them to move the right way. If you pull the character's waist around, do you want the feet to stay affixed to the ground or are you moving him to a new position? Then there's the matter of getting the motion of the character just right. This is the most intensive part. A lot of time is spent going over the animation again and again and again testing it. There is no 'got it in one take!' with character animation. Everything you do creates ripples elsewhere in the animation, and it all has to be tidied up.

      I don't know if I'm explaining this very clearly or not, apologies if I missed the mark. But, I can tell you as an animator, it is inherently labor intensive work. Humans are very complex creatures. Capturing their likeness in an animation requires a LOT of attention to detail. Compound that with the fact that there are heirarchical and physics problems to boot. No easy chore. Pixar animators, for example, crank out a whopping 6 seconds of footage a week. That's not much, but by the time they've gone there, they've roughed it out, tweaked it, gotten it approved, and from there they've worked on the final animation. In that case, though, they're not just creating animation, they're inventing it like an actor would.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  37. Re:nyt by Irashtar · · Score: 1

    And occationally, into you.

  38. Sounds a bit like Blender/Orange by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Red vs Blue sounds a bit like the orange movie project sponsored over at blender (blender3d.org). Blender4 is going to be a major upgrade, with some nice CFD effects, upgraded particle, animation, and model systems, and a much easier way to integrate into (export/import) other packages. The pipeline had to get easier. Much of the development comes from the Google "summer of code" with at least 5 PhD students being sponsered to enhance blender. The Orange movie project is also driving some of the development (and it's all good).

  39. More about this by distortion311 · · Score: 0

    You can find more info on this topic at www.distortionfile.com/forum.

  40. Small Price to Pay by Hedonist23 · · Score: 1

    For not having the draft!

  41. Re:Just A Game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    *Yawn*

  42. What you're missing is a personality. by cbreaker · · Score: 1

    You can do whatever you want. You can choose to download a RvB episode, you can make one yourself, or you can play Halo. Or not.

    I think it's kinda funny, you don't, but it really has nothing to do with the game Halo itself.

    People purchase computers to do whatever they want with them - not just your rigid idea of what you SHOULD do with them.

    --
    - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    1. Re:What you're missing is a personality. by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1
      I think it's kinda funny, you don't, but it really has nothing to do with the game Halo itself.

      Sure it does:

      Simmons: Seriously though, why are we out here? Far as I can tell it's just a box canyon in the middle of nowhere. No way in or out.

      Grif: Mm-hmm.

      Simmons: The only reason we set up a red base here is because they have a blue base over there. And the only reason they have a blue base over there is because we have a red base here.

      Grif: Yeah, that's 'cause we're fighting each other.

      Simmons: No, no, but I mean even if we were to pull out today and they were to come take our base they would have two bases in the middle of a box canyon. Whoop-de-fucking-do.

      Grif: What's up with that anyway? I mean, I signed up to fight aliens. Next thing I know Master Chief blows up the whole Covenant armada and I'm stuck in the middle of nowhere, fighting a bunch of blue guys.... Talk about a waste of resources! I mean, we should be out there finding new and intelligent forms of life. You know, fight them!

      Simmons: Yeah, no shit. That's why they should put us in charge.
      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  43. Got firefox? Use this extension. by TheLittleJetson · · Score: 1
  44. Where's all the hl2 porn? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well?!?

  45. 2005 has been a good year for Machinima by ILL+Clinton · · Score: 3, Informative
    There's actually quite a bit going on this year in the Machinima movement...

    The Academy of Machinima Arts and Sciences has announced the 2005, not so annual, Machinima Film Festival. The festival will once again be held at the American Museum of the Moving Image in Astoria, New York.

    Machinima in general has grown in popularity and commercial success since the last festival in 2003 with such recent work as Paul Marino's Half Life 2 music video, "I'm Still Seeing Breen" appearing on MTV2's Video Mods, Rooster Teeth's recent series of shorts for IFC, the Nisha Chronicles for GMD Studios' latest A.R.G. promoting the Audi A3, and The ILL Clan's "Gamer Gags" for SpikeTV.

    In all it's been a good year for Machinima, and it's only August.

  46. Lots of current examples by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you want to see this in action, take a look at the movie section of HighImpactHalo or TrickGamer.
    They both have lots of videos, some of which are pretty good.

  47. Re:nyt by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, how you'd love folks to be recommending that tool to your visitors if you were a website owner.

    I registered with the NYT in 2002 so I could click-through on Slashdot links. No spam, no questionnaires, nothing...so what's the problem?

    Oh, yeah...you're too lazy to fill out a registration form. How come you aren't too lazy to put together "witty" and "biting" comebacks on every topic at /. then? Slashdot users need to be less fat about everything. "This is too much trouble, that's annoying, who stole my cake, I only span round in my chair for two seconds!"

    Where's my dialling wand....?

  48. Someone had to say it... by John+Pfeiffer · · Score: 2, Funny

    I, for one, welcome the New York Times to two years ago.

    --

    Friend: "The NIC is misconfigured..." Me: "No prob, I'll just telnet in and fix it." *Silence*
  49. A sense of humor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Red Vs Blue is a joke. Laugh, dummy.

  50. Seriously? A machinima movie snob? Already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    "I weep for the future."
          -Chez Louis Matre'd, Ferris Buehler's Day Off

    This art form is about two and a half seconds old, and already we have people navel gazing about how much better machinima was way back in 99.

    Back when they used to make machinima with a butter churn and bad poetry.

    Jeez!

  51. Oh No... by kaellinn18 · · Score: 1

    I hope I have time to get the location of the Grail written out before I die.

    Here may be found the last words of Joseph of Arimathea. He who is valiant and pure of spirit may find the Holy Grail in the Castle of aaarrrrggh....

    --

    --------
    This isn't the sig you're looking for. Move along.
  52. Get a clue by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 1

    2. If successful independent films started coming out of X-boxes or other consoles at any significant rate, there'd be royalty, DMCA, and/or copyright lawsuits from the console makers.

    What makes you think Microsoft owns the copyright to every game played on the XBOX? Those rights lie with the game manufacturer. And where's the defeating of a protective measure that would bring the DMCA into play? This is done by capturing non-Macrovisioned analog outputs. Or is any recording device now considered a circumvention device?

    I want to engage in pretenious opinion spewing now.

    And someone modded it as Insightful?

    --
    Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  53. Re:nyt by Solosoft · · Score: 1

    Well ... because it's not just for the NYT. Im lazy .. I want my content NOW not after signing up for 3000 things and such.

    Why must you come to conclusions mr angry Anonymous Coward ?

  54. Just have to say... by Krater76 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... that you'd be smart if you didn't waste your time doing machinima. I'm not going to get into the argument of whether or not something is funny or interesting, what I am going to talk about is ownership.

    I can't remember when I read it but Gabe at Penny Arcade explained why you should not use sprite animations in a comic strip. He wasn't talking about drawing your own sprites, he was referring to making a comic from Mega Man sprites or some other game. The fact is you don't own the sprites and while it's possibly fair use to use them to not make any money, what do you do if you actually do make a good comic? Say you get 5000-10000 readers per day or more? What are you going to sell? Penny Arcade and PvP, as examples, sell a lot of different merchandise, from key chains to t-shirts to laser etched prints.

    Red vs. Blue sells t-shirts that are mostly softball team shirts (small icon on the front-left, name of character and a number of the back) and probably do ok. But they can never have a shirt with the characters on it because they don't own the characters.

    I don't know the licensing scheme with 'The Strangerhood' characters but that show is just lame anyways. If you bought a shirt from that series you are unquestionably without taste.

    --
    "Is life so dear, or peace so sweet, as to be purchased at the price of chains and slavery?" - Patrick Henry
  55. Yeah, its okay funny but... by thundar2000 · · Score: 1


    Doesn't the new york times have something better to write about in their sunday mag?

    What a god-awful boring story...

    I would of probably enjoyed an expose on the lightsaber dude better.

  56. M*A*S*H by Cookie3 · · Score: 1

    "He created a comedy series called ''Red vs. Blue,'' a sort of sci-fi version of ''M*A*S*H.'' In ''Red vs. Blue,'' the soldiers rarely do any fighting; they just stand around insulting one another and musing over the absurdities of war, sounding less like patriotic warriors than like bored, clever video-store clerks."

    M*A*S*H was a war comedy about a medical unit during the Korean War -- wounded soldiers were flown/driven to their location, operated on, and sent back into the war. They were rarely under fire, and rarely carried weapons, although I recall several different "tense" episodes where Bad Things(TM) were going on, and the unit had to evacuate/move to the front lines/etc.

    The very core of the show was about the doctors, and quite a few scenes were shot with the docs quibbling to one another over a patient's body. Some episodes, naturally, dealt less with medical situations than others, but even in its more comedic seasons, you would find a large number of episodes involving either patients or the practice of being a doctor.

    It's disingenuous to compare Red and Blue to M*A*S*H because "the soldiers rarely do any fighting". M*A*S*H's doctors did do their job. It's just that their job wasn't fighting.

    --
    present day... present time... hahahaha...
  57. read the article... by Landshark17 · · Score: 0

    I read the article and according to the author, the first episode of Red Vs. Blue was ten minutes. Wrong, it was two minutes. I don't think a single episode in season one was more than seven minutes. Also they have a story board one episode in which they quote RvB incorrectly, probably because of profanity.

    --
    This sig is false.