Slashdot Mirror


Slashback: Start, Trash, Explain

Slashback tonight with more on the Microsoft start page project vis-a-vis Google's similar one, a wee $40 million slap on the wrist for Amazon over shopping-cart patent infrigement, new animals for the CodeZoo, and a strong denial that WikiPedia has announced a more stringent editorial policy. Details on these stories and more, below.

What's done is done, and in a certain order. MSN.com general manager Hadi Partovi writes:
"A few days ago I read your Slashdot post about start.com.

Thank you for the promotion :-). Meanwhile, I wanted to make sure you know that the work we've been doing on the start.com project actually predates the Google personalized page. I manage a tiny incubation team that has been building start.com since November, and it was first live on the Web in February, 3 months before Google released their personalized page. Of course we are missing some capabilities that Google has, and vice versa. It's a tight competition. But I'm emailing you because our team takes a lot of pride in its innovation. You may point out at a lot of place where Microsoft is following competitors, but if you track the functionality and UI changes that the companies have made over the past 6 months, this has clearly been a place where Google has been following Microsoft's lead.

(Our main engineer on the project has written a bit more about this to respond to your post.)

Anyway, I'm not sending this to be defensive. Heck, I have a lot of work to do to bring an innovation culture to the MSN organization and in many areas we have our work cut out for us. But I guess I want my small incubation team to get credit for being the leading innovators on this one small product :-)"


Thanks for the note!

Always clean out the trashcan. dotpavan writes "The Register and Cnet have this report about Kai-Fu Lee not cleaning his recycle bin at his previous workplace and now MS has stumbled upon some interesting document, which shows that Google anticipated the MS move, and had planned top put him on a leave of absence or have him as a consultant to thwart any attempt of MS getting him back."

Amazon Settles Patent Suit For $40M theodp writes "In today's SEC filing, Amazon.com disclosed it will pay $40 million to settle an e-commerce patent infringement lawsuit that was reported earlier on Slashdot. The terms of the settlement also provide for dismissal of all claims and counterclaims and grant Amazon a nonexclusive license to Soverain's patent portfolio."

29+36 more = 65 vector drawing apps. Anonymous Coward writes "There were many useful comments made for 29 Vector Drawing Programs. After incorporating most of them, the revised column has 65 Vector Drawing Programs."

And each after its own kind. chromatic writes "As seen on the O'Reilly Radar and announced at OSCON 2005, CodeZoo now lists Python and Ruby components. CodeZoo is a human-edited directory of useful, well-maintained, and redistributable software components in various languages. (Slashdot previously covered CodeZoo's launch.)"

The chair recognizes Mr. Wales for a point of clarification. brajesh writes "There has been news on Slashdot and others about Wikipedia announcing tighter editorial control. It seems that everyone jumped the gun. Jimmy Wales, a founder of Wikipedia, has clarified his stance on the idea of freezing stable content on Wikipedia. Apparently, [Jimbo writes] 'I spoke in English, and this was translated to German. Then the German was translated back to English, and then translated again into the Slashdot story.' Also, 'There was no "announcement." We are constantly reviewing our policies and looking for ways to improve, but we have not "announced" anything. We don't even really work that way ... if you know how Wikipedia works, it's through a long process of community discussion and consensus building, not through a process of top-down announcements.' This has also been covered on Ars Technica."

Google Earth not a security risk after all. mister_tim writes "In a follow-up to yesterday's story about ANSTO's request that Google censor images of Australia's only nuclear reactor, the Australian government has now come out and said that Google Earth poses no security risk. Australia's Attorney General has come to the view, also noted by many /. readers, that the Google images have been available for several years from other sources and add nothing to the existing publicly available data. Chalk this one up as a victory for common sense."

39 of 142 comments (clear)

  1. Re:CodeZoo by Poromenos1 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Indeed. I was just browsing and this seems especially useful: http://www.scipy.org/. It's a mathematical library addon for python (turning it into a sort of matlab).

    --
    Send email from the afterlife! Write your e-will at Dead Man's Switch.
  2. Competition == Good by deutschemonte · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's cool to know that MSN actually came up with that interface before Google. I mean, I hate MS and love Google just as much as the next /.'er, but tight competition like this is awesome for everyone involved.

    Now if only we could get some nice eye candy from the Yahoo! folks.

    --
    The preceding message was based on actual events. Only the names, locations and events have been changed.
    1. Re:Competition == Good by generic-man · · Score: 5, Informative

      http://next.yahoo.com/

      Yahoo!'s testing ground for its new stuff.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    2. Re:Competition == Good by Breakfast+Pants · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That isn't exactly true. The main innovation of the interface is the dragging. Google implemented the dragging of the items earlier than start.com. The guy from start, who sent in this slashback entry, even admitted it himself, saying "We did notice when google shipped their page in May and I have to admit we were like "darn, they have drag/drop before we do": http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=157898&cid=132 29038

      --

      --

      WHO ATE MY BREAKFAST PANTS?
  3. proper destruction of documents by aaza · · Score: 4, Insightful
    This is why shredders are so useful...

    Apart from the fact that the one at my work has a "donations for hearing aid fund" on it (put on there by the guy who sits right next to it).

    They're great: they turn whole pieces of paper into lots of tiny things this big -->.<--

    --
    In theory there is no difference between theory and practice.
    In practice, however, there is.
    1. Re:proper destruction of documents by generic-man · · Score: 4, Funny

      This is why OS/2 was so powerful: instead of some pansy "trash bin" or "recycle bin," it had a Shredder. Some of the later versions made an awful noise when you shredded a file.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    2. Re:proper destruction of documents by ZosX · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah, but it did not really shred the document. I hear the gold standard these days is something like 30+ write overs. That is an awful lot of writing to delete a file. Just imagine how long a 1 gig file would take to delete! On a 486/33! Clearly they didn't do anything beyond just marking the filespace as writable.

    3. Re:proper destruction of documents by generic-man · · Score: 3, Interesting

      True. There have historically been add-ons to most OSes to wipe the sectors out to provide that extra security. Mac OS X has an option "Secure Empty Trash" on the Finder's application menu, and as such it's the first OS I've seen to include such an accessible feature. It takes a very long time compared with regular Empty Trash even on a 1.33 GHz machine.

      --
      For more information, click here.
  4. MSN did some innovation! by jb.hl.com · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sweet, Start.com isn't actually that bad, and they trumped Google too! Now all they need is to have an email service which doesn't piss off everyone who uses it, a homepage which isn't cluttered and full of shite and doesn't install cookies on your PC when all you want to do is download Firefox on a new Windows install, a Messenger service which doesn't have wanky "nudge" features built in which are expressly designed to cater for those with the intelligence spans of a flea, a media player that works with ShoutCast streams and doesn't clash horribly with every other app out there in terms of UI, a web browser that isn't 5 years behind Firefox in terms of EVERYTHING and a fucking always on top button on Windows, and they're getting somewhere!

    --
    By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
  5. Encyclopedias are meant to be edited by anything+lemon · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If Wikipedia wants more credibility, then they need to start freezing some articles. At least the most controversial ones, which as you know are terrorized by vandals and agenda-pushers.

    1. Re:Encyclopedias are meant to be edited by bcrowell · · Score: 3, Interesting
      If Wikipedia wants more credibility, then they need to start freezing some articles. At least the most controversial ones, which as you know are terrorized by vandals and agenda-pushers.
      Wikipedia doesn't always do well on controversial topics, but I don't think freezing articles would necessarily help. In fact, WP already has a procedure to freeze articles, and it's generally used when an article is experiencing a revert war, or a wave of determined vandalism. In the case of a revert war, my experience is that the freeze is an admission of failure, and the frozen version of the article typically sucks to high heaven. An article that gets to that point is one that's already become a sterile battlefield, and nobody has been able to do any constructive work on it for a long time. Freezing doesn't help; it just gives official recognition to the fact that the article is dysfunctional anyway.

      I think the most positive thing WP can do right now is to eliminate the time-honored custom of allowing anonymous edits, and institute some kind of moderation system (yes, a la Slashdot) so that sock-puppet accounts can't be used to mess up an article over and over. For instance, there was recently a horrible mess over the article on apartheid, where one anonymous editor kept insisting on inserting text about Jews in an effort to blame apartheid on the Jews. It caused massive conniptions, because he was dialing in from different IP addresses several times a day, and using sockpuppet accounts.

      Another example is an artist named Gabrichidze, who has been spamming lots of articles (Mermaid, Plato, Pop art,...) with his (non-copylefted) artwork. Once people got wise to him, he started creating sockpuppet accounts to throw people off the trail.

    2. Re:Encyclopedias are meant to be edited by enosys · · Score: 3, Interesting

      They should have a "released" version that is locked and a "current" version that is undergoing change.

    3. Re:Encyclopedias are meant to be edited by Prof.+Pi · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I think the most positive thing WP can do right now is to eliminate the time-honored custom of allowing anonymous edits, and institute some kind of moderation system (yes, a la Slashdot)

      Which would cause them to degenerate into groupthink (yes, a la Slashdot).

      I've seen way too many cases in which posts that say little more than "X sucks" (where X is any of the usual things hated by the majority here) get +5 Insightful, while well-written posts defending X and presenting cogent arguments get modded down into oblivion. Meta-moderation fails due to the same groupthink. ("Yes, nobody intelligent or moral could really be defending X, so I agree with the moderator that it's Flamebait.")

      Slashdot is viewed as heavily biased in many circles, and for good reason. If WP wants to be taken seriously, they should avoid copying Slashdot.

    4. Re:Encyclopedias are meant to be edited by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Group think can be avoided by having a rating system tied to the actual rating rather than in +-1 steps.

      Instead of 20 people all saying "yer, that was funny, +1" and instantly making a rather amusing comment blasted up and down like a yoyo (After the overrated mods kick in)
      you can have many more people saying "Funny=3" without the overrated mods. Concensus means its less likely to be over modded and doesnt bounce around.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
  6. hmm by d34thm0nk3y · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Amazon Settles Patent Suit For $40M theodp writes "In today's SEC filing, Amazon.com disclosed it will pay $40 million to settle an e-commerce patent infringement lawsuit that was reported earlier on Slashdot. The terms of the settlement also provide for dismissal of all claims and counterclaims and grant Amazon a nonexclusive license to Soverain's patent portfolio."

    Those who live by the sword die by the sword.

  7. Wrong comment? by GillBates0 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    (Our main engineer on the project has written a bit more about this to respond to your post.)

    The comment that Hadi Partovi points us to as a comment by his main engineer doesn't seem to be the right one. The one he linked to is by http://slashdot.org/~yagu and says the following:

    for me, the last line on the page:

    ©2005 Microsoft &nbsp

    kind of says it all... In their hurry to rip off the competition, they even forgot a semicolon ... Tsk-tsk!

    That criticizing clearly doesn't seem to be coming from an MSN guy. Who really is the informed MSN engineer posting/clarifying on /. and what really did he say?

    --
    An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
    1. Re:Wrong comment? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      I think she didn't quite get the right comment. Further down in the thread generated by that comment is this one, that's much more likely from the MSN guy:

      http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=157898&cid=132 29038

    2. Re:Wrong comment? by value_added · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The comment that Hadi Partovi points us to as a comment by his main engineer doesn't seem to be the right one...

      Maybe you're looking for the post that begins with:

      (I posted this as a new topic earlier. I hope I don't end up in karma hell for re-posting it as a reply like I should have...) ... I work on start.com and am one of the 3 folks on the team ...
      And ends with:
      I noticed one of the posts mention that we use a cookie. Yeah we do, we use it to index your settings on the back-end. The last thing we wanted to do was slap on a huge LOGIN TO PASSPORT page before you can even do anything since a) our target audience (you guys) would probably thing that was lame and wouldn't even try the site out and b) we use start.com too and *we* think that would be lame. We want people to check it out, kick the tires, give it a whirl, etc and a simple cookie works pretty well for now.
      Reading the previous statement, I wonder whether Microsoft would be less generally reviled if such expressions of humour and honesty were more common.
  8. Even further legitimizes this behavior.... by rolfwind · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Amazon Settles Patent Suit For $40M theodp writes "In today's SEC filing, Amazon.com disclosed it will pay $40 million to settle an e-commerce patent infringement lawsuit that was reported earlier on Slashdot. The terms of the settlement also provide for dismissal of all claims and counterclaims and grant Amazon a nonexclusive license to Soverain's patent portfolio."

    Wow, I depressed, $40M will only further strengthen the incentive on this patent behavior - I wish amazon stuck it out. Not that I care about amazon that much, but it only raises the barrier of entry for the little guys - especially on stupid shopping cart technology.

    FYI Soverain held patents on "shopping cart" technology.

    Here's another article on it:
    http://news.com.com/Amazon+pays+40+million+to+sett le+patent+dispute/2100-1030_3-5829193.html

  9. Undoubtedly by FlightTest · · Score: 2, Funny

    English to Slashdot.

    --
    Merde, il pleut encore!
  10. Retractions by Jeff+Molby · · Score: 2, Funny

    Since half of those amount to retractions, does that mean there will be a reduction in dupes for awhile?

    /It's a joke. I'm not that new here.

  11. Amazon being sneaky... by RexRhino · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It seems like Amazon is up to something sneaky by paying for this frivolous pantent portfolio, when Amazon surely has the legal clout to fight this kind of thing.

    Big companies like Amazon can afford to pay for these patents, but small companies cannot. They are losing money by paying for these things, but if they raise the cost of doing buisness beyond a certain point (if everyone has to pay millions to use patented technology in order to run an eccommerce site), they can knock out a lot of competition. There will be no chance for the mom and pop store selling used books can hope to compete with Amazon, because they won't be able to afford the startup cost or liability.

    I think a lot of big companies are encouraging this abuse of patent laws in order to squash competition from smaller companies who don't have a few million to spare.

  12. Not emptying the recycle bin?!?!? by everphilski · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... that's amateur! I mean heck, I was just interviewing for an entry level job and they wanted me to give them an email address that wasn't work related to communicate with. I mean, come on, if entry level employers are that sensitive, what is your million dollar arse doing talking to Google on a Microsoft computer?

    (Obligatory Napolean Dynamite quote)
    ....Idiot!

    -everphilski-

  13. Empty the recycle bin??? by lost+in+place · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you read the story, it was not a physical recycle bin, but the "Recycle Bin" on one of Lee's computers. Which makes it even more stupid that he would have such a document. If you're going to negotiate employment with a competitor, especially a potentially hostile/actionable move like this, for god's sake don't use your employer's computers to do it. Had Lee never heard of backup tapes or email scanning/archival? Amazing.

    1. Re:Empty the recycle bin??? by Black-Man · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Really... this guy is some genius being fought over by MS and Google?!? What does that say about those 2 companies.... sheesh.

  14. Following your lead? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    "but if you track the functionality and UI changes that the companies have made over the past 6 months, this has clearly been a place where Google has been following Microsoft's lead."

    Maybe, but if you look at the original start.com.. http://www.start.com/1/ its just a simple search bar. The second rev http://www.start.com/2/ adds some dhtml functionality, but only the third rev, http://www.start.com/3/ adds the identical dhtml section moving feature google has... probably after google came out with theirs.

    1. Re:Following your lead? by JanusFury · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Um, did you click the 'show' link on the first revision?

      --
      using namespace slashdot;
      troll::post();
  15. Hmm by smoondog · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Not surprised that Austrialia backdown from the Google security claims. It sounded a lot to me like they were using that stance for political reasons, given the PR nature of the release (instead of a quiet request to google).

  16. It's nice we have a recap but... by kinglink · · Score: 2

    I'm sorry the Microsoft stories both are hearsay, it's good to show both sides in their light, but I expect you ask Google for an opinion on the start page if you can. (and was Yahoo before both or what?, or who had the first discussion of it)

    In addition the story on the Recycle Bin sounds like an attempt to get suspicious news out to the public to poison the pool of jurors or such, However it's nontheless interesting, but again I'm waiting to hear the other side of the story.

    However this is nice, because it gives recaps to EVERY story I really was interested in this time.

    But I still think the best is the English to german to english to ./ish. :) Kudos to him for a great explination.

  17. Yeh but ... by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Now some patent lawsuit company has $40M to go after other companies, and Amazon has even more incentive to enforce its own stupid patents. More swords will be put into play. This is not good.

  18. Re:Mis-re-translationified by EvanED · · Score: 3, Funny

    Just for fun, I put the phrase "A penny saved is a penny earned" through Babelfish to translate to German and back (not my idea), and got the following:

    "A penny, which is stored, is an acquired penny."

  19. Re:Mis-re-translationified by Approaching.sanity · · Score: 2, Funny

    And from that to slashdot you get

    1.Save a Penny
    2. ?????
    3.Profit!!!!

    --
    RTFA again for the best results.
  20. Innovation you say? by iCEBaLM · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I discount every blurb from a microsoftie when it has two or more instances of the word "innovation" contained therein.

    This particular one has three.

    Why does everything spoken by anyone associated in any way with microsoft have to have so many copies of the word "innovation" in it? I submit to you that their use of the english language is as "innovative" as they are, simple rehashes and reusing the same old tired components, perhaps rearranged in a different way, with nothing actually new.

    Microsofties: quit using the word "innovation", it just makes you look like a drone in the collective.

  21. Why we love Google by Frank+T.+Lofaro+Jr. · · Score: 2, Funny

    Slashdot has Google Page Rank 9. :)

    I think only Google itself has 10.

    Google is popular because, quite simply, it works, and works well.

    The company appears to be a benevolent giant, full of geeks and geek friendly.

    And they are a very important player on the Internet.

    I probably average 2 dozen Google queries a day or so - it is an extremely useful website which makes the Internet as a whole a lot more useful.

    Also, the story of Google is the story of some very smart people becoming rich because of their knowlege and innovation (real innovation), not because of inheritence, popularity, social standing, etc.

    It is a geek success story of the first order.

    So it is only natural there are a lot of Google stories here.

    --
    Just because it CAN be done, doesn't mean it should!
  22. my.msn.com by ScottyH · · Score: 2, Informative

    But microsoft has my.msn.com WAY before google, which had all sorts of column dragging stuff in it. It was kind of buggy though, and didn't work in firefox.

  23. The classic case by The_Wilschon · · Score: 3, Funny

    "The spirit is willing but the flesh is weak."

    English->Russian->English

    "The vodka is great but the meat is rotten."

    --
    SIGSEGV caught, terminating

    wait... not that kind of sig.
    1. Re:The classic case by Alsee · · Score: 2, Funny

      Isn't that the sign posed at every diner in Russia?

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  24. The penny is the penny is won by the preservation. by Analogue+Kid · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well, I can't help myself. Living in a county where direct translations into English are a constant amusment, where it's common to see things like "four season tiger soup" or even "crow-dragon tea" on menus, I can't resist...If you babelfish "A penny saved is a penny earned." into Chinese and back again, you get:

    "The penny is the penny is won by the preservation"

    --
    I'm a gnu world man.