Slashdot Mirror


Businesses To Be Censored on Use of Olympics

pitpe writes "The BBC reports that the proposed London 2012 Olympics Bill bans the use of words related to the Olympics by non-sponsors, including 'Olympic', '2012', 'gold', 'summer' and 'games', amongst others. The bill is aimed at ensuring corporate sponsors, who have provided £790m of the IOC's £2.25bn marketing revenue over the last four years, will not be deterred by 'ambush marketing' where rivals to the official sponsors try to take advantage, but businesses warn it could make it technically illegal for pubs to use chalkboards to flag up coverage of the Games." From the article: "The London 2012 website has already posted a warning listing a string of Olympic-related words and images that are off limits to all but official sponsors. And advertisers' representatives have criticised the new Olympics bill because they believe it will make it almost impossible for most companies to even acknowledge that the Games are happening without getting into trouble. "

30 of 520 comments (clear)

  1. UK Govt Introduces Reserved Olympic Letter Law by Saint+Aardvark · · Score: 5, Funny
    LONDON (AP) - The UK government today introduced a bill into parliament that, if adopted, would allow the International Olympic Committee (IOC) to reserve use of certain letters and digits, including "O", "2", "L", and "g" through "r", to businesses who had signed official Olympic sponsorship agreements.

    Prime Minister Tony Blair passionately, though unintelligibly, defended the controversial law, saying that "t[h]e I[O]C s [h]ave [it] [q]uite cl[ea]r that [o]ur role [is] [t]o def[en]d the i[n]ve[stm]en[t]s of [l]egiti[mat]e [adve]rti[s]er[s]" who have signed on with the IOC.

    Blair also pointed to the limited timeframe of the bill, which only allows surveillance during a two-year period before and after the bill, and said that this showed that public opinion had been considered strongly during the formulation period. "[Wh]at m[or]e [d]o th[ey] wa[nt]?" he asked rhetorically

    Free Software Foundation founder and figurehead Richard M. Stallman was unavailable comment. A source close to the activist said that "he's working on renaming GCC in Cyrillic".

    1. Re:UK Govt Introduces Reserved Olympic Letter Law by moviepig.com · · Score: 5, Funny

      J.K. Rowling has suggested referring to 'the-events-who-must-not-be-named'. Support for the proposal has come from Jane (formerly "Olympia") Dukakis...

      --
      Seeing bad movies only encourages them. Watch responsibly
    2. Re:UK Govt Introduces Reserved Olympic Letter Law by famebait · · Score: 4, Funny

      Or one could take a cue from the Apple engineers who were sued by Carl Sagan for internally code-naming their project "Sagan" without paying him, and promptly changed the internal name to "Asshole Astronomer". For which they were sued a second time by Carl Sagan, presumably in an attempt to convince the world that he was in fact not an asshole, *snigger*.

      The "Asshole Games"(tm)?

      Has a certain ring^H^H^H^Hasshole to it, doesn't it?.

      Alternatively, one could solicit a bid from microsoft to buy the entire british language, so that any use outside properly licensed Microsoft products incurs extra fees, includiong from the IOC. Just think how much money the government could make!

      --
      sudo ergo sum
  2. Yeah, and a band too... by garcia · · Score: 5, Interesting

    They won't allow The Olympic Hopefuls to use Olympic in their name either. It's amazing that this crap was written in to law. Now the band has to change to "The Hopefuls".

    Seriously, I love how they were given powers over a word that was around LONG before "The Games" were.

    What a bunch of shit.

  3. news reporting by paper_boats · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Does this extend to mean that only the sponsoring news organizations can report on olympic news. Sounds tricky.

    1. Re:news reporting by InvalidError · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well, yes actually.

      Some athletes ran into pretty big troubles from blogging and posting their own videos during the last olympic "games". The big media went pretty far out of their way to clamp down on everything and it really sucks. Almost every event is locked down with regional exclusivity deals.

      If you go to the games, any written, photographic, audio and video content you may acquire must be for your own exclusive use only or you risk having the media lawyers on your back.

      My guess is that this will only get much worse before some sense is knocked back in this messy circus act.

  4. Right by PunkOfLinux · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And the word summer NEVER comes up in normal conversation. Nor does the word 2012 come up either...

    I can see it now
    Tom: "Hey, I can't wait till the summer of 2012 becau--"
    Trademark Police: "Stop right there, infringer!"
    Tom: "I didn't do anything wrong!"
    Trademark Police: "According to this law you did. Those words are trademarked."
    Tom: "How the hell did they trademark a year and a season?!"
    Pitiful

  5. unreasonable gits... by Travelsonic · · Score: 5, Interesting
    From the "London 2012" website:
    You can support the 2012 Games by not engaging in the unauthorised use of the Olympic Marks

    Yeah? If by "engaging in the unauthorised use of the Olympic Marks" you mean by using them at all, how about you respect the people, and not make such fuchking unreasoanble demands in the first place?

    --
    If you believe in privacy, and believe you have "nothing to hide" at the same time, you're a goddammed idiot
  6. This is nothing new by winkydink · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The IOC has always been very vigorous in defending the branding rights to the games. They even tried to get the Special Olympics to change before the public backlash made them decide to change their minds.

    Think about it. If you're Coca-Cola (or some other huge multinational) that's spending 8-9 figures to be the "official whatever of the Olympics", you're going to want to be pretty sure that your competitor isn't going to just say the same thing unofficially. Pretty sure in this case means contractual language with teeth. Hence, the IOC turning around and doing the same thing.

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    1. Re:This is nothing new by Maestro4k · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Think about it. If you're Coca-Cola (or some other huge multinational) that's spending 8-9 figures to be the "official whatever of the Olympics", you're going to want to be pretty sure that your competitor isn't going to just say the same thing unofficially. Pretty sure in this case means contractual language with teeth. Hence, the IOC turning around and doing the same thing. Sure, and it's reasonable to expect that your competitors can't imply they're official sponsors. But this is going way beyond that, a quote from the article:

      But the new bill will make it illegal to combine words like "games", "medals", "gold", "2012", "sponsor" or "summer" in any form of advertising.

      Heaven help you if you're having a conference of some kind in London in the summer of 2012, you might get heavily fined when you try to promote it, even if it has _nothing_ to do with the Olympics, occurs at a different time (well it'd kind of have to since the city will likely be packed because of the Olympics) or date.

      If you make games for children better make sure you don't inadvertantly advertise any as summer games, you'll break this law. Again, you could be advertising a glorified lawn sprinkler for kids to play games under in the summer heat but since you "combined" summer and games in your ad the law applies and you're screwed.

      I'm sure you'll say "but they'll be reasonable and won't pursue those types of cases" but we already know how well that type of stuff works. You can find many cases of the RIAA & MPAA sending out Cease & Desist letters because they found files containing words that also are used in songs/movies they own but had nothing to do with them. I seem to remember one where the C&D referred to a file that was around 500kb in size, but the MPAA thought it was one of their movies. Rationality won't enter into the enforcement of this law, it'll get the same treatment, anything that looks like it applies will get slapped with at least a lawyergram and likely charges levied. Even if they company ends up off the hook they'll have paid a penalty for defending themselves for doing nothing wrong.

      No matter how you look at it this is a very bad law, and very bad precedent. Why should the IOC be given sole ownership of common words beyond Olympic/Olympics? Most of those words are used a lot, and in non-olympic references. Even if you think the words are defensible, including the damn year is insane. I suppose everyone in London will have to be sure to avoid mentioning the year in advertising in 2012 just to be on the safe side.

  7. Already in the US by interiot · · Score: 5, Insightful

    See 36 USC 220506... the US has had the same law for a long time. The Olympic commitee has even tried to be quite heavy-handed about it, on more than one occasion.

  8. Advertise this by DeadBugs · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So established businesses in London, who have contributed tax dollars for years to the city do not get to benefit from the event being there. The whole reason to have the games in London is so that the IOC can profit? Are businesses that do not sponsor the Olympics banned from doing business with people who show up for the games?

    It won't be long until athletes are winning bronze, silver and gold coke cans.

    --
    http://www.kubuntu.org/
  9. I have an idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How about we just cut the crap and stop trying to stop people from simply living. This is common sense; why are we letting corporate sponsors yet again judge where we can use common words in every day life because they're deemed competitive or inapprpriate? I don't even mean the words like "summer" or "games". If I want to throw up a sign that celebrates the Olympics, I should be able to for whatever reason.

    Maybe we can start a new trend of just selling our human rights for profit! Because right now they're just being stolen.

    1. Re:I have an idea... by uncoveror · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Common sense? That's a misnomer. Sense is not a common thing at all, at least in these times. Now that a business can't even say trademarked words if they aren't official sponsors, how long will it be until we are all so censored? "Intellectual Property", whether trademark or copyright, has become even more valuable than things that actually exist and can be held in your hand. This is stupid!

      The saddest part of this is that the modern Olympics were supposed to be a showcase for amateur athletics, and a global moment of peace and understanding, not something for greedy businessmen to get rich off of.

      --
      The Uncoveror: It's the real news.
  10. Re:Banning the use of the year? by El+Cubano · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No kidding.

    Other banned words include games, medals, gold, silver, bronze, 2012, sponsor, summer

    I guess a jewelry store owner would be forbidden from advertising: "Come and see our great selection of gold and silver on sale this starting this summer. No payments until 2012."

    This is positively ridiculous.

  11. Suggested Ad Terminology by DoctorMabuse · · Score: 5, Funny

    The international athletic event that takes place where city officials are willing to provide the biggest bribes to the committee is now in London.

    or

    The international athletic event where people from all countries use performance-enhancing drugs is now in London (and no it's not the Tour de France).

  12. I, for on, am all in favor of this. by Rahga · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "And advertisers' representatives have criticised the new Olympics bill because they believe it will make it almost impossible for most companies to even acknowledge that the Games are happening without getting into trouble."

    Good. It's time to kill of the olympics.

    A event like this only means something when the organization running it isn't corrupt from top to bottom. They have the nerve to tell ticket holders that "You can't drink Dr. Pepper here, but you can buy a $20 can of Coke! Coke is it!". The "Olympic Village" is now corporate-sponsored Sodom and Gomorrah. Home improvement companies spend millions on advertisements to say that they are proud to support their olympians ("You've got no marketable skills outside of athletics, so as long as you work 9-to-5 for minimum wage, we've got your back!").... I'm absolutley not surprised to see London sell themselves out by grabbing the Olympic bid.

    Now, if nobody CAN mention the Olympics, perhaps they'll just go away. We'll all be better off for it.

  13. Re:So, what else is new? by geekoid · · Score: 4, Funny

    becasue I expected to have an ungodly heap of money by now.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  14. There won't be olympics in 2012 anyways... by ModernGeek · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... our time traveling friend John Titor said there won't be Olympics after 2004 (dunno if this counts for the '06 winter olympics or not) due to too much conflict over the entire thing. It isn't until 2036 until they try and start it all back up again. I can't wait for this civil war to start, I'm gonna quit my job and head to the hills. I've learned to embrace his prophecy and understand the true meaning of life thanks to Titor.

    For those who don't know about John Titor


    P.S. Anyone know where I can find that video of him traveling time in his car when he goes BACK TO THE FUTURE?

    --
    Sig: I stole this sig.
  15. Re:Ahh, Europe! by kindbud · · Score: 4, Informative
    Heck, even this "bill/law" would be too much for us in the USA.

    The USA has had similar laws with respect to the Olympics for some time now.

    The Olympic trademarks protected by statute (36 U.S.C. 220506(c)) include: the name "UNITED STATES OLYMPIC COMMITTEE"; the symbol of the International Olympic Committee, consisting of five interlocking rings; the words "Olympic, " "Olympiad" and "Citius Altius Fortius," and also the words "Paralympic," "Paralympiad," "Pan-American" and "America Espirito Sport Fraternite," or any combination of these words; the emblem of the United States Olympic Committee, consisting of an escutcheon having a blue chief and vertically extending red and white bars on the base with five interlocking rings displayed on the chief; and the symbols of the International Paralympic Committee and the Pan-American Sports Organization, consisting of a torch surrounded by concentric rings.


    Not just trademark law, but a special statute protects the Olympic trademarks.

    See INTA for more info about this, and of course, the text of 36 USC 220506 itself.

    By statute, the USOC may file a civil action against any person if that person, without consent of the USOC, uses the Olympic trademarks for the purpose of trade, to induce the sale of any goods or services, or to promote any theatrical exhibition, athletic performance, or competition. A showing of actual consumer confusion, or even a likelihood of such confusion, is not necessary for the USOC to prevail. ... The USOC is also not required to show that an unauthorized use of the Olympic trademarks is occurring in connection with goods or services similar to those on which the USOC has previously authorized use.


    Basically, the USOC owns these words and symbols exclusively, by Act of Congress. The UK is merely "harmonizing" with the USA.
    --
    Edith Keeler Must Die
  16. Actually, it's a great opportunity. by jd · · Score: 4, Funny

    Think about it. Stores all over the country will have signs saying things like: "Get The Goods on a Barely Legal Date!", "Banned Substances at Discount Prices!" and "We Can't Say What We're Selling, but Come In And Get Some!"

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  17. Well, Im screwed twice today then by AnotherEscobar · · Score: 4, Funny

    My plans for www.2012olympicgold.xxx are now officially on hold

    http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/08/16/15 38243&tid=153&tid=95&tid=103&tid=219

  18. It's called the golden rule.. by MAdMaxOr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    He who has the gold, makes the rules.

    BTW, At current exchange rates, this rule was bought at a price of 108 standard tons of gold. I was hoping to see how many Libraries of Congress that would fill, but that's only 181 cu. ft. Kinda disappointing really.

  19. A few years back by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    About a decade ago, when the Olypics were in the US, there was a pizza delivery business in the same city as the games. It was named "Olypic Pizza".

    The olypic games' sponsorship branch sued the pants off the small-business owner, to get him to change the name of his business. Eventually he had to relent, after the legal fees nearly bankrupted him.

    Why did he fight it? Simple. The store was NAMED AFTER HIM, and he had been in business WITH A TRADEMARK ON "OLYPIC PIZZA" FOR OVER 10 YEARS!

    So because the olypic sponsors didn't to eal with the "ambush advertising" this guy represented, he had to give up the business name he had in the area FIRST, his trademark, and couldn't even use his full name during local interviews.

    Screw the olympics, and boycott every single damn company that sponsors them!

  20. Re:The games formerly known as the olymipcs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    The solution:

    "07YM91CS"

    And people said l33t would never catch on.

  21. Advertising template for non sponsors by fireman+sam · · Score: 5, Funny

    The London 2012 Olympic organisation has released this template for all companies that have not obtained a sponsorship deal.

    Example only:

    (Black screen)

    (each line of text fades in to white while the line is being read)

    Voiceover: "You know why you are here,
                            We know why you are here,
                            We cannot say why you are here,
                            While you are here,
                            Eat at Hungry Jacks."

    (fade in corporate logo)

    (fade to black)

    --
    it is only after a long journey that you know the strength of the horse.
  22. Sponsors to demand Olympic Letter Management (OLM) by xixax · · Score: 5, Funny

    LOMDON (AP) - A consortium of corporate sponsors today announced the Olympic Letter Management (OLM) initiative to enact mandatory technological measures to prevent uncontrolled use of alphabetic characters to steal valueable Intellectual Property.

    "It's outrageuous!" exclaimed OLM spokesperson Bert Kneecapper, "After TrendySportingShoe(TM) spends billions buying Olympic (TM) naming rights, some thieving punk can steal our trademarks using a 20c crayon bought from any corner store!"

    Under the OLM initiative, and device capable of reproducing alphabetic characters must implement a mechanism to honour the OLM Tradkemark flag, thereby preventing the device from reproducing trademarked sequences unless a valid licence exists. With time, they intend the service to extend to the enforcement of other text controls, such as micro-payments for use of famous quotes, and retrospective editing of history books.

    Bert Kneecapper went on reject crayon manufacturer representations that the scheme was impractical, "Our members lose billions of dollars in un-earned revenue, how can they justify 20c crayons in the face of such flagerant theft?".

    --
    "Everything is adjustable, provided you have the right tools"
  23. Oh come on by MochaMan · · Score: 5, Funny

    Where's your Olympic* spirit my friend?

    * (c), (R), Patent Pending, void where prohibited by law. "Olympic" is a registered trademark of the International Olympic Comittee. All materials and content related to the Olympic Games, including, but not limited to, images, illustrations, text, audio clips, and video clips, are protected by or consist of copyrights, trademarks, service marks, and/or other intellectual property rights ("Intellectual Property"). The Intellectual Property is governed and protected by United States and worldwide copyright, trademark, and/or other intellectual property laws and treaty provisions, privacy and publicity laws, and communications regulations and statutes. The Intellectual Property is owned or controlled by us or other parties that have licensed to us the right to use their Intellectual Property or the right to market their products and/or services (collectively the "IP Providers").

    You agree to abide by all additional copyright notices, information, or restrictions contained in any material or content on the Site. Other than as may be expressly permitted by us, in writing, (i) the Intellectual Property is provided solely for your personal, non-commercial use; and you may download any Intellectual Property solely for your personal, non-commercial use, consistent with these Terms, provided that you maintain all copyright and other notices contained in such Intellectual Property. You may not copy, reproduce, republish, upload, post, transmit, distribute, and/or exploit any Intellectual Property in any way (including by e-mail or other electronic means) without our prior written consent or that of the IP Providers - particularly the words 'Olympic', 'games', 'gold', 'silver', 'bronze', 'doping scandal', 'bribery', and other words that are implicit in the Olympic Games. Modification of any Intellectual Property or use of any Intellectual Property for any other purpose is a violation of the copyrights, trademark rights, and other proprietary rights; that includes photoshopped naughty images of Jacques Rogge. The use of any Intellectual Property on any other site or networked computer environment, or maintaining unauthorized links to the Site, is prohibited by these Terms.

  24. Has it been four years already? by B747SP · · Score: 4, Insightful
    This stuff is all standard when the Five Ringed Circus comes to town. Back when Sydney, Australia had its turn in 2000, all the same stuff went on.

    When you consider that Australia (the city of Melbourne, Australia strictly speaking), has the highest population of Greek folks of any city in the world outside of Greece (and Sydney isn't too far behind) then you can bet your bottom dollar that there's going to be a fair swag of small "Mom-and-Pop" businesses, corner stores, etc with some form of 'Olypic' in the name.

    Our newspapers regularly carried stories of small businesses being steamrollered by IOC Corporation and its hired thugs (by hired thugs, I mean the government of the host country).

    Another common story was the officials and security being briefed to look out for spectators and general public wearing promotional gear (hats, t-shirts, etc) from companies that competed with official sponsors. A coca cola t-shirt for example would leave you being offered the choice of handing it over, covering up, or going home.

    Despite all the talk of leaving town for the duration, etc, etc, I did end up sticking around (but I didn't get involved in any of the events organised by IOC Corporation). Strangely, Sydney was a really really nice place to be for those two weeks. Many people dreaded the five ringed circus coming to town, but by the time they packed up their tents and their wagons and rolled out of town again, many of the same were sad to see them go.

    That ain't no excuse for steam rollering thousands of little people in the name of corporate greed though. IOC Corporation has NOTHING to do with sport, excellence, peace, tradition or ANY of that nice stuff - it's about corporations and hired governments pumping the people for money.

    Me, I make careful note of the companies that sponsor IOC Corporation, and put them on my personal do not buy list for life.

    --
    I find your ideas intriguing and I wish to subscribe to your newsletter.
  25. Re:Ah, the Olympics by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No doubt. The way the Olympics have been run in recent memory is sad. They guard anything that has to do with the olympics so closely, any spirit of friendly compitition has been lost.

    I remember a few years ago, atheletes weren't able to keep and publish an online journal about their experiences, so fans could get an unspoiled perspective of what the atheletes saw. That's bordering on insane.

    To make matters worse, television coverage of the games is miserable. In an hour of coverage, you'll get 15 minutes of commericals, 25 minutes of sappy "human interest" stories (This is young Nadia's first olympic games *cue heart strings music* she had to face a lot of challenges to get here, because just two years before the games, her belowed cat Mittens died from old age), 10 minutes of "what you'll see later on" and mindless chatter of the comentators ("You know, Bob, the sun that comes out over Athens during the day is the exact same sun that shines over America." "No, I didn't know that. That's so fascinating, especially since America is so far away", and a whopping 10 minutes of actual coverage of atheletic compitition.

    I'm not kidding.

    Essentially, the commericalism of the games have robbed it of its soul, and America's TV coverage has made it unwatchable. And forget about trying to enjoy the opening ceremonies; the commentators must be paid by the word, because they don't know when the shut up.

    --
    The Internet is generally stupid