Slashdot Mirror


Watch Like Device for At-Risk Patients

DigitalDame writes "At-risk patients will soon have a little help from a device worn on the wrist that can measure vital signs including pulse rate, cardiac rhythm (ECG or EKG), and blood oxygen levels. It can either store the data and transmit it to a medical center at a later time or, in the case of an emergency, transmit the information in real time using the built-in cellular phone while sending an alarm to a caregiver."

176 comments

  1. Hacking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These machines dont sound very hard to fool.......

  2. Nice by TarryTops · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Let's hope that it'll save some lives.

    --
    Java Oracle Linux Enthusiast
    1. Re:Nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really was hoping the opposite. It sounds like some doomsdevice which could be used for evil!

    2. Re:Nice by TarryTops · · Score: 1

      Well , our amazing capacity for succimbing to stupidity will eventually help us out of our misery. If you know what I mean.

      --
      Java Oracle Linux Enthusiast
    3. Re:Nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If you know what I mean.
      You mean, ceding our national sovereignty to hostile aliens and their agitating overlords?
    4. Re:Nice by cluckshot · · Score: 2, Informative

      This is the beginning of the export from control by the medical establishment of Pulse Oximetry. These devices have been for quite some time used in hospitals.

      Now if we could get extracted from the clutches of the US-FDA the control over such devices expecially the optical devices used for Blood Sugar Monitoring which are made in the USA and cannot be sold here but are used world wide.... *Yes I am an RN*

      --
      Never Politically Correct ~ I prefer the facts If you don't like what I say, get a life, or comment yourself.
    5. Re:Nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It looks and sounds like it will cause cancer!

      I'll just strap this microwave to my wrist...

  3. Anyone else.. by mike2R · · Score: 4, Funny

    Read that as at risk patents?

    --
    This sig all sigs devours
    1. Re:Anyone else.. by Nuskrad · · Score: 0

      I did! I was wondering if it beeped everytime Microsoft filed a patent

    2. Re:Anyone else.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was just about to say the same thing.

      Like patents are bad... but that would have been going a little far.

      See billy check his watch: "Yes! I own the iPod!"

    3. Re:Anyone else.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I did! I was wondering if it beeped everytime Microsoft filed a patent

      If that were the case, it would really just be a continuous tone...

    4. Re:Anyone else.. by themoodykid · · Score: 1

      Yup, I thought it was a Google Alert-like system for patents in the queue that may be harmful in the near future.

    5. Re:Anyone else.. by zlogic · · Score: 1

      Me too!
      If I wouldn't have read "patents" in the header I wouldn't have bothered reading TFA.

    6. Re:Anyone else.. by TeXMaster · · Score: 0

      me too ...

      --
      "I'm never quite so stupid as when I'm being smart" (Linus van Pelt)
    7. Re:Anyone else.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I read what you said as "at risk patients" and wondered how it was different. Then decided you were being niggly in some way and that it was about "at-risk" versus "at risk" and thus I decided to read the comments to your post to see what all the fuss was about.

      It's funny how we can all read what we want to read :)

    8. Re:Anyone else.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


          Read it as Watch Like Devices at Risk from Patents.

          Now that's a worry.

    9. Re:Anyone else.. by hosecoat · · Score: 1

      yep

    10. Re:Anyone else.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay you've had enough slashdot...

  4. Yes, but privacy? by vidarlo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I can see that this will be a nice help, but neverthless, I'm in doubt about units that do monitor people like this. Maybe people that ill should be in a hospital, not walking around in the streets? What is important is at least that people are knowing of what those devices do, and to their consequences.

    I also think it should be stated by law that doctors do not need to report any data gathered by this to police, except in case of warrant order. There's enough surveilance methods as-is.

    And most important: Don't misuse it. Use it for what it is worth, but ensure that it is the best solution.

    1. Re:Yes, but privacy? by pHatidic · · Score: 3, Funny

      Especially since it effectively calls the cops every time you look at porn.

    2. Re:Yes, but privacy? by Vo0k · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Maybe people that ill should be in a hospital, not walking around in the streets?

      You're missing the point: Let them out from hospitals. What worth is your life if you're to spend the rest of it in the hospital bed? These people prefer to risk their lives and spend some of their time with the family, outdoors, just living, instead of being stuck in hospitals. This device lowers the risk they are willing to take anyway.
      I spent a month in hospital and I was going crazy from boredom. Now think of spending all your life there... A week outside is worth more than a year there.

      --
      Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
    3. Re:Yes, but privacy? by TopSpin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Maybe people that ill should be in a hospital, not walking around in the streets?

      The presumption being the patient is being denied sufficient attention? As someone with actual experience with real patients I can tell you that the reality is the patients would rather not spend years of their lives living out of a hospital due to some chronic condition. We have no end of drugs and therapy that enable people to continue living with serious conditions that would have killed them in the recent past. They live among you, one pill to the next, occasionally calling in EMTs to handle the more dramatic moments, and they want to spend no more time in a hospital than you.

      --
      Lurking at the bottom of the gravity well, getting old
    4. Re:Yes, but privacy? by kfg · · Score: 4, Interesting

      "Maybe people that ill should be in a hospital, not walking around in the streets?"

      I don't see myself wearing one of these things, but I could, by certain definitions, be considered "at risk."

      But I am not ill, per se. I do not even vaguely belong in a hospital. Think about people with severe allergies. Bee stings, peanuts, whatever. Perfectly healthy, but at high risk of going into anaphylactic shock. There are any number of other conditions which carry extreme risks, but which don't really count as illness and for which hospitalization would be a silly waste, both for them and for the hospital.

      They're risk conditions. A walking emergency if you like. A chronic condition, but with no acute symptoms requiring actual direct intervention.

      I do, on occasion, wear a data recording heart monitor wrist watch that works by radio telemetry, although it does not transmit to a remote location. I guess someone could aim a receiver at me to pick up the signals, but. . .

      I'm absolutely clueless as to what use this data would be to the police, and I'm one of "privacy freaks" around here.

      In any case, as this is medical data it is already privileged by law.

      KFG

    5. Re:Yes, but privacy? by phobos13013 · · Score: 1

      I would suggest you arent too familar with the healthcare sector... A major law been enacted in the last two years that revolutionized how privacy issues are handled in the healthcare industry. The HIPPAA law has created quite frankly an almost overwhelming weight of regulations regarding patient and information privacy issues that are difficult to wade through as a healthcare worker. Nonetheless, i assure you nothing like this would even be considered for practical use unless very stringent requirements of privacy were considered.

      --
      ...and it should be known by now
    6. Re:Yes, but privacy? by xtracto · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah! I agree, I do not know what will happen to me if I was obligued to be in a bed 24/7, you see, the only thing I could do is at most, to be in front of my notebook (with or without internet) reading slashdot and/or programming... I would lose all the marvelous things the nature has awaiting for me on the outside!

      Oh... wait... nevermind

      --
      Ubuntu is an African word meaning 'I can't configure Debian'
    7. Re:Yes, but privacy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I'm absolutely clueless as to what use this data would be to the police ..."

      Perhaps its value might be more useful for the coroner for better determining the cause of death. I mean that as far as sometimes, a stroke and a heart attack can have similar apparent symptoms, such as numbness on the left side, and of course severe pain.

      No, I do not think this should be mandatory for anyone simply at risk for anaphylactic shock -- people at risk should be prepared with medication, and hopefully there will be enough time to realize the problem before a loss of consciousness (I do not have any severe allergies so I don't really know how fast things may progress).

      As far as the people who should be greatly encouraged to wear one, I'd suggest people like my grandmother. She's nearly 80 years old, and she hides her ailments in order to seem stronger than she is. she lives in a nursing home and she's often in need of respiratory and occasionally cardiac treatment (though no cardica arrest yet). She has the same right to take trips with the rest of the residents. And there hsould be nothing stopping me from being allowed to take my Gramma somewhere other than the nursing home. but I lack the knowledge to diagnose a problem. If the watch is set to alarm due to certain heart rate and/or respiratory rate, I would feel much safer on those visits.

    8. Re:Yes, but privacy? by oxnyx · · Score: 1

      This sound like the type of item that someone who's very ill but wants to be at home needs. It's a lot cheaper to say have a team of doctors and nurse with cars then a hospital and having at home visits for people who can't aford a nuring home or are living with relatives at work all day could bring a lot of peace of mind. I doubt more then an idea number would be attached and is likly reprogramable. Tho home visiting sound pricly to those of you in the US who gov. refuses to give access to free health care. in Canada having at home delation machines with a nurse that comes over each morning to unplug people and each evening to plug them in has really improved wait times in hospitals, and quilty of like for the folk get the delation cause they get clean blood every morning. Anyway doctors already have a confidensaled loop in the law. With good reason if this are high risk people then it's unlikely there going to be going for a walk to rob the back.

      --
      Life is like untied shoe laces; it always tripping you up and getting in your way.
    9. Re:Yes, but privacy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One feature I'd like to see in this would be a GPS that sends location information to the doctor and the caregiver if something serious happens, so that if the wearer's caregiver can't get to the wearer in time, the doctor could alert 911 and tell them where to go to pick you up.

      The police would have an interest in the data if the manufacturer added more sensors to this, say a pseudo-breathalizer that sampled the air around you and could indicate if you were legally drunk. Similarly, if there are some physical symptoms associated with use of certain illegal drugs that the watch's sensors could detect, and the watch was programmed to call police when it detected those signs ...

    10. Re:Yes, but privacy? by LifesABeach · · Score: 1

      OK, grandpa will bite.

      How could the police use my EKG to arrest me?

    11. Re:Yes, but privacy? by Ihlosi · · Score: 1
      How could the police use my EKG to arrest me?



      Maybe not to arrest you, but it can definitely make you a suspect. Heart rate goes up when you see a cop ? Suspicious. Heart rate goes up in the vicinity of certain buildings ? Suspicious. And in some places of the world, being suspicious can get you killed.

    12. Re:Yes, but privacy? by drmike0099 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The only thing doctors are required by law to report is information regarding abuse and violence in the home (domestic/spousal/child/elderly abuse). The rest already does require a warrant.

    13. Re:Yes, but privacy? by ComputerSlicer23 · · Score: 1
      Uhhh, I'm fairly sure HIPPAA has been around for a lot longer then 2 years. I had to deal with it in one form or another 6-8 years ago.

      HIPPAA is only as good as the people who have the data, and the oversight that is administered. I know I had patient data on a CD in my apartment for 4 years with a complete patient data set from a hospital I was doing some data conversion work for. I forgot they gave me an eval copy to spec out a bid for it. I turned it in when I realized I still had it, but in theory I could have sold the information for a small fortune on the black market. It had all the apropriate info to be used to forge SSN cards for illegal immigrants, all the information needed to apply for a credit card, or open a bank account. For extra bonus is had all that for people who were both alive and dead.

      I wouldn't ever have done it, but realized that I had an opportunity to do it if I had felt like it.

      Kirby

    14. Re:Yes, but privacy? by LurkerXXX · · Score: 1
      The medical data, what your heart rate was, etc, is privileged information. Any GPS data about where are are at any given time isn't.

      Just as the police can't tap a lawyers phone to find out what a client is saying to them. But it is legal, with a warrent, for them to look at phone records to see what phone numbers/locations the calls were placed from.

    15. Re:Yes, but privacy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I pass by the Jewish center, heart rate goes up. I pass by the Islamic center, heart rate really goes up. Conclsion, I'm a terrorist for one side or the other? Not really, both of these ass hole hostles act like the Hatfields and McCoys; They know each other, they inner marry, and share the same mother in laws. Their between me and my work place. only one road in, one road out. It sucks. Police haul my old fat hairy ass in for questioning. Ask me why my heart goes up when I walk by the above mentioned centers. Heart rate really really goes up now. I'm Agnostic! Now I'm jerk away from the police because the F.B.I. think I'm a clone of bin Ladin. I can't even grow a beard! I'm looking at my heart wondering how my rib cage can hold it? My bio monitaring device is smoking! The Department of Homeland Insecurity drags me away from the scared looks of the F.B.I. They say I'm on a one way trip to Gontonnamo, (where ever in hell that place is), Prison were they will weld my door shut. But they'll give me a copy of the Tara, and Koran. Great! I can't read Hebrew, or Arabic. T^T, I just wanted to go to work this morning where my job is to write security software for credit card applications.

      And my eldest daughter says, "Sucks to be you." XP

    16. Re:Yes, but privacy? by phobos13013 · · Score: 1

      Well you are right, the law was passed in 1996, but was finished and began being enforced in 2003. If you havent worked in a hospital environment in this time. The HIPAA hysteria was not as bad as it is today. It is very difficult to know all the rules and when to use them and when to not, and most workers are very concerned whether this or that action violates the law as they should be! And I can assure you, even the possibility of taking those records home today of which you speak would be completely illegal. Even providing information to police without a warrant as parent to my original comment is illegal. Just because you could sell them and make money and didnt do it, which obviously NEVER crossed your mind :), doesnt mean it wasnt illegal. And your statement could be changed to any law really. "DMCA is only as good as the people who use it and oversee it, e.g." At any rate, i was trying to point out that the privacy of such a device would be crucially considered by the organizations that would authorize its use.

      --
      ...and it should be known by now
  5. Other uses for this tech by meditation_dude · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This would be great for protecting VIPs. You could integrate GPS too, so the health and location of the VIP (e.g. president) are known at all times. Heck, you could even monitor stress levels when they're negotiating with a foreign leader or something. Seems like this could also be integrated into those parole ankle braclets people where, i.e. no vital signs, prisoner tampered with braclet (or maybe is dying).

    1. Re:Other uses for this tech by Vo0k · · Score: 1

      Yeppers. Boris Yeltsin (sp?) negotiating over cell phone with a rebel leader, while the military traces the call. The guy was blown out with a rocket that first was guided at the base station coordinates and then homed on the cell phone signal.
      Neat to have all VIPs under such surveilance :)

      --
      Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
    2. Re:Other uses for this tech by Saxerman · · Score: 1
      This would be great for protecting VIPs. You could integrate GPS too, so the health and location of the VIP (e.g. president) are known at all times.

      Would you really want to be sending a wireless signal announcing the location of your VIP (and his vitals to those who wants to crack your encryption) to anyone who wants to listen? Typically the DocWagon High-Threat Response teams are only alerted when the VIP manually triggers an alert, the bracelet is removed improperly, or your vitals drop and trigger an emergency. Which means the Bad Guys could potentially jam your signal if they knew ahead of time (and had the Electronics skill or Flux Pool needed.)

      --

      A steaming cup of soykaf would be real wiz right now.

    3. Re:Other uses for this tech by jc42 · · Score: 1

      Boris Yeltsin (sp?)

      Hey, the correct spelling is " ".

      Jeez; why are the people here such sloppy spellers?

      (Actually, I had to look it up at wikipedia, because I didn't remember whether the '' was hard or soft. Hardly anyone ever gets this right in the English transliterations. ;-)

      Now to see if /. can actually handle simple UTF8 encodings. It looks fine on my screen, and cut-and-paste to several other browser windows here on my Mac PB seems to work ok. But there is still software lurking out there that can't handle anything but ASCII.

      The quoted string in the first paragraph above should contain his name spelled correctly; i.e., in the Russian version of the Cyrillic alphabet. No spelling using the Roman alphabet can really be correct, of course.

      Yet another vote for overly-picky corect spelings ...

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    4. Re:Other uses for this tech by Forbman · · Score: 1

      Go back and watch "Escape from New York" again.

    5. Re:Other uses for this tech by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jeez; why are the people here such sloppy spellers?

      Because for me it's [B][O][R][vovel not present in English, a bit similar to "i" in "bitch"][S] [YE][W][C("ts")][same vovel not present in English][N], and that IS the correct spelling, expressed in cirillic characters. I have no clue how you Americans mangle that to adapt your writing so pronouncing it according to your sick grammar rules would closest match the original pronounciation.
      The alternative is when you transcribe writing directly and then attempt to pronounce it according to your grammar rules. The mess you're making of the foreign names and words. Hopeless.

    6. Re:Other uses for this tech by jc42 · · Score: 1

      Yeah; you're right. The basic problem is that English is the only European language that hasn't had a major spelling reform in the past century or so. Our spelling is a mess, with no reliable connection between spelling and pronunciation.

      As a result, there is no good way to transliterate words and names from another alphabet into English "phonetics". English doesn't have a phonetic spelling system. Most English sounds have more than one spelling, and most of our letters have more than one pronunciation.

      In addition, Russian sounds are not the same as English. No matter how you spell a Russian word for English-speaking people, they can't get the sounds right. People try, but the only result is several different systems for transliterating Russian to English. This just confuses things more.

      It's a mess, and it will probably never be fixed. There is no language authority for English. Other languages have official organizations, usually government departments, to standardize the language and writing systems, but this has never happened with English, and probably never will. I've always felt sorry for people who have to learn English. Maybe our writing system isn't as bad as Chinese, but it's still one of the world's worst.

      It's utterly hopeless. You'll just have to accept bad transliterations of Russian words into English, and even worse mispronunciations.

      (But then, I've heard some rather weird mispronunciations of American place names from Russians, not to mention Germans and French. We just think it's cute and charming. ;-)

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  6. No need to enlarge by ReformedExCon · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Under the thumbnail picture there is an arrow pointing at the picture encouraging the reader to enlarge the photo. Maybe they ought to point an arrow back at the inventors and tell them to reduce the size of the device. It is enormous compared to any typical wearable wristwatch.

    For many years there have been watches that will track heartbeat. Runners and bicyclists have, for a long time, used these to their training advantage by tracking their physical exertion with these light, unobtrusive wristwatches. Granted, it didn't send realtime data to a server which was monitored by doctors, but it had its uses.

    I think that increasing the ability of doctors to have access to such vital information is a huge step forward if it means reducing the number of cumbersome machines surrounding the patient in the hospital. So, it would great to have patients fitted with these in the waiting room so that their metabolic status can be monitored over the course of several minutes rather than just the few seconds before the doctor sees them.

    Reduce the size and improve the styling, and you could have everyone who was concerned about their health wearing these. I'd do it, if I was so concerned.

    --
    Jesus saved me from my past. He can save you as well.
    1. Re:No need to enlarge by Infinityis · · Score: 1

      Wha...? I thought people WANTED these things to be large so people could see it. Geeks are always proud of their latest bling.

      Plus, the added weight gives some extra exercise to those with heart problems.

    2. Re:No need to enlarge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agreed, not only is this thing big and bulky, it doesn't even have the prerequisite of a calculator, useless.

      Though given the target audience of 'At Risk' patients, I guess with the watch being big and bulky, the patients would never lose it for long under one of their arm's deep folds of flab.

    3. Re:No need to enlarge by MichaelSmith · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Runners and bicyclists have, for a long time, used these to their training advantage by tracking their physical exertion with these light, unobtrusive wristwatches.

      As far as I am aware these watches use a separate sender unit attached to the wearers chest. So you have to include this in any comparison of size.

    4. Re:No need to enlarge by elgatozorbas · · Score: 1

      It is not _that_ large. Moreover it is not meant to be the most stylish watch yups want to show off, it is a monitoring device for (mostly older) people at higher risk. Taking into account it has a heart beat monitor and can measure oxygen levels, make phone calls with speakerphone, I would say they did a decent job. Don't think of it as a beefed up watch, think of it as a shrunken machine that goes ping.

    5. Re:No need to enlarge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > For many years there have been watches that will track heartbeat. Runners and bicyclists have, for a long time, used these to their training advantage by tracking their physical exertion with these light, unobtrusive wristwatches. Granted, it didn't send realtime data to a server which was monitored by doctors, but it had its uses.

      A side comment on existing products--
      I have used one of these watches for years, oddly, finding it most useful during *weightlifting* and for self-monitoring of personal reactions during driving in a fairly large metropolitan area with unruly, aggressive, unskilled drivers. Although moderately sophisticated versions of such 'watches' cost only about $100-$200, mine records hours of heartrate [only] data and transmits the file via a simple link to a PC for analysis [ usually just graphing ] using free or much more capable moderately priced software. This kind of analysis is useful for longish duration (yoga, swimming, interval spinning/cycling, crosstraining, etc) activities. These 'watches' are usually not easily distinguished by colleagues from ordinary ones and provide interesting indicators either in real time [ to the individual wearer ] or in offline analyses.
      The 'watches' receive heart pulse data from a small transmitter which is usually worn on a strap fastened around the chest/abdomen area. Perhaps this transmitter, or at least the unobtrusive strap idea, might help make the proposed more comprehensive product a little less cumbersome.

    6. Re:No need to enlarge by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 1

      I think it is probably large because it is a prototype. If they get a manufacturer to mass produce it, the Fab can do a lot to reduce size.

      Also, they probably have to hook into a users insurance because there might be liability claims since this deals with a persons health. The main limit to this device's adoption most definitely will be liability.

      --
      >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
  7. This didn't exist already? Dig the pricing. by putko · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm surprised there wasn't something similar enough already -- it sounds essential.

    I find the pricing to be the most curious: "The price will vary, Atzmon says, according to service packages and insurance coverage."

    I can understand prices varying with costs. Buy why does the "insurance coverage" matter? Shouldn't the device cost whatever it costs, regardless of what insurance someone has?

    The last time I bought something at the store, they didn't say, "oh, hey -- how much insurance do you have -- I need to know that so that I can price the bag of cereal you got."

    Sounds like some in-your-face price discrimination.

    --
    http://www.thebricktestament.com/the_law/when_to_s tone_your_children/dt21_18a.html
    1. Re:This didn't exist already? Dig the pricing. by elgatozorbas · · Score: 1

      Probably you don't just but a watch and that's it, buy you also pay a subscription to the medical staff in stand by for you, being trained to understand your watch is calling them. Maybe even depending on the guaranteed maximum time they need to get to your house etc...

    2. Re:This didn't exist already? Dig the pricing. by LS · · Score: 1

      Perhaps they referring to the end cost to the user, and not the wholesale cost.

      LS

      --
      There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
    3. Re:This didn't exist already? Dig the pricing. by putko · · Score: 1

      Of course if you get different services, you pay a different price. I wasn't arguing about that at all.

      They say the price will depend on what sort of insurance you have.

      Whatever kind of insurance I have (or don't have) has no reasonable relationship to the price they'd charge for the device.

      If I got bought a tube of toothpaste (with delivery), where I live would matter (e.g. NYC vs Lagos, NIgeria). But how much my house is worth, how much insurance I have, how much money is in my wallet and the color of my hair wouldn't have any direct relation to the price.

      I suggest you read the article again and think about how odious this is.

      --
      http://www.thebricktestament.com/the_law/when_to_s tone_your_children/dt21_18a.html
    4. Re:This didn't exist already? Dig the pricing. by putko · · Score: 0

      Dude, WTF does what insurance I have have to do with what price they charge me for something?

      If I have insurance, that's between me an my insurer, not me, the insurer and the watchmaker.

      Maybe my moms is my insurer, in the sense that she'll bail me out.

      It sucks if these watch makers want to charge me more/less just because my mommy is willing to back me up, and your mommy isn't able to, or Rodney Richpigge has gold-plated insurance, so they charge him an arm and a leg.

      --
      http://www.thebricktestament.com/the_law/when_to_s tone_your_children/dt21_18a.html
    5. Re:This didn't exist already? Dig the pricing. by Ihlosi · · Score: 1
      I find the pricing to be the most curious: "The price will vary, Atzmon says, according to service packages and insurance coverage."



      Depending on the country you're, the price for medical services will depend quite heavily on the type of health insurance you have, so this isn't anything new.

    6. Re:This didn't exist already? Dig the pricing. by CornerScribe · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm not positive, but I think whether you have insurance (and the quality of insurance) can affect the prices of certain things.

      For example, I think that people without insurance get charged more for prescriptions than those with insurance do (even taking into account the insurance payments). So, if I have insurance, the total cost of a particular drug might be $40, yet someone without insurance might pay more than that.

      It seems terribly unfair (and is unfair, IMO), but big insurance companies can negotiate discounts that individuals can't get. I'm betting that something similar might be happening here as well.

      Here's a link that give a few details. http://www.medicoverage.com/more/A35_0_1_0_M/
      --
      Visit my serial fiction site at www.cornerscribe.com
    7. Re:This didn't exist already? Dig the pricing. by ctr2sprt · · Score: 1
      I can understand prices varying with costs. Buy why does the "insurance coverage" matter? Shouldn't the device cost whatever it costs, regardless of what insurance someone has?
      Should, but doesn't. If you have good insurance, doctors will always charge the maximum allowed. If you don't, often they will charge substantially less. The actual cost of the device (to the doctor) falls somewhere in between; the idea is that insured patients help subsidize the uninsured.

      Probably not all doctors do this, and certainly not all to the same degree, but it is fairly common. Note that it does not apply to hospitals.

    8. Re:This didn't exist already? Dig the pricing. by wfberg · · Score: 1


      Dude, WTF does what insurance I have have to do with what price they charge me for something?

      If I have insurance, that's between me an my insurer, not me, the insurer and the watchmaker.


      Some plans will refund the entire cost, some only in part. End-result; different amount of money out-of-pocket to the end-user (since you'd have paid the insurance premiums anyway).

      Some plans (e.g. in the US: HMOs) don't refund your costs, but give you a certain level of healthcare; some of which will be fully covered, some of which you'll be billed for additional to your premiums.

      Some insurers may, as a service, buy stuff like this in bulk, acting as a wholesaler on their clients' behalves, passing along the savings (or a part thereof). (Also, some big HMOs will get discounts from the manufacturer).

      Some countries (you're not alone in the world) will have different regulatory regimes, increasing the price (more testing to be done due to stricter rules; restricting the demand by allowing it only for certain conditions, exclusion from basic plans) or decreasing it (subsidies, more relaxed testing compared to FDA allowing it to be marketed abroad earlier than in the US, broader allowed prescriptions, mandatory price-caps).

      Have you ever bought health insurance? Have you read the booklet with all the terms and conditions, the schedules of what they do and donot refund, hospitals and doctors that are contracted, etc? You should.

      --
      SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    9. Re:This didn't exist already? Dig the pricing. by putko · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I've bought insurance and read the booklet.

      Price Discrimination is illegal (in the US) according to the Robinson-Patman act. What Atzmon said sounded like price discrimination to me. Just read up on the Robinson-Patman act if you want more info.

      It seems others interpret what the guy said as, "the cost out of your pocket will depend on what insurance you've got," which is pretty silly. When press releases talk prices, it is normally to annouce what something will cost, not to declare that when it is time to buy the thing, you will begin haggling as if in a bazaar.

      --
      http://www.thebricktestament.com/the_law/when_to_s tone_your_children/dt21_18a.html
    10. Re:This didn't exist already? Dig the pricing. by hotdiggitydawg · · Score: 1

      I'm surprised there wasn't something similar enough already

      There was, and still is. An example. The only difference is that you don't need a separate cellphone.

      This article is just another slashvertisement.

    11. Re:This didn't exist already? Dig the pricing. by cjb-nc · · Score: 1

      Heh, welcome to the wonderful world of medical insurance.

      My wife went in for "medically necessary" surgery last fall. She wanted to choose a doctor that was renowned in the field, even though he wasn't in the preferred network for her insurance plan. It came down to the insurance would cover the hospital bills (hospital was in plan) but not the surgeon's fee. We decided to go ahead and pay the surgeon's fee out of pocket.

      When it came time to talk billing, the surgeon's office told us up front: the fee is $8k. Unless your insurance will be paying, then the fee is $11k. And oh, by the way, even if he were in network, the "reasonable" fee the insurance would pay was only $2k, tops, and we were responsible for the difference. So basically, by paying ourselves it was $8k, or by claiming insurance we'd have paid $9k!

    12. Re:This didn't exist already? Dig the pricing. by grasshoppa · · Score: 1

      I find the pricing to be the most curious: "The price will vary, Atzmon says, according to service packages and insurance coverage."

      You don't even know the half of it.

      I work at a dental office. Several of them in fact. We are forced to charge our patients different based on who their insurance carrier is.

      Just think on that a moment.

      We have 10k+ patients. And there are unique insurance plans for just about every family. Fortunately, there are only about 20 fee schedules we have to keep track of. However, my point is, a root canal is ~400 bucks normally. However, under Delta I think it's 350. Under Etna it's 600, blah blah blah. And we are contractually obligated to charge these prices for these procedures.

      So no, that the watch would cost differently based on who your provider is makes perfect sense to someone in the industry. And yes, we all know it's fucked up, but that's the insurance industry for you.

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
    13. Re:This didn't exist already? Dig the pricing. by dr_canak · · Score: 1

      "When it came time to talk billing, the surgeon's office told us up front: the fee is $8k. Unless your insurance will be paying, then the fee is $11k. And oh, by the way, even if he were in network, the "reasonable" fee the insurance would pay was only $2k, tops, and we were responsible for the difference. So basically, by paying ourselves it was $8k, or by claiming insurance we'd have paid $9k!"

      I'm sure the issue here is the processing cost and lost future earnings to the hospital for billing an insurance company. It is exceedingly time consuming and labor intensive, even with sophisticated computer record/billing systems, to get a charge out the door to an insurance agency. Clerks pour through and collect all the relevant billing info, then crank it through expensive software that will generate a billing report that may or may not be accepted by the insurer in question. And what is required can vary from insurer to insurer, plan to plan.

      Then, there is the delay from the time a patient walks out the door to the time a check arrives in the mail paying for that care. Those care costs are upfront. The reimbursement can easily be months off. So, that is essentially lost revenue on investment income.

      And finally, there is the denial of a claim (or part of a claim), which further bogs the process down as well.

      It is far from a perfect system with no real answers at this point (baring some radical switch to social medicine), but it's not like the hospital is trying to make more money by having you make a claim. It is by far in the hospital's interest to have more patient's like yourself, who are willing to simply pay out of pocket for their care. It is infinitely easier, far less time consuming and troublesome, and likely more profitable.

      As an aside, it's why we're begining to see a cottage industry of "private physicians." Doctors who don't want the hassle of insurance anymore and contract directly with patients to provide care for a set amount each year. It ain't cheap, but there are plenty of wealthy people in this country who are opting for it. And it can be *far* more profitable for the physician, assuming (s)he are established and have the infrastructure in place to provide primary or specialty care.

      jeff

    14. Re:This didn't exist already? Dig the pricing. by pete6677 · · Score: 1

      Doctors play a game with the insurance companies. The doctor bills as high as possible and the insurance pays as little as possible. Supposedly, doctors contract with the insurance carriers to accept a certain fee, but this amount can still vary. In theory, the insurance company could pay them $1 per visit, but they don't because the doctor wouldn't take their patients anymore if they did. Special arrangements, designed to make medical care cheaper, actually make it much more complex and expensive.

    15. Re:This didn't exist already? Dig the pricing. by irtza · · Score: 1
      from what I have read of the act here, here and for a quick note here this act has mainly to do with protect competition. One, most doctors who will be doing the actual billing to the patient, are not interstate corporations and are thus not affected. (Well at least by my interpretation)

      Second, the variation in pricing has to do with contracts between doctors and the insurance. As in the insurance will say that we will not pay more than X dollars for this product or this service and this number will varry by insurance. In order to bill the insurance the doctor must agree to these terms or not bill the insurance. Any doctor is free to do that but would then have to charge a patient directly and would thus lose out on potential business. This drop can be far greater the larger the insurance group, so large insurance groups can force doctors to lower their pricing.

      Some doctors opt not to do this, so they will not be listed in the insurances directory. They will then be free to charge as they see fit. Also, doctors can form groups and thus gain levarage over insurance companies for billing purposes. If members of a certain specialty in an area belong to a select number of groups, the insurance companies may pay higher prices or risk not having enough qualified physicians to service those they are covering.

      btw, if you find this disturbing just think of this. In medicine, you often pay for procedures that fail. Could you imagine going to Lexus and them saying only 2 out of 5 cars will actually drive, but you can not test drive the cars and once purchased, there are no refunds, but they can service your new car for additional costs. That essentially happens with many services in medicine (although a big difference is that in medicine, not getting a procedure may be more detrimental than the 40% chance of failure)... anyway, just wanted to say that the medicine world really does operate by a seperate set of rules that may not be fair, but are not easily comparable to say just purchasing a watch (and you would not be purchasing this watch without good medical indication unless you like wasting money).

      --
      When all else fails, try.
    16. Re:This didn't exist already? Dig the pricing. by Paisley+Phrog · · Score: 1

      No, this is how home monitoring systems work.

      I work at a print shop that does a lot of work for a current home monitoring system. Systems like these aren't sold at Walgreens; they're sold by prescription, with a doctor recommending its use in conjuction with some kind of care service (typically a Visiting Nurse Association sort of thing). Your insurance has huge bearings on what kind of treatments are applicable, and how much will be covered. There's nothing "odious" about it.

    17. Re:This didn't exist already? Dig the pricing. by dr_canak · · Score: 1

      While i don't know that your comment follows from the parent post or my own, in few cases is it the actual physicians conspiring with insurance carriers. It's the facilities that employ those physicians that set the rates, not the physicians themselves.

      Physicians want to and make good money, don't get me wrong. And i'm not exactly sympathetic to their efforts when the believe they are being short changed. But health care provision is big business with substantial profits. While some physicians may be part of management or sit on the board of directors, these are business folks calling the shots, setting the rates, setting reimbursement rates etc... For once, physicians are like the rest of us poor schlubs, working for the man ;-). It's new territory for them and they don't like kicking up their earnings to management.

      Back in the day when everyone had a private insurer and saw a private physician, then yes the physician had to set a competitive rate for care to be on the insurance panel. But anymore, there are few physicians who practice independently. It's just too damn hard and expensive.

      jeff

    18. Re:This didn't exist already? Dig the pricing. by LS · · Score: 1

      Before you flip out again, as the other posters have explained, it's not the manufacturerthat is affecting the price, so they aren't discriminating against anyone. Some insurance companies pay more or less for various medical treatments, affecting the price for the end user. If you have a better plan, you may pay less. If you have a terrible plan, you may pay the whole price. It's not the manufacturer...

      --
      There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
  8. As predicted by... by dj245 · · Score: 1
    --
    Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
  9. Warning_ Bad Joke Ahead by rooijan · · Score: 4, Funny

    So, I assume this device will be watching these patients vital signs?

    I'm sorry, I couldn't help myself...

    --
    Daar is nie 'n lepel nie
    1. Re:Warning_ Bad Joke Ahead by JumperCable · · Score: 0

      Que the Tin Foil Hat Brigade.

  10. Feature request by mrjb · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It already has all these neat features in it including a clock (otherwise how would it measure pulse?). I wonder if this device also show the time of day on its display? That would free the wearer from needing to wear 2 'watches'. The built-in phone is kinda neat though... all we need now is a fully automated, bullet proof car to go with it.

    --
    Visit http://ringbreak.dnd.utwente.nl/~mrjb/growingbettersoftware to download your free copy of the book
    1. Re:Feature request by Chosen+Reject · · Score: 1
      --
      Stop Global Warming!
      Just say no to irreversible processes!
  11. Finally... by Maavin · · Score: 2, Funny

    Damn, Mike, finally your damn watch stopped beeping, that was soo annoying...

    *cough* *wheeze*

    Um... Mike?!

    --


    Crivens! I kicked meself in me own heid!
  12. Built in cell phone by Antony-Kyre · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Didn't we have a story about cell phones and permanent eye damage days ago? Can't help but wonder if there are potential risks with this kind of stuff.

    1. Re:Built in cell phone by Vo0k · · Score: 1

      Yeah, thanks to this device every time you have heart attack, your sight gets slightly worse. At 10.000th heart attack you go completely blind.

      --
      Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
    2. Re:Built in cell phone by Antony-Kyre · · Score: 1

      The reward probably outweighs the risk of using it, but I was being serious though. That the fact cell phone useage can cause permanent eye damage should raise some concerns.

  13. Fap Fap Fap... by ferrellcat · · Score: 2, Funny

    Doctor, the sensors are going haywire. Send an ambulance!

  14. Warning... Worse Joke Ahead by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, it will monitor those patients vital signs, and phone in that data to the hospital servers.

    rofl

  15. It'd be nice... by Infinityis · · Score: 1

    It would be really cool if this thing adjusted the flow of time to match your heartbeat. That way, when you're relaxed, time goes by real slow and you can enjoy it. But when you're in a frenzy and your heart's going at 300 bpms, you move much faster relative to everyone else.

    Welcome to the Matrix.

    1. Re:It'd be nice... by lotrfan7007 · · Score: 1

      So its been discovered...The way that Neo does bullet time is through sneezing to stop his heart, theirfore stopping time at the same time!

      --
      To be or not to be: There is no maybe.
  16. hmm using ... by Tracer_Bullet82 · · Score: 1

    technology to play nanny..

    Where I have I heard that before..

    I'm sure the result would be alright.

    --


    Timang tinggi tinggi
    parang sudah asah
    alang alang mandi
    biar sampai basah
  17. yeah, but... by maxpublic · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...does it change colors like a mood ring?

    Max

    --
    My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
  18. Fully Featured? by bumptehjambox · · Score: 1

    The article doesn't say if it tells time or not. I wonder if you have to wear that gigantic thing AND a watch.

  19. Too little sleep, too little caffee. by Vo0k · · Score: 2, Informative

    I read this as watch like device at risk from patents. I thought some asshole patented wearing anything other than handwatch around your wrist. Seemed damn likely.

    Back to the subject: In Europe it should work. But in the US, with the cellular coverage you have there, in most cases it will just help confirming cause of death, because the base station will be just out of range. You guys NEED to do something with your cellular services. Coverage of whole country, just for cases like these is essential. In Europe, even in backwater countries of former eastern bloc, there's very few places "out of range" left and sometimes even in good coverage area new base stations are built, just to improve reliablity, quality, add redundancy in case of failure. In an average small town, field engineering options of your phone will detect 3-4 stations within usable range, 4 others with too weak signal to use. You can go by train and just watch switching the base stations. And the idea to install GPS in cellular phones to help locating them? Ridiculous! There are already services of "locate self", "locate friend" available, because by pinging 3 nearest stations and processing the distance readouts, the cell phone can be located with precision of some 20 meters. Now how useful would it be to locate the patient in emergency?

    --
    Anagram("United States of America") == "Dine out, taste a Mac, fries"
    1. Re:Too little sleep, too little caffee. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must not be in the same Europe that I am, my cellular coverage sucks! I don't get service in my apartment, hell, I didn't get coverage in large parts of Nuremberg. Last time I checked that was a major city. Meanwhile, while I was in the US, I was out in some pretty remote areas and still had cell phone coverage, it just depends on your carrier(I used Verizon). Not to friggin' mention that it cost me 5x as much to call a cell phone in Germany FROM MY HOME PHONE than it is for me to call the US.

      This reality distortion field with cell phones has got to end. You can claim that it works all over Europe, but the truth is it doesn't. Coverage here is as spotty as it is in the US. Given the choice, I would take the US system over the European one in a heartbeat.

    2. Re:Too little sleep, too little caffee. by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1
      You guys NEED to do something with your cellular services.

      Since when did mobile phone coverage become a basic human right? What would you say about Africa? well yeah there is a food problem but first lets fix the mobile phone system

      I am in Australia where phone coverage is much worse than the USA. But the reason is just population density. More people, more money for infrastructure.

      Maybe the European designers of GSM should not have built in a maximum 35km range for each cell. That would help.

    3. Re:Too little sleep, too little caffee. by wfberg · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You must not be in the same Europe that I am, my cellular coverage sucks! I don't get service in my apartment, hell, I didn't get coverage in large parts of Nuremberg. Last time I checked that was a major city. Meanwhile, while I was in the US, I was out in some pretty remote areas and still had cell phone coverage, it just depends on your carrier(I used Verizon).


      When were you in Germany? It must have been a while back, as these days Eastern Germany is no longer Communist, and as a result they have more than one carrier (shock, horror). E-plus, O2, T-mobile and Vodafone. coverage maps. BTW, remote areas usually have a lot less concrete in them than inner cities, so you're bound to have better coverage for an equal amount of base stations.

      And unlike in the US, they all use GSM, so you can use the same phone on any network, just switch out a SIM. T-mobile and Vodafone will have the best coverage, but are also the most expensive options.


      Not to friggin' mention that it cost me 5x as much to call a cell phone in Germany FROM MY HOME PHONE than it is for me to call the US.


      Which only goes to show that the tightly regulated local loop monopoly is forced by regulators to compete better than the mobile networks with their oligopoly. Yay for regulation. Of which the US is surely a shining example (NOT).


      This reality distortion field with cell phones has got to end. You can claim that it works all over Europe, but the truth is it doesn't. Coverage here is as spotty as it is in the US. Given the choice, I would take the US system over the European one in a heartbeat.

      Take it, we don't want it.

      --
      SCO employee? Check out the bounty
    4. Re:Too little sleep, too little caffee. by VJ42 · · Score: 0

      First, your link is broken, but with the help of google, you're absolutley right, with the execption of O2 the other carrier have blanket coverage of Germany: http://www.gsmworld.com/roaming/gsminfo/cou_de.sht ml
      and some other countries: http://www.gsmworld.com/roaming/gsminfo/index.shtm l

      --
      If I have nothing to hide, you have no reason to search me
    5. Re:Too little sleep, too little caffee. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am the AC you were responding to, and THANK YOU FOR PROVING MY POINT! It was ever so kind!

      Notice in the parent post it says, "You must not be in the same Europe that I am, am=in Europe right now. Right now I don't get cell service where I live(in Bavaria, ie not part of former East Germany). The trip to Nuremberg where I didn't get service was a month ago.....

      It costs me about 25 euro cents to call a cell phone in Germany from my home phone, IN GERMANY!(read the original post before going off on your little rants next time, k?) It costs me about 5 eurocents a minute to call a cell phone in the US?I don't even want to go into what it costs to call from a cell phone to another cell phone. In the US, I can get a contract free pre-paid phone that only costs me 10 cents a minute to call to another cell phone across the country. I don't see any European carrier even coming close.

      I know you must constantly insist that everything Europe has is better, but this time it's not.

      Ironic that a lot of Europeans criticize Americans for being ignorant about world affairs, and yet you don't know what you are talking about, but you are critical anyway. All you know is: "Anti-American=good, truth be damned!"

      I have lived in Germany, Japan, and the US, and you know which cell system I liked the best? The US by a longshot. I guess that makes me a dumb slave for choosing what services I want rather than going with what is ideologically popular.

    6. Re:Too little sleep, too little caffee. by Ihlosi · · Score: 1
      It costs me about 5 eurocents a minute to call a cell phone in the US?



      It costs you 5 cents, but how much does it cost the person whose cellphone you're calling ? It's their minutes being used up.

    7. Re:Too little sleep, too little caffee. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If they have a monthly plan, which a lot of Americans do, it's quite cheap. If I call on a weekend(most likely) it costs them nothing, if I call in the evening(with the time zone difference, not very likely) it costs them nothing. If I call during any other time, most plans in the US give 400 minutes per month free, so it costs them very little. Even when you go over the limit(which is hard to do), it only costs about 30-40 cents a minute. If they do pre-paid, you can find pre-paid for about 10-15 cents a minute if you look hard enough. In America, it's quite common for many people(myself included) to completely forgo a land line and just go with a cellular phone. Such a thing is just not feasible economically in Europe. I didn't really want a landline, but I had to get one because a)I get no service at home and b)it's too expensive.

      I'm not a Europe basher, there are a lot of things that I like here compared to the US, but the cell system just isn't one of them.

    8. Re:Too little sleep, too little caffee. by Vitriol+Angst · · Score: 1

      Since England is about the size of one of our medium to small states, it is hard to blanket every acre with a cell-phone tower.

      A warning transmission could be sent with "burst mode" from a watch like this anywhere in North America. I was knew this gentleman who was trying to patent a similar watch for boats. It used a range finder to sound an alarm if someone was too far from the receiver (overboard). The watch itself used a standard battery, but a capacitor could be charged to send a burst signal to satellite every 15 minutes from just about anywhere in the world.

      Since that was 20 years ago, I'm sure we could do better. I would be surprised if this device doesn't have some way of getting around the 2 mile cell tower issue in case of emergency. If not, it would be much easier to add than 500,000 more cell phone towers to the country.

      Besides, the range and technology of cell phones should improve a lot. So investing so heavily in a cell phone infrastructure is short-sighted. Personally, I am a big proponent of infrastructure that helps everyone--but you have to pick and choose wisely. I'd much rather have high-speed trains everywhere.

      --
      >>"ad space available -- low rates!!!"
  20. Tech not being implemented by caregivers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's always limitations.

    When I bought my phone, they advertised 'enhanced 911' which would tell dispatchers your location... apparently the dispatchers aren't set up to receive that info.. so they still have to ask you where you are.

    Your watch can transmit info.. but if the system is flaky, or they get 100 'heart attacks' a night false alarms, they'll be ignoring your silly tech toy, assuming they're even set up to receive it's silly broadcasts.

  21. No, no, no! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's a wrong question! The right question is:
    But does it run Linux?

    1. Re:No, no, no! by DohnJoe · · Score: 0

      no, no, that's outdated already. You should ask if it runs OSX now...

  22. Oh No, Not Again! by Emporerx · · Score: 1

    Did anyone else here get a terrible vision of that old Medic Alert commercial where the old lady says so dramatically, "I've fallen, and I can't get up!"?

    Maybe that's just me.

    1. Re:Oh No, Not Again! by Punboy · · Score: 1

      Oh great. I had FINALLY gotten that horrid commercial out of my head, and here you go reminding me of it. :-p

      --
      If you like what I've said here, and want to read more, go to http://www.krillrblog.com
  23. Get the grammar right, FFS!!!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Had the headline said "Watch-like device" then it would have made sense instantly.

    "Watch like device" is just plain wrong. I know; I'm expecting too much from Slashdot.

    1. Re:Get the grammar right, FFS!!!!!!!! by DigitalDame2 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I was the one who submitted the article, and I actually wrote the headline as "Wrist Watch-like device..." because I didn't want people to get confused, but they didn't post it like that. Oh well!! Very glad so many people had such interesting comments toward the article though!

  24. When I worked as a PM for special system upgrades in public facilities, E911 was all the rage. The problem is that for E911 to work, not only must your system be able to handle it, the 911 dispatcher must be able to handle it.

    More often then not,
    1. The local dispatcher has the capibilities to use E911, but their systems don't have your specifics, so it's moot
    2. The local dispatcher has the capibilities to use E911, but the humans there haven't been trained how to use it, so it's moot
    3. The local dispatcher doesn't have any ability to use E911. While your phone or phone system is set up for it, they can't take advantage of, so it's moot.

    Ultimatly, E911 could be something really cool (and helpful), but from what I saw, it's more of a marketing buzzword then anything else.

    --
    The Internet is generally stupid
    1. Re:E911 by jc42 · · Score: 1

      All very true, and this illustrates why such a gadget shouldn't deal with a voice system like E911. Its comm stuff should do wireless IP, the software should connect directly to your hospital's computers, and the computers can notify whoever needs to be notified.

      We've had a lot of discussion about how hopeless the wi-fi system is for giving coverage. But my pocket "smartphone" now has full-time, always-on IP connectivity, and the cell-phone system has much better coverage than wi-fi ever can.

      Perhaps such medical monitors can be the excuse we need to implement universal wireless net access. And maybe force the recalcitrant comm companies to implement deals that will make everyone's monitor work regardless of which comm company provides service at each remote location, without first requiring minutes to negotiate yet another $10/day "contract" because the service is via a different company than the relay in the previous block.

      And, once we've got that, we can include a tiny microphone and speaker, and use VoIP to add "phone calls" as a feature. And we can look forward to the day when young people have no clue what a "phone" used to be or why we use such a word with our pocket/wrist comm/audio/video gadget, whatever it's called by then.

      We could be doing all this now, y'know.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  25. What about diabetes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is there any competitor for GlucoWatch, which is quite expensive and not that precise? I would be particularry interested in any device like this that would help to monitor the diabetes. Thanks

    1. Re:What about diabetes? by Ihlosi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I would assume there is not.

      Noninvasive, accurate blood glucose measurement is one of the "holy grails" of biomedical engineering. The first company to come up with a technical solution and the associated patents will basically have a license to print money for the next 20 years.

  26. Yeah, but.... by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 1

    This is all cool, but you know what would be really neat? If you had some device that you wore on your wrist that told you the time. More advanced applications could include the date.

    Now, something like that... I'd pay for.

    --
    The Internet is generally stupid
    1. Re:Yeah, but.... by jc42 · · Score: 1

      some device that you wore on your wrist that told you the time. More advanced applications could include the date.

      Heh. I had a device like that several years ago.

      One day, during a spell of hot weather, I noticed that I'd developed a minor rash under it, so I didn't wear it for a couple of weeks, until the rash went away.

      Then I noticed that I hadn't missed that wrist display. It seems that in the places I hang out, it's nearly impossible to be out of sight of a time display. If I'm out walking in the woods, well, I have a cell phone in my pocket, and it has a time display. So why carry one around on my wrist?

      I haven't missed it.

      I've also read that the sale of wrist watches has been declining in the US and Europe for the past 5-10 years. It seems that a lot of people have been reasoning the same way.

      OTOH, a compact Dick-Tracy-style wrist communicator could revive the market. Especially if it included a basic health monitor that could display some exercise-related data like heart rate. It's easy enough for such a gadget to display time and date by default.

      A couple of years back, I read of a compact wrist cell phone that was being sold in Japan. I wonder what ever happened to it?

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
  27. The $64Million question... by Viceice · · Score: 1

    "...can measure vital signs including pulse rate, cardiac rhythm (ECG or EKG), and blood oxygen levels..."

    Yes, but can it tell time?

    Sorry... just HAD to...

    --
    Sometimes I wish I was a plumber, then I'd know how to deal with other people's shit.
  28. shouldn't it be by jotux · · Score: 0

    "Watch-like", instead of "Watch like"?

  29. Way of the Future by CleverNickedName · · Score: 1

    Now and again we get a glimpse of what the future could become. I think this bulky watch is one of those glimpses.

    Imagine having all you vital signs monitored 24 hours a day. When there's a serious problem, your stats and GPS position are sent to the nearest A&E.
    We'd wonder how we ever lived without it.

    --


    Unfortunately, I am not Wil Wheaton
  30. Re:Yes, but privacy?Get Em out and working by jimmydevice · · Score: 0

    HMO's main goal is to reduce patient expenses. If you can get a patient out of the hospital and walking around where the business isn't being sucked by patient expenses, that is a good thing. If they Die, that's a problem for the insurance company, Not the HMO. All the better.
    Cheers.

  31. Price?? by jigyasubalak · · Score: 1

    I am guessing that the first edition of such
    devices are going to be prohibitively expensive.
    Yes, I have RTFA.
    Taking it a bit farther, I am guessing that,
    here in India, anyone who can afford that
    kind of a device will easily be able
    to afford to have a 24x7 nurse look after him.
    Guess what he's gonna choose?

    --
    The best planning can be done after the project completes.
  32. WTH Similar Concept by Rac3r5 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My final project in Uni (2yrs ago) was basically a watch like this. It was supposed to measure heart rate, body fat, blood sugar etc and store it in the EEPROM. This data would then be available for dl via a wireless link like blueTooth. And then ur doctor or u could check your data. I built/programmed most of the framework to interact with the sensors and store the data, and my partner wrote an app in Java which you could use to dl your data and plot/examine ur progress.

    Too bad we didn't have any business skills to pursue the idea. :(

    1. Re:WTH Similar Concept by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Your business skills had nothing to do with it. Had your device simply measured blood sugar levels continuously and accurately (sensitivity and specificity), a multitude of companies would have been knocking on your door with money in hand.

      Just look, it took a company 10 years to get this one to the public... Just don't sweat, don't get cold, and don't rely on it. Oh ya, did I mention it causes irritation and needs 3 hours of prep time before it starts giving readings? And it's one of the best out there!
      http://www.diabetesnet.com/diabetes_technology/glu cowatch.php

    2. Re:WTH Similar Concept by aak88 · · Score: 1

      Rac3r5 - Are you still in this line of dev? I have a friend who is working on a similar project and is looking for sensors soltutions. Let me know if you have more info or is this all history?

    3. Re:WTH Similar Concept by Rac3r5 · · Score: 1

      hi,

      The only place I can think of in terms of sensors, where my company buys stuff from is digiKey

      one of the challenges we faced was that we had a very small budget, so we weren't able to buy all the sensors that we needed.

      The body fat/sugar sensor that I wanted would analyze body sweat.
      For the temp sensor is used a DS1620 chip
      For the heart rate monitor, department BS prevented us from getting one in time. So I just used a capacitor circuit to simulate the heartBeats.

      When I was looking for sensors I used froogle.

      hopefully that helps.

    4. Re:WTH Similar Concept by aak88 · · Score: 1

      Thanks. I have bough from Digikey before. We are looking for a product is a set of sensors bundled into one. This product from Isreal seems cool - but I am sure it will need to be subsidised by phone companies and health care providers/insurance. It is really difficult to find good sensors that don't get in the way.

    5. Re:WTH Similar Concept by Rac3r5 · · Score: 1

      well the best way to aquire the sensors would be to figure out how they work and are made.

      at the heart of things.. most sensor data is obtained by looking at changes in voltage/current.

      I am no longer involved in this type stuff(my background is SoftEng/TelecommEng), I don't have an EE degree. I picked most of the stuff by reading manuals etc. All I do right now is program apps on PCs and microcontrollers.
      I live in Canada, so if u come across any good electronics supplier (besides digiKey let me know). I can't afford digiKey prices. :(

      Cheers :)

  33. "He's doing it again..." by red_kenotic · · Score: 1

    Privacy intrusion! Obviously not for me, I'm a geek. But for those lucky people out there that do have sex - I hope the doctors won't be giving them a call because their pulse rate suddenly went through the roof.

    Or, well, I could take up running to trick people I'm getting some every night.

  34. Score another for Arthur C Clarke! by hplasm · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Sounds like the CORA (?) device from Fountains of Paradise.

    --
    ...and he grinned, like a fox eating shit out of a wire brush.
  35. heh, I read that as by DohnJoe · · Score: 1

    while sending an alarm to a caretaker.

    Could be useful that, for the *really* sick or if the device doesn't detect life signs anymore.

  36. Cellphone = Cancer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "in the case of an emergency, transmit the information in real time using the built-in cellular phone while sending an alarm to a caregiver." "

    And it may even add an extra black blotch of cancinogen to the watch-bearers wrist! HOW CONVEEEEEEEEEEEEN-EE-YENT!

    BRO0KLYN

  37. get over yourself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    This monitors blood O2, heart rate and rhthms with the goal of saving someones life if something goes wrong. Privacy doesn't come up here at all.

  38. Re:Yes, but privacy?Get Em out and working by kfg · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Please see the post immediately prior to your own.

    This is not an HMO cost reducing issue. As far as I'm concerned if you were to confine me to a hospital for the rest of my life because of my risk factor you might just as well shoot me now and be done with it. I'd shoot myself after a few weeks anyway.

    So I'm "at risk." Big deal. We all are. Some of us just carry higher risks, like coal miners and auto commuters. I'll live until I die, just like everybody else.

    As one of my greatest risks is acquiring a respiratory infection, like a cold, ironically the one place I don't want to be is in a big building full of sick people anyway. On the whole I'm safest in a cabin out in the woods, growing my own food.

    KFG

  39. Okay, so we have the wristband... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... now how do I sign up for a Platinum Doc-Wagon Contract?

  40. A very bad idea by nanoakron · · Score: 5, Informative

    As a trainee cardiothoracic surgeon, I see patients in both the Intensive Care Unit and in the High Dependency Unit at our hospital...and I can't tell you the number of times alarms go off needlessly for such things as minor ECG changes and decreasing blood oxygen saturations.

    Causes for alarms going off:
    Patient takes a deeper breath than normal
    Patient moves
    Patient strains on the toilet
    Patient has a shower
    Patient's sensor falls off
    Patient's fingers get cold

    And any other innumerable causes for spurious alarms.

    So how do we know if a patient is really sick? Simple - look at them!

    This is precisely what can't be done with one of these remote monitoring devices - I looked into setting up a remote ECG monitoring system myself about 5 years ago but I can guarantee no cardiologist will want to be woken at 3am for false alarms.

    So either this device will cost one hell or a lot to run (may even be cheaper to book yourself a room in hospital for the rest of your life) or have the alarms so insensitive that a lot of people die before this fails.

    -Nano.

    1. Re:A very bad idea by bcwengerter · · Score: 1

      So either this device will cost one hell or a lot to run (may even be cheaper to book yourself a room in hospital for the rest of your life) or have the alarms so insensitive that a lot of people die before this fails.
      I would add to that the concern about who would set the alarm thresholds and how often they would need to be recalibrated. Conditions change over time, and settings that are applicable one day might not be so the next. An inappropriate alarm setting might cause undue anxiety to a patient who actually warrants less concern.
  41. Just another night at the Wristy Hot-line.... by Patchw0rk+F0g · · Score: 1

    "Crothers? Yeah, it's Hotchkins. Listen, old man Bumbles got access to his bank account again... I don't know how... yeah, they're going right off the charts again. I hope it's not that red-head again. She almost did him in that last time. What?... Hold on... no, the front gate is open... I don't know, gimme a second... Hold on, I can't tell from this monito-- wait, yeah. The dog's missing too. Better wire it up and get over there. Whoa! [multiple beeps, whistles, bangs, other Dr. Who sounds] Get a move on, Crothers! I just got an alarm from one of the out-buildings! I think he's loose! Holy mother of holies, LOOK at those readings! I didn't think he had that much blood in his body! Crothers, get your ass over there, unless you want to answer for a gross of mutilated livestock! NOOOOOOW!!!!!!"

    --
    When the going gets weird, the weird turn pro. ~~ Hunter S. Thompson
  42. ObComic Book Guy quote by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Ooh, your powers of deduction are exceptional. I can't allow you to waste them here when there are so many crimes going unsolved at this very moment. Go, go, for the good of the city.

  43. Bomb Trigger? by Bones3D_mac · · Score: 1

    I could see this thing being used by someone to set off a bomb (or other weapon) in the event they are killed. Imagine putting something like this on a soldier in the battlefield with a high-yield explosive attacked to it. Instant suicide bombers without the need to be suicidal.

    Not only could this be used for weapons, it could also be used as a "clean up" trigger. Set up a computer to eliminate any incriminating evidence you might have or transfer laege sums of money to another location before it can be seized by the state or living relatives.

    --


    8==8 Bones 8==8
    1. Re:Bomb Trigger? by vidarh · · Score: 1
      Imagine putting something like this on a soldier in the battlefield with a high-yield explosive attacked to it.

      Great. Now all the enemy has to do is target one soldier, and they create a huge explosion as surrounding soliders die and their explosives go off.

      But for suicide bombers working alone it would be great, and would be trivial to build from off the shelf components (complete with audible alarms that could trivially be co-opted as triggers - just to pick the first ad I saw when searching).

  44. Cell messages (Gauntlet Style) by Niban · · Score: 1

    If I had designd the thing. The phone in would leave one of the following messages.

    "Patient needs Food", "Patient is dying"

    Uh. if you don't get the joke, go pick up a copy of MAME or something.

    Many...many quarters.

  45. Coffin dodgers! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How much will this cost compared to the Rs 34 for a hepatitis B vaccine?

  46. Could be perfect for sports... by jesterpilot · · Score: 1

    This device could be amazing for training. It gives data normal HBM's can't measure, like oxygen levels. One could train much more effectively, and also monitor oneself during races or record attempts.

    Since sporting gear is a big market, it could bring the price of the device down to a few hundred dollars.

    Maybe the fastest man on earth will have some troubles with actually looking on his watch during a race...

    --
    Trust me, I work for the government.
    1. Re:Could be perfect for sports... by Ihlosi · · Score: 1
      This device could be amazing for training. It gives data normal HBM's can't measure, like oxygen levels. One could train much more effectively, and also monitor oneself during races or record attempts.



      Not really. It's extremely hard to make your blood oxygen saturation drop below 95% or so due to the way the breathing reflex is wired in the brain. In a non-medical situation, the device would just show some number between 95% and 100%, which basically has zero significance.

    2. Re:Could be perfect for sports... by jesterpilot · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't be so sure about it. Combined with data from (variation in) heartbeat, it might give really significant info. It's really amazing what information about your health and condition those guys from Polar can get out of just an 150 euro HB monitor. Give'm more parameters, some athletes to test and enough time to research it, and they will show up with a device which can significantly improve the performance of a dedicated athlete. Remember, just one minute on a complete Tour de France or ten meters in a one-hour timetrial is worth a fucking lot of research.

      --
      Trust me, I work for the government.
  47. And the pitfall is: by kilodelta · · Score: 1

    This has the old "If a tree falls in the woods and nobody is around to hear/see it, did it make a sound?" written all over it.

    Who exactly would suit be filed against if in the event of a life threatening cardiac event, the cell network was too congested to let a call through.

    Why not just put a hat on the person with red and blue LED's that spell out "I'm screwed" in that event.

    1. Re:And the pitfall is: by WillyMF1 · · Score: 1
      Who exactly would suit be filed against if in the event of a life threatening cardiac event, the cell network was too congested to let a call through.

      Heh, most people would wonder if it waterproof. Here on slashdot....

  48. Monitor to track moderate illness by lbya · · Score: 1

    A smaller, lower-tech version of this watch could also be useful.

    I've got moderate asthma, and choosing the best prophylactic drug depends on knowing my overall trend over several weeks or months (i.e. at a checkup, a doctor can't know what's the best medicine for me or how I'm really doing, just by listening to my breathing at that moment).

    At least for me it's not that easy to keep track of trends like that, for example I forget if I was wheezing a little yesterday morning or how many times I took my rescue inhaler last week or during the past month. I'm sure the information I tell my doctor, is not very accurate. I suspect I tend to be too optimistic, and as a result end up using a too-weak prophylactic medicine and consequently slightly over-using the rescue inhaler.

    It would be great to have a device that made recording day-to-day data about my health, as easy as using the rescue inhaler itself. A solution would a chip in the inhaler, but that might not be economical. Something like a small wristwatch with very easy-to-use data-logging software would be reusable and more versatile, and would be useful for other people's health issues besides asthma.

    Sure you can write it down, but when each event is small and they only become meaningful in aggregate, it's easy to not do it.

    What do other people do to keep track of long-term trends in their lives, that are difficult to memorize?

  49. Insurance in case the watch fails? by tintub · · Score: 1
    If it fails and you have a heart attack that could have been avoided if it didn't fail, you'd want more than your money back for the watch. Perhaps they by default they give you say, $2000 in this situation, but if you pay for an extra insurance package, they pay more?

    Disclaimer: I haven't RTFA

    --
    sig under construction...
  50. patents != patients by Xtravar · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Wow, it took me awhile to realize this wasn't a story about patents. I'm so used to seeing patent stories!

    --
    Buckle your ROFL belt, we're in for some LOLs.
  51. Almost read it wrong by Sierpinski · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I must admit when I first read this headline, I thought it said:

    Watch Like Device for At-Risk Patents

    My first thought was "You mean Microsoft can't patent the act of breathing? Maybe they'll try to patent this patent-watching device..."

    Big difference than the actual headline, so I thought I'd post.

  52. Technology can be used by the bad guys, too by linzeal · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It would also be a great device for terrorists as I commented on my blog earlier with a much less sophisticated device. With this a terror cell could destroy themselves and their homes or other locations at the same time, reducing the chance that the police would have time to shut down the cell networks.

  53. Great idea! by hacker · · Score: 1

    Why not just mandate that every person in the US wear one? I mean, Health Care companies need to protect their assets too, right?.

    In fact, it would be great if it included the full biological and medical history of the wearer, and maybe even their credit history too.

    It might be more fashionable if we wear these on our ankles though, I mean these barbed-wire fences are probably going to snag the watch as we try to climb over them to get outside our borders anyway, right?

  54. Crime victims too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    May help crime victims too. Heart rate goes up etc. in dangerous situations. Probably you gotta remember to turn it off before jogging unless there's a known EKG difference or gradual pulse rate increase that can be used to distinguish the two.

    1. Re:Crime victims too by FLEB · · Score: 1

      Or it could have... you know... a button on it.

      --
      Information wants to be free.
      Entertainment wants to be paid.
      You just want to be cheap.
  55. i'm rich i patented this by acadia11 · · Score: 1

    Man, I came up with this idea while in college, to bad, no one at the d*mn med school would listen to me, 5 years later, some other lame guy is going to get rich.

  56. Price is affected by insurance by Renraku · · Score: 1

    It can go either way.

    Needed a doctor's visit for severe nausea. Some kind of food poisoning or something. My mom got it too. We both went to the doctor. Both got the same medication. Same doctor.

    Difference? She, with insurance, came to a total of $100. She only had to pay like $20, and insurance covered the other $80.

    Me, without insurance, had to pay $250. Same visit, same doctor, same medication.

    --
    Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
  57. Watch-like! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You used the hyphen for "at-risk," why not use it properly one more time!

    Otherwise, what is a "like" device, and why am I supposed to be watching it???

  58. Ecg without additional electrodes ? by Ihlosi · · Score: 1

    I wonder how that's supposed to work. Last thing I heard was the ECG signal is the difference in electrical potential beween two points on the body.

  59. Commercial by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Help, I've flatlined, and I can't get up!

  60. This isn't even vapor-ware... by ElitistWhiner · · Score: 1

    The image is just a CAD mockup, guys. The technology has been going through patent pending proceedings but there is no working product in trial. Only venture capital monies and a couple CAD drawings. I can't believe you guys are scraping vaporware for /.

  61. Unpatentable? by bigattichouse · · Score: 1

    Prior art? See Aliens.

    --
    meh
    1. Re:Unpatentable? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also see Journey to the Far Side of the Sun, aka Doppelganger, by Gerry Anderson (circa 1968) for a wristband cardiac warning system.

  62. At Risk Patents ? by kabz · · Score: 1

    Did anyone else read this as 'at risk patents' ?

    I figured it might be some kind of Dick Tracy like device for warning engineers that something they'd designed was about to be ruined by someone elses patent.

    Maybe Apple could design and market this device (the iPWatch), and Microsoft could sneak in and patent it ... ;-)

    --
    -- "It's not stalking if you're married!" My Wife.
  63. Military Applications by MrCopilot · · Score: 1
    Hmmm, Health monitoring Location aware. Sounds like a no brainer.

    Ok, send the squad in, 8 blips in the green.....7 blips peaking heart rate.. air cover now,now ... 6 blips. Pull those men out.
    Mark location of 2 down soldiers for pickup.

    Course you have to seriously encrypt the blips.

    Not so far fetched. According to Siemens (they make the GPRS radio chips) http://communications.siemens.com/cds/frontdoor/0, 2241,hq_en_0_110776_rArNrNrNrN,00.html, the "watch" is to be manufactured by Tadiran a well know military equipment supplier based in Isreal. http://www.tadspec.com/home.php.

    Is that like partially owned by Iran? Tad-Iran?

    --
    OSGGFG - Open Source Gamers Guide to Free Games
    1. Re:Military Applications by MrCopilot · · Score: 1
      --
      OSGGFG - Open Source Gamers Guide to Free Games
  64. Capacity for Stupidity? by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 1

    I first read the title, and thought it read PATENTS, not patients!

    --
    "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
    Never been known to fail..."
  65. Does anyone else feel the same... by ricky_charlet · · Score: 1

    Why do I get depressed every time I hear that technology is making my life more convienient. I'm not really worried about a "terminator future". I think it has more to do with a sence that I keep getting further away from my neighbors.

  66. Re:OK... let's see...uhm....hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lamest. Anti-religion troll. Ever.

  67. Similar devices exist.... by aliensporebomb · · Score: 1

    Tour de France cyclists has similar devices so when
    they are riding thru the mountains their coaches
    can determine from remote whether they are working
    too hard or too light or if they need to ease off
    or change gearing.

    As an avid recreational cyclist I already have a
    wristwatch styled heart rate monitor that measures
    percentage of maximum heart rate, amount of time
    spent in a pariticular heart rate zone, etc. What
    I'm saying is the technology exists for this and
    has for some time.

  68. Built-in phone?! Why not Bluetooth? by SurryMt · · Score: 1

    Why build in a cell phone -- why not let the phones be phones, and have this device use a nearby bluetooth-capable phone? I suppose the advantage to having it built in is that there is only one device to take/wear, but if you're already carrying a phone around, why carry two?

  69. Another step closer to Shadowrun.... by Cellshade · · Score: 1

    DocWagon bracelets become a reality.

    I can't wait until I can get an armed medevac from a hostile situation no matter where I am!

  70. star trek anybody? by xpyr · · Score: 1

    Isn't this the kind of device that is shown on star trek again and again for patients at risk but don't want to stay in sick bay 24/7?

  71. Re:A very bad idea. No Luke, follow the sun. by 2005g · · Score: 1

    The cardiologist doesn't have to get up at 3am. Think globally. You should have interns/nurses hooked up around the world. They hook in, call the patient, find out what's going on. THEN , if it's serious the cardiologist gets woken up. So what if the nurse/intern has an indian accent. That's what cheat sheets are for. Let them sort out the wheat from the chaff. That's why they pay the cardiologists so much. Because when the shit hits the fan, it's real, not the patient laying a particularly long cable.

  72. Check the Maker by AUDIOMIND · · Score: 1

    http://www.tadspec.com/home.php

    Tadiran Spectralink Ltd., a member of the Elisra Group, is a highly specialized producer of advanced wireless communications systems for all types of manned and unmanned aerial and ground platforms, surfave naval vessels, guided weapons and space platforms, as well as state-of-the-art Search and Rescue systems for a variety of applications.

    Through the years, Tadiran Spectralink has won international recognition as one of the major players in its field. The companys products are in service in some of Israels most sophisticated technological systems and are a significant contribution to its defense capabilities. Many of these products are fielded worldwide.

  73. is possibile ? by george2000 · · Score: 1

    I've noticed several sites on the Internet that promote a penis enlargement through "ancient" techniques of strengthening (and yes, lengthening) the penis through exercises. These sites claim that since the penis is a muscle, it can be conditioned and exercised for greater and permanent length and girth. Is this possible?