Slashdot Mirror


Largest US Anime Distributor Goes BitTorrent

securitas writes "The New York Times' Charles Solomon reports that 'ADV Films, the largest distributor of anime in the United States is releasing promotional packages via the BitTorrent.' The use of BitTorrent is already extremely popular among anime fans who trade films that are unavailable outside of Japan as well as their own subtitled versions, known as fansubs. The company's first experiment with a Madlax torrent in July was so well-received that ADV is launching the bonus promotional packages for upcoming releases Gilgamesh and Goddanar. The question is will other distributors and studios follow ADV's example or stick to their current distribution models?"

145 comments

  1. Nice Biased Article by Zelucifer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    So am I the only one annoyed by the extremely negative connotations used by the "reporter"? Apparently World of Warcraft's use of bit torrent was illegal, or just plain unknown! Or perhaps those who distribute anime truly are the bane of good.

    --
    The corner of a round room
    1. Re:Nice Biased Article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The "reporter" is still under the assumption that copyright enfringement is "theft", and thus all fansubbers must be raping, pillaging pirates who go around killing the American Dream. Even though more than half the series that come out through BitTorrent download sites by "illegitimate" fansubbers are never, ever picked up by American distributors, because they aren't "popular" enough or may have "anti-American" values, or cant be twisted into an American cartoon through careful photoshopping and editing - Cardcaptor Sakura is a good example of a cute series turned into a marketing ploy.

      I personally don't buy a single damn DVD or CD of anything before I at least watch it through a downloaded copy these days. Too much crap to sift through to find the good stuff. I would not have bought any of the DVD's I own if I had not had the option to watch it through fansubbing.

    2. Re:Nice Biased Article by Tx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So am I the only one annoyed by the extremely negative connotations used by the "reporter"? Apparently World of Warcraft's use of bit torrent was illegal, or just plain unknown! Or perhaps those who distribute anime truly are the bane of good.

      Probably. I mean, well done, you managed to think of one example of BT being used for a legal purpose, and if pressed you could probably think of a few more. But the vast majority of BT traffic is pirated content, and the reporters tone is pretty justified. I'm a fan of BT, and I hope it continues to find more mainstream legal uses, but let's not delude ourselves about the current state of play.

      --
      Oh no... it's the future.
    3. Re:Nice Biased Article by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No.

      Copyright infringement is copyright infringement.

      Theft is theft.

      They are two diferent things.

    4. Re:Nice Biased Article by Travelsonic · · Score: 1
      ...but simply saying it's not theft won't make it true.

      Likewise, saying it is and not providing any sources will not make it so either.

      --
      If you believe in privacy, and believe you have "nothing to hide" at the same time, you're a goddammed idiot
    5. Re:Nice Biased Article by Cylix · · Score: 1

      Are you on crack?

      Every large media download seems to have a BT link.

      Trailers, demos, patches, linux releases....

      Just keep painting the world red, but in the end it doesn't matter because no protocol is capable of doing misdeeds on its own.

      So instead of believing in the misdirection why don't you just say there are sites offering illegitimate copies of software and media. Granted, that would make your comment off topic, but in full scope of things it already is.

      There is little reason to blame bit torrent for wrong or right... it's a senseless accussation. Next, were going to blame http servers and ftp servers for serving illegal content.

      Alas, I wish http were used for more legitimate purposes, but those bastard pirates have put a black mark on this protocol with their seedy hands!

      --
      "You should always go to other people's funerals; otherwise, they won't come to yours." -- Yogi Berra
    6. Re:Nice Biased Article by xenocide2 · · Score: 1

      More useful things that should be banned for a "majority infringing use:"
      1. IRC DCC Bots
      2. FTP servers
      3. Usenet newsgroups
      4. AIM filesharing

      Opponents of BT must first recognize that any technology suitable for the legitimate uses will be suitable for some illlegitimate uses. As far as I can tell, software cannot be moral or immoral, good or evil, or right or wrong. Only the people who use it and what they accomplish with it.

      --
      I Browse at +4 Flamebait

      Open Source Sysadmin

    7. Re:Nice Biased Article by slavemowgli · · Score: 1

      You're absolutely right. Software isn't inherently good or bad; it's simply a tool that can be used for different purposes. So, grandparent poster, I take it that in order to restore order, we'd better also ban: * Phone lines (POTS, that is) * Cell phones * Fax machines * Postal services * Roads All these can be used to distribute "pirated" material. Oh no!

      --
      quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
    8. Re:Nice Biased Article by slavemowgli · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Eh. Fuck Slashdot and its defaulting to HTML instead of plain text. >_

      --
      quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
    9. Re:Nice Biased Article by blackicye · · Score: 1

      I actually thought Blizzard's use of BitTorrent was innovative (and extremely cheap)

      Though now there is an option to direct download your updates from extremely low bandwidth servers (damn cheapskates)

      Using BT to distribute free or heavily subsidised content is something I think the masses will happily embrace.

      Delivering content that is charged at full price though..I don't see why I have would want lower transfer rates and to tie up my upstream bandwidth whilst purchasing material.

      Its not like they're doing me a favor by letting me pay them full retail price or very close to that, to obtain their product at a slower rate at the expense of my bandwidth.

      The movie and music industry aren't interested in BT because it lowers their distribution costs. They're interested because it can potentially increase their profit margins.

    10. Re:Nice Biased Article by Tx · · Score: 1

      There is little reason to blame bit torrent for wrong or right... it's a senseless accussation. Next, were going to blame http servers and ftp servers for serving illegal content.

      Who's talking about blame? The author of the article reflected the impression in the mainstream media that bittorrent is very widely used for distribution of pirated content. I pointed out to the OP that the article's author is quite correct about that, and shouldn't be criticised for displaying that opinion. I made no statement about bittorrent being to blame for the piracy, that would be silly.

      --
      Oh no... it's the future.
    11. Re:Nice Biased Article by Warblimp · · Score: 1

      As I recall from the beginings of BT, it was widely used as a means to distribute Linux distros, and the apps that would be used by them. But wait I don't have to think that far back. It is currently the top method for getting your new distro out there. As for this reporter's tone, it is merely a reflection of what community he chooses to examine using torrents, and as so the masses which he dis/informs.

      --
      Beware the observant.
    12. Re:Nice Biased Article by dirty · · Score: 1

      Man, you are full of yourself and a moron. Good job!

      --

      -matt
  2. About time by psy · · Score: 1

    Its about time some major players start utilising this technology.

    I hope the RIAA takes notice.

    1. Re:About time by sveiki_neliels · · Score: 1

      Takes notice all the way to pressuring other industries out of intelligent moves like this one. The RIAA, and groups like it are far from done trying to squeeze P2P until they can have arrested every 12-year-old who has ever traded an MP3.

      Oh, they'll take notice alright.

      --
      New slang when you notice the stripes, the dirt in your fries.
    2. Re:About time by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      The anime industry need to give me something worth my time and effort first. Last great anime IMHO is still "Ninja Scroll" and "Battle Angel". Everything else since has been disappointment, which covers the past few years. Yes, disappointment includes the highly overrated "Cowboy Bebop".

    3. Re:About time by ninjakoala · · Score: 1

      Uhm...

      Here's a list of Stuff That Doesn't Suck (TM)
      Neon Genesis Evangelion (some won't get it, but it's still massively awesome)
      Tokyo Godfathers
      Serial Experiment Lain
      Berserk
      Gunbuster
      Escaflowne
      FLCL
      Jin-Roh The Wolf Brigade
      Memories
      Perfect Blue
      Spring and Chaos
      Macross Plus
      Paranoia Agent

      Now these are all very different, but I'm sure you'll be able to find at least something you'll like in there. On the other hand I also like Bebop, even though it's not among my favourite series, so ...

      --
      Against the grain
    4. Re:About time by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

      Macross Plus was good, but it wasn't "great".

      Neon Genesis Evangelion was just too dragged out for me.

      I did see Lain and I seriously think I will enjoy it 10 years later, just not now. It seems way ahead of its time.

    5. Re:About time by blackicye · · Score: 1

      Meh "Ninja Scroll" is overrated, Yes, I've watched both movies and the complete TV Series.

      Its all a matter of taste really, by the same token this statement is true:

      "Hollywood needs to give me something worth my time and effort first. [Insert 2 movies you like.] Everything else since has been disappointment, which covers the past few decades.

    6. Re:About time by Xaria · · Score: 1

      Noir is also excellent, and I liked Haibane Renmai too, but since the latter is non-violence and non-sex it may not appeal to most anime watchers ;)

    7. Re:About time by MsGeek · · Score: 1

      "Samurai Champloo"...Samurai drama meets Hip Hop meets "Pulp Fiction" by the folks who brought you "Cowboy Bebop." Currently showing on Adult Swim. You'll love it. Trust me.

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
  3. Slashdot tries torrent for dupes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Due to the overwhelming number of dupes, Slashdot is going to offer torrents so more people can access them.

    1. Re:Slashdot tries torrent for dupes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That was a different article, smart guy.

    2. Re:Slashdot tries torrent for dupes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's the same story, dumb ass. It's the same company doing the same thing. The only difference is that this is a month later in a different place.

      Original: "ADV Films is testing out using BitTorrent as a distribution method."
      Dupe: "ADV Films, the largest distributor of anime in the United States is releasing promotional packages via the BitTorrent."

      See?

  4. When will BT be webbased? by thijsa · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What bittorrent really needs is proper browser integration. Only when using bittorrent is equally easy as just clicking a web link (i.e., no external programs, configuration etc., just the IE/firefox download window) it will be massively used. When you need azureus/bittornado or anything else, the public will remain small.

    1. Re:When will BT be webbased? by Agret · · Score: 5, Informative
      --
      Have you metaroderated recently?
    2. Re:When will BT be webbased? by Celt · · Score: 1

      Its intergrated into the next version of Opera, however I do believe a basic Firefox extention would be most usefull :)

      --
      "WebTV: bringing the Internet into the shallow end of the gene pool since 1995" - Martin Bishop
    3. Re:When will BT be webbased? by EiZei · · Score: 1

      Oh I shall remember the day when I can download windows vista with IE's integrated BT client.

    4. Re:When will BT be webbased? by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 1

      TBH what it really needs is a proxy protocol... something that lets it run on NAT networks.

      At the moment your option is:

      1. port forward 6881-6889 to a single machine.. Sucks if you have more than one machine (there are a dozen machines on this network and I'm damned if I'm updating the firewall every time someone decided to use bittorrent instead of ftp).

      2. Don't do it, and suffer 0.5k/sec transfers making the protocol useless.

    5. Re:When will BT be webbased? by dirty · · Score: 1

      I think we also need an Apache module for it. Something so you can just drop your file into a directory and Apache will automatically act as a tracker for it and seed it to a predefined list of mirrors. Instead of having a list of mirrors to download from, you could download from all of the mirrors at once and spread the load out far more evenly.

      --

      -matt
    6. Re:When will BT be webbased? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We also need mail, mp3 playing, terminal programs, word processors and spread sheets integrated into the browser!

      Or you can simply associate .torrent files w/ a bittorrent client.

    7. Re:When will BT be webbased? by Norgus · · Score: 1
      3. Use a decent client like Azureus which only requires a single port forwarded for as many torrents as you want to run.

      4. ???

      5. Profit!

    8. Re:When will BT be webbased? by Norgus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The more idiot friendly a peer to peer protocol is made, the more idiots you get. Yay now we get more people who care nothing about seeding and all about the getting!

    9. Re:When will BT be webbased? by jurt1235 · · Score: 1

      My thought too. But when commercial companies use it for promotion and to cut their costs, I think that the leeches will win.

      --

      My wife's sketchblog Blob[p]: Gastrono-me
    10. Re:When will BT be webbased? by Norgus · · Score: 1
      As long as the commercial companies bother to use decent bandwidth to help seed, it will be good in that case.

      Other content that more or less relies on peer seeding will probably be at a loss though.

    11. Re:When will BT be webbased? by nxtw · · Score: 1
      Or you may try one or more of these ideas:
      • You can use a different port. You aren't limited to those ports.
      • You can use a client that supports multiple torrents on one port (BitComet, Azureus)
      • If you have a UPnP router, some clients will automatically forward ports (BitComet, BitTornado)
    12. Re:When will BT be webbased? by Taladar · · Score: 1

      What would you want with a several centuries old windows version (by the time they implement this)?

    13. Re:When will BT be webbased? by foniksonik · · Score: 1

      If it's a plugin just for viewing such promos, like movie trailers, etc. it could done in a way that doesn't allow for not seeding. Most idiots wouldn't know the difference and the source provider could set up mirrors to be default seeds for geo-regions, etc.

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
    14. Re:When will BT be webbased? by poopdeville · · Score: 1

      You don't even need that much. UPnP takes care of it for you.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    15. Re:When will BT be webbased? by HD+Webdev · · Score: 1

      The more idiot friendly a peer to peer protocol is made, the more idiots you get. Yay now we get more people who care nothing about seeding and all about the getting!

      That's one of the reasons that USENET is still going strong with quality file trading after all of these years. Since it's still (relatively compared to P2P) hard to post/leech (combining parts, dealing with missing ones, etc...) easily without seperate pieces of software to deal with it, it is ignored by the masses and the media.

      It takes an hour or so to learn how to use USENET well by reading FAQs. With P2P, there are wizards that take care of that and people can start downloading complete files in less than a minute.

      --
      This is not a dream, not a dream...we are transmitting from the year 1-9-9-9.
    16. Re:When will BT be webbased? by Norgus · · Score: 1

      Although it is almost heart-warming to see the number of people who are stumped at opening and/or forwarding a port or so. :-)

    17. Re:When will BT be webbased? by blackicye · · Score: 1

      Well part of the problem is not everyone has the "Upstream of the Gods +5 (tm)" So it can be hard to achieve good download rates with bittorrent.
      Even if you set all your PCs to static IPs and forward the appropriate ports to it.

      I've found I achieve the highest transfer rates with azureus on a port in the 60k range on a PC with a static IP. But my overall download speed is still limited by sucky upstream (384k) due to the nature of the protocol.

      Also you should consider changing your BT port(s) from the default 6881 - 6889 as many ISPs are starting to throttle or even outright block those ports.

    18. Re:When will BT be webbased? by Fweeky · · Score: 1

      Opera already has this in the 8.10 beta: see their snapshots site. Seems to work nicely; it's not exactly Azureus, but it works, mostly.

    19. Re:When will BT be webbased? by eMartin · · Score: 1

      The latest Opera apparently already offers this.

    20. Re:When will BT be webbased? by Norgus · · Score: 1
      ISPs must be largely to blame for most people having sucky upload rates. Maybe if we're lucky once bittorrent has become big as a commercial distribution tool ISPs will recognise the demand for upstream bandwidth and adapt services to fit.

      phsh that would be expecting too much probably.

    21. Re:When will BT be webbased? by Agret · · Score: 1

      Opera is not a free browser. The average user won't be using it, if you are techy enough to pay for a browser your going to know how to use BitTorrent.

      --
      Have you metaroderated recently?
  5. Hmm? by Agret · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The question is will other distributors and studios follow ADV's example or stick to their current distribution models?

    Well it's not really a distribution model. They are just releasing promo material. You can already get promo material from most distributors just not over BitTorrent. This is really nothing new.

    --
    Have you metaroderated recently?
  6. Yes, other markets.... by TsukasaZero · · Score: 1, Funny

    I really wish the pr0n industry would take notice and give me downloads over the internet.



    Oh wait....





    Woops....

  7. "Via the bittorrent"? by sucker_muts · · Score: 1

    Via the bittorrent?

    It's a protocol, not a network like kazaa/eMule/eDonkey...

    (Yes I know eMule/eDonkey uses specific servers to connect to, but with the UDP search technology you can search a lot of servers together, if they support it.)

    --
    Dependency hell? => /bin/there/done/that
    1. Re:"Via the bittorrent"? by Fatalis · · Score: 1

      eMule is just a client, and the network is called eDonkey2000 (mind the correct name) or just ed2k. There's a client called eDonkey2000 too, but I don't think people use it nowadays.

      --
      Deus est fatalis
    2. Re:"Via the bittorrent"? by yossarian+dent · · Score: 1
      Yeah, you know, like the e-mail. Don't tell me you're not on the e-mail.

      I hear you can even send the mp3's through the e-mail these days.

      --
      sig not ready: (A)bort, (R)etry, (F)ail.
  8. bittorrent!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    torrent rulezz!!!

  9. Promotional Packages? Get DRM going! by Transcendor · · Score: 1

    That seems to be the point: using BitTorrent to distribute free(as in beer) content. BitTorrent is able to distribute identical files among many users fast (and scales well even with HUGE user bases).
    But companies need to make money. And anime distributors need to sell videos. But BitTorrent is a rather open system. You can use a tracker with authentication, but that won't work with things like the dynamic tracker protocoll and so an developing. You'll have to secure the actual content. How can that be made? You'll have to encrypt it somehow. But because Bittorrent will only distribute identical files, you'll have to use one encrypted version for all- that means you'll need a server giving away "viewing keys"- better known as active DRM.
    so this use of open software and protocolls will actually enforce DRM -- watch what you'Re doing.
    ---the tail will bite you

    1. Re:Promotional Packages? Get DRM going! by jamiethehutt · · Score: 1

      BitTorrent is able to distribute identical files among many users fast (and scales well even with HUGE user bases).

      Lost Season 1 Episodes 1-25, 8.8Gb in size, 399 seeders (people who have it), 5784 peers (people who are getting it). I'm normally getting about 35Kb/s.

      I'd say thats scaling pretty well. :D

    2. Re:Promotional Packages? Get DRM going! by sycomonkey · · Score: 1

      Do you know how much more anime I'd buy if I could just download it and it was cheaper that way? It could be marketed simularly to the current "thin-pak" boxsets that don't have any extras, but are 15-30% cheaper than the normal sized boxsets. This stuff is so expensive as it is, I can only ever afford to buy the series I really like. They'd sell the stuff like hotcakes. Digital hotcakes, even.

      --
      --The universe will not be altered by forum threads, even those which are very wry. --Tycho Brahe (Penny Arcade)
    3. Re:Promotional Packages? Get DRM going! by patio11 · · Score: 1

      You don't strictly speaking need to DRM anything. Just release episode #1 on bittorrent and episodes 2-26 on DVD only. You assume that no one would be happy with just consuming the first episode of your series and therefore it doesn't cost you anything to release it for free (they'll still buy DVD #1 to get episodes 2,3, and 4).

  10. If you can't beat 'em... by frostman · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't know much about Anime culture per se, but I think this is a pretty enlightened move.

    With promotional freebies, distributing via BitTorrent gets you free publicity and lowers your distribution costs to practically nothing. Furthermore, doing it through your own trackers is likely to give you realistic download statistics, which are very valuable in themselves. (And why go to, say, Pirate Bay if the publisher itself is seeding?)

    For commercial products you'd rather sell, there's also something to be said for BitTorrent distribution. If you know that a significant portion of your customers are going to trade the files on P2P anyway, and you realize there's *nothing* you can do to stop it, why not get some love by seeding the things yourself?

    Of course that doesn't get you to the magic "3. Profit!" all by itself, but at least you get something back from a process that's inevitable anyway.

    That leaves the question of how to turn that good will into a buck (or Yen), which I admit is not easy. But as it stands Hollywood isn't even interested in trying, so it's nice to see someone inching down a new path.

    --

    This Like That - fun with words!

    1. Re:If you can't beat 'em... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can only guess how this is going to end. A guess would be that the media companies as usual thinks of something in the likes of. 'Hey, we let you handle all the distribution costs, all promotion, and so on, but we are still going to charge you as much as we would if you went to a store and bought the product'.

    2. Re:If you can't beat 'em... by Bones3D_mac · · Score: 1

      Probably not as enlightened as we'd like to think. ADV hasn't been doing so well lately, with rampant layoffs, etc within the company. Combined with degrading product quality and an industry wide fad quickly reaching the end of the cycle, there's no where left to go but down.

      If anything, this is a move of desperation on ADV's part rather than a move of simply embracing a technology because it works.

      --


      8==8 Bones 8==8
    3. Re:If you can't beat 'em... by Silverlancer · · Score: 1

      The problem is still there, however. IMO the biggest problem with getting people to actually buy their anime (rather than bittorrent fansubs) is threefold:

      1) The fansubs are often better translated than the real thing. Most DVDs I have gotten have remarkably bad subtitles.
      2) The price. It costs 20-30 dollars per 4 episodes (80 minutes). Thats absolutely ridiculous!
      3) There is no easy, convenient way to watch an anime series once unless your local video store has it (unlikely). Thus, anyone who wants to watch it once just bittorrents it or gets it from a friend, because it wouldn't be worth spending some horribly gouging 400-500 dollars on a series.

    4. Re:If you can't beat 'em... by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      1) I've seen a few bad subtitles, but nothing nearly as bad as I've seen on fansubs.

      2) Start looking around for some collections. You can get full 24-26 episode seasons for $30-40.

      3) Netflix.

      One huge problem with this route is that with fansubs, the people that make the work, the animators and producers in Japan and elsewhere, make no money from fansubs, basically it leeches the work of others.

    5. Re:If you can't beat 'em... by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Oops, I made some mistakes in the previous post.

      1) I've seen a few bad subtitles, but nothing nearly as bad as I've seen on some fansubs. Unless maybe you've been buying bootlegs, then that doesn't count, funding criminals and all, when fansubbers commit the deed for free. Check the Berne Convention if you don't believe me, fansubbing and bootlegging really is against the law in most countries because of this treaty.

      2) Start looking around for some collections. You can get full 24-26 episode seasons for $30-40, and these are licenced collections, not bootlegs.

      3) Netflix.

      One huge problem with this route is that with fansubs, the people that make the work, the animators and producers in Japan and elsewhere, make no money from fansubs, basically it leeches the work of others.

    6. Re:If you can't beat 'em... by Bones3D_mac · · Score: 1

      Of course, this ignores the fact that fansubs are what drive the industry. ADV, CPM, etc.. all rely on fansubs to determine whether or not a market for a particular series exists before spending the money needed to officially license them for distribution in the US.

      In effect, fansubs do eventually generate profits for both licensees and the original owners of an anime series.

      Of course, now that we have DMCA style laws popping up around the world now, fansubs are getting much harder to find and support. Perhaps this is one reason why the overall quality of commercially released anime has began to suffer.

      --


      8==8 Bones 8==8
    7. Re:If you can't beat 'em... by v1 · · Score: 1

      The model I believe they are adopting is "first one's free". In this case, they are showing either promos, or sometimes the first several episodes of a series, to get you interested.

      As you pointed out, the distribution costs for BT are practically free, compared to say mailing out promo DVDs or even bundling promo DVDs with other titles. The only other medium that's even close to it in benefit per cost is promos bundled ON other titles' DVDs, which we've been seeing for years now. With anime at least, it's not uncommon for each DVD in a set to include promos for 4-10 other titles, or sometimes even the entire episode 1 of a series or two.

      This is really a nice compliment to their existing promo strategy, and allows them to deliver fresh content to the masses. Instead of picking which four series they put a promo for on their next release, they can just put up promos for all 35 of their current series and you can go grab ep 1 and 2 of any that strike your interest. Much more effective really. And I really like to be able to look at the first ep or two to decide if I like the series or not. So much better than shelling out cash for disc 1 and finding it's not to my taste. I could have spent that $26 on another title I might have liked, and would have bought the entire series of. But I've already spent my weekly budget for checking out new series, so they may have just lost my $80 for the rest of another series.

      BT is helping us get the content we want, not have to pay for content we don't like, and is helping sales and costs for the distributors. I think this is a true win-win situation.

      --
      I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
    8. Re:If you can't beat 'em... by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      why go to, say, Pirate Bay if the publisher itself is seeding?

      Probably for the same reason people download various Linux distros off of MiniNova, Suprnova (when it existed) and other torrent sites -- it's all aggregated in one place where everyone can see it when they go to get their 1337 0-d4y w4r3z (yes, I realize 0-day warez doesn't show up on those sites; no lectures on the pirate chain, please).

    9. Re:If you can't beat 'em... by Maestro4k · · Score: 1
      I don't know much about Anime culture per se, but I think this is a pretty enlightened move. Not really, all they're distributing is promo matierial, in other words commercials. So now you get to help pay for ADV to distribute its promos to the Internet at large. It would be fair to say this is taking advantage of Anime fans.

      Now if they were distributing full episodes and working on a model that allowed them to do that and make money as well that would be enlightened. Now all you really have is the anime equivalent of Apple's Quicktime trailers site except it's only one company's trailers and the consumers get to help pay for the distribution.

      With promotional freebies, distributing via BitTorrent gets you free publicity and lowers your distribution costs to practically nothing. Furthermore, doing it through your own trackers is likely to give you realistic download statistics, which are very valuable in themselves. (And why go to, say, Pirate Bay if the publisher itself is seeding?) Free Publicity, free statistics and a huge amount of "free" (to ADV) bandwidth just to let people download trailers.

      Why go to Pirate Bay? Because they'll have full episodes if not entire seasons and ADV's site will only have trailers. Not much of a comparison there.

      For commercial products you'd rather sell, there's also something to be said for BitTorrent distribution. If you know that a significant portion of your customers are going to trade the files on P2P anyway, and you realize there's *nothing* you can do to stop it, why not get some love by seeding the things yourself? This is a great idea but it's _not_ what ADV is doing at this time. They are only providing promo matierial (trailers/commercials) and not complete episodes or series. Maybe they will in the future but I have my doubts given ADV's history and how it has treated fans in the past. That leaves the question of how to turn that good will into a buck (or Yen), which I admit is not easy. But as it stands Hollywood isn't even interested in trying, so it's nice to see someone inching down a new path. ADV's not inching down that path at all, they're just getting anime fans to foot the bandwidth bills to distribute promo matierials. This is not enlightened, this is not embracing Bittorrent. This is simply distribuing promos in another way.

      Now if they said they were going to test the waters with providing episodes/series by Bittorrent, even if you have to pay to gain access to the tracker, _then_ it would be something to talk about. As it is it's all just marketing fluff.

    10. Re:If you can't beat 'em... by echocharlie · · Score: 1

      You're right about the layoff's, but I believe it's more of a period of streamlining as opposed to degradation. The anime industry enjoyed a period of success over the last few years. The market is just flooded at this point, and we'll see a period of market correction at this point. The industry should stabilize and the companies that are left will be stronger and better organized.

  11. One success is hardly enough by Tim_F · · Score: 1

    to make one company (not to mention every other anime distributor in North America) decide to switch their distribution model from the current one to Bit Torrent. Bit Torrent is really nice. It works well for Linux Distributions and other things that are given away for free. Hell, it even helps save the distributor some bandwidth. This is a good thing. However, given the popularity of BT programs like Azureus I can hardly see BT being popular as a for-pay distribution method. Azureus can be used to circumvent any distribution restrictions that a torrent publisher attempts to put on a torrent. This is not a good thing for those that believe that information does not want to be free (unfortunately a goodly number of slashbots subscribe to that newsletter).

    1. Re:One success is hardly enough by tepples · · Score: 1

      Azureus can be used to circumvent any distribution restrictions that a torrent publisher attempts to put on a torrent.

      Including putting phone-home DRM around the keys required to decrypt and play the work encoded by the file? How would Azureus circumvent that?

  12. Don't read too much into this by 20th+Century+Boy · · Score: 1

    While it is a rather big step for an anime company to be using BT to distribute promotional material, just because ADV is doing it doesn't mean it will become a trend, particularly in light of ADV's recent financial troubles and staff cutbacks. Let's just say that the rest of the industry won't look towards ADV as a shining example of how to run a business, as they've made what has been viewed as some serious mistakes, such as licensing too many series that don't sell and flooding the manga market with substandard works.

    As for the promo itself, these three series will need all the publicity they can get to actually become popular. Godanner has the reputation of being full of meaningless vapid fanservice, Madlax is viewed as a Noir clone, and Gilgamesh seems to be nothing but a monumental angst fest for the entire duration of the series. I wouldn't call any of them remarkable by any stretch of the imagination.

  13. Where were they at Otakon? by strredwolf · · Score: 1

    I was in the dealers room, and they weren't there. I kept hearing that ADV was not giving that large Anime convention any time of day. That convention would of been perfect for them to annouce their bittorrent service!

    --

    --
    # Canmephians for a better Linux Kernel
    $Stalag99{"URL"}="http://stalag99.net";
    1. Re:Where were they at Otakon? by sailracer6 · · Score: 1

      The ADV people did two panels at Otakon this year. I'm not sure why they didn't have a large booth in the industry section, but they were definitely not ignoring the convention.

      Most of the stuff they showed at their first panel was, as they mentioned, available on their Bittorrent pilot program.

      Not to mention that this Slashdot story is a dupe and ADV has been doing this for months now.

    2. Re:Where were they at Otakon? by echocharlie · · Score: 1

      ADVision never has a big booth at Otakon. They let Suncoast handle sales for them in the Dealer's Room, and they participate in Industry Panels at the event. Dave Williams, one of the producers for ADVision, was there, and mentioned Otakon in his blog yesterday, along with links to the torrents for Madlax and Godannar. You'll need this codec to view these.

  14. I Do Not Believe This by p0 · · Score: 0

    You mean to say that they are pirating their own products??

    * ducks

    --
    This is my sig. There are thousands more, but this one is mine.
  15. Their Business Model by Gaspo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So basically what they're doing is using BitTorrent as their distribution system, ok. BitTorrent can perhaps now be shown as a legitimate tool used not just for illegal file sharing. Oh wait, the media would never allow themselves to be wrong. Ah, there was a glimmer of hope...

    1. Re:Their Business Model by daspriest · · Score: 1

      What's really funny is, I remember when illegal file sharing was accomplished via an FTP site. Before that it was Newsgroups(and in some cases still is). The media never jumped on those distribution methods and labeled them evil. How is BitTorrent any different? They all have legitimate and illegitimate reasons to use them. Hell, I just used BitTorrent to get the latest version of FreeBSD.

    2. Re:Their Business Model by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 1

      So basically what they're doing is using BitTorrent as their distribution system,

      No, they are using BT as their distribution system for their commercials, not for anything that is a direct revenue generator.

      In the anime community ADV is well-known for some of the suckiest customer-facing behaviour from any publisher. While the engineer who has been the internal promoter of using BT this way is a good enough chap, management clearly sees it as a way to advertise for really, really cheap - they don't even have to pay the bandwidth costs because they let their customers do it for them.

      Its a smart business move - as long as the customers don't wise up to how ADV management sees it - but it is not even close to being as visionary or risk taking as it would require to distribute their actual content over a public torrent.

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    3. Re:Their Business Model by Altima(BoB) · · Score: 1

      Oh wait, the media would never allow themselves to be wrong.

      Only in the way Big Brother can never be wrong. It doesn't mean they can't change their position.

      --
      Yup...
  16. Bonus Material by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe BitTorrent could be used for when later editions of DVDs etc which you have already bought get rereleased with bonus material. That way you could just download the bonus material which you should be entitled to as you paid for the DVD originally.

    Obviously this won't hapen as you get all the die hards (LotR for example) who buy the film when it first comes out, then spend even more cash on the "Uber extended bells and whilstles every second of footage even when we accidentally left the cameras rolling" edition so they can get twice the amount of dough out of us.

  17. Re:Anime fans, by nuclearpenguins · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Don't worry. You're not alone in your hatred for Anime.

    --
    Anonymous Coward: "This is slashdot. Accuracy is second class citizen here, unlike King Bias."
  18. talking about bittorrent by El_Muerte_TDS · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know a good bittorrent server? I'm looking for a daemon like program that automatically starts seeding torrents when it finds them in a directory including subdirectories.
    A daemon with the following features wouldn't hurt:

    * automaticly seed torrents when they are found in a given directory (also when torrents are added while the daemon is running)
    * built-in tracker
    * process friendly, e.g. report as seed but don't have an active thread\process for a single torrent until it's actually needed
    * an option to (temporarily) stop seeding where there are X number of seeds (e.g. only provide initial seeding)

    1. Re:talking about bittorrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Azureus is the only client to my knowledge that can do some of these (can maintain a list of completed torrents for seeding, automatically seeds up to a certain number of them based on demand, has a built-in tracker, etc.), but I'm not sure if that was what you were looking for.

  19. Copyright infringement != theft by tepples · · Score: 3, Informative

    Copyright infringement is theft, at least in the US.

    What makes you say that? In the United States, larceny is a crime defined by state law (except in cases involving state lines or federal property), and copyright infringement is a crime defined by federal law. They're completely different statutes with completely different conditions and completely different penalties.

    1. Re:Copyright infringement != theft by cortana · · Score: 1

      Is 'theft' actually a crime at all? Or when a layman says 'theft', should he strictly speaking use the word 'larceny'?

    2. Re:Copyright infringement != theft by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the UK at least, if you return the item before the owner wants to use it, it's not a crime.

  20. the difference by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 1

    The difference is that, without BitTorrent or its ilk, distributors have to pay for the bandwidth to send those files to the people who want them, and if that material gets popular those servers are going to get expensive, or badly crowded, or both. The question is how much of a boost over the bottom line BitTorrent gives them. Considering the size of some of these promos, I wouldn't be surprised if it's significant.

  21. movies by zogger · · Score: 1

    At 20$ a DVD for a movie, I buy zero. If it was 5 movies for 20$ I would probably pick up a 5 pack once a month or so. And I see DVDs of very old stuff selling new for 2$ at Walmart, so I don't want hollyweird to say they couldn't sell the disks cheaper and make it up on volume sales. They are so out to lunch on pricing. Same with music basically. Now I don't download either (don't want to plus on dialup), but I would be in the market if they got real on hard media distribution and pricing. I've gone to mostly only used media I find cheap for sale.

    Just am not going to pay those ridiculous prices for new music and movies for a plastic disk that costs pennies to mass produce.

    1. Re:movies by Mononoke · · Score: 1
      Just am not going to pay those ridiculous prices for new music and movies for a plastic disk that costs pennies to mass produce.
      You do realize you are paying for more than just a plastic disk, don't you?

      No, probably not.

      --
      NetInfo connection failed for server 127.0.0.1/local
    2. Re:movies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a ridiculously misguided post. I honestly can't tell if you're a pathetic troll, or just plain pathetic.

  22. Land of the Lost World in Space by tepples · · Score: 1

    Lost Season 1

    Lost where? In space? Or Land of the Lost? What about Sir Arthur Conan Doyle's The Lost World? Oh, it appears you're looking for Walt Disney's Lost. One word: Bleh.

    I'm normally getting about 35Kb/s.

    Except remember that BitTorrent reports rates in bytes, not bits. A rate of 35 KB per second is better than you'd get on HTTP.

    I'd say thats scaling pretty well. :D [assuming sarcasm]

    Just go to bed and it'll speed up. Often the Peers will remain online overnight, and they'll turn into Seeds, freeing up other Seeds to send to you. If a lot of Seeds jump off before they build up a share ratio, then you're on the wrong tracker.

  23. Read The Finite Article by tepples · · Score: 1

    Via the bittorrent?

    Not everybody is born in anglophone territory. Other languages have different rules on when definite articles are used, and mistakes may spill over into a fellow's use of English as a second or foreign language.

    with the UDP search technology you can search a lot of servers together, if they support it.

    It's too bad that the Azureus protocol and the BitTorrent protocol for the newer distributed features are mutually incompatible.

  24. 3 cheers for /. groupthink! by antifoidulus · · Score: 1

    Any opinion that is unpopular automatically is a "troll"

    Big brother must love you guys, you prove that it's easy to make everyone follow the leader.

    1. Re:3 cheers for /. groupthink! by Travelsonic · · Score: 1
      Any opinion that is unpopular automatically is a "troll

      In this case no, any comment that is just stated as fact without fact, or that is knowingly false will be marked as troll.

      --
      If you believe in privacy, and believe you have "nothing to hide" at the same time, you're a goddammed idiot
    2. Re:3 cheers for /. groupthink! by ultranova · · Score: 3, Informative

      Any opinion that is unpopular automatically is a "troll"

      Perhaps, but the parent post didn't state an opinion. It stated an incorrect fact ("Copyright infringement is theft, at least in the US. Like it or not that's how the law is currently written.") with the apparent purpose of annoying people - the rest of the message was quite arrogant and condescending ("If you don't agree with it, try to get the law changed, but simply saying it's not theft won't make it true."). Stating an incorrect fact with the apparent purpose of annoying people enough that they start responding is trolling.

      Sometimes, an unpopular position is unpopular for the reason that it is incorrect, and sometimes getting moderated as Troll is justified.

      Big brother must love you guys, you prove that it's easy to make everyone follow the leader.

      Yes, disturbingly many people seem to be accepting the claim "copyright infringement is theft", despite both law and logic disagreeing with that...

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    3. Re:3 cheers for /. groupthink! by Travelsonic · · Score: 1

      Sorry, that should read In this case no, any comment that is just stated as fact without proof, or that is knowingly false will be marked as troll.

      --
      If you believe in privacy, and believe you have "nothing to hide" at the same time, you're a goddammed idiot
    4. Re:3 cheers for /. groupthink! by mOdQuArK! · · Score: 1

      Amazing - I don't think I've ever seen a message where every single statement contradicts reality so completely.

    5. Re:3 cheers for /. groupthink! by PhucYuew · · Score: 1

      while i tend to agree with you, i'm terribly misinformed on this topic...

      perhaps you could include a fact or two in your post railing against lacking correct facts

      honestly, i would love to hear some of the finer legal arguments on both sides -- how does one define theft? when is it different than borrowing? if i were to lend you a cd, and asked for it back in a week, and you ignore me for a while, at what point is that theft?

      what if you rip the tracks but don't give the cd back -- you're sure as shit stealing from me...but are you really stealing from the artist?

    6. Re:3 cheers for /. groupthink! by hkmwbz · · Score: 1
      "how does one define theft?"
      It is the crime of taking someone else's property without consent. And property, as we know, is physical.
      "when is it different than borrowing?"
      Uh... "How is up different than down?"

      Why do you even need to ask? When you borrow something, you are given permission by the owner to use it. When did borrowing something become a crime? Because you must believe that it is since you are comparing it to one (theft)...

      "if i were to lend you a cd, and asked for it back in a week, and you ignore me for a while, at what point is that theft?"
      I fail to see what this has to do with the difference between theft and copyright infringement. At which point does the larva turn into a butterfly? Just because I can't tell you exactly when it happens doesn't mean that a butterfly is the same as a larva.
      "what if you rip the tracks but don't give the cd back -- you're sure as shit stealing from me...but are you really stealing from the artist?"
      No, the CD was stolen, and the copying was copyright infringement, a totally different thing as most people with a clue know by now.

      You know, just like murder is not theft just because you could say that "murder is taking someone's life away from them so it must be theft", but that is obviously ignoring the differences between murder and theft, and the fact that theft and murder are covered by different laws.

      --
      Clever signature text goes here.
    7. Re:3 cheers for /. groupthink! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It stated an incorrect fact ("Copyright infringement is theft, at least in the US. Like it or not that's how the law is currently written.") with the apparent purpose of annoying people - the rest of the message was quite arrogant and condescending ("If you don't agree with it, try to get the law changed, but simply saying it's not theft won't make it true.").
      And the thing that cracks me up is that no amount of lawmaking can change it. It's like saying:
      "Golf is badminton. Like it or not, that is how the law is written. If you'd rather that golf be a game of swinging a stick at a ball with the intent of landing it into a hole, then try to get the law changed; simply saying that it's not badminton won't make it true."
      Intentional? I don't know. But definitely a troll!
    8. Re:3 cheers for /. groupthink! by Travelsonic · · Score: 1
      I really shouldn't be feeding the trolls, but it is too tempting:


      But uh, dude, that isn't false. It IS a fact, copyright infringement IS theft.

      Again you have failed to prove it, and resorted to only repeating yourself.


      You're taking someone else's property without consent. It doesn't matter that you can make practically infinite copies of the stuff electronically, it doesn't matter that no-one is stopping you from doing it, or that it's easy to do and not get caught, or any of the other justifications people use to keep stealing.

      Apparently to the people ho qwrite our laws, theft needs deprival:


      Since the statutorily defined property rights of a copyright holder have a character distinct from the possessory interest of the owner of simple "goods, wares, [or] merchandise," interference with copyright does not easily equate with theft, conversion, or fraud. The infringer of a copyright does not assume physical control over the copyright nor wholly deprive its owner of its use. Infringement implicates a more complex set of property interests than does run-of-the-mill theft, conversion, or fraud. Pp. 214-218.
      "Downling VS The United States," http://www.netjus.it/pages/giurisprudenzax.asp?art icle=12

      So yeah, your dragging the idea of it being a justification was a red herring to the fact that you have failed to prove your point. What matters in discussing facts is that we have the facts.

      --
      If you believe in privacy, and believe you have "nothing to hide" at the same time, you're a goddammed idiot
    9. Re:3 cheers for /. groupthink! by Travelsonic · · Score: 1

      Not to mention the fact that you are maknig a copy of the "property" (?) not taking it away from the person, which is basically what I said before by not qualifying for theft legally.

      --
      If you believe in privacy, and believe you have "nothing to hide" at the same time, you're a goddammed idiot
  25. Not rocket science by cortana · · Score: 1

    This leaves an opening for another company to say,

    "Hey, we let the customers handle all the costs, and we undercut the other fellows".

    It's called competition. :p

    1. Re:Not rocket science by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean like we have seen in the downloadable music buisness?

    2. Re:Not rocket science by cortana · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Yes.

  26. So how will they feel? by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How will this Anime distributor feel when, rather than promos, outsiders start distributing the full legnth versions of their products on BitTorrent?

    I don't think this question is being addressed. In fact, some seem to want to pretend ADV is distributing more than promos.

    --
    resigned
    1. Re:So how will they feel? by poopdeville · · Score: 1

      It's already happened. They sued Boxtorrents.com over it. IIRC, they settled with the promise that no ADV material would be allowed on the tracker.

      --
      After all, I am strangely colored.
    2. Re:So how will they feel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL. You mean like the entire enecyclopedia of Anime that is on the major BT sites already?

      Its been there for years, and I am sure will continue to be so.

      I think this is a move to squish a little bit of that and get some money back on the hard work these animation houses do, rather than just watch their work get distributed, loved but with no return on their investment.

  27. Dumb questions by Jesus+2.0 · · Score: 1

    Do they expect to ... um ... profit?

    If so, how?

  28. Doesn't make sense... by ssummer · · Score: 1
    Why is everybody so excited about using Bittorrent as a means for a commercial enterprise to distribute media?

    I mean why would anyone want to have to install and setup another piece of software, load it up, and then share your bandwidth in the hopes that everyone else is doing the same so that your download can be a little faster?

    I don't know about you but I would definitely prefer that the damn company increase their download bandwidth so that they can support thousands of users direct-downloading their material at speeds similar to a heavily seeded BT file without worrying about how many people are actually seeding the file.

    Of course this is not a perfect world and most companies would not shell out the extra bucks to increase their bandwidth when they have a somewhat free alternative that shifts the costs/burden to you. But it gets even better for them when we have a bunch of BT cheerleaders who try to make it sound like it's a good thing for us!

    These companies are not doing us any favors by distributing via BT. The stuff is either promotional or content you paid for. Why help them profit when they are too cheap to spend $$$ on the better distribution model (that being direct downloads)?

    1. Re:Doesn't make sense... by FLEB · · Score: 1

      Either they shift the cost/burden to you, or they... shift the cost/burden to you. You'd either have BitTorrent, or you'd have slow downloads and/or higher prices.

      For most people, using up the background bandwidth is a less painful proposition than paying more or getting less.

      --
      Information wants to be free.
      Entertainment wants to be paid.
      You just want to be cheap.
  29. Dupe? by line.at.infinity · · Score: 1

    First of all, how is this news? ADV films going BitTorrent was already covered. Second of all, what's the significance? Promo clips in general are freely downloadable anyway, just like linux ISO torrents.

  30. Pay for promotion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Heh, this is just promotional short-lenght clips, they're not full lenght episodes. It is just to tease you so you can buy the episodes.

    And they wont even pay and host their own promotional material, heh...

    I'll be cheering when they actually do release full lenght episodes.
    Maybe they dont want to release the freshest episode, but I think it would be nice if they released the episodes older than X months, like 6-12 or so.

  31. Re:Dupe? by rufuseddy · · Score: 0

    I agree with parent but why is it I mention dupe a couple posts down from the top and I get, dupe? (Score:-1, Redundant) , and he gets a 2? Like I said this has nothing to do with the parent I'm just kind of new to posting comments and I dont get how it works. Sorry for the OT.

    --
    Giggidy Giggidy Gigg-a-dy
  32. It's about damn time.... by ShyGuy91284 · · Score: 1

    I've thought for years they should have been doing this for series that didn't have a bad first episode. Free DVDs in anime magazines were a good way to give readers a taste of something new without commiting. Now this gets rid of manufacturing costs, and promotes their anime. Now they just have to hope it doesn't backfire, and cause people not interested in torrents to give it a try, and then realize they can get much much more from torrents if they really want it....

    --
    In undeveloped countries, the consumer controls the market. In capitalist America, the market controls you.
  33. Anime meets sleezy advertizing. by Njall · · Score: 0, Troll

    When they did this promo release in July I was tantalized enough to immediately download it. It was visual tripe. Fast paced clips, 1sec each, with nothing that even begins to suggest what the program is about. Completely void of any value.

    Not worth, IMHO, the time it took to delete it.

  34. Mixed by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
    Now that they're getting involved in bittorrent, I'm a little scared about the future of current fansub BT sites like Animesuki etc. So far, anime companies have been pretty fair about things. They know we fansub stuff, and download it, but in return, they get a chance to see which series will work in the states and which won't, which saves them a ton of money. I'm just concerned that the more they invest in bittorrent, the more they might start cracking down on these sites.

    The reason anime has grown so wildly is because of the distribution systems that the fans have put in place, and the distance the anime companies have kept from it. We kindly remove things when they are licensed, and they leave us alone, that's the "deal".

    Lets pray that corporate greed does not upset that balance and that ADV leads the way for all the other companies into a more harmonious relationship with their fans.

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    1. Re:Mixed by Itanshi · · Score: 1
      i'm gonan reply to thisone and elave the rest of everything well enogh alone

      fansubbers do not all remove anything i have seen fansub groups lose members and split because of the fansub law being broken. i know sites that still fansub lovehina, heck i know a site that had a fansub of vampire hunter d bloodlust!!! (yes the original language track was english and was subbed into japanese in japan, x_x somebody shoot me)

    2. Re:Mixed by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      I'm well aware of this. In fact, I have witnessed it happen with ANBU and Aone when Naruto got licensed. One wouldn't continue subbing it, the other did.

      I didn't mean to imply that every single group would stop. There wil always be rogue groups that continue (and frankly I love them) and its usually for the most popular series, but you'll never get rid of that. So I hope that rather than attack the groups who follow the unwritten agreement, I hope that they just take it as a cost of doing business.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  35. Re:Dupe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi,

    It's because you didn't capitalize the "D."

    Thanks for posting,
    -The Management

  36. is there something with this - by zogger · · Score: 1

    - "sell the disks cheaper and make it up on volume sales."...that you don't understand? I am very familiar with how the industry operates. I have worked movies, tv shows, commercials and rock music before. Take it your direction the opposite way, why don't they charge 100$ for the disk? Won't they make just tons more money?

    Oh ya, they WON'T.

    I am saying that at 20$, a lot of people don't buy as many disks as they might be inclined to buy, in my case it is zero. Same as when VHS tapes came out at like 79$, I bought none, but once they hit 9.99$ I started buying them, and now with the MUCH reduced costs of media reproduction,(I dare anyone to dispute that) there is NO reason for them to charge more than a few bucks per disk other than thinking they can gouge people. Now they whine they aren't selling as many as they thought they would. Well DUH. I am just pointing out why this is so, from a joe working class perspective. Same with new music CDs, people just don't want to pay that frieght, whereas if it is priced more reasonable they would sell a lot more. Production cost for the original content is the same, the only difference would be pumping out more disks, which at factory mega levels is not that much more to go from one copy to 4 copies, it is maybe another 25cents apiece more cost in volume, (something like that, cheap).

    I contend that if disks were priced more as an impulse item, much cheaper, which they could be, they would sell more and they ALREADY are selling *some* brand new DVDs at 2 dollars, proving it can be done. And a lot less people would be downloading unauthorised copies. Why bother when one could grab a handful legitmately for cheap at the store?

    The market is there, they just don't get it because they don't want to get it, they need to step away from expensive Hollywood and NYC digs and see how the rest of the nation lives. Hint to any of those setting the prices: the rest of the nation outside of a handful of large urban areas makes a lot less money at a median level(example, the hollywood/LA area "modest home" at a million is 150 grand in the heartland, and etc), so you can't charge as much as you might think based on what you might be able to afford. People in the rest of the nation just do not have as much "spare" cash for that stuff.

    Nope, those people are out to lunch,and my theory is that they live in an environment where 20 dollars is chump change,almost nothing,so they think that way, wheras for the bulk of the customers they would like to reach it is a small but still serious chunk of cash.

  37. Re:Anime fans, by markass530 · · Score: 1

    Well, I used to hate them, until I was in a video store in the mall once, and these two anime dweebs were basically harrasing this chick about the location of this anime, she was trying to get rid of them, basically letting them know it wasn't out yet or something, I see her plight, mouth I'm sorry to her, and after it still doesn't stop, I kinda tell the guys to bug off, which they more or less do, and I Got a phone number out of the deal. God bless anime fans for making me look good.

  38. Hey. by avasol · · Score: 0

    This is just pr0n for nerds. My Bittorrent is much larger than your Bittorrent. Oh yeah well mine distributes Anime. Wow you'll be on Slashdot now, making millions of teens wet with desire.

  39. Going BitTorrent by Razor+Sex · · Score: 1

    Is this kind of like going super saiyan?

  40. Re:Dupe? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ADV is now releasing promos for more (all?) of its properties. The story you linked was for the single Madlax experimental torrent.
    But, you are correct, promos are nothing to get excited about.

    Not sure how they can use bittorrent in a for profit model anyway.
    -J

  41. Re:no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's ok, it was the anime storytelling that killed GITS-Standalone Complex.

    The *real* stuff, the underground stuff has only gotten better.

  42. reporter needed to do a little bit more research by krunk4ever · · Score: 1

    from what i could tell, the reporter probably just interviewed US anime distributors and that's how he/she got all the information about these 'illegal' fansubbers.

    fansubbing is a gray area if it is anime that hasn't been licensed in the country you're living. i'm not talking about fansubbers that continue to fansub material even after it's licensed. i'm only talking about fansubbers who fansubbed material that won't be available in their language any time soon. in fact, most fansub groups that I know about only fansub unlicensed material, but there are a few in the group who dislike how the american anime companies butcher up the anime by horrible dubbing, bad translations, removing scenes, and slow return time, that they feel like they should go ahead and fansubbed licensed material.

    when an anime is unlicensed in the states, japanese distributors have never told them to stop their work. why? because it's a great way to test how well an anime will do in another country. it also lets us anime licensing companies to check how popular it might get with people living here. without these fansubbers bringing a popularity of these animes so high, i'd doubt that over half of what's available today would've been available.

    fansubbers are a key step for an anime to get to the USA. what these anime licensing companies are worried about is that several of these fansub groups don't stop fansubbing EVEN after it gets licensed. even if that main groups stop fansubbing, new groups spawn up to continue the fansubbing where the original groups left off.

  43. Re:reporter needed to do a little bit more researc by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 1

    fansubbing is a gray area if it is anime that hasn't been licensed in the country you're living.

    No it's not.

    --
    -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
  44. Please DON'T follow ADV by semiazas · · Score: 3, Interesting

    At first, I thought nothing but good thoughts about ADV. They came onto the anime fan scene with promises of more translated anime at better prices and I believed them. They translated and resold some really good titles and all was well with the world.. Except....

    The fly in the ointment was the incomprehensible fact that subtitled tapes where consistently 33% more expensive than the dubbed alternatives. This, coming from a group that introduced themselves as the "anime by fans for fans" company, caused quite a few fans to question ADV's true motives. Requests, demands, and even (or especially) screaming demands for an explanation were often ignored completely. I sat in on several convention panels where, when asked point blank, ADV representatives would either carefully sidestep the issue completely, get angry and ignore it, or provide a ridiculous justification. The fact is there is simply NO WAY producing a subtitled translation cost more than a dubbed translation but ADV felt justified in gouging their "fans" because they knew they could get away with it.

    After being snubbed by ADV reps on the dealer room floor several times I decided to boycott ADV. Years passed, and the question became moot once DVDs became the media of choice. This coupled with ADV's penchant for snatching up every good title the moment they can and at the same time their search-and-destroy policy against fansubbers left me little choice but to try them out again. I was disappointed. Their subtitles left a lot to be desired, and their dubs where, with some exceptions, simply insipid. Paying $.50 to $1 a minute for anime that in many cases had been been partially fansubbed FOR FREE at a superior level of quality really rubbed me the wrong way. I watched series after series get snatched up by ADV, fansubs shut down left and right before completion, and then episodes parceled out at a rate often slower than that of its domestic release. The only conciliation in the entire mess was, if you were patient enough and willing to wait the literal years it took, ADV would eventually come around and release a box set of all the episodes, usually at a price per minute that made the purchase worthwhile. Until...

    ADV, in their marketing magnificence, introduced these collectors' kits. Wow, what a concept. Combine box sets with the necessity of purchasing individual episodes one disc at a time and bam, the best of both worlds. We keep the box set guys happy, AND, we rake in even more cash. Goodbye the old series collections, wherein, if the consumer is patient enough, the entire series is sold at a discounted rate per episode. Hello brand shiny sparkly NEW collections, and hey, we'll even throw in a $5 t-shirt for $20. Now, if you want the entire thing from ADV, you're forced to buy them one disc at a time for the full retail price, no breaks, no deals, daddie's gotta buy a brand new car and pay for that heated driveway.

    So I'm back to boycotting ADV, secure in the knowledge that if all else fails I can fall back on US Mangle or one of the other smaller commercial subbers now scurrying for scraps from ADV's table. Except, damn if they don't catch on and start doing the exact same damn thing that ADV started. The shelves are now riddled with "collector sets" that consist of large flimsy cardboard boxes filled to the brim with one disc and, if you're lucky, a shirt or some manga, or, if you're not, a neat and completely useless block of styrofoam.

    So I say, hats off to ADV, you guys are working your way into bankruptcy one marketing idea at a time. The entire industry is so bent on paying for those driveways that the ONLY source for quality subtitled anime is from the fans, where it's always been. With the exception of Pioneer who've been top notch with the few titles they've managed to wrest from ADV's clawing grasp.

  45. Bonus Point for "The" + Some Other Word by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

    The New York Times' Charles Solomon reports that 'ADV Films, the largest distributor of anime in the United States is releasing promotional packages via the BitTorrent.'

    Dammit! And I was hoping that maybe they would be pirating The REM and The Aerosmith!

  46. Re:reporter needed to do a little bit more researc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's not a grey area at all. Even before a title is licensed, it's still covered under international copyright law. And distributing copyright material without the owner's permission is illegal, whether or not you add subtitles to it.

  47. What are you talking about? by DeadScreenSky · · Score: 1

    Massively used how? Various studies have shown roughly a third of all internet traffic is bittorrent related. You simply aren't going to get much more massive than that!

    --
    There is no excellent beauty that hath not some strangeness in the proportion. -- Francis Bacon
  48. Re:reporter needed to do a little bit more researc by krunk4ever · · Score: 1

    by gray, i meant very dark gray. it's very well known that the anime/manga industries operate under different sets of rules.

    for example, most major manga artists start off by creating doujinshi. it's basically taking someone's copyrighted character and making up a side-story and (yes) selling it to fans. no one ever pursues these artists? why? because that's probably how 90% of all manga artists start out and the more doujinshi there exists, it just means the more popular the series is and it doesn't compete with them in direct sales.

    as the 2 of mentioned and you are correct that it is TECHNICALLY ILLEGAL to fansub. when I said it was a gray area, I meant companies don't bother pursuing them since there is actually a potential benefit that can come out of it and not very much harm if it hasn't been licensed yet.

  49. Sarcasm Alert by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

    Just like many articles don't address how ADV feels about VHS piracy, when they distribute VHS tapes. What shoddy journalism!

    1. Re:Sarcasm Alert by Halfbaked+Plan · · Score: 1

      Does ADV really freely distribute movie promos on VHS tape?

      --
      resigned
  50. Re:reporter needed to do a little bit more researc by RyuSoma · · Score: 1

    fansubbing is a gray area if it is anime that hasn't been licensed in the country you're living.

    No, it's not. The laws just haven't been enforced.

    when an anime is unlicensed in the states, japanese distributors have never told them to stop their work.

    No, also not true. Several Japanese production companies have sent cease&desists, polite emails or their directors have spoken out against it at conventions and in interviews.

    without these fansubbers bringing a popularity of these animes so high, i'd doubt that over half of what's available today would've been available.

    And this explains why ADV is cutting staff, titles and losing money. Licensing everything on the planet, bankrolling the production of new series themselves - which then turn out to be complete bombs.

  51. What Next? by shish · · Score: 1
    Any ETA on when I can expect a ~$2 per episode, download on demand, high quality torrent of series, each episode released within a couple of days of being aired in japan?

    I've become quite used to the speed, convenience, and quality of fansubs -- if the anime companies can be faster, more convenient (eg legal), or higher quality, I'd be only too willing to pay for them.

    Come to think of it, what would the problem be with a company like ADV simply buying out a fansub group, getting them to do everything as they normally do, just adding an "official" badge and a price tag?

    --
    I mod down anyone who says "I will be modded down for this", regardless of the rest of their comment
  52. Re:reporter needed to do a little bit more researc by krunk4ever · · Score: 1

    No, also not true. Several Japanese production companies have sent cease&desists, polite emails or their directors have spoken out against it at conventions and in interviews.

    i may have exaggerated a bit by using the word "never", but companies have also came out and spoke out at conventions thanking the fansubber community for bringing interest for particular series globally. and most of the time, companies either don't care or actually support fansubbing.

    And this explains why ADV is cutting staff, titles and losing money. Licensing everything on the planet, bankrolling the production of new series themselves - which then turn out to be complete bombs.

    there can be a lot of reasons for this. ADV provides sub-quality dubs and translations and people would actually rather buy the RAWs from Japan than to purchase ADV DVDs. ADV is infamous for butchering animes they pick up that's why when a good series gets licensed by ADV, everyone pounds their head. as you said, they license everything on the planet, taking a plate full of more than they can handle which you can tell with their "finished" products.

  53. The Godannar promotional link by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I noticed the Godannar torrent link was posted over at www.animeondvd.com. The article didn't give out the link so though I'd put it here for anyone interested.

    http://216.136.62.222/torrents/Godannar.torrent