Slashdot Mirror


X-15 Pilots Finally Get Astronaut Wings

Ginnungagap42 writes "NASA has a story about pilots Bill Dana, John McKay and Joe Walker finally receiving their astronauts wings for their work in the X-15 program back in the 1960's. Astronauts wings were awarded to the USAF personnel in the 1960's, but not to the civilian NASA pilots until now. The X-15 program was an important testbed for hypersonic flight. It's nice that all the pilots who flew high and fast are finally being recognized."

143 comments

  1. Today on Oxymoron Theatre: by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 5, Interesting


    I read this story this morning on SpaceRef, and I was struck with the absurdity of the concept of "astronaut wings", since wings are less than useful in a vacuum. Still, I suppose that there's a great deal of precedent for the "wings" decoration...it's interesting to speculate on whether or not the nomenclature will eventually be shifted to more accurately reflect the current level of technological development (the 'order of the silver booster', or some such). It's equally possible that the nomenclature will never be altered, out of a respect for tradition and a nostalgia for the good old days...it's conceiveable that in the future, an astronaut living on a space station could be award "wings" for some accomplishment of other, having never travelled in an atmosphere himself.

    Good to see these pilots get their props for their contributions, though, even if it is posthumously in the cases of John McKay and Joseph Walker, and even if surviving pilot Bill Dana seems unimpressed by the whole affair.

    --
    ____

    ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    1. Re:Today on Oxymoron Theatre: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      even if surviving pilot Bill Dana seems unimpressed by the whole affair.

      Had I been as high as him, I doubt I would care much of those wings either... he knows he was there, he saw it, and it must've some been very, very beautiful scenery.

    2. Re:Today on Oxymoron Theatre: by mmkkbb · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually, props aren't very useful in space, for the same reason that wings aren't. /gets coat

      --
      -mkb
    3. Re:Today on Oxymoron Theatre: by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      If they never traveled in an atmosphere I think getting wings would be the least of their problems since it may have been hard for them to breathe without one.

    4. Re:Today on Oxymoron Theatre: by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Wings might be useful in space. It is possible to imagine a solar sail that looked a lot like a set of wings, and could be used for navigation within a solar system.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    5. Re:Today on Oxymoron Theatre: by mnmn · · Score: 1

      " an astronaut living on a space station could be award "wings" for some accomplishment of other, having never travelled in an atmosphere himself."

      He'd have to travel through the atmosphere, and quite spectacularly, to GET to space.

      Apart from wings, its a strong symbol and very american at that too. What do you want? Buzz Aldrin gets his Exhaust Tail? Neil Armstrong gets his Nosecone?

      'Wings' give you the ability to fly, to leave the ground and go far above; conceptually. I wonder if space elevator travellers will be able to get their 'wings' or their pilots license; probably not.

      --
      "Give orange me give eat orange me eat orange give me eat orange give me you." -Nim Chimpsky
    6. Re:Today on Oxymoron Theatre: by Shakes268 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Do you think you could be any more anal? To pick apart the decoration in such a way as you have shows that you either have too much time on your hands or just like to argue about things to "prove" you're smarter than those around you. Sure I might get modded as a troll but wow! There are more important things in life than worrying about whether astronaughts should get a wing decoration or not. They are pilots - they fly. Definition of fly could be debated in your terms of thinking however I think the term stil applies - even though it might not be conventional aerodynamics using lift, drag, and airfoils.

    7. Re:Today on Oxymoron Theatre: by uncqual · · Score: 1
      He'd have to travel through the atmosphere, and quite spectacularly, to GET to space.

      I think the point was that one born in space would not have had to (at least not as a multicelled entity with all the usual human characteristics).

      --
      Why is there an "insightful" mod and why isn't it "-1"? If I wanted insight, I wouldn't be reading /.
    8. Re:Today on Oxymoron Theatre: by Fishstick · · Score: 2, Informative

      Do you still 'dial' a phone number (or wait for the 'dial tone' first)? When what the last time (if ever) you used a rotarty dial telephone?

      I'm sure there a are lots of other/better examples, but the point is once a word or phrase gets some level of common use it gains a certain amount of social inertia. Even though the technology changes and the term is log obsolete, it is hard to think of substituting a different word.

      I can't ever imagine saying:

      "Hold on while I touch-tone his cell."

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    9. Re:Today on Oxymoron Theatre: by dotwaffle · · Score: 1

      You'd probably get awarded your SRB's or something... No wings on a spacecraft. Well, apart from a Shuttle. And technically that's a wing, not wings... Oh come on, I must have typed past the 20 seconds limit by now...

    10. Re:Today on Oxymoron Theatre: by lgw · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I remember the days of the rotary dial. Forgotten today is the status associated with the numbers in your prefix. Higher numbers took longer to dial, so having low numbers in your prefix (especially for a business) was important, and everyone in a neighborhood would generally have the ame prefix. My prefix, of course, was 599, and it took forever to dial.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    11. Re:Today on Oxymoron Theatre: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was struck with the absurdity of the concept of "astronaut wings", since wings are less than useful in a vacuum.

      /rolleyes

      So I guess we should change the stars on the US flag to something else then right? I mean, since the states are on the ground and not in the sky?

      I guess the concept of a symbol is too complicated for some people, especially if the relationship between the symbol and what it represents is abstract.

    12. Re:Today on Oxymoron Theatre: by hcob$ · · Score: 1
      I read this story this morning on SpaceRef, and I was struck with the absurdity of the concept of "astronaut wings", since wings are less than useful in a vacuum. Still, I suppose that there's a great deal of precedent for the "wings" decoration...it's interesting to speculate on whether or not the nomenclature will eventually be shifted to more accurately reflect the current level of technological development (the 'order of the silver booster', or some such). It's equally possible that the nomenclature will never be altered, out of a respect for tradition and a nostalgia for the good old days...it's conceiveable that in the future, an astronaut living on a space station could be award "wings" for some accomplishment of other, having never travelled in an atmosphere himself.

      Good to see these pilots get their props for their contributions, though, even if it is posthumously in the cases of John McKay and Joseph Walker, and even if surviving pilot Bill Dana seems unimpressed by the whole affair.

      **begin cpt. obvious**

      OR it could be that they are wings since they are pilots that happened to actually reach space......

      **end cpt. obvious**
      --
      Cliff Claven
      K.E.G. Party Chairman
      Founding Leader of: Koncerned for Egalitarin Governance
    13. Re:Today on Oxymoron Theatre: by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 1


      Do you think you could be any more anal?

      Do you think you could be any more ignorant?

      To pick apart the decoration in such a way as you have

      It's a shame you didn't actually read my OP...if you had, you might have noticed that I was attempting to initiate a discussion on the topic (emphasis on might), rather than just 'picking apart' the decoration.

      you either have too much time on your hands or just like to argue about things to "prove" you're smarter than those around you.

      Well...I had the time to try to start a discusion about the symbolism of the wings award...just like you had the time to tragically misinterpret it and foam at the mouth for six sentences. As for me liking to argue about things, guilty as charged...only I prefer to call it 'discussion', That may be the reason why I frequest this discussion board...what's your excuse? As for "proving" I'm smarter than those around me, please see below:

      There are more important things in life than worrying about whether astronaughts should get a wing decoration or not.

      *Sigh*

      --
      ____

      ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

    14. Re:Today on Oxymoron Theatre: by navyjeff · · Score: 1

      ..it's interesting to speculate on whether or not the nomenclature will eventually be shifted to more accurately reflect the current level of technological development (the 'order of the silver booster', or some such).

      I think a booster rocket pin would be a little too phallic, much like the Submarine Deterrent Patrol pin is. http://www.nationmaster.com/encyclopedia/SSBN-Dete rrent-Patrol-insignia

    15. Re:Today on Oxymoron Theatre: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      If you're posting on /., you have too much time on your hands. ;)

      When spaceplanes are in common use, everybody will have astronaut wings. Bragging about earning your astronaut wings will be equivalent to bragging about buying a new toothbrush. BFD.

      i-ight, nigga gone.

    16. Re:Today on Oxymoron Theatre: by Shakes268 · · Score: 0

      frequest *Sigh* See how easy it is? I'm glad you feel as though it was a discussion but on the lines of your "discussion", let's change the term Space Flight. Space.com would have to change all of their links though so that might not be a good idea.

    17. Re:Today on Oxymoron Theatre: by scatters · · Score: 1

      'Wings' are symbolic of man's desire to 'slip the surly bonds of earth', rather than the means by which it is done. Thus, I don't think that the wings symbol will become an anachronism.

      --
      A One that isn't cold, is scarcely a One at all.
    18. Re:Today on Oxymoron Theatre: by kbnesso · · Score: 1

      Good for the guys who flew ( and flew a "Spaceship" that does not fall apart, burn up or shed little pieces of itself constantly....). I find this all so reminiscent of "Space Cowboys" (Clint Eastwood, James Garner, Tommy Lee Jones, Donald Sutherland), where they were essentially these people fictionalized. In the end they saved NASA's ass and resluctantly get their wings. Wonder who had to cattle-prod NASA to do something right?

    19. Re:Today on Oxymoron Theatre: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I remember talking to Bill Dana in 1980's (am I getting that old? ;) ) at Edwards AFB when I was getting into Test Pilot School and he saying that he would like to have them but remembering Joe Walker to died in the F-106 crash and John McKay which died of liver failure from the an X-15 crash he would have like to have them get it also.
      But it is better late than never.

    20. Re:Today on Oxymoron Theatre: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some sort of phallic symbol may be more appropriate, especially for naval aviators.

  2. Tom Wolfe mentioned this by Mark+of+THE+CITY · · Score: 5, Informative

    In "The Right Stuff," Wolfe mentioned that the NASA X-15 pilots didn't qualify for astronaut wings. Supposedly, a party was held for one of them after his qualifying flight. He was a pair of cardboard wings labelled "Asstronaut."

    --
    The clearance system sounds logical. It is not. It is completely arbitrary. -- John Bolton
    1. Re:Tom Wolfe mentioned this by markild · · Score: 1

      I see... So that's what it takes!

      Note to self:
      - Buy cardboard
      - Buy pen
      - Notify press

      --
      Scully: Should we arrest David Copperfield?
      Mulder: Yes we should, but not for this.
    2. Re:Tom Wolfe mentioned this by Mark+of+THE+CITY · · Score: 1

      It's not a typo. Look it up in the book.

      --
      The clearance system sounds logical. It is not. It is completely arbitrary. -- John Bolton
    3. Re:Tom Wolfe mentioned this by spencerogden · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Also see this book for a great discussion of what makes a pilot. We're the Astronauts pilots even though a monkey made thier flights first? Not to say that doesn't make them brave, but there was certainly a lack of control.

      Compare this with the work being done on the X-15 and centruy series rocket planes. No computer assist, full pilot controled flight to the edge of space and back. Serious Cajones there.

    4. Re:Tom Wolfe mentioned this by Moofie · · Score: 1

      "We're the Astronauts pilots even though a monkey made thier flights first"

      Huh?

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    5. Re:Tom Wolfe mentioned this by lgw · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Astronauts didn't actually do much in early rocketry, almost everyhting was ground-controlled (obviously the X planes were the reverse). The only reason the early manned rockets even had controls (allowing the astronauts to call themselves "pilots") was that the astronauts demanded it, however pointlessly, and were important enough to the PR side of NASA to get what they wanted. More self-loading PR material than pilots. Heck, the same thing is almost certainly true for why the shuttle is piloted for the last 2-3 minutes of landing.

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    6. Re:Tom Wolfe mentioned this by Moofie · · Score: 1

      I've got a handle on the history, thanks. I'm trying to parse the sentence, and it's not working.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    7. Re:Tom Wolfe mentioned this by lgw · · Score: 1

      Other readers, who aren't rocket scientists, might be confused by more than the spelling, however. :)

      --
      Socialism: a lie told by totalitarians and believed by fools.
    8. Re:Tom Wolfe mentioned this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cajones = drawers (as in desk drawers) Cojones = balls (as in testicles)

    9. Re:Tom Wolfe mentioned this by nobodyzhome · · Score: 1
      Translated: Even though the early flights were made by monkeys, because the rockets, etc... were that easy to "pilot", were the early (Human) Astronauts considered pilots?

      I think you've always had to be a pilot to be an Astronaut. The monkey, on the other hand, was just in the wrong place at the wrong time. (What're the signs for WTF? and Oh, SHIT!?)

    10. Re:Tom Wolfe mentioned this by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1
      In "The Right Stuff," Wolfe mentioned that the NASA X-15 pilots didn't qualify for astronaut wings.
      When asked about it, Chuck Yeager said that he didn't believe in test pilots having "the right stuff"... (Maybe he has the proper thing)...
      Also see this book for a great discussion of what makes a pilot. We're the Astronauts pilots even though a monkey made thier flights first? Not to say that doesn't make them brave, but there was certainly a lack of control.
      They actually complained about being " Spam in the can "...
    11. Re:Tom Wolfe mentioned this by milkman_matt · · Score: 1

      Other readers, who aren't rocket scientists, might be confused by more than the spelling, however. :)

      I dunno, there's one around here who even had it in his sig, haven't heard him chime in on any of the recent rocket-science related stories though, would be interesting to get his views on some of 'em too!

  3. Space Ship One Virgin by saskboy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Space Ship One's private citizen pilot(s?) got his wings, or at least that's what CNN reported.
    http://www.cnn.com/2004/TECH/space/10/04/spaceship one.attempt.cnn/

    "Binnie, now only the second person in history to earn his commercial astronaut wings, reported a shaky flight with "a little roll" but did not experience the 29 rolls Mike Melvill experienced last week."

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    1. Re:Space Ship One Virgin by Trick · · Score: 1

      Those would be figurative wings, not literal ones.

      Last I checked, NASA didn't hand out any *commercial* wings.

    2. Re:Space Ship One Virgin by Richard_at_work · · Score: 2, Informative
      No, they were actually presented to both the SS1 pilots after the flights. I distinctly remember a photo of Melville being presented his by a FAA representative.

      From the FAA:

      The FAA's Associate Administrator, Patti Grace Smith, presented Mr. Melville with the first FAA-issued commercial astronaut wings. A few short months later, on October 4 th, I had the privilege of awarding the next set of wings to Astronaut Brian Binnie.
    3. Re:Space Ship One Virgin by databyss · · Score: 1

      Those were awarded by the FAA, not NASA.

      --
      Hmmm witty sig or funny sig? Maybe elitest techy sig!
  4. About time by BrentRJones · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Those guys risk their lives more than any current astronauts. I recall putting together a plastic model of the X-15 in 1958. I was in second grade and very, very keen on the space program. I still am, but think that robots should be used much more now.

    --
    Help end the use of Sigs. Tomorrow
    1. Re:About time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      Still in second grade after 47 years? Don't you think it might be time to just give up? :-)

    2. Re:About time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, I remember seeing a real, X-15 when I was in my early teens. They brought it by ETSU(now TAMU Commerce) on tour and displayed it beside the old student center. Everyone back then put together model x-15's. The real thing was a whole different dimension. One hulking midnight blue dangerous looking piece of machinery!

      Jim B.

    3. Re:About time by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 1

      Then you remember seeing the one that broke in half when the nose wheel touched down. I think of that every time I watch the Shuttle land.

      --
      No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    4. Re:About time by fijimf · · Score: 1
      Those guys risk their lives more than any current astronauts.
      According to this site http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/air craft/x.htm all of the X programs over the past 50+ years were responsible for only 4 fatalities. Substantially fewer than the Space Shuttle, over a longer period of time.
  5. Congrats! by NetNinja · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I guess this had to happen since the civilian pilot who went up into space to claim the X-Prize was awarded his astronaut wings.

    1. Re:Congrats! by databyss · · Score: 2, Informative

      Those guys were awarded their wings from the FAA, not NASA.

      Whole different story there.

      --
      Hmmm witty sig or funny sig? Maybe elitest techy sig!
  6. Just like space ship one by evenprime · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It makes sense. They were in a winged, rocket powered craft that was dropped from an airplane. If they actually got to the same height as the guys from Scaled Composites, they deserve the same astronaut wings.

    --

    "Weapons should be hardy rather than decorative" - Miyamoto Musashi
    I think that goes for OS's too
    1. Re:Just like space ship one by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      Actually the went higher and MUCH MUCH faster than the guys from Scaled Composites did.
      Just to put it all into perspective. X-15 what NASA could do with late 50's tech.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    2. Re:Just like space ship one by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

      Why are there three sets of wings being issued when only two X-15 flights broke the 100KM height requirement for 'space'? The two flights being 90 and 91, the nearest other flight being flight 62 at 95.9KM.

    3. Re:Just like space ship one by Tango42 · · Score: 1

      The US definition of space is 50miles, not 100kms... they really should change to match everyone else, but they haven't so far. Apparently there were 13 flights in to US space, but just 2 into "real" space.

    4. Re:Just like space ship one by Tango42 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The highest X-15 was 108km, SpaceShipOne reached 112km... 112>108 last time I checked.

    5. Re:Just like space ship one by gstoddart · · Score: 1
      The highest X-15 was 108km, SpaceShipOne reached 112km... 112>108 last time I checked.

      Only for sufficiently large values of 112. :-P
      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
    6. Re:Just like space ship one by Rei · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not like it matters. 90% of the energy of a LEO orbit is horizontal, not vertical. SS1's up-and-down flight record belies the fact that it had almost no orbital energy. X-15 went 2/7ths of the necessary velocity for orbit, on 1950s tech.

      Heck, even the V-2 had a greater payload (probably about twice SS1's cockpit, at 1000 kg) twice the delta-V, compared to SS1. And we're talking about the birth of modern rocketry there.

      --
      Are there any deer in the theater tonight? Get 'em up against the wall.
    7. Re:Just like space ship one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn those crazy Americans! How dare they use an approximate figure that happens to be round in their system of units, instead the approximate figure that's round in our system of units! Don't they know this stuff is supposed to be decided by committee? Of course, the exact value is mostly academic and figures not at all into any calculations or anything necessary to conduct space flight, but damn them anyway!

      I mean, really! How can they go and call these American assholes "astronauts"? They only went up 96 km! I can spit that high!

    8. Re:Just like space ship one by Tango42 · · Score: 1

      Of course, but that wasn't the question.

    9. Re:Just like space ship one by Tango42 · · Score: 1

      The 100km figure was decided because it was where an orbitting craft would have insufficent atmospheric lift to maintain its altitude - it's where aerodynamics stopped working and orbital mechanics comes into play. The exact value is pretty close to 100km, I don't think it's pretty close to 50mi (80km) although I'm not sure of the exact value. I don't know where the 50mi value came from - if you do, I'd be interested to know.

      For more information, see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Karman_line

    10. Re:Just like space ship one by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 1
      SS1's up-and-down flight record belies the fact that it had almost no orbital energy.
      Oh, it has plenty of orbital energy; the problem is that a significant portion of the orbit is below the Earth surface...
    11. Re:Just like space ship one by Rei · · Score: 1

      Most people around here won't appreciate that joke, but I got a good laugh out of it. ;) Now we just need to simplify the Earth to a point mass...

      --
      Are there any deer in the theater tonight? Get 'em up against the wall.
  7. Wings in the distant future... by protolith · · Score: 2, Interesting


    I would expect that "wings" will still be wings even in the distant future of space travel. The award ceremony will just contain an explanation of the symbolic significance of "wings".

    1. Re:Wings in the distant future... by HardCase · · Score: 1

      I agree - when I became surface warfare qualified in the US Navy, I received my "water wings" - the insignia is crossed cutlasses behind the bow of a battleship. Cutlasses??? And, for that matter, a battleship???

      It's all symbolism.

      -h-

  8. joe walker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    just FYI I dont know about the first two test pilots but joe walker died in a jet crash in like the late 60's or early 70's. In fact my middle schools name was joe walker in honor of his life since he died while the school was being built or just after it was built (sorry its been a long time since middle school heh). It was pretty cool because I was actually doing a research project on him for the school website and I actually remember we found an old 8mm in the school attic of 'this is your life... joe walker'

    1. Re:joe walker by p51d007 · · Score: 1

      Joe Walker was a great test pilot, but on a "publicity" stunt involving several general electric equipped aircraft his plane (they think) was sucked into the tail of the XB-70 Valkerie, and was destroyed. The Valkerie lumbered on for a little bit, rolled over and dived into the desert, killing one of the two pilots, who was unable to eject. Someone on Google Earth's BBS said that there are still pieces of the Valkerie in the desert.

    2. Re:joe walker by aevan · · Score: 1

      Don't know the veracity of this, but it does detail what you were saying: http://www.check-six.com/Crash_Sites/XB-70_crash_s ite.htm

    3. Re:joe walker by afidel · · Score: 1

      The XB-70 is a VERY impressive plane, the sheer size of the thing makes it hard to fathom that it is capable of Mach 3, until you walk to the back and see the array of huge engines =) That plane alone is enough reason to go to Wright Patterson IMO.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  9. If Bill Dana got wings ... by TheCrig · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... then what about Jose Jimenez?

    --
    -- Jim Crigler In 1937, I began, like Lazarus, the impossible return. -- Whittaker Chambers
    1. Re:If Bill Dana got wings ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was going to say that!

      I'm old, too.

    2. Re:If Bill Dana got wings ... by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      I was wondering about his brother, Dennis Jimenez.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    3. Re:If Bill Dana got wings ... by gregor-e · · Score: 1

      Dude, he got more than wings - he got a record deal.

    4. Re:If Bill Dana got wings ... by Kozar_The_Malignant · · Score: 1

      Wasn't that Jose Jimenez? Certainly the astronaut with the most appearances on the Ed Sullivan Show.

      --
      Some mornings it's hardly worth chewing through the restraints to get out of bed.
    5. Re:If Bill Dana got wings ... by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      Yes, but Jose Jimenez was played by Bill Dana.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    6. Re:If Bill Dana got wings ... by trailerparkcassanova · · Score: 1

      Oh I hope not....

  10. NASA Page for X-15 by kevin_conaway · · Score: 1, Informative

    Here is the NASA page that contains background info on the X-15 for anyone interested.

    1. Re:NASA Page for X-15 by PWatson · · Score: 5, Informative

      Uhh, the link seems to be missing. Therefore, here are the NASA and Wikipedia links to X-15 articles for your reading enjoyment.

      --
      Does your application handle + characters in e-mail addresses? (RFC2822)
  11. Re:Space Ship One Virgin: Retraction by Trick · · Score: 2, Informative

    Well, whaddayaknow? CNN's wording was a bit strange on that one. I checked to see if I was making an ass out of myself, and I was. The two SpaceShip One pilots *did* receive astronaut wings.

    Yummy. Foot.

  12. But think by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But think, now that these astronauts have wings, they can fly over enemy territory and drop bombs.

  13. About time... by Junior+J.+Junior+III · · Score: 5, Funny

    The X-15 pilots were moving so fast, it took the medals and awards bureau 35 years to catch up with them.

    --
    You see? You see? Your stupid minds! Stupid! Stupid!
    1. Re:About time... by Rei · · Score: 1

      Time dilation will do that to you. :)

      --
      Are there any deer in the theater tonight? Get 'em up against the wall.
  14. Obligatory Wikipedia Link by N8F8 · · Score: 0, Redundant
    --
    "God fights on the side with the best artillery." - Napoleon, Marshal of France - speaking truth to power
  15. "I want my crayons" ???? Bill Dana??? by dpbsmith · · Score: 1

    I could have sworn Bill Dana was the name of acomedian who appeared from time to time on the Ed Sullivan show in the late 1950s/early 1960s, in sketches about "the reluctant astronaut." The catchphrase was him bawling out "I want my crayons!"

    Evidently my mind has turned to middle-aged mush.

    What was that comedian's name?

    1. Re:"I want my crayons" ???? Bill Dana??? by Brett+Buck · · Score: 1

      Two different people with the same name. It happens.

  16. Wings...... by Roskolnikov · · Score: 1

    Some day in the far distant future I can imagine wings being given to astronauts who have dared to take their space craft into an atmosphere, until that day this does seem to be an inappropriate thing to give a pilot for leaving the atmosphere.......

    Either way its good to see NASA stepping up after awarding basically the same thing to the first 'privately funded' astronaut.

    --
    Unix, an obscure operating system developed by bored researchers in an attempt to get a better game playing experience.
    1. Re:Wings...... by William-Ely · · Score: 1

      Well for one thing wings probably make a better looking pin than an oxygen tank.

      --
      Mod me down with all of your hatred, and your journey towards the dark side will be complete!
  17. Estes by Colin+E.+McDonald · · Score: 1

    I piloted my X-15 Estes Rocket Model when I was 12....Where are my wings at!?!?!?!?

  18. feather wings? Re:Today on Oxymoron Theatre: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Anyway, the wings in the decorations are feathered ones, not very usefull to fly with planes also, so if "wings" is just an agreed symbol about flying it doesn't matter if it makes sense for non-atmosferic fly.

  19. A little OT: by RPI+Geek · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In his book," Sled Driver," SR- 71/ Blackbird pilot Brian Shul writes:

    I'll always remember a certain radio exchange that occurred one day as Walt (my backseater) and I were screaming across Southern California 13 miles high. We were monitoring various radio transmissions from other aircraft as we entered Los Angeles airspace. Though they didn't really control us, they did monitor our movement across their scope. I heard a Cessna ask for a readout of its groundspeed. "90 knots" Center replied. Moments later, a Twin Beech required the same. "120 knots," Center answered. We weren't the only ones proud of our groundspeed that day as almost instantly an F-18 smugly transmitted, "Ah, Center, Dusty 52 requests groundspeed readout." There was a slight pause, then the response, "525 knots on the ground, Dusty." Another silent pause. As I was thinking to myself how ripe a situation this was, I heard a familiar click of a radio transmission coming from my backseater. It was at that precise moment I realized Walt and I had become a real crew, for we were both thinking in unison. "Center, Aspen 20, you got a groundspeed readout for us?" There was a longer than normal pause.... "Aspen, I show 1,742 knots." No further inquiries were heard on that frequency.

    In another famous SR-71 story, Los Angeles Center reported receiving a request for clearance to FL 60 (60,000ft).
    The incredulous controller, with some disdain in his voice, asked, "How do you plan to get up to 60,000 feet?
    The pilot (obviously a sled driver), responded, " We don't plan to go up to it, we plan to come down to it..."
    He was cleared...

    --

    - "Nobody came out that night, not one was ever seen. But Old Man Stauf is waiting there, crazy sick and mean!"
    1. Re:A little OT: by chl · · Score: 4, Informative
      Funny stories. Just a little nitpick: 60000ft would be flight level (FL) 600. The lowest flight level is FL180, which is at a pressure altitude of 18000ft, which in standard atmospheric conditions is 18000ft above sea level. Pressure altitude is the altitude inferred from the ambient pressure. It coincides with the real altitude only at standard atmospheric conditions, i.e. no high, no lows, no hot or cold day.

      This means that, if pressure or temperature are lower than standard, the flight levels come down accordingly, so FL180 could actually be *below* 17500ft. Consequently, FL180 to FL185 are not used on those days.

      Below 18000ft, pressure altitude is usually corrected for non-standard pressure, and that corrected value is shown on the altimeter. This makes it easier to find your altitude above ground level, which is important for clearing obstacles and landing at airports, whose elevations are given in "real" ft above mean sea level. At higher altitudes, these ground problems are not so relevant, and the flight level scale is used.

      chl

    2. Re:A little OT: by willith · · Score: 3, Funny

      Another anecdote along those lines, related by Lt. Colonel William Burk Jr. in Ben Rich's memoirs:

      In the fall of '82, I flew from Mildenhall on a mission to Lebanon in response to the Marine barrack bombing. President Reagan ordered photo coverage of ill the terrorist bases in the region. The French refused to allow us to overfly, so our mission was to refuel off the south coast of England....

      We completed our pass over Beirut and turned toward Malta, when I got a warning low-oil-pressure light on my right engine. Even though the engine was running fine I slowed down and lowered our altitude and made a direct line for England. We decided to cross France without clearance instead of going the roundabout way. We made it almost across, when I looked out the left window and saw a French Mirage III sitting ten feet off my left wing. He came up on our frequency and asked us for our Diplomatic Clearance Number. I had no idea what he was talking about, so I told him to stand by. I asked my backseater, who said, "Don't worry about it. I just gave it to him." What he had given him was "the bird' with his middle finger. I lit the afterbumers and left that Mirage standing still. Two minutes later, we were crossing the Channel.

    3. Re:A little OT: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > The lowest flight level is FL180
      With qualification - the lowest FL *in the US* is FL180. In the UK, flight levels regularly extend down to FL100 and even, on occasion, FL80. Just letting you know...

    4. Re:A little OT: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have a copy of "Sled Driver?" May I borrow it?

    5. Re:A little OT: by JimPooley · · Score: 1

      The transition layer where you switch from using altitude (based on the mean sea level pressure at the aerodrome, or lowest regional mean sea level pressure if using a regional QNH) to using flight levels (altimeter set to 1013mb or 1013hPa or 29.92inMg) in the UK is from 3000ft to 3500 ft. So the lowest flight level available is FL35.
      Technically, due to airspace limitations, the lowest one I've ever been able to use is FL55, and I had to go quite a way from base to use that.

      That's the UK version, anyway.

      --

      "Information wants to be paid"
    6. Re:A little OT: by chl · · Score: 1
      Mea culpa. As I kept adding more and more specific information to the post, I forgot I was only talking about the US. I will need to find out about those differences when I go back to Germany;-)

      chl

  20. Bill Dana by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Bill was a groundman for my grandfather, Einar, when they were spin-testing the F-14. They jointly invented a difficult manoeuvre to escape from a frisbee-like uncontrolled highly stable spin that had caused several F-14s to crash. It's fantastic to see that Bill Dana is finally getting his wings.

    1. Re:Bill Dana by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its called an Inverted Flat Spin.

      Also quit bullshitting, there is no difficult maneuver to pull your aircraft out of such a spin. Especially not with the power to weight ratio of the F-14. Even in the early 1980s it was basic knowledge imparted to whelplings in flight school.

      General Characteristics:
      Overall Length: 62 feet 9 inches (18.9 meters)
      Wingspan: 64 feet (19 meters) unswept; 38 feet (11.4 meters) swept
      Height: 16 feet (4.8 meters)
      Weight: 43,600 lb (19,777 kg) (F-14B)
      Speed: Mach 2+
      Ceiling: 50,000+ feet
      Range: 1600 nm
      Power Plants:
      F-14A: (2) TF30-414A Afterburning Turbofans with over 40,000 lb Total Thrust
      F-14B/D: (2) F110-GE400 Afterburning Turbofans with over 54,000 lb Total Thrust

      I'm sure he's had an exceptional career etc etc, and that you enjoyed putting together your grandpa's wikipedia entry. But I doubt anyone is going to be looking at that again after today.

  21. Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's great. This has been bugging me for years.

  22. Jose Jimenez by wsanders · · Score: 1

    The reluctant astronaut. Too un-PC to be seen these days. That Bill Dana is still out and about making the occasional standup appearance.

    "What will you do if you're lost in space?"
    "I plan to cry a lot!"

    --
    Give a man a fish and you have fed him for today. Teach a man to fish, and he'll say "WHERE'S MY FISH, YOU IDIOT?"
    1. Re:Jose Jimenez by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Laugh.com -- Bill Dana

      Wikipedia -- Bill Dana


      "Is that a crash helmet?"
      "I hope not."

    2. Re:Jose Jimenez by hachete · · Score: 1

      Joese Jimenez makes an appearance in the film of "The Right Stuff". One of the astronauts used to imitate said comedian.

      --
      Patriotism is a virtue of the vicious
  23. It's a shame by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Fastest Man On Earth(TM) couldn't be here to accept his wings (rightfully deserved at that).

    He flew the X-15 at 7,274 KM/hr, or Mach 6.7 to get some real grasp on that speed, as well as at an altitude greater than 50 miles, or 80 KM.

    The X-15 crew had to complete the astronaut training curriculum in order to fly the X-15, but that's beside the qualification required to recieve an Astronaut Wing, that being flying in space at an altitude greater than 50 miles, or 80 KM.

    Highlight of his X-15 (stolen from wikipedia):
    He had more than his share of eventful flights in the X-15. While climbing through 107,000 feet at Mach 4.17 on June 29, 1967, he suffered a total electrical failure and all onboard systems shutdown. After arching over at 173,000 feet, he calmly set up a visual approach and, resorting to old-fashioned "seat-of-the-pants" flying, he glided down to a safe emergency landing at Mud Lake, Nevada. For his remarkable feat of airmanship that day, he earned a Distinguished Flying Cross.

    On October 3, 1967, Knight set a world aircraft speed record by piloting the X-15A-2 to 4,520 miles per hour (Mach 6.7) -- a record that still stands today. During 16 flights in the aircraft, Knight also became one of only five pilots to earn their astronaut's wings by flying an airplane in space, reaching an altitude of 280,500 feet.

    1. Re:It's a shame by Tiger4 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Pete Knight was kind of an a$$hole in other aspects of life [see below], but he was a heck of a pilot. I saw him at the 50th anniversary of the Air Force and 50th anniversary of breaking the sound barrier celebration at Edwards in October 1997. His record flight was in October 1967, making it the 30th anniversary. I asked him about it. He said the celebration organizers didn't think it was significant enough to recognize at the same event. I definitely felt kind of bad for him at that point. It isn't easy flying an aircraft that is trying to melt.

      WRT the other aspects, Knight went into local politics and eventually went to the California state Senate. He sided with the conservative Republicans, but was mean even by their standards. At one point he was caught handling out flyers with a "funny" poem about wetback Mexican women on the Senate floor. Another time he sponsored some anti-gay legislation. It passed, but ended up being made totally toothless in practice.

      --
      Behold, this dreamer cometh. Come now, and let us slay him... and we shall see what will become of his dreams.
  24. Re:Waste of money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (diggs into bag of Trollchow(tm) bones)

    Because we have more than enough bullets to take out radicals, we have pleanty of money, and they deserve them.

    (tosses Trollchow(tm) bone over shoulder while walking away)

  25. Elite wings by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Well, also in the legenday game of Elite did you earn your wings, of the space avian.

    You can find some of the wings here.

    So click the mous.

  26. Joe Walker by Mark+of+THE+CITY · · Score: 1

    That accident was in 1966.

    --
    The clearance system sounds logical. It is not. It is completely arbitrary. -- John Bolton
  27. Why should they care about wings. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    even if surviving pilot Bill Dana seems unimpressed by the whole affair.

    These guys got plenty of recognition and admiration of their peers, which matters a whole lot more than these wings ever do. Wings is just a PR-opportunity for politicians; and really benifits the guy handing out the wings far more than the guy getting them.

    If you wanted to recognise their talents; give them a position of leadership and authority within nasa - or if their talents are no longer useful give them a bonus retroactively.

    This reminds me of dot-coms when the money ran dry giving out "special tee-shirts" instead of raises to try to "help morale".

    1. Re:Why should they care about wings. by taniwha · · Score: 1

      Come on - read the article maybe - or just know a little history - this is the real "the right stuff" these guys did this 40 years ago - they're retired, in their 60s and 70s.

    2. Re:Why should they care about wings. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I think you misunderstand me.

      I certainly respect their accomplishments. I certainly am sure their peers respect their accomplishments.

      But giving some token to them after half of them is dead is almost condescending. Perhaps some new decoration to honor their unique accomplishments, or something. Of course I think it's nice that they get wings too; but to make it sound like being given wings is newsworthy or something that should make them happy is overstating the importance of wings.

  28. Re:Where are the penis fish? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I believe the last known living specimen of the Penis Fish is otherwise known as Jeff Gannon.

  29. Helicopter, submarines, cars by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 1

    Helicopter pilots gets wings. Yet only an aerodynamicist would quibble about rotor blades being wings. Certainly the general public thinks of rotor blades as rotors, not wings. "Look ma, no wings!"

    Submarines have diving planes which are actually wings. But they don't get wing pins, they get dolphins.

    Cars have wings. Everyone calls them wings. But they don't fly.

    1. Re:Helicopter, submarines, cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hence the term "waxing your dolphin"...

  30. YOU ARE MY HERO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Therefore, how wise is it to spend millions protecting it against hand-carried bombs and slashdotting?

    ell oh ell

  31. no stranger than dolphin pins by spicydragonz · · Score: 1

    This is no sillier than submariners getting dolpin pins. I don't think that just because you passed sub training you are now an orca. The pin is a symbol of an acomplishment or a communion.

  32. very, very beautiful scenery... by da5idnetlimit.com · · Score: 2, Funny

    zipping past at very, very high speed.

    "Dana flew the X-15 research airplane 16 times, reaching a top speed of 3,897 miles per hour and a peak altitude of 310,000 feet (almost 59 miles high).http://www.dfrc.nasa.gov/Gallery/Photo/X-15/ HTML/E-16808.html

    59 Miles should be enough to grant you space wings. They asked for a bit more for the Xprize (328,000 feet) but it is true than even spaceShipOne is gloating about "SpaceShipOne Wins X-Prize - Breaks X-15 altitude record"...

    Now, if he had won the prize money, he might have been more "impressed" with the matter...

    --
    It takes 40+ muscles to frown, but only four to extend your arm and bitchslap the motherfucker
  33. Too little, too late. by Starker_Kull · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Two of these three are dead, and I suspect Bill Dana is in his 70's, and probably doesn't care much. When you are young, flying on adrenaline and have a pretty high mortality rate, the small regconitions like wings and honors and medals mean a lot more. If it takes 40+ years to deliver them, after you have calmed down a bit and had a full life, it probably doesn't mean a whole lot for the people (well, person) it's being awarded to. I think it's being done to make the institution feel better about itself, not particularly for Dana, McKay, or Walker.

  34. Obviously not a slashdot scientist! by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 1

    This is slashdot. Convert We're into Were. It's a question by someone unfamiliar with the English language and its odd spelling.

    1. Re:Obviously not a slashdot scientist! by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Spelling is important. If somebody told you different, they were wrong.

      In this particular case, several spelling errors combined to cause the speaker's intent to be completely lost in the noise.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    2. Re:Obviously not a slashdot scientist! by Captain+Nitpick · · Score: 1
      This is slashdot. Convert We're into Were. It's a question by someone unfamiliar with the English language and its odd spelling.

      Which likely as not means the poster is American.

      --
      But then again, I could be wrong.
    3. Re:Obviously not a slashdot scientist! by Fishstick · · Score: 1

      made total sense to me, once I applied the slashdot filter! ;-)

      We are the astronauts' pilots, even though a monkey made [...] flights first.

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

  35. How about this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would like to see our political leaders adopt the character of their predecessors and NOT LIE the country into wars, or exploit for political gain public tragedies that occurred because of THEIR incompetency.

    1. Re:How about this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, you'll find quite a bit of FUD surrounding the war of 1812 and the way Madison and the republicans led us into a war we really shouldn't have fought.

      And I'm hoping you're not implying that 9/11 was a result of the current administration's incompetency. Their incompetency has caused numerous problems, but 9/11 is not one of them.

  36. They Should Get Overseas Ribbons Too by aquatone282 · · Score: 1

    Working and living around Edwards AFB should qualify as a remote tour. . .

    (Hint: keep zooming out until you find Rosamond, Lancaster, and Palmdale, California. Then zoom out some more until you find Los Angeles)

    --
    What?
  37. I always like the X-15 project by FluffyWithTeeth · · Score: 0

    It was much more innovative, and leading edge than the space prject, in a lot of ways. And, of course, the US could have beaten the soviets for the first guy in space if one of the X-15 pilots had just pulled up a bit... (Yes, the X-15s were capable of breaching escape velocity, I think they were told quite carefully *not* to go up, however, as there was nowhere near enough fuel or dozens of other things to get back down...)

  38. Military Service for Astronaut by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I remember about 25 years ago reading that civilians in space could not become titled astronauts. I thought it was a crock then and now. I can understand not wanting to "dilute" the "Best and brightest" with people from different countries, teachers, etc. But c'mon, if they make it, they make it. Times have changed. The cold war is over.

  39. Bout time. by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

    maybe Maurice Minnifield wil be recognized now.

  40. Childhood dreams by theolein · · Score: 1

    I grew up in South Africa and we had neither TV nor an open press, and we missed the moon landings, but my father collected national geographic and my childhood dreams were filled with articles and photos of brave men piloting rocket powered craft like the X-15 without the benefit of modern technology to unheard of speeds and heights and controlled landings.

    Those guys deserve medals, not just astronaut's wings.

  41. Scoff all you want by BancBoy · · Score: 1

    But Goose could have been saved if only Maverick had known this move! Wait, on second thought...

    --
    [UID-HeinzIntel]
  42. Real Men ... by stoolmaster · · Score: 0, Insightful

    ... unlike John Glenn, who was just "spam in a can" in both his flights, these men actually had to fly this craft both in space with reaction controls and in the atmosphere. Note also that the great Neil Armstrong was one of these real men who flew the gloriuos and successful X-15.

  43. Kittinger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think John Kittinger should've gotten astronaut wings too...even if he didn't go higher than 100000 feet. Well, he barely reached Mach 1...

  44. Even you are behind the times by zippthorne · · Score: 1

    Or did you mean to do that?

    You don't touch-tone a cell. You enter the number. No tones are involved. DTMF* encoding is another antique telephone technology that, like dialing, still works for legacy reasons.

    *Dual Tone Multi-Frequency

    --
    Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    1. Re:Even you are behind the times by Fishstick · · Score: 1

      You do if you are calling from a landline. ;-p

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

    2. Re:Even you are behind the times by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      PSTN equipment still uses DTMF, IIRC

      GSM, TDMA and CDMA networks, of course, do not use tones and transmit 'dialed' numbers of Control Channels.

      of course, YMMV, but IAATE

    3. Re:Even you are behind the times by zippthorne · · Score: 1

      Yeah, like I said, legacy reasons.

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
  45. XB-70 crash by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    Yep, that was it....I knew somewhere there had to be a website detailing this. I remember reading about this years ago, when I was building a plastic model of the XB-70 and did a little research into the plane. Growing up in the 60's was a great thing for a kid who like planes...there were TONS of things going on research wise, and all sorts of fantastic stories came out of the old Muroc dry lakebed......if only the catus could talk :)

  46. USAF Museum by p51d007 · · Score: 1

    Yeah, that's one of my "dream stops" that I want to make some day. I got to one of them this spring when on the way back from the South Dakota, black hills area, we detoured through the Omaha Nebraska area and spent a few hours at the SAC museum, halfway between Lincoln and Omaha. The size of the Convair/Consolidated B-36 is impressive, but I still want to get to the AF Museum and see that Valkerie. Here's a pan-o-rama of the main hanger at Omaha http://i16.photobucket.com/albums/b29/p51d007/Hang erPanorama1.jpg http://i16.photobucket.com/albums/b29/p51d007/Hang erPanorama1.jpg

  47. Automatic control is great, when it works... by rv8 · · Score: 1

    The automatic control system failed on the last Mercury flight. Gordon Cooper switched to manual control for the reentry, and did such a great job that he splashed down about 4 miles from the recovery ship. See details.

    --
    Kevin Horton
  48. Read Milt Thompson's book by asky · · Score: 1

    A lot of folks here cite Tom Wolfe's book or the NASA website. The best book I've read giving an internal perspective on the X-15 program is At the Edge of Space: The X-15 Flight Program by Milton O. Thompson, who was one of the pilots and a close friend of Bill Dana. It talks about how they prepared for a flight, the types of things that went wrong, life around Edwards and the Flight Research Center, etc. It is in many ways comparable to Yeager's autobiography, but set in the timeframe of the X-15 and lifting bodies.