Slashdot Mirror


Star Wreck Released as Download

Arto Rantala writes "After seven years of production, Star Wreck: In The Pirkinning, the Finnish Star Trek / Babylon 5 parody movie, was finally released on DVD a month ago and is now available for download. In spite of its practically zero budget, the film has a hilariously captivating story, top notch CGI and even a couple of performances from professional actors. Download it now and buy the DVD if you like it! I know I did. You can also obtain it directly from the .torrent"

46 of 239 comments (clear)

  1. Please use this link for the torrent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Please use http://www.starwreck.com/torrent/star_wreck_itp_su btitled_xvid.torrent to get the torrent. That will serve the file from the fastest server depending on load and your location.

  2. Creative Commons license by karvind · · Score: 2, Informative

    Please note that movie is released under Creative Commons license. I wonder if they will release it in US ? May be not. different copyright laws etc

  3. Ah bittorrent.. by JoeLinux · · Score: 5, Funny

    Bit Torrent makes for a very strange comment: "Hey! Cool! This link is slashdotted!"

    1. Re:Ah bittorrent.. by norttipertti · · Score: 2, Informative

      Oh go ahead and try.
      Pal of mine, who works at Magenta spent last night setting up seeds and taking care that there's servers in Finland, UK, US and whatever.
      He did mention that finnish server has had as much traffic in last 14 hours that it usually has in a year :)

      --
      Road to Hell is paved with frozen door-to-door salesmen.On weekends many of the younger demons go ice-skating down it
    2. Re:Ah bittorrent.. by Stavr0 · · Score: 2, Informative

      702 seeds, 650 peers. Sweet.

      magnet:?xt=urn:btih:6SKRD75AVN2WBVX3MU4KKK27Y4UH3T UP

  4. Re:Is the torrent legal? by WilliamSChips · · Score: 4, Informative

    Well, according to a post a few posts up, the movie is under a Creative Commons license, hence, it is legal.

    --
    Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
  5. Re:Is the torrent legal? by Ziviyr · · Score: 3, Interesting

    RTFA ... or even RTFCs.

    --

    Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
  6. Plot Summary (from IMdB) by dorkygeek · · Score: 5, Informative

    Plot Summary for
    Star Wreck: In the Pirkinning (2005) (V)

    The future looks bleak for Captain Pirk. Originally from the far future, he traveled back to save the world, but was shipwrecked on the 21st century. The world of the past is a dangerous place and he is finding it difficult to convince the ladies he is, in fact, an intergalactic space hero from the future. To make things right Pirk comes up with a questionable plan to save mankind's future...

    --
    Windows is like decaf - it tastes like the real thing, but it won't get you through the day.
  7. Re:Is the torrent legal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    The movie is released under a Creative Commons license and the .torrent is on the official web site, so yes, it's legal.

    -Arto

    (posted anonymously to avoid the karma)

  8. This Torrent Should Work Well by TheComputerMutt.ca · · Score: 2, Informative

    Seeds: 22 Connected (708 in Swarm)

  9. Finnish? Comedy? by arivanov · · Score: 2, Funny

    Gotta see it to believe it. Unless the creators of the movie are the only finns with a sense of humour in all Finland or members of their Swedish minority...

    --
    Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
    http://www.sigsegv.cx/
  10. Mirrors by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    The movie is released under Creative Commons, as you can see from the site itself.

    So if you can, mirrors would be greatly appreciated. We have a fast setup, but there are a lot of people downloading the movie.

    -Rigi, the Star Wreck webmonkey.

    1. Re:Mirrors by maswan · · Score: 4, Informative
      Here's a mirror, only has the highres content right now, since the torrent was way faster than the plain http download. But it will get there eventually too.


      http://ftp.acc.umu.se/mirror/media/StarWreck-InThe Pirkinning/


      Feel free to hit that, we can handle the load. :) If you need to offload your servers, you can provide http redirects to that host, once we have the wmv properly downloaded too.

      /Mattias Wadenstein

  11. Wheres the Babylon 5 factor? by Ziviyr · · Score: 2, Insightful

    All I read looks like pure Star Trek spoofage, except it the Slashdot article.

    Tell me I'm not downloading this for nothing...

    --

    Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
    1. Re:Wheres the Babylon 5 factor? by phulshof · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It has plenty of Babylon 5 factors in it as well. It's basically a Star Trek (Emperor James B. Pirk) vs Babylon 5 (Captain Sherrypie) movie. I found it to be a great movie, with some hilarious cracks and very nice space battles.

    2. Re:Wheres the Babylon 5 factor? by znark · · Score: 2, Informative
      All I read looks like pure Star Trek spoofage, except it the Slashdot article. Tell me I'm not downloading this for nothing...

      Not to worry. You could almost say there's more B5 spoofage in this movie than any Trek-related stuff. (The previous installments of the Star Wreck series have been pure Trek spoofage, though.)

    3. Re:Wheres the Babylon 5 factor? by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 2, Interesting

      First- yes solid B5 in the movie.

      My one geeky disappointment is that the starfleet didn't take advantage of their superior maneuverability and the B5 heavy ships limitations (B5 big ships are japanese-like and have "BIG GUNS" that fire forward only.) It would have been nice for them to take advantage of that weakness.

      --
      She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    4. Re:Wheres the Babylon 5 factor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You sir, need a girlfriend.

  12. In Pirk's words... by WWWWolf · · Score: 5, Informative

    "Did that ever take a *damned* long time." People have waited this movie for years, it was out in the midnight local time and Slashdot publishes an article full 23 hours later. Is this still News for Nerds? Get some priorities! =)

    Anyways, enjoy the movie - I pre-ordered the DVD and I've only watched it three and half times, but even based on such flimsy conclusions I can say I seriously think this thing just rules, one of the best scifi special effect movies I've seen, parody or not.

    What I find it interesting is that the website also has the .srt subtitles *and* a fairly detailed explanation from the translator on the intricacies of the translation - I sure hope this will make fan-provided translations a little bit better. Right now, I'm waiting for them to release the kind-of-promised SW:ITP soundtrack. This movie has some damn good music.

  13. What the hell... A review (no major spoilers) by Maxo-Texas · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Overall rating a 6 (8 if you are familiar with Startrek AND Babylon 5).

    Technically the movie was very good. The sound quality was good and the special effects were solid. There were a few spots I think could use polish- for example with the ship takes off the first time it goes straight up- I think a little tilt would have been used in the real series. But the quality was pro level in my opinion- "B" movie, not "A" movie- but pro.

    Costumes. The costumes were pretty solid but one of the lower parts of the movie. This makes sense and you have to spend -real- money to buy fabric. This is probably one of the limiting factors of non-big budget productions going forward. You can simulate the sets, you can get actors cheap, but you have to spend real money on things like costumes, chairs, etc.

    Production Quality. It was decent but suffered from having a small cast. You would see scores of starships but then only 20-30 people. I think some crowd scenes could be digitally multiplied to make them more effect.

    Tone. This is where the movie is uneven. It can't decide if it wants to be serious with humor or outright parody. Some parts are excellent, tense, serious and then it will veer sharply into stupid things that would not happen in real life. On the other hand- a lot of other scenes were much more like what WOULD happen in real life than you typically see in movies. The tone may be required to avoid lawsuits since parody is protected.

    Acting. To be honest- there is a lot higher quality acting than you might expect. Some of it is that the actors already know the character they are playing so they don't have to make it up. I think some actors play multiple roles. There are at least a dozen major characters in the movie and ALL are distinct and stand out (which is quite a feat in a 2 hour film). None of it felt "wooden". A fair amount of it was a bit overblown.

    Makeup. The costuming for Dwarf was a bit weak- and the costuming for a non alien was cheesy (a choice they made for a nose joke I think). Info was well done. General costumes are solid. The females looked pretty hot in some cases (but tall thin in a short black leather skirt is going to work in most cases).

    Action Scenes. These were very weak. Probably the weakest part of the film. I guess hollywood stuntpersons deserve a lot more credit than they get. I can understand- actors just can't hit and be hit without hurting themselves or getting hurt. Stuntpeople mitigate injury through training and they still get hurt.

    In Jokes. This is where SW rules. They really have a lot of fun poking jokes at the characters- even to the point of using them to advance the plot. Some are dead on, some are stupid, some misfire. But a lot more hits than misses.

    Plot. The plot is very well thought out- much better than many "A" hollywood movies. It has plenty of twists and turns. You don't know what to expect at any given time. I won't give much away but it is NOT just about a bunch of CGI ships flying around fighting- they ADVANCE the plot with those battles, but the plot is about characters and character conflict.

    Ending. The ending was solid- and well I won't say more but apparently there are some mistaken data assumptions.

    ---
    There are MANY hollywood films out that I would not watch for free. This movie, I would have happily paid 6 bucks to see (maybe 7).

    --
    She was like chocolate when she drank... semi-sweet at first and then increasingly bitter.
    1. Re:What the hell... A review (no major spoilers) by psavo · · Score: 3, Informative

      Yeah, just watched it and I mostly agree with your review.

      I'd gather that DVD version is better visually, I'm not a hifi junkie, but those xvid artifacts were hideous. DVD may also have better resolution to look for those easter eggs (communication system.. ;) and other funnies.

      It was so very weird to watch the movie and recognize so many places. B5-alike station features a hall, walkways and auditorium from my school, Tampere University of Technology.

      It has its rough edges, but it's funny, even the most basic wooden-leg-jokes (checking malfunctioning blaster..). And damn, it's a full 2 hour movie packed with things like that.

      --
      fucktard is a tenderhearted description
    2. Re:What the hell... A review (no major spoilers) by ak_hepcat · · Score: 2, Interesting

      okay, i'm about 2/3rds done watching it now.

      I have to say.. AMI bios and Finnish Linux bootscreen. Nice.

      --
      Support FSF: Stop thinking with your wallet, and think with your imagination. (cc/non-commercial)
    3. Re:What the hell... A review (no major spoilers) by imsabbel · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, even Xvid cant do magic, and for a 100minute movies, they could at last have mde it 700MB to fill a whole cd (that would have impreved things quite a bit already).

      --
      HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
    4. Re:What the hell... A review (no major spoilers) by h4rm0ny · · Score: 2, Insightful


      Have to post just to offset some of the dismissive reviews above. It was really well done, especially the acting the CGI space battles. I'd disagree that the action scenes were weak. They weren't hollywood blockbuster, but that wasn't the point. I'm sure that hand-fight between Pirk and Sherrypie was a pastiche on the terrible Star Trek hand to hand fighting., especially that flying kick.

      Sherrypie was doing a brilliant take off of Sheridan - really had the mannerisms down well. Ivanovitsa was also very very good.

      I also wont give away the ending, but I like both the twist and that the viewer is allowed to think "Do they really mean that..." without being hit over the head by it.

      But the BIOS bootscreen was just perfect. Perfect!

      I've only ever seen a few Star Treks (allergy to bad physics and internal inconsistency) but I did love Babylon V and this was an excellent take off. Spectacular for a small private production, really.

      --

      Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
  14. Ask Slashdot by Stavr0 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Is there an Azureus plugin that would automatically block peers that aren't in my side of the pond? Seems to me that it's ridiculous for the packets to start in Finland, cross the Atlantic, then back to other european countries. Perhaps not as drastic as block, but at least traffic shape/prioritize by physical proximity. (Yes I STFGoogle)

    1. Re:Ask Slashdot by aevan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Couldn't you reverse the IP filter under Options, set it to 'allow', and then just insert networks that are in your area? Or barring that, set it to deny and set it to block major foreign networks.

      It wouldn't be 100% perfect unless you were extremely thorough, but could get a majority blocked that way.

      I'm not entirely sure if this is a built-in feature, or a result of using the SafePeer plugin for Azureus. If so, SafePeer allows you to customise you list (just turn off the default 'periodic update', and manually add the IP ranges you wish to allow/deny).

  15. Tip: use the torrent for maximized download by Kultamarja · · Score: 2, Informative

    Please use the torrent file for maximized download. The servers are a bit crowded at the moment. There are several servers in New York, London and in Finland servicing the website and the direct downloads. However those servers typically have only a FE-network interface (100mbps) so it gets pretty crowded in an instant.

    However right now at the time of this post it's almost midnight in local Finnish time (EET) so downloading from the Finnish servers might be the fastest direct download link ATM. Lots of fins are either partying/boozing or sleeping at the moment, or have downloaded the movie earlier today.

    The Finnish servers are:

    http://www-fi.starwreck.com/
    http://www-fi2.starwreck.com/

    However it is strongly adviced that you use bittorrent - if you want to get the movie a bit faster ;-)

  16. Re:My review by advocate_one · · Score: 4, Informative

    oh p155 off... I've just finished watching it and have been in fits of laughter... you must have had you sense of humour extracted some time ago... there are several very deep in jokes in it... I especially liked the bit where Pirk and the Babel 13 captain were fighting each other in what appeared to be a tunnel... rather reminiscent of an early star trek episode where one protagonist was locked in eternal combat with his opposite from the anti-matter universe... and Pirks' female bridge officer... hmmm... seriously hot, those legs just seem to go on forever... especially when she's pulling her boots up most of the time...

    --
    Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
  17. This is the reason why RIAA/MPAA hates P2P by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    P2P software allows small artists to cheaply and easily distribute their work worldwide. RIAA/MPAA fears that some day people will realize that there is a lot of high quality entertaiment outside Hollywood.

    1. Re:This is the reason why RIAA/MPAA hates P2P by cgenman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Take a major motion picture. Rip it. Add a "preview" feature that lets you watch the first 20 minutes of the film for free. At a tense moment, redirect the viewer to a website to unlock the rest of the content. Distributers bypassed, developers make money. MPAA makes money.

      Yes, I said the MPAA makes money. While we're not talking about controlling traditional retail channels, there is no reason why they couldn't control online distribution. Get the members to agree, rework MPAA.com into the rental destination online, containing all of their member's catalogs available for preview and rental. People go there to find movies, and not other places.

      I don't know why this is such a hard concept for the MPAA... People flock to somewhere online in the same way that they flock to Blockbuster in the real world. People flocked to napster, they flocked to supernova.org despite there being millions of alternatives out there, people flock to iTunes for their music purchases... they would flock to MPAA.com too if they provided what people wanted. The MPAA would still control the distribution channel, and they would continue to make stupid amounts of money.

      It's just too bad that they're so afraid of losing their business to PC's that they forget just how much money they made on VHS sales and rentals (which they also thought would ruin them).

  18. DAMN YOU PIRARD by TheMonkeyDepartment · · Score: 2, Informative

    Sorry, the only Finnish Star Trek parody worth spending time on is the Internet classic "DAMN YOU PIRARD". Anything else pales in comparison.

  19. Get the DVD by squoozer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    but not via a download. Come on, give us a 4GB iso that can be burnt to a DVD and watched like a regular DVD. Sigh. It's not like it's costing them that much in the way of bandwidth as it's torrented. I imagine that it will probably cost more (bandwidth wise) if they decide to release a full DVD version for download in the future because their won't be so many peers.

    --
    I used to have a better sig but it broke.
  20. MIRROR by Gubbe · · Score: 2, Informative
  21. Seed it! by gcantallopsr · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's funny, and it's legal: don't be greedy and share it. If you have some kind of hosting with pre-paid bandwidth in excess, just use it. I'll be seeding it at 512KB/s (that's 4Mbps) for one week :-D

    --
    Try Ubuntu GNU/Linux, it's great!!!
  22. And you admit that on /. ? by J_Omega · · Score: 3, Funny

    Be very cautious around new people this week.

    Some may attempt to revoke your geek card.

  23. The /. effect on BitTorrent by Dwonis · · Score: 3, Funny
    Heh. Slashdot has an interesting effect on BitTorrent downloads:
    | status: finishing in 5:54:58 (2.7%)
    | speed: 25.8 K/s down - 104.6 K/s up
    | totals: 6.4 M down - 26.1 M up
  24. Re:What is a normal torrent flux by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 3, Informative

    KiB = 1024
    KB = 1000

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  25. Re: Translations by znark · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I recognize that it is supposed to be like that because it is a joke- but it is really weak as a joke- it seemed more silly than funny. Changing the weapons to standard names would strengthen the piece for me and make the other humor stand out more.

    The weird technical terminology in SW:ITP (such as "hand twinkler") has been consistently used in the previous Star Wreck movies, as well. They names are equally silly in the original Finnish dialog. There isn't really much you can do about it any longer, as those terms have become an integral part of the Star Wreck series.

    That being said, if you have already seen the movie in its entirety, and don't fear of being spoiled any more, you might want to take a look at the annotated English translation which gives some backround to of many of the more peculiar word choices and figures of speech in the English subtitles.

    Anyone considering fansubbing or fandubbing In the Pirkinning should study that document very carefully in order not to miss the many in-jokes and subleties in the original script.

    Moreover, it would be highly advisable to contact the authors before conceiving translation projects of any kind so that things can be kept well-coordinated and technically sound, and you don't end up needlessly duplicating projects that others have already started working on.

    To get in touch with the authors, try dropping a message on the Star Wreck Forum, or simply emailing them.

  26. Re:Mmmm, well I guess it shows why hollywood rules by mvkorpel · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think the people making the film have the right to decide the language used in their production. I'm sure they had their reasons to use Finnish instead of English. Seeing comments from people like you who don't seem to appreciate the diversity in this world, I begin to understand the French who carefully try to protect their language.

    For the record, we are Finns, not fins. Here http://www.yourdictionary.com/images/ahd/jpg/A4fin .jpg are some fins.

    You suggested that Finns are often angry and drunk. Well, where I live (student village in Espoo, Finland) people are often happy when drunk.

  27. The cultural and translational problems by Kizor · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As a Finn myself I'm still skeptical about the international appeal. The film has received very good reviews and feedback, but it's all domestic. Speaking with the authoritative voice of a person who hasn't actually seen it yet, the fact is that In The Pirkinning makes extensive use of its Finnishness.

    The subtitles of the previous installments don't seem to be there for allowing English-speakers to comprehend what's going on as much as compounding the funniness inherent in Star Trek in Finnish. They certainly don't work half as well on their own. Not only are a lot of nuances lost when converting Finno-Ugric speech into terse Latin-influenced Germanic writing, but someone relying on subtitles won't even notice the overtranslations - replacements for words that usually are just lifted from English - and has to skip a crucial part of the constant wordplay. Calling 'warp' 'twist' isn't funny. Calling 'warp' a Finnish word that can mean 'warp' 'twist' or 'perversion' while simultaneously displaying an English translation calling it 'twist' to an audience that fully well knows that it's 'warp'... that is funny precisely in the way that good jokes mess with your head. If you can't see why, that likely was my point.

    As TNG episode "Darmok" tells us, even universal translators wouldn't guarantee full understanding, unless they were superadvanced subspace translators that interfaced directly with their users' brains feeding them required knowledge, but I digress. Even if the language barrier was removed the average outlander would hardly notice that Info's named after a bookstore chain, much less that his motto is from the old advertisements of said chain. He likely wouldn't have the right misconceptions about the Russian Mafia (even, or in fact especially, if he was actually Russian). Even if I was explaining the hilarious multi-faceted pun that is Garibaldi-equivalent's name I wouldn't know how. Juxtapositions are kinda lost on those who aren't familiar with both of the juxtees, too. And these things go on throughout the movie!

    Don't get me started on the onslaught of sight gags or how much is conveyed by tone of voice.

  28. Re:What is a normal torrent flux by cmacb · · Score: 2, Informative

    I think you meant that the other way around. Normally download is faster than upload (precisely to keep you from using your home computer as a server).

    I think the torrent systems are over-hyped as a SPEEDY way to download files. Like the Nutella and clones that followed the primary purpose of these things are (as I understand them):

    * Provided a persistent (in the sense of "keeps trying") download for large files, with error correction, restart-ability, multiple sources/paths etc.

    * Relative anonymity. The point is to guarantee that the file you end up with is the file you went after... authenticate the data, not you.

    * Reduce or eliminate bandwidth cost to original file providers by spreading the workload out to (among others) home users.

    * Manage your download and corresponding upload activity so as not to render your web browser useless. In other words there are caps placed on how much of your bandwidth gets used.

    * Do all this without human intervention or giant server farm managing it.

    You might look for some settings in your client that will speed things up, but depending on who else is downloading and what their limitations are, these adjustments may have little effect, no effect, or may make things worse.

    Best bet is to start the download in the background and forget about it for a while (but don't forget so much that you turn your computer off at night). Look for a present under the tree 13 hours from now.

  29. Re:Mmmm, well I guess it shows why hollywood rules by glwtta · · Score: 3, Funny
    If you are going to spend 7 years on a movie learn english. It is not that hard.

    What the hell are you smoking? If you are going to spend 7 years on a movie, you damn better make it in whatever language you want to make it in. Picking you native language doesn't seem like that much of a stretch.

    At least George Lucas knows how to really direct quality actors.

    You must've seen a George Lucas movie that I haven't. George Lucas knows how to waste 300 million dollars on crappy special effects. If there was any actual acting in the last three Star Wars, I must've missed it.

    --
    sic transit gloria mundi
  30. The most suprising thing... by MachDelta · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...about this movie wasn't the decent-to-good acting of the main characters, or the humorous yet interesting story, the hillarious gags, or even the totally awesome special effects.

    No, I think the most suprising thing about this movie is just how many good looking girls they managed to convince to participate in a complete geek-fest of a film. (Hellloooo Bridge-Girls!)

    I dunno about the rest of you, but if there's really that many hot girls in Finland who like nerdy stuff, i'm packing my bags! ;)

  31. Lightwave by MachDelta · · Score: 2, Informative

    From what I found poking around on their forums, I believe they used Lightwave for their (extensive) special effects.

  32. This is still a fan film by superhoe · · Score: 4, Insightful
    When reading the reviews, I just can't resist saying this:

    Star Wreck is a fan movie. It's basically zero-budget. There is simply no other fan movie coming even close to it. I think it is quite interesting to notice that unlike on most fan films, people always start (intentionally or intentionally) comparing SW to real movies like Hollywood stuff. That never happens on discussions about fan films.

    Somebody below this even said 'this shows that Hollywood still rules' and 'at least George Lucas can direct professional actors'. Yeah, and does he do that in his bedroom? :D

    Hollywood never produces anything like this, because a term Hollywood movie means at least some $$$ put into it by default. Even the worst of the worst have some budget. The reviews which compare SW to Hollywood stuff are a massive victory to the makers of this movie.

    They just show that the flick is so neat for a fan flick that people can't treat it as such anymore :D

    --

    -el

    1. Re:This is still a fan film by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      You said: They just show that the flick is so neat for a fan flick that people can't treat it as such anymore :D

      My answer: This is so true. The final testament to the perceived quality of the film is that it has already been available for a while as a Russian pirate version. Reference: http://www.film-dvd.ru/index.php?a=2&id=3024

      The Russian cover says the name of the movie is: "Zvezdnaya avarija na parkovke" and continues to define it as "Parodiya na seryaly Star Trek I Vavilon 5." Also of note is "Rezhisser: Timo Vuorensola." The English name is, of course, wrong: "Star Wreck: The Pirkinning." However, there are both English and Russian dubbed soundtracks in 5.1, so it appears to be a more or less professionally made disc.

      Could there still be any compliment higher than this (although we can be absolutely sure that this DVD is totally illegal)?