Slashdot Mirror


China To Develop Its Own DVD Format

An anonymous reader wrote to mention an MSNBC story covering a move by the Chinese entertainment industry to create their own DVD standard, the second such announcement in two years. From the article: "If successful, the move could add a new wrinkle to the battle between HD DVD and the competing Blu-ray Disc formats over which will become the dominant new DVD standard. The official Xinhua News Agency said the new standard will be based on but incompatible with HD DVD, which is being promoted by Toshiba Corp. and Universal Studios, as well as Intel Corp. and Microsoft Corp., the leading suppliers of chips and software for most of the world's personal computers."

58 of 313 comments (clear)

  1. Don't pin your hopes on their first format by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Because an hour later, they'll have a new one.

    1. Re:Don't pin your hopes on their first format by AKAImBatman · · Score: 5, Informative

      I honestly don't understand what China thinks it will accomplish. You don't become an economic juggernaut by taking steps to cut yourself off from the rest of the world. If China wants the economic benefits of creating standards rather than just using them, they need to create a standard that the rest of the world will adopt. That way *they* can control the standard and ensure its success.

      Instead they're merely making an incompatible version of someone else's standard. Something which they have no real economic power to force. They can force it politically, but that would simply piss off "The People of China" that much more when they can't import any foreign entertainment. (Certainly, a big import/export for any first world country.)

      The only thing I can say is that it's probably again about control. They aren't looking at the economic implications, they're looking at preventing ideas like "freedom", "democracy", and "Dallas" (I'm only half-way joking here) from being imported.

    2. Re:Don't pin your hopes on their first format by microbee · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They aren't looking at the economic implications, they're looking at preventing ideas like "freedom", "democracy", and "Dallas" [wikipedia.org] (I'm only half-way joking here) from being imported. I don't think so (translate: what you said is complete B.S.) China just doesn't want to pay royalty to the current patent holders. If China adopted the existing standards, it would have to pay for every DVD player it made. China industry has been groaning over this for years. Not everything is about politics.

    3. Re:Don't pin your hopes on their first format by Dot.Com.CEO · · Score: 3, Informative
      I am sorry but your understanding of macroeconomics is limited at best. China is growing at a rate of 7-12% a year and projections make it seem that until 2025 it will be the world's largest economy by far. If I may say so, if you want to have such a strong opinion on China (I remember you had another post I commented only yesterday and you also seem to go on about it on your blog) read a bit on it. I suggest the Economist's analysis here.

      I am sorry to say your anti-Chinese rhetoric is absurdly naive, as it is. No offence.

      --
      Mother is the best bet and don't let Satan draw you too fast.
    4. Re:Don't pin your hopes on their first format by Guppy06 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "You don't become an economic juggernaut by taking steps to cut yourself off from the rest of the world. "

      Of what use is a standard developed in Japan or the United States when DVD players are still manufactured in China anyway? China has the power to put this new standard onto store shelves around the world, and the debate between content publishers and technology companies will seem moot when the consumers themselves are presented an option that is cheaper than both competitors (because there's no obnoxious licensing fees).

      Both flavors of Western(-esque) corporations may want to use a format that lets them enact DRM or region control, but ultimately they will have to sell on a format that people will buy, or no format at all.

      Personally, with my dissatisfaction with the interests involved in the BluRay vs. HD-DVD debate, I'm very interested to see what the PRC has to offer. The "communists" may finally show us how capitalism is supposed to work.

    5. Re:Don't pin your hopes on their first format by Dot.Com.CEO · · Score: 2, Informative

      China actually has a sizeable middle class. Not the size (in %) of western economies but it's getting there.

      --
      Mother is the best bet and don't let Satan draw you too fast.
  2. Quality? by The+Infidel · · Score: 4, Funny

    Not to sound jingoistic by any means, but 'made in China' and 'quality product' rarely appear in the same paragraph (with the exception of this one...)

    1. Re:Quality? by grumpyman · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Are you kidding man? You can't compare it with high-end uber-users stuff, but the 'quality' is up to the level that majority of the world uses it. Check out which piece of electronic in your home is not made in China.

    2. Re:Quality? by Prophet+of+Nixon · · Score: 2, Informative

      They make splendid steel products, as does Japan. Never get Pakistani steel though, ugh.

      I always find that the most inferior foreign products aren't from any particular country, but are either A) sold in Radio Shack, or B) those things that say 'MADE IN USA' all over the packaging, because the packaging (or the sticker) is, but the product inside could be from anywhere.

    3. Re:Quality? by Ced_Ex · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not to sound jingoistic by any means, but 'made in China' and 'quality product' rarely appear in the same paragraph (with the exception of this one...)

      Having friends with factories in China, I can tell you that quality can be adjusted any way you want.

      You want cheap products, they can make it cheap, they skimp on QA to save dollars. However, if you want them to produce high quality goods, they can do that too, just add some extra $$$ to the bottom line and they can make it to whatever quality standard you want.

      It's all about how much you want to spend.

      --
      Live forever, or die trying.
    4. Re:Quality? by kfg · · Score: 5, Interesting

      To move away from the high tech answers you're already getting I bought a student violin this year, made in China, two hundred bucks. Violin, bow and case. I wanted something I could bang around, take camping or to the beach and not worry about overmuch. Should be junk, right?

      It is a better made, and with a little tweaking has turned out to be a better instrument, than my vintage and antique European and American instruments of considerably higher "value." As it plays in it just keeps getting better and better. I'm so impressed I'm planning to add a cello of the same model to my collection.

      At a gig a friend asked if he could try it. When he picked it up and started to play his first comment was, "Niiiiiiiice bow!"

      Perhaps you have to be a violin player to understand the ramifications of that comment.

      It was not too long ago, in historical terms, that China and Japan were known as the source of the finest handmade items in the world. Europeans didn't risk their necks and their investments going all the way to China for junk. Made in China was not merely a mark of something being exotic, but a mark of quality absolutely unobtainable from anywhere else. Quality that you could see and feel.

      Japan spent about a century getting beat up. They got over it. China spent about two centuries getting beat up, and beat up rather worse. They're finally starting to get over it.

      It's a biiiiiiiiig frickin' dragon that's awakening; and it wants its reputation back.

      KFG

    5. Re:Quality? by grumpyman · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The majority of the world uses it not because it's quality, but because it's much cheaper, and people have been lulled/tricked into not considering quality anymore.

      True, but 'much cheaper' or 'chinese made' does not automatically implies 'poor quality'. This is the sweeping statement that the original poster made which I don't agree.

      Moreover, we have to wonder why so much stuff that we use these days are made in China. Different people have different perception on quality, and I won't say that most of the Chinese stuff are "quality-made" per se. However, these Chinese made stuff has to reach a certain quality level in order be adopted so widely and used everyday by so many in household or business - and I dare to say, some of them depend on these Chinese made stuff. If they are so bad quality that will work for a moment and next moment it ceases to work, then I'll bet everybody will yell and holla about it, and refuse to buy anything made in China. I think it was like that maybe 5 - 10 years ago, and it's a fun joke about 'stuff made in China', but now apparently that's less and less of the case.

    6. Re:Quality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The answer will always be: "Every piece that lasts more than 2 years"

      Nice racist touch there. Funny thing is, people used to say that about Japanese goods a few decades ago (not to mention Taiwan and Korea). Now look at who makes high-end electronics.

    7. Re:Quality? by Jherek+Carnelian · · Score: 2, Funny

      When he picked it up and started to play his first comment was, "Niiiiiiiice bow!"

      Well of course it was a nice bow. The Chinese have been bowing for millenia, I expect they've got the whole thing down pat. Now, if he had said, "nice handshake!" That would be something else.

    8. Re:Quality? by kfg · · Score: 2, Funny

      . . .what was that word again?

      Japan?

      Maybe I'm thinking of something different. :)

      KFG

    9. Re:Quality? by Hiro+Antagonist · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Few Westerners know the difference, sadly.

      One of the guys I see often at my climbing gym is from Taiwan. A few days ago, he came in with a T-shirt that had the Red Bull logo on it, and a bunch of stuff in Thai. So, I asked him if he picked up his Thai Red Bull shirt here, and he was stunned that I even recognized the language.

      Apparently, a few people had asked him if it was Italian. Some thought French. One guy asked if it was German.

      Goes to show how little some people know.

      --

      --
      I Hit the Karma Cap, and All I Got Was This Lousy .sig.
  3. The question is... by Jupix · · Score: 2, Insightful

    WHY? What's wrong with uniform standards for the whole world? Why can't I just buy stuff from where I want to buy it?

    1. Re:The question is... by shokk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What makes you think that a product that 1 billion people use cannot be considered a standard on its own? Why does something have to be produced with the approval of the rest of the world, where there is a real chance that this thing could be adopted on top of all the other many formats. Honestly, with all the CD and DVD formats, what is one more to pack into all-in-one readers and burners these days?

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
  4. Patents? by jsrjsr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "based on but incompatible with HD DVD"

    I'm wondering how they're going to avoid the patents involved (after all, their stated reason for doing this is to avoid the licensing fees).

  5. they already have one by crabpeople · · Score: 5, Funny

    its called VCD :P

    --
    I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
  6. If based on, but incompatible means... by Stonent1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That it is HD-DVD but without DRM. I fully support this effort!

    1. Re:If based on, but incompatible means... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 3, Interesting
      What it probably means is that it uses HD-DVD disks, but a different encoding. I would imagine that they are picking something that doesn't require the payment of licensing fees to foreign interests. HD-DVD specifies things like MPEG-4 and (I think - I can't remember if it made it into the final standard) WMV. If they used a home-grown CODEC then Chinese player manufacturers wouldn't have to pay US corporations (e.g. Microsoft, Dolby) to produce their players, even if they wish to sell them in the American market. This could potentially dramatically reduce the amount of money that flows from China to the US.

      Note that this isn't conceptually new. It was originally announced at least a year ago as a DVD competitor. The news seems to be that it is now targeting HD instead of SD.

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  7. Hmm... by burtdub · · Score: 4, Funny
    "the new standard will be based on but incompatible with HD DVD"

    Then where will Americans get their $2 bootleg DVDs?

  8. Good luck, China. by djdole · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Good luck getting anyone to care. If it were Japan with Sony's backing, then ok.
    But China....um, no.

    *flips over a DVD (from the future)* "Made in China"
    Unlikely
    HIGHLY Unlikely

    1. Re:Good luck, China. by node+3 · · Score: 3, Funny

      *flips over a DVD (from the future)* "Made in China"
      Unlikely
      HIGHLY Unlikely


      I think you may be right. It'll definitely say "Made in USA".

      Of course, it'll be written in Chinese. And we'll all be able to read it. Fluently.

  9. Chinese Censorship by Scoria · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The Chinese government will certainly benefit from this. If the hardware sold in China is no longer capable of playing foreign discs, then the Chinese government will have absolute control of what can be viewed by most of the Chinese people.

    If the Chinese government doesn't like a political documentary, they can simply refuse to release it domestically. The Great Firewall will prevent you from downloading a copy, and smuggling a foreign copy in will no longer be an option. You won't be able to play it, after all.

    --
    Do you like German cars?
    1. Re:Chinese Censorship by ngr8 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It would, of course, be gauche to say "ME TOO!".

      This begins to complete a package for the Great Wall: get the offshore search engines to "private label" Internet search, so no nasty ProtestorTankPic.jpg can be found, so that Chinese bloggers/reporters can be turned in, and hardware-based media (DVD) can be private labeled for "safe" domestic distribution in China.

      Look: its bad enough that the Wal*Marts have changed the content of CDs and what's on their magazine racks. This is a nation state, a growing and strong nation state, that is not exactly fighting the good fight.

      So the above poster's onto a theme there: it's not about copyright or piracy, it's a control game. They may be fighting against entropy and innovation, but it is still a control of information game.

      Ok. Time for decaf.

      --
      Verizon: Latin for "poor rural service".
    2. Re:Chinese Censorship by mickwd · · Score: 3, Funny

      "...the Chinese government will have absolute control of what can be viewed by most of the Chinese people."

      Hmmmmm.....control over what content can be viewed and by whom.....

      Sounds like some sort of DRM scheme.

      No-one would dream of trying anything like that in the free, capitalist west, now would they?

  10. they set us up the DVD by brainspank · · Score: 2, Funny

    Do they really need a new format just to support Engrish subtitles?

    --
    It's only a model.
  11. Seriously... by TheRealMindChild · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... the rest of the world probably doesn't care. While China may be on the same physical planet as the rest of us, they arent playing on the same logical field. In terms of copywrite and intellectual property, we are completely seperate worlds, and I doubt either really cares about the other.

    --

    "When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade. Make life take the lemons back!" -- Cave Johnson
    1. Re:Seriously... by Baki · · Score: 3, Insightful

      China still has sound ideas w.r.t. intellectual property, namely that it is largely harmful. They will benefit from all wasted resources in the parts of the world obsessed with this evil concept, which is hostile to civilisation and development.

    2. Re:Seriously... by timeOday · · Score: 3, Insightful
      ... the rest of the world probably doesn't care.
      Doesn't China make most of the rest of the word's DVD players? Maybe they'll push to make this the standard here, too, so they don't have to pay so many royalties.

      That would be fine with me. I'm all for direct importation of Chinese goods without ridiculous markups for the "American" brand-name. (See Nike and Levis). So long as I'm buying goods with my outsourcing-deflated wages, I'd like the opportunity to buy at equally deflated prices. I don't think the greedy American overlords who cut all their American workers add much value anyways.

    3. Re:Seriously... by Comboman · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Yes very different. The evil, communist, totalitarian Chinese government wants to have complete control over what their people see and hear.

      ...whereas the democratic, free-market, capitalist MPAA/RIAA want to have complete control over what their customers see and hear.

      --
      Support Right To Repair Legislation.
  12. The only reason why MS is behind HD-DVD by varmittang · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Is because they put it in their Xbox360s. MS couldn't license or didn't want to pay to license the Sony Blue-Ray, so they had to go with HD-DVD to give more room for the programmers to give game content. If Blue-Ray becomes the standard, then the Xboxes that are coming out will only be game consoles, not home entertainment pieces. They would be forced out of the living room since DVDs would be Blue-Ray only, and wouldn't play though their Xbox consoles. This is why HD-DVD is so important to them, not because its better format.

    --
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    12345
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
    1. Re:The only reason why MS is behind HD-DVD by nutshell42 · · Score: 4, Informative
      so they had to go with HD-DVD to give more room for the programmers to give game content.

      Xbox360 games use DVDs.

      Which is the reason MS supports HD-DVD. They've got nothing to lose. They announced their intent to think about the possibility to include an HD drive for movie playback at some time in the future or not. So if Blu-Ray wins big deal, MS simply puts a BR drive in their consoles. On the other hand if they can kill Blu-Ray, they negate one of the main advantages of the PS3 (i.e. the one that it is a HD player. Sony sold a lot of PS2s that way when stand-alone DVD players were still expensive) one Sony will use to justify the (supposedly) higher price of their console

      --
      Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage
  13. I disagree by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    China is the only country to make decent DVD players. Their players don't force you to watch commercials, they don't force macrovision on you, and they don't enforce region coding.

  14. Best News Ever by dada21 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now we can:

    * Bootleg Chinese DVDs to sell on every market corner in the US
    * Make a US region and sell unlocked US-made DVD players in China
    * Terribly mispell Chinese words in our manual
    * Make badly lip-synced English voice overs on the DVDs
    * Open Caucasian-run DVD stores in China with thousands of bootlegs, and canned American food
    3. ???
    4. Profit!!!

  15. Oh please another format by waterlogged · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Please sir may I have some more? I am really getting sick of these format wars every couple of years. What really needs to happen is for nobody to get any money out of these format incriments. No royalties, no advertising money, nothing. THEN maybe they can all agree on a single low cost high compression format that can be universally accepted.

              This would work because everyone would sell more, movies, games, data discs, whatever. I'm tired of big electronics bickering amongst themselves, and the only ones being left out are the consumers. I say let the cream rise to the top and pick that format. When money concerns get involved with engineering concerns is when things get futzzed up.

    --
    I couldn't fail to disagree with you any less.
  16. China?!! by linumax · · Score: 2, Funny

    hmmm, is it some kinda company?! like Sony or Toshiba or even Cuba?

  17. Information control? by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My first thought when i read this is "Great Firewall".

    Picture this:

    1) China develops its incompatible format and patents it.
    2) They won't provide licenses to anyone they don't want to.
    3) They forbid the use of the DVD standard, so people won't be able to buy or copy DVD's.
    4) They copy the DVD's and release them (censored of course) in their own format.
    5) ???
    6) Total Control!

    Or maybe I'm too paranoid? Perhaps they only want economical gains from this, so 6) Profit!!

    I really don't know.

  18. I'll bet it's royalty-related by winkydink · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As in, the Chinese mfgs will be expected to pay some kind of licensing/royalty fee for the other formats and not for the PRC-developed one.

    --

    "I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey

    1. Re:I'll bet it's royalty-related by AviLazar · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I would wager it will allow China to more easily control what media enters their country. If people can only purchase this dvd player, and china keeps this format niche, then other countries are less likely to carry it - and less likely to have unwanted movies/music/more on it. Basically - control.

      --

      I mod down so you can mod up. Your welcome.
  19. Losing DVD Battle by Mulletproof · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ""If successful, the move could add a new wrinkle to the battle between HD DVD and the competing Blu-ray Disc formats over which will become the dominant new DVD standard. "

    If successful, the could also heavily regulate what their populace is allowed to view given their complete control over this specialized format that nobody else will ever use. Yeah, color me a tad paranoid, but I nearly always assume that the Chinese government has ulterior motive beyond the headlines. Of course, they could be doing it for pure profit and control of an industry standard, but lets face it, they're starting a bit late in the game and offering little in the way of innovation to actually have any sort of leverage. But saying 'yay' or 'nay' as to which movies (and ideas) get pressed for their populace to view? Yeah, I can see that.

    That's not to say I think it'll work in either senario. The standards are too entrenched either way and their competition already has a head start and mass marketing experience.

    --
    You need a FREE iPod Nano
  20. License Fees by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    They probably don't want to pay technology license fees to the west. I don't blame them.

  21. Usians Ignorant of (their own) History, Repeat It by Quirk · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The Comments laughing at the idea of the Chinese being innovative reverberate with the jibes thrown at the japanese economy after WWII. The japanese were seen as copiers, inept as engineers, and suited to making cupie dolls and other knock offs.

    Now, in America, it's the Chinese who are seen to be a bungling satellite economy dependent upon American management and good old American know how. And how did that turn out last time around with the japanese?

    --
    "Academicians are more likely to share each other's toothbrush than each other's nomenclature."
    Cohen
  22. missing step 3.5 by way2trivial · · Score: 2, Insightful

    electronics factory in china, employed in the production of THOUSANDS of DVD players for export to the US, suddenly grows incredibly profitable, while at the same time recording a much higher than thought possible component/device failure rate in production....

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  23. In Other News by jnadke · · Score: 2, Funny

    Beijing (AP) - In a move that has surprised the world, China has announched today that its new DVD format will be 100% Freedom-Free. "We want to make sure terrorists cannot attack the pride of the People's Republic of China," said President Hu Jintao. "China will not be hindered by other formats that could possibly include Freedom protocols," he concluded.

    "We were just trying to stop those damned file sharers," said Mitch Bainwol, Chairman and CEO of the RIAA. "This time, China has gone too far. They can't expect to attack freedom and get away with it. Besides, how are we supposed to be the bad guys when China shows us up with this? We have an image to maintain."

    Following the announcement, the RIAA is expected to respond later today with a Data-Free DVD format. "You can't steal what you can't see," said Bainwol.

  24. Utilitarian need: by paperclip2003 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How long before manufactures just make players and writers detect and support all formats?

  25. YET another one!? by Jugalator · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I first thought this was about EVD, and an ancient dupe, but after RTFA, it sounds like this is YET another one?? They aren't even done with the EVD's...

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  26. Figured this looked familiar... by jamesshuang · · Score: 3, Informative

    DUPE!

    Yeah, go slashdot... =p

  27. How long before the UN and EU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    decide that they should be in charge of DVD formats? :)

  28. Mod Parent UP! - That's it... or close enough by J_Omega · · Score: 2, Interesting

    at least as far as I understand it. RTFA and it mentions the liscensing fees.

    Current DVD players (most made in China) need to buy the "rights" to decode/play the region specific DVD encodings. This liscensing cost makes up somewhere between 40%-50% (TFA says 40%) of the entire production cost per player.

    With their own format, production costs drop by nearly 50%... units can be sold for less while making a larger profit... consumers buy more... company makes tons more money. (assuming that consumers do buy into the new format.)

    I don't see how this is a bad thing, really. Sure, it might be a new format that noone can currently play at home, but that's the same thing with HD DVD and BlueRay. Also, DVDs are region encoded so that you can't always (easily) play them all as is (without hacking the player.)

    It looks like the Chinese format won't be encumbered by DRM crap, but is geared towards anti-piracy. (not the same thing, right?)

  29. Ummm, almost all of it? by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My computer was built here by me, teh parts are quite varied. Processor is from Ireland, motherboard from Taiwan of US parts, memory is Germany, disks Malaysia, monitor Japan. My mixer and amp are from the US, speakers Great Britan. My TV is a Japanese maker (Toshiba), but made in the US by dBx. That's probably the extent of the electronics I'd call high-quality. I do have a number of things made in China, but none of it rates up there on my quality scale.

    I personally don't check country of origin for determining quality, however it seems when I've found a part I consider to be quality, it usually isn't Chinese in origin.

    1. Re:Ummm, almost all of it? by grumpyman · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I don't know what you think about stuff made in Taiwan, but a lot of mobos are from there and stuff like tyan, supermicro are widely used in datacenter applications. And oh yeah, they're starting to outsource manufacturing to mainland China lol.

      Besides, if all our non-chinese electronics are really all that high quality, why do BestBuy and Walmart and those guys make a killing selling "extended warranty"?

      Hmm, what you just said is somewhat contradictory. If they're making a killing selling 'extended warranty' that means they don't really have to replace that many pieces of their sold gears.

      I don't have anything "against" stuff made in China per se, but they really have to work hard to shed the bad rep that they have. Occasionally I see news articles from Hong Kong about chinese-brand electronics spontaneously combusting causing small home fires. Not exactly confidence inspiring...

      I've heard those news. It's not fun when your cellphone is warming your thigh and starting a fire.

  30. by creating differing standards... by zogger · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...they gain amazing market leverage. They aren't cutting themselves off, they are guaranteeing profits and not even have to even think about exporting cash. Explanation: they have the industrial capacity to still EXPORT any and all formats,in any quantity, anywhere, to anyone, so they don't care about "formats" except it's a market. But, who will want to try and make a chinese standard disk and try to import it INTO china and expect to make a profit? Answer, no one. See, they cover their humongous domestic market, plus the rest of the planet. Win/Win for them, and guaranted to most always keep their rapidly expanding internal markets domesticaly driven. Yes, they import, and they mostly import machine tools to go ahead and setup more factories to build stuff, when it comes to durable goods, that or prototypes they can either license legally and clone or just heck with it, clone anyway. It's only taken them 25 or so years to go from a marginal player with a huge population to the worlds leading manufacturing nation, and all the indicators say this will continue until they are also the highest GDP.

    They are long term strategic thinkers, they don't fool much with this quarters profit mentality. That's why they are out there signing 20 year energy deals or outright buying up the sources, along with strategic minerals.

    1. Re:by creating differing standards... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They aren't cutting themselves off, they are guaranteeing profits and not even have to even think about exporting cash.

      Hardly. They have to force the producers of movies to support the Chinese format. And why would anyone support the Chinese format when everyone in China already has DVD or BluRay players? The government could force the market to only sell players that handled their format, but that would only serve to create a massive black market.

      Explanation: they have the industrial capacity to still EXPORT any and all formats,in any quantity, anywhere, to anyone, so they don't care about "formats" except it's a market.

      Eh? They're entertainment discs. The problem is foreign imports of movies, not exports. Foreign companies aren't going to bother with the Chinese format unless there's an incentive to do so. What's the incentive?

      But, who will want to try and make a chinese standard disk and try to import it INTO china and expect to make a profit? Answer, no one.

      Exactly.

      See, they cover their humongous domestic market, plus the rest of the planet.

      You're assuming again that China doesn't need to import movies. That's not such a good assumption. At the very least (given the rampant piracy) some people need to have players to transcode foreign discs into the Chinese format. Most likely, the Chinese people will continue to purchase DVD or Blueray players on the black market, and DVD or Bluray discs to go with them.

  31. Re:Usians Ignorant of (their own) History, Repeat by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The Chinese, much like the Japanese before them, are headed for a massive banking meltdown in a few years. Something like 50% of their loan portfolio is bad debt. Japan is widely known as a 'zombie economy' because after the bubble burst in 1989, they were unable to make changes (banks fail, companies bankrupt) due to their culture, and China is headed down the same road.

    And as for management and know-how? I've been living in China for 2 years doing business here. The Chinese don't know their ass from their elbow. Good engineers, but they don't know how to run a business unless someone wrote the procedure in a manual. They also have a very well-deserved reputation for double dealing and outright fraud. My company was burned by defective products twice, and that's why I'm here, to keep an eye on things. I check everything. I have a friend who spends his days inspecting every single piece of furniture that goes out of his company's factory. If we didn't do this, we'd get burned. The Chinese will happily take your money and screw you.

    And as far as the Japanese economy after WWII, they did produce crap. It took them decades to make quality goods for export. Maybe if you knocked off the knee-jerk slurs against Americans and either did some exporting or read some history, you wouldn't sound so ignorant in front of such a wide audience.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  32. No copy protection? by pyite69 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If they had support for high definition without copy protection, this should hopefully become the worldwide standard.